LOV table column filter with bind variable

Greetings everyone,
I am using JDev version: 11.1.2.3.0
I have a table which has all it's columns with filterable property set to 'true'. I have already created a filter for the first one which displays the total list of users registered in the system. But the second one is a bit more complex.
I want to display a LOV which takes it's values from a VO with a bind variable. In a normal situation there is a another VO which links one of it's properties to this bind var in the View Accessor section of the LOV configuration dialog just like this:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_OSq71i5oy0c/SUa6qdnkkoI/AAAAAAAABnY/QnBPmGFgLI4/s400/3.PNG
But i want to be able to display this LOV in a column filter, the code i used is this:
<f:facet name="filter">
                         <af:selectOneChoice value="#{vs.filterCriteria.Debtor}"
                                label="Debtor" unselectedLabel=""
                                 id="soc104">
                                                                        <af:forEach items="#{bindings.ContractPartiesView1.rangeSet}"
                                                                                    var="debtors">
                                                                            <f:selectItem id="si104"
                                                                                          itemLabel="#{debtors.Name}"
                                                                                          itemValue="#{debtors.PartyNumber}"/>
                                                                        </af:forEach>
                                                                    </af:selectOneChoice>
                                                                </f:facet>
Where Name is the name of the items to display, and PartyNumber is the value by which the table property (column) Debtor is connected to ContractPartiesView1 (the DC of the first VO).
It doesn't display nothing, and i suppose this is due the fact that ContractPartiesView1 has that bind variable which stays uninitialized.
I need to find a way to initialize this bind variable to get the filtered values for the LOV. I've tried to use a listOfValue binding insted of a tree, but with no result. Am i missing something?
Thanks in advance

I had resolved this, the very next day, but i didn't have chance to reply.
I've simply created another VO, which didn't have a bind variable to get that ID, it was simply linked with a master detail relationship with the one it should get the ID from (via FK). I've created this other VO because the first one was already in use for some other requirement.

Similar Messages

  • LOV from filtered VO (with bind variable)

    Greetings experts,
    I would really appreciate any help about this topic. I am using JDev version: 11.1.2.3.0.
    Ok, the problem is this: i have a VO, based on an EO, which have a field (type: BigDecimal). I wanted to represent this field using a LOV, which takes it's value from another VO which is query based.
    Now, if i use this field as a simple input text field everything works fine (of course). But this is not suitable from the user point of view so i wanted to use this LOV, but doing this it keeps saying the same error message while i press the createInsert button: "You must make at least one selection".
    I've come across this link during my research: ADF BUGS FACTS &amp;amp; Workarounds: Invalid values in choice lists
    So i switched in using the other type of lists mentioned in the link, but none of them works. In fact when i press the createInsert button, not just that one field, but every other field in that form (the fields from the first VO) dissapear, as they get disabled (weird). Am i missing something? If there is in fact a bug on filtered choice lists, why the other types doesn't work?
    I am not typing any code here cause i really don't understand what is the problem, so if you require it, just tell me and i'll comment back
    Thank you for your time.

    Hi,
    to initializing the bind variables used for an LOV query check this: Decompiling ADF Binaries: Initializing the bind variables used for an LOV query
    Habib

  • LOV(af:selectOneChoice) with bind variable in af:table

    Hi All,
    I have a table where a column is defined as dropdown(af:selectOneChoice). The query for selectOneChoice has a bind variable which needs to be set as a value from the base view Object corresponding row.
    Suppose a table Employee
    EmpId EmpName EmpType Authorization
    101 John Temp No
    The above table is created as af:table and 'Authorization' is implemented as dropdown(af:selectOneChoice) . The selectOneChoice has a query(AuthorizationLovVVO) with bind variable . For each row of af:table(EmployeeVO) , af:selectOneChoice query(AuthorizationLovVVO) requires
    the corresponding row(EmployeeVO) 'EmpType' to be set as value of bind variable.
    Can you please suggest how can we achieve this functionality.
    Edited by: 907302 on Oct 17, 2012 7:22 AM
    Edited by: 907302 on Oct 17, 2012 7:22 AM

    I have checked the following post where it has been suggested to access the the current row value as groovy expression.
    groovy for bind variable
    Suppose my AM name is 'TestAM' , i have tried the below expressions for value of bind variable but it does not work :
    1) adf.object.TestAM.findViewObject('EmployeeVO1').currentRow.EmpType
    2) adf.object.TestAMDataControl.findViewObject('EmployeeVO1').currentRow.EmpType
    None of the above expressions work and i get the error while running the page as 'Variable NotesAM is not recognized.' / 'Variable NotesAMDataControl is not recognized.' .
    Can you please suggest if we can achieve the functionality using this approach . Also let me know if i am missing something in the above expression.

  • SLOW report performance with bind variable

    Environment: 11.1.0.7.2, Apex 4.01.
    I've got a simplified report page where the report runs slowly compared to running the same query in sqldeveloper. The report region is based on a pl/sql function returning a query. If I use a bind variable in the query inside apex it takes 13 seconds to run, and if I hard code a string it takes only a few hundredths of a second. The query returns one row from a table which has 1.6 million rows. Statistics are up-to-date and the columns in the joins and where clause are indexed.
    I've run traces using p_trace=YES from Apex for both the bind variable and hard coded strings. They are below.
    The sqldeveloper explain plan is identical to the bind variable plan from the trace, yet the query runs in 0.0x seconds in sqldeveloper.
    What is it about bind variable syntax in Apex that is causing the bad execution plan? Apex Bug? 11g bug? Ideas?
    tkprof output from Apex trace with bind variable is below...
    select p.master_id link, p.first_name||' '||p.middle_name||' '||p.last_name||' '||p.suffix personname,
    p.gender||' '||p.date_of_birth g_dob, p.master_id||'*****'||substr(p.ssn,-4) ssn, p.status status
    from persons p
    where
       p.person_id in (select ps.person_id from person_systems ps where ps.source_key  like  LTRIM(RTRIM(:P71_SEARCH_SOURCE1)))
    order by 1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.00       0.00          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.01          0          1         27           0
    Fetch        2     13.15      13.22      67694      72865          0           1
    total        4     13.15      13.23      67694      72866         27           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 0
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 62  (ODPS_PRIVACYVAULT)   (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  SORT ORDER BY (cr=72869 pr=67694 pw=0 time=0 us cost=29615 size=14255040 card=178188)
          1   FILTER  (cr=72869 pr=67694 pw=0 time=0 us)
          1    HASH JOIN RIGHT SEMI (cr=72865 pr=67694 pw=0 time=0 us cost=26308 size=14255040 card=178188)
          1     INDEX FAST FULL SCAN IDX$$_0A300001 (cr=18545 pr=13379 pw=0 time=0 us cost=4993 size=2937776 card=183611)(object id 68485)
    1696485     TABLE ACCESS FULL PERSONS (cr=54320 pr=54315 pw=0 time=21965 us cost=14958 size=108575040 card=1696485)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
          1   SORT (ORDER BY)
          1    FILTER
          1     HASH JOIN (RIGHT SEMI)
          1      INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (FAST FULL SCAN) OF
                     'IDX$$_0A300001' (INDEX)
    1696485      TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (FULL) OF 'PERSONS' (TABLE)
    Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
      Event waited on                             Times   Max. Wait  Total Waited
      ----------------------------------------   Waited  ----------  ------------
      db file scattered read                       1276        0.00          0.16
      db file sequential read                       812        0.00          0.02
      direct path read                             1552        0.00          0.61
    ********************************************************************************Here's the tkprof output with a hard coded string:
    select p.master_id link, p.first_name||' '||p.middle_name||' '||p.last_name||' '||p.suffix personname,
    p.gender||' '||p.date_of_birth g_dob, p.master_id||'*****'||substr(p.ssn,-4) ssn, p.status status
    from persons p
    where
       p.person_id in (select ps.person_id from person_systems ps where ps.source_key  like  LTRIM(RTRIM('0b')))
    order by 1
    call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
    Parse        1      0.02       0.04          0          0          0           0
    Execute      1      0.00       0.00          0          0         13           0
    Fetch        2      0.00       0.00          0          8          0           1
    total        4      0.02       0.04          0          8         13           1
    Misses in library cache during parse: 1
    Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
    Parsing user id: 62  (ODPS_PRIVACYVAULT)   (recursive depth: 1)
    Rows     Row Source Operation
          1  SORT ORDER BY (cr=10 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=9 size=80 card=1)
          1   FILTER  (cr=10 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          1    NESTED LOOPS  (cr=8 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)
          1     NESTED LOOPS  (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=8 size=80 card=1)
          1      SORT UNIQUE (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5 size=16 card=1)
          1       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID PERSON_SYSTEMS (cr=4 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=5 size=16 card=1)
          1        INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_PERSON_SYSTEMS_SOURCE_KEY (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=3 size=0 card=1)(object id 68561)
          1      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN PK_PERSONS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 68506)
          1     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID PERSONS (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us cost=2 size=64 card=1)
    Rows     Execution Plan
          0  SELECT STATEMENT   MODE: ALL_ROWS
          1   SORT (ORDER BY)
          1    FILTER
          1     NESTED LOOPS
          1      NESTED LOOPS
          1       SORT (UNIQUE)
          1        TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
                       'PERSON_SYSTEMS' (TABLE)
          1         INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF
                        'IDX_PERSON_SYSTEMS_SOURCE_KEY' (INDEX)
          1       INDEX   MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'PK_PERSONS'
                      (INDEX (UNIQUE))
          1      TABLE ACCESS   MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF
                     'PERSONS' (TABLE)

    Patrick, interesting insight. Thank you.
    The optimizer must be peeking at my bind variables with it's eyes closed. I'm the only one testing and I've never passed %anything as a bind value. :)
    Here's what I've learned since my last post:
    I don't think that sqldeveloper is actually using the explain plan it says it is. When I run explain plan in sqldeveloper (with a bind variable) it shows me the exact same plan as Apex with a bind variable. However, when I run autotrace in sqldeveloper, it takes a path that matches the hard coded values, and returns results in half a second. That autotrace run is consistent with actually running the query outside of autotrace. So, I think either sqldeveloper isn't really using bind variables, OR it is using them in some other way that Apex does not, or maybe optimizer peeking works in sqldeveloper?
    Using optimizer hints to tweak the plan helps. I've tried both /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ and /*+ index(ps pk_persons) */ and both drop the query to about a second. However, I'm loath to use hints because of the very dynamic nature of the query (and Tom Kyte doesn't like them either). The hints may end up hurting other variations on the query.
    I also tested the query by wrapping it in a select count(1) from ([long query]) and testing the performance in sqldeveloper and in Apex. The performance in that case is identical with both bind variables and hard coded variables for both Apex and SqlDeveloper. That to me was very interesting and I went so far as to set up two bind variable report regions on the same page. One region wrapped the long query with select count(1) from (...) and the other didn't. The wrapped query ran in 0.01 seconds, the unwrapped took 15ish seconds with no other optimizations. Very strange.
    To get performance up to acceptable levels I have changed my function returning query to:
    1) Set the equality operator to "=" for values without wildcards and "like" for user input with wildcards. This makes a HUGE difference IF no wildcard is used.
    2) Insert a /*+ FIRST_ROWS */ hint when users chose the column that requires the sub-query. This obviously changes the optimizer's plan and improves query speed from 15 seconds to 1.5 seconds even with wildcards.
    I will NOT be hard coding any user supplied values in the query string. As you can probably tell by the query, this is an application where sql injection would be very bad.
    Jeff, regarding your question about "like '%' || :P71_SEARCH_SOURCE1 || '%'". I've found that putting wildcards around values, particularly at the beginning will negate any indexing on the column in question and slows performance even more.
    I'm still left wondering if there isn't something in Apex that is breaking the optimizer "peeking" that Patrick describes. Perhaps something in the way it switches contexts from apex_public_user to the workspace schema?

  • SQL query with Bind variable with slower execution plan

    I have a 'normal' sql select-insert statement (not using bind variable) and it yields the following execution plan:-
    Execution Plan
    0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
    1 0 HASH JOIN (Cost=7 Card=1 Bytes=148)
    2 1 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=4 Card=1 Bytes=100)
    3 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=3 Card=1)
    4 1 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF 'TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE)
    (Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
    Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    18 db block gets
    15558 consistent gets
    47 physical reads
    9896 redo size
    423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    1095 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    1 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    55 rows processed
    I have the same query but instead running using bind variable (I test it with both oracle form and SQL*plus), it takes considerably longer with a different execution plan:-
    Execution Plan
    0 INSERT STATEMENT Optimizer=CHOOSE (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
    1 0 TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'TABLEA' (Cost=3 Card=1 Bytes=100)
    2 1 NESTED LOOPS (Cost=407 Card=1 Bytes=148)
    3 2 INDEX (FAST FULL SCAN) OF TABLEB_IDX_003' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=135 Bytes=6480)
    4 2 INDEX (RANGE SCAN) OF 'TABLEA_IDX_2' (NON-UNIQUE) (Cost=2 Card=1)
    Statistics
    0 recursive calls
    12 db block gets
    3003199 consistent gets
    54 physical reads
    9448 redo size
    423 bytes sent via SQL*Net to client
    1258 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
    3 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
    1 sorts (memory)
    0 sorts (disk)
    55 rows processed
    TABLEA has around 3million record while TABLEB has 300 records. Is there anyway I can improve the speed of the sql query with bind variable? I have DBA Access to the database
    Regards
    Ivan

    Many thanks for your reply.
    I have run the statistic already for the both tableA and tableB as well all the indexes associated with both table (using dbms_stats, I am on 9i db ) but not the indexed columns.
    for table I use:-
    begin
    dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', tabname=> 'TABLEA', partname=> NULL);
    end;
    for index I use:-
    begin
    dbms_stats.gather_index_stats(ownname=> 'IVAN', indname=> 'TABLEB_IDX_003', partname=> NULL);
    end;
    Is it possible to show me a sample of how to collect statisc for INDEX columns stats?
    regards
    Ivan

  • Report Performance with Bind Variable

    Getting some very odd behaviour with a report in APEX v 3.2.1.00.10
    I have a complex query that takes 5 seconds to return via TOAD, but takes from 5 to 10 minutes in an APEX report.
    I've narrowed it down to one particular bind. If I hard code the date in it returns in 6 seconds, but if I let the date be passed in from a parameter it takes 5+ minutes again.
    Relevant part of the query (an inline view) is:
    ,(select rglr_lect lect
    ,sum(tpm) mtr_tpm
    ,sum(enrols) mtr_enrols
    from ops_dash_meetings_report
    where meet_ev_date between to_date(:P35_END_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') - 363 and to_date(:P35_END_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY')
    group by rglr_lect) RPV
    I've tried replacing the "to_date(:P35_END_DATE,'DD/MM/YYYY') - 363" with another item which is populated with the date required (and verified by checking session state). If I replace the :P35_END_DATE with an actual date the performance is fine again.
    The weird thing is that a trace file shows me exactly the same Explain Plan as the TOAD Explain where it runs in 5 seconds.
    Another odd thing is that another page in my application has the same inline view and doesn't hit the performance problem.
    The trace file did show some control characters (circumflex M) after each line of this report's query where these weren't anywhere else on the trace queries. I wondered if there was some sort of corruption in the source?
    No problems due to pagination as the result set is only 31 records and all being displayed.
    Really stumped here. Any advice or pointers would be most welcome.
    Jon.

    Don't worry about the Time column, the cost and cardinality are more important to see whther the CBO is making different decisions for whatever reason.
    Remember that the explain plan shows the expected execution plan and a trace shows the actual execution plan. So what you want to do is compare the query with bind variables from an APEX page trace to a trace from TOAD (or sqlplus or whatever). You can do this outside APEX like this...
    ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS '10046 trace name context forever, level 1';Enter and run your SQL statement...;
    ALTER SESSION SET sql_trace=FALSE;This will create a a trace file in the directory returned by...
    SELECT value FROM v$parameter WHERE name = 'user_dump_dest' Which you can use tkprof to format.
    I am assuming that your not going over DB links or anything else slightly unusual?
    Cheers
    Ben

  • Detail view with bind variable. TreeTable not showing all detail result.

    I’m having trouble with treeTable using detail view with bind variables and where clause defined in VO definition.
    Both, master and detail view objects, base on the same entity and have the same condition in where clause. The view objects also have bind variables, which are set in prepareRowSetForQuery() method.
    Again, these are two different views, that get different result, based on value of one of the bind variable.
    When I show results in two different tables on jsf page, where master table has "RowSelection" set on "single", all results are displayed in detail table.
    But when I use treeTable, only the first result of the detail is shown.

    I tested it in applicationModule and it works, but i think that's the same as two tables on a jsf page.
    This is the order in which overridden methods are called in ADF BC or two tables on jsf page
    when clicking on row in master table.
    PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
    executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
       Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;  -> print of the object2[] parameter in executeQueryForCollection
         List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
         List 1: 400035313 -> viewLink parameter value
    getEstimatedRowCount_Detail
    count: 2
    getEstimatedRowCount_Detail
    count: 2 And when i click on "expand node" in tree table:
    getEstimatedRowCount_Root
    count: 2
    PrepareRowSetForQuery_Detail
    executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
       Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
         List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
         List 1: 400035321
    PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
    executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
       Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
         List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
         List 1: 400035313
    getEstimatedRowCount_Root
    count: 2
    getEstimatedRowCount_Root
    count: 2
    getEstimatedRowCount_Root
    count: 2
    PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
    executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
       Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
         List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
         List 1: 400035313
    PrepareRowSetForQueryDetail
    executeQueryForCollection_Detail user param: 2
       Object 2: class [Ljava.lang.Object;
         List 0: Bind_ChildId -> viewLink parameter
         List 1: 400035321
    getEstimatedRowCount_Root
    count: 2
    getEstimatedRowCount_Root
    count: 2Values of user parameters are OK. Is there another method that i should override?
    I also noticed, that if detail view doesn't have user bind variables, the tree works fine and is shown even in ADF BC (aplication module).
    I guess we loose a tree, when using bind variables in detail view object.
    Is there a way around it?

  • Af:query with bind variables and Saved Search

    I have a VO and view criteria(VC).
    VC has a criteria item ObsoleteDate with range specified as bindVariables "dateFrm" and "dateTo" I dragged & dropped the named criteria as af:Query with table. Table toolbar has 2 buttons in which I set & clear the bind variables. Data is fetched as per as expected based on the VC & bind variables.
    The problem is,
    If I save my search with bind variables set and swap between the saved searches , all works fine. But the moment I clear bind variables & swap between searches.. "dateFrm" is populated and "dateTo" is null and I get an Exception oracle.jbo.AttrValException: JBO-27035: Attribute Obsolete Date: is required.
    Why is this happening?? Saved search is supposed to save the VC with all the bind values set while saving and clearing bind variables shouldn't affect the saved search, right?? Or I have understood it wrong?
    I am using JDeveloper 11.1.2.3.0
    Thanks

    Try
    like ? || '%'

  • Oracle APEX 4.0  -  Interactive Report - Table Column Filter Issue

    Environment: Oracle APEX 4.0  -  Interactive Report - Table Column header Filter Issue
    We have developed an interactive report using Oracle APEX 4.0, which contains a record count of around 3,000 Rows. All the rows values are unique in nature. When we try to filter the same with the help of column header filter option available in the interactive report,We get only 1000 records.
    Could some one help us, why this behaviour under APEX Table Column Header Filter as if it does not display beyond 1000 distinct values.
    Is there a way or workaround on how to get all the records in the column header filter?
    Thanks in advance.
    Krish

    Hi
    Thanks for the advice and this issue has been moved to the below URL
    Oracle APEX 4.0 - Interactive Report - Table Column Filter Issue Posted: No
    Krish

  • ODT Query Window. Query with binding variable?

    I have the ODT 11.1.0.7.20 installed.
    In "Query Window", I execute an SQL with binding variables. But I only get ORA-01008 errors. How do I do that?
    I want to double click an SQL and load it in "Query Window". How do I do that?
    I want to right click an SQL and select "Open with Query Window". How do I do that?
    In Query Window I want to load an SQL either by drag and drop or by select a function "Open SQL". How do I do that?
    Why none of these functionalities work as you could expect?
    Thanks,
    Tobias

    Finally i found the problem..
    The problem was that i had to remove one line from the properties of my table departments, the property: selectedrowkeys, because it only passed the last selected row.
    Still, i apreciate the help and i had to replace some code in the bean.java , because of the exception error and you didn't had to do that. Maybe i did some configuration in the wrong way and it went wrong.
    Thanks for the help.
    Regards,
    Frederico.

  • RESTful service and BLOB with bind variable

    Hi,
    Has anyone successfully created a RESTful service with bind variable to retrieve a BLOB field and render it in an Apex app? I can create RESTful web service and render BLOB field for a record with no bind variable (single row). As soon as I add bind variable my RESTful service fails -- I get 404 Error. Without bind variable it renders both in TEST tool of Workspace and direct URL. As soon as I add a bind variable it fails either way. I have reported this in an SR to Oracle support, but thought I would post here too.
    I would also like to retrieve the photo into an Apex application. Any hints would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pat

    Hi Fateh -
    Good question. You would identify the source type as a Media Resource, and use an SQL statement with the primary key and the BLOB column. When you use Media Resource, you are essentially telling your Database Cloud Service not to marshall the data, just to send it - which is exactly what you are looking for.
    With this implementation, you would have to have a separate SQL call for each BLOB retrieval. However, you might be able to use a PL/SQL block as the end point for the RESTful Service and take care of multiple BLOB processing in the block.
    Hope this helps.
    - Rick Greenwald

  • Create collection from query with bind variable

    Apex 4.0.2
    Per Joel Re: Collection with bind variable the apex_collection.create_collection_from_query_b supports queries containing bind variable references (:P1_X) but I am not sure how to use this feature, the documentation doesn't have an example, just the API signature for the overloaded version has changed.
    If the query contains 2 bind variable references to session state (:P1_X and :P1_Y), can someone please show an example of what to pass in for the p_names and p_values parameters to the API?
    Thanks
    procedure create_collection_from_query_b(
        -- Create a named collection from the supplied query using bulk operations.  The query will
        -- be parsed as the application owner.  If a collection exists with the same name for the current
        -- user in the same session for the current Flow ID, an application error will be raised.
        -- This procedure uses bulk dynamic SQL to perform the fetch and insert operations into the named
        -- collection.  Two limitations are imposed by this procedure:
        --   1) The MD5 checksum for the member data will not be computed
        --   2) No column value in query p_query can exceed 2,000 bytes
        -- Arguments:
        --     p_collection_name   =  Name of collection.  Maximum length can be
        --                            255 bytes.  Note that collection_names are case-insensitive,
        --                            as the collection name will be converted to upper case
        --     p_query             =  Query to be executed which will populate the members of the
        --                            collection.  If p_query is numeric, it is assumed to be
        --                            a DBMS_SQL cursor.
        -- example(s):
        --     l_query := 'select make, model, caliber from firearms';
        --     apex_collection.create_collection_from_query_b( p_collection_name => 'Firearm', p_query => l_query );
        p_collection_name in varchar2,
        p_query           in varchar2,
        p_names           in wwv_flow_global.vc_arr2,
        p_values          in wwv_flow_global.vc_arr2,
        p_max_row_count   in number default null)
        ;

    VANJ wrote:
    Apex 4.0.2
    Per Joel Re: Collection with bind variable the apex_collection.create_collection_from_query_b supports queries containing bind variable references (:P1_X) but I am not sure how to use this feature, the documentation doesn't have an example, just the API signature for the overloaded version has changed.
    If the query contains 2 bind variable references to session state (:P1_X and :P1_Y), can someone please show an example of what to pass in for the p_names and p_values parameters to the API?Not tried it, but guessing something like
    apex_collection.create_collection_from_query_b(
        p_collection_name => 'foobar'
      , p_query => 'select f.foo_id, b.bar_id, b.baz from foo f, bar b where f.foo_id = b.foo_id and f.x = to_number(:p1_x) and b.y = :p1_y'
      , p_names => apex_util.string_to_table('p1_x:p1_y')
      , p_values => apex_util.string_to_table(v('p1_x') || ':' || v('p1_y')))

  • Problem with bind variable in a procedure

    Hi Experts,
    I'm migrating forms from 5 to 6i. And in most of the forms I'm getting the error in the procedure "G$_KEY_OPT_MENU".
    This is the most common error I'm getting in almost like 30 forms.
    The error is:
    Error 49 at line 21, column 3
    bad bind variable "SELECT_ITEM"
    Error 49 at line 22, column 3
    bad bind variable "SELECT_ITEM"
    Error 49 at line 21, column 3
    bad bind variable "OPT_SEL"
    Error 49 at line 21, column 3
    bad bind variable "OPT_SEL"
    Error 49 at line 50, column 3
    bad bind variable "SELECT_ITEM"
    PROCEDURE G$_KEY_OPT_MENU (ITEM_NAME_IN IN CHAR,
                               SEL_A_DESC IN CHAR,SEL_A_KEY IN CHAR,
                               SEL_B_DESC IN CHAR,SEL_B_KEY IN CHAR,
                               SEL_C_DESC IN CHAR,SEL_C_KEY IN CHAR,
                               SEL_D_DESC IN CHAR,SEL_D_KEY IN CHAR) IS
         ITM          VARCHAR2(1);
         DESC_VAR     VARCHAR2(36);
         KEY_VAR      VARCHAR2(30);
         ITEM_ID      ITEM;
    BEGIN
      ITEM_ID := FIND_ITEM(NAME_IN('SYSTEM.CURSOR_BLOCK')||
                   SUBSTR(NAME_IN('SYSTEM.TRIGGER_ITEM'),
                   INSTR(NAME_IN('SYSTEM.TRIGGER_ITEM'),'.'),
                   INSTR(NAME_IN('SYSTEM.TRIGGER_ITEM'),'_LBT')-1 -
                   INSTR(NAME_IN('SYSTEM.TRIGGER_ITEM'),'.')+1));
      IF ID_NULL(ITEM_ID) THEN
         IF G$_DISPLAY_ALERT('','The Button you pressed is outside the current block') IS NOT NULL
            THEN RAISE FORM_TRIGGER_FAILURE;
         END IF;
      END IF;
      :SELECT_ITEM := '';
      :OPT_SEL := '';
      For Loop and some conditions, setting properties.
      GO_ITEM('G$_OPT_BLOCK.OPT_SEL');
      :SELECT_ITEM := ITEM_NAME_IN;
    END;Edited by: user12290512 on Mar 14, 2011 2:16 PM

    FRM-18108: Failed to load the following objects.Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: G$_WARNING_ALERT
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: G$_OPT_BLOCK
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: G$_OPT_CANVAS
    Source Module:COQOLIB
    Source Object: CTRDETC_CHG_LOV
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: GUROPTM_LOV
    Source Module:COQOLIB
    Source Object: CTRDETC_PMT_LOV
    Source Module:COQOLIB
    Source Object: CBBDACC_ACCOUNT_ID_LOV
    Source Module:COQOLIB
    Source Object: CBBDACC_ACCOUNT_ID_RG
    Source Module:COQOLIB
    Source Object: CTRDETC_PMT_RG
    Source Module:COQOLIB
    Source Object: CTRDETC_CHG_RG
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: GUROPTM_RG
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: G$_NVA_LOV
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: G$_NVA_BUTTON_ITEM
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: G$_NVA_TEXT_ITEM
    Source Module:GOQOLIB
    Source Object: G$_OPT_WINDOW
    And all the source objects listed above are in GOQOLIB form. >
    This is "KEY" piece of information that should have been included in your original post. As you are fairly new to the Oracle Forums, you might want to take a few minutes to review the following:
    <ul>
    <li>Before posting on this forum please read
    <li>10 Commandments for the OTN Forums Member
    <li>Announcement: Forums Etiquette / Reward Points
    </ul>
    These threads will help you ask more thorough questions! The more information you can provide about the issue you are having the better able we (the community) are to give you a solution. ;-)
    Craig B-)
    Edited by: CraigB on Mar 15, 2011 9:27 AM

  • Problem with Bind Variable in 11.2

    Hi
    I have a slow statement with bind Variables. With literals it works fine. Is there a way to replace the bind by literal in advanced ? I use Release 11.2.0.2.3
    Thank you

    904062 wrote:
    I have a slow statement with bind Variables. With literals it works fine. Is there a way to replace the bind by literal in advanced ? I use Release 11.2.0.2.3This specific scenario is very much an exception to the rule - and you need to back your statement up with execution plans of the SQL with bind variables and with literals, and run stats that show the difference between these two execution plans.
    See the {message:id=9360003} from the {forum:id=75} forum's FAQ for details on how to post a SQL performance tuning question.

  • Query with bind variable, how can use it in managed bean ?

    Hi
    I create query with bind variable (BindControlTextValue), this query return description of value that i set in BindControlTextValue variable, how can i use this query in managed bean? I need to set this value in String parameter in managed bean.
    Thanks

    Put the query in a VO and execute it the usual way.
    If you need to, you can write a parameterized method in VOImpl that executes the VO query with the parameter and then call that method from the UI (as a methodAction binding) either through the managed bean or via a direct button click on the page.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ipod touch USB doesn't fit

    I just got a new 32 GB ipod touch but the ipod side of the wire doesn't fit. I'm not really sure why this would be happening and does anyone have any ideas?

  • Default page size in Safari

    I can't seem to find a way to keep my Safari's setting after I've properly sized the browser page after Safari loads. After I load Safari I hit "Command +" twice and that sets the size perfectly for my eyes, monitor size, and Safari window size. How

  • Mac os x lion 10.7 on mac book pro not updating and running very slow

    i am using mac os x lion 10.7 problem it is not updating and running very slow. How to improve?

  • Visual design?

    Hello all, I am wondering if this is the right tool for what I am after. What I am wanting is a tool to create a visually appealing diagram of a database or at least several tables. I have used data modeler in school but it is not what I would call v

  • [WORKAROUND] Cannot connect to any WiFi network after resume

    Hi, I'm having one weird problem that makes my laptop not as mobile as I'd like it to be.. Literally, I have to boot it up again after each move. Here's the issue: if I suspend to ram, and then resume in a place with different WiFi network, it can't