Lockbox Issue with payment on exact day as Cash Discount Days 1 Due Date

Dear Gurus
We are running into an issue in as much as when we receive a payment against our Lockbox on the exact day as the Cash Discount Days 1 due date the system posts this as an on account posting as opposed to applying the cash against the open receivable and posting the difference to the Cash Discount Account.
E.g. Invoice 10000 Payment term 34 days 2% Net 35. I created the AR invoice today with invoice date and posting date of Oct 9, 2009 and posted the same. Received payment $ 9800 on Lockbox file today Nov 12 using the BAI2 format Lockbox file and found that the system did not even show the invoice # on the Lockbox reports but it recognized the customer based on the MICR # and posted an on account payment. It gave the error" F5 263 Difference too large for Clearing"
The users have prior complained that this situation arises in F-28 as well where they would have to force the discount instead of the system recognizing the same if cash was being applied on the same date as the Cash discount Days 1 due date.
Any help in this regards will be geratly appreciated and points awarded.
Regards
Satpal Narang

Hi Satpal,
Please check the net due date of the document which you are trying to do the payment. As it is critical information to calculate the cash discount.
I hope this helps.
Regards
Ravinagh Boni

Similar Messages

  • Issues with payment run

    Hi All,
    I am facing with a issue with payment run FPY1. Some of the customers are refunded the amount which is not supposed to be refunded to them. When i check the Contract account level and document level, at both level there is no outgoing payment method set. Is there any other way by which payment run would pick up the amount and refund it back to custmer.
    Kindly share your thoughts.
    Regards,
    Rahul

    Do you have a third level of master data?  In certain FI-CA systems there is a lower level of master data (i.e. contract, insurance object).  A payment method can also be set at this level.

  • Dunning issue with payment block

    Hi Experts,
    I am currently having an issue with Dunning process.
    -> In SAP standard behaviour, if we have a document which has a payment block associated to it,will it be dunned ?
    My issue is that whenever I have a document which has a payment block associated to it, it is being dunned and I dont want this.
    Could you please advise me on how to proceed ?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi SDNer,
    Thanks for the confirmation.
    But the thing is that I can not put a Dunning Block to it.
    The requirement is that when there is a payment block associated to a document, it should not be dunned.
    Is there any configuration that needs to be done or any Enhancement ?
    Thanks.

  • Lockbox issue with overpayment

    Hi,
       We have a small situation going on in our company and any help on this would be deeply appreciated.
    We are using partial payment payments for AR and intend to use that. When we process the lockbox file, depending on the amount 3 things happen:
    1. If the payment amount is equal to the invoice, it clears the invoice.
    2. If the payment is less then the invoice it applies the invoices partially.
    There two pieces are working good.
    The problem is when the payment is greater than the invoice amount. In this case it applies the payment to the invoice even though it is greater than the invoice and both the payment and the invoice are sitting in the open items. How do I make it not apply to the invoice in case of overpayments. Or even if it applies is there a way to create a document of the balance only in this case.
    Thanks,
    Kunal

    Hi Satpal,
    Please check the net due date of the document which you are trying to do the payment. As it is critical information to calculate the cash discount.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Bios issues with k8n neo2, turn of memory test, and dmi pool data

    Hey guys.
    I recently flashed my bios to the 1.9's for the K8n neo2 running in my main machine.
    Everything went ok for the most part, though i had some issues with boot record, and boot.cfg file.  That stuff is all worked out now.
    However, with this bios, I constantly get the extended memory test, on my 2 gigs of ram.  The old bios i had, 1.4's, didnt do that.  Is there an option to turn that off?  I cant seem to find it any where?
    My 2nd question is this, after this bios upgrade, my verifying dmi pool data takes longer then it used to, if it even did it before, im not sure, because my boot sequence was much faster.
    How can I get rid of the "verifying dmi pool data" or speed it up?
    Thanks guys

    Tried to used the Bios 1c by Syar's. His bios is nice and easy. Maybe bould solve your problem.BTW do used liveupdate to flashed your Bios or is it manual? Stay away from using liveupdate as it causing a lot problems. Manual is the best way. Refer to my sig for the manual flashing. Here's the location of the files for the Bios 1C. Gd luck.
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=59711.0
    P/S: Create your own rig with details including the PSU and Bios revision and put in your signatures so others can help you.

  • Year of Cash Effectivity and Due Date for payments in following year

    Hi experts!
    I have a problem with Year of Cash Effectivity when dealing with invoices which have Due Date in a different year from the posting date. I just need revenues and expenses to be recognized under the accrual basis of accounting (with the invoice, not with "cash effectivity" depending on terms of payment). But we do need "cash effectivity" for commitments budget and MM.
    I am using Update Profile=000359, and have tried to "Override Update Profile" for Value Type=54 (Invoices) checking "Posting Date" for Payment/Commitment Budget, instead of "Due Date". I have also deactivated settings that have to do with payments transfer in <<Public Sector Management->Funds Management Government->Actual and Commitment Update/Integration->Integration>>.
    Is there any way to change this without changing Update Profile?
    Thanks for your help!
    Iván Garcí

    Hello Ivan
    I believe this note will help you:
    [Note 883122 - Spanish Public Sector: Specific functions (BAdIs and exits)|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/883122]
    see this paragraph
      BAdI FMRI
      The method FMRI_BADI_9 allows the customer to change, according
      to their needs, the Year of Cash Effectivity in which FI
      documents are updated in Funds Management.
      The system performs some checks (for example the update profile
      has to use the Year of Cash Effectivity) to permit the
      modification of the Year of Cash Effectivity in this BADI. The
      Year of Cash Effectivity determined in this BAdI cannot be
      earlier than the one for the date when the Financial Accounting
      payments are updated in Funds Management.For more detailed
      information on this topic, consult the note 1129408.
    hope this will help you!
    Kind regards
    Mar

  • Issue with Payment Accounting in a 'Cash with Encumbrance' setting.

    Hi Everybody,
    We are upgrading from 11i v 11.5.10.2 to Oracle R12 v 12.1.3 . We have setup Cash with Encumbrance as the subledger accounting ledger in our primary
    ledger. The AAD for payables which is the seeded one is also valid, however to our surprise and dissapointment Create Accounting program does not account any new or old payments alike after upgrade. Any one who has encountered similar problem pls. help. Error message in Create Accouting report output is Error Number 0, Error Message : The subledger journal entry does not balance in the entered currency.  Please verify the entered amounts on the journal entry lines. (This error appears because the system does not create a Cash Clearing Line,hence the JE is unbalanced; which is wrong.)
    It seams the system is behaving like Accrual, checking first if the Invoice for the payment has been accounted or not, which in our case is erroneous because we have setup Cash Basis alongwith encumbrance. please advise.
    Many thanks,
    Arv

    Please see if these docs help.
    R12 "The Subledger Journal Entry Does Not Balance In The Entered Currency" Error While Create Accounting [ID 743441.1]
    Enhancement Request- Purchasing - Accounting [ID 1281525.1]
    Issues Related To R12 Create Accounting Process - List Of Code Fixes [ID 1179643.1]
    R12 - Troubleshooting Accounting Errors [ID 1112504.1]
    R12 Multi-Fund Account Receivables Accrual: Negative Misc Receipts and Receipt Reversal Fail During Accounting: The subledger journal entry does not balance in the entered currency. [ID 762218.1]
    Awt Wrongly Accounted On Cash Basis Accounting [ID 1294376.1]
    Thanks,
    Hussein

  • Issue with payment of terms

    Hi ,
    I am using Basic type ORDERS05 , Message Type ORDERS and for processing FM IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.
    I expect the sales orders to give the same data when the IDOC's are the same and the customer master data is the same, but we have a concern with some orders coming in via EDI for customer sold-to-party is 10000000. When we check for IDOC's 200 (sales order 600 is been created) and for idoc 205 (sales order 650 is been created). Comparing the IDOC's and the sales orders and customer ship-to's, I see no differences except that for the sales order 600, the terms of payment do not show up from the sold-to master, but in order 650, they do.
    Please help me.
    Thanks.

    In debugging found that the PIN code of the customer is different from the IDoc to the SAP ones. So we are getting this issue.

  • Issue With Payment Proposal.

    Hello Experts,
    When I am running proposal,I am facing the message " Payment Proposal Could not be carried Out".
    Could you please guide me what it means?
    Thanks,
    Bala

    In order to debug this problem follow these steps:
    1 Key note - If you have other payment runs that you have executed with the same vendors that have not been carried to completion, they must be finished or deleted. you cannot have multiple payment runs in process with the same vendor.
    1. in F110 - Click Edit > Proposal > Delete - The parameters will now be open for you to edit them
    2. On the "Additional Log" tab, make sure you have selected the checkbox " Payment method selection in all cases"
    3. Also on the additional log tab, make sure to enter the range of your vendors you wish to make payments to in the "Accounts Required" field
    4. Now Save the proposal and execute again.
    5. Once it is done running click on the "display proposal log" button. This will give you an explanation of any errors that you may run into.
    If you still cannot figure out the issue let me know
    David

  • Issue with Payment File Creation: F110

    Hi, Everyone.
    Can anyone help me regarding this issue: Payment with identification MR319 with the run date 15.11.2011 does not contain bank account and BIC in the header of the payment file?
    Please advise.
    Thank you in advance for the help.

    Hi, Everyone.
    Another update regarding this issue, in the transaction code F110, we added another program: ZSTR001S at the Printout/data medium.  But whenever we run the payment, there's no payment file being created.  How can I resolve this issue?
    Actually, the solution in order to have bank headers in the file is to add the program ZSTR001S.  Whenever we use the payment method: V, E and S, this program should be visible at the last tab.  But upon adding this at the Printout/data medium (I did this by changing the payment medium of V and S from TRAX_DOMEST to ZSTR001S).  So it became visible at the last tab, but it didn't create any payment file.  What do you think is the reason behind this?
    Thank you.

  • Issue with Payment Run (FPY1)

    Hi Gurus, need you help. I am getting the following message when executing the FPY1. Exceptions        1 Message no. MASSACT101 Diagnosis Counter Exceptions has value        1. For a more precise description of counter Click Here. Counter in Payment Program: Items with Exception Indicator Definition Number of items that cannot be paid and that have been placed in the list of payment exceptions. Each payment exception is classified using the item indicator (data element POKEN_PAY). For each item indicator, you can define whether these exceptions are to be included in the clarification worklist of the payment run.

    Hi Aravind
    Payments which cannot be made through FPY1 are caught in the exceptions. You can view the exception list by checking on the excpetion checkbox. Each exception corresponds to an item indicator (POKEN_PAY). Check for what item indicator, you are getting an exception. The solution is based on the type of exception.
    check the screenshot below
    regards
    debashish

  • HT202023 anyone have an issue with Evernote premium purchase taking more than a day to take effect?

    upgraded to Evernote Premium on iTunes but roughly after a day, Evernote still indicates that it is the free version....any ideas?

    I have the same problem, I went to the payment process, selected the program, filled my personal data(credit card, billing address, etc) and after I clicked continue  and I got redirected to a webpage that said "Thank You Once your payment has been processed, you will receive an email from Apple Developer Program Support on how to activate and access your items. It may take up to two (2) business days to process your order." But I have not received any email notification from Apple nor my credit card been charged the $99 and my enrollment status is pending and telling me to go through the purchase process once again.
    I filled the form 3 days ago (friday). I dont have a clue where I am standing... Any help please.
    Also I sent an email to the support team explaining my concerns and it's been more than 24 hours and no message received.

  • Issue with payment terms

    Hi all,
    This is an urgent requirement. We need to change the payment terms from 21 NET to 28 NET for two purchase orders at the purchase order level.
    How can this be achieved ?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    We have the tab called Terms beside the shipment tab, in this we can change the payment terms as you like.
    Regards,
    Raju.

  • Issue with payment run

    hi guru's
    We have one vendor in two company code one is India and one is USA. The bank account number  is different in vendor master data but both accounts in the same country.
    When we make the payment run it has to split to different account based on the currency say for example in this case INR and USD.
    What we are doing at the moment  is whenever we want to make payment to say for example bank account 123456789 we will delete one bank in master data that is 987654321  and make payment. Whenever we want to make payment to 987654321 we will delete 123456789 bank in the master data and make payment.
    Is there any alternative way to split payment according to two bank or 3 banks based on the vendor master data?
    Thanks
    Sunitha

    I don't know a way to split, but to make separate payments you do not need to change the vendor master all the time.  In the vendor master, assign a unique value in the field BnkT for each bank account that you have in the vendor master; this 4-character value is free text (you can enter anything you want as long as you can distinguish).  You then enter this key while entering vendor invoice in SAP (either via FB60 or MIRO).  You will see the field as "Part. Bank" in Payment tab of FB60/MIRO.  The payment program then pays the item via that bank in the vendor master to which this key is assigned.

  • Issue with MIR7(BADI or User exit needed for stop SO data updating)

    Hi,
    While using MIR7 to post invoice, corresponding sales order item data is changed ,such as 'Billing date'.
    We don't want this happen. Please let me know if there is any BADI or Uer exit for achieving this. Thanks in advance..
    Regards..

    Hi,
    These are all BADI/Exit of MIR7 transactions.
    MRM_TRANSACT_DEFAULT
    MRM_HEADER_DEFAULT
    WRF_PREPAY_INVOICE
    MRM_ITEM_CUSTFIELDS
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS01
    BADI_LAYER
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS02
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS03
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS04
    BADI_FDCB_SUBBAS05
    PPA_CUST_BADI
    FI_TRANS_DATE_DERIVE
    Thanks ,
    Abhijit

Maybe you are looking for

  • Websites are not working from my history

    I just upgraded to FF 31. Now when I choose a website from my history, instead of being taken to the website, I am taken to google search results. This is really frustrating. I saw an article about changing the search info in the config file, and I c

  • Report Tree for PS

    Hi Guys, Is there a transaction code for Report tree in PS. Like we have for AP - F.98, assets ART0 Thanks, Satya

  • Aperture 3.03 when quitting gets stuck in "Updating information for preview

    Hi there, i notice that maybe 3 out of 10 times when i quit aperture, it hangs. There is a progress bar at the top saying "updating information for preview images" (translated, so the english original may be a bit different) but the bar wont move, th

  • IPhoto 5 problem

    Had problem with disk burning this am, and now getting message that "The photo library was created with an unrreleased version of iPhoto. Tells me to please quit and upgrade this library by openiing it in iPhoto 2 or iPhoto 4. I have iLife 05 loaded

  • How to increase image size?

    I am trying to put a collection of images onto a photo library and I need the image to be higher than 24mb. how do I increase the size of my images?