Long Time: Fill Internal Header Table for VBUK via Doc. Flow Predeces

Good Morning Support,
I have installed DMIS (2006_1_620) and DMIS_CNT (2006_1_620), both atthe level of SP = 13. Data Base = Informix.
The activity "Header Fill Internal Table for Predicting Flow VBUK via Doc" is taking a long time in execution.
I wanted to create an index to improve performance according to the note 1256679 but I can not because the tables VBFA and VBFCL are "Table cluster" and I have no way to create index.
Any suggestions?I open the remote connection.
Thanks,
Hugo.

Hello Hugo,
There are 2 ways out of this :
1. Either convert the Cluster Table to Transparent Table.
2. Enable Cluster Handling by setting P_CLU to Y. But in this case, you will have to set the parameter for all the 3 activities for VBUK i.e.
a) Fill Internal Header Table for Table VBUK (Initial) -
> TD05X_FILL_VBUK
b) Fill Internal Header Table for Table VBUK via Document Flow -
> TD05X_FILL_VBUK_1
c) Fill Internal Header Table for VBUK via Doc. Flow Predeces. -
> TD05X_FILL_VBUK_2
Then re-run the previous activities in the above order so that the cluster gets filled.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Suman

Similar Messages

Fill Internal Header Table for VBUK via Doc. Flow Predeces.

Good Day,
I'd executed the step Fill Internal Header Table for VBUK via Doc. Flow Predeces in System Analysis Phase. It has been running for the past 7 days. We know that the problem might be that the "update statistics" is not updated since Febraury this year, this table has 20 million records.
Is there a possibility or how or where to find how much time is left, how many records it has been analyzed for this activity?
Thanks in advanced.
Anatolii

Thank You very much dear colleagues for your advices and help!!!!!
I was able to resolve this problem with the following:
(as you told me before) Create standard M1 Index, in my case ZM1, with the field parameters VBEL, POSNV and VBELN ( MANDT it was not needed)
Using HINTS parameters from "Note 130480 - Database Hints in Open SQL for Oracle"
and changing the program: "CNV_TDMS_05_TI_I_CO_VBUK_2_C_N" in the sender system
before it was:
     %_HINTS ORACLE 'full(VBFA) parallel(VBFA, 4)'.   "#EC CI_NOFIRST
i was changed to:
      %_HINTS ORACLE 'INDEX("&TABLE&" "VBFA~ZM1" "VBFA^ZM1")'.   "#EC CI_NOFIRST
The Procedure finished successfully =)
With best regards,
                               Anatolii

Phase: Fill Internal Header Table for VBUK via Doc. Flow Predeces

Hi All
We currently have the phase Fill Internal Header Table for VBUK via Doc. Flow Predeces running on our TDMS system which creates the job JOB_TD05X_FILL_VBUK_2. I am assuming that it is examining table header details, my only concern it that the job has been running for 10 days and I am not sure what it is doing or if I should kill the process and start it again?
Does anyone have any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Phil

Hi Phil,
Have you created the index in VBFA suggested in oss note 1256679 ?
Unfortunatelly TDMS needs an index in VBFA by subsequent document.
Regards,
Rui Dantas

Taking long time filling the setup tables for sales and shipment

Hi ,
I am trying to fill the setup tables for sales and shipment and it is taking lot of time .
It took 16 hours just to bring 6 months of sales history data in the test environment .
Cn anybody help on this issue why it is taking that much of time ...
I am trying to load the sales data from R/3 into APO-BW from 2005 to 2007 .......
It is taking 16 hours to fill the data for only 6 months .

Hi,
1. delete data and refill the setuptables again by spliting to several small pieces.
2. compare the data. wht is the last Document numner in RSA3(Maximum one). Start from Maximum one. may be bit complex approch.
you need to check with PSA and base tables.
keep one thing in your mind you need to check againest MSEG and BSEG only. noy BKPF and MKPF.
correct if i'm wrong.
either refill or create a user exit to avoid duplicae records(you should have very good understanding of data, it will lead to inconsitent data for delta records).
User exit not a good solution. it's one possibility.
****Assign Points If Helpful****
Regards,
Ravikanth

Fill Internal Header Table for Table VBUK corrupted

Hi all
I had Cluster on each table ( VBUK, VBFCL... )
SP13 all need notes are implemented,
Parameter P_ROLL = 'X'
P_CUST = 'Y'
but system dumpt all 6 hours Remote error
one question does für VBUK fill also gave a Paramter p_full ?
thanks for feedback or other inputs
L

TDMS experts:
I remember that I indeed created an index for VBFA per that famous OSS note.
However because I have changed to a different project so that I cannot verify.
Additionally, this link also almost explicitly says that index on VBFA is feasible:
Re: Performance issue during TD05X_FILL_VBUK_2 and TIME OUT
So why in the previous posting Lou says:
1256679 -> VBFA is a cluster table, i can't create a Index ...
I appreciate if you experts can share your experience on this.
Regards!

Activity "Fill internal Header Table for Table JEST" canceled

Hi support,
When I run the process, canceled because it reaches the memory limit.
When the activity is running, note in the SM50 is reading cnvtdms_05_equi table, which has 240 million records, and also noted that when:
Memory (sum private) reaches to 2,000,000,000 bytes
Memory (sum) reaches 500,000,000
Memory (used) reaches 500,000,000
Memory (max.transaction) reaches 500,000,000
Memory (max.dialog step) reaches 500,000,000
canceled the process.
I also note that the "display file" of the SM50, wp = 10, there is a message that says: "SelMemClass: heap quota (Nondi) exceeded 2000000000 2000060272".
This confirms that the problem is that memory is not enough to read the entire table cnvtdms_05_equi.
I reviewed notes and I have activated and added P_ROLL_R and P_ROLL_W parameters for the activity.
I would appreciate your comments.
Hugo.

I had this issue. using transaction CNVMBTACTPAR set
TD05X_FILL_EQUI P_FULL = X
TD05X_FILL_EQUI_0 P_FULL = X
Regards.

Roll space error during Fill Header Table for EQUI

Hello. During ECC time slice copy, phase "Fill Header Table" for table EQUI, we are getting roll space memory error on the sender. The error is as described in SMP Note 1266386. However, as per the note it is fixed in DMIS_CNT SP10, we are at DMIS_CNT SP14. Our memory parameters are generous. We have opened up a customer message; in the mean time just wondering if anyone has come across this and fixed. Thanks,
Regards,
Shan

There is an OSS note (1273545) which is specially about SP14, SP13.
Did you go over that note?
Please let us know. Thanks!

Problem while filling the Setup Table for the DS 2LIS_02_SCL.

Hi All,
When I am trying to fill the Setup table for the DataSource 2LIS_02_SCL and only for one specific Purchase Order, it is showing me a message like
u201CDataSource 2LIS_02_ITM contains data still to be transferredu201D
I have deleted the Setup Table and I want to delete the entries from SM13, but I do not have Authorization.
Also, here I am trying to fill the Setup Table for 2LIS_02_SCL and not for 2LIS_02_ITM, but the message displayed above is showing as 2LIS_02_ITM DataSource. I think the Setup Table will be same for both the DataSources.
Waiting for your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
When you want to fill the setup tables first you need to delete setup tables to avoid the duplicate entires in setup tables ( you can delete the setup tables by using t.code LBWG with application no is 02)
In your case, the data souce is 2LIS_02_SCL for purchasing.
when you want to delete the setup tables by using t.code LBWG with 02 application no it will delete all the purchasing related data from all the data sources like
2LIS_02_SCL
2LIS_02_ITM
Before the deletion of setup tables you need to clear the delta Queues and stop the V3 jobs, which loads the data to Delta Queues (RSA7) and Update tables(LBWQ).
you need to run the V3 jobs manually by using LBWE > Job control > and schedule the jobs until the delta queues will get 0 records. that means no data will be available in RSA7 and LBWQ
go to SM37 to see the jobs LIS-BW-VB_APPLICATION_02,
once the delta queues gets 0 records by running V3 Jobs manullay.
Then remove the released state jobs > remove from schedule means delete the jobs in LBWE > Go to job control > you can delete the released jobs.
Becuase No postings to be done in application tables, while running setuptable filling you should take some down time to fill the setup tables.( OLI*BW) *=Application number.
Once you clear the Queues and delete the v3 jobs, then you need to fill the setup tables after deletion of setup tables.
once you fill the setup tables , by running intialization to BW side the delta Queue is formed for the data source in R3 side
Now the postings can be done in R3 side, so you need schedule back the V3 jobs, which you already delted from LBWE to load the data from application tables to RSA7 or LBWQ.
I hope this may help yoou.
Regards.
Rambabu
Edited by: Rambabu velanati on Jun 9, 2010 4:41 PM
Edited by: Rambabu velanati on Jun 9, 2010 4:52 PM

Error while filling set up tables for 2LIS_11 data sources

hello All ,
I tried to fill setup tables for 2LIS_11 data sources in OLI7BW , but the job RMCVENUA is getting cancelled. below is the Job Log ,
Job started
Step 001 started (program RMCVNEUA, variant &0000000000005, )
Start of order processing
Error determining rate: foreign curr. local curr. INR date 10.09.2008 (doc. 1)
Job cancelled
Is there any setting required in R3 side before filling setup tables of SD ?
I am able to fill the setup tables for 2LIS_05 ( Notifications) successfully.
Regards ,
Amol Kulkarni
Edited by: Amol Kulkarni on Dec 4, 2008 3:59 AM
Edited by: Amol Kulkarni on Dec 4, 2008 4:00 AM

Hi,
one of the sales document currencies is not maintained properly in the system and therefore its failing.
you need to correct those documents before filling the set up tables.
Either you can chose the option fault document toleration limit to 1000...so that 1000 records wrong records can be tolerated or you have to crrect it first before filling up the set up tables.
This will generally happen in test systems.... but very rare in production...so try to maintain currrency again in the system.
generally you will see the sales doc number in the error for which its failing.
May be at the time of filling some óne was working on some sales document and tried it save it.
correct that doc and fill the set up tables again.
Thanks
Ajeet

Error while filling set up table for Inventory

Hi,
While filling up setup table for Inventory, 2lis_03_bf, i get an error, Plant F041 doesnot exist. I am trying to fillup the table without any selections. Can anyone please suggest me a solution.
Thanks,
Praveen

Please check the following link:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328
Hope it helps you.

Why it takes long time to download and udates for iphone4

why it takes long time to download and updates for iphone4 ?

Class.forName("sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver");
Why do you need this if you are going to Oracle. Try
removing this. It might be trying things out with the
old driver and then moving to the new driver. This has nothing to do with it. (And it doesn't "try things out")
>
Also check your machines. They might be slow. There is
no reason, it should take more than few hundred
milliseconds to connect to a database on localhost as
your case is.Possible reasons...
- Network traffic
- Faulty router/gateway
- Busy server
- Faulty network card (either end)
- Conflict with another box

Header Table for G/L Code & Document Number related Fields

Hi,
Plz tell me the Header Table for the following Fields:---
G/L Code
Document Number
Doc. date
Posting Date
Vendor Code
Purchasing Document
Tax Code
Base Amount
Tax Amount
Vendor Inv. No.
Please note that i want Header Table not Line item tables...
Thanks...

BKPF

Can I use the time capsule internal hard drive for file storage?

Can I configure the Time Capsule internal HD to function as a network file server as well as handling time machine backups?
Can the internal HD be partitioned?

This is asked several times a day.. obviously people are struggling with their latest SSD being too small.
The TC is not suitable for network file server.. but many people having no choice press it into service as such.
It cannot be partitioned. It was and is and ever shall be a backup device for Time Machine.
Major issues.
1. No backup.. no way Time Machine can backup a network drive. No place to backup to.. So all your files will be at risk. And you will need to buy a third party like CCC to do backup.
2. The TC cannot be partitioned and mixing TM backups and data is not great.
3. The drive is slow to spin up and quick to spin down.. there is no controls.
4. iPhoto in particular can easily corrupt its entire library with wireless networking causing a disconnection to one photo. Even if you do this;;; do not move your photo library... you have been warned!!
5. iTunes will constantly lose connection to the library. The disk is too slow to respond.. itunes on the computer will constantly spit out errors. Even in the midst of streaming the TC can spin down the disk due to caching.
6. Do not use any live files on the TC no matter what else you do.. if you edit files in whatever program the file must be on the local hard disk.
7. The only suitable location for most libraries is a computer. You can plug in an external hard disk.
Read pondini for some work arounds.
Q3 here. http://pondini.org/TM/Time_Capsule.html

A long-time Arch user is looking for an alternative

Hello Arch users,
I know that this forum is probably not the best place to ask a question like that but I'll try anyways:
I have been using Archlinux for more than 5 years and I really like the simplicity and the Arch philosophy. However, as I cannot afford to devote a lot of time to maintaining my work station (which Archlinux naturally requires if one relies on a bunch of AUR packages) I have swapped to OS X around a year ago. Please no OS X bashing here, both systems have their advantages and disadvantages which shall be discussed at another place.
I noticed that for certain tasks a proper Linux is still very handy. Up to now I was just using my former Archlinux notebook every now and then. This means that it occurs that I will not use my Linux box for a couple of months, possibly even a year. With that I get into trouble keeping my system up to date with the rolling release philosophy (due to the huge gaps between two consecutive updates).
So what I basically want is the Arch-experience without the rolling release feature. It appeared to me that there might possibly be some long-term archive available, where all packages are just available for a long time. If not, can you suggest any other distributions that require little maintenance and are as close to Arch as possible? I really do not want to miss pacman, however, if there is no other way I'd need to install some long-term support Ubuntu...
Thanks a lot
Last edited by minus (2013-11-23 09:50:05)

Thanks for every single reply. It seems I am slowly approaching my best-fit distro
@andjeng:
ARM sounds interesting, but two potential problems come to my mind: 1) as described in the wiki, the original ARM has already been closed, if that happens again I won't have a repository and a lot of maintenance work is to be issued. 2) If I will just set my mirrorlist to a fixed date I will not be able to get any security updates (also, see my reply to vostok4).
@vostok4:
The problem is that packages in AUR usually require the latest versions of some libraries, so just not applying updates is not possible (that was my first go when I replaced my Arch notebook with a Mac, now it is still being unused as Arch does not work anymore and I don't want to bother fixing the outdated system).
@ANOKNUSA:
The tasks I need linux for can be anything, such as being able to read/write/format/re-partition any of my old harddrives or using/compiling software that is available for linux only (or is more stable on linux).
What I mean by "Arch-experience" is that I can use a simple and powerful package manager like pacman and I can find nearly every thinkable package in AUR (if not, I can create it on my own without a lot of trouble due to the makepkg system). Furthermore, I enjoy(ed) the simplicity (a single configuration file rc.conf where I could configure most of the general system settings, at least before the move to systemd has been carried out, which I dislike as I never had the patience to learn systemd and get the hang of it). When Arch was my only system I also liked that the installation has created a naked linux on my drive that I needed to put clothes on. I guess with converting to a casual linux user I now prefer something that is already ready to use (but I still want to be able to change the clothes).
I will have a look at CRUX and Darwin as you have suggested.
I agree that a well-organised filesystem is very important. However, even if one applies the theory meticulously (which I usually don't as I have other priorities when working), the possibility of opening a file without having to click through the folders in a file explorer (or typing the filepath in the terminal) has eased my workflow. I will read your link after I have posted this, though.
@drcouzelis:
I have had a look at the Arch-based distros but I think none of them are really what I want (which is a LTS version of Archlinux ). I think I might try out a LTS Mint as soon as I have assembled my new computer.
@teateawhy:
I have not used Debian yet, but as far as I understand the release cycles are quite short and there is no LTS of particular releases. In your opinion, why is Debian closer to Arch than the other suggestions?
Last edited by minus (2013-11-23 22:06:04)

Header table for service contract like CRMD_DHR_HEADOPP

Hi,
As we can get all the details from CRMD_ORDERADM_H and CRMD_ORDERADM_I, table for the business transactions, along with this for the opportunity and lead we also have the header table as CRMD_DHR_HEADOPP and CRMD_DHR_LEAD, from which we can directly select the prospect and employee responsible. Now we are working with Service/Sales quotation and contract, for this Is there any header level table from where we can get the details for prospect and employee responsible.without using the CCRMD_ORDER_INDEX table.
Regards,
Zafar

Hello Zafar,
I such cases I use the BOL-model to get the data. To find out your relevant BOL-entities go to the right WebUI screen and press F2. Then you see the application, view and context node and you can find out which BOL-entity you need.
Best regards,
Thomas Wagner

Long Time: Fill Internal Header Table for VBUK via Doc. Flow Predeces

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for