Logistic inv. verification exess amount

Dear all,
While doing logistic invoice verification i have received an invoice for RS120 but the PO value is 100. for this i have configured tolerance key BD Small Differences value up to 100.
When i check for messages it is saying that "tax code entered is not defined in company code'.
If i do the Invoice verification with the amount same as PO amount it is running fine.
is there any settings to be done to accept the invoice if the amount is excess of RS 100.
Plz Help
Regards,
Tilak Koganti

hi
u can use vendor correction
here at item level in miro u will find a field fo correction id
here give vendor error
choose vendor error here and then u will find two more fields of amount and quantity ,give the amot here
and post ,but this miro will block for pay
or u can try following
go to spro>mm>log inv ver>incom invoice>activate direct posting to gl acct
activeate direct posting
then u will find a new tab of gl acct after po ref tab at bottm
then go to gl acct tab here give the respective gl where u want to post the amount then select the credit or debit as required
hope it helps
regards
kunal

Similar Messages

Invoice verification and logistic invoice verification

Hello,
What is the different between invoice verification and logistic invoice verification?
My Japanese client need to work with t.code: VXJ2 - customs declaration for import billing documents - Japan
When i run this report, it finds no data.
I read the help for this transaction and it says that only invoice verification (and not logistic invoice verification) is supported for this transaction.
Best regards,
Avishai Kaplan

Hi Avishay,
Logistics Invoice Verification
Logistics Invoice Verification is a part of Materials Management (MM). It is situated at the end of the logistics supply chain that includes Purchasing, Inventory Management, and Invoice Verification. It is in Logistics Invoice Verification that incoming invoices [Seite 11] are verified in terms of their content, prices, and arithmetic. When the invoice is posted, the invoice data is saved in the system. The system updates the data saved in the invoice documents in Materials Management and Financial Accounting.
Logistics Invoice Verification is closely integrated with the components Financial Accounting (FI) and Controlling (CO). It passes on the relevant information about payments or invoice analyses to these components.
Features:
In Materials Management, Logistics Invoice Verification has the following features:
u2022 It completes the material procurement process, which started with the purchase requisition and resulted in a goods receipt.
u2022 It allows invoices that do not originate in materials procurement (such as services, expenses, course costs) to be processed.
u2022 It allows credit memos to be processed, either as invoice reversals or return deliveries.
Invoice Verification
The main aim of invoice verification is to ensure that vendors are paid the correct amount at the right time ( not too late but also not too early ). The process should have a high incidence of fi rst-time matching, to ensure that as little time as possible is spent trying to manually match invoices that appear to be incorrect.it is important to include as few steps as possible in the process, considering that the process of handling payments
does not in itself add value to the company or to the vendor.
Main steps:
The capture of the vendoru2019s invoice details
The matching of those details to the details that we
believe to be correct
The investigation of any mismatches
The release for payment of matched invoices
The accounting entries involved ( including taxes and
delivery costs )
The details recorded for audit purposes
Hope this information helps you out in understanding the differences between the two
I ncase of any further clarification do put a message
In case if this information is of any help to you please do reward accordingly
Thanks & Rewards
Pavan

Logistic Invoice Verification

Hello,
Would You help me with input fields during Logistic Invoice Verification? We have GR-based invoice verification and purchase order is created with order unit, which differs from order price unit. For example, PO quantity is 10 packing units (1 PAC = 10 pieces) and price is 1EUR per 1 piece. Goods receipt is done in packing units, but invoice is sent to us in pieces. During invoice verification I want to enter quantity in purchase order price unit (this field is read for input) and I expect that system will automatically calculate quantity in order unit using denominator for converting condition units to base units. But it does not happen so. See an example: GR 9 PAC (=90pieces), quantity invoiced 100 pieces. In trn.MIRO I want to enter 100 pieces and 10 PAC should be calculated automatically.
Would You help me with this problem?
Best regards,
Natalija

Hi ,
LIV can be done with respect to GR . And system picks the data from PO and GR only . So there is no way you can change the unit in MIRO .
Its better you educate your vendor to send the invoice in units the way it has been made in PO .
Others can add to this if I am wrong .
Thanks
Dipak

Vendor invoice and logistic invoice verification ?

Good morning Guru,
What is the difference between "vendor invoice" in accounting module and "logistic invoice verification" in MM module ?
I know logistic invoice verification to validate between po, gr and invoice, but what vendor invoice for ?
Thank's

Hi
Accounting-wise both has the same result as in both the scenarios you can debit expense and credit vendor. The advantage of Logistics Invoice Verification over Vendor Invoice is, in Logistics Invoice verification, we have three way matching of documents ie PO,GR and Invoice. So if there is any mismatch between these, the invoice will get blocked for payment. Also it checks for accuracy between PO and invoice and GR and invoice, so that the expenses are accounted accurately and price diff account also effected appropriately.
In Vendor invoice booking, it is just like your normal journal entry and so it has not got that much authenticity over the correctness of transactions. In vendor invoice booking, there is every possibility of duplicate booking of invoice, whereas in LIV, the invoice will get blocked for payment.
Hope it is clear.
Regards,
K Lakshmanan

Down Payment request VS GR based INV verification

Hi,
It seems that if a PO needs a down payment via f-47 t-code, "GR based INV verification" must NOT be flagged for that vendor.
But NOT flagging u201CGR based INV verificationu201D for the vendor, will now create a control issue, because even when there is no down payment required for a PO, a user could still fraudulently do an Invoice which is more than the actual GR.
How do I overcome this situation?

Its not mandatory to disable "GR based IV" for down payment. what made you think so? we use the down payment with "GR based IV".
are you getting any errors?
Process for downpayment.
- Entering the Purchase Order u2013 ME21n
- Entering the Down Payment Request u2013 F-47
- Posting the Down Payment u2013 F-48
- Payment run for down payment u2013 F110
- Processing the Goods Receipt for the Purchase Order - MIGO
- Posting an Incoming Invoice in Materials Management - MIRO

Out put logistic invoice verification (print out need in chinese language)

Hi All
In MR90 out put logistic invoice verification I am getting output (Printout) in English the requirement is chinese language has to add in output.I know however I need to take help of abaper.I want to know what r the configuration steps to fill this requirement.can any one help me regarding this. Points will be added..
Thanks
Srini

Hello
Check this link and coordinate with ABAper.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/d1/27d457f17b11d287d0080009b98822/frameset.htm
Reg
*assign points if useful

Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level

Dear all,
May I know what is the system setup (SPRO) for this:
Blocking logistic invoice verification at company code level ?
Thanks
tuffy

Hi There
I think it can be solved in 2 ways,,
1. Number range, if you have not defined for the particular company code for this year,,
2. Authorization for the Comp Code level (Check with your basis team ,, it will be the easieast way to block it for CC level and when ever you want they can just remove the block, (insterad of doing the changes in config, if basis can control the authorization it will be the best way)
Hope it helps,,
Thanks
Senthil

Logistic Invoice Verification Amt PO Amt

Hi,
During logistic invoice verification(T-code:MIRO), if my PO amt is 100, GR is 100 but my invoice amt is 80, I would like to absorb the other 20 to some other account ratther than to let is auto-posted.
How can I do so? Possible in MIRO?
Thanks,
CW

Hi,
This is possible,
You have to maintain the material master with Standard price control i.e S.ie the material is valuated at a standard price
A receipt posted to a stock account is generally posted at the standard price. Differences between the order price and the standard price are posted to an Expenses/revenue from price differences account.
n Differences between the invoice price and the order price are posted to an Expenses/revenue from price differences account .
You have to maintain the account determination for Transaction PRD -valuation class (Which is assign to material master)-Req G/L Accounts.
when you maintained the material master by moving average price then for posting the differences bet PO price and Invoice prices ,you must have to issue all the stock material i.e the stock coverage in the company code is smaller than the quantity to be debited or credited.
Rewards if Helpful....
Regards
Sanjay L

Inv Verification on GR twice on same PO item with multiple a/c assignment

Hi,
I have created a PO with 1 item, Qty = 2 Units, Account assignment = A (Asset) that has 2 account assignments (Partial Invoice = 2 Distribute proportionally)
Then I perform GR twice on same PO with 1 Unit each time.
After that, I perform invoice verification on GR but I get the simulation as below:-
Inv Doc: 5200075831, Item 1, Qty = 0.5
Inv Doc: 5200075831, Item 2, Qty = 0.5
Inv Doc: 5200075831, Item 1, Qty = 0.5
Inv Doc: 5200075831, Item 2, Qty = 0.5
Why Qty become 0.5?
Why Inv Doc generates 4 Items?
I would like to know whether the posting is correct.
Thanks & regards,
Esther

Hi,
U can try this badi:
ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST.

Doing Extra Credit / Debit entries during INV verification itself

This is a tricky requirement hitting MM & FI simultaneously.
Whenever you do MIRO posting thru MIR7 ( Parking ) , for a particular service orders ( Doc type ) , there is a need to pass extra credit or debit to same vendor simultaneously rather unless that Credit / Debit is generated in FI for same vendor against that particular Bill & Miro , it should not allow to save MIR7 transaction.
In std SAP first MIR7 is to be saved & if at all any extra credit / debit effect is to be given , we have to pass thru FI entry.
But contractors bill verification dept wants to have very tighter control on this & hence some amount of development is required.
One of the approaches to solution:- IN MIR7 at time of saving it should activate one BADI / User exit thru which either FB65 or may be some Z transaction to be called for that vendor as well as that work order. All extra credit / debit is to be performed & then MIR7 is to be parked / saved.
One report is required to know the details of those miros for which such extra credit or debit is given before entire things get posted to Vendors liability.
Please have a solution & Technical feasibility.

Issue resolved

Downpayment Clearing in Logistic Invoice verification

Hi All,
we have activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P " and
Switch "MM_SFWS_CI_01 - Enhanced Functions in EhP4 for Applications in
Materials Management" using Tcode SFW1. And followed all instructions
documented when activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P ". The
Busines function is activated to order to clear downpayments at the
time of invoice posting in MIRO or MIR7. When I post the invoice in
MIRO system is posting 2 indepedent document as below.
1. Invoice posting,
Dr GR/IR
Cr Vendor
2. Downpayment Recovery
Dr Vendor
Cr Vendor with SP GL Indicator "C"
My point is, as per the link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/48/b42c22e8603095e10000000a421937/frameset.htm, it says "You can use the Down Payment Clearing
function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to
a purchase order without going to the relevant financial accounting
transactions, directly in logistics invoice verification."
But, in my case, the system is not clearing the downpayment but instead
is just posting a Credit memo account entry with SP GL indicator (refer
to th Downpayment Entry).
Please advice if SAP is designed to clear the downpayment in LIV or
just to post the downpayment recovery entry.
If advice on any corrections to be applied.
Best regards
Abishay Solomon

Hi
I am not sure, but as per your link
"The system displays the Down Payment Clearing pushbutton at header level"
are you getting any button there?
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Special GL posting in Logistic Invoice Verification

Hi..
We want to post / clear down payment / Deduct the amount t to special GL Account. . SAP Standerd not suuport such functionality. Any one using such functionality in LIV (MIRO TRANSACTION).
Need your help / suggestion for same.
Thanks in advance
Thanks
Rakesh

Hi The answer from SAP for your question as follows
It is not possible to post an invoice to a special G/L account in transaction MIRO as the field UMSKZ is not available there.
The reason is, that the field UMSKZ is not available in the runtime structures of the used program in logistics IV and doesn´t exist in the database tables for MM. So if the field would be populated in transaction MIRO it could lead to problems when parking or cancelling an invoice as the field value could not be saved. Furthermore the field could not be filled in automated IV-processes.
The transaction MIRO does not cover all functionalities of the transaction FB60. Its main function is to create invoices with reference to a purchase order where it is normaly not necessary to post a different
reconciliation account.
Regards
Antony

Logistic Invoice Verification - OMR6 vs. Vendor specific tolerance

Hi, a question on the relationship between PP tolerance limit and vendor specific tolerance.
In OMR6 I have defined an upper an lower limit of 5% for a company on PP. In Vendor specific tolerances I have defined a tolerance group with lower 1% and upper 2%. This group is attached to a specific vendor.
The purchase order for this vendor shows an amount of 100 euros. When posting the invoice for this purchase order I enter a purchase price of 102,50 ( so 2,5% difference). I did expect that SAP would issue at least a warning when entering and posting the invoice using the MIRO transaction, however I am able to post the invoice without any warning/error.
Does anyone has a clue why things are not working as expected?
Thx, Paul

I did already setup vendor specific tolerances using the path you indicate. Settings are:
On percentage lower limit
   Check limit : Checked
   PercLowerAccLim : 2%
On percentage upper limit
   Check limit : Checked
   PercUpperAccLim : 1%
Thx, Paul

Tcode: MR8M---Logistic invoice verification'document can't be reversed

Dear Experts.
I have a logistic invoiceverification' document and use tcode:MR8M to reverse it ,but can't be reverseed ,the system issue the wrong information :"No reversal possible. Reverse value must be reset".please tell me how I should do? thanks!
Fanny.

Hello Fanny Chen,
In certain situations, the reversal of posting documents may be cancelled with an error. This may, for example, occur in the following situations:
The specified posting date is in a posting period that is already closed.
At the time of the reversal, the posting of the original document had not been completed.
Account assignment objects (for example, cost centers) which were posted to in the original document are closed at the time of the reversal.
Posting items that were created by the original document are already cleared at the time of the reversal (for example to customer and vendor accounts).
In your case it seems that the posting items that were created by original document are already cleared so you need to first reverse the cleared document which the system is trying to mean by saying"No reversal possible, reverse value must be reset.
UNDER THESE CIRCUMSATNCE PROBABLY YOU NEED TO USE THE TRANSACTION FOR WHICH ALL CLEARED DOCUMENT CAN BE RESET AND REVERSE
1)     TCODE :   FBRA
2)     CLEARING DOCUMENT : ENTER THE CLEARED DOCUMENT NUMBER
3)     COMPANY CODE : ENTER COMPANY CODE
4)     FISCAL YEAR : RELEVANT FISCAL YEAR
5)     CLICK THE SAVE BUTTON
6)     IN THE NEXT SCREEN CLICK YES
7)     THE SYSTEM WILL GIVE ANOTHER MESSAGE BOX WITH THREE OPTIONS :
ONLY RESETTING
RESETTING & REVERSE CLICK ON THIS
CANCEL
8)     SELECT THE MIDDLE ONE I.E. RESTTING & REVERSE
9)     THE SYSTEM WILL ASK FOR REVERSAL REASON.
10)     ENTER 01 AND THEN PRESS ENTER
11)     THE SYSTEM WILL RESET THE DOCUMENT
After this resetting is done you can use MR8M Tcode.
Hope I had been able to help you. Please assign points and close the thread.
Rgds
\Manish

GR Based Inv Verification

Hi Experts,
I made a PO with GR based inv is flagged, The matl is coming directly to quality stock in migo, some no got rejected and some nos came to unrestricted use stock, if i put MIRO with reference to the PO the total quantity is coming, im not getting any warning message, even though i have rejected some quantity. what is the solution for this.
Regards,
Rajesh

Hi Rajesh
Suggest the following approach:
1) Maintain a quality control key which has 'Invoice Block' in QM view of material master.
2) You are already using GR based IV. That's good.
3) When you create an invoice for such materials - if the item is rejected in quality or usage decision is still not taken - system blocks the invoice which you need to release later.
ANother point to note:
When you are rejecting, if the movement type is 122, system considers this in invoice.
Best regards
Ramki

Logistic inv. verification exess amount

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for