Lots of  trace file generated in udump dir at the propagation target site

about 5 minutes per file,what can i to do to disable it?
trace file sample:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
ORACLE_HOME = /oraps/product/10.2.0
System name: SunOS
Node name: BjYwDbserver
Release: 5.10
Version: Generic_118833-03
Machine: sun4u
Instance name: zgs
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 19
Unix process pid: 3885, image: oraclezgs@BjYwDbserver
*** SERVICE NAME:(zgs.psmis) 2006-11-30 02:17:35.629
*** SESSION ID:(267.13934) 2006-11-30 02:17:35.629
*** Destination Propagation Status ***
Source Q Name :"STRMADMIN"."STREAMS_CAPTURE_Q"
Destination :HUAD.PSMIS
Hwm : 517894
Dest Q Name :"STRMADMIN"."STREAMS_APPLY_HUAD_Q" Hwm : 517894 Ack : 51
7894
LsM : 517894
LsP : 163197
--------------------------------------------------

Hi,
I have seen this issue on 10.2.0.2 too.
This tracing is on by default and you have to put in some cron job to remove the trace files.
Regards
Fairlie Rego
www.el-caro.blogspot.com

Similar Messages

  • 10053 - no trace file generated

    Hi,
    no 10053 trace file is generated in the diag directory.
    sql_trace = true
    trace_enabled = true
    i set
    ALTER SESSION SET TRACEFILE_IDENTIFIER = 'TEST';
    ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS='10053 trace name context forever, level 1';
    but there is no trace file generated.
    Something seems to be missing.
    Any help would be much appreciated!
    Best Regards
    user11368124

    thanks for your messages.
    @Dom Brooks
    the Oracle release is 11.2 running on Ubuntu.
    Added flushing pool. That statement was missing.
    But unfortunately the 10053 trace file is still not generated.
    i am running the following query mentioned in the article "Examining the Oracle Database 10053 Trace Event Dump File" of Steve Callan:
    alter system set TRACE_ENABLED = true;
    alter system set SQL_TRACE = true;
    alter session set statistics_level=all;
    --alter session set max_dump_file_size = unlimited;
    --oradebug setmypid
    --oradebug unlimit
    --oradebug event 10053 trace name context forever, level 1
    ALTER SESSION SET TRACEFILE_IDENTIFIER = 'TEST';
    alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
    alter session set events '10053 trace name context forever, level 1';
    -- plan_table exists
    select * from plan_table
    -- flushing pool
    alter system flush shared_pool;
    explain plan for
    SELECT ch.channel_class,
    c.cust_city,
    t.calendar_quarter_desc,
    SUM(s.amount_sold) sales_amount
    FROM sh.sales s,
    sh.times t,
    sh.customers c,
    sh.channels ch
    WHERE s.time_id = t.time_id
    AND s.cust_id = c.cust_id
    AND s.channel_id = ch.channel_id
    AND c.cust_state_province = 'CA'
    AND ch.channel_desc in ('Internet','Catalog')
    AND t.calendar_quarter_desc IN ('1999-01','1999-02')
    GROUP BY ch.channel_class, c.cust_city, t.calendar_quarter_desc
    ORDER by 1,2,3,4;
    Best Regards
    user11368124

  • Do you know Timmings for trace files generated?

    Hi,
    I have done some sql traceing using DBMS_MONITOR package.
    We can also enable SQL traceing using DBMS_SESSION.
    I want to generate sql trace file for "particuler part of application".
    When i did that i got some sql trace files,, now that "particuler part of application" was over application was idle..
    but as time goes these files are still populating in size means they are still sql traceing going on...
    My question is when and how trace files are generated?
    Do you have idea???
    Thanks and Regards,
    Rushang Kansara
    Message was edited by:
    Rush

    also what content of my sql trace file should i
    consider for exacly tracing that "particuler part of
    application".
    Rushang
    Parse Count To Execute Ratio
    Take the numbers of parse count and divide it by numbers of time execute count if it is 1 then it means you are parsing the same statment everytime,If this ratio is 1 then it will latch the shared SQL area which will degrade the overall performance.Like if you execute a query which is using bind variable and this query is at yours front end level trigger (Forms) POST_QUERY then it will show you (parse count=execute count) which shows you are parsing for every triggering event which is bad ,for that you should put this seqeuel within PL/SQL procedure which cache the cursor and will turn in (parse count<Execute Count).
    Large Diffrence Between Elasped Time And CPU Time
    If this diffrence (Elapsed time[b]-CPU time)>1 then it means you are spending yours time in for waiting resources this waiting resources will in turn wait events e.g some one updated the row and dont realease by COMMIT or ROLBACK and the same span of time you want to update then you will see a lock in tkprof result in wait event section.If you read the data from hard disk (as first time you issue it reads from HD and then put into buffer cache during this reading a latch is grabed and will not let you read this data until you perform the alls read from HD to buffer cache this will also show you in wait events which is cache buffers chain
    Fetch Calls
    If yours Fetch calls=Rows then it means you are not using Bulk fetch and yours this code will take a lot of roundtrips which will in turn jam the network.
    Disk Count
    If every time yours disk count=current + query mode then you are reading alls block from disk alls the time ,usually oracle read once from disk and put it into SGA and should be found in SGA second time.
    And there is many more...depend on yors environemnt setup but above are common.
    As you said its reproducing the tkprof again and again ,make sure you terminate the session or you explicitly turn off the tracer by
    ALTER SESSION SET SQL_TRACE=FALSE Khurram

  • Too many trace files generated by program ORACLE.EXE (J001) in "bdump"

    Hi,
    Please help!
    the following trace file messages have been created in my "bdump" folder about every 6 minutes, so it generates about 200 files per hours. Can someone tell me how to solve the error or stop the trace files be generated. Thanks.
    Windows thread id: 5520, image: ORACLE.EXE (J001)
    *** 2009-05-22 12:49:21.372
    *** ACTION NAME:() 2009-05-22 12:49:21.372
    *** MODULE NAME:() 2009-05-22 12:49:21.372
    *** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2009-05-22 12:49:21.372
    *** SESSION ID:(312.292) 2009-05-22 12:49:21.372
    java.io.IOException: service early exit: code=1 : err=The system cannot find the path specified.
    : out=
    at oracle.wh.runtime.server.Util.execRuntimeService(Util.java:122)
    CJ

    No version number and not enough information in what you posted to help you.
    Did this just start?
    If so what actions preceded it?
    Or is this a new install?
    Have you tried bouncing the instance?
    If it were my system I would have already searched the knowledgebase at metalink and opened an SR if I couldn't find a solution. Did you?

  • Large number of trace files generated

    Many of the following trace files are being generted throughout the day, sometimes 4/5 per minute
    There is nothing in the alert log
    Any ideas?
    Many Thanks in advance
    Dump file e:\oracle\admin\nauti1\udump\nauti1_ora_5552.trc
    Tue Nov 18 17:36:11 2008
    ORACLE V10.2.0.4.0 - Production vsnsta=0
    vsnsql=14 vsnxtr=3
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Windows Server 2003 Version V5.2 Service Pack 2
    CPU : 4 - type 586, 4 Physical Cores
    Process Affinity : 0x00000000
    Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:2045M/3839M, Ph+PgF:3718M/5724M, VA:649M/2047M
    Instance name: nauti1
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
    Oracle process number: 32
    Windows thread id: 5552, image: ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)
    *** ACTION NAME:() 2008-11-18 17:36:11.432
    *** MODULE NAME:(Nautilus.Exe) 2008-11-18 17:36:11.432
    *** SERVICE NAME:(nauti1) 2008-11-18 17:36:11.432
    *** SESSION ID:(130.42066) 2008-11-18 17:36:11.432
    KGX cleanup...
    KGX Atomic Operation Log 342CD2A4
    Mutex 452CC5F8(130, 0) idn 0 oper EXAM
    Cursor Parent uid 130 efd 17 whr 26 slp 0
    oper=DEFAULT pt1=00000000 pt2=00000000 pt3=00000000
    pt4=00000000 u41=0 stt=0
    KGX cleanup...
    KGX Atomic Operation Log 342CD2A4
    Mutex 452CC5F8(130, 0) idn 0 oper EXAM
    Cursor Parent uid 130 efd 17 whr 26 slp 0
    oper=DEFAULT pt1=48265D6C pt2=48265E68 pt3=48265D3C
    pt4=00000000 u41=0 stt=0
    Dump file e:\oracle\admin\nauti1\udump\nauti1_ora_5552.trc
    Sat Nov 22 12:52:32 2008
    ORACLE V10.2.0.4.0 - Production vsnsta=0
    vsnsql=14 vsnxtr=3
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    Windows Server 2003 Version V5.2 Service Pack 2
    CPU : 4 - type 586, 4 Physical Cores
    Process Affinity : 0x00000000
    Memory (Avail/Total): Ph:2070M/3839M, Ph+PgF:3896M/5724M, VA:673M/2047M
    Instance name: nauti1
    Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
    Oracle process number: 29
    Windows thread id: 5552, image: ORACLE.EXE (SHAD)

    Check out metalink bug description for Bug 6638558

  • Trace files generated for every session in 11g

    Hi
    I have two databases - both 11.1.0.7, both on RHEL5
    Database A runs on Server A
    Database B runs on Server B
    Both installation of 11g and each database are new installations.
    On Database A a trace file is being created for every session in ADR_HOME.../trace.
    On Database B - this is not happening
    The problem I have is Database A. As every session connection creates a trace file (or 2 - being *.trc and *trm), at the end of the day we have 1000's of unnecessry trace files.  
    A trace file is created for every user - SYS, SYSTEM, application users, etc... It's being created immediately - even if no SQL statements are run in the session.
    I've compared the init.ora parameters running in each database - and can find no differences. btw - SQL_TRACE is set to FALSE.
    Any ideas why a trace file is being generated for every session on Database A? And how to switch this off?
    TIA
    Regards
    Paul

    What type of content is in generated trace files? Is it SQL trace or something different?
    Have you any AFTER LOGON trigger? It can be checked with:
    col text format a100
    select name, text
      from dba_source
    where name in (select trigger_name from dba_triggers where triggering_event like 'LOGON%')
    order by name, line

  • Trace enabled, but no trace file generated

    I have enabled trace (Application Developer -> Concurrent -> Program, find the report, tick 'Enabled Trace', save), then i execute the report, but no trace file is generated, check the fnd_concurrent_requests table, the record has oracle_process_id=null.
    what can I do to have trace generated?

    Hi,
    I have enabled trace (Application Developer -> Concurrent -> Program, find the report, tick 'Enabled Trace', save), then i execute the report, but no trace file is generated, check the fnd_concurrent_requests table, the record has oracle_process_id=null.
    what can I do to have trace generated?Please enable trace from Apps 11i form -> Help -> Diagnostic -> Trace ( Here u can select the option like Regular trace, trace with bin etc) as per your requirement. But for this trace profile option should be enabled for your user.
    Regards,
    X A H E E R

  • Trace files generated by Portal

    Our DBA has just sent me an email saying that Portal is generating "thousands of trace files" on the server with messages like this:
    *** SESSION ID:(8.11147) 2002-08-05 15:46:12.338
    Traverse response tree:
    SOAP-ENV:Envelope:
    SOAP-ENV:Body:
    portal:initSessionResponse:
    sessionTimeout:
    1800
    I've never had/seen this problem before. Anyone know how to prevent this?
    Thanks
    Rich Zapata

    No version number and not enough information in what you posted to help you.
    Did this just start?
    If so what actions preceded it?
    Or is this a new install?
    Have you tried bouncing the instance?
    If it were my system I would have already searched the knowledgebase at metalink and opened an SR if I couldn't find a solution. Did you?

  • Trace files generated

    Oracle generated following trace files,
    can someone explain me, what error
    do they report?
    ora_28324.trc
    *** 2004-07-30 12:12:26.065
    *** SESSION ID:(19.7) 2004-07-30 12:12:26.064
    Probe:write_request: backend error 1003
    ora_28326.trc
    *** 2004-07-30 12:12:26.063
    *** SESSION ID:(20.2) 2004-07-30 12:12:26.054
    Probe:S:get_scalar: exception 10: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error
    *** 2004-07-30 12:23:42.230
    Probe:read_pipe: receive failed, status 3
    Probe:S:debug_loop: timeout. Action 1

    These are coming from the PL/SQL debugging API. They are non-fatal and can be ignored. Something/someone must be debugging some PL/SQL on the machine.

  • SAP instance Slow and trace file generates below errors :  DiagOConvert...

    Hello,
    please help to resolve the problem bellow :
    SAP informations :
    - SAP ECC 6.0
    - ORACLE : 10.2.0.4.0
    - Kernel release : 700
    Trace file content :
    *** ERROR => platform      : WINDOWS/NT [diagsrv.c    842]
      *** ERROR => gui version   : 710        [diagsrv.c    851]
      *** ERROR => gui patchlevel: 12                                                 [diagsrv.c
      *** ERROR => transaction   : SP01                 [diagsrv.c    867]
      *** ERROR => user          : SAPSERVE     [diagsrv.c    881]
      *** ERROR => display    : FRBOUD083 [diagsrv.c    887]
      *** ERROR => DiagOConvert: input and output buffer overlap [diagconv.c   1146]
    +0)  0x400000000149b6a8   CTrcStack2 + 0x1d8  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +1)  0x400000000149b4c0   CTrcStack + 0x18  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +2)  0x40000000015d5080   DiagOConvert + 0x1e0  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +3)  0x40000000015d7050   DiagoString0 + 0xf0  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +4)  0x400000000161e740   DiagoCurrentCodepage + 0x2c0  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +5)  0x4000000001601490   diagoutput + 0xb50  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +6)  0x40000000016003fc   diagmout + 0x1cc  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +7)  0x4000000001620f20   diagmsgo + 0x638  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +8)  0x4000000001508728   dytrcexit + 0x648  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +9)  0x4000000001507a30   dypex00 + 0x858  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +10)  0x4000000001513498   dynpoutf + 0x450  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +11)  0x400000000150a464   dynprctl + 0x61c  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +12)  0x4000000001504554   dynpen00 + 0x1f04  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +13)  0x400000000128e9c8   Thdynpen00 + 0xf08  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +14)  0x400000000128d1a8   TskhLoop + 0x5980  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +15)  0x4000000001281e44   ThStart + 0x214  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +16)  0x40000000011c8648   DpMain + 0x410  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +17)  0x40000000011c5c0c   nlsui_main + 0x14  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +18)  0x40000000011c5bd4   main + 0x3c  [dw.sapP05_DVEBMGS21]+
    +19)  0xc00000000000b7a8   $START$ + 0xa0  [/usr/lib/pa20_64/dld.sl]+
    Thank you.

    first of all, Than you for your answer,
    Yes i'v already seen thta note, but what they propose exactelly as aplicative solution by this text :
    Solution
    By applying a kernel patch, the trace output is enhanced with the information of the callpoint so that the cause of the problem can be analyzed faster.
    The error traces were issued with the print view of texts. The problem is solved with a kernel patch.
    The error trace output now works at trace levels higher than 1 only.

  • Separated trace file which I can read with the log viewer

    Hi All,
    I 'd like to write trace infomation.
    I know I can use the default trace.
    But I 'm looking for a way to write my application information in a separated file,
    which I can read with the log viewer.
    Can someone help me with this
    Thnaks
    Steve

    Hi epexpert,
    thaks for your reply.
    I tried it with the Filelog.
    The Problem is that it logs to the file (its not problematically) but also to the defaulttrace
    and thats not my preferred solution.
    Do you have any other ideas?
    Bye Steve

  • How can I delete all components of Firefox 8 for Mac. Again...all components and hidden files. (YES, I did check the Moz web site but the page was essentially blank

    I have an unstable install of Mozilla firefox 8 and need to delete ALL files from my mac running OSX 10.7.2. I went to Mozilla web site and got this but it does not populate with content:
    http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Uninstalling%20Firefox?s=uninstall+firefox+mac&r=0&as=s#w_removing-user-data-and-settings
    But nothing appears at this URL.

    Please note I need all files removed including the hidden ones.
    thx

  • How to force the File Path Control Browser button to the RT Target instead of the host machine?

    I am building an application on a RT PXI system, and for one of the functions I would like the user to be able to use the browser button of the File Path Control to choose a directory on the PXI. However the browser button seems to only want open a file on the host PC, even though the application is fully deployed on the target. Note that I am controlling the PXI from a host PC.
    If anyone has any suggestions that would be great. Thanks.

    Hi,
    Unfortunately, there is not a VI to do this. Are you browsing to these files from your host VI? In order to access the files on your PXI RT target, you'll need to FTP in and browse to them that way. You could programmatically do this, but there is not a simple VI to do so.
    Amanda Howard
    Americas Services and Support Recruiting Manager
    National Instruments

  • Unable to generate SQL trace file on a 10.2.0.1.0 database

    Hello,
    I am unable to generate SQL trace files on a 10.2.0.1.0 database (OS is Win2003 server 64 bits).
    First I tried the way I used to do it on older databases (8i and 9i) :
    execute dbms_system.set_sql_trace_in_session(sid, serial#, true);
    I got no error, but no file was created in the user dump dest directory.
    Then I've been searching and I've tried other things :
    - I changed the user_dump_dest parameter
    - I changed the tracefiles_public parameter value to "true", by modifying the init.ora file
    - I tried another package :
    exec dbms_monitor.session_trace_enable(139)
    Nothing worked, I can't create any trace file...
    Does anyone have an idea about this issue ?
    thank you for you help !
    Antoine

    Hello,
    thank you all for replying.
    I have 2 instances on this machine, and I've just realized that with the other one I have no problem to generate sql trace files as usual.
    But why the hell is it impossible on the first instance ? What difference between the 2 instances can explain this ?
    This is pretty weird...
    Otherwise I am experiencing serious performance problems on the instance where I can't creat trace files, there must be something wrong with it, but I can't figure it out
    regards,
    Antoine

  • EDI  X12 scenario,deq.bat file not generating any trace file.

    hello,
    i have worked on the EDI X12 over internet(AS2) Transaction,everything is working fine until the creation and deployment of configurations on both Acme and GlobalChips servers.But During the Verification of Purchase Order Transactions when i am running deq.bat file on both Acme and GlobalChips servers the dq script is not generating any t1.trc trace file.
    There is no problem with the Trading Partners on both servers they are on upstate,can anyone help me with this issue please,its very urgent.
    note: where will be the web.xml file for transportServlet located,can anyone provide me with the file path.
    thnx
    sunny

    Hello Sinkar,
    Thanks for your reply,Finally i have managed resolve the issue(deq.bat file is generating t1.trc file) successfully.But there are certain other issues regarding this topic in which i need your help.
    When i am running the deq.bat file in command prompt on both acme and globalchips servers it is showing the following status
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;deq.bat
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;java oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.IPDeq
    ueue ipdequeue.properties
    IPDequeue start...
    Dequeue from IP_IN_QUEUE
    and it also generated a t1.trc file on both servers,but the prompt in which i have run deq.bat is not giving any further message
    i.e some thing like IPDequeue end.
    and not even coming back to the original path i.e
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;
    and even if close the prompt it is not showing anything in t1.trc file and if i am running the enq_850.bat in acme server it is showing following stat
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;enq_850.bat
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;java oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.IPEnq
    ueue enq_850.properties
    IPEnqueue start...
    IPEnqueue end.
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;
    and its didn't showing anything in the t1.trc file generated on the globalchips server and same thing is happening when i am running enq_855.bat file on the globalchips server its not showing up anything in the trace file generated on the acme server.
    I have tried one thing that u have suggested for such kind of issue(t1.trc empty) in your forums
    1.) I have applied the patch #6673231 and it is showing the Document Routing Id Field in the B2B UI,but when i am completing all the process in B2B UI and running deq.bat file the result is still the same,the IPDequeue is not ending
    But a certain change has taken place after applying the pat
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;java oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.IPEnq+
    ueue enq_850.properties+
    IPEnqueue start...+
    Action Name = null
    IPEnqueue end.+
    D:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;+
    C:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;enq_855.bat+
    C:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;java oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.data.IPEnq+
    ueue enq_855.properties+
    IPEnqueue start...+
    Action Name = null
    IPEnqueue end.+
    C:\oracle\OraJ2EE\ip\tutorial\X12\runtime&gt;+
    I Think that no action is taking place in both the cases
    bcoz its showing this Action Name = null+
    if that is the case what is the problem here
    I have also set oracle.tip.adapter.b2b.DocumentRouting=true.
    but the situation is still the same,please read the above problem carefully and suggest a solution which would be fruitful for my further progress.
    thanks
    sunny
    Edited by: user10470973 on Dec 16, 2008 10:43 AM
    Edited by: user10470973 on Dec 16, 2008 10:44 AM

Maybe you are looking for