Long time for creation of materialized view

Hi,
we are trying to create a materialized view and this view would contain 1 lakh records and around 50 columns.
The select statement to get these records takes only 1-2 sec whereas the actual creation of view takes 17 minutes. The database used is Oracle 8i. The code used is
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW employee_master_t
PCTFREE 10
STORAGE (initial 500k next 500k pctincrease 0)
REFRESH WITH ROWID COMPLETE START WITH SYSDATE
NEXT SYSDATE + 1 AS select * from table_name
Is it because the insert is slow and temp tablespace may have to be increased?
also, can anyone pls suggest if fast refresh mode can be used with Oracle 8i since currently we are not able to create as error saying that query is complex is returned

It will be possible to create a Materialised view with up to 20 tables, but you have to understand the restrictions on complex Materialised views with regards to fast refresh.
To help your understanding, refer to Materialized View Concepts and Architecture
<br>
Oracle Database FAQs
</br>

Similar Messages

Longer time for Material Availability check while creation of prd order.

Hi guys,
I am facing a weird problem while creating production orders thru CO01.
I enter the component and plant and I am also using the forward scheduling option.
for some reason, SAP is taking a long time for material availability check when I hit the release button.
Sometimes its taking more than an hour. Its happening with few specific BOM's, and I have checked the master data but I could hardly find a problem in master data.
Can someone suggest me some tips ??
Thanks & Regards,
Sashivardhan

Hi,
Please check the Availability check control maintained for Components it should be 01 or 02. Also check the issue storage location maintained or not. You can maintain issue storage location in BOM in Status/lng text tab in Production Storage Location.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Navin

Creation of materialized view

Hi All,
We had created some other materialized view with for small set of data. The materialized view name is ‘XXCA_PAGL_RECON_GL1_TRANS_MV’ and it has created a table with the same name.
What I am unable to understand is that the new table which was created by the system during the creation of materialized view is in VALID state but the materialized view is in INVALID state.
Please help me to understand this process.
Thanks in advance
Venkatesh

The column dba_objects.status for mviews is set to INVALID when the base tables are updated. See Metalink note 454552.1. It is normal.
Edited by: YasinBaskan on Feb 17, 2009 2:07 PM

Impdp taking long time for only few MBs data...

Hi All,
I have one query related to impdp. I have one expdp file and size is 47M. When I restore this dmp using impdp it will take more time. Also initially table_data loaded finsih very fast but then later on alter function/procedure/view taking a lot time almost 4 to 5 hrs.
I have no idea why its taking long time... Earlier I can see one DB link is failed and it given error for "TNS name could not resolved" so I create DB link also before run impdp but the same result. Can any one suggest what could be the cause to taking long time for only 47MB data?
Note - Both expdp and impdp database version is 11.2.0.3.0. If I import the same dmp file into 11.2.0.1.0 then its done in few mins.
Thanks...

Also Read
Checklist For Slow Performance Of DataPump Export (expdp) And Import (impdp) [ID 453895.1]
DataPump Import (IMPDP) is Very Slow at Object/System/Role Grants, Default Roles [ID 1267951.1]

Taking too long time for booting

Hi there,
I just bought myself an iphone 5s. . Try to get up started for the 1st time but the thing keep booting or loading too long time for endless hours. What may go wrong? Appreciate if you could help me on this.

But payment run before due date. you are not run before due date once check it

Creation of Materialized view and Materialized view log.

I wanted to create materialized view with 'REFRESH FAST ON COMMIT' option.
1) Table1 --it is partitioned range + list -- Added primary key
2) view1   -- having primary keys on view's base table
Steps:
1) create materialized view log on Table1 ; -- default primary key
2) create materialized view log on view1. --- It is giving below error.
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
i wanted to create Materialized view like below
create materialized view
REFRESH fast ON commit
as
select ...
... from table1
where c1 in (select c1 from view1 where ... );
Question:
1) As i am getting above error while creating MV log on view. Can we create MV log on view or we have to create MV log on view base table?
2) To create MV with ''REFRESH FAST ON COMMIT' option , do we need to have primary key on master tables?
Any pointers on this will really helpful.
Thanks
Prasad

Also created MV LOG on 3 tables and tried with joins ..
create materialized view
REFRESH fast ON commit
as
select ...
... from table1 , tab2 t2,tab3 t3
where ....
and ...
Get same error ORA-12052: cannot fast refresh materialized view AVSYS.EVENT_LOG_MV
2052. 00000 - "cannot fast refresh materialized view %s.%s"
*Cause:    Either ROWIDs of certain tables were missing in the definition or
           the inner table of an outer join did not have UNIQUE constraints on
           join columns.
*Action:   Specify the FORCE or COMPLETE option. If this error is got
           during creation, the materialized view definition may have be
           changed. Refer to the documentation on materialized views.

Transaction code for Creation of Material

Hi Code Guru's,
can any one please tell me the Transaction code for creation of material.
regards,
Syed Khutubuddin.
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 14, 2008 4:45 PM

Hi syed,
Goto T.code MM01 then create Material name,
MM02 is change Material name,
MM03 is display Material name.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Cheers,
S.Suresh.
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Apr 14, 2008 4:46 PM

Takes a long time for Apple logo to show up on boot up

My 13" mpb early 2011 takes a long time for the Apple logo to show up... Is there a way to fix this? (It should show up within 2 seconds after the initial chime)
I have Win7 installed, could it be that? Since it might be detecting which partition to boot up with.

Check login items ...
Remove all items from System Preferences > Users & Groups > Login Items
Same for HD > Library > StartupItems
Then restart your Mac to test.
Not necessarily a Windows issue.
*** When you post for help, please state which OS X is installed.
If you aren't sure, click About this Mac from your Apple menu 
Troubleshooting advice can depend on that information.

Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours

Hi ,
Query taking long time for EXTRACTING the data more than 24 hours please find the query and explain plan details below even indexes avilable on table's goe's to FULL TABLE SCAN. please suggest me.......
SQL> explain plan for select a.account_id,round(a.account_balance,2) account_balance,
2 nvl(ah.invoice_id,ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
to_char(ah.effective_start_date,'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date,
to_date('30-12-9999','dd-mm-yyyy')),'DD-MON-YYYY')
due_date, ah.current_balance-ah.previous_balance amount,
decode(ah.invoice_id,null,'A','I') transaction_type
3 4 5 6 7 8 from account a,account_history ah,invoice i_+
where a.account_id=ah.account_id
and a.account_type_id=1000002
and round(a.account_balance,2) > 0
and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
and ah.invoice_id=i.invoice_id(+)
AND a.account_balance > 0
order by a.account_id,ah.effective_start_date desc; 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Explained.
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 544K| 30M| | 693K (20)|
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 544K| 30M| 75M| 693K (20)|
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 544K| 30M| | 689K (20)|
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCOUNT | 20080 | 294K| | 6220 (18)|
|* 4 | HASH JOIN OUTER | | 131M| 5532M| 5155M| 678K (20)|
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| ACCOUNT_HISTORY | 131M| 3646M| | 197K (25)|
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| INVOICE | 262M| 3758M| | 306K (18)|
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("A"."ACCOUNT_ID"="AH"."ACCOUNT_ID")
3 - filter("A"."ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID"=1000002 AND "A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE">0 AND
ROUND("A"."ACCOUNT_BALANCE",2)>0)
4 - access("AH"."INVOICE_ID"="I"."INVOICE_ID"(+))
5 - filter("AH"."CURRENT_BALANCE">"AH"."PREVIOUS_BALANCE" AND ("AH"."INVOICE_ID"
IS NOT NULL OR "AH"."ADJUSTMENT_ID" IS NOT NULL))
22 rows selected.
Index Details:+_
SQL> select INDEX_OWNER,INDEX_NAME,COLUMN_NAME,TABLE_NAME from dba_ind_columns where
2 table_name in ('INVOICE','ACCOUNT','ACCOUNT_HISTORY') order by 4;
INDEX_OWNER INDEX_NAME COLUMN_NAME TABLE_NAME
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT CUSTOMER_NODE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_ACCOUNT_TYPE ACCOUNT_TYPE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_PREVIOUS_INVOICE PREVIOUS_INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_NAME ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_ACCOUNT_NAME_ID ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_ACCOUNT LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_INVOICE_ACCOUNT INVOICE_ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ACCOUNT SEQNR ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_INVOICE INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA CURRENT_BALANCE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA INVOICE_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_CIA ACCOUNT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_LMOD LAST_MODIFIED ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADINV ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_PAYMENT PAYMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_ADJUSTMENT ADJUSTMENT_ID ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_ACCOUNT_HISTORY_APPLIED_DT APPLIED_DATE ACCOUNT_HISTORY
OPS$SVM_SRV4 P_INVOICE INVOICE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE CUSTOMER_INVOICE_STR INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_LAST_MODIFIED_INVOICE LAST_MODIFIED INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT ACCOUNT_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 U_INVOICE_ACCOUNT BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_BILL_RUN BILL_RUN_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_INVOICE_TYPE INVOICE_TYPE_ID INVOICE
OPS$SVM_SRV4 I_INVOICE_CUSTOMER_NODE CUSTOMER_NODE_ID INVOICE
32 rows selected.
Regards,
Bathula
Oracle-DBA

I have some suggestions. But first, you realize that you have some redundant indexes, right? You have an index on account(account_name) and also account(account_name, account_id), and also account_history(invoice_id) and account_history(invoice_id, adjustment_id). No matter, I will suggest some new composite indexes.
Also, you do not need two lines for these conditions:
and round(a.account_balance, 2) > 0
AND a.account_balance > 0
You can just use: and a.account_balance >= 0.005
So the formatted query isselect a.account_id,
       round(a.account_balance, 2) account_balance,
       nvl(ah.invoice_id, ah.adjustment_id) transaction_id,
       to_char(ah.effective_start_date, 'DD-MON-YYYY') transaction_date,
       to_char(nvl(i.payment_due_date, to_date('30-12-9999', 'dd-mm-yyyy')),
               'DD-MON-YYYY') due_date,
       ah.current_balance - ah.previous_balance amount,
       decode(ah.invoice_id, null, 'A', 'I') transaction_type
from account a, account_history ah, invoice i
where a.account_id = ah.account_id
   and a.account_type_id = 1000002
   and (ah.invoice_id is not null or ah.adjustment_id is not null)
   and ah.CURRENT_BALANCE > ah.previous_balance
   and ah.invoice_id = i.invoice_id(+)
   AND a.account_balance >= .005
order by a.account_id, ah.effective_start_date desc;You will probably want to select:
1. From ACCOUNT first (your smaller table), for which you supply a literal on account_type_id. That should limit the accounts retrieved from ACCOUNT_HISTORY
2. From ACCOUNT_HISTORY. We want to limit the records as much as possible on this table because of the outer join.
3. INVOICE we want to access last because it seems to be least restricted, it is the biggest, and it has the outer join condition so it will manufacture rows to match as many rows as come back from account_history.
Try the query above after creating the following composite indexes. The order of the columns is important:create index account_composite_i on account(account_type_id, account_balance, account_id);
create index acct_history_comp_i on account_history(account_id, invoice_id, adjustment_id, current_balance, previous_balance, effective_start_date);
create index invoice_composite_i on invoice(invoice_id, payment_due_date);All the columns used in the where clause will be indexed, in a logical order suited to the needs of the query. Plus each selected column is indexed as well so that we should not need to touch the tables at all to satisfy the query.
Try the query after creating these indexes.
A final suggestion is to try larger sort and hash area sizes and a manual workarea policy.alter session set workarea_size_policy = manual;
alter session set sort_area_size = 2147483647;
alter session set hash_area_size = 2147483647;

My folders take forever to open and then the docs within take a long time for the icon to pop up. the same thing with moving itmes from the desktop to a folder, and also emptying the trashh

my folders take forever to open and then the docs within take a long time for the icon to pop up. the same thing with moving itmes from the desktop to a folder, and also emptying the trashh

Don't know if that would be a failing hard drive, but it may be that you are out of available space. How much hard drive space do you have available? Please highlight the Macintosh HD icon and then press Command and I for a get info window. Once open, please copy and post the following:
Capacity:
Used:
Available:
Mac OS requires a minimum of 10 - 15% of total hard drive space available and empty at all times in order to operate properly.

My lap top is extremly slow. It studders. It kind of sounds like there is a fan inside and it constantly stopping and starting. And, it takes a really long time for it too start up. Whats wrong with it?

My lap top is extremly slow. It studders. It kind of sounds like there is a fan inside and it constantly stopping and starting. And, it takes a really long time for it too start up. Whats wrong with it?

Do you have current backups?
Those symptoms could indicate a failing Hard drive. If it dies, all your documents go with it unless you have Backups.
I have had very good luck with physical and battery problem diagnosis at the Genius Bar. Those guys put their hands (and their ears) to these machines, all day every day, and they know immediately what all those sounds mean.
Your appointment for an evaluation is FREE, in warranty or out.

Takes long time for shutdown after adding to domain

Hi,
Workstation OS - Window 7
Domain Controller OS - Window server 2008 R2 standard
Following thing i have measure with Stopwatch.
1) When the laptop is in workgroup, it takes just 17 second for shutdown.
2) when i added the same laptop in domain ( corp.abc.com ), now it takes 1minutes and 22 second for shutdown. ( it just show shutting down screen )
Why the shutdown time increased so much?
Do you have any idea?
Note:- i have not make any changes in laptop, nor added any software. I have done the above testing because user start complaining that after putting laptop in domain it takes long time for shutdown. It's happening to all laptop where the OS is window 7
There is no logoff scripts / gpo's as well as we don't have roaming profiles.
Please advice.
Thanks & Regards,
Param
www.paramgupta.blogspot.com

Hi,
To troubleshooting this issue, please install Windows Performance Tools (WPT) Kit. The Windows Performance Tools (WPT) Kit contains performance analysis tools, and is designed for analysis of a wide range of performance problems including application start
times, boot issues, deferred procedure calls and interrupt activity (DPCs and ISRs), system responsiveness issues, application resource usage, and interrupt storms.
To get the installer, you have to install the Windows 7 SDK.
Microsoft Windows SDK for Windows 7 and .NET Framework 3.5 SP1
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=3138
For shutdown tracing:
Run command:
xbootmgr -trace shutdown -noPrepReboot -traceFlags BASE+CSWITCH+DRIVERS+POWER -resultPath C:\TEMP
Collect logs and post them for further troubleshooting.
For more information please refer to following MS articles:
Long Shutdown Time on Windows 7 Ultimate x64
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itproperf/thread/11a42a93-efd2-4184-9ce8-bbc1438b7ea6
Long shutdown time on Windows 7 64 bit laptop
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/w7itproperf/thread/4440fc6e-c81e-440c-9183-9b7e176729d2
Lawrence
TechNet Community Support

HT4759 Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why

Hello .. I've been subscribed for ic;oud for 20$ per year and I found it useless for many reasons: that I can not disconnect my mobile while the uploading process and it takes long time for uploading my data .. Its not a reliable system that's why I need to deactivate the space service and take my money back .. Thanks

The "issues" you've raised are nothing to do with the iCloud service.
No service that uploads data allows you to disconnect the device you are uploading from while uploading data. Doing so would prevent the upload from completing. It is a basic requirement for any uploading service that you remain connected to it for uploading to be possible.
The time it takes to upload data to iCloud is entirely dependent on how fast your Internet connection is, and how much data you are uploading. Both of these things are completely out of Apple's control. Whichever upload service you use will be affected by the speed of your Internet connection.

Bex Reports takes long time for filtering

Hi,
We have gone live in last December.And already our inventory cube contains some 15 million records,sales cube contains 12 million records.
Is there any specific limit to number of records.Because while doing filtering in inventory report or sales reports it is taking very long time.
Is there any alternative or we should delete some the data from the cube.
for filtering any value it is taking long time than running the query itself.
Pls help...
Regards,
viren.

Hi Viren,
I hope a cube can perform well even at 100 million records with some performance tunning. So i absolutely doubt why it is taking long time for your cube with just 10-15 million records.
Do a performance analysis and check whether aggregates will be helpful or not.
Check the below link for how to do a performance analysis.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/media/uuid/d9fd84ad-0701-0010-d9a5-ba726caa585d
Hope it helps.
Thx,
Soumya

Take long time for loading

Hi Experts,
One of my data target (Data comming from another ODS) is taking long time for loading, basically it takes below 10 times only, but today it is running from last 40 minesu2026
In Status Tab it showing....
Job termination in source system
Diagnosis
The background job for data selection in the source system has been terminated. It is very likely that a short dump has been logged in the source system
Procedure
Read the job log in the source system. Additional information is displayed here.
To access the job log, use the monitor wizard (step-by-step analysis) or the menu path <LS>Environment -> Job Overview -> In Source System
Error correction:
Follow the instructions in the job log messages.
Can anyone please solve my problem.
Thanks in advance
David

Hi Experts,
Thanks for your answers, and my load failed when the data comes from one ODS to another ODS. find the below job log
Job started
Step 001 started (program SBIE0001, variant &0000000007169, user ID RCREMOTE)
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 2 in task 0001 (0 parallel tasks)
DATASOURCE = 8ZPP_OP3
         Current Values for Selected Profile Parameters               *
abap/heap_area_nondia......... 20006838008                             *
abap/heap_area_total.......... 20006838008                             *
abap/heaplimit................ 83886080                                *
zcsa/installed_languages...... ED                                      *
zcsa/system_language.......... E                                       *
ztta/max_memreq_MB............ 2047                                    *
ztta/roll_area................ 5000000                                 *
ztta/roll_extension........... 4294967295                              *
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 1 in task 0002 (1 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:31:55, End = 06.09.2010 01:31:55
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 3 in task 0003 (1 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 2 in task 0004 (2 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:00, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:00
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 4 in task 0005 (2 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 3 in task 0006 (3 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:04, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:04
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 5 in task 0007 (3 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 4 in task 0008 (4 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:08, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:08
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 6 in task 0009 (4 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 5 in task 0010 (5 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:11, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:11
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 7 in task 0011 (5 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 13 in task 0026 (6 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:01, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:44, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:45
tRFC: Data Package = 8, TID = 0AEB465C00AE4C847CEA0070, Duration = 00:00:17,
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:29, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:46
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 15 in task 0027 (5 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 14 in task 0028 (6 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:48, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:48
tRFC: Data Package = 9, TID = 0AEB465C00AE4C847CEF0071, Duration = 00:00:18,
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:33, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:51
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 16 in task 0029 (5 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 15 in task 0030 (6 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:52, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:52
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 17 in task 0031 (6 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 16 in task 0032 (7 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 10, TID = 0AEB465C00684C847CF30070, Duration = 00:00:18,
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:37, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:55
tRFC: Data Package = 11, TID = 0AEB465C02E14C847CF70083, Duration = 00:00:17,
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:42, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:59
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:56, End = 06.09.2010 01:32:56
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 18 in task 0033 (5 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 17 in task 0034 (6 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:33:00, End = 06.09.2010 01:33:00
tRFC: Data Package = 12, TID = 0AEB465C00AE4C847CFB0072, Duration = 00:00:16,
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:32:46, End = 06.09.2010 01:33:02
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 19 in task 0035 (5 parallel tasks)
Call customer enhancement EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 (CMOD) with 100,000 records
Result of customer enhancement: 100,000 records
Asynchronous send of data package 18 in task 0036 (6 parallel tasks)
tRFC: Data Package = 0, TID = , Duration = 00:00:00, ARFCSTATE =
tRFC: Start = 06.09.2010 01:33:04, End = 06.09.2010 01:33:04
Asynchronous transmission of info IDoc 20 in task 0037 (6 parallel tasks)
ABAP/4 processor: DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR
Job cancelled
Thanks
Daivd
Edited by: david Rathod on Sep 6, 2010 12:04 PM

Long time for creation of materialized view

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for