Lock the manual consumption 261 against order

Hi,
we have observed wrong WIP post into order due to manual consumption 261 movement type against order through MB1A,
This cause wrong effects into accounts,Now we have to lock such transaction, Pl. suggest.
Regards,
Devendra

Before proceeding to block anything, first understand the reason as to why it was posted. There will be many cases where you will require to post uplanned GI, so in such cases the blocking will limit genuine needs.
However if you've factored in all such cases & believe that no amount of user training will help, then do a check via an enhancement such as WORKORDER_GOODSMVT, where you can do your custom checks & prevent posting based on the criteria you specify.

Similar Messages

Lock the first row in an ordered table

Hi,
I have a table (TD_EVENTOS). I want to lock the row with te minimun value of a column (a timestamp called hora_evento) and some requirements of other columns. Then i build a cursor like this:
CURSOR c is select * from td_eventos where (...) order by hora_evento for update skip locked;
And then I make a fetch into this cursor and I get the row (locked) that I want. But i need the speedest way, and making that cursor it orders all rown in the table (when I only want the first row without lock) and when that table has 6000 or 7000 rows it wastes around 130 ms. My solution is to add to the WHERE a AND rownum < 50, and it only orders 50 rows (in 10 ms), but it orders 50 aleatory rows, and that`s not what I want.
Any solution faster?
Thanks!

Sorry that wasn't clear of me and could be misleading. I didn't mean Oracle would have to do a full table scan, another access path such as an appropriate index scan would do. I was trying to get across that to do any kind of order or min or max, all records have to be investigated. Since the fact that you don't know a row is locked until you try to lock it, you clearly can't filter on it (it's not a data attribute).
Apologies for any confusion my earlier post might have caused.
The suggestion about using a sorted hash cluster still stands though, they are designed for FIFO queues.
Which reminds me - SKIP LOCKED is in fact undocumented but everybody knows that Oracle use it internally for doing AQ. Since it's undocumented, you don't know how it works, when it will work, when it won't and of course Oracle can turn around and say "we don't support this".

How can I lock the order of photos in my IPhoto albums?

I have created albums in IPhoto and have arranged the photos in the order I want them. But when I open IPhoto and click on an album, I often find that some of the photos have moved to different locations. This is maddening to me! Is there a way to lock the position of photos in the albums?

Thanks, I will send in some feedback. It seems silly to have a menu option to arrange photos "Manually," then have them move around seemingly on their own.

HT201441 I bought an iphone 4*at*t from a craigslist ad. The seller did not restore the phone and when I tried to do it manually it locked the phone and is now asking for the login info. I contacted the seller and he is not responding. What do i do?

The seller did not restore the phone and when I tried to do it manually it locked the phone and is now asking for the login info in order to do anything with the phone. I contacted the seller and he is not responding. What do i do?

he knows his ID , if he did all whats in the link he can get his password back ?
how can i make him call applecare ? is there a way to speak to them from jordan ??
i have been trying to reach any1 in apple so they can communicate and help my friend (us) to make him remember it .
am not asking for the password or trying to get into the phone without using it , and i can take my money back though i need to help my friend as well since now he cant use it as well.
thanks kil

I am using the Order Analysis Toolkit and want to get more information about the compensation for "Reference Signal Processing", which is scarce in the manuals, the website and the examples installed with the toolkit.

I am using the Order Analysis Toolkit and want to get more information about the compensation for "Reference Signal Processing", which is scarce in the manuals, the website and the examples installed with the toolkit.
In particular, I am analyzing the example "Even Angle Reference Signal Processing (Digital Tacho, DAQmx).vi", whose documentation I am reproducing in the following:
DESCRIPTIONS:
This VI demonstrates how to extract even angle reference signals and remove the slow-roll errors. It uses DAQmx VIs to acquire sound or vibration signals and a digital tachometer signal. This VI includes a two-step process: acquire data at low rotational speed to extract even angle reference; use the even angle reference to remove the errors in the vibration signal acquired at normal operation.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Run the VI.
2. On the DAQ Configurations tab, specify the sample rate, samples per channel, device and channel configurations, and tachometer channel information.
NOTE: You need to use DSA PXI-447x/PXI-446x and PXI TIO device in a PXI chassis to run this example. The DSA device must be in slot 2 of the PXI chassis.
3. Switch to Extract Even Angle Reference tab. Specify the number of samples to acquire and the # of revs in reference which determines the number of samples in even angle reference. Click Start to take a one-shot data acquisition of the vibration and tachometer signals. After the acquisition, you can see the extracted even angle references in Even Angle Reference.
4. Switch to the Remove Slow-roll Errors tab. Click Start to acquire data continuously and view the compensate results. Click Stop in this tab to stop the acquisition.
ORDER ANALYSIS VIs USED IN THIS EXAMPLE:
1. SVL Scale Voltage to EU.vi
2. OAT Digital Tacho Process.vi
3. OAT Get Even Angle Reference.vi
4. OAT Convert to Even Angle Signal.vi
5. OAT Compensate Even Angle Signal.vi
My question is: How is the synchronization produced at the time of the compensation ? How is it possible to eliminate the errors in a synchronized fashion with respect to the surface of the shaft bearing in mind that I am acquired data at a low rotation speed in order to get the "even angle reference" and then I use it to remove the errors in the vibration signal acquired at normal operation. In this application both operations are made in different acquisitions, therefore the reference of the correction signal is lost. Is it simply compensated without synchronizing ?
Our application is based on FPGA and we need to clarity those aspects before implementing the procedure.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi CracKatoA.
Take a look at the link bellow:
http://forums.ni.com/ni/board/message?board.id=170&message.id=255126&requireLogin=False
Regards,
Filipe Silva

HT1212 So my phone is messed up and you can't do anything with the screen...in order for me to sink it to back up i have to enter the passcode because it had a lock on it...and i can't due to it being messed up...is there any way around this...

So my phone is messed up and you can't do anything with the screen...in order for me to sink it to back up i have to enter the passcode because it had a lock on it...and i can't due to it being messed up...is there any way around this...

See Here > http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1808
You may need to try this More than Once... Be sure to Follow ALL the Steps...
Take your time... Pay particular attention to Steps 3 and 4.
Make sure you have the Current Version of iTunes Installed on your computer
iTunes free download from www.itunes.com/download
After you have Recovered your Device...
Re-Sync your Content or Restore from the most recent Backup...
Restore from Backup > http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1766

PM: how to track the operations in prev.maint order against object list

Dear PM Guru's.
i have one issue in my preventive maintenance scenario. i clubed the same type of machines in one maintenance order under object list tab. and i mention the list operations in maintenance order. suppose in one preventive maintenance order 10 operations are maintained and 5objects are mentioned in that order. Now i like to mention all these 10 operations activities against to 5 objects. how i can assign sequentially? i required like 10operations one by one row wise and 5objects side by side column wise. i would like to update the each operation activity against each machine column? how i have to do this one?
Please suggest me and help me.
regards
Jalendhar Merugu

Using Object functionality, we can maintain many equipments in the order.
But the constraint is that one operation can be assigned to only one equipment. In your case, you have 5 objects. If all 10 operations will be performed on 5 objects, then you have to maintain 50 operations & you should assign the objects.
In other words, if one operation will be performed on 5 objects, then you should define that one operation 5 times & you have to assign to technical objects. You can't share one operation to many equipments.

After creating a playlist, it becomes locked or frozen and I cannot move the songs around in different order.

After creating a playlist, it becomes locked or frozeen and I cannot move the songs around in different order.

Select the very first column header (above the numbers) and then try it.

IPhoto album slideshow will not play in the manually sorted order.

iPhoto Album slideshow will not play in the manually sorted order.

Use a regular slideshow created by "File > New Slideshow". These will play manually sorted. The instant slideshows cannot be played in a manual sort order.

Lock the production order creating without material for order type zp01

Hi all,
Good morning.My client wants to lock the production order creating without material for order type zp01.He does not want to create production order without material.Its very urgent.Please guide me the settings if any.
Thanks and Regards
Sukumar

Hi Sukumar,
You can do by applying user exit.
Use PPCO0007 - Exit when saving production order.
Function module - EXIT_SAPLCOZV_001.
Include Program - ZXCO1U06
Write your Code:
*& Include ZXCO1U06
Regards,
Sankaran

Program RCCLTRAN is locking the changes of the Production Orders

Hello,
I am encountering an issue, the standard program RCCLTRAN which read production order and create idocs are locking the changes made in APO. The message specifies: "Changes to Order 1XXXX are not transferred".
May I know if there is a User Exit that could be implemented that will not affect the planning activities of the planners when the program is running simultaneously?
Thanks for your support!
Nap

Hi Nap,
I am not familiar with the program that you mentioned.
However I think it should still be possible to give some guidance if you can share the following information:
1) Using RCCLTRAN, where do you send the Idocs to?
2) The error that you mentioned - Is it appearing in APO or is it appearing in R/3 when this program RCCLTRAN is running in R/3, and some planners are sending planned orders from APO?
PS: In standard SAP, it's not possible that 2 users make changes simultaneously to the same document, and this is not advisable also. So I hope you are not requesting for this.
Regards - Pawan

Since upgrading to Lion OS, the wifi connectivity keeps blocking up intermittently and we need to manually keep switching on and off the wifi utility to get the connection back. even locking the preferred wifi network in system preferences does not help.

Since upgrading to Lion OS 10.7.1, the wifi connectivity keeps blocking up intermittently and we need to manually keep switching on and off the wifi utility to get the connection back. even locking the preferred wifi network in system preferences does not help. This never used to happen with Snow Leopard

This is a big thank you to Rys Sinnefeldt who posted this fix.
Rys has made this fix very easy to do and takes literally 2 mins. It involves replacing the Atheros Lion driver 4.0 and replacing it with the snow leopard driver. Don't worry, Rys has made this so simple to do even I could do it and so far I have had no more wifi drops.
follow this link
http://rys.pixeltards.com/2011/09/04/osx-lion-wifi.html
Thanks again to Rys.

Bridge does not keep the manual sort order

I've tried everything I know but I cannot get Bridge to keep the manual sort order (iMac, 10.6, CS4). What is the file responsible for keeping the sort order? Perhaps removing it would help. This is really frustrating. It would be so important to keep related pictures together for estimating all the aspects.

This is action script 3.0 Flash CS3
Below is what I receive back after I test it but it is not in
order. I guess I assumed that if the tab order is correct and the
are layout in that order and the code in the form is in order it
would come back the same way. Mostly I am trying to narrow down the
problem and my guess is the cgi script or am I wrong? I have
attached the code for the form.
Thank You for you time
Form email submission results:
Below is what you submitted on Tuesday, February 19, 2008 at
10:35:08
list:
phone:
address:
comments:
city:
state:
zip:
name:

Production orders are done with GR 101 moment type without material consumption(261)

Hello Experts,
We have some of production orders where the goods receipt is done with 101 moment type on confirmations without consuming the components i.e not 261 moment type not happened.
We have checked the backflush for the components and also the stock and every thing is fine.
But we have observed the Resevations for corrsponding Production orders the "moment allowed" is not checked and hence the 261 moment is not happened, But not sure why it is not active.
Could any one let me know why this RESB-XWAOK is not checked in the reservations and aslo on what are the possible conditions this happens.
Please help...Thanks in advance
Regards
Madan

check directly in MB1C transaction with the reference of order movement type 261 material would be consume.
also check batch enter field in MRP 2 view control this make it blank and then system will not determine batches in production order and you can select batches in MB1A/B/C transaction.
Regards,
Sanjeev

I have a problem with my new Apple Air. It usually takes few seconds for the laptop to be untouched in order to be locked. So sometimes when the screen starts to get dim in order to lock, I immediately touch the keypad to avoid locking the laptop

I have a problem with my new Apple Air. It usually takes few seconds for the laptop to be untouched in order to be locked. So, sometimes when the screen starts to get dim in order to lock, I immediately touch the keypad to avoid locking the laptop, the result is a black screen appears with no responding to anything from pressing the keyboard to pressing the touchpad. It takes few minutes for the laptop to open again and then a message appears saying that there was a problem with the lock security.
What is happening exactly?

It sounds like your sleep timers are set to too low of a value. Go to System Preferences -> Energy Saver and set both timers to longer times. The computer sleep timer should be a longer time than the display sleep timer.

Lock the manual consumption 261 against order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for