Long render times in Premiere CS6

Hello everyone.
I am exporting my first ever Premiere show. It is a 82 min. long program, HDV 1080i. Everything is rendered - the entire timeline is green. It took well over 2 hours to render, which seems excessive to me, though I did have filters on almost everything.
In the Export Settings window, both "Match Sequence Settings" and "Use Previews" boxes are checked. I expected that since I already rendered everything, this would mean that the export would go very quickly, as the entire show was essentially rendered already. But, it is halfway done, and already taken 20 min., so looks like 40 min. for the whole thing. Am I doing something wrong? Can I do anything to speed things up? When exporting a similar "pre-rendered" show from Final Cut 7 on this computer, it would take just a few minutes.
My specs: I am on a Mac Pro, 2x3 GHz Quad Core, 8G of RAM. I do have a newer Mac with a faster processor & more RAM, which I am going to experiment with the same project later on. But I still think this is awfully slow on the current computer, at least compared to the performance I got with Final Cut 7.
Thanks much
Mike Weber
UCTV
http://www.uctv.tv

If you had a PC I would suggest that you compare your PC with others using Premiere Pro CS6. Take the test at http://www.ppbm5.com and see how you stack up. You might be able to detect any possible bottlenecks from your CPU, GPU, memory or disks.
When comparing your scores, only compare to other CS6 tests. Apparently 5.5 was a bit faster at some things.
I see that I have been knocked down to #3 for CS6 - by three seconds. I think I could reconfigure my drives a bit to match his by using my extra SSD for projects, but I prefer to keep it the way it is as a true hot spare. For now at least.  I don't really know how he got better scores in some of the other categories. I don't think I actually care that much at this point either.
The point I am trying to make though, is that I can see where someone with almost identical specs has arranged things a tiny bit better than I have, as far as speed is concerned. He beats me by 3 seconds, but he bettered me by only one second in two categories, two seconds in another, and I gained a second on him in another.
These results basically tell me to leave well enough alone.
However, if I had seen a 5 second loss on drives, for example, or on RAM, then I would have something solid to consider upgrading.
Take a look at the difference between my #3 (remember to only look at CS6 by checking CS6 in the Version tab) and PCx79 who is 11 seconds slower on the weighted total (so the actual numbers do not add up). One second in the disk i/o so that isn't really a factor. MPEG one second. Nothing there.
H.264 BR is a factor. He lost seven seconds. That is the CPU and probably just reflects the fact that I allowed Eric to overclock my system to 4.5 since we have the same CPU but his is clocked to 3.9. Which demonstrates a LOT of trust on my part because I don't really "get" overclocking but I have decided to trust Eric.
MPE Off was a big difference too. I don't understand this one because he has a slightly better graphics card. It must be more of the overclocking? I don't know.
So, it is fairly easy to spot the advantages of the overclocking of his 3.9 to my 4.5 I think.
Take a look at your scores. If they fall into line with other people who have similar equipment, be happy that you seem to have configured your system correctly. On the other hand, if you see a problem you can't really explain, look there. That is your starting point. Or, perhaps you just give the slow PC to a needy relative and splurge on something new for yourself.
Unfortunately, I don't believe that PPBM5 works for a Mac. Yet. Volunteer to be a beta tester.

Similar Messages

  • Long render time with premiere pro CS5 lately,  help!

    lately my premiere pro CS5 render extremely slow
    i have a 6GB ram 64bit windows 7
    is it normal to render a 10 minutes quicktime/h264 codec in 5 hours?
    please take a note that this happened recently, so i think my pc spec. should not be the problem
    thanks in advance

    You start off with the wrong sequence settings. To resolve that, right click on a clip in the project panel and select 'New Sequence from Clip". That will give you the correct sequence setting for your source material.
    When exporting, never use QuiRcktime, since it is a 32 bit application, plagued with numerous severe problems, hence the name. Use plain 64 bit H.264 codec for exporting. If you use Maximum Render Quality, your export can take many times longer than without that checked.
    Your memory and presumably the rest of your system (please give details) is not up to this task, especially not when you start with the wrong sequence settings, export with a 32 bit codec and have MRQ turned on.

  • Ridiculously long render length in Premiere CC

    Hi all!
    I posted this on the LinkedIn Premiere boards, but no one really had a true answer. Some nice workarounds, but no real solution. I am working on a MacBook Pro 2.7GHz Intel Core i7, 16GB 1600 MHz DDR3 with an NVIDIA geForce GT 650M 1024 MB card.
    Premiere CS6 gave me very few issues. Sure, things were slowish, but workable.
    With Adobe Premiere CC, I am hostage to ridiculously long render times for videos. I am currently working on a video that is 2:35 long - that's TWO MINUTES AND THIRTY-FIVE SECONDS!! - with three video tracks, two audio tracks and 15 total applied transitions between the tracks. I selected Render In to Out and have now been waiting over fifty minutes for this to complete.
    I have over 140GB open space on my machine.
    The source file is HD, 1440x1080 MP4. All other files are placed graphics and MP3 for an audio bed.
    How does it take over an hour to render a video that is shorter than three minutes?!
    Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi, you're my only hope.

    I get that same delay on rendering to network drives but not when rendering to local SSD. Yea but that long 100% delay on h.264 mp4 file rendering is ridiculous. It used to not do that before the previous update before CC 2014. I noticed it a week or two ago.
    To the OP, even with simple timelines, any compression may eat up a lot of time... such as rendering to a lossy codec or any codec for that matter. You may be better off rending to a portable hard drive (via usb 3.0 or greater) a lossless master render and then transcode the master instead of using premiere to transcode.. assuming that's your situation... ??

  • Xtremely long render times

    I am doing a very simple project that seems to be taking longer than it should. I'm taking Sony HDV 1080i clips, about 10-15 minutes long, and adding an elapsed time window, and a time code reader window to them for a research client.  3 layers, no editing, no sound. I have place the HVD file in it's native sequence, so there's no rendering until I add the filters from FCP.  Then, it takes from 11-15 hours to render these sequences, then another 2 or so to export the files as h.264 for the client's use.  That seems really long to me.  I made a compressor setting, h.264 1920x1080, 25000kb, so I might avoid the long render time, but that took about 9 hours.  Am I missing something?  I usualy work with DVCPro HD, and notjhing I do, with lots of laysers take that long.

    Not looking over your shoulder, I'm making a few possibly invalid assumptions.
    The HDV is your first major problem. You should transcode that to ProRes422LT on ingestion and build your sequence in that format. The files are much larger but they're uncompressed. Well, they're compressed but they don't require decompression before they can be rendered.
    Exporting to H.264 from PRLT in 1080 is  four to six times realtime depending on your system's specs. I't seight times on mine.
    Placing your HDV sequence into a native sequence only means the base layer doesn't need to be rendered to be played. But the HDV must be unpacked, frame at a time, to be rendered with effects and that takes two to six times realtime. You say the clips are 15 minutes but you don't say how long the sequence that takes 15 hours to process is.
    bogiesan

  • After Effects CS6 super long render times.

    I am trying to render multiple 30 second long compositions and the renders are reaching over 5 hours each. There is nothing special in any of the compositions. I have rendered these same compositions in the past with minor changes in AE CS5 and they finished in seconds using the Open GL renderer. I understand CS6 uses a different engine for rendering. I have ensured my video card is in the supported list (added it), and ray tracing is set to the GPU. I triple checked all the drivers and everything is up to date. I have tried every combination of settings I can think of with no results. Help!
    System Specs:
    i7-3930K
    GTX 770
    32gb ram
    Windows 7 64bit

    Five hours is not an unusual render time for a 30-second composition, depending on the details of the composition.
    See this page for resources about making After Effects work faster: http://adobe.ly/eV2zE7

  • Much longer render time for a few small changes?

    I bought a new Macbook pro last week with a 2.4 ghz intel i5 processor and 8 GB of ram. I got Adobe premiere pro yesterday and I made a video which combined taking footage shot from my flip video camera and audio commentary that I recorded across the full video. The video was rendered with the setting H.264 and the preset Youtube widescreen HD, the final video was about an 800 MB .mp4 file. It took about 30-40 minutes to render.
    Today, I added a 17 minute mp3 file for background music, which was 17 mb. I also added 6 images and 2 titles which overlay the video at different points. The only other thing I added along with these two was a 16 second mov file which serves as an intro video to my series. With these 3 (what I consider to be fairly small) changes, my render time has jumped dramatically. With the same export settings, I see the render time build and build until it reaches 4+ hours and I decide to stop. I've tried a couple different formats, but I'm not sure what else to do. I feel that 8gb should be plenty to render a video like this fairly quickly (like I did yesterday) and I'm not sure why it's taking so long compared to yesterday. Is this normal? Any help to guide me with reducing render times would be much appreciated. Thanks!

    The Export time will differ by what one is Exporting from and what they are Exporting to. In this case, the "to" has not changed.
    What has changed?
    Well, the stills for one. What is the format and what are the pixel x pixel dimensions of those?
    The addition of the MOV is another place to look. What is the CODEC inside that MOV "wrapper?" Having to decode via the CODEC can impact the Export time.
    The new Audio has changed. What is the format/CODEC of that music file?
    Those are the first thoughts that I have on this, and good luck,
    Hunt

  • Slow render times in Premiere when linking After Effects media

    I'm an Avid Media Composer editor but I just switched to Premiere for a special project that needs to have non-interlaced output. I've been pretty impressed until I integrated an After Effects project into my timeline. My render times have now increased exponentially, despite the fact that the After Effects effects are quite simple - single layers of video with very simple moves. Can anyone else chime in with their experience integrating After Effects projects into Premiere? This just seems too horrible to be true.

    I've found that the time to render out of After Effects versus the time to render a Dynamic Link comp in PPro is roughly identical. In fact, in many cases it's a bit quicker.
    For heavy duty comps, I'd expect to see PPro struggle a little bit more, but definitely not with the basic work you seem to be talking about.

  • Help - Getting slower render times with AE CS6

    Hi everyone
    Wonder if anyone else is getting as described?
    I have a 3m37s project which is predomnantly motion graphics using live shot footage (.MXF files), Illustrator and a few JPGs.
    In CS5 AE I get render times which average around 45mins, so I thought I'd see how quickly CS6 could crank it out by - as you can see I'm getting times which are in excess of 2 almost 3hours!
    The project contains a few 2.5D moves as well as tiny bit of Trapcode 3D Stroke
    I have mentioned on this forum that I'm having the Error 5070 problems with start up and Ray Trace is unavailable but these times seem seriously wrong to me.
    Mac Pro 3,1 (2x 2.8GHZ)
    20GB RAM
    OS 10.7.4
    NVIDIA GeForce GT8800
    NVIDIA Quadro 4000 both on GPU Driver 207.00.00.f06
    CUDA Driver 4.2.10
    All files are on a 2TB drive (7200rpm)
    Rendering to a 1TB drive (7200rpm)
    Corsair SSD 60gb Cache drive
    As an observation when I watch the frames counter ticking over, CS5 seems to steadily work it's way through the render at around less than a frame a second, CS6 seems to crank out 2-6 frames then hold for 30secs before working on another batch. It crawls to a halt near the end.
    Can anyone offer any help or advice?
    So far I'm not having a great time with my CS6 transition
    Thanks
    Rob
    Message was edited by: Bokeh Creative Ltd
    because of a Typo

    Thanks Rick - Yes what confused me was that it only took 45mins in CS5 even with MP 'on'
    Still having no joy with Ray Tracing though, even though I have a Quadro 4000 card, I get the 5070 error on start up. Any ideas?

  • Rendering Hundreds of Audio Previews Upon Export, Long Render Times

    Hi everyone,
    I have an assembly cut of a feature, with footage and a timeline at 422 ProRes HQ, 24 fps, 96kHz audio.
    When I try to export any length of a clip, I get exorbitant render times and hundreds of audio previews to render.
    Video alone is rendered almost instantaneously.
    There are some audio files on the timeline (music and SFX) at 48k sample rate.
    Any ideas what the problem is?
    Thanks.
    Premiere CC 2014
    OSX Mavericks
    2 X 2.66 Quad Core Xeon
    32 GB memory
    NVIDIA Quadro 4000 w/ CUDA
    3 tB 7200 RPM - RAID 0

    Thanks, Ann. I'm thinking that may be a factor because this is the first time I've had to work with audio recorded at 96 and I've never had this problem.
    Can anyone else elaborate more?

  • Long render time in FCP after using Handbrake

    After seeing a suggestion in these forums on converting non-copy written DVDs to usable files in FCP I downloaded Handbrake. It works fine but the render times seem to be extremely long.
    Is there any way to speed this up or perhaps any other programs I can use?

    Match your export settings to an Easy Set up preset in FCP.
    And you don't need Handbrake for unencrypted DVDs.
    Use MPEG Streamclip

  • New machine, new drives...all of a sudden, long render times. Need help!

    Just purchased a new 8 core, 6 gigs of ram, and Sonnett raid array. All going well for a few weeks. Now, just to render a simple jpeg with a drop shadow or a 5 second Motion file it takes 7 minutes. I feel like I just threw 10 grand out the window! What is going on? Please help.

    Thomas, I have a late 2007 MacPro, I have also just started with HD, well HDV, editing. I use motion very heavily and have to say that I have been noticing pretty significant render times as well. To answer your question yes, exporting an FCP sequence-native animation from motion will be muuuch faster that using templates. Templates are cool, and the idea is right on the money, but from what I have found, they take a long time to render and do not play back very well in FCP unless they have been fully rendered. If I use a template, it is with a graphic that I will overlay once the entire timeline has been put together, this way, I don't have to screw around with rendering templates as I am trying to edit other video/audio/graphics together in the timeline. I just finish the timeline, add the templates, and render the whole thing at once.
    Like you, I am becoming very frustrated. As I mentioned above, my work around is to export most of my Motion 3 animations in HDV 1440x1080, send them to FCP and then they don't require any rendering at all - the only downside is that it won't support an alpha channel (at least not that I've seen) so those animations can't use any transparency.
    Finally, I have also been having a ton of crashing issues with FCP giving me that same message about "Pro Media Plug In may have caused the crash" or whatever that dumb message says. I looked for any plug in that matched that description and couldn't find it - so I am dumbfounded. Has anyone else had this issue - FCP has crashed 8 times on me today.
    Good luck, I'll be checking back on this thread to see if anyone has a fix or workaround or whatever.

  • Long Render times Looks

    I love MB Looks - really getting into it...but the render times are killing me.
    Could I potentially speed things up?  Right now, I'm looking at 25 minutes to render about a minute.
    Just to clarify, these clips are at about 45% speed and already have a Looks color filter on them. I've just added the misfire vignette, (which I think looks better than the vingettes I used to make with black video and the circle effect).
    Previous to adding MisFire, everything was all rendered up....
    Twiddling Thumbs.....
    J

    Looks is slow to render, but after completing a recent project I have discovered that the misfire effects are extremely slow.  They are optimized very well.  I feel like they need a major overhaul to take advantage of multicore CPUs.  A great alternative to using the circle filter or misfire to create a vignette is to use the titler.  In order to get realtime playback with my GPU, I did the following:
    1. Create a new title and add a black square the size of the title plate
    2. Add a white oval to the center of the title (the size of the oval will control the size of the vignette)
    3. Place the title in the track above the video you want to add the vignette to
    4. Change the transfer mode to Multiply
    5. Add a Gaussian Blur and crank the blur up to create a smooth gradient from white to black (I had a value in the hundreds)
    6. Adjust the opacity to taste
    Just another way to create a vignette that will render much faster.

  • Render times in Premiere Pro CS6

    In this otherwise very helpful article (link below) can anyone tell me if the numbers referred to in this table are hours: minutes, or minutes: seconds? In other words, by 8:16, do they mean 8 hours and 16 minutes, or 8 minutes and 16 seconds?
    http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/creativesuite/produ ction/cs6/pdfs/adobe-hardware-performance-whitepaper.pdf

    minutes & seconds.

  • Long Render Times in HDV

    I've just started on FCP HDV and have noticed that it take a really long time to render. The timeline is set up in the same formatt at the files i've captured and my export settings follow suit.
    can anyone explain why it takes an hour to export 4 minutes of timeline.
    I am running a brand new G5 and the IT dept have it running well.
    I know that HDV is huge but I never had this problem with Premiere Pro HD.
    Cheers heaps for any replies,
    NicNeame

    I am making DVD's in the end. I have used the easy set up and everything is flush. Exports are done using Quicktime export not quicktime Conversion. My other question is there an easy to export a low res QT of the timeline quickly.
    I am also using the H.264 blah blah range of codecs too but only on renders with Aftereffects. They dont need to be rendered in the FCP timeline and my fields still look good.
    Im pretty sure I have the intermediate codec though. Is ther a completed codec out yet?
    Thanks for the replies guys

  • Premier Pro Windows 7 playback stuttering long render time

    Hey
    I have creative cloud with premier pro and I just tried rendering a project for the first time since I updated to 7.1. The project is taking an exceedingly long time to render even just a 20 second clip, I have seen posts about mac updates but I am using windows can people help?

    Thanks for the additional info.
    "from fraps" is not informative--at least not for me since I don't use Fraps. Frame dimensions? Codec? File type/wrapper? Frame rate? Is frame rate constant or variable?
    By "sequence setting using same as clip," am I right that you created the sequence from one of the clips? Regardless, a screenshot of the sequence settings dialog would help.
    Also, in the Export Settings dialog, do you click Export (which uses Premiere Pro to encode) or Queue (which sends the job to AME)?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Best practice for remote topic subscription with HA

    I'd like to create an orchestrator EJB, in cluster A, that must persist some data to a database of record and then publish a business event to a topic. I have two durable subscribers, MDBs on clusters B & C, that need to receive the events and perfor

  • First record is not an IDOC control record - Error

    When I am trying to import orders in my test system through RSEINB00 , it is giving me this error "First record is not an IDOC control record" But if I manually do it through test tool , it post successfully. I tried different files which have been p

  • Black Magic Intensity Pro output issues in FCP7

    I just installed a Black Magic Intensity Pro in my office's edit/mix computer. I cannot get FCP7 to output video correctly. The monitor auto senses the HDMI output settings correctly (matching what I have chosen in FCP) but I only get a freeze frame

  • ITunes 8 (WIndows) remote speaker problem: plays only (very) intermittently

    Running iTunes 8.1.0.52, Windows XP, on an HP 2230s laptop (2.53 GHz Core2Duo). I can play audio through the computer's speakers, no problem. When I connect to my remote speakers (via Airport Express), audio plays for only a moment or two, then stops

  • How to change icons size? - lollipop update

    Sony recently gave an update on the Xperia Z Ultra which brought a new launcher as well, which unfortunately introduced extremely huge icons.Is there any way to reduce the icon size or downgrade the verion of the launcher as I would like to stick to