Locking Issue in Planning DSO- SAP BW 7.3 Integarted Planning

Hi Experts,
We have built Aggregation Level on Direct Update (planning enabled) DSO and used the same in the input ready queries.( Its complete Manual planning - new row addition feature in WAD).
We have 5 characteristic and one key figure for planning.
We are facing lock issue while planning the data i.e. when one user is planning, other user cannot plan.
The lock relevant characteristic is Column A and the same has been added to the Lock Characteristic tab(RSPLSE) of the infoprovider. The input ready query is also restricted with a variable on Column A (manual input single variable- mandatory).
While the user opens the Planning Layout and plans the data, we can see lock entry in RSPLSE(locks tab) for the Column A selection in the infoprovider, yet if another user is trying to plan for data for some other selection of Column A, a lock entry in RSPLSE is shown with the selection but it errors in thelayout with lock on the infoprovider and cannot plan the data.
Any inputs will be of great help.
Regards,
Priyanka

Found the answer.
We had used the Planning Function directly in the WAD layout before saving data without filter.(basically to check some condition).
Created the Planning Sequence with Column A filter on the Aggregation level and used the same sequence before saving the data in WAD
Issue resolved.
Consider this post as closed.
Regards,
Priyanka

Similar Messages

Locking Issue in Planning DSO in SAP BW 7.3(Integrated Planning)

Hi Experts,
We have built Aggregation Level on Direct Update (planning enabled) DSO and used the same in the input ready queries.( Its complete Manual planning - new row addition feature in WAD).
We have 5 characteristic and one key figure for planning.
We are facing lock issue while planning the data i.e. when one user is planning, other user cannot plan.
The lock relevant characteristic is Column A and the same has been added to the Lock Characteristic tab(RSPLSE) of the infoprovider. The input ready query is also restricted with a variable on Column A (manual input single variable- mandatory).
While the user opens the Planning Layout and plans the data, we can see lock entry in RSPLSE(locks tab) for the Column A selection in the infoprovider, yet if another user is trying to plan for data for some other selection of Column A, a lock entry in RSPLSE is shown with the selection but it errors in thelayout with lock on the infoprovider and cannot plan the data.
Any inputs will be of great help.
Regards,
Priyanka

Post is closed.
Refer http://scn.sap.com/thread/3564212 for the solution.
Regards,
Priyanka

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

User1 locking other user (STS Locking Issue SAP IP)

(STS Locking Issue SAP IP)
User1 Is locking up other functional org layouts that he does not even have access to it.User of these layouts user2 gets message every time tries to allocate data that the Info provider is locked by user1 .
even though user1 does not have access to orgs that user 2 has.
How do i need to resolve this issue?

Hello,
if user1 locks all records for a second attribute (besides org) then this will also result in a lock of all records even though the org is distictive. Try to have a look in the lock overview of rsplan and possibly repost the lock arguments.
Hope that helps!
Cheers,
Yann

Integrated Planning - File upload - Locks issue

Hi
When we try to use file upload feature (planing function- how to guide) , it gives us error that says " Data is locked by user .....". We checked and we had one user in the layout so system had lock entry in SM12 transaction.
Is there any way - we can release the locks created by user before we execute the file upload process automatically so that we donot have to go to SM12 to delete it and then trigger upload process?
Is it recommended to delete such locks from SM12 using ABAP code ?
Please help.
Thanks
A

Hi ,
Pls chk this link for complete doc abt Locking in IP.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/44/588168ce8c08fae10000000a422035/content.htm
*pls assign points,if link is useful*
Regards
CSM reddy

Locking issue in workflow with conseutive database update

Dear Workflowers,
We are in ECC 5.0 and release 6.40. We went live for SAP in February and we are currently using workflow in PLM module for DMS and ECM.
We have been facing this locking issue randomly happened in our production and quality system. The error from workflow log is "Document XXXX is locked by WF-BATCH". I have two steps in workflow one is to update the document user( from originator to editor with custom BO "zdraw" new method "setuser") and the next step is to update the document status( BO "zdraw" "setstatus" method which inherited form standard BO "draw").
I have tried to use "wait" (1st try) , statements "BAPI_DOCUMENT_ENQUEUE", "BAPI_DOCUMENT_DEQUEUE" (2nd try) and "Commit work and wait" (3rd try) to add one step in between, however the issue remains.
The other question I had was we need to write "commit work" when we use BAPI to perform database update in the ABAP program. But I don't see "commit work" in the method of BO(for example "setstatus" in "draw" object) which performs database update. How does workflow perform DB update properly without "commit work" by referencing standard method?
Could anyone please share your expertise with the issue I am facing?
Thank you in advance,
Merta

Hi Merta,
Regarding COMMITs: theoretically you should never use COMMIT statements because the Workflow runtime handles that - the transaction of executing the task is the LUW, not your method. By adding COMMIT WORK you are also committing the workflow task execution.
In practice however there are the occasional exceptions where something just won't work without an explicit commit - but the theory remains that you should always try it without.
Regarding your problem, the one way to be certain that a DB update is complete is to use a terminating event - either through change documents or status management.
Failing that, you can write a wrapper method for SETSTATUS that does something like:
do 10 times.
try to lock it.
if success.
    unlock.
    swc_call_method self 'SetStatus' container.
    set success flag.
else.
    wait up to 3 seconds.
endif.
enddo.
if no success, raise exception.
Cheers,
Mike

User Lock issue when processing IDOCS

Hi Folks,
We are pushing the data into SAP using IDOCS.During this process some IDOCS are getting failed due to User Lock on shipment header.Anyone here can share their experience in dealing with User Lock issues.
Thanks,
Kiran.

Kiran,
Only one can edit the document, it's standard fucntion. I think No note can resolve this. I can suggest you to run a back ground job very frequently ,which picks these status 51 IDOCs and reprocess. Report is :RBDMANi2
We can use Message class & error message number on selection screen, so that we can make sure that only those idocs which were failed due to Lock problem are taken by the job.
Reddy

Windows 2008 R2 Screen Lock Issue (GPO)

Scenario: We will be deploying POS machines at our stores that will have Windows 2008 R2 as the preferred OS. The function of this POS machine is for POS administration and not for ringing up sales. The machines have been configured to autologin a specific
user via GPO for POS functions. Also, a specific POS desktop environment shell has been configured to launch instead of Explorer (explorer.exe) shell environment at autologon.
Everything seems to be working as expected except for the session of the user locking. Since the POS environment needs to be up at all times with the specific user profile, we do not want the OS to lock the user session. I've timed it and it seems to lock
the screen (not log off) at approximately 15 minutes of inactivity, we do not want this.
So far, these are the GPOs I have configured that have not fixed the issue:
Computer Configuration>Policies>Windows Settings>Security Settings>Local Policies>Security Options>Microsoft Network Server: Amount of idle time required before suspending session = 99999 minutes
Computer Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>System>Power Management>Sleep Settings>Allow applications to prevent automatic sleep (plugged in) = Enabled
Computer Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>System>Power Management>Sleep Settings>Require a password when a computer wakes (plugged in) = Disabled
Computer Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>System>Power Management>Sleep Settings>Turn off hybrid sleep (plugged in) = Enabled
Computer Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>System>Power Management>Sleep Settings>Turn on the ability for applications to prevent sleep transitions (plugged in) = Enabled
Computer Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>System>Power Management>Video and Display Settings>Turn off the display (plugged in) = Enabled = 99999 seconds
User Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>Control Panel>Personalization>Enable screen saver = Disabled
User Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>Control Panel>Personalization>Password protect the screen saver = Disabled
User Configuration>Policies>Administrative Templates>System>Ctrl+Alt+Del Options>Remove Lock Computer = Enabled
User Configuration>Preferences>Windows Settings>Registry>HKCU>Control Panel>Desktop>ScreenSaveActive = 0
What are we doing wrong? How do I configure the OS to not lock the user session but keep it active at all times?
As a side note: We have Windows 7 POS machines also that will be ringing up sales that we do not have the screen lock issue.

Hi,
>>Please see my setting indicated in my original post. We have Turn Off the Display set to 99999 seconds.
I understand that we have set the Turn Off the Display for this amount of time. However, just for double check, we can go to the power plan we are using to check if the setting has been applied successfully. If the setting has been applied successfully,
it should be grayed out. Or, we can run command gpresult/h gpreport.html
with admin privileges to collect group policy result report to check this.
Besides, do we use other third party software to protect our computer? We can try to clean boot the server to see if the situation persists.
Regarding how to perform a clean boot, the following article can be referred to for more information.
How to perform a clean boot in Windows
http://support.microsoft.com/KB/929135
TechNet Subscriber Support
If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
Best regards,
Frank Shen

How to resolve Oracle lock issue

Hi All,
What is Oracle lock issue in BW and how to resolve it.
Regards,
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
The object lock issues that we sometimes encounter in SAP BW production support role.
Lets take the below example where the InfoObject(0material) load has failed and the load monitor (T-Code: RSMO) looks like this.
Go through the link below
http://proradian.com/blog/2008/07/sap-bw-production-support-object-lock-issues/
Regards,
Marasa.

Integrated ITS: multiple sessions and locking issue

We are upgrading to ECC 6.0 from 4.6C and have Integrated ITS turned on. We have built a custom PZM3 as one entry and exit point for our ESS services. But we have issues with session management when navigating between some services like PZ14 and PZ02. The PZ14 session and the corresponding lock are not released upon going to the PZ02 service directly. But this happens for only some services. If you navigate between PZ02 and PZ12 it works fine. I followed the instructions of note# 959417, but it didn't work. Not only it is causing locking issues, but also memory usage issues as multiple user sessions are being created on the server. I did check some of posts similar to this one, but the issue still persists.
Our WAS release: 7.00; ABAP support package: SAPKB70009; Patch level: 75.
I would appreciate if anyone could shed some light on this issue. Thank you for your time and consideration.
Kshitij

Our Basis admin found out that using a parameter ~DISCONNECTONCLOSE = 1 would resolve most of this issues -- and it did. But now we are having issues with some users having popup blockers turned on. We referred to SAP notes 892250/596698-- followed it -- implemented it-- but some users
still have issues -- like today while working from home via VPN, I am having issues with session management. But working from office yesterday,
the sessions worked just fine.

Report Designer Locking issue

Hi,
We have found locking issue while accessing same report(Created in Report Designer) by multi users at a time .
Has anyone face this issue and How to fix it. It's major concern because same report can be accessed by multiusers at same time
Thanks
Siva

Siva,
only one person at a time has permission to open the report in the Report designer - just like with Queries in the query designer. This should not have any effect on you actually executing the report in the portal - multiple people can do it then.
this is a security issue that other software vendors use as well - just like you cannot open any MS Office files on the network for editing that someone has opened already.
Thanks

Dear All,what are the major issues in implementation in sap hcm

what are the major issues in implementation in SAP HCM project scope is PA ,OM,TIME, INDIA PAYROLL

Hi Ramjan,
Try to have a clear understanding of requirements and find the best solution in SAP. Keep as much as possible everything standard and based on SAP best practices.
In PA look for a comprehensive enterprise structure. It's base for everything.
DON"T do anything through development(ABAP code) as much as possible specially in PT and PY. Try to do claculation by PCRs and Schema.
Regards,
Omid

[ADF-11.1.2] Locking issue with SQL 92

I see one Locking issue with SQL92 Oracle ADF Application.
ADF Version: [ADF-11.1.2]
Database: Oracle 10g Express Edition
Situation 1:
With Following setting:
File: Application Resource > Description > ADF META-INF > adf-config.xml
    <startup>
      <amconfig-overrides>
        <config:Database jbo.SQLBuilder="SQL92" jbo.locking.mode="optimistic"/>
      </amconfig-overrides>
    </startup>I have a page showing record 'x' of view object. I open same record on another page. Now I have same record showing on two different tabs of browser.
1. I modify first record and save it. It worked... Got commited to database.
2. I goto second tab and modify same record and tried to same it. It throws me an error - Another user has changed the row with primary key oracle.jbo.Key[38 ] . As expected...
3. I then, reopen the same record on 3rd tab of browser. Modify it and tried to save it. It just hang... as if it is processing the record endlessly.
If I see the Log:
<BaseSQLBuilderImpl> <doEntitySelectForAltKey> [312] BaseSQLBuilderImpl Executing doEntitySelect ... (true)
<BaseSQLBuilderImpl> <doEntitySelectForAltKey> [313] Generating new LOCK statement
<BaseSQLBuilderImpl> <buildSelectString> [314] Built select: 'SELECT ID, CI_ID, COLUMN_NAME, DISPLAY_COLUMN_NAME, COLUMN_VALUE, CREATE_DATE, CREATE_BY FROM ESUSER.CI_AUDIT'
<BaseSQLBuilderImpl> <doEntitySelectForAltKey> [315] Executing LOCK "SELECT ID, CI_ID, COLUMN_NAME, DISPLAY_COLUMN_NAME, COLUMN_VALUE, CREATE_DATE, CREATE_BY FROM ESUSER.CI_AUDIT WHERE ID=? FOR UPDATE"
<BaseSQLBuilderImpl> <bindWhereAttrValue> [316] Where binding param 1: 38
That's it.. nothing happens further.. If I execute above query on SQL Worksheet, it doesn't come up with the result. Just hang for something...
SELECT ID, CI_ID, COLUMN_NAME, DISPLAY_COLUMN_NAME, COLUMN_VALUE, CREATE_DATE, CREATE_BY FROM ESUSER.CI_AUDIT WHERE ID='38' FOR UPDATE I can execute above query for other record of same table but not '38'. Even if I fire commit command to database, it is not working.
I have to restart the database services to bring everything to normal state.
Situation 2:
With Oracle as Database :
    <startup>
      <amconfig-overrides>
        <config:Database jbo.SQLBuilder="Oracle" jbo.locking.mode="optimistic"/>
      </amconfig-overrides>
    </startup>Everything is working file. i.e. at step 3, record is getting modified successfully with following log:
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <doEntitySelectForAltKey> [27] OracleSQLBuilder Executing doEntitySelect on: ESUSER.CI_AUDIT (true)
<ADFLogger> <begin> Entity read all attributes
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <buildSelectString> [28] Built select: 'SELECT ID, CI_ID, COLUMN_NAME, DISPLAY_COLUMN_NAME, COLUMN_VALUE, CREATE_DATE, CREATE_BY FROM ESUSER.CI_AUDIT CIAudit'
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <doEntitySelectForAltKey> [29] Executing LOCK...SELECT ID, CI_ID, COLUMN_NAME, DISPLAY_COLUMN_NAME, COLUMN_VALUE, CREATE_DATE, CREATE_BY FROM ESUSER.CI_AUDIT CIAudit WHERE ID=? FOR UPDATE NOWAIT
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Entity read all attributes
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <bindWhereAttrValue> [30] Where binding param 1: 38
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Entity read all attributes
<ADFLogger> <end> Entity read all attributes
<ADFLogger> <end> Lock Entity
<ADFLogger> <begin> Before posting the entity's changes
<ADFLogger> <begin> Updating audit columns
<ADFLogger> <end> Updating audit columns
<ADFLogger> <end> Before posting the entity's changes
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <doEntityDML> [31] OracleSQLBuilder Executing, Lock 2 DML on: ESUSER.CI_AUDIT (Update)
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <buildUpdateStatement> [32] UPDATE buf CIAudit>#u SQLStmtBufLen: 210, actual=60
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <doEntityDML> [33] UPDATE ESUSER.CI_AUDIT CIAudit SET COLUMN_VALUE=? WHERE ID=?
<ADFLogger> <begin> Entity DML
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <bindUpdateStatement> [34] Update binding param 1: cip7ri1
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl> <bindWhereAttrValue> [35] Where binding param 2: 38
<ADFLogger> <addContextData> Entity DML
<ADFLogger> <end> Entity DML
Can any one please tell me, what is the issue with SQL92 setting ?
Edited by: Anandsagar Sah on Mar 11, 2012 8:10 AM

The framework works correctly in the Situation #1. Please, note that the locking statement in this case is "SELECT ... FOR UPDATE", but not "SELECT ... FOR UPDATE NOWAIT" (as it is in the Situation #2). When you entered the 2nd tab and tried to update the row, then the framework executed the locking statement and the row was locked (and it remained locked because the framework detected that another user had modified the row, so it stopped the processing and no COMMIT operation was executed). When you entered the 3rd tab and tried to update the row, then the framework tried to lock the row againg, but the locking statement was blocked by the existign lock and it started waiting on the lock from the 2nd tab. So this is expected behaviour.
The interesting question is why you do not get any error in the Situation #2. In my opinion you should get an error because the locking statement from the 3rd tab should fail immediately (because the row should have been locked from the 2nd tab and the locking statement is with NOWAIT option). I suspect that when the DB is Oracle and you use Oracle SQLBuilder, then the ADF issues a DB savepoint at the beginning of the DML operation and rolls back to the savepoint is a case of some failure, so the 2nd tab has not left any lock. You can check this by setting on SQL trace on the DB server.
Dimitar

Purchase order locking issue

Hi ,
We are processing IDoc. The IDoc FM does GR of STO by using MIGO transaction via BDC , then FM also does GR of STO Delivery number by using VL02N transaction . MIGO transaction is successful but while doing GR of STO Delivery number via VL02N we are getting an error like ' Purchase order XXXXXXXXXX is currently locked by user XXXXXX .
This happens if we process the IDoc in background . If I process the IDoc in foreground by putting breakpoint at MIGO and VL02N , it executes successfully .
I feel it is a locking issue . I tried using FM DEQUEUE_ALL , MM_DEQUEUE_DOCUMENT after MIGO but it did not work out .
Please suggest for any pointers on this locking issue .
Regards,
Kiran.

Forget about WAIT statement.
Use:
set update task local.
...before starting MIGO.
regards

FOR UPDATE cursor is causing Blocking/ Dead Locking issues

Hi,
I am facing one of the complex issues regarding blocking / dead locking issues. Please find below the details and help / suggest me the best approach to ahead with that.
Its core Investment Banking Domain, in Our Day to day Business we are using many transaction table for processing trades and placing the order. In specific there are two main transaction table
1)     Transaction table 1
2)     Transaction table 2
These both the tables are having huge amount of data. In one of our application to maintain data integrity (During this process we do not want other users to change these rows), we have placed SELECT …………….. FOR UPDATE CURSOR on these two table and we have locked all the rows during the process. And we have batch jobs (shell scripts ) , calling this procedure , we will be running 9 times per day 1 hrs each start at 7:15AM in the morn finish it up in the eve 5PM . Let’s say. The reason we run the same procedure multiple times is, our business wants to know the voucher before its finalized. Because there is a possibility that order can be placed and will be updated/cancelled several times in a single day. So at the end of the day , we will be sending the finalized update to our client.
20 07 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 08 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 09 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 10 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 11 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 12 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 13 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 14 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 15 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 16 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
20 17 * * 1-5 home/bin/app_process_prc.sh >> home/bin/app1/process.out
Current Program will look like:
App_Prc_1
BEGIN
/***** taking the order details (source) and will be populate into the table ****/
CURSOR Cursor_Upload IS
SELECT col1, col2 … FROM Transaction table1 t 1, Source table 1 s
WHERE t1.id_no = t2.id_no
AND t1.id_flag = ‘N’
FOR UPDATE OF t1.id_flag;
/************* used for inserting the another entry , if theres any updates happened on the source table , for the records inserted using 1st cursor. **************/
CURSOR cursor_update IS
SELECT col1, col2 … FROM transaction table2 t2 , transaction table t1
WHERE t1.id_no = t2.id_no
AND t1.id_flag = ‘Y’
AND t1.DML_ACTION = ‘U’,’D’ -- will retrieve the records which are updated and deleted recently for the inserted records in transaction table 1 for that particular INSERT..
FOR UPDATE OF t1.id_no,t1.id_flag;
BLOCK 1
BEGIN
FOR v_upload IN Cursor_Upload;
LOOP
INSERT INTO transaction table2 ( id_no , dml_action , …. ) VALUES (v_upload.id_no , ‘I’ , … ) RETURNING v_upload.id_no INTO v_no -- I specify for INSERT
/********* Updating the Flag in the source table after the population ( N into Y ) N  order is not placed yet , Y  order is processed first time )
UPDATE transaction table1
SET id_FLAG = ‘Y’
WHERE id_no = v_no;
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION WHEN OTHER THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( );
END ;
BLOCK 2
BEGIN -- block 2 starts
FOR v_update IN Cursor_Update;
LOOP;
INSERT INTO transaction table2 ( id_no ,id_prev_no, dml_action , …. ) VALUES (v_id_seq_no, v_upload.id_no ,, … ) RETURNING v_upload.id_no INTO v_no
UPDATE transaction table1
SET id_FLAG = ‘Y’
WHERE id_no = v_no;
END LOOP;
EXCEPTION WHEN OTHER THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE( );
END; -- block2 end
END app_proc; -- Main block end
Sample output in Transaction table1 :
Id_no | Tax_amt | re_emburse_amt | Activ_DT | Id_Flag | DML_ACTION
01 1,835 4300 12/JUN/2009 N I ( these DML Action will be triggered when ever if theres in any DML operation occurs in this table )
02 1,675 3300 12/JUN/2009 Y U
03 4475 6500 12/JUN/2009 N D
Sample output in Transaction table2 :
Id_no | Prev_id_no Tax_amt | re_emburse_amt | Activ_DT
001 01 1,835 4300 12/JUN/2009 11:34 AM ( 2nd cursor will populate this value , bcoz there s an update happened for the below records , this is 2nd voucher
01 0 1,235 6300 12/JUN/2009 09:15 AM ( 1st cursor will populate this record when job run first time )
02 0 1,675 3300 12/JUN/2009 8:15AM
003 03 4475 6500 12/JUN/2009 11:30 AM
03 0 1,235 4300 12/JUN/2009 10:30 AM
Now the issues is :
When these Process runs, our other application jobs failing, because it also uses these main 2 tranaction table. So dead lock is detecting in these applications.
Solutin Needed :
Can anyone suggest me , like how can rectify this blocking /Locking / Dead lock issues. I wants my other application also will use this tables during these process.
Regards,
Maran

hmmm.... this leads to a warning:
SQL> ALTER SESSION SET PLSQL_WARNINGS='ENABLE:ALL';
Session altered.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE MYPROCEDURE
AS
   MYCOL VARCHAR(10);
BEGIN
   SELECT col2
   INTO MYCOL
   FROM MYTABLE
   WHERE col1 = 'ORACLE';
EXCEPTION
   WHEN PIERRE THEN
      NULL;
END;
SP2-0804: Procedure created with compilation warnings
SQL> show errors
Errors for PROCEDURE MYPROCEDURE:
LINE/COL                                                                          ERROR
     12/9        PLW-06009: procedure “MYPROCEDURE” PIERRE handler does not end in RAISE or RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR
     :)

Locking Issue in Planning DSO- SAP BW 7.3 Integarted Planning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for