Looking for SQL*Net patch version 2.3.3.0.3

Hello friends:
In order to migrent a Oracle 7.3 database to a Oracle 8i DB I need a SQL*Net patch version 2.3.3.0.3. Would you please tell me where can I get it?
Thank a lot!
Zhang Weidong

Similar Messages

Sql*net patch version 2.3.2.1.12 down load

While I am migrating 7.3 database to 8i, system is asking for install sql net patch version 2.3.2.1.12. How can I get this patch. Is it possible to download.
Thanks/Rgds
Biju

I know that I should first download and apply the AD related patches separetly. But, what is the best practice for downloading the rest of them? How does an experienced Applications DBA handle this kind of situation? I was trying to use the Patching Wizard on OAM, but the request errored out stating that "****No codeline specified". Where do I specify this when I download a list of patches? I just pasted a comma separated list of 249 patches into the PatchList field on Download Patches page.Please see these docs.
'Analyze specific Patch' via Patchwizard is failing with java.lang.NullPointerException [ID 1066985.1]
Patch Wizard Utility [ID 976188.1]
Patch Wizard FAQ [ID 976688.1]
Patch Wizard : Overview [ID 1077813.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Looking for SQL*Net for Windows 95

I have Brio client installed on my laptop running Windows 98. I am looking for SQL *Net for Windows 95, to connect to an Oracle database running on Solaris. Where can I find it.
How do I connect? I tried MS ODBC and it did not work.
Please help
My email address is [email protected]
Thanks in advance

despite that I do not know the type of the Firewall , I was able to adjust Oracle with Microsoft ISA server as follows :
go to oracle server on Windows 2000
open system variables
insert the following variable : USE_SHARED_SOCKET
make its value : TRUE
restart server
this variable will make you able to share ports on windows platform ,, this is essential because Oracle servers replies back on any port randomly when trying to connect to it ,, you can track this by enabling tracing for listener.
on firewall you will need to redirect connection received by the firewall on specific port on the firewall and NAT it to Oracle server IP/port .
this is proven work
on UNIX you do not need this beacsue Unix natively share ports.

Looking for SQL*NET Proxy

Hello,
i'm looking for the SQL*NET proxy because i want to integrate into out firewall software. I'm looking for a contact too. Nobody knows anything about this product.
With best regards
Claus Rosenberger

despite that I do not know the type of the Firewall , I was able to adjust Oracle with Microsoft ISA server as follows :
go to oracle server on Windows 2000
open system variables
insert the following variable : USE_SHARED_SOCKET
make its value : TRUE
restart server
this variable will make you able to share ports on windows platform ,, this is essential because Oracle servers replies back on any port randomly when trying to connect to it ,, you can track this by enabling tracing for listener.
on firewall you will need to redirect connection received by the firewall on specific port on the firewall and NAT it to Oracle server IP/port .
this is proven work
on UNIX you do not need this beacsue Unix natively share ports.

SQL* Net Patch 2.3.3.0.3

I am having Oracle 7.3 database and now i want to go for
oracle 8i.
I have Installed Oracle 8i, keeping 7.3 database.
I have selected the option to migrate from 7.3 to 8i when asked
for, but after installation when migrating it is giving an error
"install sql*net patch version 2.3.3.0.."
From where will i get this patch...
Please help me out.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramesh Ganji

You should probably post this question in the Migration forum for an appropriate response: Database and Application Migrations
OTN

HT1338 looking for an old mail version

Hi, i'm looking for an old MAIL version for 10,6,8 OSX.
I can't find it in the installation CD. I can't find it on the web.. Someone coud help me ? Thanks

Yes. The mail version you require is 4.6 (1085). This should be on the Snow Leopard Combo update per the link below.
Mac OS X 10.6.8 Update Combo v1.1
If you are still on 10.6.8 it will not hurt your files to download and apply it but be aware, it is a big update and takes some time.
Oh, and if you do take up the Combo download, there are several software updates you must follow up with, dealing with security and iTunes.
Message was edited by: seventy one

Looking for SQL Solution to Very Unique Problem

Hello,
New here, thanks. I have what I think is an interesting problem. I really don't want to post it because the background and explanation is rather lengthy. It has to do with one table that holds some general info; there is a unique numeric primary key. Associated with this table are three different tables identical in structure, having only two fields: the primary key, and a code. The three tables correspond to test results performed by a different individual. For each entry in the main table, where there is one and only one entry for the primary key, the same test could have been performed one, two, or three times. So there could be one, two, or three different sets of codes describing the test results. Only one set of the test result codes is the correct one. And there is a hierarchy that determines which is the correct set of codes. Say the main table is called LR. LR is linked to three different tables, each of which has the exact same structure. The relationship between LR and each of these three tables is one to many. Call the three tables that hold test results SCR, QC, and PT. Some assumptions can be made. In the table LR there are two flag fields: Q_STATUS and P_STATUS whose values each are either Y or N. If P_STATUS=Y, then we are guaranteed a set of test result codes in the table PT, and this set of codes is always the final word; always the correct results. If P_STATUS=N but Q_STATUS=Y, then we are guaranteed to have a set of test result codes in the table QC, and if this is the case, then this set of codes is the final word. Now if P_STATUS=N and Q_STATUS=N, then we know there is a set of test result codes in the SCR table, we know there is one and only one set of test result codes, hence this set is the correct one. Another assumption that can be made, for any row in the LR table, there will ALWAYS be at least one set of test result codes in the SCR table. There may or may not be a set of test result codes in the QC and PT tables, and the flags in the LR table indicate if either is the case. Hope this makes sense so far. For many years I have been trying to figure out one SQL statement that will return the correct set of test result codes. Often I have to analyze data that relies on the results of a test (e.g. how many tests had the code 850 in the year 2011?). That's a simple example, but you get the idea. Since I have to determine which set of test result codes is the correct one to use, I've always had to rely on writing a PL/SQL procedure anytime I have to work with test result codes. I tend to use a conditional: IF (P_STATUS=Y) THEN /*the right answer is in the table PT*/ ELSIF (Q_STATUS=Y) THEN /*the right answer is in the table QC*/ ELSE /*the right answer is in the table SCR*/. I have a document with a little more detail, and an example. Or maybe this makes absolute sense to someone out there and they know exactly what to tell me! And let me say this is not a critical issue for me. I've been searching for this SQL statement for about 10 years now. I consider myself pretty proficient with SQL, but definitely not a guru. I'm thinking the solution I'm looking for might rely one some kind of full outer join on all three of the tables SCR, QC, and PT and then if those results could be linked to the LR table, and then maybe in the SQL statement use of DECODE might do it. I want one SQL statement that will return me the correct set of testing result codes. Hope this all makes sense. To anyone who has read it I thank you very much. I would be very happy to provide my document with further explanation and an example. Any response is greatly appreciated. Guess I have to keep coming back here now to see if anyone responded. Oh, I might add that we use a very old version of Oracle (8.0.3) but, if all goes according to plan, we should migrate to the most current version within the next year.
Thanks,
John Cardella
Edited by: BluShadow on 21-Feb-2012 13:52
Email address removed for your own benefit, unless of course you'd like spam bots to pick it up and send you lots of rubbish?

Why do I keep three tables. Each sample that is evaluated is always screened by what I will call a "tech." Every so many cases the test must be repeated for quality control. If the findings of the initial testing or of a quality control test are found to contain abnormal results, then the test must also be repeated, this time looked at by a doctor. So I have what I refer to as the "main" table; the one that holds final data, which in my example I explained the two "flag" fields that indicate if the test was repeated. Every time a test is evaluated it is done by the same person, and the findings of an individual testing, or screening, are a set of test result codes. There is the "main" control table which I have called LR in my example. The reason I have the other three tables: one is used to store the test results of the initial screening (always done); one is used to hold the test results of a quality control case (may or may not be done); and one is used to hold the test results of an abnormal case that was screened by a doctor (may or may not be done). There is a separate table for each individual who may have done a screening.
Let us consider the results of just one case. In the table LR we have something like this:
| KEY | P_STATUS | Q_STATUS |
| 100 | Y | Y |
By default, for any entry in the LR table there is always a set of codes in the SCR table. We know a quality control was performed because QC_STATUS=Y, and we know it was screened by a doctor because P_STATUS=Y. So we would have three different sets of findings, each in one of the three tables:
SCR TABLE: QC TABLE:
| KEY | CODE | | KEY | CODE | | KEY | CODE |
| 100 | 014 | | 100 | 13R | | 100 | 13R |
| 100 | 13R | | 100 | 150 | | 100 | 170 |
| 100 | 150 | | 100 | 170 | | 100 | 180 |
| 100 | 160 | | 100 | 190 |
The values in the three tables represent the findings of three different people who screened the test sample. Now suppose I combined all the data, I would suppose it would look something like this:
| KEY | P_STATUS | Q_STATUS | KEY | CODE | KEY | CODE | KEY | CODE |
| 100 | Y | Y | 100 | 014 | null | null | null | null |
| 100 | Y | Y | 100 | 13R | 100 | 13R | 100 | 13R |
| 100 | Y | Y | 100 | 150 | 100 | 150 | null | null |
| 100 | Y | Y | 100 | 160 | null | null | null | null |
| 100 | Y | Y | null | null | 100 | 170 | 100 | 170 |
| 100 | Y | Y | null | null | null | null | 100 | 180 |
| 100 | Y | Y | null | null | null | null | 100 | 190 |
Since P_STATUS=Y I would want the result set returned to be {13R, 170, 180, 190}.
But suppose P_STATUS=N and Q_STATUS=Y then I would want the result set to be {13R, 150, 170}
And if P_STATUS=N and Q_STATUS=N then I would want {014, 13R, 150, 160}
Of all of the sets of test results codes, only ONE is ever the final word (i.e. the right answer).
So what I was trying to do is find a query that would give me what I want. And my apologies if there is a major design flaw. I always thought it was not that bad. But then I am no SQL guru either.
To anyone who has read on further my most humble thanks. I really did not mean to waste anyone's time or be a pain in the ass.
Thanks Again,
-JC

Looking for Final Cut Pro Version 6

I'm looking to upgrade from FCP Version 5 to Version 6, but my G5 is pre-Intel. Anyone have suggestions on where to obtain FCP 6 besides just buying a new Intel G5? I would like to get a new G5, but the economy forced me to look at least upgrading as far as I can with my current G5, first.
Thanks for any assistance!

Iguanawood wrote:
a new Intel G5?
First of all, a G5 computer uses a Motorola processor, not an Intel.
There's no such thing as an Intel G5.
I found this:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Final-Cut-Studio-2-HD-Full-Retail-Edition-Pro-FCP-6W0QQitemZ310211295520QQcmdZViewItemQQptZLH_DefaultDomain_0?hash=item483a08b920#h t_920wt1076

Looking for SQL*Loader sample file

Hi all,
I'm looking for a sample SQL*Loader file that I could use to populate the Bank Statement Interface in Cash Management (Receivables Lockbox Receipts) - specifically CE_STATEMENT_HEADERS_INT_ALL and CE_STATEMENT_LINES_INTERFACE.
I'm trying to put together an interface from Bank of America's Lockbox into our Oracle Receivables system (11.0.3), and don't have access to anything from which to start from.
Thanks in Advance,
Cam

check it
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96652/ch10.htm#1656
kuljeet pal singh

Looking for SQL for DBAs Book

I am a DBA who has rudimentary knowledge of SQL. I would like to know if there is a book like 'SQL for DBAs'. Last week, i had a requirement to find all tables without PKs in a schema. I could find it only after searching oracle forums. Now, i think, i should at least be an intermediate user of SQL before being an DBA. Hence, looking for a book to enhance my SQL skills.

In order to enhance your skills, I can recommend you to bring regular visits to this forum (as you already do) and the Database-General forum, where lots of DBA's hang out.
Other useful sites: http://asktom.oracle.com
Also I recommend all books written by Tom Kyte.
Oracle documentation is online:
http://www.oracle.com/pls/db102/homepage
http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/homepage
http://tahiti.oracle.com
Read the concepts guide and the database administration guides

Looking for SQL 2005 Backwards Compatibility ((( 8.05.2309 )))

We need to find the install for SQL 2005 Backwards Compatibility 8.05.2309 64 bit.
Can someone help with locating the install for this?
Thanks in advance for your assistance
Ed

Ed, would SQL Server 2005 Backward Compatibility Components version 8.05.2312 work for you?
http://www.exactsoftware.com/docs/DocView.aspx?DocumentID=%7B21509a73-9043-47d8-854c-318a3a35b585%7D

[Solved] System is looking for wrong shared library version

Hey guys.
Today I installed updates on my two arch machines, both running SLiM + XFCE4, using `pacman -Syu`. The update on one machine worked like a charm, but broke the other.
When booting and trying to login with SLiM, the screen goes black and I'm back at SLiM. The log shows this:
xfce4-session: error while loading shared libraries: libicule.so.50: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Of course there is no such file, because I installed icu 51.1-1 and there is only libicule.so.51 in /usr/lib/.
I tried to re-download and re-install icu and xfce4-session in rescue mode, or creating a symlink for libicule.so.50 pointing to the new, but nothing changed. I always drop back to SLiM. On the second system there is no error, I installed the new icu package, rebooted and logged in as usual.
I downgraded to icu 50.1.2-1 and I can login again. But it seems that some other applications are breaking now. (vim e.g.)
Any ideas how to fix this?
Greetz Corubba
Last edited by Corubba (2013-03-28 14:30:59)

Today I tried to update icu along with lib32-icu, but the result was the same. Still looking for libicule.so.50.
I have run `ldconfig -v` to check the symlinks, and it uses the v51 library.
And it seems not be to be a XFCE related problem, when installing v51 I can't even start vim because it also wants v50. So it has to be something other.
On both systems, the LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable is blank. When running `ldd /usr/bin/xfce4-session`, it get the same result as running it. One machine said "not found" because looking for v50, the other is using v51 and all okay.
Maybe some problem with the dynamic linker? I'm not very familiar with libraries and linking stuff.
Last edited by Corubba (2013-03-28 11:20:37)

Looking for Adobe Standard 8 version

I lost my installation CD and my computer crashed .... need to reinstall Adobe standard 8 but can't find a link for downloading this old version.
The adobe support told me to try the adobe community forum.
thanks for your help!
Sylvie

Mylenium we have added several links to older product downloads at https://helpx.adobe.com/download-install.html and http://www.adobe.com/downloads/other-downloads.html. The pages will work the same as the CS6 links at http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/cs6-product-downloads.html.

Looking for a proper Windows version to use with Bootcamp/Parallels

My birthdays in a few days and I figured I'd treat myself to a little present. However, I'm not very tech savy and unsure of which version of Windows would run best with my 15' Intel Macbook Pro (late 2008-2009).
I have found a copy of Windows 7 Home Premium on amazon (listed below)
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-7-Home-Premium/dp/B002DHGMK0
I'd just like to know if this would work, or if their are any things I should take into consideration beforehand. Here are my computer specs.
Model Name:          MacBook Pro
Model Identifier:          MacBookPro5,3
Processor Name:          Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed:          2.66 GHz
Number of Processors:          1
Total Number of Cores:          2
L2 Cache:          3 MB
Memory:          4 GB
Bus Speed:          1.07 GHz
Boot ROM Version:          MBP53.00AC.B03
Thank you!

Save your money. Get the System Builder of same from Amazon for $99.
Or look at other post I just made and get Windows 8 for free and works perfectly fine.

Looking for laptop - running Win version of CS3 on Macbook Pro?

I've been wanting to finally get a laptop for a long time now, and my first choice has always been a Macbook Pro. My main computer now is a self-built PC, and I do all my video work within CS3; my production company also runs CS3, so it made sense to mirror it at home. Anyway, my original thinking was to get a Macbook Pro so that I could have the option to edit with Final Cut Pro again, which would be nice because I see so much freelance work/job postings where the client/company is using FCP. Plus, out of all the laptops I've messed around with in the past, Macbooks always seem to work the best/fastest; and I just like them better overall.
However, the idea of getting a laptop that isn't compatible with my current personal/professional workflow doesn't seem like such a good idea now. I have plans to travel to Japan for an extended period of time too, and I want to be able to work remotely, which means having access to a PC machine running CS3. Because of this, I started looking into PC laptops again... but I'm just not impressed with what I see. So I read about the possibility of running Bootcamp on a MBP, thus allowing me to run my PC version of CS3. Theoretically I could then still work on all of my PC formatted projects and then switch back into OS X for "normal laptop computing" (as well as starting new projects with FCP).
Since I have no personal experience doing something like this though, I was wondering if anyone runs a setup like this and if so, how well does CS3/4/5 run via Bootcamp on a Macbook Pro? I've been reading on here how CS5's Mercury engine doesn't/can't work because the hardware won't support it, but does the overall editing experience suck?
Just for reference, currently all my job-related work is simple DV NTSC... so I'm sure any laptop I buy would be able to handle that. However our company is planning to upgrade to HD in the near future, and I personally work with XDCAM EX footage via my Sony EX1r. So I want a laptop that can handle HD projects without choking to death. Also, an Express Card slot would be pretty awesome, too, that way I can dump my SxS cards without having to dock the camera (a 17" MBP would offer this).
Any suggestions/help would be most appreciated, thanks!

Have a look here: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/771180?tstart=0
The final solution found in this thread, including all the specs, is way more attractive than any MBP. It gives no compatibility issues, allows upgrading to CS5 without issues, is fast enough for AVCHD and XDCAM-EX material, is easy to connect to your home PC, avoids possible problems with effects/transitions missing on the MAC, gives you much more bang-for-the-buck than any MBP.
Additionally, it saves you an extra license for PR MAC.

Looking for SQL*Net patch version 2.3.3.0.3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for