Logic 10.0.2 Bypass Bug For Multi Output Instruments

It appears the 10.0.2 update causes Logic to crash when bypassing multi-output Instruments.
-SD

The current 10.0.3 release appears to have corrected this issue. Thanks Logic team for the fast fix.
-SD

Similar Messages

Using iDrum as a multi-output instrument

Hi all-
Maybe someone else uses iDrum as a drum sequencer/scratch drum instrument like me.
I can't seem to instantiate iDrum as a multi output instrument...only stereo.
I know how to do this well in PT, but it has eluded me so far in L8.
I am:
Creating a new instrument track, selectin the i/o as iDrum and there is no multi output option as there is in ultrabeat.
It is probably something simple...usually is
any help appreciated greatly!!

AFAIK, there is no multi-output support for iDrum with Logic 8, although you could select a multi-channel option in LP7.
What you can do is bounce pattern/song to separate .aiff files from the iDrum menu and reimport them on to audio tracks.

Multi Output instruments - can you add tracks after creation ?

Hi all, I did some reading and I tested and understand how it works.
First you create a multi timbral instrument - select how many tracks you want to use (this is my problem), then assign relevant outs within the instrument if necessary and create Aux tracks to be able to manage/edit the tracks individually in Logic instead of the soft instrument. Cool, I get that, that works.
The problem I have is, thats not how I work. My Arrange page always starts with 1 track and I add relevant tracks as I go along. I couldn't tell you in advance how many ESX24 instances I will need and the same for any other synth. What I don't want to do is create 8 multi timbral Kontakt tracks, for example, because the unused tracks will be taking up space on the Arrange page and I may well never use them. I can't work out how to add multi timbral tracks to already existing multi timbral instruments. I seem to end up with a duplicate of the original multi timbral instrumetn - not an independent track. If I have to load a new instance then fine, but I just need confirmation of what I am doing being correct or wrong.
Cheers

Hi
2 ways (or more) you could deal with this:
A) Create all the Multi-Timbral tracks you might need, and Hide all but the first channel. When you need more, un-hide those required.
B) When you create a 'normal' Instrument Channel, Logic normally assigns it to receive ALL MIDI channels. Using the Arrange:Track:New with Next MIDI Channel will create a 'dupicate' assigned to MIDI Ch 1, then 2 the next time you use the function
For 'correct' multi-timbral operation, you do not want the "ALL" channel.
The simplest way to deal with this (if I have understood your needs), is to create the first "instance" using the New Tracks:Multi-Timbral, but with only 1 Multi T part. This creates a strip with the MIDI Input already set to Ch 1.
To create new "sub-tracks', select the 1st one, and use the Track:Create with Next MIDI Channel function.
The catch is that you MUST select the track assigned to the highest MIDI ch for that instrument, or you will have to manually adjust the channel of the new instance in the Track Prameters box in the Inspector.
HTH
CCT

Recording Multi Output Instruments

Here is what I want to do: To route the separate outputs of my Multi Instrument to audio channels for recording, in this case I'm using NI's Battery 3, but the same applies to Ultrabeat and the EXS24.
In PT this is very easy to do, since the outputs of any multi channel instrument can be set as inputs on any Audio Channel, you then simply hit arm and record, job done.
However in Logic the only way I have so far found to do this is to send the outputs to AUX channels, then set the output of each AUX to a BUS, then set those BUS's as inputs on the AUDIO channels for recording. Now Logic automatically creates a BUS for each AUX channel, so unless you go into the environment and create the channels, for each output from the multi instrument, you get 2 x AUX, 2 x BUS and 1 x AUDIO and you end up with a massive mix window!
So if anyone has any ideas, other then to solo and bounce out individually. However I suspect this is a routing issue with Logic and there's never going to be a solution other then to use PT.

Hi
2 ways (or more) you could deal with this:
A) Create all the Multi-Timbral tracks you might need, and Hide all but the first channel. When you need more, un-hide those required.
B) When you create a 'normal' Instrument Channel, Logic normally assigns it to receive ALL MIDI channels. Using the Arrange:Track:New with Next MIDI Channel will create a 'dupicate' assigned to MIDI Ch 1, then 2 the next time you use the function
For 'correct' multi-timbral operation, you do not want the "ALL" channel.
The simplest way to deal with this (if I have understood your needs), is to create the first "instance" using the New Tracks:Multi-Timbral, but with only 1 Multi T part. This creates a strip with the MIDI Input already set to Ch 1.
To create new "sub-tracks', select the 1st one, and use the Track:Create with Next MIDI Channel function.
The catch is that you MUST select the track assigned to the highest MIDI ch for that instrument, or you will have to manually adjust the channel of the new instance in the Track Prameters box in the Inspector.
HTH
CCT

Can you generate separate audio tracks from a Multi-Output Instrument?

Is there a way to use the "export all tracks as audio files" function and have the multi-output assignments generate separate audio tracks? There doesn't appear to be a way to do this.
Ideas?

I think you'll need to bounce them out, or record them via busses...

Can't freeze tracks on "multi output" instruments?

Hi folks,
Just noticed that freezing tracks on "multi output" instances of instruments (Ultrabeat, EX24) is not an option. Am I missing something here?
Thanks!

No, you're not missing anything, freeze doesn't work on Multi-out instruments.

Counter using PCI-6602 for multi output

Hi guys,
currently I tried to control a linearmotor using PCI-6052E and PCI-6602.
The questions is, how to use PCI-6602 to be a counter which will be converted to several output (multioutput):
(1) converted to position >> 1count = ...[mm] --> position measurement
(2) converted to voltage >> 1count = ...[mV] or [V] --> voltage measurement
(3) converted to current >> 1count = ...[mA] or [A] --> current measurement
(4) converted to velocity >> 1count = ...[mm/s] --> velocity measurement
(5) converted to acceleration >> 1count = ...[mm/s^2] --> acceleration measurement
(6) converted to force >> 1count = ...[N] or [kg.mm/s^2] --> force/load measurement
(7) converted to frequency >> 1count=...[Hz] --> frequency measurement
(i) Please assist me how to connect the driver's encoder (Ch. A A/ B B/ Z Z/) with PCI-6602, so I can get all informations above (7 measurements). What/which port of PCI-6602 connect to where from the driver.
(ii) Please assist me how to connect the feedback signal to the PC. What/which port of PCI-6602 connect to PC.
(iii) How to test those 7 measurements above using Measuremant and Automation Explorer (MAX) ver.4.4.1?
Thank you for your kindly help and assistance.
Best wishes,
hendro

Dear Jochen,
(1) Principally, I'd like to use PCI-6602 to be a motion encoder also be a counter (Is it possible? Due to the manual, it is possible). I expect to have all information, such as position, time, velocity, etc. from that motion encoder (or at least the position and time). It is also expected of using PCI-6602 to do all measurements that I mentioned before . My meaning is, after having a signal from the counter, that 'count' will be converted to desire units under other programs. So, in this case, PCI-6602 is only used to get the 'count'.
Simplified, the voltage command will send to the system (linear motor) through PCI-6052E (-10V to 10V). The actual position or other actual information will be catched (read) by using PCI-6602 (as a motion encoder, also as a counter). Then, this actual position will be used as a feedback, that will be compared to desired position.
Is that also possible to use PCI-6602 be a motion controller + a counter + a frequency measurement in a same time parallely?
I don't decide yet (I don't know) which acquisition rate will be needed/required, higher is better.
(2) I'd like to apply an adaptive robust controller (yes, it is a closed loop system) under matlab with their feature called Real-Time-Workshop instead of using LV.
(3) Power drive for the linear system will be driven by AC servo drive.
Thanks for your help before,
Warmly regards,
hendro

Multi-Output FAIL

I am a fan of multi-outputting all my plug-ins to economize on my RAM and CPU resources. I moved from Cubase to Logic 3 years ago, but am now contemplating going back to Cubase because Logic Pro hasn't really solved the Multi-output thing yet, and has become a huge drain on my workflow when working with 50+ tracks.
1) When creating aux tracks in the Mixer to correspond with the Multi-output tracks in the arrange page, they always get scramble when leaving the Mixer window. So when you are, for example, done editing in the Piano Roll and go back to the Mixer, you are lost as to where you track is amongs the 50 tracks there. However, when you click on "Arrange" it does put them back in order, but you cannot then go view another window without them scrambling again.
2) You have to rename all your tracks. Even if I name the tracks in the arrange window, the corresponding tracks in the Mixer window remain unamed, so you have to go back and forth to name all your tracks. Now top that off with that the tracks get scrambled everytime you leave the Mixer window and you are looking at a long, tough job just to get organized.
Anybody out there recognize my troubles here? Anyone know if there is a fix to this or perhaps the next Logic update will solve this? Can anyone forward this to the programmers at Logic and suggest to put it on their next "to do" list?
Thanks,
Alexander
PS: also, being able to export audio to movie in 64-bit should be on a list as well

Nope, no workaround, because if you assign the aux channel to a track, it's not a MIDI track.
So in this case, with extra outputs, there is no direct connotation between a part on MIDI channel 3, and an auxilliary output that that part is on (which could be any of them).
If you want to have a dedicated single channel strip, the solution is easy - don't use the EXS24 in multioutput mode, use multiple instances with the same sample set loaded (they share RAM so the samples are only loaded once). Hey presto, a dedicated channel for each part.

Need help with creating multi out instruments...

What do I do wrong here… I tried to figure this out already since at least 1 year. I am desperate!
Here is what I do while trying to make a multi output instrument in logic studio 9:
1:I create 1 software instrument:
2: I choose a multi output stereo AU Instrument:
3: I load 5 software instruments, each on its own channel, all in the same Logic Instrument:
4: In the mixer, I created 5 Aux channels by clicking on the + sign of the Instrument:
5: In the arrange window, I create 5 new channels from the Track menu with New with Next Midi Channel:
Now when playing the 1st instrument track, still the sound goes directly to the output 1/2, the Aux sliders don't have any control over the volume. What do I do wrong?
Hope to find some help,
André

Hi
Depending on which version of Kontakt you are using, there are some "automated" ways of creating additional outputs, and assigning each sound to a different output:
Pic show Kontakt 4
Once you have done that, and (in Logic) loaded a Multi-Out instance of Kontakt, all you have to do is create the additional Aux channels in the mixer (using the small +) at the bottom of the Instrument Channel Strip).
CCT

[svn:bz-trunk] 9838: Bug: BLZ-416 - Can bypass checks for which channel and protocol a destination can be called over by using NetConnection instead of BlazeDS messaging .

Revision: 9838
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-08-31 11:27:50 -0700 (Mon, 31 Aug 2009)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-416 - Can bypass checks for which channel and protocol a destination can be called over by using NetConnection instead of BlazeDS messaging.
QA: Yes
Doc: Yes - note the new enforce-endpoint-validation setting.
Details: Added the following config setting:
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-416
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/config/ConfigurationConstants.java
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/MessageBroker.java
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/MessagingConfiguration.java
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/ServerConfigurationParser.java
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/SystemSettings.java

Mkfs: bad value for nbpi: must be at least 1048576 for multi-terabyte, nbpi

Hi, guys!
*1. I have a big FS (8 TB) on UFS which contains a lot of small files ~ 64B-1MB.*
-bash-3.00# df -h /mnt
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0
8.0T 4.3T 3,7T 54% /mnt
*2. But today I noticed in dmesg such errors: "ufs: [ID 682040 kern.notice] NOTICE: /mnt: out of inodes"*
-bash-3.00# df -i /mnt
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0
8753024 8753020 4 100% /mnt
*3. So, I decided to make file system with new parameters:*
-bash-3.00# mkfs -m /dev/rdsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0
mkfs -F ufs -o nsect=128,ntrack=48,bsize=8192,fragsize=8192,cgsize=143,free=1,rps=1,nbpi=997778,opt=t,apc=0,gap=0,nrpos=1,maxcontig=128,mtb=y /dev/rdsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0 17165172656
-bash-3.00#
-bash-3.00# mkfs -F ufs -o nsect=128,ntrack=48,bsize=8192,fragsize=1024,cgsize=143,free=1,rps=1,nbpi=512,opt=t,apc=0,gap=0,nrpos=1,maxcontig=128,mtb=f /dev/rdsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0 17165172656
*3. I've got some warnings about inodes threshold:*
-bash-3.00# mkfs -F ufs -o nsect=128,ntrack=48,bsize=8192,fragsize=1024,cgsize=143,free=1,rps=1,nbpi=512,opt=t,apc=0,gap=0,nrpos=1,maxcontig=128,mtb=n /dev/rdsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0 17165172656
mkfs: bad value for nbpi: must be at least 1048576 for multi-terabyte, nbpi reset to default 1048576
Warning: 2128 sector(s) in last cylinder unallocated
/dev/rdsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0: 17165172656 sectors in 2793811 cylinders of 48 tracks, 128 sectors
8381432.0MB in 19538 cyl groups (143 c/g, 429.00MB/g, 448 i/g)
super-block backups (for fsck -F ufs -o b=#) at:
32, 878752, 1757472, 2636192, 3514912, 4393632, 5272352, 6151072, 7029792,
7908512,
Initializing cylinder groups:
super-block backups for last 10 cylinder groups at:
17157145632, 17158024352, 17158903072, 17159781792, 17160660512, 17161539232,
17162417952, 17163296672, 17164175392, 17165054112
*4.And my inodes number didn't change:*
-bash-3.00# df -i /mnt
Filesystem Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c10t600000E00D000000000201A400020000d0s0
8753024 4 8753020 1% /mnt
I found http://wesunsolve.net/bugid.php/id/6595253 that is a bug of mkfs without workaround. Is ZFS what I need now?

Well, to fix the bug you referred to you can apply patch 141444-01 or 141445-01.
However that bug is just regarding an irrelevant error message from mkfs, it will not fix your problem as such.
It seems to me like the minimum value for nbpi on a multi-terabyte filesystem is 1048576, hence you won't be able to create a filesystem with more inodes.
The things to try would be to either create two UFS filesystems, or go with ZFS, which is the future anyway ;-)
.7/M.

Logic 9 - EXS24 Multi Output not working correctly?

Ok, another EXS24 query from me.
I have a software instrument track with a multi output EXS24 inserted, I go into the edit panel and assign the output of the kick, snare etc to one of the auxes available. I create an aux track for each of these from the original software track (hitting the + button) and everything is ready to go.
What is then happening here is that the audio is routed correctly and being played back via each aux track, then it randomly plays each track back out through the main stereo output.
Is anyone else experiencing this?
Also whilst on the subject of the sampler. I recall that there was some option on Logic 8 to view which samples were being played from the sampler. When the midi note was triggered in the sequencer or by pressing a midi note on a keyboard the sample name would be highlighted, which was quite handy for instruments with lots of samples. Does anyone know how to turn this on in Logic 9?
Cheers
Bryan

bump!

Personnel cost plan (PCP) run for multi years period

There is a requirement of PCP run (tcode PHCPADMN) for multi years.
So, I create a plan, for example, from: 01.01.2010 - 31.12.2014.
There is a position SPV1 has Infotype 5010 from 01.01.2010 - 31.12.2010, for example the value is 150 USD/month.
This position is described by a job, SPV.
The job SPV itslef has Infotype 5010 from 01.01.2010 - 31.12.9999, for example the value is 100 USD/month.
When I run the PCP, the result is:
SPV has value 150 USD from 01.01.2010 - 31.12.2010.
SPV has value 0 USD from 01.01.2011 - 31.12.2014 (it is incorrect)
What I expect is:
SPV has value 150 USD from 01.01.2010 - 31.12.2010
SPV has value 100 USD from 01.01.2011 - 31.12.2014 (getting data from job because position cost does not exist).
If I try to run on yearly basis, not multi year, the result is correct.
2010:
SPV has value 150 USD from 01.01.2010 - 31.12.2010.
2011-2014:
SPV has value 100 USD from 01.01.2011 - 31.12.2014 (getting data from job because position cost does not exist).
it seems that SAP only consider, along the run period, if position has value it will takes from position, otherwise it will takes from job.
Is it normally like this or a bug?
Additional question: Do you have any comment about PCP run for multi years?
Thanks for all advise.

Hi,
you have to run your object data selection for multi years as well. First do this for the person, tha n do it for the position, than for the job. Than you can delete the data from the position and automatically the data from the job is taken (in average) for the position for the period you select.
A thing that you have to keep in mind for multi period runs is that it creates thousands and thousand of records. Runtime is therefore long and extraction to BW is also hard to create due to this. If it is possible to cut it in to pieces, this is advisable.
regards,
Frans

RMX in Logic 8 as multi-timbral or multi-output?

Hi:
I downloaded the latest RMX for Logic 8. ( I've used RMX in Logic 7 a lot).
But, I'm not sure how to use it. If I open RMX as a multi-TIMBRAL instrument, 8 tracks show up in my arrange window, but they don't seem linked to RMX like in Logic 7 (e.g. midi tracks). Parts aren't ruted to them, and messing wif the RMX mixer doesn't seem to help.
And, if I open RMX as a multi-OUTPUT and set up some auxes with the + button, RMX channels 2-8 don't play through the auxes. It's as if they are not there. And there's no additional channels in the track windows, so I can't see regions for each part.
Ideally, I'd like 8 tracks in the arrange window for working with regions, and 8 channels in the track mixer for processing (although I'm OK just processing within RMX if necessary).
Can someone tell me the proper way to set up RMX in Logic 8? What have I missed (hoping not to open environment and relive the **** of setting up RMX in L7).
Thanks!!

Thanks for sticking with me Christian. I'm still messing with it. Still no luck. I've created multi in environment (followed video). Created multi in arrange, clicked + in mixer. I get a lot of things that look like RMX. So far:
- I can't get a master track in arrange or mixer, I can't get midi tracks in arrange, and I can't get RMX channels to distribute. It's screwed.
Would you mind telling me the steps you took? I must be doing something wrong.
BTW, yes I do have 1.6.1.

%HWIC_HOST-1-RX_CRC_ERROR: HWIC_HOST: Host termination logic experienced an HWIC CRC error for Interface

Hi,
we observe errors logs on the router as below ,please check and update if its trouble issue or abnormal behavior as we dont see any Services interuppted in the router currently.
Jun 17 06:18:57.208: %HWIC_HOST-1-RX_CRC_ERROR: HWIC_HOST: Host termination logic experienced an HWIC CRC error for Interface Descriptor Block 0x30A5F9A0
Jun 17 06:19:08.632: %HWIC_HOST-1-RX_CRC_ERROR: HWIC_HOST: Host termination logic experienced an HWIC CRC error for Interface Descriptor Block 0x30A5F9A0
Jun 17 06:19:09.452: %HWIC_HOST-1-RX_CRC_ERROR: HWIC_HOST: Host termination logic experienced an HWIC CRC error for Interface
LS-EMAX-LAMCY-MPLS uptime is 18 weeks, 21 hours, 38 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System restarted at 08:52:33 UTC Mon Feb 10 2014
System image file is "usbflash0:c1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M4.bin"
Last reload type: Normal Reload
LS-EMAX-LAMCY-MPLS#
NAME: "CISCO1921/K9 chassis", DESCR: "CISCO1921/K9 chassis"
PID: CISCO1921/K9 , VID: V05 , SN: FCZ1652902A
NAME: "Enhanced High Speed WAN Interface Card-1 Port Gigabit Ethernet SFP/Cu on Slot 0 SubSlot 0", DESCR: "Enhanced High Speed WAN Interface Card-1 Port Gigabit Ethernet SFP/Cu"
PID: EHWIC-1GE-SFP-CU , VID: V01, SN: FOC16486ADD

Hi,
Its indeed the bug CSCuo71154
https://tools.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuo71154/?reffering_site=dumpcr
There is no release where the bug is fixed at the moment, though there is a workaround by enabling flow control.
Thanks
"Please rate the post if found useful"

Logic 10.0.2 Bypass Bug For Multi Output Instruments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for