Looks fine in iWeb, Looks strange in a browser

Ughhh... so close yet so far. I'm working on my portfolio (http://web.me.com/stephaniebialik/Retro_Yellow/Homepage.html) When I view the site in a browser the words overlap (for example copywriter overlapping with Stephanie Bialik) and many of the links don't work, but it looks find when working in iWeb.

Hello Stephanie and welcome to the forum.
There are basically two reasons:
1.) not web safe fonts
2.) invalid CSS per w3 consortium standards.
remedy?
1.) use web safe fonts or convert font to image.
2.) validate your CSS and use browser-specific conditional comments for design consistency throughout browsers.

Similar Messages

  • My own website looks strange in Firefox, but it is good in Safari, why?

    The shadows behind my photos in my website (under the SHOP) looks strange. They are completely black with clear edges, but when I put my pictures so I have just added a little blurry shadows behind the images.
    This problem did not exist before, it's just a couple of months been like this in Firefox.
    Sincerely Mahzoni

    That is unfortunately a bug (Bug 662898) that slipped into Firefox 5 and that will be fixed in Firefox 6, due to be released in August.
    *http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=2240429
    *[/questions/843162]
    *[/questions/841539]

  • [Solved] Openproj looks strange in the awesome WM

    Hi Community,
    I just installed openproj from the AUR. But when I run it in the awesome WM, I found the background of the application looked nearly blank, which made openproj impossible to edit in.
    It looks strange. So, openproj cannot be run from the awesome WM?
    Any idea will be helpful. Thanks.
    =======
    Solved:
    Just edit the file /usr/bin/openproj and add a line to be as follows:
    #!/bin/sh
    wmname LG3D
    java -Xms128m -Xmx768m -jar /usr/share/openproj/openproj.jar > /dev/null
    Last edited by cwjiof (2010-01-12 14:45:20)

    Thank you very much!
    =====
    Edit:
    I've found a detailed description from this article: Java GUI application in Awesome Window Manager.
    There is a known problem with Java and the non-reparenting Window Managers like for example Awesome.
    Java applications which use the XToolkit/XAWT backend may draw gray windows only. The XToolkit/XAWT backend breaks ICCCM-compliance in JDK 5 and 6 because it assumes a reparenting window manager.
    There are a number of places where this is described:
        * in the FAQ : GUI Java apps appear as a gray screen!
        * in the wiki Problems with Java
        * in the Man page
    To sum up:
        * it doesn't affect version Java 1.4.2 and before.
        * it doesn't affect version Java 1.7 and hopefully after.
        * the best workaround by far, is to set a name to the Window Manager, so it is recognise by Java as a non-reparenting Window Manager. A simple utility allow to set this name. Just add 'wmname LG3D' to your .xinitrc or simply run it.
        * Here are other workarounds left here for reference:
              o launch another X server, like Xephyr
              o set the following environment variable (to use the older Motif back-end instead): AWT_TOOLKIT=MToolkit. But this won't work in the following cases :
                    + OpenJDK/IcedTea doesn't include the Motif toolkit.
                    + doesn't work for x86_64 Java, for whatever reason
    Last edited by cwjiof (2009-10-19 12:07:14)

  • Itunes is displaying in Japanese , all th fonts look strange. Just upgraded

    Athlon Windows XP
    Just upgraded to 7.02 and all text looks strange and music looks to be for the Japan market and price of download in in Yen. All my setting in iTunes are for English.
    What can I do?

    ME TOO!
    At first I thought it was cute, "oh look now I can listen to cool J-pop bands like Bump of Chicken and BoA", but it won't go away. Where is my itms that I know and love.
    And who wants to pay up to 200 yen for a song? That's like two dollars.
    Plus I can't read Japanese.
    Is everyone's iTunes like this right now?

  • Worldclock widget looks strange!

    hi,
    i got my new 15" PB last week and it rocks! But my Worldclock widget looks strange. The clock case (in the lower half where it gets darker) shows little grey artefacts. All other Widgets show up correctly. Any idea how i can resolve this?
    thx!

    hmm, seems that this issue is normal, a friend of mine has the same with his 15" PB.

  • Cpu socket looks strange-can be cause of boot problem?

    Actual question: can cpu socket like on attached picture cause boot problems?
    tinypic.com/r/1pxnxs/6
    (Some pins look strange while I am sure I did not do anything which can cause that)
    (Sorry was not able attach pic, so shared on external site - blame android?)
    I got problem with booting msi g33m motherboard, I tried various ways and was able to boot couple times, but after reboot the problem returns. When disassembly components for nth time, I noticed strange hole in cpu socket, so I wonder if it can be reason for boot problems? Currently fans run in ÷half speed when nothing connected to mb, if I connect gpu or sata drive, fans are pulsing, and led near power button on tower is blinking, but nothing more happens.

     The pin(s) are bent it seems and can be carefully bent back to proper alignment most of the time using tweezers and or tiny jewelers/eyeglass screwdriver.
     Yes the problem you describe can definitely be caused by poor pin contact with the pads on the CPU. Depending on what pins are bent or make poor contact there could be many different kinds of problems. In fact many more on newer ones with memory controller and other controllers in the CPU that used to be in the northbridge chip. If you or a friend, family member can't bend pin(s) back into alignment then possibly you could have a local jeweler or watch repair shop do it for you.

  • Dialog boxes looking strange

    Since the last update to the OS, all of my dialog boxes and even some programs have looked strange. Here are some examples:
    http://cl.ly/1RU
    http://cl.ly/1QF
    http://cl.ly/g5
    Does anyone have any idea what could be going on or how I could go about fixing it?

    I finally had time to reinstall the OS from the DVD. I did not reformat and reinstall, just a reinstall. It did not work, my dialog boxes still look wrong. Does anyone have any other suggestions?

  • [SOLVED] Desktop looks strange after upgrade to Gnome3!

    Hi there,
    I just upgraded my system (about 200 packages) and when I rebooted my Login-Screen looked strange.
    When I logged in the strange screen persisted... Arch told me that Gnome3 couldn't be loaded and
    that this has probably something to do with my graphics hardware.
    This is what it looks like:
    http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/70 … otown.png/
    As you can see my Dekstop looks like shit. Also the WiFi Password isnt saved, which is a minor issue for me.
    But what really sucks is that the system flag is missing!!
    I have no idea how to even start to solve this...
    Please help!!!
    -- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
    Last edited by gunjah292 (2011-05-05 13:03:56)

    gunjah292 wrote:
    I found out the problem, I checked the box in the second tab of the gnome-session-properties! I renamed the /.config directory in my home directory, rebooted than deleted the new .config and named the old one back!
    Now it works again!!
    Sorry to have stolen your time!
    bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647359
    gunjah292 wrote:How can I mark this solved??
    edit the first post.

  • I downloaded Firefox 3.6 and now my tool bar is gone. No back arrows, forward arrows, file, edit, view, history, bookmark, tools....how do I get my web browser to look like a regular browser again?

    I downloaded the new Mozilla web browser and I had a Bing homepage setting. I changed back to yahoo but I ever since downloading I dont have any back arrows, forward arrows, file, edit, view, history, bookmark, tools, address bar....how do I get my web browser to look like a regular browser again?

    For details of how to restore the menus see [https://support.mozilla.com/kb/menu+bar+is+missing]
    Once the menus are back, you can use the View menu, then select Toolbars and click on the names of the toolbars to toggle displaying them.

  • HT1677 In safari browser cookies is working fine. But when I add the browser url to the screen then the cookies concept is not working. In safari setting cookies is always open only. Can you please provide any information regarding to this?

    In safari browser cookies is working fine. But when I add the browser url to the screen then the cookies concept is not working. In safari setting cookies is always open only. Can you please provide any information regarding to this?

    Hello,
    '''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues using Safe Mode|Firefox Safe Mode]] is a troubleshooting mode that turns off some settings and disables most add-ons (extensions and themes).
    ''(If you're using an added theme, switch to the Default theme.)''
    If Firefox is open, you can restart in Firefox Safe Mode from the Help menu by clicking on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item:<br>
    [[Image:FirefoxSafeMode|width=520]]<br><br>
    If Firefox is not running, you can start Firefox in Safe Mode as follows:
    * On Windows: Hold the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
    * On Mac: Hold the '''option''' key while starting Firefox.
    * On Linux: Quit Firefox, go to your Terminal and run ''firefox -safe-mode'' <br>(you may need to specify the Firefox installation path e.g. /usr/lib/firefox)
    ''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
    [[Image:Safe Mode Fx 15 - Win]]
    '''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshoot extensions, themes and hardware acceleration issues to solve common Firefox problems]] article to find the cause.
    ''To exit Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
    When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help others with the same problem.
    Thank you.

  • IWeb export to Dreamweaver - looks strange in Firefox

    Hi,
    I just exported an html file to Dreamweaver of a great design that I made in iWeb.
    I want to keep the design and use more advanced options with dreamweaver that iWeb doesn't have.
    A test with Adobe's browser lab made the design look a little screwy.
    My question is: Are there any sort of guidelines for fixing the html code that iweb spits out to make it more compatible in dreamweaver and also in firefox and internet explorer?
    Thanks in advance.

    iWeb creates webpages that are W3 compliant and compatible with all modern browsers. Even MSIE.
    If Dreamweaver can't handle the code, it's a DW problem.
    Are there any sort of guidelines for fixing the html code.
    You use Dreamweaver, so I assume you are skilled and know how to edit HTML.
    If not : http://www.w3schools.com
    BTW, you don't export to DW, you export to a folder. You open the html files in DW o any HTML editor of your choice.

  • View of PDF file changes or looks strange when opening a file.

    Hi all,
    I have strange problem, that is haunting me.
    A PDF file is created from Microsoft Dynamics AX 2009 system. I guess that Microsoft have their own pdf-writer-engine.
    From time to time, we have seen that the PDF files, on some computers looks correct, on others gibberish.
    One user has a Win7 machine, 32-bit system. 4gb of memory. Today he opened a PDF file from the AX system. When He opened the file on his desktop., it looked fine. After 5 seconds. The entire view changed to strange signs and letters. I opened the same file on a Win-7, 64 bit machine. Everything looks allrigt.  Both of us have Adobe Reader 11.04 installed. one-two houes after the first error, he opened another PDF file. That started to look like gibberish, and after 5 seconds it looked allright.
    In general we only see these types of errors something like 1 out of a hundred times. Most common is that the view is gibberish from the beginning, and never changes.
    Any idea to solve this, will be much appriciated
    /Hector

    I think this is done by the browser when it is saving a temporary file and there's already a file with that exact name in the temp folder.

  • [SOLVED] forms looking strange in opera since upgrade to gnome 3.4

    Hi!
    I just upgraded my gnome installation to gnome 3.4 and now I see some strange rendering effects in opera regarding forms.
    First problem is that text fields now have an inner border. This creates a 3D effect but looks kind of strange because the text overlaps this inner border:
    The second (and more severe) problem is that entries of a drop-down menu disappear when they are hovered:
    I searched through gnome's and opera's theme settings but couldn't find any option that could change this behaviour. I also tried removing the .opera directory but it also didn't help.
    Can anyone confirm these problems and has anyone an idea how to fix it?
    Greetings,
    Michael
    PS: The screenshots were taken in this forum (search form) but can be seen on all other websites with standard forms.
    edit:
    fixed in opera 12 build 1406 (currently beta status and only available on AUR)
    Last edited by Bevan (2012-05-12 12:43:14)

    lucke wrote:Perhaps you have aldabra set as the gtk+ theme in gnome-tweak-tool.
    Good idea, but it's set to Adwaita.
    -- edit:
    ok, this is definately a problem with opera and the new version of Adwaita. If I use the old Adwaita version, that's included in gnome-themes-standard-3.2.1-1, as GTK+ theme both problems are solved. But then other things look weird...
    I reported this to the opera team. A workaround is to set "Dialog Toolkit" to 1 (qt) or 4 (neither gtk nor qt) in opera:config.
    Last edited by Bevan (2012-04-23 20:51:16)

  • Export in fce looks strange

    My QT export in FCE has horizontal lines in it. The movie in the canvas looks fine. What export options do I have to choose?
    Thanks Thomas

    What export function are you using? See what happens if you make the Canvas 100%.

  • Why do Sony DSC-RX100M3 raw files look strange in PE9 when flash has been used in the shot?

    I have just bought a Sony DSC-RX100M3 camera and use it to shoot raw + jpeg.  I want to use the raw files in my Photoshop Elements 9, which has the Camera Raw plug-in version 6.5.0.216 installed. I have downloaded the Adobe DNG converter version 8.7.1.311 so I can import my Sony raw files into PE 9 as they cannot be used directly. Most of the time these raw files look OK, but when I use the flash on my camera and then look at the raw files in PE9 they look far more pink than the corresponding jpeg files. The jpeg files look more or less as I remember the scene when I shot the picture.
    When I look at the same raw and jpeg files in Sony's own Image Data Converter software (version 4.2.04.17270) the raw and jpeg files look very similar to one another, and there is no pink colour cast in the raw file.
    What am I doing wrong in Photoshop Elements? I though the DNG converter keeps all the information from the original raw file and makes no changes to it, so why does the raw file look so different when flash has been used?
    Thanks for any help you can give!
    AVM

    Looking at the pictures of the camera online, I'd say there is no lens shade--a device to keep light from the sides from causing lens flare--and the camera lens, itself, was just too far extended and there was a lens shadow.  You probably can't use the flash that close up and should back off and zoom in further.  Experimenting would give you a sense of what situations will have a shadow of the lens or not.
    Your ACR plug-in is old enough not use have Process Version 2012, yet, only 2010 and 2003 so Adobe didn't have the idea to put the selector down next to the camera profile. The toning options are better with Process 2012 so that would be a reason to upgrade, but I am not sure that the Camera Neutral profile in PSE9 would be different than PSE13.  If Adobe changed the camera profiles then people's pictures would look different once they upgraded to a new version and that's not something that's supposed to happen.
    You can certainly download the PSE13 trial and see if things look any different, but they may not:  Download a free trial or buy Adobe products | Adobe downloads   There would be newer minimum OS version requirements for the newer versions of Adobe software so check those out before trying to install, unless you're on Windows 7+ or OSX 10.8+ then it should be fine.
    One more thing, the White-Balance tint is set to +10 by the camera:
    This As Shot WB is more magenta and even when using the Adobe Standard profile, moving the Tint down to +0 makes things a little more green like your camera JPG.  So there is more than just changing the camera profile that you can do:

Maybe you are looking for