Losing colors on jpeg export

Hello,
  I've got a two color logo that I've laid over the Illustrator TShirt template. The .ai files are fine, but the white portion of my logo is missing in the exported jpeg. Any thoughts are greatly appreciated! Thanks.

Steve,
But if it is it can't be read on Windows.
Maybe not in Worst (or similar but more perfect applications), but it is quite possible in InDesign/Acrobat/Windows Picture and Fax Viewer (at least in XP).
We often had trouble in the old days when Mac people sent CMYK JPEGs to clients.
I gave orders to our designers to prevent it from happening.
Hopefully, at least some of the Mac people are still alive.

Similar Messages

  • JPEG Export Looks Saturated in Internet Explorer

    I see this question in many forums and online but without a solution.
    JPEG exports (sRBG) look overly saturated when viewed in Internet Explorer browser, including when uploading/viewing in Facebook, etc, etc.  In other words, the colors looks different between Lightroom and Internet Explorer.  (Colors looks the same between Lightroom and Photoshop though.)
    As point of reference, when you download a sample JPEG image from Canon EOS's website (used to show sample images from their cameras) you see that those images also use sRGB profile.  They also look exactly the same no matter how you view them (Lightroom, Photoshop, Internet Explorer, Safari, etc.).
    What is Lightroom doing to photos upon export to JPEG and you need Lightroom or Photoshop to see the same colors?
    I saw some talk about it had to do with Lightroom presets and that you had to zero those out?  Any ideas from Windows users?

    Have you got Firefox or Safari on your machine?  In which case, how do the images look in either of those browsers?  Or, if you're using Windows 7, how do the images look in Windows photo viewer?
    Also, can you say what monitor you are using please?
    I think it might be a colour management issue.  Internet Explorer is not colour managed (not even IE9), Lightroom and Photoshop are colour managed, so is Windows 7 photo viewer (but not the XP equivalent), so are Firefox and Safari (but not Chrome).  When there's a difference between how something looks in an non-colour-managed program and colour-manged programs then it's worth checking for colour management issues. 
    If your monitor has a wider gamut than sRGB, then you would expect IE9 and other non-managed programs to look over-saturated. 

  • Lightroom vs jpeg export

    Hi,
    My images do not look the same as the way they appear in lightroom. Seems like they are loosing contrast/shadows.

    Yes I am using sRGB color profile when exporting.
    This is my screenshot of the image in Lightroom vs Jpeg Export on the right.

  • JPEG export preferences problems

    Hi.
    I have indesig cs5.5 and tryed set export resolution and jpeg color space. But in my computer i can't because this properties don't existe.
    In other computer this script read ok.
    below the JPEG export preferences properties.
    The script
    tell application "Adobe InDesign CS5.5"
              tell JPEG export preferences
                        set JPEG export range to export range
                        set Exporting Spread to false
                        set Page String to "2"
                        set export resolution to 72
                        set jpeg color space to RGB
                        set JPEG Quality to low
              end tell
    end tell
    The properties
    {«class jpEr»:72, JPEG Quality:low, Page String:"2", JPEG export range:export range, JPEG Rendering style:baseline encoding, Exporting Spread:false, parent:application "Adobe InDesign CS5.5", object reference:JPEG export preferences of application "Adobe InDesign CS5.5"}
    Thanks

    What was resolution in CS4 became exportResolution in CS5 (and CS5.5). Is it possible you mapped "Adobe InDesign CS5.5" to a CS4 installation on the machine it doesn't work on?
    Also: I'm not an Applescript expert (or even really competent in it), so I'm probably going to embarrass myself, but... Have you tried copying and pasting the script's contents into a new file on the machine where it doesn't work rather than running the (compiled, or whatever) .scpt file?
    Jeff

  • Jpeg export output is 'smudgy' vs Lr develop display

    Hello Gang -
    I've been blaming smudged output on facebook & Flickr - but now I've seen the true culprit !
    My Jpeg export output is quite 'smudgy' vs the Develop display - and even when I use export "Email" default it is still smudgy while the Develop module displays great detail...
    what needs to be tweaked please?
    much thanks ~

    Hello -
    Ok - interesting:
    I imported a jpeg into Lr and it looks very good - long story short - Windows Photo Viewer sucks
    Viewed in Paint - looks good, viewed in FastPictureViewer - looks good.
    Viewed in flickr - Bad.  I'm installing Chrome to see if its a firefox issue
    I use firefox browser, I use sRGB as the export color space (although I see no difference among the 3 default kinds.
    I canot find info as to whether WPV makes use of embedded icc profiles, and after googling and reading - I have not found info as to how I would know if I am "even including an embedded profile with the files"
    Flickr and Facebook display my jpegs exactly as I see them in Windows Photo Viewer - which is different from how I see it in Lr's Develop Module - in that dark brown & blacks look smudgy with much reduced detail
    Bob_Peters wrote:
    Does Win7 "Window Photo Viewer" make use of embedded icc profiles?
    What color space are you using for the exported JPEG files?  Are you even including an embedded profile with the files?
    What do Flickr and Facebook do when confronted with an image containing a color profile?
    What browser are you using to view the Flickr and Facebook images?

  • Color change after exporting from Lightroom

    I noticed a drastic color change after exporting a file from Lightroom to a JPEG file today. I have been using Lightroom for a while, and it never happened before. I am assuming that I changed the setting somehow and I cannot find how to fix it.
    Here is the original.
    After exporting to a JPEG. The color is so drastically different. I tried both sRGB and AdobeRGB and they turn out to have the same problem.
    It is not as clear as JPEG files, but edited files with Photoshop CS5 also looks slightly different viewed on Lightroom.
    I would appreciate it if anyone could help me.  Thank you so much for your help!

    Thanks everyone for looking into my problem!
    >Can you upload a sample of each
    >* Raw File
    >* XMP Sidecar
    >* Exported JPEG
    I somehow can't find XMP sidecar files in my folders.... So instead, I exported the JPEG file to the 2nd JPEG file, hoping you can compare those two JPEG files.
    The colors get lighter and lighter every time I export the files. I uploaded those files (RAW, 1st JPEG, 2nd JPEG) on line. I also changed the file samples from the original post because I can't add watermarks.
    I checked my flles, but there is no preset applied to the JPEGs.
    I am thinking of unistallng Lightroom and reinstalling it and see what happens.
    Thanks!
    1. The data of the RAW file: http://yuko-hirao-photo.hechtmail.com/others/DSC00530.ARW
    2. Data of the GPEG exported from the RAW: http://yuko-hirao-photo.hechtmail.com/others/DSC00530test_upload_01.jpg
    3. Data of the JPEG exported from above JPEG: http://yuko-hirao-photo.hechtmail.com/others/DSC00530test_upload_01test_upload_01.jpg

  • Aperture vs Adobe Lightroom (Beta 3) JPEG exports

    I've been beta-testing the Adobe Lightroom product and comparing it to Aperture. I'm using Aperture 1.1.1 on a MacBook Pro.
    Lightroom has some intriguing features, but I've noticed a wildly different color when exporting the same image to JPEG format from Lightroom and Aperture.
    I took the same RAW image from a shot I took with my Nikon D70 and exported a JPEG from Aperture using default settings with no color adjustment. In Lightroom I exported the same image to Photoshop, and then exported a JPEG with default settings and no color adjustment.
    Look at the difference:
    https://www.carsonmedia.com/projects/softballphotos/phototests/photocomparison.h tml
    Can anyone explain the difference? Aperture seems to export a JPEG that resembles the original.
    I'm perplexed at the difference.
    --Brandon
    15" MBP 2GB RAM OSX/XP   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

    Yeah, looks like a colorspace issue -- I'm guessing Pro Photo, but it might not be LR's fault. Last I checked, LR actually exports PSDs, not JPEGs, in Pro Photo space to PS. So 2 possibilities:
    1. LR incorrectly tagged the PSD output, so PS doesn't realize it's Pro Photo.
    2. You didn't do a colorspace coversion in PS before saving the JPEG. Try using 'save to web' in PS -- it usually takes care of the sRGB conversion for you. Does it look correct in PS before the JPEG export?

  • Lightroom JPEG export VS Photoshop Image Processor

    Hey guys:
    Long time photoshop and lightroom user (long time user of all things Adobe). First post here in the forums. I did a search for my question but I think it was too specific, so it returned zero results.
    My question is about Lightroom's JPEG export vs Photoshops Image Processor. When I export a RAW file to JPEG from Lightroom, the file size is freaking huge. The JPEG is as big as my original RAW file (~25mb). Settings are set to default - 100 quality. Everything else remains untouched.
    However, when I use Photoshop's image processor (I launch it through Bridge, easier that way for me) and process the RAW images that way, my JPEGs are roughly 5-10mb in size. Settings in Image Processor are quality 10 and thats it. No actions being run or anything.
    Can anyone shed some light as to why Lightroom exports JPEGs that are roughly 2-4 times the size of Photoshop's JPEGs? My initial thoughts are that the 100 quality setting in Lightroom is more like Photoshop's quality 12 (that always makes me think of Spinal Tap - "Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?" "These go to eleven.") Ideally, exporting out of Lightroom would be much easier for my workflow.
    Thanks in advance.
    -The Doctor

    DrMilesBennell wrote:
    Can anyone shed some light as to why Lightroom exports JPEGs that are roughly 2-4 times the size of Photoshop's JPEGs? My initial thoughts are that the 100 quality setting in Lightroom is more like Photoshop's quality 12 (that always makes me think of Spinal Tap - "Why don't you just make ten louder and make ten be the top number and make that a little louder?" "These go to eleven.") Ideally, exporting out of Lightroom would be much easier for my workflow.
    You are correct: LR Quality 100 = PS Quality 12
    Despite LR having 101 Quality settings (0 to 100) it actually only has 12 Quality settings the same as PS 'Baseline Standard':
    JPEG Quality Setting Comparison
    PS
    LR
    LR Range
    Typical Reduction
    0
    0
    0-7%
    11%
    1
    10
    8-15%
    23%
    2
    20
    16-23%
    14%
    3
    30
    24-30%
    14%
    4
    35
    31-38%
    16%
    5
    40
    39-46%
    24%
    6
    50
    47-53%
    4%
    7
    55
    54-61%
    27%
    8
    65
    62-69%
    25%
    9
    70
    70-76%
    31%
    10
    80
    77-84%
    35%
    11
    90
    85-92%
    41%
    12
    100
    93-100%
    I keep a small copy of the above table taped to my monitor. I chose the numbers under the 'LR' column for the 12 steps (not AA's) to make it easier to remember. In actuality ANY number in the LR Range column will produce the same results for each step.
    Under the 'Typical Reduction' column notice the small amount of reduction for PS 6 (LR 47-53%) Quality setting. If interested why AND why you probably shouldn't use PS 7 (LR 54-61%) Quality setting see this post:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/5641903#5641903

  • Changing default color scheme when exporting ALV report to Excel spreadshee

    Hi all,
    We have a bunch of FI reports created using OOPS in abap.  Each of the reports has the functionality to be exported to an excel spreadsheet.  When exporting to Excel, the headers are a very dark brown color, making them difficult to read and it has been requested that they are shaded a lighter color.  I have not defined any sort of color scheme within the report itself, and I was wondering if there was a way to change the color scheme when exporting the report to excel.  Let me know if there is anything that can be done, thanks!

    check ur fcat

  • JPEG exports - "optimize to file size"

    just saw this tucked away in somebody's lengthy post, but i think it merits its own thread.
    it would be very useful, and isnt very difficult, to implement a jpeg export option for auto-setting the quality slider based on "desired file size".
    for instance, my web products need jpegs w/ a max of 800k. in PS, i have to dork around w/ the preview sliders to get this. in LR, there isnt a way. preferred for both would be UI for inputting the desired size and let the cpu do its job.
    this would rock.
    thanks
    matt

    Yes. Generally speaking, would be nice to know the exported file size in terms of MB / KB, in addition to pixel dimensions which are already there.
    Gilles.

  • Adding crop marks in jpeg export

    Hi All,
    Is is possible to add crop marks in jpeg export similar to what we have in pdf export.
    I see SnapshotUtils class but could not see any method to set crop marks.
    What I need to do to set crop marks?
    Regards,
    Alam

    Well, since there is no Crop Marks option when doing a JPEG Export (Snapshot) by hand, I would be very surprised if there were a plug-in API for it.
    So I think you'll have to add your own Crop Marks before you do the JPEG Export. It isn't really that hard ... just a little tedious. You can get the general idea from the CropMarks.jsx script that comes with InDesign.

  • How to turn of specific spot (pantone) colors before i export the document to pdf and these selected colours will not included in pdf...

    Hello, i have one question. Please help me with indesign... i have prepared photoshop document with pantone color in channel pallete... This photoshop file i have imported in indesign document and when i export it from indesign to pdf so color (pantone) overlay over cmyk... i have pantone color just for parcial paint not for proof for customer.
    For example: i need to disable all pantone colors before i export document into pdf file. It is very clear process what i need to do but without find some solution. I know about pallete preview in window/output/... in indesign but this do not fix it! Please help.

    Ok... i understand to overprint process... i have spot color (pantone) in imported image because of preparation to partial varnish... but i'm wondering how can i export the indesign document to pdf without the spot color which recolores my design recolored and i can't it send to customer...
    Only way how can i figure out is to delete spot channel in photoshop? This is very annoying and useless prosess
    i look at this threat:
    Photoshop images with spot channels in Indesign CS6 (layout question)
    and there is some answer to my question!
    I have maked a problem when i set the spot color in photoshop for parcial with some pantone pink color! and this was the problem! I haven't known that i can set white spot color (lab color) and use it in indesign invisible nad in exported pdf too!!! this is what i exactly want!

  • JPEG Export Problem

    A few days ago, someone was commenting on funny square boxes in JPEG exports that occurred at places with spot touch up was performed. I have now experienced the same problem with a single touch up.
    D70 RAW file-->single spot touch up-->export to a hi-resolution (best possible) JPEG--> ugly spot at site of touch up.
    image available at www.printroom.com/pro/e2photo in gallery "aperture"
    The previous thread was locked, but I never saw an answer to the problem
    G5 iMac OS 10.4.3
    any help would be greatly appreciated
    steven

    hi. apologies for delay in responding - have been trying to find some time to do some testing
    i removed and re-installed the mogrify plugin and this seemed to do the trick. i couldn't replicate with the standard export, so i assume it was just a mogrify issue

  • Jpeg-export - metafile error - errorcode 2 or errorcode 0

    Hello,
    i want to export my Report-Sheet as an jpeg from an serial analysis for every step. After the first step the jpeg-export fails with following error message: (in german) "Es befindet sich keinMetafile in der Zwischenablage. Fehlercode 2" or in english: "there are no metafile at the clipboard. error code 2" the failing command looks like this:
    for i = 1 to 12
    Call PICEXPORT("D:\MFriedrich\" & messname & "Kraftanzeige_" & k & "0kmh.JPG","JPEG",1,1024,,"RGB 24 YUV 444",100,"JPEG",0)
    next
    The files and folders do exist.
    What can i do? I seems, that a temporary picture will not be create at the clipboard.
    DIAdem 9.10.2345 ServicePack 2b
    WinXP
    Modul: Diadem-Script

    Hello!
    I tried by my computer and could export in a for loop the Report in a JPEG without any error.
    Could you post the whole code you are doing in the loop?
    So I can try do reproduce the problem
    Regards
    Ken

  • JPEG Export fails in some way

    Hello guys,
    we have developed a JPEG Export Plugin for InDesign server that worked fine for several years now, never having any problems. Now a strange issue occur and I need some help. When exporting an preview image of one page (containing textframes with text and tables) the preview image is correct if the dpi is smaller than 72 dpi (100% in our application). But when the dpi is equal or greater than 72 the text appears correctly on the image but the tables are missing. This problem occurs on CS4 but not on CS5 server, but there is no difference between the plugin implementation (beside the changes that were obligatory for porting the plugin to CS5). Maybe this is a known issue or someone has solution for it?
    Here is the difference between the exported images (smaller than 72 dpi and greater or equal 72 dpi):

    I do move some photos to OnOne or PS (for editing), then back to Aperture. In Aperture I would select-all (click) the photos I wanted to send to Sam's for printing then drag the selected items (all at the same time) onto the Sam's web site for processing/priniting. Another thought - on occassion I would have to switch-out flash-cards during shooting.
    Ah there you go both pieces of the puzzle solved.
    You're getting the Tiff files in Aperture from the use of the external editor. In the Aperture->Preferences->Export window is the settings for what file type to use with an external editor I'm sure your setting is Tiff.
    And then by dragging the file out of Aperture rather then exporting it you are getting the Tiff.
    IMPORTANT Point:
    By dragging the files out of Aperture you are not really exporting them you are getting the Aperture generated preview (or in the case of the Tiff files the original). The settings in the  Export window have NO effect on the image when you drag it out. In all likelihood you are not getting the size and/or resolution you think you are.
    You should be exporting the versions by using the Export Versions button in the Export window. Once the versions are exported to a folder on your disk you can then drag those to the print web site. This will ensure you are getting the image size and resolution you want.
    regards

Maybe you are looking for