Low performance with new release?

Was forced to download the new Skype "app" as the stock one on my laptop no longer allows you to connect. This is the only recent change on my laptop and when connecting to video with the same person in their same locale and me in my same locale, the performance is absolute crap. You can't move or same more than 5 words without the performance dropping. I've gone so far as to shut off other devices in my house to increase bandwidth and the problem persists. Eliminating all other outside factors and having Skype as the only other change, I've concluded this "new" version is a fat turd. Sincerely,Jared Hazen

Hi and welcome to the Skype Community,
Can you share which computer / tablet model you are using?

Similar Messages

Issue with New Release Deploying Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010

Previously I created a deployment project with Visual Studio 2010 using the Beta 2 release of the distributable. This worked fine and installed on a 32-bit XP machine.
I've since updated the project to use the new Release version of the distributable CRRuntime_32bit_13_0.msi. Now when I run the installed program it gives me the following message -
"An error has occurred while attempting to load the Crystal Reports runtime. Either the Crystal Reports registry key permissions are insufficient, or the Crystal Reports runtime is not installed correctly. Please install the appropriate Crystal Reports redistributable (CRRedist*.msi) containing the correct version of the Crystal Reports runtime (x86, x64, or Itanium) required. Please go to http://www.businessobjects.com/support for more information."
I've had a look at verious posts and added code to the app.config file so it looks like -
<startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.0"/>
</startup>
and also tried targetting various .NET frameworks, but without success.
Am I missing something?

Hello,
More info, are you installing on the same PC as the Beta was installed on or a clean PC?
Your app must be set to the full framework, not the client version.
Are you installing by right clicking on your setup.exe and selecting run as administrator?
Setting that option in the app.config is only required if you are using that driver you found the info on.
Run ProcessMonitor and set it to filter your installer and see what it reports.
Thank you
Don

Configuration tool issue with new release

With this new release - September 2013 - We have found that when doing find products (as opposed to enter sku) the option to add seems to work - it gives a message that its added. But when returning to config the SKU has not been added. Its a bit anyoying as you then have to re-enter the SKU to add the product. - Several staff have observed this at our site.. Others ?

Hello Hsummons,
Thank you for brining this to our attention and we sincerely apologize for inconvenince this might cause.
Please be informed that in order for us to process your request with the steps to take on this concern. We are requesting that you may open a case with us or you may us at CCW Support 1-800-553-6387 options 2 and 3 or you may email us at [email protected] or [email protected]
With this, we may be able to assist you with the CCW Tool. Again, we aplogize for the inconevenience.
Thanks,
Jen
CCW Support Team

Gaming Performance with New MacBook

Hey I am going to buy the new macbook soon I think and I had a few questions corresponding to gaming performance with the MacBook, in particular running AmericasArmyOperations with bootcamp and windows xp.
I currently have the last years model 20" iMac 2.4GHz processor with 4GB ram. I run the game smoothly at full graphics and get over 60fps with all settings turned up. I think 60 is the max you can get because it wont move above it, yet never really goes under either.
Does any1 know the performance abilities of the new MacBooks and the new video cards? Will I need the 2.4GHz MacBook or will the 2.0GHz and 4GB of upgraded ram be sufficient? I don't need to run the game at full details, just enough to get like 20-30 fps on the lowest settings. Do you think the new MacBooks can run it? I know the MBP can do it for sure, just curious if I can opt for a cheaper solution of only 1200$

i dont know anything about fps but i can tell you i bought the 2.0 processor aluminum macbook and i play the following games in BOOTCAMP:
-gears of war
-fifa 09
-pes 09
-scarface
-need for speed undercover
-call of duty 5
all of those run at full graphics except cod 5 it runs on medium/low

MBP Retina low performance with external displays

Hi everyone!
I have a very bad performance with my MBP 15´´ retina display when it comes to ad an external display. I have a FUL HD LG monitor that looks very bad when i connect the HDMI or the thunderbot port with the proper adapter (as bad as you can´t even read). I want to know if this may ba a hardware problem just with my computer or if it is a software problem, any ideas? does anyone have the same issue?
How can i update my NVIDIA card???
Thanks a lot!

Topic seems to come up here often. Apple has a tendency to dismiss the issue.
Its a pretty well known problem that Mac font smoothing doesn't seem to work well on high resolution third party external displays, making text hard to read. In addition, I think the Mac HDMI resolution support is limited to 1080p, so you must use DP or DVI video interfaces to see full monitor resolution.
The OS default is no font smoothing on external displays (except perhaps the apple display). There is a terminal command that will enable font smoothing for any external monitor, but it often doesn't work well enough. I found that using the OS zoom feature magnifies text to the point to be easily readable. You can set zoom parameters in the accessibility systems preference panel.
For some reason, sometimes the Mac OS thinks some monitors are TVs and use YCbCr instead of RGB. You can open the color sync utility and brouse the settings to see what is being used. There are scripts available that can fix that but are more complicated to install than an app.
It seems that PCs are way ahead of Macs with external display implementation. Most folks having monitor problems with a Mac do not see the same issue with PCs or Unix/Linux OSs.
Oh as far as updating the video card, can't. The monitor "drivers" are built into the OS. When a new display is connected, the OS finds the profile for it.

Low performance with SATA on 875P Mobo

I have a 160GB WD with 8MB buffer un SATA and a 80GB WD with 2MB buffer un Paralel ATA. In Sandra I get 25000 kb/s with the first one and 31000 kb/s with the second one.
Why do i get such a low score with the SATA hard drive? The SATA is conected to the Intel controller, not the Promise
(I removed all the CD-rom drives and the 80GB hard and left only the SATA hard but nothing changes. I get the same 25000 kb/s)

Sandra is still not a good hdd benchmark program. Lood through this thread and you should find some links:
https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?threadid=26997&sid=

Performance issue with new release

Dear all,
11.2 rac with ASM on solaris sparc standard edition.
Client was using 10.2.0.3 on solaris 10 before and it is working fine.
after migrating the data to the new 11g instance ,we've a performance
degradation in the application. application forms 10.1.2.3 .Since we
are using stanard edition, there are not much options available for
tuning. the same application when tested with 11gr2 on windows (non-rac)
is more faster than the current prod and the newly installed ones.
I scheduled statspack and info from statspack
Top 5 Timed Events                                                    Avg %Total
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                   wait   Call
Event                                            Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time
CPU time                                                     2,468          87.0
Streams AQ: qmn coordinator waiting for s           18         103   5742    3.6
gc cr block busy                                   295          89    303    3.2
control file sequential read                   235,472          70      0    2.5
reliable message                                 8,701          24      3     .9
Host CPU (CPUs: 32 Cores: 4 Sockets: 1)
~~~~~~~~              Load Average
                      Begin     End      User System    Idle     WIO     WCPU
                       1.20    1.37      2.43    1.25   96.32    0.00    0.91
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~                                       % Time (seconds)
                     Host: Total time (s):                441,564.6
                  Host: Busy CPU time (s):                 16,239.3
                   % of time Host is Busy:       3.7
             Instance: Total CPU time (s):                  2,682.5
          % of Busy CPU used for Instance:      16.5
        Instance: Total Database time (s):                  3,249.6
%DB time waiting for CPU (Resource Mgr):       0.0
Memory Statistics                       Begin          End
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                ------------ ------------
                  Host Mem (MB):     16,256.0     16,256.0
                   SGA use (MB):      4,078.9      4,078.9
                   PGA use (MB):        418.6        415.2
    % Host Mem used for SGA+PGA:         27.7         27.6
          -------------------------------------------------------------Objects are indexes are the same across the environment.stats are updated, but the process is time consuming in the new environment.
Please let me know how to proceed ?
Kai

Kai,
Please take a look in the sqlnet.ora file on the client computer, you should find it in network/admin directory. In that file, do you see either of these two lines?
sqlnet.authentication_services = (NONE)
sqlnet.authentication_services = (NTS)The above might explain why the configuration is fast on a Windows server, but slow when a Solaris server is accessed.
To Mark's point, execution plans can change between different versions - in fact Oracle Database 11.2.0.2 will perform something called adaptive cursor sharing, where an execution plan (you cannot check this using EXPLAIN PLAN from SQL*Plus) will potentially change as different bind variable values are supplied. However, if the application parses once and then holds the cursor open, the adaptive cursor sharing likely will not happen on future executions within that application - an unfortunate initial parse with unusual bind variable values might trigger a hard parse on 11.2.0.2 (thus possibly changing the execution plan), even when that SQL statement had been previously hard parsed. Randolf Geist recently posted an article related to this topic:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2011/01/adaptive-cursor-sharing.html
Even with the Standard Edition of Oracle Database you still have a lot of options for troubleshooting this problem. In a 10046 trace file for a session look at the amount of time spent on the SQL*Net events. Do not look at just the summary provided by TKPROF, but look at the raw trace file. Is each SQL*Net related wait for a significant amount of time? If you do see long times for many of the SQL*Net waits, then you should focus your attention to the client, the server's network configuration, and the network hardware.
On the Standard Edition you can also look at the session level time model statistics and wait events to get a better idea of what is happening in the session. For example, if you have access to a spare Windows client computer you can try a script like the one in this blog article to help you review the time model statistics and dig into the session level time model statistics and wait events for a specific session:
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/working-with-oracle%e2%80%99s-time-model-data-3/
Charles Hooper
Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

Slow USB/drive performance with new (Oct 2011 release) MacBookPro

I am a Final Cut editor, and began using FCP X about three months ago. I was using my wife's 13" MacBook Pro (previous revision 2.7GHZ i7 dual core, 4GB RAM, OS X 10.6.8) to play with it, and I was able to edit a few projects from a USB 2 drive.
However, on my new (2.4GHZ i7 Quad core, 4GB RAM, OS 10.7.2 part: MD322LL/A) the same video project is choppy, and there's a spinning beach ball when quitting Final Cut that lasts about 25 seconds.
Any ideas why the newer MBP with better graphics and quad cores would be having more trouble with video playback than the (slightly) older dual core machine? The only other difference between them is my computer came pre-loaded with Lion, and the 13" has snow leopard. I don't think I can install Snow Leopard on the new computer to eliminate that variable.
I suspect there might be something going on with the USB port speeds, but beyond running the hardware test (doing it now) I don't know how to test this and know whether it's a "good" speed or not.
Thanks,
~Ryan

I am a Final Cut editor, and began using FCP X about three months ago. I was using my wife's 13" MacBook Pro (previous revision 2.7GHZ i7 dual core, 4GB RAM, OS X 10.6.8) to play with it, and I was able to edit a few projects from a USB 2 drive.
However, on my new (2.4GHZ i7 Quad core, 4GB RAM, OS 10.7.2 part: MD322LL/A) the same video project is choppy, and there's a spinning beach ball when quitting Final Cut that lasts about 25 seconds.
Any ideas why the newer MBP with better graphics and quad cores would be having more trouble with video playback than the (slightly) older dual core machine? The only other difference between them is my computer came pre-loaded with Lion, and the 13" has snow leopard. I don't think I can install Snow Leopard on the new computer to eliminate that variable.
I suspect there might be something going on with the USB port speeds, but beyond running the hardware test (doing it now) I don't know how to test this and know whether it's a "good" speed or not.
Thanks,
~Ryan

Very low signal with new WRT54G (V7.2) comparing with my old BEF1W1154

I bought myself a new WRT54G router to replace my old (but good working) b-router. With the old router I have a great signal in/outdoors.
With the new g-router I experience a low signal , even in the room were I installed the router. In other rooms or outdoors I don't have a signal at all.
Please advice

There are many causes for poor wireless connections, and many solutions:
First of all, give your network a unique SSID. Do not use "linksys". If you are using "linksys" you may be trying to connect to your neighbor's router. Also set "SSID Broadcast" to "enabled". This will help your computer find and lock on to your router's signal.
Poor wireless connections are often caused by radio interference from other 2.4 GHz devices. This includes wireless phones, wireless baby monitors, microwave ovens, wireless mice and keyboards, wireless speakers, and your neighbor's wireless network. In rare cases, Bluetooth devices can interfere. Even some 5+ GHz phones also use the 2.4 Ghz band. Unplug these devices, and see if that corrects your problem.
In your router, try a different channel. There are 11 channels in the 2.4 GHz band. Usually channel 1, 6, or 11 works best. Check out your neighbors, and see what channel they are using. Because the channels overlap one another, try to stay at least +5 or -5 channels from your strongest neighbors. For example, if you have a strong neighbor on channel 9, try any channel 1 through 4.
Also, try to locate the router about 4 to 6 feet above the floor, in an open area. Do not locate it behind your monitor or near other computer equipment or speakers. The antenna should be vertical.
Also, in the computer, go to your wireless software, and go to "Preferred Networks" (sometimes called "Profiles" ). There are probably a few networks listed. Delete any network named "linksys". Also delete any network that you do not recognize, or that you no longer use. If your current network is not listed, enter its info (SSID, encryption (if any), and key (if any) ). Then select your current network and make it your default network, and set it to automatic login. You may need to go to "settings" to do this, or you may need to right click on your network and select "Properties" or "settings".
If the above does not fix your problem, download and install the latest driver for your wireless card.
Some users have reported improved wireless performance by switching to WPA encryption.
If you continue to have problems, try the following:
For wireless g routers, try setting the "Transmission Rate" to 54 Mbps.
If you still have trouble, download and install the latest firmware for your router. After a firmware upgrade, you must reset the router to factory defaults, then setup the router again from scratch. If you saved a router configuration file, DO NOT use it.
Hope this helps.

Acrobat XI Pro performance with new Intel Core M processor

EDIT 21-Feb-2015: the issue seems to be with the power limitation of the new Intel Core M Broadwell processor. Enabling it in "full performance" mode significantly increases the performance. Nonetheless, in whichever power mode the computer is set, Microsoft Reader has no issue with any of the operations listed below.
Hi,
I'm running Acrobat XI Pro on Windows 8.1 64-bit with high-res display (3200x1800, Lenovo Yoga 3 Pro), which uses the new Intel Core M Broadwell processor.
Zooming in and out and panning on the main application is very laggy, and full screen is EXTREMELY laggy. Also very noticeable delays in scrolling and page to page.
The computer is brand new, out of the box, no viruses or other software dragging the system down. Also, if I open the same files on the Microsoft Reader app, there is no lag at all in doing these operations.
I have found on the forum that some people have had lag and disabled Protected View and Enhanced Security. However, Protected View is not enabled on my installation, and disabling Enhanced Security has no effect.
Right now I would say that the zoom/pan performance is worse even than on Reader on a 5 year old Windows XP machine I tried to compare to.
Is there some other settings in Acrobat XI that could cause this issue?
Thanks!
P.S. I couldn't find a more appropriate group other than "Acrobat Installation & Update Issues" as I didn't find a troubleshooting group or anything like that, but can re-categorize.

Hi Antonio,
You might want to file a Bug report at: https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform&loc=en
Regards,
Rave

Extension compatibility with new releases - any way to preview?

I have dozens of add-ons & whenever I upgrade to the current release, a number of them, some I consider critical, don't update. Is there any way to determine before hand which if any of my add-ons aren't compatible - other than, of course, checking out each one by hand in the add-on search.
I guess what I'm asking for is a utility that can scan all my add-ons and either show those that won't be compatible with a particular Firefox update, or that will at least list the latest acceptable Firefox version for each add-on (i.e. the max version). Then I can decide whether or not I want to upgrade.
And, yes, I can always back off to an older version if I have to, but that's a pain.
== This happened ==
Not sure how often
== whenever a new version of firefox is installed

Which forum are you using?
There is an add-on for phpbb called Topics Anywhere which
enables this.
http://www.afsvlaanderen.be/topics_anywhere/download.php
See
http://www.anats.org.au
Newest forum posts are shown in the top RHS corner.
Regards
John Waller

Low Performance with Oracle Client 11g R2

Hi Experts
I installed Crystal Report Server 2008 on Windows Server 2003. We use Oracle Client 11R2 to create an ODBC to link with an Oracle Database which installed on another Redhat Linux Server.
I found the performance of generating report by Crystal is really bad, it's a really simple SQL query.
Before the Oracle, we used the SQL Server 2005 as the database, the time to open the same report only took 1-3 seconds, but on Oracle it took more than 20 seconds.
Please help~~ thank you.

Hi Don
Thank you for your reply, I built a report by myself, it's really fast, so I think it's not the problem of ODBC.
I double checked the 'Query SQL' of the old report, it only took 3 tables and generate a SQL like hereafter,
then I checked this SQL on "SQL Developer", it's working fine, very fast.
I don't know why Crystal Report Server take so long time to generate this report.
ODBC
SELECT
a.CR01_NATURAL_PER_FLAG taxpayer_category,
CASE WHEN a.CR01_NATURAL_PER_FLAG='Y' THEN to_char(to_number(a.cr04_natural_per_id)) else to_char(to_number(a.cr10_legal_per_id)) END per_id,
to_char( to_number(a.cr01_internal_id)) cr01_internal_id,
nvl(a.CR01_TIN_ID,'') cr01_tin_id,
a.CSTD_TAXPAYER_STATUS,
a.CSTD_SECURITY_LEVEL_ID,
a.CSTD_CERTIFICATE_STATUS,
a.CR01_MISS_INFO,
a.CR01_ACT_START_DATE,
B.CSTD_TAXPAYER_TYPE,
d.CS04_ID,
f.CSTD_ACTIVITY_CODE
FROM tr01_taxpayer A,TR14_TAXPAYER_ACTIVE_TYPE B, TR16_TAXPAYER_OFFICE d,TR06_BRANCH_BUSINESS_ACTIVITY f
WHERE a.cr01_internal_id = d.cr01_internal_id
AND nvl(d.cr16_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=sysdate
and nvl(d.cr16_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>= sysdate
AND A.cr01_internal_id = B.cr01_internal_id
and nvl(B.cr14_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=sysdate
and nvl(B.cr14_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=sysdate
and a.cr01_internal_id = f.cr01_internal_id
and f.CR03_BRANCH_CODE = '000'
and nvl(f.cr06_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=sysdate
and nvl(f.cr06_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=sysdate
and f.CR06_PRIMARY_FLAG='Y'
EXTERNAL JOIN TAXPAYER.TAXPAYER_CATEGORY={?ODBC: NAME.TAXPAYER_CATEGORY} AND TAXPAYER.PER_ID={?ODBC: NAME.PER_ID} AND TAXPAYER.CR01_INTERNAL_ID={?ODBC: INTERNALID.CR01_INTERNAL_ID}
ODBC
select 'Y' taxpayer_category,to_char(to_number(a.cr04_natural_per_id)) per_id,
cr11_first_name||' '||cr11_second_name||' '||cr11_third_name||' '||cr11_last_name NAME
FROM
tr01_taxpayer A, TR11_NATURAL_PER_NAME B
WHERE cr01_natural_per_flag = 'Y'
and A.cr04_natural_per_id=B.cr04_natural_per_id
and nvl(b.cr11_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=sysdate
and nvl(b.cr11_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=sysdate
union
select 'N' taxpayer_category,to_char(to_number(a.cr10_legal_per_id)) per_id,
cr13_name NAME
FROM
tr01_taxpayer A, TR13_LEGAL_PER_NAME C
WHERE cr01_natural_per_flag = 'N' and A.cr10_legal_per_id = C.cr10_legal_per_id
and nvl(c.cr13_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=sysdate
and nvl(c.cr13_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=sysdate
EXTERNAL JOIN NAME.TAXPAYER_CATEGORY={?ODBC: TAXPAYER.TAXPAYER_CATEGORY} AND NAME.PER_ID={?ODBC: TAXPAYER.PER_ID}
ODBC
select distinct x.cr01_internal_id from
    (select to_char(to_number(cr01_internal_id)) cr01_internal_id from TR16_TAXPAYER_OFFICE where
    (nvl(cr16_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr16_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr16_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr16_start_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr16_end_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr16_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr16_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr16_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    AND to_char(cs04_id) = case when '{?p_taxoffice}' is null then to_char(cs04_id) else '{?p_taxoffice}' END
    ) x,
    (select to_char(to_number(cr01_internal_id)) cr01_internal_id from TR14_TAXPAYER_ACTIVE_TYPE where
    (nvl(cr14_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr14_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr14_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr14_start_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr14_end_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr14_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or(
    nvl(cr14_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr14_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and cstd_taxpayer_type = case when '{?p_taxpayerType}' is null THEN cstd_taxpayer_type else '{?p_taxpayerType}' END
    ) y,
    (select cr01_internal_id from(
    select to_char(to_number(cr01_internal_id)) cr01_internal_id,'Y' taxpayer_category
    FROM
     tr01_taxpayer A, TR11_NATURAL_PER_NAME B
    WHERE cr01_natural_per_flag = 'Y'
    and A.cr04_natural_per_id=B.cr04_natural_per_id
    and
    (nvl(cr11_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr11_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr11_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr11_start_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr11_end_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr11_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or(
    nvl(cr11_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr11_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and cr11_first_name||' '||cr11_second_name||' '||cr11_third_name||' '||cr11_last_name like
    case when '{?p_taxpayerName}' is null then cr11_first_name||' '||cr11_second_name||' '||cr11_third_name||' '||cr11_last_name else '%{?p_taxpayerName}%' end
    union
    select to_char(to_number(cr01_internal_id)) cr01_internal_id,'N' taxpayer_category
    FROM
     tr01_taxpayer d, TR13_LEGAL_PER_NAME C
    WHERE cr01_natural_per_flag = 'N' and d.cr10_legal_per_id = C.cr10_legal_per_id
    and
    (nvl(cr13_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr13_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr13_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr13_start_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or
    (nvl(cr13_end_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr13_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    or(
    nvl(cr13_start_date,to_date('1950-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))<=to_date('2011-05-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and nvl(cr13_end_date,to_date('3000-01-01 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss'))>=to_date('2011-05-31 00:00:00','yyyy-mm-dd HH24:mi:ss')
    and cr13_name like
    case when '{?p_taxpayerName}' is null then cr13_name else '%{?p_taxpayerName}%' end
    where taxpayer_category =
    case when '{?p_taxpayerCategory}' is null then taxpayer_category else '{?p_taxpayerCategory}' END
    ) z
where x.cr01_internal_id=y.cr01_internal_id
and x.cr01_internal_id=z.cr01_internal_id
EXTERNAL JOIN INTERNALID.CR01_INTERNAL_ID={?ODBC: TAXPAYER.CR01_INTERNAL_ID}
Edited by: WangGang0411 on Jul 3, 2011 12:27 PM

Extremely slow performance with NEW hdd

Ok guys, this is pretty frustrating. Today I bought 2 new external hdd's, same manufacturer, same model. One of them seems to work great, but the other one.. well look at this:
/dev/sdk1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 96 MB in 3.04 seconds = 31.53 MB/sec
bash-3.2# hdparm -t /dev/sdj1
/dev/sdj1:
Timing buffered disk reads: 4 MB in 4.30 seconds = 951.52 kB/sec
As you can see, my sdj is extremely slow - what could possibly be wrong here?

fukawi2 wrote:Is DMA enabled in the BIOS?
Probably - If it wasn't the other drive shouldnt behave like normal.
By the way:
bash-3.2# dmesg | grep -i ata.*dma
ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xfe02f000 port 0xfe02f100 irq 22
ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xfe02f000 port 0xfe02f180 irq 22
ata3: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xfe02f000 port 0xfe02f200 irq 22
ata4: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xfe02f000 port 0xfe02f280 irq 22
ata1.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD501LJ, CR100-11, max UDMA7
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata2.00: ATA-7: ST3320820AS, 3.AAD, max UDMA/133
ata2.00: configured for UDMA/133
ata3.00: ATA-8: SAMSUNG HD501LJ, CR100-12, max UDMA7
ata3.00: configured for UDMA/133
bash-3.2#

Troubles with newer releases of Java

At home, I am running Windows XP and at school I am using a Windows 98 SE computer to do my Java work on. On both computers they have the 1.40_01 SDK installed and I'm using jEdit on both of the computers. For some reason, I can compile .java files, but I can't run anything. I keep getting errors with the main method, but the method is correct. I also cannot view applets through the browser. Most of my project in in Swing, so creating a html file for viewing the applet isn't a problem.
Any Suggestions?

You say you can compile right?
But when you run your compiled program, you "keep getting errors with the main method",
but then you go on to say, "but the method is correct". That's a bit confusing.
I think if you want any help, you're gonna have to post those errors, even if those errors are in error!
Seriously though, I do nearly the same thing it sounds like you do, I have all my programs, etc... on one zip disk, and use it between different machines and operating systems to program, including XP. I've been doing this for about a year now without any problem. I'm pretty sure you've got an error in the program somewhere. You should post the code and errors, otherwise it's pretty hard for people to try to help you.
Oh, wait a sec, if you're 1000% sure your code is ok, but you get errors when you run it, maybe your classpath is wrong. I bet that's it. The error you're getting may even suggest that.

Very low performance with datasource 0BA_CMS_CAG_RBL_LINK

0BA_CMS_CAG_RBL_LINK takes very long time for extrat and get no
responseif we use infopackage to extract data from datasource
0BA_CMS_CAG_RBL_LINK,it takes very long time for extrat and even get no
response.
if we use rsa3 to test the datasource,it also be so.
i have tried to run infopackage to extract data from this datasource
but still not work at all.
it keep running for 3 days even no any response.

First, try applying the manual changes identified in [OSS Note 1277865 - EDI: Syntax error in IDoc (segment cannot be identified)|https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1277865] in your source SAP Financial Services system to see if that will resolve your issue.
If applying these manual changes does not provide resolution to your issue, you will probably need to create an SAP Message in the SAP Support Portal to have an SAP support processor review the issue and provide a recommended resolution.

Low performance with new release?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for