Lotus Notes. Which one for Mavericks?

Hello,
I have upgraded to Mavericks.
I used Lotus Notes, for work email, replicating my company database.
Since the upgrade Notes 7.02 started crashing everytime I was trying to download new emails or to replicate the database.
New attemps to install different versions failed (8.5 or 9.0 social).
Is there any version of Lotus Notes that is compatible with Mavericks?
Thanks a lot.

Did you remember to rename or move Notes.app? It conflicts with Apple's Notes.app. I used to use Lotus for work but they also provided standard IMAP and LDAP interfaces that worked great with standard Apple Mail, Calendar, and Contacts apps. Notes uses Java so you will have to have the latest and greatest Java available.
We have Gmail now so I can't help much more. If it is any consolation, Lotus worked better Gmail.

Similar Messages

Is Fluid Mask 3 the best Knockout Plug-ins if not which one is?

Is Fluid Mask 3 the best Knockout Plug-ins for Photoshop, if not which one is? I will appreciate it if someone can recommend a good and sophisticated Photoshop Knockout Plug-ins. Thank you

Kim,
In answer to your original question, Fluid Mask 3
is probably the most fully featured of the current masking tools, and apparently the most expensive. Thanks to your message, I took a closer look at Fluid Mask 3 and, as a result, I have added it to my "wish list" for when I get enough free budget for the purchase. But thanks for keeping me from "blowing my money" on a lesser tool.
I had originally decided against Fluid Mask based on the fact that much of its masking is based on the concept of "inside colors" and "outside colors" and, indeed, Fluid Mask has some very powerful tools for implementing that concept. But in
many cases that concept breaks down because many colors appear both inside and outside a "foreground" object.
Some insects and other creatures in nature rely on protective coloration (camouflage) and, for example, such a bug sitting on tree bark will have most of the tree bark repeated in its color pattern.
But even human subject subjects can have surrounding colors repeated on them, either by happenstance or by the phenomenon of radiosity, in which each illuminated object becomes a secondary light source.
In the real world, the circumstance in which the foreground object has a unique set of colors different from the background is very rare. That is why I used Corel KnockOut 1.5 so much. In it, you draw an inside line and an outside line and they define very local sets of inside and outside colors which can be interpolated for a transition mask. Those color sets can change continuously along the boundary, allowing for repeated color reversals. The motto of the original Ultimatte KnockOut (before Corel purchased it) was, "There are no edges, there are only transitions." KnockOut produced some very good knockouts for me for that reason. However, the tedium of drawing inside lines and outside lines, and refining them, slowed the process of getting a good mask.
Fluid Mask's automatically produced adjustable vector sub-boundaries are a very interesting, unique, and useful feature that can help deal with objects that have areas of color that match the color of background areas, by letting you choose which areas are inside and which areas are outside. Those automatically drawn vector patches are what changed my mind about Fluid Mask. I think I could get a good mask faster with Fluid Mask 3 than I could with KnockOut 1.5, and that is the reason why I think Fluid Mask 3 might be worth its rather high price.
But, like I said before, it will be awhile before I have the budget to make that purchase. There are several software tools that have higher priority, like an upgrade to Photoshop CS3 Extended, for example.
-- Burton --

Can I use The iPhone (5s) or iPad (air 2 or mini 3) like a webcam? If not, which one a compatible camera? please, a good one but no expensive?

Can I use The iPhone (5s) or iPad (air 2 or mini 3) like a webcam? If not, which one a compatible camera? please, a good one but no expensive...

You can get apps for a Mac (and the iPs device) that allows you to use the iOS device as a webcam.
For a dedicated webcam:
http://www.mac-compatible-web-cam.com/

I just purchased a Canon 7D Mark II, new DellXPS and the Lightroom 5.2. The Lighthouse is not openinging the 7DMark II but does open the older 7D that I imported. I checked the Abode update page and do not see one for the 7D Mark II. Please say it is t

I just purchased a Canon 7D Mark II, new DellXPS and the Lightroom 5.2. The Lighthouse is not openinging the 7DMark II but does open the older 7D that I imported. I checked the Abode update page and do not see one for the 7D Mark II. Please say it is there - if not when. I am "on hold till its done. Thanks.

Update to the current release, which is Lightroom 5.7.1. You can do this from the Lightroom help menu and choosing updates.

Do I install all four programs...and if not, which ones do I pick?

I just bought photoshop elements and premier elements but when I registered them I got serial numbers for four programs: Photoshop elements 13.0 and Photoshop elements 13.0 Win and Premier Elements 13.0 MLP and Premier Elements 13.0 WIN. Am I to download all of them? If not which ones? What's the difference? Will it cause problems if I download all of them?

They are not 4 products. They are simply the Mac and Windows versions of each respective program.
Mylenium

I am debating between the 13in 2.9ghz mac book pro or the 13in 2.5 ghz mac book pro with all the same specs bbut for me i am trying to see which one for the money is better becuase the 2.5 will run me 100-200 dollars less than the other

I am debating between the 13in 2.9ghz mac book pro or the 13in 2.5 ghz mac book pro with all the same specs bbut for me i am trying to see which one for the money is better becuase the 2.5 will run me 100-200 dollars less than the other

Only you can make that determination. All things being equal the 2.5 GHz model is slower.

Lotus notes calendar one-way sync - reminder/alarm problem

Hello Everyone,
I haven't found a proper answer to this so posting here. Hopefully I will get a quick answer from some of the experts here.
BB Desktop Manager version: 5.0.1.37
Device: Curve 8900 4.6.1
Lotus notes version: 8.0.2
I use BIS with tmobile and have my gmail emails delivered to my device.
I am doing a lotus notes one-way calendar sync with my BB calendar. I am able to do this successfully. But the alarm & free/busy thing does not sync.
Even though I have alarm set in my notes which works perfectly and I see the notification 15 mins before the meeting on my PC. They don't show up in BB calendar. In BB Desktop Manager-> map fields, the notes 'notify me' is mapped to 'device alarm flag' but when I open the details of an entry that BDM is going to make in the accept/reject screen these fields are empty. I am using the default field mapping in the desktop manager.
All reminder works for the entries that I create directly in BB. The device calendar reminder is set properly. No issues there.
What should I change in the desktop manager so that I get a reminder in my BB for the lotus notes entry?

Hello ggap10,
You can try to enabled an advanced logging of the Calendar to see where the alarm flag is not populating.
KB01451 will guide you through the process to enable the logging.
If you need further technical assistance, you can call your service provider.
Thanks and have a great day!
-HMthePirate
Come follow your BlackBerry Technical Team on twitter! @BlackBerryHelp
Be sure to click Kudos! for those who have helped you.Click Solution? for posts that have solved your issue(s)!

Switching to Mac - which one for me?

I can't find a suitable place for this question, but my son is starting a job at a tv studio and wants a mac to get into video creation and editing. Which one should he get for this purpose? He has a pc, so he has keyboard, video and mouse. Thanks.
pc right now Windows XP

Hello and Welcome to Apple Discussions.
He should go for the Mac Pro. As a professional he'll appreciate the expandability in the coming months and years. iMacs are fantastic general purpose machines and ideal for home video editing but if you're doing it day-in, day-out the Mac Pro is the way to go. They don't cost a great deal more either:
iMac
24" LCD
1x2.1.6GHz Merom
1Gb RAM (3GB)
250Gb HDD (750Gb)
8x DVD±RW DL
BT and Airport
$1,999.00
Mac Pro
23" LCD (with then option to connect up to a 30" too)
2x2.0GHz Xeon Woodcrest
1Gb RAM (16Gb)
250Gb HDD (3Tb)
16x DVD±RW DL (x2 or Bluray in future)
BT and Airport
$3,278.00
It's fair to say that's over a thousand dollars more but when you look at the specs and the room the Mac Pro allows for the future it's a much better bet.
mrtotes

Quadro k4000 vs GTX 760. which one for AE

I have 2 Computers and planning to mix them up together as possible. I built a PC with quadro k4000 last year because I was graduated as 3D animator and i plan to work as Animator, plus I also have another PC with GTX 760. and now I'm currently working as Video Editor. so here are my questions:
- k4000 and gtx 760 which one would do better in AE and Pr ?
- I read some articles said: "quadro and gtx can group up together in one PC". is it really possible ? because some people said yes and some people said no and some people said yes but wont work together blah blah. I really want to know about it, because right now I already have these 2 GPU. and if YES. can you show me how to do it?
there are my both PC specs:
CPU: core i7 3820 3.66hz
RAM: 16GB
SSD 128gb
HDD 3TB
MotherBoard: Asus P9X79 PRO
VGA: asus GTX 760
Another one is:
CPU core i7-3930K 3.20GHz
RAM: 32GB
SSD: 256gb
HDD: 3TB x 2
MotherBoard: ASRock X79 Extreme6
VGA: quadro k4000
Can somebody help me to build these 2 PC in just 1 PC as possible ?

I have something similar that I just posted about - my system has both a GTX780 and a Quadro K4200 installed. Eric is right. They work, but the driver installation can be tricky.
Mine is a new build and I am trying to learn how the two cards work together. I expected better performance. I don't understand why setting CUDA acceleration to only the GeForce, when NVidia allows for both CUDA GPUs. I tried every combination with no difference in results. So, I will be following your thread to see what happens.

Imac Core 2 vs Core i5 - which one for everyday use?

Planning to replace my current iMac with a new 27" model in the very near future. I can't decide whether to go for the 'basic' core 2 model or stump up the extra for a core i5 model (an extra £250 here in the UK).
Don't know whether anyone has experience of using both but would welcome any feedback on the relative performance in day-to-day use. I'm not into games or heavily processor intensive tasks (eg video encoding); I'll mostly just be web browsing, using iLife (iPhoto mainly), MS Office etc.
Will I notice any real performance difference? Is the extra worth it?
I intend to keep it for at least 3 years so an element of future proofing would be nice (although my current 2006 2.16 Core 2 iMac is still going strong).

I've owned both systems and trust me, the i5 is noticeably faster even on day to day stuff. You also get the better video card. Seriously, it's a no brainer, get the i5. The C2D is certainly no slouch but it doesn't compare and it's much older technology. The i5 turbo's up automatically to 3.2ghz if only one or two of the cores are in use and the memory controller is integrated into the cpu instead of the motherboard which eliminates that bottleneck as well. Macworld summed it up perfectly:
*Macworld’s buying advice*
With the new 2.66GHz Core i5 iMac and the 2.8GHz Core i7 iMac, Apple has not only blurred the line between consumer and professional systems, it's darn near erased it. The 2.66GHz Core i5 iMac offers faster performance at most tasks than the 2.66GHz Quad-Core Mac Pro. The Core i5 iMac also has more memory and more storage space than the 2.66GHz Quad-Core Mac Pro, while being $500 less (plus you get a 27-inch screen with the iMac). Unless you absolutely require additional PCI cards, multiple internal hard drives, or a lot of RAM, the Core i5 iMac makes a strong case for being the go-to system for most Mac professionals.
Cheers!
James

Arch64 or Arch 32bit? Which ones for me?

First of all, glad to finally be a part of the best linux forum of the best linux distribution. I have been using ArchLinux 32 bit on my desktop at home ever since I first tried it 6 months ago. I must say after using various other distributions it has to be the best one out there ( in my opinion ).
So now to my problem: I just got myself a Lenovo Thinkpad T61p, with 4GB of ram, 200GB HD, a 2.4 Core 2 Duo processor. Ofcourse Arch is going to be my main operating system on it, but I can't decide whether I want to run Arch64 or 32 bit.
Besides having Arch or Arch64 as the native os, I plan on installing the Vista that came with my laptop for "Free" (insert hidden M$ tax here) as a Virtualbox guest. I do use Adobe CS3 and Visual Studio 2005 once in a blue moon so I figure might as well have it on there. I've seen videos of the Compiz-Fusion 3D desktop, and would like to incorporate Vbox with compiz eventually and have a seamless virtualization of Vista. Also, I mostly use this laptop for web/software development. So all that being said.
Are the Arch64 repos as or almost as up to date compared to the Arch 32 bit?
Is it worth even messing with Arch64? I really dont mind tinkering, so can I do everything in Arch64 that I can do in Arch32 (sometimes with a bit of tinkering)?
Also, is the performance gain (for those of you that have used both 64 and i686) worth the hassle? Or should I just stick with 32bit for now? I found various posts that say it is possible to modify the kernel so that all 4GB are recognized on the 32bit. I plant on giving 2GB of the ram to the guest os on virtualbox. Please give me some advice I am torn between my two options.

I've been thinking about this lately, too. I went with Arch64 when I migrated to Arch last week, and while I got everything I need to work now (Wine, 32-bit browser for native Java/Javaws, Skype), I wonder a little if it was the right choice. It took quite a bit of work, though I'm still very much a Linux newbie, so I had to read up extra stuff, but I also learned new things by doing so.
I look at this heap of lib32 packages I got from AUR and wonder how I will keep these properly up-to-date without having to check them manually on a weekly basis. Also the aforementioned packages need manual maintenance and they depend on the effort of the admirable people who maintain them. Some packages take longer to arrive for 64-bit (KTorrent is a current example) and generally the 32-bit support seems better.
My box has 3 GB, which is 1.5 GB more than I actually seem to need, and I probably won't ever upgrade the machine to have more than 4 GB where I would really benefit from 64-bit. I mostly use the computer for typical desktop stuff, including watching movies, playing music, getting text processing work done, mail, web, etc -- just the every day stuff, but nothing that's number-crunching-intensive. I rarely encode video and such where 64-bit would give me an edge.
So, I wonder if I made the right choice. Running Arch64 seems to require more effort and add some tiny bits of inconvenience, without any advantages. Well, actually, the last bit is speculation and based on hearsay. I only had the 64-bit box for a month now, and I never ran a 32-bit Linux on it, so I don't know if it is faster or if there would be no difference. Some people say that a 64-bit OS seems faster to them, but at least as many, if not more, people say that there is no difference at all.
Now that I have everything working, it's moot point, but when KDE4 is released and has matured a bit, I might just back up relevant data and do a reinstall. At that point I would have to decide between 32 and 64 bit again, and somehow 32-bit seems more convenient, unless I learn of advantages of 64-bit for what I do and what I have (less than 4 GB RAM). A lot of the info I found on the topic of performance increase is contradicting.
On the flipside it would just feel so wrong to run a 32-bit OS on a 64-bit machine. Kind of like drinking champagne out of a water glass.

F-54 - f-44 which one for adv pmnt clearing

which t.code is used for adv pmnt clearing f-54 or f-44

it depends on the payment method and in what way u r making a payment.... i think in normal case we do not require f-44because we are paying the full invoice amount and vendor is cleared ... but when there are cases in which payment is made as a partial payment or something like when ur payment is made but vendor is not cleared...
say for example
my invoice amount is 1000 and i m making a partial payment of 700 so in FBL1N it shows both 1000 and 700 as open item in this case u need to use f-44 to clear the vendor
hope u clear abt it
reward points
sejal singh

2 versions of Numbers 2.02 and Numbers 09. Which one for Lion?

How do I delete the wrong one?

Version 2.1 is the late one but, as far as I know, version 2.0.5 behave flawlessly under Lion.
It's a good choice for those which dislike AutoSave & Versions.
Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) samedi 28 janvier 2012
iMac 21”5, i7, 2.8 GHz, 12 Gbytes, 1 Tbytes, mac OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.2
My Box account is : http://www.box.com/s/00qnssoyeq2xvc22ra4k

SDRAM ??? 333,444?,533 MHz. Which ones for me! soundseasybutimadumbdumb

I have 512 like i said. well i need a gig real bad. so the question is:
About My Mac:
512 MB DDR2 SDRAM, Speed: PC2-4200S-444
and in the specifications section: (<what i should have>)
512MB PC2-4200 DDR2 SDRAM (running at 333MHz)
is what should be in my computer, trusting it is. sooooo my question is that the 444 my computer says i have; spost to be 333? and in buying more should i only buy the 444 ( which i cant find as of now ). I can only find the 4200 ddr2; in 333MHz and 533MHz ? ? ?
Apple PowerBook G4 1.67GHz 15 (the 333MHz one), and 15.2 ( the 533Mhz)
Link to the 2nd one:
http://www.memorystore.com/upgrades_system.asp?cboSystem=24296
am I 444-333-533...... am I 15 or 15.2........
hope yall can help me and this might help some others,
thanks a really much alot! fore realzz!
PowBoo G4 (15 in. Double-Layer SD) 1.67 GHz, 100gb HD, 512 DDR2 SDRAM Mac OS X (10.4.8) 250gb External G-Tech Harddrive. (but buy a Glyph! trust me)

Greetings Rodney:
Thank you for your time and information.
Your saying 133MZ ram will work on 100MZ and 133MZ machines and but 100MZ ram will only work on 100MZ machines?
Is the 133MZ noticebly faster than the 100MZ machines? The Power Macintosh G4 "Digital Audio", tends to be a lower priced (used) machine, than the QuickSilver.
I forgot about the processor. Thanks for pointing that out. I contacted OWC and they gave me these compatible models for this particular processor:
• Power Macintosh G4 "Sawtooth" 100MHz Bus, Available in G4/350MHz, G4/400MHz, G4/450MHz or G4/500MHz speeds
• Power Macintosh G4 "Gigabit Ethernet" 100MHz Bus, Available in G4/400MHz, Dual G4/450MHz* or Dual G4/500MHz* speeds
• Power Macintosh G4 "Digital Audio" 133MHz Bus, Available in G4/466MHz, G4/533MHz, G4/733MHz, or Dual G4/533MHz* speeds
• Power Macintosh G4 "QuickSilver" 133MHz Bus, Available in G4/733MHz, G4/867MHz, or Dual G4/800MHz* speeds
• Power Macintosh G4 "QuickSilver 2002" 133MHz Bus, Available in G4/733MHz(Education only), G4/800MHz, G4/933MHz, or Dual G4/1.0GHz* speeds
G4 (AGP) 1.4 GHZ (OWC) Mac OS X (10.4.8) 1.5 GB RAM, (2) 250 GB & (1) 120 GB HDs, 8500 Radeon, Acard ATA-133, HP 2410v

F.F. keeps telling me i need an ActiveX Plug-in but i can not find one for 3.5.11. This is the first time i have ever had a problem and totally lost here...please help. Jared

I was going to add some new ringtones to my cell and in trying to listen to the samples i keep getting the Firefox needs to an ActiveX Plug-in would i like to be directed to where it is but nothing there matches....
== This happened ==
Just once or twice
== Every time i have tried to go to site to review ring tones...

Firefox, and most other browsers except IE, does not use ActiveX. See [[ActiveX]]
You can try this add-on to see if it will allow you to listen to the ring tones by using IE's rendering engine in a Firefox tab:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/92382/
Note that the support for your version of Firefox is scheduled to end in August 2010 (see info at top of this page: https://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html . You may want to consider upgrading to the more current version: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Also see:
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Upgrading+to+Firefox+3.6#What_s_new_in_Firefox_3_6_
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Updating+Firefox
http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Installing+Firefox
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Custom+installation+of+Firefox+on+Windows
'''''Other Issues''''': ~~red:You have installed plug-ins with known security issues. You should update them immediately.~~
'''Update Java''': your ver. 1.6.0.19; current ver. 1.6.0.20 (important security update 04-15-2010)
(Firefox 3.6 and above requires Java 1.6.0.10 or higher; see: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Java-related+issues#Java_does_not_work_in_Firefox_3_6 )
''(Windows users: Do the manual update; very easy.)''
~~red:Check your version here~~: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/
See: '''[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Java+plugin+with+Firefox#Updates Updating Java]'''
Do the update with Firefox closed.
'''NOTE:''' Java version 1.6.0.21 has been released. It is mainly an update for developers of Java applications and most users do not need to be concerned about downloading version 1.6.0.21. '''''At this time''''', the update option in existing installations of Java 1.6.0.20 are not updating to version 1.6.0.21; '''''at this time''''', it must be manually downloaded and installed. According to the Java release notes:
''"'''Bug Fixes'''''
''Java SE 6 Update 21 does not contain any additional fixes for security vulnerabilities to its previous release, Java SE 6 Update 20. Users who have Java SE 6 Update 20 have the latest security fixes and do not need to upgrade to this release to be current on security fixes."'' Source: http://java.sun.com/javase/6/webnotes/6u21.html
'''Install/Update Adobe Flash Player for Firefox (aka Shockwave Flash)''': your ver. 10.~~red:0 r32~~; current ver. 10.1 r53 ('''important security update 2010-06-10'''; see: http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-14.html)
~~red:Check your version here~~: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/
See: '''[http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Managing+the+Flash+plugin#Updating_Flash Updating Flash]'''
-'''use Firefox to download''' and '''SAVE to your hard drive''' (save to Desktop for easy access)
-exit Firefox (File > Exit)
-''In Windows,'' check to see that Firefox is completely closed (''Ctrl+Alt+Del, choose Task Manager, click Processes tab, if "firefox.exe" is on the list, right-click "firefox.exe" and choose End process, close the Task Manager window'')
-''In Windows,'' double-click on the Adobe Flash installer you just downloaded to install/update Adobe Flash
-when the Flash installation is complete, start Firefox, and test the Flash installation here: http://kb.adobe.com/selfservice/viewContent.do?externalId=tn_15507&sliceId=1
*'''NOTE: On Vista and Windows 7''' you may need to run the plugin installer as Administrator by starting the installer via the right-click context menu if you do not get an UAC prompt to ask for permission to continue (i.e nothing seems to happen). See this: http://vistasupport.mvps.org/run_as_administrator.htm
*'''NOTE for IE:''' Firefox and most other browsers use a Plugin. IE uses an ActiveX version of Flash. To install/update the IE ActiveX Adobe Flash Player, same instructions as above, except use IE to download the ActiveX Flash installer. See: [[ActiveX]]
*Also see: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Flash ~~red:'''''AND'''''~~ [[How do I edit options to add Adobe to the list of allowed sites]]
'''You '''~~red:'''MAY'''~~''' need to Update Adobe Reader for Firefox (aka Adobe PDF Plug-In For Firefox)''': your ver. N/A; current ver. 9.3.3 (important security update release 06-29-2010; see: http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-15.html)
~~red:Check your version here~~: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/
See: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Using+the+Adobe+Reader+plugin+with+Firefox#Installing_and_updating_Adobe_Reader
''You may be able to update from the Adobe Reader installed on your system'' instead of going to the Adobe site and downloading. Open the Adobe Reader installed on your system (''in Windows, Start > Program Files, find and click Adobe Reader to open''), click Help, click Check for Updates. Allow the download/update to occur. If you use this method, no need to proceed with the instructions below, '''but''' do look at the two bulleted items at the bottom "'''NOTE for IE:'''" and "Also see:". Restart Firefox and check your new version here: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/plugincheck/
''If you go to the Adobe site to download the current Adobe Reader:''
-'''use Firefox to download''' and '''SAVE to your hard drive''' (save to Desktop for easy access)
~~red:-See the images at the bottom left of this post to see the steps to take on the Adobe site~~
-exit Firefox (File > Exit)
-In Windows: check to see that Firefox is completely closed (''Ctrl+Alt+Del, choose Task Manager, click Processes tab, if "firefox.exe" is on the list, right-click "firefox.exe" and choose End process, close the Task Manager window'')
-In Windows: double-click on the Adobe Reader installer you just downloaded to install/update Adobe Reader
*'''NOTE: On Vista and Windows 7''' you may need to run the plugin installer as Administrator by starting the installer via the right-click context menu if you do not get an UAC prompt to ask for permission to continue (i.e nothing seems to happen). See this: http://vistasupport.mvps.org/run_as_administrator.htm
*'''NOTE for IE:''' Firefox and most other browsers use a Plugin. IE uses an ActiveX version. To install/update the IE ActiveX version, same instructions as above, except use IE to download the ActiveX installer. See: [[ActiveX]]
*Also see: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Adobe_Reader ~~red:'''''AND'''''~~ [[How do I edit options to add Adobe to the list of allowed sites]]

Lotus Notes. Which one for Mavericks?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for