LOSING SHARPENING AND NOISE ON EXPORT

My workflow goes like this:
I use LR3 to apply adjustments, occasionally a preset from say VSCO....
While in LR I use, PHOTO > EDIT This photo in - PHOTOSHOP
I do my edits, ADD NOISE, SHARPEN....
Then PHOTO > SAVE AS.....
I save the photo to my external...
Here is the issue, when I re-open LR the photo is then present in my Catalog and there in LR to be viewed.... from here I export the final size for web etc and I am done
QUESTION IS:  The photo that is now within my LR catalog is missing the NOISE I am added completely, and the SHARPENING is gone, or much less sharp then the photo I have saved in PS.
HELP
Thank you very much

In the PS-forum version of this message you said you were using LR3 with PS-CS3.  This is important.
Because your PS is two versions older than LR, the ACR is not compatible, so using Edit In PS will create a TIF or PSD on the way INTO PS, right?  This TIF or PSD is what is in LR—the one before you’ve done anything to the image in PS.  When you do a Save As you are putting the results with your sharpening and noise in another location that LR won’t know about, right?  What happens if you save your output from PS over the top of the file that LR created on the way into PS instead of somewhere else, or are you already saving over the top of your PS input file and wondering why LR doesn’t show the changes?  
The second issue is that the communication between LR and PS.  Without that communication LR has no idea where you did your Save As to.  I believe your PS-CS3 is too old to know how to communicate anything to LR—Adobe hadn’t implemented the integration back in LR1 days when CS3 was current.
If you had LR3 sending images to PS-CS5 or LR4 sending to PS-CS6 then things would be compatible and communicating and would work how you expect.

Similar Messages

  • Missing Sharpen and Noise Reduction palettes

    I've just exported some pictures for the web from Lightroom 5 which had to be downsized considerably. I now find that the sharpening and noise reduction palette has disappeared entirely from the right hand tools panel. What's going on? I've tried quitting and re-opening Lightroom and also shutting down and restarting my computer. (Macbook Pro retina and Mountain Lion)

    If you are talking about the Panel in Develop, right click on any panel header and make sure that Detail is checked.

  • Base Sharpening and Noise Reduction D800/E

    Has anyone set up a base sharpening and noise reduction at different ISOs for the D800/E?
    I had LR all set up for my D300 and D700 so the base settings where used at import.
    Now I need to do it with the D800E and was wondering what others might be using.
    Thanks
    Jim

    Order doesn't matter in Lightroom.

  • Sharpening and noise in ACR 6.3.... advice please

    Hi,
    Where can I find some good tutorial stuff (or other advices) about sharpening and noise in ACR 6.3.
    My camera is a Panasonic DMC-FZ8.
    Adjustments like color / blacks / contrast I can "see" on my screen (I'm satisfied until now).
    But Noise and Sharpening..... "that is a different kettle of fish " .... I have problems with it ... complex....(my std JPG is better than the RAW-JPG).

    Rules of thumb are usually made to be broken.  They might provide a good starting strategy in many cases.
    The thread I referred to is:  http://forums.adobe.com/thread/780678
    I re-read it and it doesn't have that much more info in it.
    Keep in mind there's nothing fundamentally wrong with an image file getting larger.  If you're short on disk space, new disks are incredibly cheap nowadays.
    A good rule of thumb (!!) is don't save, then open, then resave JPEG files.  You can do it once or twice in a pinch, but the compression artifacts will accumulate, as JPEG does lossy compression.
    If a PSD file is growing larger from save to save, it may be because you are doing something to the image to cause that - e.g., creating new layers, or sharpening it and increasing the amount of apparent detail the compression process has to deal with.
    -Noel

  • Disabling Sharpening and Noise Reduction

    Hello. I have Lightroom 1.2. I have over a 1,000 images to process. How can I disable sharpening and noise reduction for all of them without having to click that little detail box for each of the images. I use Noiseware for noise reduction and Focalblade for sharpening. If there is something in a folder within Lightroom I can delete to remove sharpening forever, please let me know. Of course, I want to perform the other corrections in Lightroom as necessary. Thank you.
    Francis

    Jao, Thank you. I have asked this question elsewhere before. I have recieved replies, maybe I did not follow the directions properly, but they never worked. The sharpening would be disableduntil I went to make another correction. Then back to sharpening Lightroom would go. Your way, sharpening is disabled for all the images and stays that way. Thanks again.
    Francis

  • Sharpening and noise defaults in the Develop Module

    Capture Sharpness
    I’m getting my head around sharpening and am of the understanding that there are three distinct phases: Capture Sharpening, Creative Sharpening and Output sharpening
    With regards to Capture Sharpening I’ve noticed that when I import a CR2 file into Lightroom 3.6 there is an Adobe pre-set in the Develop Module. Is this a form of Capture Sharpening default?
    Sharpening
    Amount: 25
    Radius: 1.0
    Detail: 25
    Noise Reduction
    Luminance: 0
    Colour: 25
    Detail: 50

    In Lr, "capture" sharpening is global sharpening, and "creative" sharpening is local sharpening (or sharpen masking on global basis but tailored to the image), or at least that's one way of looking at it.
    in other words, if you're sharpening raw data non-destructively, such that first round of sharpening isn't being baked in, there is no need to separate capture sharpening from creative sharpening, in your mind, or in the software you use.
    Put another way, the notion of capture sharpening comes from days when first round of sharpening was baked in, e.g. shooting jpegs, or in raw workflows where first pass yields a baseline tiff, and 2nd pass is artist's choice...
    That said, what's needed for artistic sharpening (creative effects) can differ from what's need for baseline sharpening (initial "capture" sharpening, if you will).
    Capture sharpening: just make stuff look reasonably sharp, since without it things don't.
    Creative sharpening: sky's the limit... - some people consider Clarity to be a form of creative sharpening...
    Note: since Lr's sharpening settings can't be varied (there is no way to apply high-radius sharpening in one region, and low-radius sharpening in another), and since its algorithm is aimed primarily at countering inherent and/or subtle/limited unsharpness, some people consider Lr's sharpening to be "capture-only". On the other hand, capture sharpening is, almost by definition, global, so since Lr supports local sharpening, and sharpen masking, those aspects can be considered "creative".
    In my opinon, it's best not to get too hung up on semantics/terminology, but in a nutshell, conceptually:
    * Capture sharpening needs to be done so stuff looks reasonably sharp, and is often done across the board, not dependent on image content (this is why most people apply a default amount of sharpening in Lightroom).
    * Creative sharpening is going beyond initial/default sharpening, generally on an image-by-image basis, although not necessarily. Note: it may involve removing all global "capture" sharpening in favor of no sharpening, or local sharpening only (raw data required).
    * Output sharpening depends on resolution and medium etc, and therefore needs to be done last - tailored to output device and such..
    Sorry if this post had too high of an answer to question ratio .
    Rob

  • Edge sharpening and noise: your settings?

    I am experimenting with edge sharpening. I have a couple of questions.
    1. How to lift and stamp JUST the edge sharpening? From the HUD it looks like all the adjustment settings get applied? (Do I need to do anything else but highlight the edge sharpening in the HUD before stamping)?
    2. What do you like for portraits as a setting in edge sharpening?
    3. What settings for noise reduction? My latest shoot has all kinds of noise (concert photography) due to 1600 ISO.
    Any advice welcome here! Thanks so much!

    1. All the settings under Adjustments will be stamped, at this point is not possible to select only one adjustment. If you are gonna apply the same settings to few images you can untick the boxes of the adjustments you don't want to copy to other images, then lift the adjustments (only those with the box ticked will be lifted) and stamp it to the others.
    2. Edge sharpening is a great tool, the best is to experiment and find the results you like. That depends on many factors as the type of photography, lenses used and even personal taste. Have a look at this document:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=304536
    3. I don't find noise reduction in aperture any great. Only chroma blur for removing colour noise. At ISO 1600 2.5 setting in chroma blur does the job. Before printing I always bring the image to Photoshop and use Noiseware Professional, which gives great results.

  • Are sharpening and noise reduction working in 1.0?

    I went to see if they'd made any improvements in the noise reduction area, and can't get any of the noise reduction or sharpening settings to effect the image at all. The settings definitely aren't making any changes to the visible image in normal or 100% view.
    I tested this on an ISO1600 image to make sure there was visible noise.
    Is anyone else seeing this lack of effect?

    The server may think it's serving that page to some user-agents, but it ain't working for any over here:
    $ curl -o file.jpeg -v http://learningtosee.org/aux_photos/sharpening_test.jpg
    * About to connect() to learningtosee.org port 80
    * Trying 204.16.138.5... * connected
    * Connected to learningtosee.org (204.16.138.5) port 80
    > GET /aux_photos/sharpening_test.jpg HTTP/1.1
    User-Agent: curl/7.12.2 (i386-pc-win32) libcurl/7.12.2 zlib/1.2.1
    Host: learningtosee.org
    Pragma: no-cache
    Accept: */*
    < HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
    < Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 21:31:06 GMT
    < Server: Apache/2.0.52 (CentOS)
    < Vary: Accept-Encoding
    < Content-Length: 311
    < Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
    % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
    Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
    100 311 100 311 0 0 2159 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0
    * Connection #0 to host learningtosee.org left intact
    * Closing connection #0
    $

  • Why am I losing text and background when exporting from InDesign?

    Hi, I am VERY new to graphic design & working with InDesign for the first time.  When I export... to pdf, the 2nd page of my 3 page indesign document loses several (but not all) text boxes and the background.  Anyone know why this is?? PLEASE HELP!! this is time-sensitive!! Thanks so much in advance!!

    Layer set to not print? Some description of the file and contents as well as the OS and version and the version of ID would be of help.

  • Sharpening and noise reduction

    This question was posted in response to the following article: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/lightroom/using/WS67a9e0c3a11b149632d4213d12864349b1a-8000.htm l

    Order doesn't matter in Lightroom.

  • Noise, Sharpening and ACR

    I have recently switched from processing my raw files from Aperture to Adobe Camera Raw 4.4.1. I shoot landscapes with the Canon 1Ds Mark III, low ISO, and wish to make very large prints (30-50"). After reading "Real World Camera Raw with CS3" it seems like the authors say that capture sharpening can be accomplished in ACR instead of what I was doing right after Aperture (with sharpening off)- that is, using Ninja Noise and then capture sharpen with Photokit Sharpener. But if I now capture sharpen in ACR I won't be able to use Ninja Noise since one should not sharpen noise. Right? So does this mean that if I capture sharpen in ACR that I should also use ACR's Noise Reduction? Or should I turn off ACR's Sharpening and Noise Reduction and do as I did before - use Ninja and PhotoKit sharpening after raw processing? (I hope this makes sense - I'm still learning the basics). Also any rough settings for what I'm doing would be very helpful. Thanks in advance.

    >Not at all. There's ABSOLUTELY nothing wrong with that workflow. I would recommend it myself.
    >[EDIT] except I prefer Noise Ninja most of the time, and Noiseware in a few cases.
    I've discussed this matter with Gordon on another thread, but a few points are worth repeating here. On page 157 of his Image Sharpening with Adobe Photoshop PSCS2, Bruce Fraser states, "Always do noise reduction before sharpening. If you sharpen, you'll almost certainly make the noise worse; the noise reduction tool will have to work harder, and will probably wipe out the sharpening you did anyway."
    Most noise reduction tools do not eliminate noise but merely make it less visible. When you sharpen after noise reduction, some or much of the noise may reappear. If you do the sharpening first, this problem is eliminated, but the effect of your sharpening may also be wiped out.
    Sharpening and noise reduction are basically inverse processes and work against another. Some of these problems may be eased with the use of masks. You can use a surface mask during noise reduction to help confine the NR to smooth areas where the noise is most noticeable and keep the NR away from the edges where sharpness would suffer. Similarly, you can use an edge mask during sharpening to help confine the sharpening to the edges.
    That said, Noise Ninja can work reasonably well on JPEG images that have been sharpened in camera as they often are. In this case, one has to use a different noise profile for the best results.
    Bill

  • Question re Order of Sharpening and NR

    Hello all,
    Very quick question regarding order of sharpening and noise reduction. Is NR only supposed to be used to deal with sensor noise (like high ISO noise)? I ask because sharpening obviously introduces noise, which then could be tamed with NR (decreasing sharpness though, right?), but do you really want to do that? Are you supposed to do NR first, then sharpen up and live with the noise introduced therein?
    Thanks, and I apologize for the stupid question!
    Almost forgot--I do NOT have LR storing metadata in XMP files automatically (the checkbox in the catalog settings), but I noticed that after editing and adding metadata to photos, LR creates XMPs anyway. This confused me, but I checked the folder a little while later and noticed that all the XMPs are gone. Does LR temporarily create the XMPs before its stores in info in the catalog?
    Thanks!
    f1fan

    The order in which you do things in Lightroom is meaningless...Lightroom processes images in its own order which has nothing to do with the order you set parameters.
    And yes, Noise Reduction and Sharpening are really interrelated. It could be argued you shouldn't do one without doing the other. Noise Reduction is off by default but even well exposed low ISO images may need noise reduction to optimize the image when proper sharpening is applied.

  • How can I export files from my ipod classic and reset it without losing content and syncing it to a new library?

    I'm trying to export the files that exist on an ipod classic. It belongs to my girlfriend, and she doesn't want to lose any of the music on it. But she wants to sync to a new PC and not lose the content. So, I want to export all the files and then place those files plus start a new itunes library with it. If I were to sync to my PC, would it erase all of the existing data? Can I buy/download a program that would allow me to upload all of the existing content on her ipod classic to my PC and then take that and place it back on by syncing it through her new laptop and adding the exported files....?

    See this older post from another forum member Zevoneer covering the different methods and software available to assist you with the task of copying content from your iPod back to your PC and into iTunes.
    https://discussions.apple.com/thread/2452022?start=0&tstart=0
    B-rock

  • Noise on export

    New development engine is really great, but there is an issue which did exist in LR3 and got much stronger in LR4 beta, Very often the image visible in Develop module looks much better noise wise than the one which is exported out. Take a look at the example below: the top half is a fragment from the exported image and the bottom one is a screen shot from LR4. It takes a few trial and fail attempts to get the export image right and when it is right the one in LR4 looks much darker than needed.

    But multiple people have found out that sRGB and AdobeRGB soft proofing look exactly like the ProPhoto RGB image in the develop view on a wide gamut monitor. The histogram and the gamut warnings seem to be OK though. But the actual output is bogus.
    Here is the original thread for reference:
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4129113#4129113
    This is only for softproofing though and not for export. Export to sRGB works fine AFAICT. Getting back to the orginal issue, my guess is that Peter is looking at the im age in Develop in Fit or in Fill. You cannot judge the actual noise reduction applied there. You have to be zoomed in to 1:1 to see it correctly. The basic reason is that a different scaling algorithm is used for the Fit/Fill display than you get upon export. This is done to make Lightroom's develop module not even slower than it already is as the only way ot do the preview zoomed out reliably is to render the entire image and then scale down. Since noody wants to wait 5-10 seconds after updting a single slider, the Develop preview in Fit/Fill is rendered from a subsampled subset of the data. At higher zoom all the data is used but only for the area you are looking at. This causes that you should judge noise and sharpening only at 1:1 or higher.

  • Photos not saved after sharpening and denoising-shows on screen correctly but when am trying to email it, does not reflect the changes?

    I have tried to change pic's like sharpen and de-noise features, on screen ot shows all perfect, but when I try to email them, all the changes are lost, anyone can help with the same?
    Thanks in advance.

    Make sure you are viewing your image at 100%. At smaller views, pixels and layers and the way they interact are approximate interpolations and won't show you the actual pixel-for-pixel changes.

Maybe you are looking for