Long DDIC Activation for Master Data Change During Transport

Good Morning Folks,
During transport of a change to a custom master data object to production, the data dictionary activation is taking a very long time and using a very large amount of space. 
The change to the master data object was adding three additional navigational attributes. This master data is not time-dependant.  The master data contains about 1.2 million records and has 49 active navigational attributes u2013 including the three new ones.  The Data Dictionary activation is executing report SAPLRSDU for more than 8 hours and is using upwards of 52GB of temp filespace (of 92GB allocated) during this time.  To the best of our knowledge, it looks as if it is trying to recreate or repopulate the /BIC/Pxxxx table of the master data.   It looks like it's reading billions of records (probably the same 1.2 m records over and over.)
There are no errors in any logs that we can see. 
Previous changes to this master data object have been successful, and reasonably fast.  And the transport of this change from Dev to our QA environment was very fast.
We still need to get this change in, as well as additional changes that are dependant.  Why would this take so long, and is there anything we can do to get this to run faster?
BTW:  We are on 3.5 (but looking forward to NW7.)
Thanks, Brian

Brian,
Usually adding nav attributes would mean that the X and y tables get regenerated...
Also do you notice reads only on the P-Table or other tables which have this object as well..?
If it is only the P Table - try refreshing the stats for the same...

Similar Messages

  • Open Transactions in ECC for Master Data changes in MDM

    Hi All,
    I have a basic Design question on how to handle the impact of Data changes in MDM for any open transactions with that Master object. For eg if we have a Material set up in MDM and in ECC and there are open Purchase Orders for that Material, now if the Base Unit of Measure is changed in MDM and gets harmonized to ECC(After Workflow approval of the Change) how will it impact the PO attached to the material . Can we do any configuration in ECC that will restrict any Open PO s not to take the new changed value and any new POs taking up the new Base Unit of Measure , or can we set up an alert/notification that will trigger for a PO whenever any Master Data is changed and the PO takes the new changed value on the fly . What will be the best approach from a solution point of view .
    Thanks ,
    Prabuddha

    Hi Prabuddha,
    In ECC if a change happens to a master data not all the changes are reflected automatically in the open documents like open PO or open Sales order. Some fields values have to be redetermined for eg: "pricing procedure", some of them needs to be changed manually for eg: "Description". Moreover specific to your eg of Base unit of measure, this is a sensitive field and has lot of impact on the process so there for changing such fields it is necessary to close all the open documents against the Master data record in consideration. This fact is regardless whether the change happens through an IDoc or directly by MM02/XK02/XD02
    Prabudha, Please revert if you have further questions.
    Best Regards
    P T Manoj
    Edited by: PT MANOJ on Sep 2, 2011 10:25 PM

  • Issue with Master data change workflow in GRC PC 10.1

    Hi,
    I have configured the work flow for master data changes in GRC PC 10.1, however approver is not able to view the request in inbox where are the organization owner is able to see the review for change request in inbox.
    Please let me know if there is any config where we need to set the approvers for workflow, so that the system creates a request for approver.
    Regards,
    Giridhar

    Dear Giridhar,
    Please, check the following configuration:
    1. Activate the workflow (Path: SPRO -> GRC -> Shared Master Data Settings -> Activate Master Data Changes)
    2. See whether Checkbox "Approval" is ticked for the selected entity
    3. If you activate master data changes, please check whether the correct roles are indicated in the Maintain Custom Agent Determination Rules in the Workflow settings.
    Business Event: 0FN_MDCHG_APPR
    Role: Select the role you gave to the approver
    After performing this configuration, a task must appear in the work inbox.
    Best Regards,
    Fernando

  • Error while activating the Master Data InfoSource for attributes

    Hai
    Im trying to load the attributes for master data characteristics .
    I created the InfoSource and when im trying to activate it .
      Then it gives the following error like below
    Diagnosis
    An error occurred in the program generation:
    Program / Template:   RSTMPL80
    Error code / Action: 6
    Row:        505
    Message:    The data object "P_S_COMM" has no component called
    Procedure
    If the problem occurred during the data load or transport, activate the transfer rule.
    If the problem persists, search in the SAP note system under 'RSAR 245'
    So please tell the what is the error and how to resolve this issue.
    And pls give the error 'RSAR 245' message from SAP note system.
    I will assign the points
    bye
    rizwan

    hi Rizwan,
    check if helps Note 602318 - RSAR 245 error analysis with RSTMPL80
    Summary
    Symptom
    The process of generating transfer rules or loading data terminates with error RSAR 245.
    The long text for error message RSAR 245 indicates the cause of the generation error.
    1. Error code: 6
    a) Message: The P_S_COMM data object has no component
    This is very likely to be due to an 'obsolete' communication structure.
    b) Message: <table name> is already declared.
    c) Other messages
    2. Error code: 7
    Other terms
    RSAR245, RSAR 245, activate transfer structure, monitor, request
    Solution
    1. Error code: 6
    a) 'Obsolete' communication structure:
                Due to an optimization algorithm, pressing the 'Generating button' does not have any affect on the communication structure. Therefore, use the following workaround:
    Select 'Communication structure' -> 'Change'.
    Add any InfoObject (for example, '0MATERIAL') to the communication structure -> 'ENTER'.
    Communication structure ---> 'Save'
    Selet the InfoObject you inserted and delete it.
    Communication structure ---> 'Save'
    Communication structure -> 'Generate'.
    a) Message: <table name> is already declared. Check whether the local part of your routines contains TABLE statements. TABLE statements always have global validity and should therefore be in the global part of the routine.
    b) If the error occurs when data is being loaded, the transfer rule should be generated using RSA1.
    In many cases, generating transfer rules using RSA1 results in a detailed error message.
    2. Error code:
               Program to be generated is locked by parallel process.
    This error can sporadically occur if parallel processes simultaneously try to generate the same program.
    Unfortunately, you cannot completely prevent the error from occurring since these types of lock situations can still crop up during data loading in parallel processes. We are currently working on improving system stability relating to lock situations during the load task.
    Reloading usually works without any problems.

  • Track Master Data Changes for Multiple countries

    Hi experts,
    I am in a Global HR Implementation & Rollout Project. We are creating Outbound Interfaces for 3 countries to export pay, time and general data to the 3rd party systems in those local countries. (Payroll is outsourced there).
    As well as sending New Joiners data every month, we need to send Changers data also to all those 3rd partys every month before the Payroll runs.
    I know 2 solution for this :
    a). Using Change Documents - Tcode : SCDO ..etc
    b). Using the report RPUAUD00.
    c). Using RBDMIDOC.
    Query :
    1). Are these the only solutions ?
    2). Whats the best solution for doing this for a Global Rollout project ? I need to track master data change for different countries for different set of Infotypes and fields. I need to send those Changers data as well as the New Joiners data through the Outbound Interface to all the local countries.
    This year we are doing for 3 countires, next year for 9 more countries, etc. Whats the best solution keeping this in mind ?
    Restrictions :
    1). Our Client HRs dont want us to disturb the report RPUAUD00 as they use that regularlly and want the flexibility to configure the configs themselves.
    2). If I must need to create and activate Change Documents for ALL individual fields, is there an easy way of doing this ?
    3). I need to send this Changers data from SAP to Legacy system, so dont know if RBDMIDOC will be a good solution for this. Any comments ?
    Just want the best possible and feasible solution for this issue.
    I will be please to allot point to anyone who gives a good solution.
    Moreover will be Thankfull also !!
    Cheers.

    Please try with transaction code "PC00_M02_LINF0"
    Cheers
    Suresh.KK

  • Why to use chnage  pointers for  master data idoc why not  the  change idoc

    Hi Gurus,
    I have  one doubt about  Idoc.
    When changes to master  data has to be sent Change pointers are configured and  used. (CDPOS & CDHDR). In case of  the  transaction data change change idoc  is  used as is the case with orders (we  use ORDCHG for  ORDERS message type to send  the  chnage details to a  order which was already sent to other system.
    Why we can't use  change  idoc or  message type whatever, instead of  Chnage pointers in case of  master data or  vice versa in case  of transaction data.
    Your valuable  input  will be rewarded with suitable  points!!
    -B S B.

    Hi,
    It was a good question ... SAP seems never designed the change pointer to handle transactional data IDocs. Only for master data IDocs distribution purposes.
    It may due to volume data ... the transactional data can change many times within a day compare with master data which hardly change or once a while.
    Regards,
    Ferry Lianto

  • HR ABAP : Track Master Data changes for multiple countries

    Hi experts,
    I am in a Global HR Implementation & Rollout Project. We are creating Outbound Interfaces for 3 countries to export pay, time and general data to the 3rd party systems in those local countries. (Payroll is outsourced there).
    As well as sending New Joiners data every month, we need to send Changers data also to all those 3rd partys every month before the Payroll runs.
    I know 2 solution for this :
    a). Using Change Documents - Tcode : SCDO ..etc
    b). Using the report RPUAUD00.
    c). Using RBDMIDOC.
    Query :
    1). Are these the only solutions ?
    2). Whats the best solution for doing this for a Global Rollout project ? I need to track master data change for different countries for different set of Infotypes and fields. I need to send those Changers data as well as the New Joiners data through the Outbound Interface to all the local countries.
    This year we are doing for 3 countires, next year for 9 more countries, etc. Whats the best solution keeping this in mind ?
    Restrictions :
    1). Our Client HRs dont want us to disturb the report RPUAUD00 as they use that regularlly and want the flexibility to configure the configs themselves.
    2). If I must need to create and activate Change Documents for ALL individual fields, is there an easy way of doing this ?
    3). I need to send this Changers data from SAP to Legacy system, so dont know if RBDMIDOC will be a good solution for this. Any comments ?
    Just want the best possible and feasible solution for this issue.
    I will be please to allot point to anyone who gives a good solution.
    Moreover will be Thankfull also !!
    Cheers.

    I have used PU12 for same purpose at a similar client. It will fulfill all your needs I guess, but the learning curve is big. Search for "Interface Toolbox" or "PU12". Basically your search will end-up in these two links:
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PAXX/PYSOME_INTERFACE.pdf
    HR Interface Toolbox - PU12

  • RDA for Transactional Data Changes (But needs to load as Master Data to IO)

    Hi,
        I would like to use RDA to load Data changes into IO (Not for DSO).
    I tried using this, i can able to load data into PSA. But, from PSA to IO, No datapackage is getting transfered. i.e. Transfered records = 0.
    We considered several options i.e. remote cubes etc. We need to implement RDA.
    Note: I have gone through the Documentation on RDA. Which SAP mentioned, RDA won't support for Master Data if we have aggregates. We don't have any Aggregates build on my cubes.
    Thanks in advacne!!!
    Nagesh Ganisetti.

    RDA DTP is used for supplying data to the Data Store Objects but not to the Master data infoobjects...
    Please follow the links to get to know more on this..
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/f98e07cc483255e10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/42/fa50e40f501a77e10000000a422035/content.htm
    thanks
    hope this helps..

  • Retro master data change for previous cost center

    HI All,
    Could any one please reply on how I can unblock 'blocked cost center' to make retro changes for Master data.
    Thank you in advance. 
    Abhay

    Hi Abhay,
    1. Unblock the cost center for the period to apply the Master data changes. Unblock it via transaction KS02.
    2. Once the legacy cost center is unblocked, immediately proceed with master data updates.
    3. Once master data is updated, proceed with restoring the blocked status of the cost center that was used (Unblock).
    Thanks,
    Dhiraj

  • Where are the changes in R3 captured in ROCANCEL, mapped to for Master data

    Hi Experts,
    I have now read extgensively about 0Recordmode and how it becomes part of the DSO and changes in R3, captures in ROCANCEL gets mapped to 0Recordmode.
    But when the datasource is a master data, such as 0Plant_Attr, which is going to flow into the InfoObject, 0Plant; we know 0Plant does not containt 0Recordmode as seen in the case of the DSO. So, without 0Recordmode, where are the changes in R3 captured in ROCANCEL, mapped to when it comes to master data, such as 0Plant
    Thanks

    Hi,
    0Recordmode is the BW concept in Delta Loading to DSO. It is not R/3 concept.. SAP has provided To make the BW system to understand the entire info about the delta. As you know this is mapped to ROCANCEL.
    ROCANCEL holds the changes from R/3 side.
    The delta process (how the data is transferred) for the DataSource is determined in the table ROOSOURCE(in the source system)
    Properties of the delta process are determined in the table RODELTAM (in BI). So Master Data Changes will be handled by this way.
    Regards,
    Suman

  • Online Change Transfer for Master Data

    HI,
    whats transaction for Online Change Transfer for Master Data, and how to use it.
    regards
    manish

    Hi Manish ,
    You make the settings for change transfers in transaction *CFC9 (Change Transfer
    for Master Data setting)*
    For material masters, customers and vendors, the change transfer can occur
    periodically or can be executed online immediately. You also have the option of
    deactivating the change transfer.
    You can also configure an immediate change transfer for work centers and
    resources. In this case, the change transfer only concerns the header data of the
    individual work center capacities.
    Hope it will help you.
    regards
    Ritesh

  • Student file & master data change according to authority

    Deal all,
    I have following requirements about student file and master data that certain IT are not displayed when i do not have authority.
    for example, if A student is belong to my department, IT1702 must be dislayed but student B is not belong to my department IT1702 must be disabled or must dissappear.
    if i can adjust student file & master data according authority (student belong to my department or not) it would be very nice.
    regards,
    jin dal

    Hi,
    The authorizations checks in Campus Management consist of the basic authorization and the structural HR authorization.
    The basic authorization determines whether the user is allowed to execute a certain function, while the structural authorization determines the objects for which the user is allowed to execute this function. In other words, the basic authorization defines what function the user is allowed to use, and the structural authorization defines for which objects the user is allowed to use this function.
    For example, the basic authorization can define that the user is allowed to perform the create module booking activity. With the structural authorization you can restrict this activity only to modules offered by the faculty of Mathematics, for example. (The user can then access these modules whenever required; see also Structural Authorization).
    Basic Authorization
    In release CM 4.64, three authorization objects are used in Campus Management:
    At the first level is the transaction code check. The system performs this check each time the user starts a transaction using the menu or command line. For this check to be successful, the user requires an authorization for the relevant transaction code in the authorization object S_TCODE.
    At the second level, the Campus Management function is divided into two parts. The first part includes activities such as create request, create registration, create re-registration, cancel module booking, and so on. The second part covers master data like student master data and a major part of the academic structure.
    When checking the authorizations for master data, the system uses the HR authorization object PLOG for master data authorization checks. A new authorization object ( P_CM_PROC) has been implemented for activities in release CM 4.64. The system now only checks whether the user is authorized to use the activity. It no longer checks if the user is authorized to read or change the data in this activity. The new authorization concept has the following advantages:
    It simplifies authorization assignment. The system no longer uses the comprehensive data model with its many objects and object interrelationships as the basis for the activity authorization (authorization assignment via authorization object PLOG);
    Changes in the data model have no effects on the authorization checks for activities;
    It is now possible to distinguish between create and change operations, for example in re-registrations;
    You can now distinguish between re-registrations and leaves of absence.
    The table T7PIQPROCESS (Activities) contains all Campus Management activities. The system performs authorization checks for all activities with the exception of the ones listed below.
    Authorization checkes are not performed for the following activities:
    AC10 (Send Reminder for Outstanding Payments)
    HSMA (Create Status Indicator Manually)
    PR11 (Create Applicability List Automatically)
    These activities do not contain any activity-related authorization checks.
    In the standard system, the authorization check for activities is independent of the objects for which the activities are performed, and of their attributes. (The structural authorization only restricts the objects which the user can then process irrespective of the activity.). If you require additional checks, you can use the business add-in HRPIQ00AUTHORITY.
    Structural Authorization
    The structural authorization enables you to define the set of objects the user is authorized to process. You determine these objects using evaluation paths. You can define whether the user should only be given a display authorization for these objects or a maintenance authorization as well.
    You cannot combine the structural authorization with the basic authorization. The user is therefore authorized to process the assigned set of objects irrespective of the function (s)he is currently using.
    Further notes
    As functions from other applications areas (Training and Event Management, Notification Processing) and from Student Accounting are integrated in Campus Management, users also need authorizations from these areas.
    Campus Management contains a number of roles which you can combine with the roles of other application areas to create composite roles. You can either assign a composite role or individual roles to users.
    Component Prefix of the roles provided
    Campus Management SAP_CM_
    Training and Event Management SAP_HR_PE
    Notification processing SAP_CA_NO_NOTIF
    Student Accounting SAP_FI_CA_
    You create the business partner authorizations in separate IMG activities which you can find in Customizing for Campus Management in Campus Management Master Data -> Students -> Students as Business Partners -> Basic Business Partner Settings -> SAP Business Partner -> Business Partner -> Basic Settings -> Authorization Management.
    In the SAP Reference IMG under Basis Components -> System Administration -> Users and Authorizations, you can find more IMG activities in which you can make general settings for authorizations.

  • Error while creating Data Source for master data attributes

    Hi BI Experts,
    Well its been some time for me that I have been part of Extraction in BI.I primarily handled reporting in my last assignments.
    I was trying extraction with flat files in SAP BI 7(new to sap bi 7 but very much familiar with BW3.5) but failed in the activity during master data attributes and text upload in infoobject (say IOSP_Mat).
    Here is the procedure that I did after creation of characteristic IOSP_Mat.I created a source system for flat file followed by data source for Master data attributes, i selected all the parameters correctly.i.e. csv file format, data seperator as   ,
    and other settings, now when i am trying to look at the proposed data in the next tab using Load example data.its not showing the desired result.The columns that I have maintained in Flat File is  MAT_NUMBER and MAT_NAME (with say 100 data in the file)
    same is the result when I am trying to load the text data too columns maintained are
    (LANGUAGE MAT_NUMBER Short Description)(same 100 data).
    now i used to rsa1old transaction  to upload the file using 3.5 version.i created info source for master data/text/hierarchies for  IOSP_Mat
    now when trying to upload it using info package for master and text data,I observe its(the data) not maintained in the characteristic IOSP_Mat.
    When I monitored ,I figured the data has not been even uploaded to the PSA level.
    Can you BI experts tell me the answer for this.
    Thanks,
    Srijith

    apologies to all of you for late response,
    was busy with some other activities.
    I don't remember the exact message,but I remember it was not loaded to even the PSA level.I will try it again and post the exact message.
    Thanks again for your quick response.
    Once again sorry to all of you for my late response
    Thanks,
    Sri

  • Error when activating the master data

    Hi
    I am getting the following error when activating the master data. when using IDOC as transfer method in transfer rules
    <b>Error while creating table 'EDISEGMENT' entry '/BIC/CIRB0CLASS_NUM_TEXT'</b>
    If anyone came across this kind of problem plz share the solution.
    Regards
    Annie

    Hi
    I solved the problem. AFter changing from PSA to IDOC, i just saved first and activated. it got activated. But thanks for the response.
    There are no short dumps in ST22
    Regards
    Annie

  • Effect of 'No update' for master data texts

    Hello all,
    I am using flexible update - update rules - for master data text. I want to confirm effect of 'No update' in following scenario
    In the fisrt set of update rules -from first source system -I have mapped both short text and long text
    Key  |  short text| long text
    ......| overwrite| overwrite
    K1    | some SHTX| some LGTX
    In the second set of update rules, I have selected 'No update' for Long text
    Key  |  short text | long text
    ......|overwrite| NO UPDATE
    K1    | some SHTX |
    My loading sequence is first source system followed by second source system
    what should be my ultimate long text and why?
    Many thanks in advance!
    Regards
    Sanjyot

    Hi surekha,
    your long text will not get changed.
    Take the example you mentioned
    Key | short text.....| long text
    ........| overwrite......| overwrite
    K1 | some SHTX.. | some LGTX
    In the second set of update rules, I have selected 'No update' for Long text
    Key | short text... | long text
    ........|overwrite......| NO UPDATE
    K1 | some SHTX. |
    In the second set of update rules, you mentioned "No UPdate", So, when a record with the same key is found n Masterdata, it is not going to make any changes to the field Long text.
    Where as short text will get overwritten.
    Take some data for ex with the above mentioned type
    data from source 1 : 2000 Maggi Noodles
    data from source 2 : 2000 Feasters
    when the data from first source system arrives, data will be 2000 maggi noodles
    when the data from second source suystem arrives, as there exist this records with same key(2000), it checks for the other fiels
    short text will be over written with the value in second system (according to rules its in overwrite mode)
    Long text will not be updated as the rule says no update.
    hope this helps,
    Cheers,
    Srinath.
    Cheers,
    Srinath.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Inbound delivery for Production Order in EWM

    Hi We have a scenario of creating Inbound Delivery, Pack (HU), GR and Putaway via an interface in EWM from an external system. Basically the transaction of /scwm/grpi and /scwm/prdi. I found this below thread which is little old. Could you please con

  • Full Bonus Depreciation irrespective of DPIS

    Hi All, We want the Full 50% Bonus Depreciation to be taken for the first year irrespective of DPIS, we want this only for Bonus Depreciation and not for the actual Depreciation for an asset having STL Depreciation Method, so we do not want to change

  • Please solve the code inpsector error: Sequential read access possible

    Hi,   i am getting code inspector warning message . could u please try to provide the solution for that warning message. code inspector warning message is :   Sequential read access possible for a hashed table My statment :  read table <lt_product_mb

  • Deleted default Photoshop CS5 Save for Web settings, but they return after a restart

    How do I permanently delete the default Save for Web settings that come with Photoshop CS5? (Default Settings.iros, Background Image.iros, etc) In CS4 you deleted them once, and they were gone. In CS5, if you delete them, they are recreated when you

  • Is it possible to minimize a JPanel

    I have a program that extends JPanel. I'd like to add a standard minimize button to the upper right-hand corner of this panel like on a JFrame. I'd also like there to been an item in the taskbar (I'm running on NT) for this application when this app