Locking/protecting environment values ?

The manual recommends that you never assign two audio objects to the same channel.
Wow... I did that by accident today, and it's horribly confusing. I created two channel strips assigned to the same output track, and it's a mess--you get two channel strips with different names, so they look like two different objects in the track mixer, but they're effectively the same object. Any changes to one of the objects (fader, pan, insert, etc.) take effect on both objects.
I can't think of a reason why anyone would ever want this behavior. Maybe someone else can ? Actually, I don't really understand what is to be gained by having an adjustable channel assignment for a track object, anyway. Is there some power here that I'm not seeing ? Would Logic lose functionality if it forced all track objects to be assigned to unique channels ?
I'm new to Logic, so I'm looking for any tips in how to avoid shooting myself in the foot with arrange tracks, audio objects, and output channels.
As best I can tell, once I create a track assigned to an audio object, I am almost never going to want to change that audio object assignment. And I can't see why I would EVER want to change the output channel assigned to a track object.
Is there some way to lock these settings so they aren't easily changed by an errant mouse click in the arrange window ? I want to leave the object parameters visible so I can change the instrument name easily, but having those object and channel settings immediately available to be changed seems like a problem waiting to happen. If either of those settings gets changed to match another arrange track, I'm likely to have what are effectively overlapping regions, so I'll stop hearing regions that are still visible in the arrange window.
Is there any way to lock these settings so they can't be screwed up once they're set ?
Alternatively, is there any way to get Logic to identify audio objects that are incorrectly assigned to the same output channel ? And is there any way to get Logic to identify audio regions that aren't literally "overlapping" on the same arrange track, but are nevertheless still effectively "overlapping" because they're assigned to the same audio object ? I'd like to be confident that everything I see in the arrange window is actually going to play, and it seems like there are a bunch of ways this can go wrong.
I'm new to Logic, and I'm still getting a feel for the workflow--thanks for any tips!
James
[email protected]
Dual 1.25 G4   Mac OS X (10.4.8)  

I was also wondering if it made sense to rename the
environment object, or just add a track name. It
seems
like it will be less confusing to keep the
environment
object as created: Audio 1, Audio 2, Instrument 1,
Instrument 2.
That's the way I like it, but other tastes differ. I
like to know on what and where I'm putting my audio,
but I have seen other people not care about this -
they just find a free track, regardless of where it
is and of they go.
Interesting--my concern is that since the output channels can still be changed easily, the default instrument names (Audio 1, Audio 2, etc.) seem less useful to me. i.e. your object might be called "Audio 1," but that doesn't necessarily bear any relation to anything physical inside or outside the computer. Maybe I'm not conscientious enough about managing my tracks, but the way I see it, I really shouldnly RELY on the instrument names to reflect channel assignments if this is something that I (or any musician touching the computer during a break...) can easily screw up. I'm leaning toward naming the objects with typical track names ("Lead VOX," etc.), especially since that gives me meaningful audio file naming without the need for separate track names (Use Audio Object Name for File Name).
But, the saving grace in all of this for me may be "Create Multiple..."
"Create Multiple" does exactly what I WISH "Create with Next Instrument" would do (too bad the names are ambiguous): "Create Multiple" creates a new track (or several) with an unused instrument--it grabs an object out of the Environment if one exists, and it creates a new object if the Environment doesn't have one. Perfect! ("Create with Next Instrument" may or may not assign an unused instrument--that's not very useful in my opinion... seems to me that when you need a new track, you very clearly want either a used instrument or an unused instrument--you don't want uncertainty, or to have to reference the Environment to see what instruments exist...)
Anyway, since I found I can set the default inputs and outputs for objects in the "Audio Configuration," I'm thinking maybe there isn't much point in having extra objects in the Environment at all. Just use "Create Multiple" to create a new track, and you automatically get a new, unused output object. Simple. And the "Create" command works great when you want a new "take" for an existing instrument.
As a new user to Logic, I was left with the impression that the "right" way to work is to create enough objects in the Environment to handle most expected work. But for audio and instrument tracks, personally, I'm thinking it's WAY less confusing just to use "Create Multiple" to create tracks and objects only as I need them, rather than to start with a "big job" environment as created by the Setup Assistant.
Hey, this frustrated me for a while, and I found a solution that is working for me, so I thought I'd share, in case anyone else finds it useful.
There is one problem, though--I haven't figured out how to control which Environment layer gets the objects made by "Create Multiple"... I'll post a separate question about that.
Thanks for all the advice, Bee Jay, and iSchwartz!
James
[email protected]

Similar Messages

  • Web Services with a Site minder protected Environment

    Hi All,
    I am not sure this is the right group to post this, if not let me know what is the best group or forum to post this.
    I am having a problem with invocation of web services which are protected by a site minder SSO. I am trying to access them from the same site minder protected environment.
    But I am not able to invoke them.
    Please let me know what is the better way to invoke them and is there a way or not? In general if a web services is protected by any kind of SSO then how do we invoke the protected web service?
    Thanks
    Vasu

    If a webservice is protected by a SSO, I don't think you can bypass it without authentication. Coming to Site Minder it should expose the authentication functionality as another web service, so that you go through the SM service first and then to the original webservice. Given that we have been authenticated in the 1st call, SM should allow you in to the 2nd call.
    We also have SM in our environment and use one such authentication service for login.
    You can check with your SM team for this and accordingly proceed.
    Thanks,
    Patrick

  • Is it possible to lock a single value in a table

    is it possible to lock a single value in a table ?
    please suggest me the best possible ways to do so
    thanks in advance
    Nkbhatt

    HI,
    You can lock a Single reocrd also, you need to create the Lock object first form SE11, then follow the below link, you will get your answer
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/af/22ab01dd0b11d1952000a0c929b3c3/content.htm
    Regards
    Sudheer

  • Locking/Protecting cells

    I am new to this forum, therefore I apologize if I cross the rules here as I am sure this has been asked before, however I can not see a search feature on my screen to search past posts.
    I am trying to lock/protect certain cells, rows and columns so that poeple are unable to change them in the template. Is this possible in Numbers? I know how to do this in Excel... hoping there will be a way in Numbers

    Numbers does not have an equivalent feature to cell-locking. The closest that you can come to this is to lock an entire Table. You can get creative and divide input and output between unlocked and locked tables, and you can abut the tables to make them look like a single table. Next best is to protect the formula cells by placing a clear shape over them and locking the shape.
    Regards,
    Jerry

  • How to set locking for all values of a char other than using query

    Hi Friends,
    any suggestions?  I like to explicitly lock all possible values of a particular characteristic in a cube without using a filter.
    thanks!!
    Cran
    Edited by: Cranberry CranCran on Jan 31, 2008 4:48 PM

    If you dont restrict the characteristic using any value in the filter, then all values will be locked.

  • Passcode lock protection" prior to power-off for mobile Apple devices

    I would like to make a suggestion for an enhanced security operating procedure for Apple devices, with the purpose of detecting a device after it has been stolen.
    This idea has occurred to me after an unfortunate personal experience. In particular, two months ago there was an incident where my backpack with four Apple devices belonging to myself and my wife (two iphones and two ipads) was stolen.
    Immediately after the theft, within the next 10 minutes, I managed to gain access to a computer.
    Although I had activated the service “find my iphone” and “find my ipad” respectively, I soon found out that the devices were already offline, which means that the first thing that the thieves did was to power them off.  Please note that all devices were “passcode lock protected”.
    The enhanced security proposal I would like make is the following:
    A command to be added to the operating system according to which, in order to be able to power-off the device, the user will have to give the valid passcode. In other words, I am suggesting a “passcode lock protection” prior to power-off and not just prior to power-on. By means of this arrangement, and as long as batteries last, the stolen devices may be located.
    Thank you for your time.
    Best regards
    George Paidas

    http://www.apple.com/feedback/ipad.html

  • Lock on environment init / FreeBSD 4.x

    We experience problem with mutexes.
    We tried Berkeley DB 3.x and 4.5. We use FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE.
    Initialization looks like that:
    my $global_env = new BerkeleyDB::Env
    -Home => $Path::Cache,
    -Flags => BerkeleyDB::DB_INIT_MPOOL() | BerkeleyDB::DB_INIT_CDB() | BerkeleyDB::DB_CREATE() | BerkeleyDB::DB_SYSTEM_MEM(),
    -LockDetect => BerkeleyDB::DB_LOCK_DEFAULT(),
    -SharedMemKey => $bdb_shmem_id;
    We have many concurrent processes, two of them write and others read.
    After some time all processes lock. If we run any new process then it locks on environment initialization. All db_* utilities get locked after start as well.
    After debugging we found that it seems like when any of processes die with signal (e.g. SIGSEGV or SIGBUS) then it leaves a mutex which others cannot overcome.
    We found that processes are stuck in LOCK_SYSTEM_LOCK
    Please, advise.

    Hi user629837,
    In a multiprocess environment, if you have process shared mutex and while holding a lock using LOCK_SYSTEM_LOCK macro a process exits (SIGSEGV or SIGBUS), the rest of the system will remain locked for ever. The application therefore should be designed carefully so that such situation doesn't arise.
    If using CDS, the subsystem flags like DB_INIT_LOCK, DB_INIT_TXN or DB_RECOVER should not be used. The DB_CREATE flag should be used if the database have to be created the first time or recreated after cleanup. Refer to the "Berkeley DB Concurrent Data Store Applications" section in Reference guide of BDB for more information.
    Regards,
    Debsubhra

  • SharedObjects environment value not updating properly in clustered environment

    Hi All,
    I have clustered UCM having two nodes. I have custom scheduler running every 5 minutes which updates some value in SharedObjects environment. I am using following code:
    SharedObjects.putEnvironmentValue("param", "val");
    the problem is that this value is updated only in one node. If Node1 picks up the scheduler job, then the value is updated only on Node1.
    Next time when Node2 picks up the scheduler job, Node2 does have have updated value and my application fails.
    Any idea why it is happening. How can I fix this issue?
    Thanks

    Hi All,
    I have clustered UCM having two nodes. I have custom scheduler running every 5 minutes which updates some value in SharedObjects environment. I am using following code:
    SharedObjects.putEnvironmentValue("param", "val");
    the problem is that this value is updated only in one node. If Node1 picks up the scheduler job, then the value is updated only on Node1.
    Next time when Node2 picks up the scheduler job, Node2 does have have updated value and my application fails.
    Any idea why it is happening. How can I fix this issue?
    Thanks

  • How can I lock/protect the datas in my lost MacBook Pro which runs in OS X. I have installed Mac keeper and activated theft lock.

    Lost my Mac book Pro and I want to protect all my data in it. I have installed Mac keeper in my MacBook Pro and have activated theft  lock. Now who and where should I report the loss of my MacBook Pro?.

    Police
    Change all of your passwords

  • How to lock  (protect) a cell

    I've a cell with a formula, that i want to be locked just to give the result, but i don't find that option. can anyone help me? Thanks

    Not a problem here as far as I can tell. When does it revert back? Does it not take at all or does it revert back when you type a new date/time in the cell or does it revert back when you close/reopen the document? Or are you expecting the time format you chose for one cell to become a global setting and apply to any new cells in which you enter date/time values? If so, it doesn't work this way. It would be great if it did, especially if you could add recursion and scripting.
    You might try it with a new document and see if it works there.
    What do you mean by "saving formulas", do you mean you would like to write your own custom functions that you could then choose from the function browser or type in (i.e., function name and a few parameters, like the built-in functions)? If that's what you are asking, Numbers doesn't have it.
    On a side note, it is better to start new a thread for a new question unrelated to the message topic. It makes it easier for others to find it later.

  • Locking/Protecting Playlists

    Hi There
    I would really like to know if it is possible to lock or protect a playlist so that it cannot be deleted? I tend to really want to listen to my playlists when i come in after a bit of a night out, but this has led to me rather frustratingly deleting a playlist or two.
    any help you can give me would be greatly appreciated.
    cheers.

    It's not possible to lock a Playlist but you can try a little simple work-around.
    If you right-click the playlist name you'll see the "Export Song List" option, wich will let you create a .txt file with the name of the songs on the playlist.
    You can keep your .txt files so, if for some reason you lose your playlist, check them and be able to recover it knowing what it had inside.
    There is also a "Burn To Disc" feature but this would require to to burn as many discs as playlists you have.

  • Access Connections v4.52 - user rights in locked down environment

    I'm currently working on a small project to deploy various Lenovo wireless drivers, Access Connections v4.52, Hotkey and Power Management drivers via SMS but have come across a slight issue with Access Connections that I can't seem to resolve.
    I'm hoping to provide my locked down users with a selection of standard profiles that are copied to their machines on logon but would also like to give them the ability to create and modify new ones too - this is where I'm having problems.
    Through Group Policy I have set:
    Allow Windows users without administrator privileges to create and apply WLAN location profiles using Find Wireless Network function
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Lenovo\AccessConnection\EnableCreateProfilewithFWN 1
    Allow Windows users without administrator privileges to create and apply location profiles
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Lenovo\AccessConnection\EnableUserMode 1
    I have also manually set the following:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\Access Connections\Install\AllowPrfCreationThruFWN 1
    I couldn't find a key for the 'EnableUserMode' option
    Unfortunately, none of these give standard users access to create or modify profiles.
    Have any of you come across this in your environment and if so did you manage to come up with a suitable solution?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    the steps, that you performed are correct.
    However I would not do the last step:
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Lenovo\Access Connections\Install\AllowPrfCreationThruFWN 1
    This might cause confusiong.
    I have just tested it in here and it's working fine with the 5.x version of AC
    Cheers

  • [locked] Protect from copy

    Hi all,
    I have 2 question that hope can be answer by others here.
    1st: if I was developing an interactive presentation or elearning application using Flash, how do i protect it from being copy. I heard that we have to set the CRC seting ect' but I'm not so sure how or is it working.
    2nd: if i already burn it into a CD, how do I make sure its hard(if posible prevent 100%) for the others to copy, but they still can acces the file?I did try few software it did lock the CD but also lock the application and cant be acces...
    thats it..
    thanks.

    The Flash forums are here:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/flash
    This forum is only for discussions on the forums themselves.

  • How can i lock (Protect) my phone??!!

    Hi, everybody
    I would asking about how can i protect my phone with password, cause every time i try this it just request (PIN) number but no phone protection code....!!
    1- in my phone when i go to: Setting - securtiy settings - phone security,,, then enter the code (12345) and active it (ON),,, the phone still just request the (PIN Number) without another protection,,, and when i remove my SIM card there is no protection code requests and the phone start in normal...... that in my phone ((Nokia 107))
    *So What is that Phone security option...??!!!
    *How can i lock my phone with password at its start??!!
    =============================================================================
    2- in my phone (Asha 303) when i go to: setting - security,,,, i didnt find ((phone protection)) option Basically...!!,,,, but when i go to (Change Acess Codes) i find ((Security code)) but what is the benefit of changing it as there isnt option to active it???
    *Note: here when i try to change that security code its also 12345 (as default old number)....
    *** Also what is the ((Security module)) option i found in my Asha 303 security option, and how to use it??

    Hi Moron,
    Setting up the security keyguard is one of the options for you to protect your phone from anyone who will access your phone. Another option is to download an app that allows you to protect your phone as well. You may try to search it from the Nokia Store. Here's the link: 
    http://store.ovi.com/
    Hope this helps. 

  • Lock / Protect Tracks Button?

    Hi everyone. I have a few tracks with the "lock" button selected, and I noticed if I try to change something on the track/regions in the tracks via a command (for example, change the region color so regions colors match tracks, or change the NAME of the regions to match the tracks names, etc.) I get a dialog box that the track is protected/locked and no changes can be made, with a CANCEL button. I hit CANCEL, and the CHANGES HAPPEN ANYWAY! What's the deal with this button, does it only work on/prevent certain commands? Let me know, thanks

    I experienced the same strange behaviour.
    I would call this a bug or a not well implemented feature.
    Send a feedback to Apple.
    Eddie

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to find out that the card in a given NIDAQ slot is a DSA card?

    In the description of DAQ_Op(...) function in the traditional NIDAQ function reference one reads: "buffer" is an integer array. "buffer" has a length equal to or greater than count. When DAQ_Op returns with an error number equal to zero, buffer conta

  • Programmed binding

    Hi there, I'm using a function module to implement the container to container binding (BOR). It is based on the  template SWA_TEMPLATE_EXECUTE_DATAFLOW. Unfortunatelly the macro SWC_GET_PROPERTY does  not return a value. *Direction of the dataflow  

  • Inbound process code for LOIPRO

    Hi, Can anyone tell me the inbound process code used for LOIPRO(Production Order)message type? Regards, Jeyananth

  • Sharing multiple files

    Is it possible to share multiple files with those I e-mail? Thanks fletcheraj

  • [b]Width of a Layout Model[/b]

    Hi ! In Report 6i, I want to print with format A3, I have to use matriciel printer whose portrait orientation is landscape's ink jet or laser printer. I need a physical page composed with one logical page, both have width 29 cm. In fact, in the Layou