Logistic Invoice posting numbering per company code

Hi,
If we post an incomming invoice the numbering will be 5100000 for company code DE01
next posting will be 5100001 for company code FR01.
How can we setup that for every company code the number starts at 5100000?
Thank you in advance,
Eric.

Hi,
I did, but then you lose the 1 on 1 relationship with the MM LIV document.
I would like a new numberrange for the MM LIV document per company code and the financial document will follow this flow. Is this possible?
Best Regards,
Eric.

Similar Messages

  • Incoming invoice number range per company code

    Hi!
    I have a doubt.
    Is there the possibility of create incoming invoice number range per company code?
    I need the MM doc, not FI doc.
    Thank's!

    Hi
    If the settings available in OMR4 and OMRJ don't cover your requirements, try with enhancement LMR1M003.
    Regards
    Eduardo
    PD: I found it, see Note 452127 - MIRO: Standard number assignment per company code, you have a sample of coding for this enhancement
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Jul 11, 2011 6:37 PM
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Jul 11, 2011 6:38 PM
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Jul 11, 2011 6:42 PM

  • FI documents summarization from SD per company code

    Hi gurus,
    We are summarizing FI docs created through the SD module as specified in oss note 36353.
    The thing is that this summarization applies to any FI doc created no matter the company code. Any idea how to set this summarization only per company code??
    Thanks and best regards,
    VL

    Hi Teresa,
    the cost objects in CfTE are always belonging to one FI system and only can be used for postings to that system. So if you want to replicate cost objects from a central system this is possible in the following way: in the newest version of the extraction report for sales orders there is a class method CL_ODTF_COBJ_REPLICATION=>SET_ORIGIN_FI_LOGSYS( ) available to overwrite the source system of the cost object. This can be called in the BAdI for sales order replication in order to set one of the decentral FI systems as the souce system. For other cost objects this feature is only available in the next version. Here a post exit or similar needs to be used to achieve the same thing. But still you only can set one FI system. So the cost objects cannot be reused for another decentral FI systems. If one cost object shall be used for two FI systems it must be replicated twice with different source systems.
    Hope this helps. If not please ask again.
    Best regards, Reinhard

  • Default document type for F-28 per company code wise.

    Hi SAP Experts
    My client wants to default document types per company code wise for F-28.
    As per my knowledge in OBU1 is cross client and OBZO is accepting only customer invoice and credit memo but not customer payment.
    Please help with possible ideas to solve this issue, including any idea relates to substitution also. Your help is appreciated.
    Thanks in advance
    Prathima

    Hi Prathima,
    As mouri said it can be done only by Substitutions
    Since OBZO is only for enjoy transactions
    I have verified the notes aslo but there is no possibility for F-28 by company codes
    Better you can use
    Prerequisite
    SYST-TCODE = F-28
    Substitution
    use Exit
    Inside exit you need fetch the document type as per the companycode
    to achieve this you need define one ztable with company code and document type columns
    Thanks
    Vishnu

  • Actual and Plan Versions annual view - Multiple versions per company code

    Good Day,
    Iu2019m creating an FI-CO query with an annual view of both Actuals and Plan Values, which uses period and version as input values. The dilemma is around the plan versions which are hardcoded per company codes (eg. 1 Company Code = versions 501 u2013 512)
    Can anyone suggest a possible solutions as normally there is only one version used for planning but in this instance there are multiple versions per Company Code.
    Currently the report is hardcoded for one Company Code and going forward it should cater for more than one(Company Company* 12 Version)
    Kind Regards

    Remove restriction on comp code. There could be 2 models.
    1. Include comp code, value type and version in the rows. This way you get multiple records for a comp code. One record for actual data and one record each for plan versions. To have this model at the query, the data model in the cube also should be in this way (what we call as the account model), multiple records differentiated into actual/plan by valuetype and different versions by version.
    2. Include comp code in rows. Create selections, one for actuals (restrict with key fig and value type 10, actuals), one for each plan versions (restrict key fig with value type 20, version 501. Create one selection for each version this way). This way we have one record per comp code with diff key fig for actual and plan versions. We call this as key fig model. To have this model at the query, the data model in the cube could be account model or key fig model. If it is key fig model then no need of selections. The key fig could be taken directly from the cube.

  • Posting using cross company code transaction must be blocked

    Hello Guys,
    I have a  problem related to cross company code transaction.
    In the OBA7 I have the document type KE that not allows posting using cross company code transactions. In the moment that I am creating a new document through the FB01, I have an error as "Consolidated companies US52 and ' ' are different
    Message no. F5080. As a results, the document cannot be created by this way. This is the correct process.
    But I have several documents that was used the doc type KE and the cross company code transaction was used. This is my issue. I don´t know why these documents were posted. The document come from another interface via IDOC and the IDOC not errored out.
    Can anyone help on this?
    Thanks
    Rafael B.

    Hello, I´ve checked the log and no changes since 2008.
    The document was created in 2010.
    This is the message: "No logs found for the selected period"
    More suggestions?
    Regards.
    Rafael

  • Set Up Payment Methods per Company Code for Payment

    Hi All,
    Can any expert please suggest whether do we need to enter only paying company codes while defining the payment methods per company code or enter all company codes.
    Ex: We have 10 company codes for which there are 3 paying company codes. After defining the payment methods in the country, while defining payment methods per company code do we need to  define for only 3 paying company codes or for all 10 company codes. Because when you are paying through one company code on behalf of three company codes, how does it make sense having the payment method in company codes which are not paying. I hope my query is sensible.
    Thanks&Regards
    Srinivas

    Generally Payment method is defined for a customer at Company code level and Sales area level. Through Partner function we can control who has to make payment. In your case , if you need to define different customer as payer you can do so in KNVP table. while making sales order payment terms will pick from Payer of the Sold to patry customer.
    Not sure why do you wants to link to Company code

  • Set up Payment Methods Per Company code for Transaction

    Hi All,
    Can any expert please suggest whether do we need to enter only paying company codes while defining the payment methods per company code or enter all company codes.
    Ex: We have 10 company codes for which there are 3 paying company codes. After defining the payment methods in the country, while defining payment methods per company code do we need to define for only 3 paying company codes or for all 10 company codes. Because when you are paying through one company code on behalf of three company codes, how does it make sense having the payment method in company codes which are not paying. I hope my query is sensible.
    Thanks&Regards
    Srinivas

    Hi,
    You should define the payment method in all the 10 company codes regarding they are the paying or non paying company code.
    If you are not defining them they you will not have the option to select the payment for that particular company code.
    regards
    pbb

  • SAP ISU- Can you help on Invoice Rounding steps at company code level,

    Dear Friends,
    Can you help on SAP ISU Invoice Rounding steps at company code level,
    Client requirement is: - for one company code they need round the Invoice and other company codes they does not required the round option.
    We have configured some steps, which are given below,
    Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable - Basic Functions - Postings and Documents
    1.     Define Rounding Rules for Currencies
    2.     Define Accounts for Rounding Differences
    3.     Accounts for Rounding Gross Amounts (IS-U)
    4.     IS-U: Define Acct Assignment Data Relevant to Transactions
    a.     (Main Transaction 0010 and Sub Transaction 0040)
    SAP Utilities u2013 Invoicing
    1.     Define Basic Settings for Invoicing
    2.     Define Invoice Rounding Rules
    Please provide the solution; I will be appreciating for earliest answer...
    Thanks and Regards,
    Prudhvi

    Hello Christiane,
    Thanks for your quick reply, and valuable information,
    But we have u201CNo roundingu201D option available at client level, path has given below, 
    SPRO u2013 SAP Utilities Invoicing u2013 Basic setting u2013 Define Basic setting for invoicing
    We are not authorized to change any configuration at client level,
    If you can able to guide me at company code level that could be great,
    Thanks for the support
    Thanks and Regards,
    Prudhvi

  • Which table will give vendor master details per company code per purchase o

    Which table will give vendor master details per company code per purchase organisation that is all details available in XK03?

    hi
    Check T code MKVZ
    Or table LFA1
    Vishal...

  • Bus. Entity - Default Unit of Measurement per Company Code

    Experts, I have assigned the default units of measure in "Make Basic Settings in Company Code" config. Surprisingly these entries don't show up in "Default Unit of Measurement per Company Code" config under Business Enity. Also, I cannot add those entries.
    Please treat this as urgent!
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Goto RealEstate (not RE-FX, though you are using RE-FX) \ Basic settings \ Basic Setting for Company codes / Financial asset management, select checkbox of Fin Asset Mangmt for your company code.
    Now you can see this company code in company code level settings for company code in business entity level.
    Really i dont know why we have to check that checkbox of Asset management to allow at business entity level, but we have to.
    regards,
    Srini

  • Exchange rate maintainance as per company code or ledger in OB08

    Hello,
    Is it possible to maintain exchange rate as per company code or ledger in exchange rate table.
    If not, please suggest any other alternative where I can maintain exchange rate as per company code or ledger.
    Regards,
    Tapan

    In table T882, you can see ledger and company code assignment; with currency keys and additional currency types used for company code/ledger. You have option to choose the currencies at ledger and company code level, but not the currency type. Exchange rate type 'M' is used and even hard coded in many programs/transactions for actual postings. In planning, to some extent you have the option to choose exchange rate type, default is 'P'.
    Regards,
    Ganesh

  • There are no areas to post to in company code 0637

    Hi Friends,
    I have done Asset Config, created the asset and posted dep for period 01/2010
    When am running AFAB for period 02/2010 the system through an error message as below
    *There are no areas to post to in company code 0637*
    Can anyone do suggest.
    Highly appreciate for the quick response.
    Regards,
    Srinivas Muthyala

    Hello Srinivas ,
    Which selection parameters do you run AFAB with ?
    Can you check in your system whether AA690 may be justified?
    For example:
    If you run a repeat execution of depreciation for period 12 in Fiscal
    Year 2008.
    However, there is no entry in TABA for Fiscal Year 2008. Therefore
    you need to run AFAB in "planned posting run" not in "repeat run".
    Please note that you have to run first planned depreciation for your
    period xx before you might try to to a repeat run.
    Can you check TABA and see which one is the next period you should
    post to? Then start a planned depreciation run for that period.
    regards
    Ray

  • Depreciation error :There are no areas to post to in company code SN00

    Hi,
      When I am running depreciation (AFAB) for a main asset for a particular period, I am getting an error as "There are no areas to post to in company code SN00".
    On further checking, the solution seems given is as follows" Using the Customizing functions, check whether the areas to be posted have been given a posting cycle in the company code specified."
    Could not understand what does that mean.
    Any inputs will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Dusmanta

    Hi,
    You have to define how depreciation area post to general ledger.
    For this in SPRO, in Asset Accounting go to 'Integration with the General Ledger' and in to
    'How Depreciation Area post to General Ledger'.
    For your dereciation area, check whether 'Area Posts in Realtime' is selected.
    regards,
    Priya Rajesh.

  • Collection Management - Distrubution per company code

    Hi All,
    In Collection management configuration,i trying active distrubution per company code, i able see only one radio button(Direct Payers). If i see anothere sap system there is around four radio buttons(all items for HO,item from direct payerfor HO,all item for Branch and alternative payer).
    Please can anybody tell me, what is configauration for display this radio button in my sap system.
    Thanks & regards
    Ravi

    Ravi - When you say "other SAP systems" are these two systems owned by the same client?  The ability to produce Collection Worklist at either branch or head office comes as part of Enhancement Pack 4 for FSCM.  Is it possible the two systems you are looking at have different EHP levels or that the Business Functions from EHP4 are activated in one system and not the other?
    CK

Maybe you are looking for

  • Song Library Management Question

    I have a music library several times larger than my 32gb ipod. My computer recently had a hard drive failure. I reinstalled itunes with everything else. My ipod of course still works. I have about 2750 songs on it. The problem is everything in my lib

  • Order By Using Decode Function

    Order by (DECODE (length(code),9, ('substr(code,6,1) ,substr(code,1,3)'), ('substr(code,8,1) ,substr(code,1,3) ,substr(code,5,1)')) ) desc The code length could be 9 chars with the following format : 9 digits as 001-08/09 002-08/09 The code length co

  • Clean Install / Time Machine Restore

    If I do a clean install of Snow Leopard and then use migration assistant to migrate my user profile, applications, settings, etc. from the time machine backup that was created under my 10.5.8 installation - is the migration assistant going to carry o

  • Photosmart C410b loses connection to Solution Center

    Dear Forum. My Photosmart C410b loses connection to the Solution Center ("HP Photosmart Prem C410 series Disconnected!"). If remove and reinstall the HP software (latest version from the Web) it works for a while but the problem reoccurs. In the past

  • Advanced Actions in Captivate 7

    I have Captivate 6.0 but is it possible in version 7 to insert a new decison in Advanced Actions but you get to choose the insertion point for the new decision? In version 6.0 Captivate inserts the new decision at the end of the decision block. I'd l