Lockup during POST

Hello,
Can you help me ?
My customer has a Dell Optplex GX240 with 128mb and processor P4 1.7ghz. The motherboard has a chipset Intell 845. After to install a PCI GPIB Card NI 488.2, the system lockup during POST and appears follow message "i/o card parity interrupt at f000:db47".
We have tested in all slots, but the problem persist.
How can we solve that problem ?
Thanks in advanced.

Sounds like the board is bad.
Have you done anything to prove otherwise?
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Similar Messages

Issue in wm during posting differences in li21

Hi
i have an issue in ecc6 R/3 sap LE-WM, when i am doing confirmation in LT12 and haveing some differences that are posted to the 999 storage type. When i am clearing differences in LI21 i am getting error NO MATERIAL DOCUMENT WAS CREATED, ERRORS OCCURED DURING POSTING, THERE IS NO ITEM CATEGORY ASSIGNED TO ACCOUNT 233000/INT. hOW TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM
Narendra kumar

Hello Narendra,
When you clear the inventory difference with LI21 at that time system is trying to create material document and to post the difference in this g/l account "233000" for CoA INT and it finds problem.
Please copy the detailed message or contact FI expert.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Error occurred during post handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for UPDR L

Hi friends,
I need your help for 2 issues related to transport
I am getting error while transporting the request from BW DEV to BW QAS..Please help me regarding this issue..
1.)Error occurred during post handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for UPDR L
       The errors affect the following components:
      BW-WHM (Warehouse Management)
2.)Start of the after-import method RS_UPDR_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) UPDR (Activation Mode)
       Error when activating update rule
       IC=0CRM_PROD IS=0PR_IL_PROREF_ATTR error when checking update rules.
Friends these are the two issues im facing while doing the transports._i have checked the update rules in the BW DEV it is working fine._please give some solutions to overcome this issues.
Thanks
Gnana Baskar

Hi Gnana,
Since u r telling tht the update rules are working fine in the Dev system, request u to perform some checks:
1. The Update rule needs to be in active version.
2. The InfoObjects used in the target InfoProvider should be present in the QA system/attached to the request in which u r transporting the changed Update Rule.
3. Manually add objects, if needed all the Before/After objects in the new request and reactivate the Update rule, if it asks for a request give this new request number.
4. Compare the data model in Dev and QA system and try finding the disconnect between them.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kunal Gandhi

How to find out the changes made during posting the invoice in MIRO

Hi Friends,
During posting an invoice in MIRO somebody changed the invoicing party which differs from the vendor which was in PO. Is there any way out to see the record of changes, like who has changed & at what time.
Replies will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Rutabhadra Panda

Hi Rutabhadra
you can see the Document change in the Table CDHDR
t code : SE 16
table CDHDR
object : IncomingInvoice
execute this
see the change time and name
Regards
Vikrant

Error during Post Goods Issue of Material in VL02N for STO Purchase Order

I am getting one error message during Post goods issue of Material for STO Purchase order.
I am doing the Post goods issue in T code VL02N
Error is " Account type D is not defined for Document type WL"
What is the settings required to be done.
Thanks,
Shailendra

Please check Plant customer master reconsilation account properly maintained or not in XD03 transaction.

Va01:errors during posting sales order

Hi there,
can anyone help me on the error log during posting sales order via va01? the checking of sales order is correct.
Runtime Errors         MESSAGE_TYPE_X
Date and Time          2009.02.17 10:11:37
Short dump has not been completely stored (too big)
|Short text          |
|    The current application triggered a termination with a short dump. |
|What happened?      |
|    The current application program detected a situation which really   |
|    should not occur. Therefore, a termination with a short dump was    |
|    triggered on purpose by the key word MESSAGE (type X). |
|What can you do?    |
|    Note down which actions and inputs caused the error.   |
|       |
|       |
|    To process the problem further, contact you SAP system |
|    administrator. |
|       |
|    Using Transaction ST22 for ABAP Dump Analysis, you can look         |
|    at and manage termination messages, and you can also   |
|    keep them for a long time.   |
|Error analysis      |
|    Short text of error message: |
|    Maintain the current CRM release (table CRMPAROLTP)    |
|       |
|    Long text of error message: |
|     Diagnosis      |
|         Various transfer errors occur when transferring SAP sales orders to         |
|         CRM or there is no status update or the status update has errors            |
|         when transferring from CRM to the SAP system. This is caused by an          |
|         incorrect entry for the CRM release in the SAP table CRMPAROLTP, or         |
|         no entry is maintained at all.       |
|     System Response|
|         To avoid data inconsistencies, this message causes a short dump.            |
|     Procedure      |
|         Maintain table CRMPAROLTP in your SAP system as is described in SAP         |
|         Note 691710 and then repeat the process again.    |
|     Procedure for System Administration      |
|       |
|    Technical information about the message: |
|    Message class....... "V3"    |
|    Number.............. 302     |
|    Variable 1.......... " "     |
|    Variable 2.......... " "     |
|    Variable 3.......... " "     |
|    Variable 4.......... " "     |
|How to correct the error         |
|    Probably the only way to eliminate the error is to correct the program.          |
|    - |
|       |
|    If the error occures in a non-modified SAP program, you may be able to           |
|    find an interim solution in an SAP Note. |
|    If you have access to SAP Notes, carry out a search with the following           |
|    keywords:       |
|       |
|    "MESSAGE_TYPE_X" " "         |
|    "SAPMV45A" or "MV45AF0B_BAPIDATEN_ERMITTELN"           |
|    "BAPIDATEN_ERMITTELN"        |
|       |
|    If you cannot solve the problem yourself and want to send an error |
|    notification to SAP, include the following information:|
|       |
|    1. The description of the current problem (short dump) |
|       |
|       To save the description, choose "System->List->Save->Local File |
|    (Unconverted)". |
|       |
|    2. Corresponding system log |
|       |
|       Display the system log by calling transaction SM21. |
|       Restrict the time interval to 10 minutes before and five minutes |
|    after the short dump. Then choose "System->List->Save->Local File   |
|    (Unconverted)". |
|       |
|    3. If the problem occurs in a problem of your own or a modified SAP |
|    program: The source code of the program   |
|       In the editor, choose "Utilities->More |
|    Utilities->Upload/Download->Download".    |
|       |
|    4. Details about the conditions under which the error occurred or which          |
|    actions and input led to the error.       |
|       |
|User and Transaction|
|    Client.............. 200     |
|    User................ "SAMSON"|
|    Language key........ "E"     |
|    Transaction......... "VA01 " |
|    Program............. "SAPMV45A"           |
|    Screen.............. "SAPMV45A 4001"      |
|    Screen line......... 65      |
|Information on where terminated |
|    Termination occurred in the ABAP program "SAPMV45A" - in "BAPIDATEN_ERMITTELN". |
|    The main program was "SAPMV45A ".         |
|       |
|    In the source code you have the termination point in line 338       |
|    of the (Include) program "MV45AF0B_BAPIDATEN_ERMITTELN".            |
|Source Code Extract |
|Line |SourceCde     |
| 308|    else.     |
| 309|*-----Nicht unterstu9EF7zt, Abbruch        |
| 310|      message a301(v3).    |
| 311|    endif.    |
| 312| endif.      |
| 313| |
| 314|*-Szenario A pru9EE4en        |
| 315| if lv_scenario_a   = 'A'.|
| 316|    vbak-vbkla+2(1) = lv_scenario_a.    |
| 317| endif.      |
| 318| |
| 319|*-ermitteln CRM-Release    |
| 320| call function func_name |
| 321|        exporting          |
| 322|            i_paraname = 'CRM_RELEASE' |
| 323|        importing          |
| 324|            e_parval1 = lv_parval1.    |
| 325| lv_release_crm = lv_parval1+0(3).     |
| 326| |
| 327|* If lv_release_crm empty => X-message (correct download not possible)         |
| 328| if da_download_active = charx.        |
| 329|    CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_CONNECTED'       |
| 330|     IMPORTING|
| 331|       CRM_CONNECTED       = lv_crm_connected        |
| 332|     EXCEPTIONS            |
| 333|       NO_CRMRFCPAR        = 1          |
| 334|       OTHERS = 2          |
| 335| .            |
| 336|    IF sy-subrc = 0 and lv_release_crm = space and   |
| 337|       lv_crm_connected = charx.        |
|>>>>>|        message x302(v3). |
| 339|    ENDIF.    |
| 340|   endif.     |
| 341| |
| 342|*-Fu9EEElen der View fu9EF5 das Ermitteln der Auftragstabellen          |
| 343| da_sales_view-partner    = charx.     |
| 344| da_sales_view-sdcond     = charx.     |
| 345| da_sales_view-sdcond_add = charx.     |
| 346| da_sales_view-contract   = charx.     |
| 347| da_sales_view-text       = charx.     |
| 348|*-bei mehr als 1000 Belegflusssu92DEzen werden Daten nicht ermittelt |
| 349| if lv_tabix_vbfa < 1000. |
| 350|    da_sales_view-flow     = charx.     |
| 351| endif.      |
| 352| da_sales_view-billplan   = charx.     |
| 353| da_sales_view-configure = charx.     |
| 354| da_sales_view-credcard   = charx.     |
| 355| |
| 356|*-Im Standardszenario soll eine manuelle u818Ederung eines CRM Belegs|
| 357|* (ab CRM Release 30A) nicht zuru9EDEk ins CRM gesendet werden. Das |
any responses will be awarded,
regards,
samson

Hi,
Maintain the current CRM release.
The dump might have occurred when transferring SAP sales order to CRM.
This has caused a error in SAP table CRMPAROLTP .
Go to SE91 provide the message class & message number, then click where-used-list & select the program check box.It will show you the program name MV45AF0B_BAPIDATEN_ERMITTELN.
Just check the program with the ABAPer.
Hope this helps.
Regds.......
Sumit

Payment terms and Baseline date deact. during posting

Is it possible to deactivate fields: Payment terms and Baseline date in FB60 and MIRO so that the user can't change them? Terms of payment are defined in Vendor Master Data and shouldn't be changed during posting.

Hi,
You can use Screen Variants using T.Code SHD0 . You can make certain field as display only. You can use the help of your abapers......
Assign points if found useful
Regards,
R.Ramakrishnaraj

Checking for business area during posting

I need to check for business area balancing during posting of documents.
Eg: if we receive bank interest income for a bank account from a business area Y then the entries should be credited into same business area Y
Dr Bank - Y
Cr Interest income - X
this should not occur
user wants to have an error message if the entries doest balance the business area while posting a document
can any one plz tell me how this can be done?(does fi validations help in this?)

Hi all
Can any one help me solve this...
we have several business areas but use only one 'bank interest received' GL account. So when posting the entries it should check for the business area in this gl acccount with the BA in the customer(bank ) acc.
I tried to create validation at document level but it is not giving the message..
thnx
sravanthi

Strange Alert during post on ThinkPad X200

Hello,
I have ThinkPad X200 7454-2HU
Yestarday I notice some strange Alert during post process it's somthing like this:
Alert Sending Device UDID = C10AC866 5FE839FD 2E8B2E68 1FE8FE9B 00000065 06
Vendor/Device = C8665FE8 Address = 5FE839FD 2E8B2E68 1FE8FE9B 00000065 06
Vendor/Device = C8665FE8 Address = 65 -PSA with PEC Silicon Revision = 02
I get allot of alerts like this and after it the boot process continue normally and the computer work normally.
Any idea what can cause this? Is there any problem in the computer?
I attached image of the boot process - http://img690.imageshack.us/img690/5527/p1000612e.jpg
Thanks
Shahaf

Cool!
Just in case you need the original specs of your X200
X200 7459-VEY
P8600(2.4GHz), 4GB RAM, 160GB 7200rpm HD, 12.1in 1280x800 LCD, Intel 4500MHD, Intel 802.11agn wireless, WWAN upgradeable, Modem, 1Gb Ethernet, Secure chip, Camera, 4c Li-Ion, WinVista Business 32
/L40SX/240/240X/2*340CSE/360PE/365XD/380D/380E/380XD/380Z/390/560E/560X/2*570/2*600/600E/750Cs/755C/760CD/760EL/760XD/770E/A20p/A22p
A31/i1600/G40/R50p/R61i/S30/SL510/2*T22/4*T4x/11*T6x/6*T4x0x/6*T5x0/3*W5x0/W700/3*X2x/4*X3x/3*X4x/5*X6x/3*X6xT/10*X2xx/2*X200T/4*X30x/Z60m/3*Z61x
Comunidad en Español English Community Deutsche Community Русскоязычное Сообщество

Transport Error occurred during post-handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for ISCS L

Hi,
We are moving cube 0IC_C03 of material stocks/movements
from Dev to Quality and we are facing problem while transporting the Transfer Structure 2lis_03_BF. Other two TS moved successfully.
The transporting is failing with the below error:
Errors occurred during post-handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for ISCS L"
We tried moving couple of times , still it was failing with the same error and even we tried to activate in Quality with the activate program .It say " there is no Transfer structure to activate.".
BW system is 3.1 c with service pack 18.
Your help greatly appreciated
Thanks,
Sudharani

Hi there,
Have you checked that DataSource is activated and replicated in your R3 Quality system? Check in BW for your source system if 2LIS_03_BF is there.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Carlos

Editing base value or excise duty during Posting of Excise invoice

Hi,
System is getting greyed out and not allowing to change the base value or Excise duty values during posting of excise invoice, where as it is allowing during capturing the excise invoice. How to change this?
We require facility during posting. Is it possible?
Regards,
Sattuj

Hi,
Please maintain the Assessable Value in J1ID for the material and also maintain the condition records for your excise conditions such as BED, ECS & SHECess in FV11 and try.
Thanks & Regards,

MIRO creates a duplicate document itself during posting an invoice

Hi all,
have you ever experienced that SAP created a financial posting by itself during posting of invoice? I've found out that on certain circumstances its possible. In AP process when posting an invoice(S1 entry type) in Miro AP click on "Save-post button. They should be routed to their "inbox" however it happens that they are routed to first Miro screen. This is the moment when we know the O1entry type(entry posted outside workflow) is created by the system. Is it possible to solve it here? Or should I be more specific?
Thanks a lot for help.
regards
Jakub

Hi
You can use BADI AC_DOC_POST.. Pardon me, i dont remember the name exactly.. You can search the badis in SE18 based on this name
Ask your abaper to write the code so that when the COMMIT happens, it also updates the Z table
Other Options: BTE 1120
br, Ajay M

Problem with P45 Platinum during POST

Good day!
I have MSI P45 Platinum mainboard and from to time to time it freezes during POST with AMI bios POST code - 423C. This happens right after the message that "4096MB OK" and before the detection of SATA/IDE drives. When this happens, the only way to make the system run is to turn off the power (pressing Ctrl-Alt-Del of Reset would result in the same error) - after that the POST procedure finishes correctly and I don't experience any problems afterwards (system is rock-solid after POST completion).
So my question is - can anyone explain me what does this post code mean (D-Leds are not much of a help)? Is this a mobo problem or may be there is some kind of incompatibility with my hardware. I should mention also that I've tried all versions of Bios both official and beta without any success.
This problem does not trouble me that much (doesn't happen often), but still I would like to understand what may cause it.
P.S. My system config - iC2D E8300/MSI P45 Platinum/4x1Gb DDR2-800 Geil Black Dragon (5-5-5-15)/MSI Radeon 4870 1Gb OC edition/HDD 250 Gb WD + 120Gb Seagate/SB Audigy 4/DVD-RW Asus 1814/PSU TT Toughpower 700w (w0105)
Thanx in advance and please excuse my poor English

Thank you for the reply!
Quote from: Jack the Newbie on 16-December-08, 06:39:42
What is your current BIOS Version?
I've recently flashed the latest beta bios version - 1,5 beta 6... but it produces the same error as did the latest official bios v1.4
Quote from: Jack the Newbie
Does the same problem occur with only one memory module installed?
I don't know actually. But thanks for pointing this out - I will test the system with one (and then with two) module(s). I've tested the modules with the memtest86+ software (the latest version, which supports P45 chipset) several times and it showed no errors. So the modules are OK and they worked without any problems with my previous mb (Gigabyte P35-DS3).
Quote from: Jack the Newbie
What do the POST-Status LEDs of the board tell you, when the system freezes at the described stage?
Well, I guess I don't fully understand what does the combination of LEDs tell during the freeze. I'll try to describe the combination -
LED12 - OFF LED13 - GREEN
LED8 - RED LED7 - OFF
LED14 - OFF LED10 - GREEN
LED15 - RED LED11 - OFF
In mobo's manual this diagnostic LEDs are grouped in 4 groups and the description of the group that most closely resembles my case is - "Testing base and Extended memory etc." But I'm not sure that I'm identifying the problem correctly, because of the LEDs that are OFF.
Quote from: Jack the Newbie
Are you experiencing any freeze and/or stability problems appart from the described problem?
No, as I said in my initial post, once it get past this stage everything is running smoothly - OS boots and all software, including the most demanding games or tests, are running OK.

Slow start up and no Apple logo during post

Greetings everyone and Happy Holidays.
My question deals with my son's mini which is configured slightly different than mine. His has 256mb ram, no super drive, he has the 1.42 cpu and 80gig HD.
The problem is slow start up / post speed and slow overall system performance compared to my mini and my grandson's mini. My grandson's mini is exactly the same configuration as my son's and they are networked at home and have a broadband cable connection to the net.
We didn't realize the difference in start up methods between our minis until recently when I restarted my son's system and noticed a screen filled with text scrolling down as the mini started up. I asked if this just started happening and he said it did it from the day he first started it up. Then I noticed there was no Apple logo like the other two mini's has during post.
We compared settings between my grandson's mini and my son's system but didn't really find much. We tried reinstalling 10.4 with no change. We looked at the system resources and didn't really see much other than the system showed only having about 4 mb ram free. We are all running OS 10.4.3 with all the recent updates.
It takes a good 2 minutes for this thing to boot compare to our mini's taking about 45 seconds. I didn't look at start up items in his ACCOUNTS area and I'm not currently at his computer. Thanks for any help you can give.
We LOVE our mini's and I'm sorry I put up with MS for all these years. Apple truely does have a well designed, well built, reliable product.
Thanks,
Kenny G

Hi again.
Thank you all for your replies. I will be talking to my son shortly and will pass - on your info.
Upon returning to this forum to see the replies I got to my question, I reviewed my original post and it seems a bit confusing so, I'll summarize with more clarity.
Me, my eldest son and his son (my grandson), all have mini's. I bought my son his mini first (1). Then about 3 months later I bought my grandson his mini (2). Finaly, about 3 weeks ago, I bought mine (3).
Now, my son and my grandson have pretty much the exact same mini and they are configured like this:
CPU = 1.42gig
RAM = 256mb
HD = 80gig
WiFi = not installed
Bluetooth = not installed
DVD/CD = combo drive
OS ver = 10.4.3 Tiger
Both of these are networked in my son's house.
My grandson's mini (2) runs much faster AND (this is what concerns me with my son's mini (1)) the boot sequence does NOT show anything on the screen until the Apple logo appears then contiues to boot to his login screen - all taking about 45 seconds. This appears to be a normal (good) boot sequence, which is the exact same method that MY mini goes through at boot.
NOW - My son's mini boots very slow and what concerns me with his mini is that the system boots showing text such as what you would see when a DOS system boots, batch files running and such. All this text scrolling up the screen certainly does not show one my grandson's mini nor mine.
I did the reinstall of Tiger 10.4 but I did NOT do a clean install.
So, mini (1) boots and runs slow, showing a bunch of stuff on the screen during boot. Mini (2), which is the exact same mini, boots fast and runs almost as fast as my mini.
Anyway, I hope this helps clear up my problem and will be awaiting any further info. Thank's
Kenny G

Errors occurred during post-handling PRGN_AFTER_IMP_ACTGROUP_ACGR for ACGR

Hi,
I have to import composite role from development to QAS system.I have generated profile for each role in developemnt & create transport of composite role & moved it in QAS.But in QAS it finished with Return code 8 & I found profiles are not moved in QAS for all single roles.
Error is as follows.
Errors occurred during post-handling PRGN_AFTER_IMP_ACTGROUP_ACGR for ACGR L
The errors affect the following components:
BC-SEC-USR-PFC (Authorization and Role Management)
Please advice if anybody faced such kind of issue.
Regards
Santosh

Rephrased a'la Julius:
> To avoid the problems during the subsequent import into a target client, the AGR_NUM_2 table can be maintained as customizing for the clients (plural) in the source development system where the roles are maintained. If more than one client is used for role development, a number range gap of 50000 between the clients should be sufficient to prevent profile name collisions (otherwise you have much bigger problems anyway...).
>
> This is because the system ID (sy-sysid) is used as an attribute in the generated profile's name, but not the client (sy-mandt). > The value set in the AGR_NUM_2 tables determines the current number per client of the next sequential number to be used for profile generation. The customer can initialize this number to insert an additional attribute per client to achieve unique generated names within client specified ranges.
Something like that
Cheers,
Julius

Lockup during POST

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for