Long time launching the WAD 7.0
Dear gurus,
Every time I launch WAD7.0 I get a window with message:
BI metadata for system <SID> in language EN is outdated or not yet installed ...
Then It downloads several minutes and the WAD is launched.
did anyone experience this ? know how to solve it ?
Please advice,
Dimitry haritonov
Edited by: Dimitry Haritonov on Dec 26, 2007 5:32 PM
Can you try contacting your Basis administrator.
Because itseems while upgrading the lates support package and Stack it might have corrupted something in WAd.
I use to have some issue while launching WAD and it always starts downloading but it never gave me error as of EN is not available or so.
Try to show the issue to your Basis admin and he/she will help u sort the Version.
It seems the version of ur WAD or the software is corrupted, nothing else.
Similar Messages
-
I am trying to do a full Time Machine Backup to a new external disk. The backup starts, and it says "Time remaining about 4 days." That seems like a very long time, but the real problem is that the computer "logs off" after a few hours, and the backup stops. The system preferences are set to "Never" for Computer sleep and Display sleep. The computer does not ordinarily log off automatically, but it has done this twice since I started the Time Machine backup.
If you have more than one user account, these instructions must be carried out as an administrator.
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
Make sure the title of the Console window is All Messages. If it isn't, select All Messages from the SYSTEM LOG QUERIES menu on the left. If you don't see that menu, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar.
Enter the word "Starting" (without the quotes) in the String Matching text field. You should now see log messages with the words "Starting * backup," where * represents any of the words "automatic," "manual," or "standard." Note the timestamp of the last such message. Clear the text field and scroll back in the log to that time. Select the messages timestamped from then until the end of the backup, or the end of the log if that's not clear. Copy them (command-C) to the Clipboard. Paste (command-V) into a reply to this message.
If all you see are messages that contain the word "Starting," you didn't clear the search box.
If there are runs of repeated messages, post only one example of each. Don't post many repetitions of the same message.
When posting a log extract, be selective. Don't post more than is requested.
Please do not indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Some personal information, such as the names of your files, may be included — anonymize before posting. -
I have a very old (by computer standards) MacBook Pro, and a newer one. I've been using the old one mostly for iTunes, into which I have only CD entries. For a long time, years, the old MacBook pro ceased entering the song titles. This is very time consuming for me, so I finally investigated a bit further.
I discovered how to enter the track titles onto my newer MacBook Pro, and was so pleased! But when I tried to do the same with the other laptop, it failed.
What I did, basically, was what the Apple Help suggested--choose iTunes General Preferences, etc.etc. And yes, I did upgrade the old laptop to the newest iTunes version.
Am I just wasting my time here? Is there some reason why an older Mac Pro will not do what the newer one will, with regard to iTunes?
My older laptop is a 2.6 GHz Core Duo; it has 36 GB of "memory available." The newer one a 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7. It has 284 GB of memory available.
Both are using the same version of Snow Leopard--10.6.8.I have a very old (by computer standards) MacBook Pro, and a newer one. I've been using the old one mostly for iTunes, into which I have only CD entries. For a long time, years, the old MacBook pro ceased entering the song titles. This is very time consuming for me, so I finally investigated a bit further.
I discovered how to enter the track titles onto my newer MacBook Pro, and was so pleased! But when I tried to do the same with the other laptop, it failed.
What I did, basically, was what the Apple Help suggested--choose iTunes General Preferences, etc.etc. And yes, I did upgrade the old laptop to the newest iTunes version.
Am I just wasting my time here? Is there some reason why an older Mac Pro will not do what the newer one will, with regard to iTunes?
My older laptop is a 2.6 GHz Core Duo; it has 36 GB of "memory available." The newer one a 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7. It has 284 GB of memory available.
Both are using the same version of Snow Leopard--10.6.8. -
my folders take forever to open and then the docs within take a long time for the icon to pop up. the same thing with moving itmes from the desktop to a folder, and also emptying the trashh
Don't know if that would be a failing hard drive, but it may be that you are out of available space. How much hard drive space do you have available? Please highlight the Macintosh HD icon and then press Command and I for a get info window. Once open, please copy and post the following:
Capacity:
Used:
Available:
Mac OS requires a minimum of 10 - 15% of total hard drive space available and empty at all times in order to operate properly. -
Validate/madatory in order to avoid long time for the program execution.
Below is my selction screen. I would like to do validations for specific fields to make them mandatory fields as well.
Could you please suggeste me what are the fields that I can validate/madatory in order to avoid long time for the program run.
*Program selections
SELECTION-SCREEN : BEGIN OF BLOCK b1 WITH FRAME TITLE text-h01.
SELECT-OPTIONS : o_as4loc FOR v_as4local,
o_ddlang FOR ddlanguage,
o_vkorg FOR vkorg MEMORY ID vko,
o_auart FOR auart MEMORY ID aat,
o_fdnam FOR fdnam,
o_spart FOR spart MEMORY ID spa,
o_vbeln FOR vbeln MEMORY ID aun,
o_posnr FOR posnr,
o_matnr FOR matnr MEMORY ID mat,
o_pltyp FOR pltyp MEMORY ID vpl,
o_j_3ar FOR j_3arqda,
o_kzr00 FOR kbetr, " -ZR00
o_kalsm FOR kalsmasd,
o_kmwst FOR kbetr, " -MWST
o_kbmen FOR kbmeng,
o_land1 FOR land1 MEMORY ID LND
SELECTION-SCREEN : END OF BLOCK b1.
Thanks in advance.Hi,
Make key fields as well as fields on which there in an index in the database table mandatory.
Regards,
Abhijit G. Borkar -
I purchaised MPV's Core Numbers '09 101 software online yesterday. The software only shows the toutorial, and I couldn't find the actual spread sheet. I have taken a long time watching the toutorial. Please help me on how I can find the actual spread sheet to work on. Thank you in advance
Visit the developer site for help.
https://www.appomator.com/support/ -
during last weeks, from time to time, when I connect my macbook it stays long time with the color wheel turning around. Finally I have to hard-reset. Any clue?
It's Mac OS X 10.7.3It's Mac OS X 10.7.3
The startup disk may need repairing.
Use Lion Recovery for that. -
i buy my iphone used from long time put the passward and i cloud still the old and know by mestake delete to open the mobile they ask about the i cloud and passward how can i open and any information u want i can send to u
See the section titled "What if I purchase a device that is still linked to the previous owner's account" in the following link. It describes your only option. http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5818
-
Hyperion System 9.3.1 reports taking longer time for the very first time
We are on Hyperion System 9.3.1. The Financial reports are taking longer time (like 2 to 3 minuter) for the very first time for each login. The subsequest reports are does work faster.
The behaviour is same for the Production and Development environments.
All the reporting services have given enough JVM heap size.
FYI, Reporting and Workspace runngin on the same server. Workspace/Reporting are clusted in two servers. HFM app is running on different server. HFM web is on different server. Shared Services is also on running on different server.
Any help would be greately appreciated.
Thanks.The reason they run quicker the subsequent times, is because the data has already been cached in the system.
You could try the usual tricks to speed the report up:
- move items into POV
- have children and parent in the same row
- arrange dimensions in inverse outline order
- remove excessive formatting
- push report calculations back to the data source
We have found that using lots of dynamically calculated members also slows down reports, so try and limit the number of these.
Hope this helps. If not maybe give us an idea of how the report is created to see if other changes could be made. -
Long time for the replication tables in Hana
Hi Gurus,
We are replicating some tables in Hana these being Standard (AFPO) and Customer Table.
We have two tables being already replicated to 3 days and not over yet.
The replication takes so long?
Thanks !
In other words and in order to try to be clearer:
we are replicating standard tables (AFPO, …) and one z-table in HANA, but this process is spending a long long time (more than 4 days and this process has not been finished yet). We are working at QAS. Is this duration correct? What can we do to improve it? We appreciate if you have any suggestions like portitioning scheme/parallel loads.
Standard tables: around 1.000.000
Z-Table: around 1000 ecords
Thanks in advance. Regards.Hi Gurus,
We are replicating some tables in Hana these being Standard (AFPO) and Customer Table.
We have two tables being already replicated to 3 days and not over yet.
The replication takes so long?
Thanks !
In other words and in order to try to be clearer:
we are replicating standard tables (AFPO, …) and one z-table in HANA, but this process is spending a long long time (more than 4 days and this process has not been finished yet). We are working at QAS. Is this duration correct? What can we do to improve it? We appreciate if you have any suggestions like portitioning scheme/parallel loads.
Standard tables: around 1.000.000
Z-Table: around 1000 ecords
Thanks in advance. Regards. -
Crystal report from MSC taking long time for the first time
Hello Friends,
I have a report designed in Crystal Reports to display the BP details. It is giving some performance issues. In the analysis it is found that it is taking long time immediately after i restart the machine. From the next time it is not that worse.
If anybody is facing the same performance issue while using the crystal reports, kindly let me know the reasons for this. I would like to know the ways to increse the performance.
Thanks for all your support.
Best regards,
Swarna SeetaHello Swarna
Reporting is quiet a heavy component which interacts with many other dlls.
What happens when you say generate report from the mobile application for the first time, UI Framework knows that it is a reporting call and it will instantiate Reporting Manager. Reporting Manager is the single point of contact for the entire reporting functionality. During the initialization of reporting manager,
it needs to instantiate all other working components like Error Hanlder, Data handler, Resoure component and crystal reports etc..Resource component is a COM component and so there will be lot of Marshallign/Unmanrshalling from Dotnet calls. Since all these sub components are singleton classes, initialized only once for the first time and reuse the same instance in the subsequent attempts.
Hope I had made it bit clear
Best Regards
Shankar -
Oracle resultset.last() will cost long time while the resultset is large
we want to get the count of returned resultset rows through used last() & getRowNum() of oracle resultset . But this way the oracle driver will cache all rows in memory of our local machine and cost long time . we thought the resultset maybe cost many time on network.
can i set any preferences,make rs.last don't transfer by network and the last() method only work in DB server.
how to solve the problem.
thanks so much~!No. The way Oracle cursors work, the only way to find out how many rows are in a ResultSet is to fetch each row. Since cursors are read-only structures, the driver has to cache the result if it is going to allow you to retrieve the data without re-executing the query. Increasing your fetch size may decrease the amount of time required to fetch all the rows, but you'll still have to go through all that effort.
One alternative would be to add a COUNT(*) (or more generically COUNT(*) OVER ()) to the query and use that value (which will be repeated for every row in the result) to determine how many rows are being returned.
Justin -
Cache entry created a long time after the report runs
We have a report that results in more than 300,000 records. We get the results for the report in quick time but the cache entry gets created only after sometime, say around 30 mins later or so. Any idea why this delay? Is it that the report caches 25 records at a time (default no. of rows per page) and shows them in quick time and the rest of the records are getting cached in the background? Is there like a way we can optimize this?
did you check how much time the entire report takes to execute (evn though the first 25 rows comes up quickly). I suspect it is > 30 mins.
OBIEE is not meant as a data dump tool and there is little that could be done. (except better hardware) -
Takes a long time for the status of the dshboard to go from unknown to display the information
been trouble shooting a issue with this server where its running fine for a few weeks then it will slow down shares will stop working or print services, eventually has to reboot it, a few times it wouldn't reboot and would just hang and had to be hard shut
down.
ran through diagnostics with Dell and Dset tool they didn't see anything wrong, we updated a few things and did the offline diag from the boot up and found a RAM issue, we pulled the ram out blew out the slots plugged it back in and everything has been fine.
but seems like there is some of the issues creeping back in, Dell says its not hardware so looking at OS issues
its a 2012 std server Power edge R520 Xeon E5-2420 with 32 gigs of ram, its a file server print server AD, only server for this construction company of about 20 users.
when ever I load up the server manager it shows for about 5 min or longer unknown for everything, after 5-10 min some things fill in till its full, also the Volume shadow copy service keeps stopping and flagging it red in the server manager. have run sfc
and not really seeing what could be wrong, everything shows fine,
have not had any complaints about speed or not being able to access the shares since we did the downtime and reset the ram in the slots but when I even try to get to something like updates from control panel it takes about 15 min or so for the application
to load up, but other things are fast like normal, its somewhat selective.
any ideas?
thank you!
Brandon DillonHi Brandon Dillon,
On current situation, please logon the server and open Server Manager. Then navigate to BEST PRACTIES ANALYZER and start BPA Scan. Please monitor the result. Meanwhile, please check
if find some events which may be related to this issue. Those may help us to go further analyze.
In addition, please
perform a clean boot on the server. Then open Server Manager and check if this issue still exists.
If any update, please feel free to l tem know.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu -
Wait step taking longer time than the defined wait time
Hi,
We have very simple BPM with 3 steps: Receive, Wait and Send.
Wait step has following parameters:
Type: Wait Specified Time Period
Duration: 1
Unit: Minutes
From the above parameters idelly it should wait only for 60 sec and start the next step which is send step. But Wait step is taking following times: 1m 09s,1m 40s, 3m 40s, 1m 41s, 2m 10s, 2m 16s, 2m 46s, 1m 09s, 1m 40s, 3m 39s
Does anyone know what could be the reason for above longer wait time??
Thx
N@v!nHi Naveen,
How did you measure these times? Tha additional time might be because of the message processing time included or size of the message is bigger to process.. or may be because of the network traffic..!!
Check the each time stamp from message monitoring tool in RWB and verify for accuracy.
VJ
Maybe you are looking for
-
I'm not gonna say "iCal blows"... You know it, I know it, I won't say it.
"honk" What's with these little alarms on iCal? ... Who's gonna hear that? I'll tell ya who: Nobody and if you're sleeping, you can forget about it. Now see here, I'm 57 years old, I can hardly read what I'm writing. I wanna change my calender. Can s
-
Mac Pro Locked Up and Now One Video Card and Audio Not Working
Last night, my Mac Pro totally locked up to the point I had to power it off to get it to do anything. When restarted, one of my video cards and my audio are no longer working. I have dual monitors so tried switching the connections to see if it was t
-
I can't seem to connect my iPhone 5 to windows 7, it shows up under unspecified in the control panel but when I try to update the drivers it says access denied! Been at this for 3 days now! Tried numerous fixes, any help please?
-
Adobe flash player will not load and run. Uninstalled and reinstalled with no change.
Adobe flash player will not load. Uninstalled and reinstalled with no change.
-
Recursive function call 'CABM_READ_BOM'
Hi, I need to do a recursive call to 'CABM_READ_BOM' using different matnr each time. Data will be stored in i_exp_bom_head and i_exp_bom_item. Since this is a recursive call to the same routine and iterations depend on the level of BOM how can I k