Logical Components and Solution Landscapes - 2 PRD ECC Servers

When I assign my PRD ECC5 server to Logical Components > SAP ECC > SAP ECC Server > SAP ECC, I select the Product Version as SAP ECC5.
From the drop down list on Production System, I can see both my ECC 5 PRD's clients listed. I select one client, all OK. Problem is I have 2 Production ECC5's, both to be used in seperate solutions. So I can only select ONE of these,
How can I use 2 ECC5 Production systems in Logical Components, or does it need to be configured differently?
Thanks,
Derek

hi Derek,
you can create more than one logical component under ECC. Just name it something like ZECC2 and the define the systems for this logical component. You can then use the logical component in your project system landscapes.
To add a new one just right click on the text SAP ECC Server and select Create Logical Component.
regards,
Jason

Similar Messages

  • Understanding and using Logical Components for Managed System configuration

    Experts.....
    I am embarking on a fresh installation of SolMan 7 EhP1 SPS25 and after a few bugs along the way, I am finally nearing the end of including the first Managed System.  Somewhat related to {forum:id=10293771] I am hoping I can get some advice, but specifically with regards to Logical Components.
    General question - I have a slide from SAP that shows a picture from Product->System->Instance->Logical System (client)->Logical Component.  I am confused because it shows that Client 100 of a given ABAP system could be assigned to Logical Component A, whereas Client 200 of the same system could be assigned to Logical Component B.  This seems wrong to me?
    I am at the last step of the managed systems configuration wizard : "create logical components" and only want to ensure that I set things up to hopefully ensure that later usages (Maintenance Optimizer, etc) will handle things correctly!!!
    - Our SAP landscape is not very complex
    1. only ERP and EP (Dev/Test/Prod). 
    2. We are utilizing HR Self Service (XSS).
    3. The ERP ABAP systems are on Netweaver 7.01. 
    4. EhP4 has been installed, however we only activated the HCM business functions.  Therefore SAP_HR is on 604 whereas SAP_APPL is on 600.  I think this might be driving some of the confusion in SMSY
    For the DEV ABAP system I am trying to configure:
    1. The system is showing up in two products : "SAP ERP" and "SAP ERP Enhancement Package" with the header data for both showing "EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01" and "SAP ERP 6.0"
    2. Under "SAP ERP" the "product instance selection" shows only "SAP NW - Adobe Docu. Service" and "SAP ECC Server" as relevant
    3. Under ""SAP ERP Enhancement Package" the "product instance selection" shows only "Human Capital Mgmt" as relevant by default.  I manually flagged the development portal system as "relevant" for "SAP XSS (Self Services)"
    4. The RCA DBA Cockpit system is complaining "No data available for extractor activation. Please check product mapping and Software Components in SMSY"
    5. In the Managed System wizard, there is no logical component for any of the "EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01" selections
    From what I can tell, I think this is correct:
    1. Create a Z_EHP4 logical component and assign the DEV/QAS/PRD systems to them
    2. Also assign the DEV/QAS/PRD to the existing SAP logical component "SAP ERP ECC SERVER"???
    3. For the Solutions, my plan is to create
    a. Non-Production ERP : with the dev/test erp/ep systems, but test system as the leading system
    b. Production ERP with the prod erp/ep systems only
    Thanks for any advice/guidance to help me avoid future problems!!
    Edited by: Eric Poellinger on Jun 15, 2011 6:32 PM

    General question - I have a slide from SAP that shows a picture from Product->System->Instance->Logical System (client)->Logical Component. I am confused because it shows that Client 100 of a given ABAP system could be assigned to Logical Component A, whereas Client 200 of the same system could be assigned to Logical Component B. This seems wrong to me?
    Client 100 could be assigned to any number of logical components, client 200 could be assigned to those same ones or none of them. A logical component is just a grouping of systems used to accomplish some task in SolMan.
    For example with ChaRM you could have 2 logical components.
    ZCHARM_DEV development (100) -> QA (200) -> prod (300)
    ZCHARM_SEC security (900) -> QA (200) -> prod(300)
    One is used to show the path for moving development changes to prod, the other for security changes. 200 belongs to both, but 100 only to one.
    Set them up in whatever way meets you needs. It looks like for you, you could just use the default one and assign your clients to the various system roles. Not all functionality in SolMan uses the logical components though.

  • Solution landscape is  blank in DSWP.

    Our tech. person configure the Solman of IMG and following
    1)Configured one new solution with id,cust no,lang. etc.
    2)Maintained system land landscape in SMSY.
    3)LANDSCAPE components were --server,db,systems,system components were created.
    4)Initial data transfer to IB52 was successful.
    When we go to DSWP,Select solution,the next screen displays ,on left side
    --Solution overview,operation setup,operations Buttons.
    But on right side nothing appears except blank white screen.
    Why items like solution land landscape,solution monitoring or
    service desk tabs or for that matter no Tabs appears.
    What is missing
    any ideas pl.?

    Hey there Ragh,
      You need to go into the Solution Landscape Maintenace and 'activate' the respective systems befoe they will show-up in the overall map (assuming that you have both assigned logical components to your landscape already and activated monitoring as per the manual for Solution Manager).
      In your landscape view - goto Operations Setup, then Solution Landscape Maintenance.  In the matrix of systems that are in the Landscape view, highlight the respective systems that you want monitored in the environment and hit the 'System' button (the one with the red and green ball in it).  The system icon should go green and now that system will show in your Solution Landscape.
      Question why this occured?  You probably choose Poduction as the lead role and didn't have a production system in the logical component that you assigned.
      Let me know if that helped with your problem.  If you don't have any systems to 'activate' then this is another issue all together.

  • Landscape Management and logical components

    Hi
    Can anyone please help me to fix the issue related to sap solution manager Landscape Management and logical components.
    Actually here we have “Some software component versions are not covered by product instances” but it should be “All software components are covered by product instance”. Is it makes any problem while we do maintenance optimizer
    Document attached for reference...
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Kranthi.

    Hi Kranthi,
    As mentioned by Daniel, after executing the Landscape verification, it will show all the missing product version and product instance. so just add it, it will add and show in LMDB.
    In below screen of LMDB show all the product version and product instance add and automatically captured. not able to add the product version manually due to refresh job. all the related product details shown in Landscape verification.
    After addition will able to find all the product in the LMDB and generate the MOPZ directly from LMDB with respective product version.
    Rg,
    Karthik

  • Logical components for ERP and ERP EnhP 3

    Hello,
    We have a landscape or ECC 6.0 Systems created in the SMSY.  Those systems were linked to a new logical component Z_ERP60 under product ERP 6.0.  Then  we used that logical component in all the projects.
    Later on, we upgrade ECC 6.0 to EnhP 3.  So, we went to the SMSY transaction, to the infrastructure components--systems and add new product versions to the existent system.
    However, the logical component is defined as valid only for the original product ERP 6.0, and not to the new ERP 6.0 EhP3.  When we go to SOLAR01 transaction we still see that processes from BPR that belongs to EhP3 are greyed. 
    We want to know which is the best practice to handle this request, whether we create a new logical component associated to the product ehp3, Z_ERP60_EHP and then replace all the projects with the new component, or is there any other alternative.
    I appreciate your inputs.
    Regards
    Esteban Hartzstein

    Many thanks for your answer.  The attachment is related to whether ERP EhP is available as a product in Solution Manager.  We are in SolMan EhP1 (SP 18), so we already have the product available.  However my concern is that we need to redefine the logical component.  Logical component belongs to one single product, being ERP 6.0 or ERP 6.0 EhP.   So, in our case we need to create a new logical component with the new ERP 6.0 EhP and then re-atach all the individual systems to the new logical compoent.  Then we need to replace in all the projects withe the new logical component.  Is there any alternative to deal with this problem of redefintion of logical components??
    Regards
    ESteban Hartzstein

  • Install both SAP ECC 6.0 EHP 4 and Solution Manager in C drive

    Hi, SDN fellows.
    I just want to confirm this.
    I am trying to install SAP ECC 6.0 EHP 4 and Solution Manager in C drive. Are these OK, since they both will be installed under the C:\usr folder?
    What precaution we need to install these two SAP components in the same drive (C)?
    I am installing both components in MS Window Server 2008 R2 SP1 with MS SQL Server 2005 SP3.
    Thanks,
    KC

    Hi, Nick.
    Sorry, I missed the "IDES". I am installing SAP ECC6.0 EHP4 IDES system for training purpose within the organization.
    I am referring to the Installation Guide - SAP ERP 6.0 EHP Ready ABAP on Window MS SQL Server (Based on NW 7.0 incl EHP 1). All downloaded installation files are from: EHP4 for SAP ERP 6.0/NW7.01 --> IDES --> --> Widnows Server --> MS SQL Server.
    The OS is installed in C drive.
    I have allocated 250GB in C drive and 200GB in D drive from SAN.
    For IDES system (I know it is similar to the standard ECC), is it also recommended to install in D drive (separate from the OS)?
    In this case, should I install both Solution Manger and IDES in D drive?
    Or what is the best combination where I should install these two systems?
    Thanks,
    KC

  • SOLAR_MIGRATION and logical components: what's the behaviour

    Hi All,
    We have a Solution Manager Dev box and want to transport the contents of our project to Prod using Solar_Migration.
    In dev we had created logical components. However, Basis team has already created same logical components in Prod it now seems with proper systems linked to these.
    Will SOLAR_MIGRATION transport overwrite the logical components in PROD?
    Will it just transport the logical components, or alse the linked systems defined in SMSY?
    If SOLAR_MIGRATION also transports the systems defined in SMSY, will it overwrite similarly named systems in PROD?
    If we have differently named logical components in DEV, will they simply get added to the list of logical components in PROD.
    Thanks gurus,
    Jurjen

    Will SOLAR_MIGRATION transport overwrite the logical components in PROD?
    ...Change the names just to be sure.
    Will it just transport the logical components, or also the linked systems defined in SMSY?
    ...Yes also the linked systems
    If SOLAR_MIGRATION also transports the systems defined in SMSY, will it overwrite similarly named systems in PROD?
    ...NO, they get appended to the list
    If we have differently named logical components in DEV, will they simply get added to the list of logical components in PROD.
    ...Yes, they get appended.
    Jurjen

  • Authorization for Work center, logical links and components

    Hi Gurus,
    Can authorization be given to Work centers, logical links and components.
    Thanks,
    Sarat.

    It can be done using Authorization object UIU_COMP. it has 3 fields :
    Component Name
    Component Window Name
    Inbound Plug
    Note : You can maintain authorizations based on components, WC pages, Direct links groups and direct links but not on views.
    Authorization object for direct links : C_LL_TGT which has 2 field : Logical Link Type and Link Parameter
    Hope this helps,
    Cenk Sezgin

  • Problems with Logical Components

    Hi All,
    I am having problems with Logical Components with our project. We are implemeents SAP HCM and we have defined a logical component Z_ERP for the ECC server. now when you look at the transaction from SOLAR02 it seems they also have a logical Component SAP Learning Solution that is assigned to them. what could be the cause of this???

    Hi Trevor,
    If you brought them in from the Business Process Repository, the logical component is going to be the default one. If you want to use your own, you need to replace the default one with yours.
    You can do this in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN by going to the System Landscape tab > Systems tab > highlight the SAP Learning Solution logical component row > press F4 > replace it with Z_ERP.
    If for some reason SAP Learning Solution isn't listed as a logical component you may have to add it, you can also just go to SOLAR02 > Edit > Replace Log. Comp > Enter SAP Learning Solution in the top box and Z_ERP in the bottom one > click Save.
    regards,
    Jason

  • ChaRM:Logical Components for Projects

    Hi Experts,
    I have done ChaRM config and i am about to create logical components for the project Project.
    I have below two questions please help.
    While creating a logical component when i have multiple clients in DEV, QAS and PRD how to proceed and second question is about RFC Users in satellite systems.
    1) My ECC landscape have DEV ->100, 200, 300, 400, QAS-> 100, 200, 300, PRD-> 100, 200 with multiple clients.
    So while creating logical component do i need mention all clients in the logical component or its enough if i mention DEV->100, QAS->100, PRD->100 ?
    If i mention only one client in logical component how transports will move to other clients in DEV, QAS and PRD. Please help.
    2) Second question is do we need to create READ, TMW, back rfc users in all clients for DEV, QAS and PRD for above ECC landscape ?
    Please help for above question.
    Regards
    Latha

    Hi,
    So while creating logical component do i need mention all clients in the logical component or its enough if i mention DEV->100, QAS->100, PRD->100 ?
    Yes, you can have this TMS track defined and use SCC1  for performing imports within the system (like QAS 100 to QAS 200 ). Or use the Tranport Target Group option so that your TR is visible in import queue of all system. More info Extended Transport Control (SAP Library - BC Change and Transport Organizer)
    2) Second question is do we need to create READ, TMW, back rfc users in all clients for DEV, QAS and PRD for above ECC landscape ?
    Yes, you need RFCs b/w your working client (100 ) and 000 client of domain controller. Not for all clients.
    Regards,
    Vivek

  • Logical components problem when checking project

    Hello,
    I have searched in the forum for a solution, but the people who had the same kind of problem managed to solve it with means that do not work for me.
    Here is the situation :
    - We have a three tier landscape, DEV-QAS-PRD, in transport domain DOMAIN_A, with domain controller DCA
    - We have our Solution Manager system, DCB, which is part of (and domain controller of) transport domain DOMAIN_B
    - The two transport domains are linked, as specified in SolMan prerequisites for managing systems from other transport domains. This has been tested, and transports can be forwarded and imported freely from one domain to another.
    - I have created the systems, RFC destinations, and logical component for the three tier landscape in SolMan system DCB. The RFCs are all OK.
    - I have created the domain controller DCA system in SolMan DCB, with RFC destination to client 0, as defined in the prerequisite for Change Request Management.
    - Finally, I have created a project in SolMan system DCB, with this logical component.
    When I try to do a Check on this project, in the Change Request management tab, I have green lights everywhere, except for the following :
    - In "Check logical components" : No consolidation system found for DEV-040 (our development system)
    - In "Check consistency of project" : Message from function module /TMWFLOW/CHECK_PRJ_CONS: No export system for PRD-020 (our production system)
    We have checked the TMS settings and transport routes, and everything looks OK.
    Any ideas on what to check/try would be welcome.
    Thanks,
    Thomas

    Hi,
    Check the status of the DC's in the track created in CBS.
    at following location.
    http://url:port/webdynpro/dispatcher/sap.com/tc.CBS.WebUI/WebUI
    There should be no Broken DC's in the track.
    If every thing is fine here and you still have problems then check by repairing the class path of the component.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Nagaraju Donikena
    Regards,
    Nagaraju Donikena

  • Cannot select Technical Usage "Learning Solution - ABAP only" on ECC Server

    Dear Gurus,
            My environment are
            a SAP ERP System(ABAP only) in SMSY with
                   Product Version = "SAP ERP 6.0"
                   Main Instance = "SAP ECC Server" (as Relevant)
                           Note When I select another Relevant for "SAP Learning Sol-Frontend"
                                       Use in logical components; action not possible (see long text)
                                       Message no. SMSY_EDIT_LANDSCAPE413
                                       ... There can only be one relevant ABAP-based main instance. ...
            Select Product Version = "EHP4 FOR SAP ERP 6.0 / NW7.01"
            and Target Stack = "SAP ERP Enhancement Package 4 on NW7.01 - SP Stack 04"
            Existing Technical Usages are
                     - Central Applications
                     - ERecruiting on ECC Server
                     - Financial Supply Chain Mgmt
                     - Human Capital Management
           But I can't add Technical Usage for "Learning Solution - ABAP only" or "HCM - Learning Solution" (The checkbox is in gray color so I can't check it)
           What am I wrong? Please advice.
    Best regards,
    Choosak

    Hi Choosak,
    Try this ,
    Go to  SMSY transaction then select your system .
    In right side you will get the screen where all usage types are defined for your system.
    Select learning solution and HCM and save it.
    Go back to your solution and see whether you can see Learning solution after that.
    Thanks,
    Gerard

  • SolMan 4.0: SMSY: Delete unwanted landscape from Solution Landscapes

    Hello there everyone,
    Previously, my colleague and I have created a few solution landscapes in SMSY -> System Groups and Logical Components -> Solution Landscapes - Operation.
    We were experimenting as we're new to SolMan 4.0.
    Problem now is, we cannot find the button to delete off those unwanted solution landscapes. When right-click on a landscape, it only shows 'Display' or 'Change'.
    Is there anyway to delete within SMSY?
    Many, many thanks in advanced. =)
    Warmest regards,
    Eva

    Hi,
    Its simple.
    You should create a where-used list before you delete systems, servers or databases....
    1.You cannot delete an object you are editing, if you are in change mode. Go to display mode.
    Choose Landscape Components-->Other Object…
    2.Search for the landscape element to be deleted, in the possible entries help.
    3.Choose Delete.
    4.Confirm the confirmation prompt.
    The landscape element and all its uses are deleted.
    Check this link also.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm40/helpdata/en/03/07b4e75eee423aafab88354306eafc/content.htm
    Feel Free to revert Back.
    --Ragu

  • 2 Logical Components in 1 Maintenance Project

    Dear all,
    We have two system system landscapes / logical components (Dev -> Tst -> Prd) in parallel; Finance and Logistics.
    Is it possible, to have them both in one Maintenance project?
    And more important, to have them both available in the project logistics task list (/TMWFLOW/PROJ).
    How do I arrange the parallel transporting eg. for Dev_FI -> Tst_FI and Dev_LO -> Tst_LO?
    Thanks for the answers,
    jan

    Hi Jan,
    Yes it is possible to have both parallel landscapes in same maintenance tasklist. Just create 2 separate logical components with the appropriate system role assignment in SMSY transaction.
    Now assign them in the Systems Landscapes Tab in the Project. When you create the maintenance cycle for this project it will automatically generate a tasklist with these 2 landscapes.
    It will show total six systems in your tasklist. DEV1>QAS1>PRD1 and DEV2>QAS2>PRD2. Now when you assign this IBase Component in your change request, it gets linked to this maintenance cycle.
    When in Normal Correction, you will get pop-up for actions like 'Logon to System' and "create transport Request' asking which Development system you want to logon to or create transport request in.
    Hope this helps...
    Thanks,
    Kriti Bhalla

  • Meaning of defining multiple logical components in mainenance project?

    Dear friends of SolMan,
    I have a question regarding a possible functionality of ChaRM .
    In the maintenance project, defined in SOLAR_PROJECT_ADMIN, there is on the tab "system landscape" another tab "systems" where you define the logical component for which the maintenance belongs to.
    In the list for the logical components you have the possibility to define more than one logical component.
    Now my question is:
    - Why and for what am I able to define more than one logical components?
    Thanks for your help in advance.
    Best regards,
    Alex

    Alexander
    Yes it is very important part of CHARMS
    Because logical component tells you which client is dev or QA or Prd for any system
    When you activate CHARMS in your project where you have added the logical comp then system check for this logical comp ...the needed things ...like rfc or transport route etc
    You can have multiple logical comp for various systems in one project i& it s enough to support them with one maintenance cycle working ...........to support CHARMS functionality
    Hope it clarifies
    Regards
    Prakhar

Maybe you are looking for