LOCATOR CONTROL품목이 NULL로 입고되었을 때 DATAFIX방법

제품 : MFG_INV
작성날짜 : 2005-05-30
LOCATOR CONTROL품목이 NULL로 입고되었을 때 DATAFIX방법
==========================================
PURPOSE
Locator Control이 "Prespecified"로 setup되어 있음에도 불구하고,
Locator=NULL로 입고되는 Inventory Itemd에 대한 datafix방법을
제시하고자 합니다.
Explanation
Valid Locator ID로 다음 Table들에 Update작업을 수행하여야 합니다.
(1) MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS
update MTL_MATERIAL_TRANSACTIONS
set locator_id = <valid locator id)
where transaction_id= &trxid
and locator_id is NULL
=====================================
(2) MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES_DETAIL
update MTL_ONHAND_QUANTITIES
set locator_id = <valid locator id)
where inventory_item_id=&itemid
and organization_id = &orgid
and subinventory_code = &subcode
and locator_id is NULL
=======================================
(3) RCV_TRANSACTIONS
update RCV_TRANSACTIONS
set locator_id = <valid locator id)
where transaction_id= &trxid
and locator_id is NULL
Example
Reference Documents
Note:181604.1

Similar Messages

  • Locator control subinventory

    Hi All,
    we have a X subinventory which is locator cotrol as prespecified
    in that subinventory one item has onhand quantity 10 and items as locator_id is null in onhand quantity table
    when we trying to issue out the quatiyt we couldnot do it because locator field is mondatory in mic transaction because suninventory is locator control
    but item doesnot have locator id in onhand quantity table
    please advice me how can i issue out hte quantity.
    Thanks
    Anu.

    No.

  • Storage Location Control and ATP

    Hello Experts,
    I have activated the storage location control for the putaway process and is working fine for MM and WM perspective. The following are happening without any problem:
    1. Doing a GR to the virtual Storage Location and this storage location is blank in TR.
    2. The stock from the virtual storage location is considered in MRP while planning.
    3. TO creation from TR and doing putaway in real storage bin and Transfer posting 311 at IM level.
    The requirement is: The stock from the virtual storage location should not be considered in the ATP while creating a sales order. At the moment, ATP is considering this stock as available and confirming to a date immediately but in reality it should not up until the putaway is complete. And I think this is the sole purpose of having Storage Location Control in place.
    I did my research in this fourm and looked at the Warehouse Management Guide and it says "This means that for the duration of the putaway process, the stock for putaway is either not visible at all or clearly visible as stock that can not be picked, depending on the configuration of the availability check."
    Can someone help me understand what to check or uncheck in ATP? Or should I post this question in the ERP-SD forum?
    Appreciate you help.
    Regards
    Narottam

    Hi,
    I believe your mistake is here:
    "800 K15 0800 8001 411 check box is checked "
    The combination should read
    800 902 0800 8001
    The storage type is the interim storage type, that is where the posting shall happen. And if you leave out the check box it happens automatically.
    But why movement type 411? This usually should be 311.
    Best regards
    Juergen

  • Just recently I am getting the following error message when trying to access web sites. I get a pop up window stating "Exc in ev handl: TypeError: c.location is null" then I have to click ok. It is an issue with some plug-in?

    Just recently I am getting the following error message when trying to access web sites. I am using Firefox browser version 10.0.2. I get a pop up window stating "Exc in ev handl: TypeError: c.location is null" as the web site page is being displayed in browser winder. Then I have to click ok. It doesn't matter what web link/site I go to it happens. It is an issue with some plug-in?

    I have advised McAfee's product team of the problem and this thread, and they're looking into it now.

  • Storage location control

    Hi,
    Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.
    To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
    We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
    number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
    Please advice.
    With regards,
    Prabhakar

    >
    prabhakar pisapati wrote:
    > Hi,
    >
    > Based on our current requirement, the moment we create a sales order, an out bound delivery and TO should get create automatically, if stock is available. We are successfully acheiving this functionality. But system is creating out bound deliveries for the stock in GR interim area, and failing to create TO, since stock is not available in WH.

    > To avoid this, we are trying to use storage location control functionality. With this process we are facing below two problems.
    >
    > We could not able set up configuration for multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type
    > number two the GR reversal process (with mvt 102) is not working. It is working when we do not confirm the TO which got created due GR posting with mvt 101. But when we confirm the TO and try to cancel material document in IM, WM process not completing.
    >
    > Please advice.
    >
    > With regards,
    >
    > Prabhakar
    Your cycle is: Sales order -> outbound delivery (automatic) -> picking of outbound delivery (automatic) -> Confirmation of TO (automatic).
    It appears that in your system, the GR interim area is a separate storage location, and the warehouse is in a different storage location. So your technique of setting picking storage location is correct. 
    The IM movement in standard is 601, and the WM movement is also 601 During picking, the system is trying to pick up stock from the storage type mentioned in the storage type search strategy. If stocks are present there, then a TO will get created and confirmed.
    It is not clear why you require multiple IM movemnt type for a storage type. I am afraid I havent understood your current setup.
    Problem 2: GR reversal not working
    When a GR is done, a 101 IM movement calls a 101 WM movement, and the stock gets moved to a storage type based on the search strategy. When this is cancelled via 102, a 102 WM movement is triggered (in standard). In case this is not happening in your system then you will have to check the problem.
    Try posting the 102 movement material document, and then create the TO against the mat doc using LT06. You will be able to see the problem (TR not created / immediate TO creation not configured / immediate confirmation not set).
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • WM Storage Location control problem - no TR created in receiving warehouse

    Hi all,
    I have configured the system to perform a 311 mvt from sloc 4002 to sloc 0010. Both Slocs have different warehouse numbers assigned.
    The transfer is working fine, however in the receiving warehouse no TR is being generated even though I am using the standard *** 311 movement type which has create TR flag set.
    If I disable the config and perform the 311 in MIGO after confirming the TR in the sending warehouse, the stock is moved to the new warehouse and a TR is created.
    Has anyone experienced this before?
    Mark

    2nd entry in storage location control is ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311 
    1st case:The entry.e. ZF2 501 DE01 0010 311  seems to be wrong.
    Your warehouse storage location 0010 is managed with ZF4 and not ZF2.
    But in this case, the way you created entries concludes that you want to transfer the stock from one Sloc to other Sloc which have separate warehouses.
    i feel your approach to excute this scenario seems to be not a valid one. I don't understand why you are running this process as WM transaction followed by IM document. You said that you are creating the transfer order first.. must be with wm mvt 311 in LT01. Standard WM mvt 311 doesn't allows manual TO creation.Your both storage locations are assigned to different warehouses. You should post the movement in IM first, then follow the WM activities.
    2nd case:If you say that ZF2 is correct, then your storage location is wrong, it should be  4002 instead of 0010  and you are transferring stock from one storage type to other storage within same warehouse.
    If you want to do this scenarion as WM followed by IM, then please change the Wm mvt 311 in ZF2 to allow manual TO creation.
    In movement type properties, set the destination storage type as 501.
    Strorage location control should be ZF2 501 DE01 4002 311
    Please let me know your thoughts on this.
    Regards,
    Santosh

  • Reg Storage location control when pulled materials via fixed bin replenishm

    We are Using Storagelocation Control Functionality in WM
    We have below Storage locations
    RW01 - Raw Material Storing
    PD01 - Materials staged for Production Lines
    I have setup RW01 as Standard Storage location and PD01 as 'not copied to TR'
    When i try to do bin to bin tranfer raw material to production lines From Bin in RW01 to Bin in PD01, TO has RW01 as expected, i Run posting change background job and this functionality is working fine
    We would be using Fixed bin replenishment strategy to stage materials for productions from raw materials storage
    I run LP21 for PD01, it has created TR but has storage location PD01 instead of RW01.
    PD01 shouldnt have copied as i have set 'Not to be copied to TR' for PD01
    Fixed bin replenishment doesnt support storage location control? does we need to go for customization ?
    Please help

    Please help
    Bin to Bin is working fine as per storage location control functionality set-up
    We have issue with fixed bin replenishment combined with storage location control
    Please share your inputs, Thank you
    While debugging we relaixed SAP doesnt check storage location control config at all while doing fixed bin replenishment, only custom solution to force system to check storage location control config and assign storage location is TR?
    Edited by: Sasi nagireddy on Jul 18, 2011 8:34 AM

  • Storage location control, storage location ref.

    Hello all,
    I am new in WM,
    Can anyone please explain me the  *_Storage location control function_*  and *Storage location ref* with the exmple in detail.
    Go for this path if required:-
    Spro-- log execution-- warehouse mang- interfaces inventory mang-- Define storage location control..
    Please help me...
    Abhinay Waikar.

    Hi,
    I;'ve used it for the following:
    Standard inbound deliveries to be received in storage location 1000. After finishing the TO in WM, the material is transferred from SLOC 1000 to 1010. In the sales orders, 1010 is taken into account and 1000 is disregarded. I.e. stock in 1000 is not seen as available.
    In this case available stock is indeed available, also in WM.
    MdZ

  • Plant n storage location control

    Hi all,
    how can we control the plant and storage location control?
    If I creaet PO for one plant, I must not create PO to other plant.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You have created PO for ONE plant only, but one plant have multiple storage location and also created PO to multiple storage location in one purchase order based on authorization.
    Plant and storage location control through authorization of create,edit/change,display,print  of PO.
    Hope, it is useful for you.
    Regards,
    K.Rajendran

  • Storage Location Control at customer level

    Dear All,
    Need a Customer wise Storage location control.
    Eg.
    Customer Name: ABCD
    Storage Location: FG01
    Customer Name: WXYZ
    Storage Location: FG02
    Regards,
    Saravanan E

    Hi,
    I am not sure but Explore STOCK DETERMINATION topic,
    IMG >> MM >> Inventory management & Physicl inventory >> Define strstegies for stock determination
    where define stock determination group and Rule
    Assign it header and Item level
    On item level maintain storage location and for FG01 - put priority 1 and FG02 - Put priority 2
    Assign stock determination rule to Application - Delivery.
    check whether it works with batch.
    I also update you if working fine.
    Kapil

  • Which SAP module for static location control in warehouse management ?

    Hello,
    can someone please help me answering this question:
    One of our warehouses is managed with location. One item can be stocked in more than one location, but the user decides which location he puts the item in. We do not need dynamic location control.
    Do you think we can manage this with the modules we plan to implement (MM, SD, PP, FI, CO), or do we absolutely need a new module (WM) ?
    Thanks in advance for yourr help.
    Regis

    Dear Regis,
    If using the Warehouse Management System, a storage location can be further defined down to the bin level.
    Although it is possible for you to manage warehouse inventories using the Inventory Management (IM) application component, the primary difference between managing stock in WM and in IM is that in IM, the system can only display the total stock of a material for a storage location. If a warehouse is small and easily manageable, then the use of IM may be sufficient to fulfill your needs.
    WM, on the other hand, offers the capability to manage stock quantities in each individual storage bin in highly complex storage facilities. This means that, with WM, you can optimize the use of all storage bins, mix pallets belonging to several owners in randomly slotted warehouses and know exactly where a particular material is located in the warehousing complex at all times.
    The bottom line is it all depends on various facrors including budget, complexity etc.
    Regards,
    Naveen.

  • Cannot change Locator Control when defining new Subinventory

    Hi,
    I'm trying to create a new subinventory, in R12.1.3, and can't change the Locator Control field which is set to Preprecified. The option is grayed out/locked.
    In the Inventory organization parameters the Locator Control is set to "determined on subinventory level", but any chage doesn't affect the option in the subinentory.
    Can anyone pls explain why?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    once check the attributes in inv tab of master-item form.
    Regards

  • Locator Control

    Hello,
    locatorControl.setText("120121");
    not changed locatorControl text.
    not run. What is problem;
    Help me.
    Thanks.
    null

    Exactly what it says on the tin:
    If you've pick released an order line and Oracle has created picking suggestions/allocations which reference the locator you're looking at, clearly it would cause problems if you then moved the stock out of that location prior to pick confirming.
    Similarly, if you are trying to move stock out of a locator-controlled staging location, Oracle Shipping could be in the process of creating the inventory sales order issue transaction.
    However, unless your Inventory Trip Stop is stuck, you'd be unlucky to hit the second scenario so I suspect yours is the first - i.e. you have an untransacted pick release which you will need to cancel the allocation for first if you want to move that stock.

  • ITunes Music Locations - controlling workstations remotely via script?

    I do storage administration at a company with over 2000 users scattered across the globe. Predictably, at least have use iTunes. We redirect the "My Documents" folder to a network location to force the backup of critical project data. This creates a huge problem for us. iTunes defaults to using the My Music folder in My Documents. This means we are storing and backing up at least 1TB of music.
    I have found that iTunes stores its configuration in xml files in the application data directory in the user profile. I cannot readily figure out where in this file the location is recorded.
    Has anyone confronted this problem, and if so, is there a way to control iTunes installs remotely to set the music folder location, via script, GPO or anything at all?

    The library location is indeed stored in the iTunesPrefs.xml file. Look for the key "iTunes Library Location:1".
    But I have a script that almost does what you want. Here is the perl source:
    http://home.comcast.net/~teridon73/itunesscripts/itunesopenlibrary.txt
    Here is a compiled EXE for it:
    http://home.comcast.net/~teridon73/itunesscripts/itunesopenlibrary.zip
    Anyway, the script basically works by setting the library location to a path that you pass to it. It does so by updating the iTunesPrefs.xml file. This file is very small, so you shouldn't need to worry about it!
    Of course, the script only works if the iTunesPrefs.xml file already exists. It would be nice if you could include a template iTunesPrefs.xml in your new user creation/login script. If the path is the same for every user, well, then you're done I guess.
    If not, you can run the script to set the path to what you really want it to be.
    Existing users are a different story. You can run my script to change the library location, of course. But then you also have to move their existing library file and their music back to that location. Well, you don't have to; you can make the users do it themselves! Also, I don't know if that will work as I haven't tested it.
    I haven't fully explained everything, but I don't have time right now. I hope at least I've given you some ideas. Of course the optimum solution is an Apple-provide GPO you could use. You can try asking apple for it via either a bugreport (if you have an ADC account), or the feedback page for iTunes:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/itunesapp.html
    Rob

  • Problem with Locating controls in UI Control Map

    Hi everyone,
    I am having a very weird problem and have no idea what's going on. I am working on creating some Coded UI tests and I have noticed that, on my machine, when I go to a .uitest file, right click on one of the controls in the UI Control Map list, and select
    Locate the UI Control, the blue box always shows up about 2 inches up and 4 inches to the left of the specified control. Also, when I try to generate a new map by dragging the target tool to the app, it doesn't find the control correctly, but also appears
    to think the app is open in a different location than it actually is. The weirdest thing though, is that this functionality seems to work fine with web pages. It's only when I try to use it on a windows app that it has a problem. Any ideas?
    Thanks in advance,
    Aaron Sellers

    Hi Aaron Sellers,
    According to your description, could you please tell me detailed steps how you generate a new map
    in the coded UI test?
    Generally, when we want to add new UI control in the UI Control Map list, we can right-click the
    CodedUITest method->Generate Code for Coded UI Test->Using Coded UI test builder like the following screen shot.
    Or we can also right-click the UIMap.uitest->Edit With Coded UI Test Builder like the following
    screen shot.
    So I suggest you can try the above suggestion to check your issue again.
    In addition, as you said that the weirdest thing though, is that this functionality seems to work
    fine with web pages. It's only when I try to use it on a windows app that it has a problem. Any ideas?
    I have been reproduced this issue in my side, I found that we can use the Locate the UI Control function
    to find the control for a windows app.
    So to further help you solve this issue, I suggest you can told me more detailed message about your
    issue.
    Best Regards,
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

Maybe you are looking for