LockBox

Hello Experts,
I need to know the bank account # where the customer payments are going to. The payment method is blank in the customer master data - however the lockbox field is populated ( table : KNB1).
How do we find out the bank account # from the Lock Box #.
All answers would be duly rewarded with points.
Thanks,
Nandita

Efren
I don't have any lockbox file with me - I just need to know what account the payment would go to if the customer makes a payment.
Thanks,
Nandita

Similar Messages

  • Oracle EDI - Bank Statement Interface, Payment file to Bank and AR Auto Lockbox

    Hello,
    There is a need from the client to do setups for EDI - this is needed for Bank Statement Import from the Bank, sending Bank Payment file and also getting the Lockbox details. How is this done? What are the steps? What are the setup steps? Thanks,
    Arun

    Hello,
    There is a need from the client to do setups for EDI - this is needed for Bank Statement Import from the Bank, sending Bank Payment file and also getting the Lockbox details. How is this done? What are the steps? What are the setup steps? Thanks,
    Arun

  • Clearing of customer open items in FLB2 (Lockbox)

    Hi Gurus,
    What is the correct process of lockbox in case when we recieve partial payment or out of 10 invoices one is partially paid. What will system do.
    Thanks

    Hi
    Just run FEBP as a nightjob after the Finsta have been imported, and create one variant per company code. I works perfect for us.
    If you provide me with you email, I can send you a dump screen of our variants.
    Best regards
    Pernille

  • Issue with printing lockbox report

    Hi,
    My lockbox report after processing file is giving the total amount and check amount correctly but when I print the same report, the figures don't match with the correct report figures for check amount and advice total.
    Please help....
    Thanks,
    Sheel
    Edited by: Sheel Ahuja on May 19, 2010 11:11 PM

    Hello,
    Please, open a message for SAP on the OSS Marketplace. There are some notes for this type of issue, but they are currently in pilot release.
    So, open a message describing the issue and providing a reproducible example in your system.
    REgards,
    REnan

  • One lockbox for multiple company codes

    Is it possible to have one lockbox for multiple company codes?

    No, I don't think so. Lockbox is 1:1 for a Company Code.
    You configure Lockbox for a Company Code.
    You can use one of the 2 available Lockbox user exits (not sure which) to write a piece of code that searches invoices against the customer posted to different company codes. You will have to have the intercompany setups.
    You may find an OSS notes for intercompany clearing.
    Hope this helps!

  • One lockbox for multiple company code

    Hi Guru's.
    Currently we have one company code to many lockbox configured, process
    is working fine.
    We are in process of merging two companies.
    We have a scenario were we have one Lockbox shared between multiple
    company code, when we process the lockbox file lockbox process will
    clear one company code Invoice and other Invoice for different company
    code are unprocessed.
    We have looked in to user exit EXIT_RFEBLB20_001 and EXIT_RFEBLB20_002,
    was not much of help.
    Regards,
    KJ

    I had this scenario few years back in a company and we used exit RFEBLB20_002. We used logic to find the invoicing company code from the BSID table using the document number from lockbox file, then change the default lockbox company code to invoicing company code. Unfortunately this scenario will work only if you use unique document number ranges for each company codes which is not the case for most companies.
    Edited by: PaulKr on Sep 26, 2011 9:08 PM

  • Has FB15 transaction implementation caused side effects to Lockbox

    We have recently implemented the new transaction FB15 for assigning of open items in customer account clearing.
    Since implementation we are having issues in post processing of Lockbox . In the past we have been able to go back to previous month applied on account items from the lockbox application (Transaction Feba_Lockbox) and apply them to the proper invoices by changing the posting date to current month. Now we are not able to get to the screen that allows us to change the posting date and we get a hard error that says posting period is closed

    > Does anyone know exactly what the problem is (what has Microsoft changed) ?
    a) Go to <http://www.ciac.org/ciac/bulletins/p-006.shtml> and search for the "CAN-" links. Each component has a one paragraph description.
    b) According to <http://patch-info.de/IE/2004/10/12/20-35-16.html> it contains:
    mshtml.dll (6,0,2800,1476 - 29,09,2004)
    urlmon.dll (6,0,2800,1474 - 23,09,2004)
    shdocvw.dll (6,0,2800,1584 - 27,08,2004)
    wininet.dll (6,0,2800,1468 - 23,08,2004)
    browseui.dll (6,0,2800,1584 - 22,08,2004)
    shlwapi.dll (6,0,2800,1584 - 20,08,2004)
    c) Some of the things that could be breaking are DOM references and DHTML, which are advanced features that not every application uses.
    From <http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS04-038.mspx>:
    "Caveats: Microsoft Knowledge Base Article 834707 <http://support.microsoft.com/?id=834707> documents the currently known issues that customers may experience when they install this security update. The article also documents recommended solutions for these issues."
    Among other issues, that page says [<b>emphasis</b> added]:
    - After you install the MS04-038 security updates for Internet Explorer, some dynamic HTML (DHTML) <b>drag-and-drop operations are blocked</b> by Internet Explorer.
    - Security update 834707 includes a change to the way that Internet Explorer handles function pointers. This change in functionality occurs when an event handler points directly to a Document Object Model (DOM) function [...] Change in Internet Explorer function pointer behavior <b>causes code to not be executed</b> when an event handler is set to directly reference a DOM function after installing MS04-038 security updates.
    BTW, Note 785308 has been updated with a workaround.
    Regards,
    Sean

  • Using Lockbox want to hit different GL account for each payment

    Hi Everyone,
    Currently, we have lockbox up and running for credit card payments from third party system and hitting cash account in Oracle.
    I want to implement one more payment mode for e.g. ACH, which will hit differed revenue account in Oracle.
    1. Now, as the current lockbox is hitting cash, I didn't left with any other option but I ended up setting up new lockbox with deffered revenue account attached to it. Here correct me if I am wrong with my understanding. Can one lockbox hit different GL account for different payment mode like Cash account for Credit Card and Differed Revenue account for ACH?
    2. With my assumption from point 1 that I have to create new one for different GL account, I created new lockbox and added lockbox number in transmission format, control file and in data file. After that launched lockbox program for each lockbox number with understanding that each lockbox program will pick up its own payment records based on lockbox nubmer in datafile and process it. But what happened is that first lockbox program processed its own record and also another lockbox number records and finally, its processed its own way of hitting cash account. So again payments hit cash accounts, where my expectation was that each lockbox will pick up its own lockbox number record and hit it to respective GL account i.e. cash and deffered revenue.
    Why one lockbox processed another lockbox number records also from same file?
    How to achieve this? I dont want to make two seperate data file for each lockbox number, but want to process from one single data file.
    Please update me ASAP as I need to freeze the requirement at the earliest.

    I suggest you to create a Dummy Materials. Lets say,
    material number: 1001
    enter material description as Domestic
    material number: 1002
    enter material description as Imports
    and in OBYC for GBB
    make the following settings:
    val grp      gen mod    val cla      gl a/c dr     gl a/c cr
    0001     VBR     4000     74180040     74180040
    0001     VBR     4001     78020091     78020091
    so that when u create PO u can get default GL (consumption GL )  for the material (u can use the same for material group also) and u can maintain WRX acc determination as follows ..
    val grp   val cla    gl a/c dr   gl a/c cr
    0001      4000     123456     123456
    0001      4001     456789     456789
    Thus u need to create 2 different valuation class for these material group specific and in PO while entering the text u can add the text which is displayed along with material description
    hope this helps

  • Error occurred in Lockbox Processing.....

    Hello All,
    While running Lockbox import program in Receivables: Interfaces > Lockbox Its ending with Error.
    I herewith submitting the Source file, Data File and Error Logout put file.
    Please look into error and guide me to clear this error.
    Source File:
    -- Type 2 - Lockbox Header
    INTO TABLE AR_PAYMENTS_INTERFACE
    WHEN RECORD_TYPE = '2'
    ( STATUS CONSTANT 'AR_PLB_NEW_RECORD'
    ,RECORD_TYPE POSITION(01:01) CHAR
    ,DESTINATION_ACCOUNT POSITION(02:11) CHAR
    ,ORIGINATION POSITION(12:21) CHAR
    ,LOCKBOX_NUMBER POSITION(22:27) CHAR
    -- Type 6 - Payment record
    INTO TABLE AR_PAYMENTS_INTERFACE
    WHEN RECORD_TYPE = '6'
    ( STATUS CONSTANT 'AR_PLB_NEW_RECORD'
    ,RECORD_TYPE POSITION(01:01) CHAR
    ,LOCKBOX_NUMBER POSITION(02:05) CHAR
    ,BATCH_NAME POSITION(06:08) CHAR
    ,ITEM_NUMBER POSITION(09:11) CHAR
    ,REMITTANCE_AMOUNT POSITION(12:21) DECIMAL external
    ,TRANSIT_ROUTING_NUMBER POSITION(22:30) CHAR
    ,ACCOUNT POSITION(31:44) CHAR
    ,CHECK_NUMBER POSITION(45:54) CHAR
    ,DEPOSIT_DATE POSITION(55:60) DATE 'YYMMDD' NULLIF DEPOSIT_DATE=BLANKS
    -- Type 4 - Overflow
    INTO TABLE AR_PAYMENTS_INTERFACE
    WHEN RECORD_TYPE = '4'
    ( STATUS CONSTANT 'AR_PLB_NEW_RECORD'
    ,RECORD_TYPE POSITION(01:01) CHAR
    ,LOCKBOX_NUMBER POSITION(02:05) CHAR
    ,BATCH_NAME POSITION(06:08) CHAR
    ,ITEM_NUMBER POSITION(09:11) CHAR
    ,OVERFLOW_SEQUENCE POSITION(12:14) CHAR
    ,OVERFLOW_INDICATOR POSITION(15:15) CHAR
    ,INVOICE1 POSITION(16:30) CHAR
    ,CUSTOMER_NUMBER POSITION(34:41) CHAR
    ,AMOUNT_APPLIED1 POSITION(42:51) DECIMAL external
    "DECODE(:AMOUNT_APPLIED1,0,NULL,:AMOUNT_APPLIED1)"
    Data File:
    2GOVT_MGBSS10123456789L820
    6LB01MGB0010001723187 L150 110401
    4LB01MGB100100109100701 00300001023134857
    4LB01MGB100100209100702 00300001023179809
    4LB01MGB100100309100703 00300001023179809
    4LB01MGB100100409100704 00300001023179809
    4LB01MGB100100509100705 00300001023149841
    4LB01MGB100100609100706 00300001023179809
    4LB01MGB100100709100707 00300001023179809
    4LB01MGB100100809100708 00300001023179809
    4LB01MGB100100909100801 00300001023179809
    4LB01MGB100101009100802 00300001023179809
    Log output:
    ARLPLB module: Process Lockboxes
    Current system time is 24-APR-2012 11:40:51
    Starting ARLPLB
    Input parameters:
    Y
    Test15
    Y
    /muthulb/mgbmuthu/LB.txt
    arplbox
    1000
    Y
    N
    2011/05/01 00:00:00
    A
    N
    Y
    N
    120
    L
    Argv value for ignore invalid: |
    Argv value for report format: |A|
    Argv value for complete batches only: |N|
    Argv value for alt name search: |N|
    Argv value for ussgl trx code: |
    Argv value for org id: |120|
    Ignore Invalid Txn Num: |
    Scoring model Id is NULL
    Lockbox id is NULL.
    Inserted ar_transmissions record
    Control file: /d10/appltop/apps/apps_st/appl/ar/12.0.0/bin/arplbox.ctl
    Bad file: /d10/appltop/inst/apps/SOLDEV_mgbr12/logs/appl/conc/log/b539553.bad
    Log file: /d10/appltop/inst/apps/SOLDEV_mgbr12/logs/appl/conc/log/l539553.log
    Discard file: /d10/appltop/inst/apps/SOLDEV_mgbr12/logs/appl/conc/log/d539553.dis
    Username:SQL*Loader-350: Syntax error at line 3.
    Illegal combination of non-alphanumeric characters
    ^
    SQL*Loader: Release 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Tue Apr 24 11:40:51 2012
    Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    0
    AR-ARLPLB: fdpldr returned FALSE.
    AR-ARLPLB: Error in main.
    AR-ARLPLB: 0 ORA-01403: no data found
    Start of log messages from FND_FILE
    End of log messages from FND_FILE
    Executing request completion options...
    Finished executing request completion options.
    AR-ARLPLB: Error in main.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Muthu

    Hi;
    Please check below which could be helpful for your issue:
    AR-ARLPLB: 0 ORA-01403: no data foundTroubleshooting Known Issues In Lockbox [ID 1366298.1]
    Oracle Receivables Lockbox: Known Issues and Patches [ID 1358497.1]
    Receipts Workbench Error: Listing of ORA Errors [ID 1364345.1]
    Regard
    Helios

  • Lockbox User Exit Selection Fields and Matching Open Items in CustomerAccts

    Dear SAP Gurus,
                       I have an issue with lockbox process. The problem is selecting the customer open item for clearing. Our Client uses standard SAP USER EXIT (FEBLB001).
               Our billing document number does not equal to the financial accounting document number all the time. We store our billing document number in the Assignment field some times, and so this is the number the customer will reference when remitting payment. I have not been able to find a way to make the SAP system to use the customer's reference number (e.g. Assignment field) to clear the open item.
    I m not sure how to resolve this issue. As far as my knowledge, we have to add selection field ZUONR to USER EXIT apart from XBLNR, BELNR. Please help me with this problem by providing me some basic knowledge. I would greatly appreciate for help.
    Thanks

    Please Anybody,
    I m waiting for anybody to give their expertize.
    Thanks

  • Lockbox and clearing the Open Items

    Hi,
    I have a requirement and advise me will it be possible with standard SAP .
    Invoice 1 amt 500 USD
    Invoice 2 amt 600 USD
    Lockbox amt   1000
    Expectation :
    Lock Box program should clear both the invoices and create a the diff  of 100 ( 600+500 -1000) as residual amount.
    But I prefer to keep 100 with a diffrent Doc type .
    Is it possible?
    Alternatively I want to creeate the difference to another account like below
    Dr Lockbox      1000
    Dr Diff Clearing 100
    Cr  customer    600
    Cr Customer     500
    If the second option is required what should I do in User Exit . Looking for yr advice  please.
    Regards, Chitras

    Hi,
    If you are using BAI2 format of Lockbox file, it is possible to process partial payments. In the configuration you need to select the check box "Partial Payments". When this is selected a new line item is posted for the difference amount. This will be posted to Customer account as per the SAP standard.
    In case if you need to post to a cleaing account (GL Account), you need to analyze whether it is possible through an user exit.
    Thanks
    Murali.

  • Need SAP not to clear off the payment in LockBox processing

    HI,
    In the case of the lockbox processing, we want that the system doews not clear off the invoice in case there is payment difference.
    We want to take dicision on those payments manually.
    Regards,
    MCA

    Hi,
    You need to define the tolerances in OBA3 and OBXL.
    Then the system will not clear off the invoices, instead it will post the ament on account, which you need to then post process.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Payment Advcie - EDI 823 (Lockbox  - Incoming Payment)

    Hello,
    In process of testing EDI 823(Lockbox u2013 Incoming Payments) using testtool, Idocs are been successfully processing when an attempt is made to post the incoming customeru2019s payment for an open invoice (Basic type u2013 FINSTA01, Message type u2013 LOCKBX). Payment advice note is being generated for the successful processed Idocs.
    Then we ran a report RFAVIS40 in SE38 which basically selects the payments advices and then posts the clearing document. In the process when we are trying to execute the report for the generated payment advices u201CFor document type DZ, an entry is required in field referenceu201D this is the message we are getting.
    Manually I execute the same payment advice number using FBE2. When I enter the info in u2018Payment totalu2019 and u2018Payment doc.nou2019. at the Header level of FBE2 and then I run the report again, invoice documents are getting cleared.
    What config settings require to automate this functionality? OR Am I missing any mandatory field information at the time I process Idoc? OR System would work only in this manner?
    Please pass your comments.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Have never worked with EDI earlier so have some basic questions.
    We have an interface for incoming payments. The idea is that the incoming EDI IDOC interface would clear the open items in the customer account.
    Initially, have planned to use PEXR200/ REMADV, but realised that it is for creation of a payment advice. Can i use this to clear post and accounting doc or clear an open item in the customer account.
    Is there any other IDOC that i can use.
    thanks in advance

  • Lockbox / Payment advice and cash discount

    Hello
    I am using lockbox (EDI 823) to apply cash to customers. It happens that customers don't take cash discount or just take a partial cash discount. I have implemented exits in program RFBELB20 for other controls and invoice indentification.
    When the transaction processed, the payment should be applied to the invoice. However, when it is posted by SAP, cash discount is selected and payment is rejected because the overall payment difference is too big.
    In F-28, I can either deactivate the cash discount, or force the cash discount amount, either to zero or to a value less than the maximum cash discount allowed.
    In the table AVIP (payment advice detail), I have the fields WSKTO and XAKTS that, I supposed would allow me to do the same as in F-28. But it is not working. I may not fill AVIP with the correct data.
    How should I process this ? I can't imagine SAP does not allow this.
    Regards

    Any ideas ?

  • Lockbox Issue with payment on exact day as Cash Discount Days 1 Due Date

    Dear Gurus
    We are running into an issue in as much as when we receive a payment against our Lockbox on the exact day as the Cash Discount Days 1 due date the system posts this as an on account posting as opposed to applying the cash against the open receivable and posting the difference to the Cash Discount Account.
    E.g. Invoice 10000 Payment term 34 days 2% Net 35. I created the AR invoice today with invoice date and posting date of Oct 9, 2009 and posted the same. Received payment $ 9800 on Lockbox file today Nov 12 using the BAI2 format Lockbox file and found that the system did not even show the invoice # on the Lockbox reports but it recognized the customer based on the MICR # and posted an on account payment. It gave the error" F5 263 Difference too large for Clearing"
    The users have prior complained that this situation arises in F-28 as well where they would have to force the discount instead of the system recognizing the same if cash was being applied on the same date as the Cash discount Days 1 due date.
    Any help in this regards will be geratly appreciated and points awarded.
    Regards
    Satpal Narang

    Hi Satpal,
    Please check the net due date of the document which you are trying to do the payment. As it is critical information to calculate the cash discount.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Lockbox Issue

    Hello Experts,
    I have a question regarding the lockbox. We are using partial payment option in lockbox (OB10) and we have 0 tolerance at both customer and user level.
    The customer has an open invoice of $300 and that he pays $400 towards this invoice.
    When I tested this scenario,
    a) I got the check status as applied and
    b) The Invoice and the payment document are still open.
    Is this correct?
    My guessing for the check status applied is because of 0 tolerances, lockbox applied the cash to that invoice. If we had any tolerances then overpayment beyond the overpay tolerance amount is not allowed and that the amount sits on the account.
    Coming to the point b, because the customer is overpaying the invoice (not exact invoice amount) the invoice is still open. Am I correct?
    Please let me know as this is really important.
    Regards,
    Harish R

    this is correct, you will have to manually credit the customer account the $100 for the overpayment.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a way of Automating track volumes in finer increments of +/-0.1dB?

    Logic's 127-step resolution is far too crude for fine mixing adjustments - value 1 numerical adjustments sometimes mean jumps of +0.2 or even 0.3dB! Is there a way of increasing the resolution of Automation, at least for volume?

  • Expected Receipts Report

    Dear All, When we run this report by date range for example, from 01-Feb-2010 To 04- Feb-2010, the report has to fetch the order's promise date which fall between entered date ranges in the report parameter, but in the output it fetches up to 03- Feb

  • JAXB Implemetation

    Hi All, I have a few doubts related to the above mentioned topic. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Doubt 1 We are trying to use JAXB to implement Mapping Program in Java. I was wondering as to how and where should we put those files in the XI s

  • Satelite T130 cannot restart (reboot)

    I have Satelite T130-10G PST3AE bios v2.7 and it cannot restart. After restart the screen blanks the fan makes becames noisy for short time and that is all. To start it again it is necessary to switch it off and on. It starts normaly. Restarts were a

  • SOAP spec

    after reading soap specification at w3c i have a few questions 1) you can't use soap-envelope namespace with application specific <element>? since soap schema have not define namespace (env) can use with <MyElement> inside soap schema --> targetNames