Looking for small part for HPw2207 monitor

Hello. I am looking for a small circuit board part for my HPw2207 monitor. After searching for solutions to a OSD Lockout problem,  I found that pressing the Menu button for 10 seconds should stop it. However, the switch itself seemed stuck in the "on" position. So, as I am fairly adept at repairing things, I decided to open the monitor and see what the problem was. Well, I found it. After discovering how to remove the front and rear plastic bezel, down at the bottom of the monitor, where the Menu buttons are, there was a small circuit board housing and switch button assembly, that was all corroded. I removed it to look closer and what did I find?? It was CAT PEE!!!  One of my wife's cat's must have sprayed the corner where these switches are, and as cat pee is very acidic, it had completely corroded the 3  pins on the circuit board connector, and froze up 3 of the 4 micro switches.  So now, my only recourse to fix this is to order a new circuit board assembly. So......this is my question.  
  Are these parts still available, and if so, how do I order them.   I do have some numbers from the circuit board itself, which is held in place with the button assembly by two small screws.  
On the front side of the circuit board, there is a number, which may or may not be the complete assembly number or perhaps the circuit board number, but I'm not sure. Here it is.
7900771500000R
On the back side of the circuit board(green side) there was this number.
490481500600
I don't even need the entire assembly. Only the circuit board.  I just purchased this monitor and can't afford another one.
I may be able to use the monitor withOUT the circuit board in place, if it will work. I'm going to reassemble it without it to check. But if this circuit board is available, I would sure like to get one so I have access to the Menu items.  Since these monitors are still being sold(at Staples) I assume parts MUST be available, but from my experience in searching HP...well, I wouldn't doubt they arn't. But just in case...that's why I am posting this thread.  Thanks for any help.
Oh...btw...the CAT is GONE now. History. Good riddance too. He pee'd on more than this monitor too. Ruined half a dozen things of mine and this was the last straw.
Thanks
Rick
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Hi Rick,
You might look on eBay for the part or Google the part number. HP considers monitors consumables so internal parts are not stocked. 
I don't think an extended warranty will cover TCP (tom cat piss) even if you had one.
HP DV9700, t9300, Nvidia 8600, 4GB, Crucial C300 128GB SSD
HP Photosmart Premium C309G, HP Photosmart 6520
HP Touchpad, HP Chromebook 11
Custom i7-4770k,Z-87, 8GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650,GTX 760
Custom i7-4790k,Z-97, 16GB, Vertex 3 SSD, Plextor M.2 SSD, Samsung EVO SSD, Corsair HX650, GTX 660TI
Windows 7/8 UEFI/Legacy mode, MBR/GPT

Similar Messages

  • Looking for a monitor

    I am looking for a monitor to use with Aperture and Final Cut. Maybe 22 or 24 inch.  I am not ready to spring for an Apple Cinema Display, so what is out there?
    Any good websites with reviews or recommendations for the forum ?

    Kirby Krieger wrote:
    What's your budget?  Seriously -- no reason to make recommendations of specific monitors without knowing how much you expect to spend.
    Very strongly suggest including hardware calibration along with the monitor purchase.  A lot of monitors are good, some are superb, none are reliable without hardware calibration.
    I use NEC monitors and a ColorMunki Photo photospectrometer, and am happy to recommend each.
    Kirby,
    I would like to stay under $800 and it is looking like that might be a realistic budget for a decent 22 - 24 inch monitor.
    I agree with your point about calibration.  When I visit my son in Pa I use his calibration hardware on my 17"MBP.  So I will be getting my own system to keep things correct.
    In the reviews I have read NEC has had some very favorable models. I have seen some very low cost monitors that are reported to have great specs around color and the other important parameters but they tend to have limited input choices and I am not sure about the long term reliability of these.  I typically lean toward name brands, like NEC , that have a proven track record.

  • Looking for 27" monitor or larger under $350

    Looking for (2) 27" monitor or larger under $350 each. It will be a dual monitor for a new build. Used mostly for PP cs 5.5   Win 7, 64 bit
    1920/1080 of course.
    Video card will be:
    ASUS ENGTX480/2DI/1536MD5 GeForce GTX 480 (Fermi) 1536MB 384-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.0 x16 HDCP Ready SLI Support Video Card
    Model #:ENGTX480/2DI/1536MD5
    Item #:N82E16814121373
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814121373
    What monitors can you recommend?

    Ouf! A 27" monitor at that price? I hope it's just for your workspace and not to monitor and color corect your footage. If you're only looking for a 1920x1080 display, there are tones. I can't vouch for them, as I'd never get a 1920x1080 that is more then 24". But for 2560x1440 and up, they usually start at more then $800. If your looking for 1920x1080, you'd better get a great quality 24" IPS at that price.
    But it all depends on what you want to do.

  • I am looking for a monitor

    i am buying a gaming monitor and need some recommendations. looking for something around 24-27 inches. about 150-250 is my budget.

    Dell S2740L 27" Monitor with LED
    DISPLAY
    Diagonally Viewable Size:
    68.6 cm (27")
    Horizontal: 597.9 mm (23.54")
    Vertical: 336.3 mm (13.24")
    Maximum resolution:
    1920 x 1080 at 60 Hz
    Aspect Ratio:
    16:9
    Pixel Pitch:
    0.311 mm
    Brightness:
    270 cd/m2 (typical)
    Color Support:
    Color Gamut (typical): 84%5
    Color Depth: 16.7 million colors
    Contrast Ratio:
    1,000:1 (typical)
    8 million:1 (Dynamic Contrast Ratio)
    Max Viewing Angle: (typical)
    (178° vertical / 178° horizontal)
    Response Time: (typical)
    7 ms with overdrive (gray to gray)
    Panel Type:
    In-plane switching, Glossy
    Panel Backlight:
    LED

  • There is nothing in my utilities folder i am looking for activity monitor can someone advisce me please

    there is nothing in my utilities folder a s i am looking for my activity monitor to see why my trash it is not working i am trying to delete files from copy but cannot i need help asap

    donna maree wrote:
    i am a new mac user so i am very frustrated i find it is not user friendly........
    Once you sort this out, see  these (I'm assuming you've had a windoze machine before):
    Switching from Windows to Mac OS X,
    Basic Tutorials on using a Mac,
    Mac OS X keyboard shortcuts,
    Anatomy of a Mac,
    MacTips,
    Switching to Mac Superguide, and
    Switching to the Mac: The Missing Manual, Mountain Lion Edition.
    Additionally, *Texas Mac Man* recommends:
    Quick Assist,
    Welcome to the Switch To A Mac Guides,
    Take Control E-books, and
    A guide for switching to a Mac.

  • Looking for a monitor that will match the picture quality on my Macbook Pro.

    Today i bought a 27" LED Monitor w/ 2560 X 1440 resolution. The specs on the box seemed to match that of a thunderbolt display yet when connected (via HDMI) the picture quality was significantly lower than that of my Macbook Pro (13.3" 2.9 Ghz July 2012). Im likely to return this monitor due to the poor quality. What i want to know is what kind of monitor is out there that will match the color and quality of my macbook pro. I am willing to lose monitor size in return for this quality but i dont want to spend $1,000 on a thunderbolt display (i spent $400 on this monitor). Any one out the with monitor knowledge to help me out in my purchasing decision?

    For anyone out there with a similar problem, after a few days of researching the issue i've found a solution. The problem being that HDMI cables wont support resolution higher than 1080p (1920 x 1080) therefore using an HDMI connection, your monitor wont output to its full potential (that is ofcourse if it can support higher than 1920 x 1080). The solution is to use a DisplayPort connection. DisplayPort is the best connection for computer monitors because it can output higher resolutions than hdmi and in most cases DVI. Today it seems like everyone is using HDMI to connect everything and it has become the standard. In the case of TV/Cable HDMI is probably your best choice because it is more properly formatted for that type of display but if you want the best picture quality for computer monitors, i'd stick with a DisplayPort cable. For compatibility with your Macbook Pro/Air/iMac, you do need to buy a MiniDisplayPort to DisplayPort converter cable to make the connection.
    Again this is just how to output a non-apple display to your apple computer. If you can afford them, the ThunderBolt and Apple Cinema displays are both great monitors that can output some really high quality picture as well.

  • Looking for temperature monitoring in OS 9.2.2

    Hello!
    Got one of the last dual 1.25 models of the MDD G4 series. Although, I don't really use OS 9.2.2 anymore, for some reason I am reviving my usage of it(to a point) - Does anyone know of a way to check temperature readings with MDDs in OS 9? there has to be a temperature monitor software that will run in OS 9? I checked with the people who make temperature monitor, and they don't even have an OS 9 version.
    I am anxious to see what my cpu temps are while natively inside OS 9.2.2
    Thanks!
    Nadav

    There is a Mac OS 9 version for Daystar's MAChSpeed. One of its functions is thermal monitoring.
    http://www.daystartechnology.com/AppleMac_Products/XLR8_Macintosh_Products/Mac_CPU_Cache_Control_SoftwarePS.html
    It's not free, but low cost ($9.95).

  • Looking for a third party display

    I own a 12" Powerbook and am looking for a monitor in the 20"-23" range. After having read some comments in these discussions, I am intrigued by the idea of opening my search to non-Apple monitors. I prefer the 4x3 aspect ratio rather than the panoramic of the Apple displays. Also I love the idea of pivoting and working in the portrait mode, which is not offered by the Apple displays. I'll use the monitor mostly for digital photography, so image quality and color fidelity is important. However I am still not sure if I'll face problems with non-apple monitors. What if the software that they come bundled with is not apple-compatible? How will I be able to adjust it and/or calibrate it? Is there something important that I'll be missing by not buying an Apple display in terms of control over the monitor and interaction between my computer and the monitor? Your experience and advice in this regard will be welcome.
    12" Powerbook G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

    Thanks again Phil Ta. I have read about the La Cie 321, which seems to be the standard among professional photographers, but the price is hard to digest for an amateur photographer like me. Does anybody know if the La Cie Photon 20 Vision, whose price is much more reasonable, has comparable quality to that of the 321?
    About the Dell 2405 FPW, I had decided at some point to buy it, until I read in another forum about the very narrow horizontal viewing angle, which given its large panoramic size, means that if you are not far enough, the values in the center of the screen are different from those on the sides, and they change as you move sideways. And that is something that I couldn't cope with. I also read it is way too bright even at the darkest setting, producing eye strain.
    Going back to the xbitlabs article, I hope that you are right and Samsung has been able to improve the color in their monitors since the article was written. The one thing that worries me is this comment about the PVA (Samsung) monitors: "when you are looking straight at the screen, the matrix “loses” some shades, which return after you deflect your line of sight from the perpendicular a little". Has anyone out there noticed anything like this in their Samsung monitors? The last thing I want, is to have to find the right sight angle by bending my neck, the way I have to do now (vertically) with the display in my laptop.
    And one last question: do you know if the use of a bigger monitor will strain my little 12" Powerbook? Will I risk overheating it? Will the computer somehow perform slower while using visual applications like Photoshop or Final Cut Pro, for having to "feed" so many more pixels?
    12" Powerbook G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  
    12" Powerbook G4   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

  • Looking for gcmonitor software

    I'm looking for information on where to download the Sun Workshop Memory Monitor (aka gcmonitor) software. A previous project member apparently downloaded it to our Solaris server this past December but left no documentation on where it came from. A search of the Sun site returns only a man page for one of the gcmonitor methods.
    Any help would be most appreciated.
    Robin

    Do you mean you are looking for "Parental Monitoring" software? I know it is the same thing but your searches will definitely return different (and better) responses if you look for that term.
    Such software is built into MacOS X. You could ditch Vista and just use that. Otherwise, you'll have to ask Microsoft or look elsewhere. For us Apple users, this is a problem that was solved some time ago.

  • Looking for spyware software.

    Im looking for spyware software for Vista. I want to record all use of my computer by my kids. Anyone have experience with this type of software?
    Thanks all!
    Captain

    Do you mean you are looking for "Parental Monitoring" software? I know it is the same thing but your searches will definitely return different (and better) responses if you look for that term.
    Such software is built into MacOS X. You could ditch Vista and just use that. Otherwise, you'll have to ask Microsoft or look elsewhere. For us Apple users, this is a problem that was solved some time ago.

  • Looking for gardening software

    Anyone know where I can get Mac compatible garden design and record keeping software applicable for Western canada , most of the good stuff is British or American in focus

    Do you mean you are looking for "Parental Monitoring" software? I know it is the same thing but your searches will definitely return different (and better) responses if you look for that term.
    Such software is built into MacOS X. You could ditch Vista and just use that. Otherwise, you'll have to ask Microsoft or look elsewhere. For us Apple users, this is a problem that was solved some time ago.

  • I'm looking for a new small, efficient media player.

    Hi there.
    The background that will give you insight into my situation but doesn't need to be read
    I come from a very cushioned past media-wise. When I really started to get into listening to music I was still using Windows. It was Winamp first, which I liked but found a little much, but a few coincidences later found XMPlay, a free but closed-source media player capable of playing not only some weird file formats such as MO3, MOD, IT, XM, S3M etc, of which I have a few files in this format, but also MP3, OGG, WAV, and all the other general stuff out there. The timing was just perfect and I "grew" into my "media years" with this player. I used it across my transition from Win98 to XP, and also used it on a Win95 laptop - and I don't even think I had to "help" the system "like" the player to make it work, although I could be wrong.
    However, XMPlay has no Linux version, and as far as I can see, no porting is planned. And as I said before, it's closed source, so not much can be done there.
    In my setup I had a machine set aside for media playback because it had a SB16 in it, and I'd run it with the bass set to 100% and treble set to 0%. Despite what you might think, the output was awesome with headphones - it could give me a good headache or two without distorting at all.
    So, when I first switched to Linux, I didn't initially switch this machine over, but left it running Win98. This got to me in the end so I switched it over... and immediately faced issues. Since there was no port of XMPlay, I needed to find a new player, and fast. XMPlay has a bunch of audio postprocessing features I had enabled, none of which I found support or equivalents for in Linux (for example, an EQ setting promoting bassboost, in addition to that provided by the card - you can understand the headaches). I eventually gave up and ran XMPlay using WINE... and left it that way, for several months. I mean, it worked, didn't it? Then the fact that XMPlay over WINE on a 450MHz processor (it's a P3, haha) used 50%+ CPU -minimum- for the player to even be running (IIRC) got to me, so I decided once again that a new player had to be found. After some digging, I found XMMS to be the most likely candidate (it supports LADSPA and I could configure a bass-boost filter), and for the most part, it worked well. Quite well.
    Then... after I recently found myself recording some audio from the SB16's output to my main machine's input (the simplest way to get around the issue that the bass boost isn't very easy to feed back into the card - or impossible, I haven't tried it for so long), and had my headphones connected to my desktop to monitor the recording. Then, after that was done, I somehow started listening to some other piece of music (through my main box), for whatever reason. I immediately noticed a rather stark contrast in quality to what I'd recorded from the SB16 and what I was listening to. A doublecheck later confirmed that yes, my SB16 was of terrible quality, and yes, I needed a solution, since I wasn't gonna listen to that kinda sound quality anymore now that I knew.
    Over the past few weeks (months?) up until this point I've slowly been weaning myself off the music I liked so much (XMs and MODs, and maybe the occasional S3M), and the postprocessing features I thought had glued themselves into my ears....
    The, uh, like, point.
    ....so I need a media player that doesn't have much in terms of sound processing, but meets all the following requirements, either built in or as a plugin (as logically applicable):
    * Can hide completely, leaving only a hotkey to bring it back. I don't use a system tray and don't want to, for any purpose.
    * Is written in a compiled language.
    * Has configurable global hotkey support
    * Isn't bloated, dependancy-wise, filesize or memory-wise, or desktop-real-estate-wise - something that uses basic C and has a basic GUI preferred
    * Controls the hardware volume so that volume changes are instant
    * Supports tracks longer than 60 minutes / 1 hour
    * Has good file management / playlist support
    * Is something I can throw a gigantic directory tree at and expect to load all the music in it, FAST. I could throw my entire 32GB HDD at XMPlay when I wanted to see/remember what new music was on it and I'd just leave it alone for slightly under 5 minutes. When I returned to it, bam, playlist. That was on the 450MHz P3, running Win98. XMPlay also gave me feedback - if you can recommend something that shows me where it is on the filesystem, that'd be great.
    Up until now, Audacious has met those requirements. But it's had the following issues:
    * The track details window won't open for random tracks
    * The time display stuffs up for tracks longer than >60m, showing the position at 0:59, then, 1:40, then after 10 minutes have passed 1:41, etc
    * The volume control randomly forgets how to change the volume, and I refuse to change the controller to use a software volume since it'll induce delays
    * The system has no ability to add directories recursively - this was present in XMMS, but the BMP guys removed it (?!?!?!) and since Audacious is a fork of BMP, ...
    * The latest version's global hotkeys plugin restores the window to a non-changeable location when I use the "toggle player windows" function. As a visual person I find this a huge blocker.
    Now for the list of players that don't do what I want. XD
    * mpd - expects all your files to be in one folder; mine are everywhere, even thrown across sshfs mounts to other systems.
    * audacious - ...
    * xmms - too boring. GTK1. old stuff. unsupported.
    * xmms2 - seems too "unreachable". I haven't tried this player yet, mostly because Arch has no clients in the repos. *stab*
    * banshee - 200TB of dependencies, and it needs 400TB of RAM to run. Read: I dislike Mono.
    * rhythmbox, banshee, amarok, exaile, quod libet - iTunes-ey UI. I hate iTunes-ey UIs.
    * songbird - depends on the Gecko rendering engine. I have 512MB RAM, and I already run Firefox, thanks.
    * bmp, xmms, audacious - winamp-ey UI. I want to move away from winamp-ey UIs.
    If you have any suggestions... I'll be amazed.
    -dav7
    Last edited by dav7 (2008-09-09 12:55:22)

    * Can hide completely, leaving only a hotkey to bring it back. I don't use a system tray and don't want to, for any purpose.
    Sonata, disable system tray icon, modify any panel settings to ignore it
    * Is written in a compiled language.
    mpd is written in C
    * Has configurable global hotkey support
    Set up keybindings for mpc commands
    * Isn't bloated, dependancy-wise, filesize or memory-wise, or desktop-real-estate-wise - something that uses basic C and has a basic GUI preferred
    mpd uses basic C, many, many GUIs for it around, extremely small memory footprint
    * Controls the hardware volume so that volume changes are instant
    Keybind alsamixer commands
    * Supports tracks longer than 60 minutes / 1 hour
    Is there a modern media player that doesn't do this?
    * Has good file management / playlist support
    I never use mpd's playlist capabilities, but they do seem fairly extensive.
    * mpd - expects all your files to be in one folder; mine are everywhere, evn thrown across sshfs mounts to other systems.
    Apparently you have never heard of symbolic links. OH SNAP! Just create a single directory to collect all the links in. Also, mpd does not expect everything to be in one folder; it expects everything to be available from one parent folder, allowing you to organize beneath that parent.
    The problem you're having isn't that you're looking for a music player, you're looking for a wm/media player/file manager, and that just doesn't exist on Linux, largely because we are sane (for the sake of argument, ignore Songbird right now, I don't think any of us are crazy enough to use it anyways). Like looking for a zebroctonoceros, even though a zebra exists, an octopus exists, and a rhinoceros exists, they do not exist in the same creature. For interfacing with X (keybindings and the disappearing music player), you're better off going through a configurable wm like Openbox. For the actual music playing, well, I don't see any problems with mpd besides your music files being messy, and you can't expect music playing software to solve a personal organization problem. If your file system is messy, then use a file manager to fix it, not your mp3 player. I put a lot of effort into keeping my music files properly tagged and accessible from a single top level directory called music, which then splits off into mp3/ogg files, flac files, podcasts, etc, and that largely solves the problem of wondering where s--t is.
    Another idea for you, if you have multiple machines. Collect all your music onto a single machine, and then set up that system to serve exclusively as an mpd jukebox you can listen to from your other computers over the network. Give it a try.
    Last edited by coarseSand (2008-09-11 16:03:31)

  • What to look for in an external monitor

    I am in the process of changing my editing system to handle hd. I am using a 24" imac 2.4 Intel Core 2 Duo. With my sd set up I used a Sony dv/dvcam deck and a JVC professional 13" Monitor. I am purchasing the new JVC gy-hm100u camcorder when it is released in April. I am somewhat confused about having an external monitor hooked up to my system for viewing my FCP projects. (1) What should I look for in the external monitor. Do I want a computer monitor or an HD TV? Once I purchase the external monitor/tv can I get rid of my SD JVC monitor all together. I don't want to spend a lot but I want to make sure I get a monitor with the right specs. (2) What happens if I want to use past dv footage in a new project shot in hd. I do a lot of corporate projects which require the use of old interviews as part of the new productions. Am I going to have an issue doing this? Thanks in advance for any help.
    Message was edited by: Erik Seel

    To view HD variants, you'll need a 3rd party card.
    You are severely limited with an iMac. Your only real choice is a Matrox MXO driving a 24" Dell or older 23" Apple Cinema Display.
    While you can use an AJA ioHD to drive a HDTV, you'll need to connect it via FW800. This is a problem as no other devices can be on the same bus and, since all firewire ports on an iMac are on the same bus, it won't work.
    I would not dispose of the Standard Def monitor. If you work with SD material, you'll still need it. HDtvs are lousy devices for monitoring SD.
    x

  • Looking for part no. for M93z frame stand

    Hi Everyone,
    I bought a new machine with product id 10AECTO1WW (23" non-touch M93Z all-in-one machine) from a lenovo warehouse sale. This came without any stand (this was known to me). Now i am looking for a frame stand, but can't locate its part number. Also if it is possible to order this from lenovo.
    Thanks

    Actually i am looking for monitor stand instead. Thanks

  • Looking for cheap but good second monitor

    Hi all, I use my Mac Pro mainly for recording/mixing music. Looking for a new, smaller (15''-17'') seccondary monitor for functions like MINI editing, plugin tweaking, etc. Any recommendations?

    Try EIZO monitors, good value for not so much money.
    http://www.superwarehouse.com/EIZO15_LCDMonitors/b/304/c/1872
    http://review.zdnet.com/product/lcd-monitors/eizo-flexscan-s1501-lcd-display-tft -15/33064591

Maybe you are looking for