Looking for Sony A350 calibration profiles

Light room 5.7 Raw file... I only see Adobe standard and ACR 4.4 in my profile pull down. I have downloaded Sony...Faithful landscape .dcp files and placed in ...Camera Raw/Camera Profiles/Adobe Standard folder but still not listing. How do I enable these profiles?

Only the files created by Adobe are stored at that location.
Other profiles by users and third parties should be stored at
They’re stored at:
Windows—C: \ Users \ [your username] \ AppData \ Roaming \ Adobe \ CameraRaw \
Mac—Macintosh HD / Users / [your username] / Library / Application Support / Adobe / CameraRaw /

Similar Messages

Looking for 4.5 OC Profile

Looking For 4.5 Or 4.6 Overclock Profile And All My Spec In My Signature .... I Try the picture and topic All Fail And Blue Screen And i wanna say thx for Xmad For Helping me but i need Profile Is Ready To Use Please Or Help Me In team viewer (CLICKBIOSII,Controcenter)

Quote
i need Profile Is Ready To Use
This is actually an impossible task. Here is a reason why. Unless every detail, components are 100% identical in every respect to yours, which finding someone like that would be doubtful, the settings provided by me or anyone may not work. Why? Because there are numerous variations in the components themselves. There are basics involved, but those have been given to you in previous threads and what you have read in other threads. You will have to simply try the time honored OC method of trial and error. The bottom line is that CPU you have might not be capable of running stable at 45X on Auto CPU V. no matter how many settings are tweaked.
Quote
Blue Screen
Just reporting a blue screen does not help. What is the BSOD? 124, 101, 050?

Im looking for a good display profile

Hi. Im wondering if anyone has a really nice display profile (.icc) for the Macbook Pro 13 (circa early 2011) with the 9CC5 screen (by LG). Its not like the default is a bad profile, but ive seen my dads macbook pro 13 with the Samsung screen (mines LG) and his just seems to look a little better somehow. Any comments or tips are welcome. Thank you.

If you don't want to buy a screen colorimeter (and I wouldn't blame you - mine was $250) to calibrate your screen, just create your own, personal profile. Just go to System Preferences>Display>Color tab and select "Calibrate" - you can then calibrate your monitor to your personal preferences. It might not look exactly like your Dad's but that's the best way to get it 'close'.
Good luck,
Clinton

STILL looking for a PSP compressor profile.

Send me one that works and I will send you $250.

Fred Davenport wrote:
I am still looking and willing to pay for a place to put all my files in a cloud, so I can....
• Back all my files up to the same place/cloud &....
• Be able to get all my files from my MacBook Pro, my iPhone and my iPad or any other place I can access the internet from.
• Possibly host my family photos in galleries
• Have a Public Server like to used to have with Mobile Me public server
Appears no one can offer this and hopefully Apple/iCloud will soon announce something better than what iCloud currently offers (not much!)
With MobileMe being buried in June, hoping that someone can suggest a place a can spend my $$ to replace MM and be able to store and retrieve all my files from all my devices.
Thx Much
DropBox, SugarSync, Skydrive, Box etc etc etc
I prefer SugarSync.

Share your calibrated profile?

hello all. i am having a heck of a time getting a really good calibrated profile...i am looking for a good ibook profile for general use, browsing, and dvd watching. does anyone have a profile they wouldn't mind sharing?

Hi Walker7366,
Profiles are all based on perception. What I perceive as the proper gamma may be too white for you. The only way you'll ever get your computer to display things they way you perceive them is to spend more time setting your profile. You need to have the computer setup where you normally use it with the lighting adjusted as you usually have it. You may want to try a different calibration utility such as SuperCal.
http://bergdesign.com/supercal/
John

Current Lightroom / Camera Raw Camera Profile for Sony ILCE-6000 inaccurate: green cast in shadows! Capture one better! Please fix it!

Hi folks from Adobe!
Please take note that the current Lightroom / Adobe Camera Raw Camera Profile for the Sony ILCE-6000 is very inaccurate: There is a serious green cast in the shadows!
Capture One Express for Sony (which is free by the way) renders a lot more correctly!
Please correct this, since I'd rather buy the coming LR6 because of keeping my established workflow instead of going the Capture One route.
A good example can be found in the dpreview forum "LR5 A6K shadow pulling, a mess! Adobe LR is broken? "
Or search for Philp Reeves 3 weeks with the Sony A6000 review "3 Wochen mit der a6000", where he compares it to the Sony A7, using both times Lightroom to push the shadows.
The Sony A7 is fine where earth looks like brown earth, the A6000 picture looks like grass instead.
Please fix this! This is a high volume camera frequently bought by enthusiast or as second body for FF photographers. That would be really great!

I am talking about the two raw files linked in the very last post of page 6 of the Reeves comparison thread, not JPGs or screenshots of unknown manipulation. In LR they both say f/11 and ISO 100 and have a similar tone, but one is shot at twice the shutter speed as the other. This side-by-side is using Adobe Factory Defaults for each image where the profile is Adobe Standard, the toning sliders are all 0, tone-curve linear, and the Sharpening and Color NR are 25:
However, when I look at the camera-embedded JPGs, side-by-side, the 1/80th image on the left is darker than the 1/40th image on the right, as expected given the reported shutter-speed difference:
And it is indeed the darker image that has more shadow problems, also as expected.
When I do manipulate the darker (a6000) raw file in LR, I do see that the shadows are greenish when brightened unlike most other cameras which usually show magenta, which is the combination of the blue and red sensors showing more noise because there are half-as-many photosites as compared to the green, so I am seeing what people are complaining about and would expect shadow noise to be purple not green, I'm more concerned that these two example raws aren't actually comparable due to apparent differences in exposure. It is also odd that the lens listed in LR is different than the lens listed in the filename, so either someone has mistakenly or deliberately renamed the file wrong or someone or something has changed the EXIF parameters that LR is reporting to be the same when they're really not.

Need lens profile rokinon 14mm for sony nex7

Please does anyone know if there is a Lightroom 5 lens profile for Rokinon(aka Bower/Samyang) 14 mm for sony nex 7??
Thanks

The Adobe Lens Profile implementation is not camera model specific. Cameras with the same sensor size should theoretically be able to use the same lens profiles regardless of the camera make or model. Adobe also provides the capability of using lens profiles from larger sensor size (full-frame) cameras with images shot using smaller sensor (APS-C) camera models (i.e. Crop Factor). As best I can tell the Adobe and User created lens profiles are agnostic, except for image file type. Different lens profiles are required for raw and JPEG images. As long as the lens profile crop factor is the same or smaller than the target camera it should work just fine. The Sony Nex7 has a 1.5 Crop Factor sensor size, so any lens profile with a 1.5 to 1 crop factor should work. Lens profiles with the nearly same sensor size 1.6 crop factor should also work.
The Adobe Lens Profile Downloader lists numerous lens profiles for this lens under 'Camera Make' Nikon for both raw and JPEG. You could also use any of the lens profiles that appear under 'Camera Make' Canon.
1) Download and install the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader for Windows or Mac.
2) Launch the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader, select a suitable lens profile, and download it. Add as many as you like!
3) Close and reopen LR, select an image shot with the 14mm lens, go to Develop> Lens Corrections panel, and select 'Make' same as you downloaded (i.e. Nikon), and under 'Model' scroll down to the bottom of the list and you should see the downloaded profile(s). Test it with the 14mm images.
4) If satisfied select in the Lens Profile panel Setup> 'Save New Lens Profile Default.'
These profiles are created and submitted by users with varying degrees of technical-expertise. The lens profiles have a 'Rating,' based on some metric. Please keep in mind that 100% distortion and vignetting correction can actually make the image look worse, especially with a wide-angle lens. Most wide angle lenses have barrel type distortion and when corrected with the LR Lens Profile tool you will see corner "stretching," which creates cropping and volume anamorphosis. Images also tend to look more natural when there is a slight amount of vignetting left in the image. I typically use 0% Distortion and 50% Vignetting and only adjust them higher in images where it is visible. YMMV.....

Lens Profiles for Sony Alpha DSLR's? Share Yours!

Hey everyone out there, I wanted to make a thread were we could share lens profiles for the Sony Alpha DSLR system. I currently use the A-700 and the A-900 for all of my "Pro" work. I welcome this new tool with open arms as distortion is sometimes a huge issue when using some wide angle lenses.
I personally use the following lenses on a daily basis and will be making profiles for these lenses sometime today!
Tamron 70-200mm f2.8
Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 (lots of distortion on the wide end)
Sony 50mm f1.4
Sony 70-300G
Sigma 50mm f2.8 Macro
Minolta 28mm f2.8
So lets see if we can get the most popular lenses for the Alpha mount profiled and ready to go to share with everyone and help make the Sony shooting experience a whole lot better!

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
Gaspyy wrote:
Yes, I actually believe the difference is minimal. The optical distortions & vignette would be the same. Obviously when creating the profile, it would help to use the higher-res camera, as it would allow better recognition of a finer grid chart, but the light would fall on the sensor in the same way for both cameras.
I'm not looking to argue with anyone. I know things tend to get heated sometimes here and I don't have any desire for that.
Let's say we have different opinions.
Nothing wrong with that so long we behave in in civil way.
The size of the microlenses on top of the photo cells also differ from earlier CMOS sensors.
That can influence the CA.
Color fringes, particularly noticeable at the edges of high-contrast photos, are is principally caused by lateral chromatic aberrations, where the lens — like a prism — splits the visible light into its different color components. DxO Optics Pro analyzes each image and automatically detects and corrects these fringes or irisations, thanks to its precise characterization of the fault based on the specific lens-camera combination that you use.
http://www.dxo.com/intl/photo/dxo_optics_pro/optics_geometry_corrections#ColorFringing
Regards

Look for official APPLE statement on future rSAP Bluetooth profile support

Hi,
My previous post was considered as "speculative" by the moderators (I still do not see what were the speculations but, OK, I let go)...
Therefore, I'll try to be still more factual:
_Fact 1_: current firmware of iPhone 3G does not support rSAP Bluetooth profile.
_Fact 2_: my car needs my phone to support rSAP Bluetooth profile for being able to use the built-in handsfree kit.
_Fact 3_: I cannot find anywhere an official statement from APPLE about this rSAP Bluetooth profile.
_My question_: can someone give me a link to such an official statement?
(I hope this will be considered as factual enough...

Hello. I know this is not exactly what you are looking for. But the link below is a document that informs you about current BT Profile that is used.
If you would like Apple to know about other BT Profiles needed to work with your car. Feel free to contact Apple via the feedback page below.
iPhone Bluetooth Headset and third-party Bluetooth-enabled devices
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1841
http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

Old version of FF died, downloaded new, would not launch, created new profile (did NOT show any old profiles, did NOT delete an old profile). Looked for old profile, none seem to exist. Nothing in library folder. Help. Need those bookmarks back!

managed to open the terminal app, and create a new profile. Went looking for older profile and ...nothing. there is NO firefox/mozilla folder in library/application support. I searched for "firefox" on the hd and didnt recognize anything that could/would be the profile folder. i did search my trash as well. help please :-(

You can use this button to go to the Firefox profile folder:
*Help > Troubleshooting Information > Profile Directory: Open Containing Folder
In Mac OS X v10.7, the $HOME/Library folder is a hidden folder.
Open Finder and use one of these:
* Go > Go To Folder (Shift-Command-G) and in the dialog type: ~/Library
* Open the "Go" menu and hold down the Option key to make the Library appear
You can also use this command in a Terminal window to remove the hidden flag.
* Mac HD > Applications > Utilities > Terminal
* chflags nohidden ~/Library
* http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/909/cpsid_90947.html Access hidden user library files

Looking for D7000 and Tokina 11-16mm Lens Profile

I would think by now someone would have posted this lens profile but I can't find it for the life of me, sorry. I am sure this has been discussed to death but I have downloaded the lens profile creator (haven't figured out how to use it yet) and the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader (doesn't seem to have any third party lens data for the D7000). Any help would be great.
On a side note I am also looking for a lens profile for the Pro-Optic 8mm f/3.5 fisheye, which I knew would be even harder to find, but if anyone has either of those I would greatly appreciate a link to download the profile. Thanks, Scott

There are only Nikon brand lenses in the dB, nothing from Tokina, and nothing for the 11-16mm.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Scott Fillmer | Sent via iPhone
http://www.scottfillmer.com
cell / text 334-787-9317

Camera Calibration profiles for Leica M 240

Hi Forum
I'm using LR to process DNG files from Leica M 240.
I understand LR has some extra profiles ( "Camera Faithful, Camera Portrait, etc" ) for some Canon and Nikon camera models.
As under "Camera Calibration -> Profile" I can only see "Embedded" or "Adobe Standard", does it mean these extra profiles don't exist for Leica M 240 ?
Thank you all for any clarification.

Embedded is what you will always see on JPEG images. Adobe standard is the one you will see on your raw images. If you want additional profiles you will have to download the DNG profile creator and make your own. If Adobe standard is all you have then that is all Adobe is providing for your camera.

Camera Calibration Profile for Leica D-Lux Typ 109

I have Lightroom 5.7 with Camera Raw 8.7, both supposedly the latest versions, and yet I do not see any choices other than Adobe Standard under the Camera Calibration Profile menu. I have the newly supported Leica D-Lux Typ 109, and was expecting to see some camera specific choices in the Profile menu. Am I mistaken?

Most cameras only have an Adobe Standard profile:
492 camera models have Adobe Standard profile.
166 camera models have profiles in addition to Adobe Standard, mostly Canon, Nikon, Olympus and Sony.
The only Leica model that has more than an Adobe Standard profile is the M8.

Looking for a lens profile...

Hi to all, I'm looking for a lens profile to use with Lightroom 5.7.1 and Photoshop CC 2014, the lens is a Canon Macro EFS 60mm USM, body Canon 600D.
Anyone have or know if the profile is available?
Thanks in advance
Stefano

There should already be a lens profile for that lens included in camera raw 8.7.1 and lightroom 5.7.1

Whenever i try to download a rather large file i continue to get the "could not read source file" error. Tried new profile, uninstalling and looking for the compreg.dat file to delete nothing is working. Please help

whenever i try to download a rather large file i continue to get the "could not read source file" error. Tried new profile, uninstalling and looking for the compreg.dat file to delete nothing is working. Please help

Did you reinstall CS3 after CC?
For that matter, doing an in-place upgrade on the OS is always a gamble with Adobe programs. Reinstalling all the versions you need, in order, would probably solve your problem.
And you shouldn't need to save as IDML after opening the .inx in CC.

Looking for Sony A350 calibration profiles

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for