Looking for Brain Dumps or Free Test material for 70-175/176 Visual Basic 6

Does anyone know of any web sites where I can get free study material for 70-175 and 70-176.  The need is kind of urgent.  Whether I get a job hangs on this.  I am now unemployed, and paying a hundred or so is just not possible, right now.

Hi John Buffum,
I have recently passed 70-175 exam with full marks and i am much happy to passed this exam.I am very thankful to real brain dumps through where i get 70-175 exam study guide and start preparation.I suggest you to get this dump from this site which i mention
in below.
realbraindumps.com
Awwwww. That's real sweet of you
George Taker. I've no doubt that 6 years after
John Buffum created this thread that he will be chomping at the bit to take those exams so he can still get that job.
After all somebody still needs to fix antiques. Like the one below. Seems to need a ring job possibly among other probable issues. Just like all VB6 apps.
La vida loca

Similar Messages

  • Hi. Does anyone know what video editing software is compatible with my MacBook - version 10.6.3? I am looking to edit films and already have Final Cut Pro, but am looking for something a little more basic and easier to use. Thanks. Vicki

    Hi. Does anyone know what video editing software is compatible with my MacBook - version 10.6.3? I am looking to edit films and already have Final Cut Pro, but am looking for something a little more basic and easier to use. Thanks. Vicki

    Hi Cereskit
    Thanks again for the message. I've done the updates and have the App Store on my desktop. I went into it and searched for imovie but couldn't find the basic imovie, which I presume is what I'd need for editing?, rather than imovie 11 for £10.49, which is for making trailers, it seems. Also, were you saying that imovie would be free?
    Vicki

  • Looking for comparison between MS Visual Source Safe and Oracle SCM

    Hi,
    I am looking for some comparison between MS Visual Source Safe and Oracle SCM.
    What I need is technical feature comparison (not just marketing comparison stating that Oracle SCM is better for everything is stored in the very reliable Oracle database(although this is a good point)).
    Any help in this area will be helpfull.
    Best regards,
    Mihail Daskalov

    Thanks you for your answer,
    I like very much Oracle SCM, which I use extensively.
    I have very little experience with MS VSS (only on my local machine). I have never tested it in a network environment with multiple developers.
    I would like to convince other developers to switch to Oracle SCM, but I need to know what to tell them.
    I'm actually both a developer and DBA, and I do like the safety the Oracle Database offers for storing files inside.
    I like very much the opportunity to connect with Oracle Repository Navigator from a remote location to my database through Connection Manager and to be able to work with my projects. (There is an issue with this configuration due to the JDBC driver used I'm unable to compare files).
    But to convince people I need to know more about the differences between MS VSS and Oracle SCM.
    I would appreciate if any of the developers share experience with VSS and SCM.
    Regards,
    Mihail Daskalov

  • Struct in type library for DLL called from Visual Basic

    Wrong dicsussion board, sorry.
    Menchar
    Message Edited by menchar on 10-20-2008 01:28 PM

    In CVI, you can get the parameter information into a DLL. First of all, you have to have a function panel (.fp) file with all of your exported functions defined as function panels. From this function panel file you can also generate a windows help file to document your DLL. Once you have the .fp file and .hlp file, you can enable references to them in the build target settings (Build->Target Settings...). Select "Type Library..." and check "Add type library resource to DLL" and "include links to help file" then browse to your .fp file. If there are descepencies between the functions defined in your .fp file and the actual functions you have exported in the DLL, then you may get a compiler error.
    --Peter

  • Looking for a specific app...

    I'm pretty sure I've been through the entire list of iTouch apps at least three or four times. I'm looking for an app that is basically a journal that would be protected with a passcode. I find to-do lists out the wazzoo, don't want those. If anyone knows of something similar that I must have overlooked OR knows how to create them...let me know!

    1password is FREE for a limited time, and it allows you to store login info and notes(you can use as journal) and then lock the application with a passcode. And lockbox does about the same thing, it's free too.

  • How to look for kMAT material in Testing client?

    Hi PP members:
    How to look for KMAT material in Test client,
    Note: I went to mm60 and entered material type: KMAT it did not populate any
    materials
    Is there any way where I can find the materials, If yes please let me know
    thanks
    Suren

    Hi Saritha:
    When I went to SE16, and entered MTART as KMAT it giving the following
    It is replying me back "No table entries found for specified key"
    Also want to bring to your kind attention I left MATNR field blank as I donot know
    the VC materials
    thanks

  • I'm looking for study material "ACI for System Engineers (ACISE)" 700-702

    Hi there
    It seems that Cisco is falling behind schedule.
    Currently I'm looking for study material for the 700-702 certification "ACI for System Engineers (ACISE)".
    Unfortunately the only thing I can find is an instructor lead "boot camp" in Bloomington, MN.
    Since I'm not interested in brain dumps from pass4sure or similar sources, can anybody help me with any other resource - boot camp, book, online training?
    Thank you

    Here is just a few.  I hope it helps
    Policy Driven Data Center with ACI, The: Architecture, Concepts, and Methodology
    http://www.ciscopress.com/store/policy-driven-data-center-with-aci-architecture-concepts-9781587144905
    Troubleshooting Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure
    https://github.com/datacenter/aci-troubleshooting-book
    https://aci-troubleshooting-book.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
    The Operations Guide should be released this summer
    http://www.virtualizationadmin.com/blogs/malhoit/news/cisco-sets-aci-release-date-july-31st.html
    Operating Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure
    http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/aci/apic/sw/1-x/Operating_ACI/Cisco_OperatingApplicationCentricInfrastructure.pdf
    Where to go for Cisco ACI Information
    http://adaptingit.com/where-to-go-for-cisco-aci-information/
    Cisco Application Centric Infrastructure Fundamentals
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/aci/apic/sw/1-x/aci-fundamentals/b_ACI-Fundamentals.html
    Cisco APIC Getting Started Guide
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/aci/apic/sw/1-x/getting-started/b_APIC_Getting_Started_Guide.html
    Cisco Application Policy Infrastructure Controller (APIC)
    Configuration Examples and TechNotes
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/cloud-systems-management/application-policy-infrastructure-controller-apic/products-configuration-examples-list.html

  • Looking for automated way to test print PnP printer after install then delete

    At times we test 20 to 30 printers in a day. I am looking for automated ways to increase the efficiency of this. I would like to simply have the printer install using PnP print a test page then delete itself after the test page or on removal. Are there any settings that can be changed on the computer to change the PnP process to make this possible. I am currently trying to learn and understand the Plug and play process so that I may find out how to get started. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

    Chris
    I spent all day Googling and doing side by side comparisons of my old and new systems.
    My display is a Dell U2410. It has several presets, including sRGB and Adobe RGB. I've been using sRGB.
    On my OLD system, (Win XP, PsCS2, DwCS4) there seems to be no distinction between color managed and non color managed apps, even on this wide gamut display. I could capture (digital camera) in Adobe RGB, open and edit in PsCS2, save as .psd, convert to CMYK for print, or convert to sRGB for SFW. All images looked identical and they printed and displayed perfectly. I thought this was normal, and seemed logical. This also seems to be the source of my incorrect assumptions. I was trying to get my new machine to behave like my old one.
    So I get this new machine (Windows 7, PsCS5, DwCS5) and now (still in sRGB display mode) all color managed apps appear de-saturated. Non color managed apps are OK. If I switch the display to Adobe RGB, color managed apps are OK, but non color managed apps are way too saturated. From my investigation, I believe this is normal behavior on a wide gamut display. I've tried changing the Control Panel > Display > Screen Resolution > Advanced settings > Color Management options, but to no avail. Either I'm missing something, or Windows 7 is doing color management differently.
    It seems my only option now is to use Adobe RGB display setting for Ps, etc. and switch to sRGB for Dw and non color managed apps. Or, have 2 separate files for print and web. I've Googled 'til my eyes are numb and still not sure I'm getting this. Any enlightenment would be greatly appreciated.
    Finally, I don't see an edit function here, so I can't remove my previous incorrect reply. Moderator, please feel free to do so.
    Thanks

  • Looking for SAP entry level training online, maybe free/ virtual training?

    Hello,
    I am trying to find out if there is any free online training?
    I am looking for some type of test database, free training, or virtual logins, etc...
    I am interested in Learning SAP but have no experience.
    I am not working for an employer that uses SAP or where I would use it in my job role.
    I want to learn how to use it.
    I see lots of job postings wanting the experience in SAP.
    Thank You,
    Wayne

    It's very inappropriate and rude of you to use these help forums to spam!!! These are forums people go for help, not to be spammed! Please stop immediately.
    Also you didn't pay a second attention to note that this is totally the wrong forum to post spam regarding SAP and 11i.
    Martin

  • Hi looking for a bit of free  anti - virus and firewall for osx 10.8.2

    hi looking for a bit of free  anti - virus and firewall for osx 10.8.2 any pointers also any one used Mac cleaner ?

    1. This comment applies to malicious software ("malware") that's installed unwittingly by the victim of a network attack. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the victim's computer. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it. If you have reason to suspect that you're the target of such an attack, you need expert help.
    2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files. This feature is transparent to the user, but internally Apple calls it "XProtect." The recognition database is automatically updated once a day; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
    The following caveats apply to XProtect:
    It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets (see below.)
    It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
    3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been another layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't actually been tested by Apple (unless it comes from the Mac App Store), but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. For most practical purposes, applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed can be considered safe.
    Gatekeeper has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
    It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
    A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could find some other way to evade Apple's controls.
    For more information about Gatekeeper, see this Apple Support article.
    4. Beyond XProtect and Gatekeeper, there’s no benefit, in most cases, from any other automated protection against malware. The first and best line of defense is always your own intelligence. All known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore reduces to a battle of wits between you and the malware attacker. If you're smarter than he thinks you are, you'll win.
    That means, in practice, that you never use software that comes from an untrustworthy source. How do you know whether a source is trustworthy?
    Any website that prompts you to install a “codec,” “plug-in,” or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one, is untrustworthy.
    A web operator who tells you that you have a “virus,” or that anything else is wrong with your computer, or that you have won a prize in a contest you never entered, is trying to commit a crime with you as the victim. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn users who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
    “Cracked” copies of commercial software downloaded from a bittorrent are likely to be infected.
    Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, must be downloaded directly from the developer’s website. No intermediary is acceptable.
    5. Java on the network (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related) is a weak point in the security of any operating system. If a Java web plugin is not installed, don't install one unless you really need it. If it is installed, you should disable it (not JavaScript) in your web browsers. Few websites have Java content nowadays, so you won’t be missing much. This setting is mandatory in OS X 10.5.8 or earlier, because Java in those obsolete versions has known security flaws that make it unsafe to use on the Internet. The flaws will never be fixed. Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java can never be fully trusted, even if no vulnerabilities are publicly known at the moment.
    Follow these guidelines, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can reasonably be.
    6. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they all do more harm than good. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use the free software ClamXav — nothing else.
    Why shouldn't you use commercial "anti-virus" products?
    Their design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere.
    In order to meet that nonexistent threat, the software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
    By modifying the operating system, the software itself may create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
    7. ClamXav doesn't have these drawbacks. That doesn't mean it's entirely safe. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so can corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
    ClamXav is not needed, and should not be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful only for detecting Windows malware. If you don't need to do that, avoid it. Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else.
    8. The greatest danger posed by anti-virus software, in my opinion, is its effect on human behavior. When people install such software, which does little or nothing to protect them from emerging threats, they get a false sense of security from it, and then they may do things that make them more vulnerable. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.
    9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use.

  • I am looking for a (free, ideally) virus scan/check for my MacBook Pro -- any suggestions?

    I am looking for a (free, ideally) virus scan/check for my MacBook Pro -- any suggestions?

    Mac users often ask whether they should install "anti-virus" software. The answer usually given on ASC is "no." The answer is right, but it may give the wrong impression that there is no threat from what are loosely called "viruses." There  is a threat, and you need to educate yourself about it.
    1. This is a comment on what you should—and should not—do to protect yourself from malicious software ("malware") that circulates on the Internet and gets onto a computer as an unintended consequence of the user's actions. It does not apply to software, such as keystroke loggers, that may be installed deliberately by an intruder who has hands-on access to the computer, or who has been able to log in to it remotely. That threat is in a different category, and there's no easy way to defend against it.
    The comment is long because the issue is complex. The key points are in sections 5, 6, and 10.
    OS X now implements three layers of built-in protection specifically against malware, not counting runtime protections such as execute disable, sandboxing, system library randomization, and address space layout randomization that may also guard against other kinds of exploits.
    2. All versions of OS X since 10.6.7 have been able to detect known Mac malware in downloaded files, and to block insecure web plugins. This feature is transparent to the user. Internally Apple calls it "XProtect."
    The malware recognition database used by XProtect is automatically updated; however, you shouldn't rely on it, because the attackers are always at least a day ahead of the defenders.
    The following caveats apply to XProtect:
    ☞ It can be bypassed by some third-party networking software, such as BitTorrent clients and Java applets.
    ☞ It only applies to software downloaded from the network. Software installed from a CD or other media is not checked.
    As new versions of OS X are released, it's not clear whether Apple will indefinitely continue to maintain the XProtect database of older versions such as 10.6. The security of obsolete system versions may eventually be degraded. Security updates to the code of obsolete systems will stop being released at some point, and that may leave them open to other kinds of attack besides malware.
    3. Starting with OS X 10.7.5, there has been a second layer of built-in malware protection, designated "Gatekeeper" by Apple. By default, applications and Installer packages downloaded from the network will only run if they're digitally signed by a developer with a certificate issued by Apple. Software certified in this way hasn't necessarily been tested by Apple, but you can be reasonably sure that it hasn't been modified by anyone other than the developer. His identity is known to Apple, so he could be held legally responsible if he distributed malware. That may not mean much if the developer lives in a country with a weak legal system (see below.)
    Gatekeeper doesn't depend on a database of known malware. It has, however, the same limitations as XProtect, and in addition the following:
    ☞ It can easily be disabled or overridden by the user.
    ☞ A malware attacker could get control of a code-signing certificate under false pretenses, or could simply ignore the consequences of distributing codesigned malware.
    ☞ An App Store developer could find a way to bypass Apple's oversight, or the oversight could fail due to human error.
    Apple has so far failed to revoke the codesigning certificates of some known abusers, thereby diluting the value of Gatekeeper and the Developer ID program. These failures don't involve App Store products, however.
    For the reasons given, App Store products, and—to a lesser extent—other applications recognized by Gatekeeper as signed, are safer than others, but they can't be considered absolutely safe. "Sandboxed" applications may prompt for access to private data, such as your contacts, or for access to the network. Think before granting that access. Sandbox security is based on user input. Never click through any request for authorization without thinking.
    4. Starting with OS X 10.8.3, a third layer of protection has been added: a "Malware Removal Tool" (MRT). MRT runs automatically in the background when you update the OS. It checks for, and removes, malware that may have evaded the other protections via a Java exploit (see below.) MRT also runs when you install or update the Apple-supplied Java runtime (but not the Oracle runtime.) Like XProtect, MRT is effective against known threats, but not against unknown ones. It notifies you if it finds malware, but otherwise there's no user interface to MRT.
    5. The built-in security features of OS X reduce the risk of malware attack, but they are not, and never will be, complete protection. Malware is a problem of human behavior, and a technological fix is not going to solve it. Trusting software to protect you will only make you more vulnerable.
    The best defense is always going to be your own intelligence. With the possible exception of Java exploits, all known malware circulating on the Internet that affects a fully-updated installation of OS X 10.6 or later takes the form of so-called "Trojan horses," which can only have an effect if the victim is duped into running them. The threat therefore amounts to a battle of wits between you and the scam artists. If you're smarter than they think you are, you'll win. That means, in practice, that you always stay within a safe harbor of computing practices. How do you know when you're leaving the safe harbor? Below are some warning signs of danger.
    Software from an untrustworthy source
    ☞ Software of any kind is distributed via BitTorrent, or Usenet, or on a website that also distributes pirated music or movies.
    ☞ Software with a corporate brand, such as Adobe Flash Player, doesn't come directly from the developer’s website. Do not trust an alert from any website to update Flash, or your browser, or any other software.
    ☞ Rogue websites such as Softonic and CNET Download distribute free applications that have been packaged in a superfluous "installer."
    ☞ The software is advertised by means of spam or intrusive web ads. Any ad, on any site, that includes a direct link to a download should be ignored.
    Software that is plainly illegal or does something illegal
    ☞ High-priced commercial software such as Photoshop is "cracked" or "free."
    ☞ An application helps you to infringe copyright, for instance by circumventing the copy protection on commercial software, or saving streamed media for reuse without permission.
    Conditional or unsolicited offers from strangers
    ☞ A telephone caller or a web page tells you that you have a “virus” and offers to help you remove it. (Some reputable websites did legitimately warn visitors who were infected with the "DNSChanger" malware. That exception to this rule no longer applies.)
    ☞ A web site offers free content such as video or music, but to use it you must install a “codec,” “plug-in,” "player," "downloader," "extractor," or “certificate” that comes from that same site, or an unknown one.
    ☞ You win a prize in a contest you never entered.
    ☞ Someone on a message board such as this one is eager to help you, but only if you download an application of his choosing.
    ☞ A "FREE WI-FI !!!" network advertises itself in a public place such as an airport, but is not provided by the management.
    ☞ Anything online that you would expect to pay for is "free."
    Unexpected events
    ☞ A file is downloaded automatically when you visit a web page, with no other action on your part. Delete any such file without opening it.
    ☞ You open what you think is a document and get an alert that it's "an application downloaded from the Internet." Click Cancel and delete the file. Even if you don't get the alert, you should still delete any file that isn't what you expected it to be.
    ☞ An application does something you don't expect, such as asking for permission to access your contacts, your location, or the Internet for no obvious reason.
    ☞ Software is attached to email that you didn't request, even if it comes (or seems to come) from someone you trust.
    I don't say that leaving the safe harbor just once will necessarily result in disaster, but making a habit of it will weaken your defenses against malware attack. Any of the above scenarios should, at the very least, make you uncomfortable.
    6. Java on the Web (not to be confused with JavaScript, to which it's not related, despite the similarity of the names) is a weak point in the security of any system. Java is, among other things, a platform for running complex applications in a web page, on the client. That was always a bad idea, and Java's developers have proven themselves incapable of implementing it without also creating a portal for malware to enter. Past Java exploits are the closest thing there has ever been to a Windows-style virus affecting OS X. Merely loading a page with malicious Java content could be harmful.
    Fortunately, client-side Java on the Web is obsolete and mostly extinct. Only a few outmoded sites still use it. Try to hasten the process of extinction by avoiding those sites, if you have a choice. Forget about playing games or other non-essential uses of Java.
    Java is not included in OS X 10.7 and later. Discrete Java installers are distributed by Apple and by Oracle (the developer of Java.) Don't use either one unless you need it. Most people don't. If Java is installed, disable it—not JavaScript—in your browsers.
    Regardless of version, experience has shown that Java on the Web can't be trusted. If you must use a Java applet for a task on a specific site, enable Java only for that site in Safari. Never enable Java for a public website that carries third-party advertising. Use it only on well-known, login-protected, secure websites without ads. In Safari 6 or later, you'll see a lock icon in the address bar with the abbreviation "https" when visiting a secure site.
    Stay within the safe harbor, and you’ll be as safe from malware as you can practically be. The rest of this comment concerns what you should not do to protect yourself.
    7. Never install any commercial "anti-virus" (AV) or "Internet security" products for the Mac, as they are all worse than useless. If you need to be able to detect Windows malware in your files, use one of the free security apps in the Mac App Store—nothing else.
    Why shouldn't you use commercial AV products?
    ☞ To recognize malware, the software depends on a database of known threats, which is always at least a day out of date. This technique is a proven failure, as a major AV software vendor has admitted. Most attacks are "zero-day"—that is, previously unknown. Recognition-based AV does not defend against such attacks, and the enterprise IT industry is coming to the realization that traditional AV software is worthless.
    ☞ Its design is predicated on the nonexistent threat that malware may be injected at any time, anywhere in the file system. Malware is downloaded from the network; it doesn't materialize from nowhere. In order to meet that nonexistent threat, commercial AV software modifies or duplicates low-level functions of the operating system, which is a waste of resources and a common cause of instability, bugs, and poor performance.
    ☞ By modifying the operating system, the software may also create weaknesses that could be exploited by malware attackers.
    ☞ Most importantly, a false sense of security is dangerous.
    8. An AV product from the App Store, such as "ClamXav," has the same drawback as the commercial suites of being always out of date, but it does not inject low-level code into the operating system. That doesn't mean it's entirely harmless. It may report email messages that have "phishing" links in the body, or Windows malware in attachments, as infected files, and offer to delete or move them. Doing so will corrupt the Mail database. The messages should be deleted from within the Mail application.
    An AV app is not needed, and cannot be relied upon, for protection against OS X malware. It's useful, if at all, only for detecting Windows malware, and even for that use it's not really effective, because new Windows malware is emerging much faster than OS X malware.
    Windows malware can't harm you directly (unless, of course, you use Windows.) Just don't pass it on to anyone else. A malicious attachment in email is usually easy to recognize by the name alone. An actual example:
    London Terror Moovie.avi [124 spaces] Checked By Norton Antivirus.exe
    You don't need software to tell you that's a Windows trojan. Software may be able to tell you which trojan it is, but who cares? In practice, there's no reason to use recognition software unless an organizational policy requires it. Windows malware is so widespread that you should assume it's in everyemail attachment until proven otherwise. Nevertheless, ClamXav or a similar product from the App Store may serve a purpose if it satisfies an ill-informed network administrator who says you must run some kind of AV application. It's free and it won't handicap the system.
    The ClamXav developer won't try to "upsell" you to a paid version of the product. Other developers may do that. Don't be upsold. For one thing, you should not pay to protect Windows users from the consequences of their choice of computing platform. For another, a paid upgrade from a free app will probably have all the disadvantages mentioned in section 7.
    9. It seems to be a common belief that the built-in Application Firewall acts as a barrier to infection, or prevents malware from functioning. It does neither. It blocks inbound connections to certain network services you're running, such as file sharing. It's disabled by default and you should leave it that way if you're behind a router on a private home or office network. Activate it only when you're on an untrusted network, for instance a public Wi-Fi hotspot, where you don't want to provide services. Disable any services you don't use in the Sharing preference pane. All are disabled by default.
    10. As a Mac user, you don't have to live in fear that your computer may be infected every time you install software, read email, or visit a web page. But neither can you assume that you will always be safe from exploitation, no matter what you do. Navigating the Internet is like walking the streets of a big city. It's as safe or as dangerous as you choose to make it. The greatest harm done by security software is precisely its selling point: it makes people feel safe. They may then feel safe enough to take risks from which the software doesn't protect them. Nothing can lessen the need for safe computing practices.

  • Looking For Field Trial Customers to Test Audio & Video Using Cisco's Intercompany Media Engine (IME)

    IntelePeer, Inc. (www.intelepeer.com) is a leading provider of on-demand cloud-based IP communications services, and is currently looking for a limited number of existing users of Cisco's CUBE, CUCM, or CME call processing systems to work with IntelePeer in testing our new hosted audio and video federation applications, including interworking with CUCM systems enabled with Cisco's Intercompany Media Engine (IME) platform.  The specific supported Cisco call processing and audio/video specs mentioned above are as follows:
    Call Processing:
    Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) - preferred
    Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 6.X or higher
    Cisco Unified CallManager Express (CUCME) 7.1 or higher
    Audio Codecs Supported:
    G.722
    G.711
    Video Codecs Supported:
    H.264
    H.263
    IntelePeer will provide those willing to participate with a no cost SIP trunk, as well as free IME based voice and video usage during the trial.  The specific details of the requested test case scenarios, as well as timeframes for testing, will be outlined in detail upon being approved for participation in the field trial program.
    Those willing to participate are urged to notify us immediately, via response to this form.
    Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.  We very much look forward to working with you during this field trial.
    Sincerely,
    IntelePeer, Inc.

    Hello there and yes I would be interested in learning more about your testing program. How can I share a little bit about my environment and we can see I'd we would be a good candidate. Please feel free to reach me at [email protected] or [email protected]
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

  • Looking For Field Trial Customers to Test Audio & Video Using Cisco's Intercompany Media Engine

    IntelePeer, Inc. (www.intelepeer.com) is a leading provider of on-demand cloud-based IP communications services, and is currently looking for a limited number of existing users of Cisco's CUBE, CUCM, or CME call processing systems to work with IntelePeer in testing our new hosted audio and video federation applications, including interworking with CUCM systems enabled with Cisco's Intercompany Media Engine (IME) platform.  The specific supported Cisco call processing and audio/video specs mentioned above are as follows:
    Call Processing:
    Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) - preferred
    Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) 6.X or higher
    Cisco Unified CallManager Express (CUCME) 7.1 or higher
    Audio Codecs Supported:
    G.722
    G.711
    Video Codecs Supported:
    H.264
    H.263
    IntelePeer will provide those willing to participate with a no cost SIP trunk, as well as free IME based voice and video usage during the trial.  The specific details of the requested test case scenarios, as well as timeframes for testing, will be outlined in detail upon being approved for participation in the field trial program.
    Those willing to participate are urged to notify us immediately, via response to this form.
    Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.  We very much look forward to working with you during this field trial.
    Sincerely,
    IntelePeer, Inc.

    Hi, Stephen.
    Yes, we would be more than happy to speak with you about becoming a test participant for IME.  If you could please email me with your contact information, I will get in touch to set up a meeting to discuss.
    Please advise.
    Thanks much.
    Regards,
    Scott
    Scott Davidson
    Product Manager
    http://www.voex.com/index.php
    2300 15th Street
    Suite 100
    Denver, CO 80202
    303.222-0090 Office
    303-818-9183 Mobile
    [email protected]

  • What to look for in free fonts?

    I want to download some free fonts (I am a student) to use for some 300ppi print pieces and am wondering what to look for in a free font to determine whether it will print nicely at a high quality. What makes a good quality font? I know there is lots of garbage out there though there are also many good quality free fonts.
    Thanks.

    This is not remotely a Photoshop question.
    Try the Adobe Typography forum:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/design_development/typography

  • Looking for a beta tester

    I'm putting the final touches on my next app. I'd love to get another set of eyes to help me go over the app. So I'm looking for a volunteer to help me test the heck out of my app.
    In return I will offer my time to help either the same person with their app (testing, not writing) or the app of someone else. Kind of a Pay-It-Forward idea.
    So if you are seriously interested and have the time this week or next to help me out please contact me at:
    rmaddy followed by the circled A then G mail company suffix.
    Ideally the willing person will look for bugs as well as offer suggestions on usability, and the like.
    And I'm looking for an person who does not develop iPhone apps professionally, but on their own time. No NDA required but I'd like to keep the app details between me and the other person until it's released.
    Thanks.

    may i?

Maybe you are looking for