Lock Box Issue - Test Program RFEBLBT2

I am trying to create some test data for my lockbox config. Does anyone know what this program creates? I thought it creates receipts data.
As a pre-requisite I created an invoice via FB70. Then I created some test data via RFEBLBT2 and used t code FLB2 to post this test data saved in a text file.
The information seems to post "ON ACCOUNT" and does not clear the receivable.
Can someone please help me?
thanks so much
Brian

Similar Messages

Credits & lock box issues in SAP XI

Hi All,
what is the credits & lock box issues in SAP XI....? can any body explain me in detail and how to solve all these credits and lockbox issues...
Thanks
Sudheer

Sudheer,
I dont think you have any issues with these files. These files are sent to the Bank. Just google for help on these files. If you are expecting in detail explanation then I think you should give us few inputs.
Regards,
---Satish

Lock box issue

Hi ,
When i upload lockbox file through FLB2 i am getting the message
"Accounts receivable posting Error: (F5 102) Customer * is not defined in company code XXXX".
In the upload file i have metnioned the bank deatils of the customer and this customer have open items.
can you please suggest what changes do i need to make in the upload file to overcome this issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Ajay,
Thanks for the reply. Now i managed to identify the customer by changing the upload file and its creating two documents
I.e
Doc. (G/L) and Doc. (AR)
but i am getting the follwing error now..
"Accounts receivable posting Error: (F5 263) The difference is too large for clearing"
Can you please let me know what might be problem for this.
Thanks in advance.

Since I've installed Mountain Lion, I am having lock up issues with multiple programs. MS Outlook has crashed and I've lost all my folders. HELP?

Since I've installed Mountain Lion, I am having lock up issues with multiple programs. MS Outlook has crashed and I've lost all my folders. HELP?

okay I've finally been able to get tor and all the other programs to work according to my plan the only thing that's still making problems is that iptables doesn't work as I want it to, when I start chromium without proxy settings privoxy doesn't seem to forward the information to polipo.. do I need to add another rule to iptables.rules in order for the program to know it has to reroute the information again or how can I get this to work? and is there any way to run rtorrent with proxy support?
anyway, problem 2 and 3 are still to be solved.
and does anybody know where i can get a good dansguardian blacklist that was not designed for 6 year old children and for which I don't need to subscribe? I'm still getting these partypoker popups -.-
//e: with iptables it's the same thing as described in the first post. https works, http doesnt. I get the output "Invalid header received from client." on http sites. still no idea why though.. (and the https-version of torcheck.xenubite says i'm tor unprotected while starting the browser with iptables)
Last edited by deF291 (2011-04-23 16:16:31)

Lock Box Uploading Issue

Hi,
When i upload BAI file into Lock Box...I am getting the below error in FBL2 transaction.
Accounts receivable posting Error: (F5 102) Customer * is not defined in company code 1000
After that when i see in to FBL1,I am getting the below error.
Payment Advise item doesnot exist
Payment advice 010000007500001 does not exist for account 9372 1000
Message no. FA006
Kindly help me what is the problem and why i am not able to upload it successfully?
Thanks
Kishore

I am experiencing the same issue.
I am wondering how you went about in correcting this issue
Thanks

Lock Box config

Hi All,
I am trying to config the lock box with 'Define lockbox for house banks' but i could not proceed to config the lockbox, system saying message : '(House Bank) does not exits in T012', does it mean that we have to setup house bank first before proceeding to defining lockbox?
Anyone could guide me what are necessary steps to setup the Lockbox
Thank you in advance
Thanks
raj

Hi
House bank set up is necessary for lock box config. Below are the steps involved in lockbox config:
A. Basic Steps in Configuring the Lockbox
1.     Maintain Control Parameters -OBAY
2.     Maintain Posting Data - OBAX
3.     Create Lockbox Addresses for House Banks - OB10 & FI12
B. Steps in processing of the Lockbox files
1.     Test Data Generation for the Lockbox Program - RFEBLBT2 and RFEBLBT3.
2.     Importing of the Lockbox file - FLB2
3.     Display the documents posted -
4.     Post Processing - FLB1
VVR

Real Estate Lock Box Key

I have owned three Palms and now on my 4th.
The very first one,second one and third was able to be integrated with the software/programming to be installed into my phone for the ability to open realtor lock boxes. ALL Palms have infrared so once installed at my local board of realtors I am good to go and I simply access the program on my Palm point the phone at the lock box and it opens... among other functions but this is the one most used.
Now I have just purchased a new Palm Pre and ONCE AGAIN I am told by GE Security that the NEW Palm will not function as a lockbox because of it's operating system. IS THIS TRUE ARE ARE THEY TELLING ME THE SAME THING THEY HAVE DONE IN THE PAST BECAUSE OF EITHER SOMETHING BETWEEN THE TWO COMPANIES IS LACKING IN GETTING THE PRODUCT READY OR IS IT TRUE THIS NEW PRE WILL NEVER BE COMPATIBLE FOR LOCK BOX KEY USAGE?
Need help... don't think this is a question for tech support in India!

Currently, realtors can use Blackberries to access supra lockboxes by using bluetooth technology and a fob which converts the bluetooth signal to an infrared signal. Will we soon have this capability with Palm Pre? I want to upgrade from my Palm Centro to the Palm Pre Plus, but may have to go with a Blackberry instead. Any information you can provide will be greatly appreciated!
This post desribes the situation well: https://developer.palm.com/distribution/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=364&view=previous
Consider this another request to enable the Pre for compatibility with the GE Supra eKey. For years Realtors have utilized the Treos as their Smartphone of choice due to its ability to unlock the lockboxes that hold the keys to the homes we show. Currently no such application is available for the Pre because the SDK stifles access to the Bluetooth interface that is needed to communicate with the lockboxes. Here is what the eKey people say regarding the issue:
"Unfortunately at this time support for the Palm Pre is not possible. The Palm Pre is the first device to use Palm's new "WebOS", and the Software Development Kit (or SDK) available at this time does not include adequate access to the Bluetooth interface on the phone. Because of this, and because the Palm Pre does not have an infrared port on it, we will not be able to certify it as an eKEY device. Hopefully in a future version of the SDK, the required Bluetooth Access will be made available to our programmers so that we can support this device."
Just about every Realtor I know uses a Palm phone, but now people who want to update and upgrade their phones are jumping ship to Blackberry due to this single issue. I'm sure that I don't have to remind you that Brand Loyalty is incredibly hard to earn, and everyday that the Pre does not have this function you will lose valuable customers and an entire niche of users.
I know that I am not the first to make this plea, but of all the research I have done, I have yet to find a response or even an acknowledgment from Palm. Please advise.

Test program running taking much more time on high end server T5440 than low end server T5220

Hi all,
I have written the following program and run on both T5440 [1.4 GHz, 95 GB RAM, 32 cores(s), 256 logical (virtual) processor(s),] and T5220 [(UltraSPARC-T2 (chipid 0, clock 1165 MH) , 8GB RAM, 1 core, 8 virtual processors )] on same OS version. I found that T5540 server takes more time than T5220. Please find below the details.
test1.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <pthread.h>
using namespace std;
#define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
struct ABCDEF {
char A[1024];
char B[1024];
void *start_func(void *)
    long long i = 6000;
    while(i--)
                ABCDEF*             sdf = new ABCDEF;
                delete sdf;
                sdf = NULL;
    return NULL;
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    pthread_t tid[50];
    for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
                pthread_create(&tid[i], NULL, start_func, NULL);
                cout<<"Creating thread " << i <<endl;
    for(int i=0; i<NUM_OF_THREADS; i++)
                pthread_join(tid[i], NULL);
                cout<<"Waiting for thread " << i <<endl;
After executing the above program on T5440 takes :
real 0.78
user 3.94s
sys 0.05
After executing the above program on T5220 takes :
real 0.23
user 1.43s
sys 0.03
It seems that T5440 which is high end server takes almost 3 times more time than T5220 which is low end server.
However, I have one more observation. I tried the following program :
test2.cpp
#include <iostream>
#include <pthread.h>
using namespace std;
#define NUM_OF_THREADS 20
struct ABCDEF {
char A[1024];
char B[1024];
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
    long long i = 6000000;
    while(i--)
        ABCDEF* sdf = new ABCDEF;
        delete sdf;
        sdf = NULL;
    return 0;
It seems that T5440 server is fast in this case as compaired to T5220 server.
Could anyone please help me out the exact reason for this behaviour as my application is slow as well on this T5440 server. I have posted earlier as well for the same issue.
Thanks in advance !!!
regards,
Sanjay

You already asked this question...
48 hours earlier, and in the same Solaris forum space
Repeating the post isn't going to get you a response any faster, and actually now have people NOT respond because you are not showing any patience.
These are end-user community forums, not a place to expect Oracle Technical Support.   There is no obligation that there be a response.
If you have a business-critical issue and hope to get accurate and timely response, then use your service contract credentials to open a Support request.
This new redundant post is locked.
Edit:
It appears that at the same time the O.P. posted this redundant thread, they also posted the same question to at least one other forum web site:
http://www.unix.com/solaris/229269-test-program-running-taking-much-more-time-high-end-server-t5440-than-low-end-server-t5220.html

Lock Box - item not getting cleared

Hi,
I m testing the lockbox process with the lock box file available online.
I could be able to import the file and document got created. But i have some doubts, please try to reply for the same.
1) payment advice got generated but the customer open item is still not cleared? do we need to process that further? the check status is applied and G/L document got posted.
2) I think we can also process lock box posting through Idoc, what is the process flow? would you pease eloberate on this IDOC process for lockbox.
3) I am not able to understand the posting done (without clearing the customer open item). Both debit and credit posted to a bank account. would you please eloberate the posting done while lockbox processing?
Please let me know if more information required.
Regards,

Hi,
If you are able to load the lockbox file then customer items shall be cleared. Please check the posting rule config and clearing accounts maintained for lockbox.
Thanks,
Sachin

Bit locker security issues (easy to crack) disk encryption?

Bit locker security issues (easy to crack) disk encryption?
Problem 1: When the PC run I think its too easy to get malicious users (with usb pendrive) or spyware to get the encryption key (fast and easy)
youtube.com/watch?v=0npTlOq6q_0
Problem2:not resistant with bruteforce attacks
youtube.com/watch?v=zvaJxnvbGic
Problem 3: not resistant with boot hacking
Im using DriveCrypt plus pack and searched security issues in bit locker.The bit locker allow you the bruteforce/dic attack easy.I think It would be much safer 1. (I think the keys stored somewhere that is easily read) 2. Do not just be enough password
need a password+file combination to decrypt the disk. DriveCrypt plus pack use a file+password combination if you know the password but you wont have the file you can not decrypt the disk (protect with bruteforce attack).On system boot protected bruteforce
attak you can crash the (boot).If the boot system crash you can not decrypt the disk just the password you need the file+password combination plus to decrypt it. I am not a programmer but I see the BitLocker ( easy security catches to crack the disk encryption).Im
tested DriveCrypt and I can not get the key that easy (Problem 1). I have not tested it in greater depth just trying to (catches to crack software encryption).

Where is your question, sir?
If the question were "is it easy to crack", the answer is "no". Your videos make use of several assumptions and ingredients and permissions that a normal attacker does not have.
"Problem 3" is not clear, please describe what scenario you are talking about.

Lock Box Reason Code.

Hi Experts,
I am getting one issue in lock box, If Suppose customer has invoice of $ 1000, he is eligible for discount of $ 50 so he should pay net amount $ 950. But customer is paying full amount without knowing that he is eligible for discount i.e $ 1000. so system is crediting back $ 50 to the customer(returning back the $ 50 to customer).
In this case i want system should accept amount $1000 and system should not credit $ 50 to customer(system should not pay back to customer $ 50), instead of this system should transfer the balance to GL account by using the reason code.
Note : we are using BAI2 format for lockbox.
Please be advised what should i do in this case if i want to accept the full amount from the customer without doing the credit to him and i want to transfer the amount to GL account by using reason code in BAI2 format.
Regards,
Sam.
Edited by: samiuk on Nov 11, 2011 4:23 PM

Yes you can.
Customer and User tolerance limits, payment advice tolerance limits and reason codes
When an incoming cash payment does not exactly pay the referenced open item(s), then the system will not be able to perform clearing without creating residual items back on the account - except when you establish tolerance limits to allow posting with a write-off of acceptable payment difference amounts.
Reason code settings are used for description and reporting purposes, generation of specific customer correspondence letters (automatic system generation whenever this reason code is assigned to a document), and difference item write-off/dispute status assignment.

Lock Box - Cleared items (Urgent please)

Hi all
Can anyone please help me getting a report, to get the below information.
1.How many customer invoices have been cleared through Lock Box Clearing program -- I wanted to findout how many customers have been cleared automatically (How can I findout this information - Tables/Field)
2. How many customer invoices were not able to be cleared due to tolerance error through Lock Box clearing program
Please help me in getting these detials
Thanks
Krishna

Hello,
1.How many customer invoices have been cleared through Lock Box Clearing program -- I wanted to findout how many customers have been cleared automatically (How can I findout this information - Tables/Field)
You can sort this in table BSAD based on Doc type...Idenity whether your document posted via Lockbox program has unique ID...else you can identify from the table BKPF header records <fields TCODE & BLART>.
Hope this helps
Rgds
Rajendra

Where's the surround sound test program gone?

With HD surround sound problems still ongoing for me, i need to run the test program again to try something, but I just can't find it anymore.
I've looked in all the obvious places - has it been erased?

Hi Spec_d,
To change the audio settings on the vision box please try the following:
Press BT Vision on the remote
Scroll right to Settings
Press Select
Select general settings
Highlight and select 'Digital audio output' from the options
Current Audio output is shown by the tick displayed next to the appropriate option
To change the audio output type, navigate to 'Stereo'. A tick will move to the desired audio output method selected. To confirm the changes made, highlight 'Save' and press select.
Let me know if this has helped you at all.
Cheers
Paddy,
BTCare Community Mod
If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)

Payment Advise error while uploading Lock box

Hi,
i am getting the below error in FBL1 transaction code. I am able to upload the lock box in FBL2 transaction with Appllied status. After that when i execute FBL1 transaction i am getting the below error related to Payment Advise. Kindly help me to fix this issue...
Payment advice 010000000700001 does not exist for account 237059 1000
Thanks
Kishore

Once the incoming payment is applied and the invoice is cleared the system would delete the payment advice immediately and you would get this error from FLB1, this is standard.

Lock Box file format

Hi All,
I need help on lock box upload file format.I created a test file using bank layout & FLB* structure tables and put a test data for a customer.and tried to process it in FLB2 using pc upload but system didnt select the customer open items.
The file contains details for Record type 1,2,4,5,6,7,8,9.and I dont know what else need to do ,could anyone please provide any guidance on file format?.Thanks
100YPCCDESTINYPCCORIGIN1106221714
2YPCCDESTINYPCCORIGIN000000000040008000801
50010001234567110622YPCCDESTINYPCCORIGIN
6001001000012614407100001300091524660000055555
400100160195590023784
700100012345671106220010000126144
8000000123456711062200010000126144
9000000
thats the file I created but not working.
Regards
Shaun

Hi,
Please refer this links:
how to create Lockbox test file?
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/ConceptofLockbox
Regards,
Pramitha.

Lock Box Issue - Test Program RFEBLBT2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for