Localboot rules after ZDM7SP1IR4_HP2

Problem: Imaging rules on another product except "Dell 760" cannot run with "c1" rules or "put an image on this workstation on next boot" after the last service pack ZDM7SP1IR4_HP2 (localBoot)
Environement: Before: Zenworks 7 sp1R3A Desktop management on Netware open enterprise 6.5sp7
Environement: After: Zenworks 7 ZDM7SP1IR4_HP2.zip Desktop management on Netware open enterprise 6.5sp7
Problem Before: I have 500 computer with Intel Board running imaging correctly in "C1 pxe rules or manuel "put an image on this workstation on next boot" via the workstation object and ctrl-alt bash mode #img. Dell 760optiplex cannot run correctly imaging with "C1 pxe rules or manuel" or ctrl-alt. (nothing appear and the pxe boot local)
Fix with ZDM7SP1IR4_HP2.zip
Problem after ZDM7SP1IR4_HP2.zip: Dell 760 optiplex run correctly in "C1 pxe rules or manuel".but 500 computer with intel board cannot imaging with "c1 rules or put an image on this workstation on next boot" via the workstation object "except ctrl-alt run manuel in bash mode by tapping img one by one.
since 5 year I never have problem with this server

I see when i unload zenpxe.nlm the file "DTS.NLM" date 2009 I restore My old file "DTS.NLM 66,4 Ko 2008-09-07 and you no what... everything 500 intel pc work !
THE OLD GOOD ONE IS DTS.nlm 67ko 2008-09-07 22H18
THE NEW BAD One is DTS.nlm 68ko 2009-09-03 01:29
The ZDM7SP1IR4_HP2 is broken service pack.....

Similar Messages

Anyone else having to re-do Mail Rules after MobileMe updates?

Hi, everyone. After making the MobileMe updates, my mail wasn't being filtered to the right folders. I saw that I had to reset the rules and was wondering if anyone else experienced the same issues? There was a 2nd update that happened yesterday, and I had to go through the same process of re-directing my Mail Rules again this morning. I was able to fix things manually, but does anyone know of a way where we don't have to keep resetting our Mail Rules after future MobileMe updates? Thanks!

Waves79 wrote:
@GreenRobot
which LTE app do you use? does this work for you and your connectivity issues?
i have the LTE OnOff app and it only allows switching between 3G and 4G which doesnt help with when the phone is stuck on 1x and im on a 'CDMA auto' setting, for example... switching to allow LTE doesn't change the connectivity to 4G, let alone 3G for that matter, when im only getting 1x in a 3G or 4G area... only a manual restart works... oh well
EDIT
actually, i can switch between all 3 options! sorry! will try this instead of a manual restart
I was using LTE on off but I have switched to Network both do the same thing and take you to the Phone Info menu that where you to change your preferred network type. I just like that Network has a cleaner looking icon and doesn't pop up instructions.
The CDMA auto setting is 1X so if that's what you have it set to you are only going to get 1X. The setting I use when I don't want to worry about losing connection is CDMA auto (PRL) and that will keep it on 3G unless 3G is unavailable. Sometime when I'm set to CDMA +LTE/EvDo auto I have problems with my phone hanging up on a poor or none existent 4G signal and wont switch to 3G that's when I will switch to CDMA auto (PRL) to get off the failing 4G signal. It usually takes a 10 seconds for the 3G to pop up. This is my experience with the Thunderbolt I know a lot of people are having different experiences and have their different trick but I find this works most of the time. Good luck

Missing Mail Rules after upgrade to 10.8.2 from 10.6.8

The title says it all, really - I just upgraded to 10.8.2 via the App Store from 10.6.8, and, after a long period of re-indexing my email, Mail.app opened up and all of my sorting rules were gone gone gone.
There doesn't seem to be an easily findable post on this already, so I'm adding one here. Does anyone have any advice?
thanks,
-j.
specs: MacBookPro, 2.53 GHz Intel Core i5

Ok, never mind: re-starting Mail solved the problem.

Issue with migrated transformation rule after transport

Hello all,
We have migrated couple of update rules and transfer rules to transformation rules. All the transformation rules are active in development environment.
The issue is when we transport these transformation rules to QA, one of the fields of datapacket dimension "RECORD" becomes &R1& in the global structure of start routine and therefore, transport fails in QA. Along with this we had another issue that if we add any additional fields in the cube or ODS structure, the global structure in start routine doesn't change after transport in QA. Basically, it seems like it doesn't do anything when we do transport.
We tried couple of things by transporting entire flow inclding target and source objects, we also tried transporting only transformation with overwrite mode. But none of the things worked. We also have logged the message with SAP.
SAP suggested us to open the QA environment and perform the change manually. We did it and obviously we could activate the transformation rules. But when we tried to re-transport the transformation, it is keep failing with the error "Syntax Error". My assumption has after the transport, the field has become &R1& again.
Has anybody faced such issue? We are on Ehp1 SP7.
- Danny

Thanks Murali,
Yes as I mentioned SAP suggested us to open the box and do it manually, but once we are done with the manual changes, we tried transporting the same transformation rule again, which I guess going to be the case in case of any future enhancement. Transport failed and it says "Syntax Error".
The transformations we activated manually in the target system are active, but when we try to load the data, it throws the exception error.
Any clue ?? Is it working fine in your system after you did manual changes? Did all future transport go well ?
- Danny

Mail rules after iCloud

Is there a way of copying mail rules in one mac to keep them alive on my macs after iCloud?
I would appreciate any help,
Thanks!
mario Lordeiro

Nope. One of the reasons I'm sticking with MobileMe for as long as I can
Let Apple know that you would like this feature put back in.
http://www.apple.com/feedback/icloud.html

Mail App delete rules after a few time

Hi,
Every time i write a rule in Mail app, it disappear a few minutes after and only the default Apple rule keep living.
Someone have the same problem ?
Another icloud sync issue ?
Any fix ?
Thanks.

This started happening to me only recently. Same hardware, no OS update - most obvious thing I'd changed recently is that I'd gone from having one (enabled) mail account to two. Previously it was just one Exchange account, and the new account is a Google IMAP account. I'm going to test to see if the problem goes away when I disable *either* of them (suggesting the problem is in how Mail.app handles multiple enabled accounts) or if I must specifically disable the Google IMAP account (suggesting the problem is specifically in how Mail.app handles Google and/or IMAP).

Disable business rules after workflow promote

Dear All,
I have the following case:
in capex module, after everything finished, the user then promote the budget.
and that makes the data form read only. but in this case, because adding new asset is done by business rules, the user could still add new asset.
is there anyone have a solutions or experience the same thing?
Regards,
Feri

Ya that will be a tricky one.
The only general comment is to build this into your process.
So you will give everyone a window to add To Be Hires during 1 or 2 week period. Then you block everyone and remove the ability to launch the script. Then managers review. So this becomes disconnected from "workflow" the tool inside of Planning.
You could build something but this would be way outside the out of the box process and I wouldn't want to go there personally. You would move the calc into a maxl script and build in code to validate against the workflow tables to see if the calc will work or not. This would require all sort of validate scripting and error handling and would require bring in some experts probably. The only other scenario is to troll the forums and maybe find someone how built something like this and get them to share their code.
In principal what you want sounds obvious and make sense to be in the tool.

Problem with rules after migration

After migration of some mailboxes from Exchange 2007 to 2010 we have a problem managing rules. When trying to create or look at rules from OWA we get an Mapi error (See below). Also, When checking the problem user rules from Exchange Management
Console "get-inboxrule -mailbox <User>", it fails with a Doctor Watson error (also below) Witch is similar to the one from OWA.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Mapi Error:
MapiExceptionNotFound: Unable to query table rows. (hr=0x8004010f, ec=-2147221233) Diagnostic context: Lid: 55847 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc called [length=104] Lid: 43559 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc returned [ec=0x0][length=1366][latency=15] Lid: 23226 --- ROP Parse Start --- Lid: 27962 ROP: ropGetRulesTable [63] Lid: 27962 ROP: ropSetColumns [18] Lid: 27962 ROP: ropQueryRows [21] Lid: 31418 --- ROP Parse Done --- Lid: 55847 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc called [length=53] Lid: 43559 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc returned [ec=0x0][length=168][latency=0] Lid: 23226 --- ROP Parse Start --- Lid: 27962 ROP: ropLtidFromId [67] Lid: 17082 ROP Error: 0x8004010F Lid: 17505 Lid: 21921 StoreEc: 0x8004010F Lid: 27962 ROP: ropExtendedError [250] Lid: 1494 ---- Remote Context Beg ---- Lid: 26426 ROP: ropLtidFromId [67] Lid: 43747 dwParam: 0x5 Lid: 55653 StoreEc: 0x8004010F Lid: 1750 ---- Remote Context End ---- Lid: 26849 Lid: 21817 ROP Failure: 0x8004010F Lid: 30894 Lid: 24750 StoreEc: 0x8004010F Lid: 29358 Lid: 27950 StoreEc: 0x8004010F Lid: 32190 Lid: 21950 StoreEc: 0x8004010F Lid: 27070 Lid: 22974 StoreEc: 0x8004010F Lid: 18686 Lid: 1136 StoreEc: 0x8004010F Lid: 24318 Lid: 32510 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Doctor Watson:
WARNING: An unexpected error has occurred and a Watson dump is being generated: MapiExceptionNotFound: Unable to query
table rows. (hr=0x8004010f, ec=-2147221233)
Diagnostic context:
Lid: 55847 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc called [length=104]
Lid: 43559 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc returned [ec=0x0][length=1366][latency=15]
Lid: 23226 --- ROP Parse Start ---
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropGetRulesTable [63]
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropSetColumns [18]
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropQueryRows [21]
Lid: 31418 --- ROP Parse Done ---
Lid: 55847 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc called [length=53]
Lid: 43559 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc returned [ec=0x0][length=168][latency=0]
Lid: 23226 --- ROP Parse Start ---
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropLtidFromId [67]
Lid: 17082 ROP Error: 0x8004010F
Lid: 17505
Lid: 21921 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropExtendedError [250]
Lid: 1494 ---- Remote Context Beg ----
Lid: 26426 ROP: ropLtidFromId [67]
Lid: 43747 dwParam: 0x5
Lid: 55653 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 1750 ---- Remote Context End ----
Lid: 26849
Lid: 21817 ROP Failure: 0x8004010F
Lid: 30894
Lid: 24750 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 29358
Lid: 27950 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 32190
Lid: 21950 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 27070
Lid: 22974 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 18686
Lid: 1136 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 24318
Lid: 32510 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
MapiExceptionNotFound: Unable to query table rows. (hr=0x8004010f, ec=-2147221233)
Diagnostic context:
Lid: 55847 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc called [length=104]
Lid: 43559 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc returned [ec=0x0][length=1366][latency=15]
Lid: 23226 --- ROP Parse Start ---
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropGetRulesTable [63]
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropSetColumns [18]
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropQueryRows [21]
Lid: 31418 --- ROP Parse Done ---
Lid: 55847 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc called [length=53]
Lid: 43559 EMSMDBPOOL.EcPoolSessionDoRpc returned [ec=0x0][length=168][latency=0]
Lid: 23226 --- ROP Parse Start ---
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropLtidFromId [67]
Lid: 17082 ROP Error: 0x8004010F
Lid: 17505
Lid: 21921 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 27962 ROP: ropExtendedError [250]
Lid: 1494 ---- Remote Context Beg ----
Lid: 26426 ROP: ropLtidFromId [67]
Lid: 43747 dwParam: 0x5
Lid: 55653 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 1750 ---- Remote Context End ----
Lid: 26849
Lid: 21817 ROP Failure: 0x8004010F
Lid: 30894
Lid: 24750 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 29358
Lid: 27950 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 32190
Lid: 21950 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 27070
Lid: 22974 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 18686
Lid: 1136 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
Lid: 24318
Lid: 32510 StoreEc: 0x8004010F
+ CategoryInfo : NotSpecified: (:) [Get-InboxRule], MapiExceptionNotFound
+ FullyQualifiedErrorId : Microsoft.Mapi.MapiExceptionNotFound,Microsoft.Exchange.Management.RecipientTasks.GetInb
oxRule
-FireLite

Hi,FireLite,
What kind of the migration?
If it was cross forest or involved PST files then rules rarely come across correctly and should be recreated.
If it was simply install Exchange 2010 and use move mailbox, then rules should have moved with the mailbox.And please provide more information like below:
1)Does this rule problem happen to all moved mailboxes or just part of them?
2)Would you please verify that you have successfully moved these problem mailbox?
3)Can you manage the rule in outlook for them?Have you tried to create a new rule to see if it works for these mailbox in OWA or Outlook?
Please try to move the mailbox back to Exchange 2007,then move it to another mailstore,after that migrate it again to Exchange 2010 to see if it works.
And here are some resolved cases with similar error for your reference.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchange2010/thread/3c795b8f-0b60-4346-b8f1-eb8c4f9c9cb0
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/exchangesvradminlegacy/thread/3cf2360f-0a4c-4c7e-87c9-6726e3dc34fd
Regards,
Sharon
Sharon Shen
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question.

Activity of settlement rule after closing of IO

Hello,
i have that case: I closed one IO, after that i run the transaction KOSRLIST_OR and the status of the settlement is ACT. Please advise hot to deactivate that IO.Is it normal after closing of IO to have that kind of status?
Thank you in advance!

Hi Sri Ram,
I had done same thing as you mentioned, I had assigned settlement rule in project definition. I had selected copy from superior WBS element system is showing same error " Superior WBS element not found and nor automatic settlement rule is created after saving project.
Regards,
Varun Maheshwari

IPFW losing rules after reboot

I am trying to block port 137 UDP and TCP and after I reboot the rules are gone. I run the following commands:
sudo ipfw add 1 deny tcp from any to any 137 out
sudo ipfw add 2 deny udp from any to any 137 out
Before a reboot I run sudo ipfw list and things look great.....reboot and run it again and I just see the default rule.
Probably a stupid question, but I can't find the answer anywhere and I am a noob with ipfw. And Leopard just mixes the whole process up as well with ipfw and its new application firewall.
So I guess my questions are: Why do the rules disappear? How do I get the rules to stay?
Thanks,
Dan

Hi
It sounds like you need to configure a startup script without a startup script when you reboot your computer- the computer "forgets" the ipfw rules
You can google the search terms : "ipfw startup script " "launch daemons ipfw " " ipfw rules gone after reboot" "shell script launch firewall rules ipfw" "ipfw startup plist " -OR-
You can use WATERROOF waterroof is a free application that will help you configure your ipfw rules waterroof will also install a startup script and a startup plist on your hard drive
Check out this link to the waterroof website
http://www.hanynet.com/waterroof/
Hope This Helps

"Error when activating update rule" after changing ODS key

Hi Gurus,
I have problem when transporting in productive system an existing ODS & the update rule linked. The message is : "Error when activating update rule".
This is when i move one field from the key to a simple field of the ODS.
Before transporting requests, i deleted data in the ODS by right-click on ODS --> Request tab --> select the request --> click on delete....
I don't understand because i did the same in Qual environment and everything is OK : transport request & ODS loading...
Please help.....

Hello,
Please try to check/perform the following steps:
1- You must ensure for the update rule have mapping between infosources
   and ODS/CUBEs correct, this means that also these objects need
   to be of the same version in the source system of the transport as in
   target system.
2- Please ensure all infoobjects in the cube are active.Please
   reactivate all the objects again in source system.
3- Ensure all infoobjects are found in the communication structure.
4- Please try to collect the update rule via BW transport connection
   with the grouping option "only necessary objects" and then transport
   those objects again.
Could you please reactivate the infocube and its update rules again
and then create a new transport for this infocube and transport it
again.
Best regards,
Paula Csete

Error when activating update rule after transporting to QA

Hi,
When we transport Info cubes and update rules along with Process chains. There are the following errors in Transport request(XXXXXXXX).
1. Error when activating update rule 22HSFD3ZMALU46LS0R8PRF2MW
IC=ZSDPCXY2 IS=2LIS_11_VAITM error when checking the update rules
2. Error when activating update rule 7NT4WIDPDCN2ERFDRXIGH95PM
IC=ZSDPCXY2 IS=2LIS_12_VCHDR error when checking the update rules
and etc.
Then we activated and saved all the erroneous update rules in another tranport request(YYYYYYYY) and again we transported alongwith the previous transport request(XXXXXXXX).
The last request(YYYYYYYY)was successfully tranported and still there are same errors in TR(XXXXXXXX).
Quick answers will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Vijay

Hi Vijay,
Next time you would have transport only (YYYYYYYY). Transport Request (XXXXXXX) was not required to be moved.
Normally Update Rule gets deactivated in QA when any changes to the CUbe/ODS are moved.
Thus either you can transport transport request for only active update rule to QA or activate your UR directly in QA system in case you have authorization to do that.
Regards,
Rohini

Mail does not obey rules after 10.4.9 upgrade

Hello Helpers,
Can't no get Mail to obey rules set-up for one of my several email account as before. Even deleted the com.apple.mail.plist and set up accounts all over, including rules, adding new header "subject must" Contains a certain word. Problem did not resolved.
What to do? Help please! I should not have to delete emails that should not be in the account inbox. I did not have this problem in earlier versions.
Ralston
Powerbooks G4/1.04 & G3 Lombard-400 & PB3400 Mac OS X (10.4.9)

Hello Guys,
I found the solution. Use mulitple rules for the account. I had follishly thought that each account could only have one rule. By setting up another rule that says "does not contain" the certain "word", move to trach, resolved the issue.
It nice to answer my own question, inspite of the fustration in learning. What a way to learn! I am happy to share.
Ralston
Powerbooks G4/1.04 & G3 Lombard-400 & PB3400 Mac OS X (10.4.7)

Why is implicit deny missing from outside int incoming access rules after upgrade from 8.25 to 9.1?

i have just noticed that after upgarde of image and asdm to 911 and 711, the implicit deny acl is missing from the outside interface. Is this deliberate or a poor upgrade. i am upgrading from 8.25 normally, depends what the reseller sends me.
should this be happening or am i upgrading in too large a jump?
thanks,
david

Hi,
Would really see some screencapture / output of the thing you are referring to.
I imagine that you are perhaps referring to something related to ASDM? I dont personally really use ASDM at all for ASA configurations to I am not up to date on the possible problems it might have or changes made to its interface.
I am not sure if you have an ACL attached to the "outside" interface? If so then I think the ASDM should show the Implicit Deny at the end while this wont show on the CLI side at all.
I did just check my own ASA at home which is running 9.0(2) and ASDM 7.1(2) at the moment and it doesnt show an Implicit Deny for my LAN or WAN interfaces ACL.
Though the basic ACL operation is still in effect. If its not allowed in the ACL then its blocked by Implicit Deny. This can be confirmed with "packet-tracer" test on your firewall also.
- Jouni

Not showing top 10 access rule after upgrade to 9.1(5)

Hi
I have recently upgraded ASA 5505 from 8.2 to 9.1 and the ASDM to 7.3 but I can no longer can view the Top 10 Access Rules on the home tab. Is it a bug or do I have to enable anything?
I hope someone can help.

Hi Andre
for security reasons I cannot give you the Access rules page. FYI the logging is enabled
However in the home page , when I click on show rule it says the following
Unable to determine corresponding access rule The configuration in ASDM may be out of sync with the device. Please refreah configuration and try again
I refreshed the screen and no change. Welcome any advise.

Localboot rules after ZDM7SP1IR4_HP2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for