Logical system in CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS

Hi experts,
Just a very simple question : do you confirm the logical system we have to put in CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS variants are that of SRM?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
CLEAN_REQREQ_UP:
It checks whether the backend documents (namely-PR/PO/RES) have been created in the backend systems. Deletes obsolete table entries in SRM as well as updates document numbers in the Shopping Cart. You can't process the SC in SRM until this update is complete.
BBP_GET_STATUS_2:
It ensures that the information on the back-end documents is up-to-date. Retrieves the updated information from the Back-end systems (for example PO number after it was converted from a PR)
since both the reports checks and picks up data from backend system, we need to specify RFC for backend systems only.
-rgds,
Ravi

Similar Messages

Logical systems for modeldata and RFC metadata

Hi All,
I want to know how I can display the my own created logical system names under the drop-down menu when i have to select the logical system names for modeldata and rfc metadata. I don't want to them to be written instead i want them to be one of the options in the drop down menu, as we have them in the FLIGHT_LIST_INIT example found in the sample applications and examples.
Thanks in advance
Srikant

Hi,
While creating SLD for your R/3 systems give the desired name of wht u want instead of logical name.
For configuring the same refer the link below :-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/29/e0b75c2b7d40c5bfbda82e905b701c/frameset.htm
Regards,
guru

Logical system and partner profile configuration

Hi,
I have a SQL server which is defined as a Business system in my landscape. It is sending records to ECC 6.0 which makes it a JDBC to IDOC scenario (inbound IDocs)
First question is do I have to mention a logical system name for the SQL server Business system too ?
Second question is do I create a Logical system in the ECC system (BD54/SALE) for the SQL system or would it be for the client of the ECC system itslef?
Third question is do I maintain partner profile configurations in WE20 for the SQL business system or for the ECC business system?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
S

Hi Sam,
> First question is do I have to mention a logical system name for the SQL server Business system too ?
Yes, In SLD You have to specify logical system name of the SQL server business system while creating SQL system.After importing business system into Integration directory,in Adepter-Specific Identifiers you can see logical system name of SQL server business sytem which you defined in SLD.
> Second question is do I create a Logical system in the ECC system (BD54/SALE) for the SQL system or would it be for the client of the ECC system itslef?
Yes,You have to create Logical system in ECC system for SQL system(Logical system name must be with the same name as logical system name you have given in XI SLD in previous question)
> Third question is do I maintain partner profile configurations in WE20 for the SQL business system or for the ECC business system?
In WE20 You have to maintain partner profiles for SQL server Logical system
For example: If SQL server Business system name is SQLDEVBS and logical system name is SQLDEVLS
In ECC you have to create logical system as SQLDEVLS and
Partner profiles for SQLDEVLS in WE20.
Please let me know if you have any issues.
Cheers,
JAG

How to get RFC Destination and Logical System name dynamically

Hi all,
I have a RFC FM written in CRM. I need to call this FM in R/3. So, i use the syntax " Call function <func> destination <destination name>. My problem is that i need to fetch the destination name dynamically..
There is a way to do so in CRM which is as follows:
DATA: lt_siteselect TYPE TABLE OF siteselect INITIAL SIZE 0,
           ls_siteselect TYPE siteselect.
CALL FUNCTION 'SMOF0_READ_SITESELECT'
    TABLES
      to_siteselect = lt_siteselect.
READ TABLE lt_siteselect INTO ls_siteselect
         WITH KEY sitetypeid = cl_smw1_siteprovider=>c_sitetype_r3oltp.
The above piece of code returns the site and also takes care of the client you are currently working on. But the specified FM is present only in R/3..
I want to achieve the functionality fulfilled by the above code in R/3.
Kindly help.
Useful answers will be rewarded.
Thanks in advance,
Karan Merwana
I can not use FM LOG_SYSTEM_GET_RFC_DESTINATION as for that i need to provide the logical system name. And the logical system name would be different for different clients.
Message was edited by:
        Karan Merwana

For those referring this thread later, I could not find a solution to this and ultimately had to do away with hardcoding of system names based on the DEV, Q, and PROD system names.
If anyone does manage to get a workaround, please let me know.

Business System and Logical system

Hi Experts,
in SAP if we want to exchange the Data between the systems we use Logical Syestem. Why we need Logical systems basically? and Why need Business system in XI?
Thanks,
Manoj.

hi manoj,
check this link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/c817d9d2296bb2e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
regards
srinivas

Transaction Launcher Logical Systems and URLs

Hi,
I'm facing a problem with Transaction Launcher.
I've done all the settings specified here: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm60/helpdata/en/46/231befc17b5872e10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
Under section "Define Transaction Launcher Logical Systems and URLs" I've specified the values for Quality System: the ECC system is MQAS200A
By the way, when I try to access an ERP Sales Order, the transaction CRM_TL_ERP_BUS2032_DISPLAY tries to access system MSVL200A (which is the Development ECC System).
I cannot change the Logical System within the Transaction Launcher Configuration (currently it is set to ERP), since the Transaction is standard.
Does anybody know how to map the generic value ERP with the correct value MQAS200A instead of MSVL200A?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Andrea Ricci

Hi,
You cannot generalize the Logical system name, for the workaround you need to put the logical system for quality and transport it to quality and it should work and to check in dev you need to again change the log. sys to dev and save it but dont transport it. Similarly you can do for production system.
Regards,
Shobhit

Cannot find the Recv Logical system in Distribution Model

HI experts,
Im triying a Idoc to file scenario, the logical system for PI and R3 has been already created and assinged for the appropriate clients.
and i ve created the port from r3 using tcode we21 and in PI using idx1 and Idx2. The RFC destination also created for PI and R3 system.. when i created the distribution model using BD64 in R2. when i assigning message type i can give the source logical system and i cant find the Receiver logical system... Also in WE19 i cant find the receiver port (which i created in IDX1 and IDX2)..
Could u tell me how to solve this prob???
Regards
Balaji

Hii Ravi,
Thanks for your reply,
Yes i have created the port (RFC800) idx1 and give RFC destination which points the R3 system.
I have assigned the meta data to that port using tcode idx2.
And I have created port with port name "PORT800" in R3 using we21 and give the RFC destination which points the PI system
when im using the WE19... i gave source logical system as R3 Logical system and receiver logical system as PI Logical system.
now im getting error like "PORT RFC800 DOESNT EXIT IN THE THE TABLE OF PORT DISCRIPTIONS".
Regards,
Balaji
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 25, 2009 9:32 AM
Edited by: Balaji Pichaimuthu on Jul 25, 2009 9:32 AM

Logic 9.1.5 and Lion. Interface unresponsive.

I'm experiencing a very strange issue with logic 9. The interface becomes unresponsive, I can't click on any buttons in plugin windows / transport bar / mixer page.... anywhere while the project is playing. The keyboard is equally unresponsive i.e. I can't stop with space bar etc. The clicks / keystrokes are being recognised by them system as after a while, usually about 5-10 seconds, the messages get throughout to logic. If a 'stop' message get though from the keyboard or transport bar stop button, as soon as the project stops... I can see all the clicks/keystrokes in the buffer all get executed at once in a bulk dump, which can be in the hundreds of commands if I get pareticulary frustrated. This is not a problem with overloading the audio engine. My quad core mac is only showing 1 or 2 notches of activity on all cores in logics system performance meter and activity monitor shows I'm only using %10 of available CPU. The rest of the system is unaffected. Safari / Mail etc work as usual. Closing any other open apps doesn't help. It happens on my MOTU ultralite [i]and[/i] Apogee Duet. It happens at [i]any[/i] I/O buffer setting and [i]any[/i] size reasonable size project. I have one open now with 15 tracks and about 20 or so plugins, my mac should barely even register this on the performance meter.
Other users are reporting the same issues here and note the Logic 7's interface is near instantaneous on the same system.
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2396951?start=0&tstart=0
Anyone have any ideas?

I was joking... sorry for my english
anyway: I'm running a top of the line Imac, Mac Os 10.7.1 (that came preinstalled) and Logic 9.15. a full Apple rig... It's not unrealistic to expect a normal performance. IMO it's a little sub-par.
Regarding Logic, the last thing I want is they make things "simpler"... It ussually means less options. If I'd want a simpler interface and less options I'd go with protools in a breeze as it's the de facto standard and it's a lot simpler. If somebody wants even simpler things Garage Band is the way to go...not Logic. Why people don't ask for a more complex GB instead of a simpler Logic?. The program has TONS of places to improve: PDC is a mess, there are LOTS of bugs, and I can think not less than 20 real improvements. None of them makes things simpler. IMHO it has to be professional, not "simpler". Playing piano is very simple, but it takes time and effort to master it. I don't agree with this childist society thinking that everything has to be so simple that any ignorant can drive it. This is a professional tool for professionals, or it should be.
That said, I also like the new features in Lion. Problem is: I use my machine for work not for some eye candy. If that were the case I'd buy an Ipad.
regards

Logical system name vs. destination name - CUA -

Hey experts,
at the moment I´m thinking about using the CUA in our SAP environment for role distribution.
In this scenario I need destinations to the child systems (of course!). In all manuals I found it say, that i HAVE to create destinations which have the same name as the logical system. However, this is not possible cause this is against corporate name conventions.
So I tried to use different destination names, but when I use the function "text comparison" (SU01->Roles) it always fails and says that the destination to the child system is missing.
So here my question: How can I tell the CUA not to search for destinations named like the logical system????
Thx in advance, nice weekend
Oliver

Hey John,
piece of cake ;).. that's what I thought at first. Unfortunately it´s not that easy. This is because of partially really strict restrictions within the SAP-Software.
At the one Module, you can choose the destination, is used for a particular group of functions. At the next, you simply can´t. SAP says "you need to have a destination, named as the logical system name". And there is no way around.
Maybe I´am the first guy being disturbed by this "feature"....
Of cause, I already placed several posts within the basis section... but still.. no way around. In one case I even opened a ticket at SAP... (I already posted the answer above) ....
Thx anyways!
Oliver

ALE logical system - File -- XI -- R/3 scenario

Hi
I have the following scenario which I'm trying to run.
File --> XI --> R/3 scenario.
I have created a sender agreement XID|ASN_out|NBD where XID is my XI 3.0 system and NBD is my R/3 system. I have also created an interface determination and receiver determination.
The following error is in transaction SXMB_MONI in my XID system:
"Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system"
Both XID and NBD are business systems defined in SLD and they have both a logical system assigned.
Why do I get this error and how can I fix it?
Best regards
Göran
Message was edited by: Göran Westin
Message was edited by: Göran Westin

Ok. I fixed the problem.
In the Integration Builder - Configuration > Select business system of choice > Menu > Service > Adapter specific identifiers > IDOC Adapter > Logical system - got a value after reading/refreshing it from the SLD.

Local logical system is not defined at BP crwation - How solve it ?

Hello,
when creatin a business partner the following message is showed:
Local logical system is not defined
I add the system by BD54, but the problem is not solved. Any idea ?
Tks a lot,

HI,
Try to attach the logical system to client and see..Use tcode->SCC4 for this.
Regards,
Nagaraj

Local logical system is not defined-Maintenance Optimizer Config

Hi,
When I try to configure Maintenance Optimizer in SAP Solution Manager 7, it gives me an error saying "Local logical system is not defined"
But I have created a Logical client using SCC4.
And the other thing is for this created client, does not have any users on this client, If I run,
SQL> select bname, UFKLAG from sapsr3.usr02 where mandt='400';
Answer is "no rows selected"
So I cannot even login in to my new client as well. I tried with SAP/PASS no use. I tried to re-set sap by deleteing it nothing helped.
my login/no_automatic_user_sapstar parameter also have 0 (But this is in Red, I dont know why its like that)
Please help me to rectify both these issues. Issue with Maintenance Optimizer and loggin in to the new client.
Thank you!

First of all, 'Logical System' and 'Logical Client' are two different things.
For Client Problem:
You did create a client in SCC4.
1. did you create a logical system via BD54 and then did you assign that logical system to this newly created client ?
2. did you perform a local client copy to put data into this new client from an old or from a standard client like 000 ?
If you didn't perform above two things, then please do. Only then, you will be able to see some data in this client and will be able to to select statements, And, obviously the SAP*/PASS login (login/no_automatic_user_sapstar should be 0 after reactivation of profile and restart of the instance)
For MOpz issue:
Could you please search in sap marketplace for any particular note specific to MOpz ?

Logical system Name Change Via Transport

Hi All,
Recently we made changes in parallel processing profile customizing table (/SAPAPO/SDP_PAR) and created entries for Macro Jobs and CIF.
For Application "CIF Delta Report", Logical system is mandatory and in Dev we gave the APO Dev Logical System Name (AD1XXX). Now when we moved the changes to Quality, expectation was that Logical system name for CIF Entry in the table would change to AQ1XXX - However, it still shows as AD1XXX there. Moreover AD1XXX entry is not a valid entry in Quality System and even when we see Drop Down values for that column (Press F4) - Only APO and ECC Quality systems names are appearing.
Please suggest how can this logical system name be corrected. One option is running BDLS, but when this TR moves to Production there also we might end up in same scenario (Logical system as AD1XXX instead of AP1XXX) and running BDLS in Production wont be approved.
Please suggest if there is any other option to handle this.
Regards,
Alok

Hi Alok,
we describe a solution in our
SAP Rapid Deployment Solutions (RDS)
Quick Link
                Access SAP Rapid Deployment Solutions (RDS) directly via
                  http://service.sap.com/rds
SAP Demand and Supply Network Planning rapid-deployment solution
Quick Link
    Access this area directly via
http://service.sap.com
/rds-dpa
In confgiguration guide
Central Master Data Replication (SCO)
you can read how it is done with
Create Entries in Table
TVARVC for Logical System Variable in Variants
Frank

Logical system name in SRM system

We are into SRM version 5.(SRM server 5.5) with the backend system as SAP ECC 6.0 .
The logical system is defined as '0000000050' for backend SAP system . All the systems like CRM and BW uses this as the logical system name for backend system . Recently SRM is implemented in our organization and we have no other choice and have to use the logical system name as '0000000050'
When product categories are assigned in the org attributes , the system stores the back end system as 50 and this is the issue. SAP support mentions that this is issue with logical system naming convention and that need to be fixed . But they fail to understand that the same name works fine in all other systems and also in SRM system except product categories .
Is there any OSS note for this fix. I would like to hear your experiences in this scenario.
Thanks
Mani

Hi Mani,
Logical System names are system specific, hence you have a different name in SRM system which will represent your backend system and this is not at all an issue. As suggested by SAP; '0000000050' is not the best name as per best practices.
You should have a name which should be of the pattern: <SID>CLNT<Client Number>.
Now here is the solution/work around. But be very careful and try this in sandbox system before being carried out in Dev/QA/PRD systems. Please make sure no other users are performing any activity while these tasks are being carried out.
In addition, please read through the ["Set up and system copy of SRM server 5.5";|https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000310782007E/SRM50_SetupTranspCopy.pdf] guide before you carry out this activity:
The below activities are to be carried out only in SRM system
I assume SRM & Backend are separate instances
1. Create a new logical system name for the backend system in SRM system as per the standard suggested above.
2. Then use the transaction BDLS, to convert the old logical system name to new logical system name in all the tables.
3. Now, the step 2 ensure the logical system name is converted appropriately in all tables except SRM Org Structure related table.
4. Use the report RHOMATTRIBUTES_REPLACE, for replacing all the old logical system value with new logical system value. Please note while providing the inputs in the screen, there will be a Checkbox field called "Sub-String", you must check this one for all attributes you enter in the report. Then when you execute the report, a list will be display, here you have to select all the rows and click the first button on the toolbar. Only then the attributes will be updated.
Please let me know, if further inputs are required.
Regards, Kathirvel

Define one logical system for PI or multiple LS for 3rd-party system?

Hi gurus,
We are using IDOC2SOAP and SOAP2IDOC scenario in PI7.11. My question is regarding the logical system(or partner profile) on R3 side. We have two 3rd party system:A and B, so we have two choices.
1. define one single logical system for PI integration server;
2. define two logical systems for A and B.
For choice 1, it seems we can only use one business sytem or business component (business service in 7.0) as the two 3rd party system, especially for SOAP2IDOC scenario.
For choice 2, it seems we have no restrictions.
Is it correct?Any help will be appreciated.

technically you can use both options.
The question is - do you want all the IDOCs in your R3 system to appear as though they were sent from the PI?
What if a lot of 3rd party systems were sending the same IDOC (for example - ORDERS) and you want to investigate only those who were sent from system A?
I like it configured that every system will be identified by a name I give it.
I just use the IDOC communication channel checkbox of "Take Sender from Payload"
or use a different service in the IBC that has a different logical system configured in its Adapter specific identifiers.
Hope it helps,
Imanuel Rahamim.

Logical system in CLEAN_REQREQ_UP and BBP_GET_STATUS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for