Logical system group

Hi all,
I asked this question a few weeks ago and I am still unclear about it. I am going to connect a second ERP system to the GTS box and want to know the following.
Since the two ERP systems don't share any master data or org structures I am going to create a new logical system group for this.
What I am unclear of and I can't seem to find the answer anywhere is do I need to also create a new logical system group name for GTS also.
My gut feeling is no but I am not sure.
Thanks in advance,
Chris

Hi Chris,
No. You just need a single LSG for GTS, so that you can create local master data - for example, Customs Offices - that is not related to a feeder system.
I hope that answers your question.
Regards,
Dave

Similar Messages

No logical system group can be determined for administrative unit &1

Dear GTS gurus,
In Risk Management module when we execute the report "Analyze LTVD Request Relevance of Products" (/SAPSLL/PRE_VD_OPT_ANL_PROD) we sometimes get the error message:
No logical system group can be determined for administrative unit *******
Now I did some googling and found the following website: consolut - /SAPSLL/PRE_VDEC139 - No logical system group can be determined for administrative unit &amp;1 - /SAPSLL/…
It says that in customizing item "Define Administrative Unit Attributes" some assignment is missing but I was not able to figure out what exactly. I compared it with Administrative Units which did not not issue any error messages and customizing looks good to me.
Can you share your insights on this topic?
Best Regards
Greg

Hello Gregor,
Under the Admin Unit attributes, you must have a Plant Group defined.
Is that Plant Group assigned to a logical system ?
(IMG: General Settings -> Organizational Structure -> Define Cross-Plant evaluation (or Define Plant-based BOM evaluation)
By the way, the site you have found is one of the many sites out there that lists the messages available in a SAP system. The same information is available within GTS (Transaction SE91).
Regards.
Mouaz BEN REDJEB

Logical Systems vs Cross Systems

Dear all,
I have two physical SAP ERP systems grouped under one logical system.
Now I want to connect to a third SAP ERP system in order to execute Cross System analysis between the systems under the logical system and the new third system.
I understand that I cannot do a Cross System RA on systems of the same logical system so that´s the reason why I need to set up the third system as a single new ERP system.
Anyhow the new ERP system should use the same rule set than the two systems of the logical system.
So I´d just like to set up the new system connector for the GRC 5.3 but I do not want to load the same rules again for the new ERP system, etc.
Is this possible? I tried to create a new logical system containing the new ERP system and regenerate the rules for the logical systems. But after that no simple RA is possible for the new ERP system.
Thanks for any advice and regards,
Markus Richter

Hello Markus,
Yes, you are right that you can not include the third system in the same logical group if you wish to use it for cross-system analysis. If you choose to have this as a stand alone system in RAR then first you will have to upload the rules for this stand alone system in RAR. The rules loaded for logical system will not work for this system as it is not part of the logical system group.
Regards, Varun

Original Logical System Of Product

Hello,
I am new to GTS and am finding it difficult to find the original Logical System for a Product in GTS. I found table /SAPSLL/TCOGVA, which shows the Logical System to Logical System Group. Then there is /SAPSLL/PNTPR, which shows the Logical System Group and Product. However, I would like to know which logical systems a product was found.
Is this possible in GTS?
Thank you in advance.
Regards, Dean.

Hi,
This is allways an issue, as this information, I beleive, gets lost along the way. So there are 2 hints for you. Either you find it out via the RFC user that created the Product (for that you need a different RFC user for each System, which I woul drecommend anyway), which you will find in the general Tab of the Product master. If you need this information on a constant base, I suggest you transfer it with the material and add it into an additionnal Field.
Let me know if that helps.
Marc

Logical systems while implementing charm in solution manager

Hello Everybody,
I just wanted to know how many logical systems we need while implementing charm in solution manager 7.0. I have 3 clients in development , 3 clients in Quality and 1 client in production.
Thank you,
vikram.

Hi Vikram,
Yes, i1n ChaRM we always work with logical systems, I mean clients.
The standard is:
DEV -> QAS -> PRD
However, you can also use:
- Minimum
DEV -> PRD
- Target groups
DEV -> QAS -> PRD
- > TST
DEV -> QA1 -> QA2 -> PRD
DEV -> QA1 -> PR1
-> QA2 -> PR2
There are a lot of combination possible.
BR
Fernando

Logical System is not defined in table SMOF_ERPSH!

Hi,
When i am replicating a material group to SRM system, in SMQ2, the error message appears as 'Logical System is not defined in table SMOF_ERPSH!'.
can any one please let me know why this comes up, i have checked the SMOEAC settings, its fine and the logical system entries are already present in the tabe

Hi,
Can you verify all your settings as per note 720819?
Also under SMOEAC transaction, site attributes for your site type 'CRM' may not have any value. Please define attributes for your SRM RFC destination. Select the correct RFC destination, then click on button 'Get Values'.After doing this, table SMOF_ERPSH should be populated correctly.
Regards,
Nikhil

Logical system and business system

Hi experts, please help me with the below questions---
1) What is the diff between logical system and business system?
2)what is the difference between logical system(defined in R/3) and business system (defined in SLD) in idoc to file scenario.
3) Is it require to give the logical system name of the xi server(Which we define in idx1 port) to the 3rd party system(Application system at the FTP side) to carry out file to idoc scerario?

Hi,
Business System :
1. Business systems are logical systems, which function as senders or receivers within XI. Business systems can be SAP systems or third-party systems. Depending on the associated technical system.
2. Business Systems should be mandatory used when dealing with Idoc's and Proxies .
Business Service:
1. Business Service requires manual adding on Inbound and Outbound Interfaces, Business Systems do not.
2. Business Services are maintained across environments and so, their names cannot be changed. Business Systems names can be changed across environments by providing SLD level transport targets.
3.In the Business Services we cannot maintain the Group and Targets in SLD. For Ease in transporting your ID/Configuration objects Groups and Targets are used in SLD for Business Systems.
4.Business Service has no SLD Entries and No Assigned Products and SWCV's
Regards
Sangeetha

Logical Volume Group and Logical Partition not matching up in free space

I was dual booting Windows 7 and Mountain Lion. Through Disk Utility, I removed the Windows 7 Partition and expanded the HFS+ partition to encompass the entire hard drive. However, the Logical Volume Group does not think that I have that extra free space. The main problem is that I cannot resize my partition. I am wanting to dual boot Ubuntu with this. Any ideas? Any help is appreciated. I will post some screenshots with the details. Furthermore, here are some terminal commands I ran: /dev/disk0
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: GUID_partition_scheme *250.1 GB disk0
1: EFI 209.7 MB disk0s1
2: Apple_CoreStorage 249.2 GB disk0s2
3: Apple_Boot Recovery HD 650.0 MB disk0s3
/dev/disk1
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: Apple_HFS MAC OS X *248.9 GB disk1 Filesystem 1024-blocks Used Available Capacity iused ifree %iused Mounted on
/dev/disk1 243031288 153028624 89746664 64% 38321154 22436666 63% /
devfs 189 189 0 100% 655 0 100% /dev
map -hosts 0 0 0 100% 0 0 100% /net
map auto_home 0 0 0 100% 0 0 100% /home CoreStorage logical volume groups (1 found)
|
+-- Logical Volume Group 52A4D825-B134-4C33-AC8B-39A02BA30522
=========================================================
Name: MAC OS X
Size: 249199587328 B (249.2 GB)
Free Space: 16777216 B (16.8 MB)
|
+-< Physical Volume 6D7A0A36-1D86-4A30-8EB5-755D375369D9
| ----------------------------------------------------
| Index: 0
| Disk: disk0s2
| Status: Online
| Size: 249199587328 B (249.2 GB)
|
+-> Logical Volume Family FDC4568F-4E25-46AB-885A-CBA6287309B6
Encryption Status: Unlocked
Encryption Type: None
Conversion Status: Converting
Conversion Direction: backward
Has Encrypted Extents: Yes
Fully Secure: No
Passphrase Required: No
|
+-> Logical Volume BB2662B7-58F3-401C-B889-F264D79E68B4
Disk: disk1
Status: Online
Size (Total): 248864038912 B (248.9 GB)
Size (Converted): 130367356928 B (130.4 GB)
Revertible: Yes (unlock and decryption required)
LV Name: MAC OS X
Volume Name: MAC OS X
Content Hint: Apple_HFS

Here is another try via the command line:
dhcp-10-201-238-248:~ KyleWLawrence$ diskutil coreStorage resizeVolume BB2662B7-58F3-401C-B889-F264D79E68B4 210g
Started CoreStorage operation
Checking file system
Performing live verification
Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume
Checking extents overflow file
Checking catalog file
Incorrect block count for file 2012.12.11.asl
(It should be 390 instead of 195)
Checking multi-linked files
Checking catalog hierarchy
Checking extended attributes file
Checking volume bitmap
Checking volume information
Invalid volume free block count
(It should be 21713521 instead of 21713716)
The volume MAC OS X was found corrupt and needs to be repaired
Error: -69845: File system verify or repair failed

Multiple Logical Systems in Partner Profile for one instance

Can we create multiple Logical Systems in Partner Profile (WE20) for one instance or one System? If it is possible, can we create Logical System with respect to Plant/Country?

I am not quite sure if I understood your problem completley. But let's see...
Usually you use on on MSCS Cluster Group per SAP instance. So you have your already existing NW 7.0 ABAP stack in a separated Cluster Group, and you create a new Cluster Group for your new Java system.
You can find more information about it in this guide here on SDN:
Link: [High Availability;
More information about High Availability Setups for SAP System can be found here on SDN:
Link: [High Availability]
If you want to use the same database for your clustered ABAP stack and your new Java stack you can do a MCOD installation.
Please see Link: [SAP Note 388866 - Multiple Components on One Database - Installation|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/388866]
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Mathias

Error message when installing Yosemite OS: this core storage operation is not allowed on a sparse logical volume group

I was updating my Macbook Air (i7, 4mb RAM, 256 gb) to Yosemite OS when the process was interrupted. After retry, my computer is showing the following message: "this core storage operation is not allowed on a sparse logical volume group". I tried to restart several times, but the problem goes on with error. It would be my computer damaged?

If you don't already have a current backup of all data, back up before proceeding. There are ways to back up a computer that isn't fully functional. Ask if you need guidance.
Start up in Recovery mode. When the OS X Utilities screen appears, select Disk Utility.
In the Disk Utility window, select the icon of the startup volume from the list on the left. It will be nested below another disk icon, usually with the same name. Click the Unlock button in the toolbar. When prompted, enter the login password of a user authorized to unlock the volume, or the alternate decryption key that was generated when you activated FileVault.
Then, from the menu bar, select
File ▹ Turn Off Encryption
Enter the password again.
You can then restart as usual, if the system is working. Decryption will be completed in the background. It may take several hours, and during that time performance will be reduced.
If you can't turn off encryption in Disk Utility because the menu item is grayed out, you'll have to erase the volume and then restore the data from a backup. Select the Erase tab, and then select
Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
from the Format menu.
You can then quit to be returned to the main Recovery screen. Follow these instructions if you back up with Time Machine. If you use other backup software, follow its developer's instructions.
Don't erase the volume unless you have at least two complete, independent backups. One is not enough to be safe.

Failed to revert logical volume group while merging partition

Hi All,
Previously, on my macbook pro, I partitioned my disk for win7 for my dual operation system and only left 120 GB for OS, now I want to delete win7 and return disk space to OS. Currently my OS is yosemite.
I have already deleted disk space for win7 and merged it back to disk0s3. And, I had a problem to merge disk0s2 with disk0s3.
I was told it is because I need to revet my Logical Volume Group. I am blocked at reverting it.
This is my disk info:
rescomp-14-251133:~ rico$ diskutil list; diskutil cs list
/dev/disk0
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:      GUID_partition_scheme                        *500.1 GB   disk0
   1:                        EFI EFI                     209.7 MB   disk0s1
   2:          Apple_CoreStorage                         119.3 GB   disk0s2
   3:                  Apple_HFS Recovery HD             380.6 GB   disk0s3
/dev/disk1
   #:                       TYPE NAME                    SIZE       IDENTIFIER
   0:                  Apple_HFS Macintosh HD           *119.0 GB   disk1
                                 Logical Volume on disk0s2
                                 CC457129-6FE9-41A0-B0D2-F547F21A7555
                                 Unencrypted
CoreStorage logical volume groups (1 found)
|
+-- Logical Volume Group F454017F-C531-43BA-B270-E2058E05BFF4
    =========================================================
    Name:         Macintosh HD
    Status:       Online
    Size:         119290187776 B (119.3 GB)
    Free Space:   4096 B (4.1 KB)
    |
    +-< Physical Volume AC7A2748-0DA1-49D6-B50C-30348838760E
    |   ----------------------------------------------------
    |   Index:    0
    |   Disk:     disk0s2
    |   Status:   Online
    |   Size:     119290187776 B (119.3 GB)
    |
    +-> Logical Volume Family 4B7E6277-69BC-475A-BBB7-7A94D6434D9E
        Encryption Status:       Unlocked
        Encryption Type:         AES-XTS
        Conversion Status:       Converting
        Conversion Direction:    -none-
        Has Encrypted Extents:   Yes
        Fully Secure:            No
        Passphrase Required:     No
        |
        +-> Logical Volume CC457129-6FE9-41A0-B0D2-F547F21A7555
            Disk:                  disk1
            Status:                Online
            Size (Total):          118954639360 B (119.0 GB)
            Conversion Progress:   -none-
            Revertible:            Yes (unlock and decryption required)
            LV Name:               Macintosh HD
            Volume Name:           Macintosh HD
            Content Hint:          Apple_HFS
when I type unlock:
rescomp-14-251133:~ rico$ diskutil corestorage unlockVolume CC457129-6FE9-41A0-B0D2-F547F21A7555 -stdinpassphrase
CC457129-6FE9-41A0-B0D2-F547F21A7555 is already unlocked and is attached as disk1
It is already unlocked
then, I tried revert it
rescomp-14-251133:~ rico$ diskutil coreStorage revert CC457129-6FE9-41A0-B0D2-F547F21A7555
Passphrase:
Started CoreStorage operation on disk1 Macintosh HD
Error: -69750: Unable to modify a FileVault context
Does anyone how I can revert it, then merge disk0s2 and disk0s3

Here is another try via the command line:
dhcp-10-201-238-248:~ KyleWLawrence$ diskutil coreStorage resizeVolume BB2662B7-58F3-401C-B889-F264D79E68B4 210g
Started CoreStorage operation
Checking file system
Performing live verification
Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume
Checking extents overflow file
Checking catalog file
Incorrect block count for file 2012.12.11.asl
(It should be 390 instead of 195)
Checking multi-linked files
Checking catalog hierarchy
Checking extended attributes file
Checking volume bitmap
Checking volume information
Invalid volume free block count
(It should be 21713521 instead of 21713716)
The volume MAC OS X was found corrupt and needs to be repaired
Error: -69845: File system verify or repair failed

3TB Fusion & logical volume group

I'm in the process of fully reinstalling Mavericks - erasing my internal drive and paring my system way down, to resolve some long lingering issues.
Disk Utility shows the recovery partition as separate (I've booted from it) - but when I went to erase the default Macintosh HD partition I was unable to repartition it as a single partition - it was grayed out - and the TYPE was/is logical volume group - where I was expecting to see GUID. All I could do at that point was ERASE... which I did - so it remains a logical volume group -
I'm unsure if, because of the Fusion drive, this is how they come from Apple - or the previous owner messed with it and trouble could loom wth this setup.
It's a Late 2012 iMac with stock 3TB Fusion Drive.
I'm in the process of reinstalling Mavericks from the Recovery (Internet recovery I'm guessing since it's taking 2 hours). I'm not near an Apple Store unfortunately though do have extended 3 year warranty.
Is it OK to leave the main Macintosh HD as "logical volume group"?????

Yes. That's the technical name for what Apple marketing refers to as a "Fusion Drive." Don't change it.

OSX Yosemite Logical Volume Group - FIX!

Hey guys,
For anyone wondering or concerned about why, when entering Disk Utility, the SSD name has been changed and you now see Macintosh HD and Macintosh HD below. The one above is listed as a Logical Volume Group with an "online" status while the one below that is your physical HDD (so normal as with previous OS's.
I must note that I do not have any recovery partition when holding option when booting (after installing straight onto Mavericks, nor when making my own bootable copy).
However, I did find a way to fix the Hard Drive name issue and revert it back to original format (I did find this fix online, and it has worked for me).
I included pictures below as well.
First one shows original Yosemite SSD name change (from Apple SSD to Macintosh HD with 18.9MB available)
Second shows your normal HHD name unchanged.
Go to Terminal and enter the following:
diskutil cs list
then you will see a bunch of volumes jump up
enter: diskutil cs revert "UUID"
under "UUID", enter the the Logical Volume code number without brackets.
Do not copy and paste it from terminal into your new terminal line. Write it out.
Hit enter and it will ask to reboot your Mac.
Once, rebooted, your old SSD/HDD name with reappear as in Mavericks.
My entire terminal line is shown in the picture attached.
Either way (SSD name changed or reverted) did not changed how the system performed. Everything is running as it should.
Final result shown in last picture!
Hopefully this is just a bug that Apple will fix.
Please ignore the DiskMaker drive (I was making a bootable copy on my external!!)

Thanks for the tip. I see its a common trouble. But i stuck a problem that cannot be solved with this method cause i dont have revertable logic volume.
SO i cannot install system now. There's no visible disk any more.

I need to sudo cs delete an encrypted hard drive but get an error "Not a valid CoreStorage Logical Volume Group UUID"

Ok so I encrypted an internal HDD with DOE compliant encryption, and forgot the password. I am not using a typical mac bootloader so apple C when its booting will not work to delete it before its mounted. I have to do it through the terminal. The drive I want to delete is HDD2. Here is the screen capture of running diskutil cs list in terminal.
Then I disconnected everything to avoid problems, leaving my encrypted HDD only, copied the UUID, it's in this format:
diskutil cs delete XXXXXXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXXXXXXXXXX
But I am unsure which group or physical UUID I need to use, there are three associated with HDD2, logical volume group, physical volume and logical volume family. I thought before pressing enter I better ask first ... as I tried it on the physical volume first and I got the error in the title so dont want to start guessing what do to.
Thanks

Is it not good form for members to advise about using the console? Surely some members are knowledgeable enough to tell me the answer to this .... I know it's easy to bork your system up totally with the console but I'm desparate, my main drive has 1GB free!

Logical Volume Group.

My 1TB SSD main drive on my MBP Retina volume has changed to Logical Volume Group and the Partition is named Logical Partition. Now it works fine but was wondering why it has changed from Mac OS Extended (Journaled). If I want to partition the drive, it is grayed out with no options. I'm not pleased that I can't control my own drive. Any answers?

FileVault is not activated, although it was at one point. I deleted the partition and...
I believe that may have caused the problem when I attempted to load the operating system on a new partition from the drive. I deleted it and thought I reformatted it to Mac OS Extended, but I had major issues because it was locked at one point. Just recently, I restored to a TM backup which should have formatted the drive correctly but this is what I ended up with. Like I said, the option is grayed out now.
Gary

Logical system group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for