Low ping yet online gaming performs poorly

This has always been an issue with my BT ADSL connection. On paper it looks perfect for gaming; a solid ~23ms ping to UK servers (FastPath) with practically no jitter, a constant 4.5/0.25 mbps throughput yet online gaming (Xbox Live) shows way more lag than the ping figures would suggest, it's pretty poor.
Any suggestions as to why this could be? It's as if either my hardware (HomeHub4) or BTs network has a very low priority for gaming traffic (I game mainly during peak hours, as do most people I expect)
I'm currently testing a non BT router to see if the issue lies with the Home Hub. It's definitely looking better so far gaming wise (will need to test more though) but actual web browsing is noticeably slower with the same speedtest/ping results!?
All other hardware is removed from the network, cable to the Xbox has been swapped. Gaming performance is my primary concern and the BT connection is almost putting a stop my enjoyment of online play. 
My exhange is Infinitiy enabled but my cabinet not and seemingly no way to find out when it will be.

The current BT homehub which is Homehub3 is a very poor router in my opinion but I dont have any issues with online gaming when my connection works correctly.
Can you go to http://speedtester.bt.com/ and do a speed test
Also go http://192.168.1.254
then go to settings, advanced, broadband then connection and copy and paste the ADSL connection information here. 

Similar Messages

  • High Pings in online gaming

    I am having major ping issues with online gaming even playing on UK based servers it is jumpering constantly to the 700's range. I rang a pingtest.net and even that is showing a rating of D and saying that online gaming won't work. I download at between 600-900KB/s a second normally but online gaming is impossible atm.
    Is there anything I can do?

    it's not the servers as they are european based and everyone else has pings <200 so it is defiantly an issue with my connection as opposed to server side.
    I've tried a tracert on bbc.co.uk and this looks way to high:
    Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
    Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.
    C:\Users\Adam>tracert www.bbc.co.uk
    Tracing route to www.bbc.net.uk [212.58.244.70]
    over a maximum of 30 hops:
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  api.home [192.168.1.254]
      2   106 ms   105 ms   123 ms  217.32.147.3
      3   139 ms   116 ms   139 ms  217.32.147.30
      4   107 ms   111 ms   138 ms  213.120.177.74
      5   160 ms   108 ms   129 ms  217.32.24.66
      6   134 ms   133 ms   135 ms  217.32.24.182
      7   109 ms   106 ms    96 ms  acc2-10GigE-0-1-0-5.l-far.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.1
    59.249.210]
      8   102 ms   119 ms   155 ms  core1-te-0-0-0-0.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.2
    49.157]
      9   113 ms   141 ms   186 ms  peer2-xe10-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.
    254.128]
     10    80 ms   139 ms   118 ms  194.74.65.42
     11   103 ms   145 ms   110 ms  212.58.238.153
     12   113 ms   108 ms   109 ms  212.58.239.62
     13   127 ms   111 ms   110 ms  212.58.251.44
     14   124 ms   147 ms   123 ms  bbc-vip115.telhc.bbc.co.uk [212.58.244.70]
    Trace complete.
    C:\Users\Adam>

  • Macbook air 2011 online gaming with Intel HD 3000?

    I was wondering whether I could buy a McBook Air with online gaming performance... The video card Intel HD 3000, would it perform well enough with games like Warbirds from iEN ?
    Thaks for the input.
    docmontreal

    Hi doc,
    From their website - http://www.totalsims.com/requirements.php
    The Intel HD 3000 has triple the VRAM memory allocation and the GPU (although shared) is superior to the Radeon 9800.
    It'll definitely get the job done. Were there any other games you were interested in playing as well?

  • Unreasonably low gaming performance, reasonably stout machine

    I have heard plenty of people having problems with their computers in regards to gaming but I wanted to see if anything has been figured out.
    My specs are:
    27" iMac Core i7 (mid-2011 model)
    3.4ghz
    quad core
    8gb ram
    768gb HD partition, 250gb free
    AMD Radeon HD 6970M, 2gb video memory
    When I first got this computer it was a fantastic gaming computer even when running OS X.  When I first installed Diablo III on it I was getting between 40-60fps easily.  Borderlands 2 was smooth as silk in the highest settings and at native resolution.
    A year or so passed and I started gaming on the PC side with games that weren't available on the Mac.  I started noticing that my gaming performance really seemed to lag behind the PC side.  I booted up Borderlands 2 and now at the same settings as before it is unplayable.  I estimate no more than 10fps.  Diablo III is getting 6-8fps.  On the PC side Diablo is getting a solid 60fps with max settings.
    It's obviously not the computer hardware itself.  Something changed between August of 2012 when I received this computer and now.  I believe the computer came installed with Mountain Lion (10.8) and I followed up the next year by installing Mavericks (10.9).  I did a clean install of Yosemite the other day and I am STILL having problems.  I am at my wits end.  This is the first time in 25 years (Apple IIgs was first) of owning Apple products where I am not able to rectify my own problems and honestly, my PC partition has yet to give me any problems so it is making me feel like I made a mistake buying a Mac.
    I realize the Mac isn't as good of a gaming computer as a PC... I get that.  But when a game is working fine one day and a year later is unplayable... GRRRR.
    I am open to ideas.
      Model Identifier: iMac12,

    Thanks but I read that in several places already.
    I stated that I had this problem in Mavericks as well.  Working on downloading the Mavericks installer and I'm going to try a wipe and install (of mavericks) to see if that fixes it.

  • Ideal BIOS Settings for online gaming

    this is my 1st computer that i built. i have a lot of experience in wiring high-end electronics, so wiring this little rig with barely any visible wires/cables was a breeze. I bought the processor/mobo with the intention of only doing minor O/C as i dont really know all that much on the hardware side of improving performance. with that said, i've searched for timings and settings for my specific combination, and i cant find any. again, i dont really want to push the config past a safe level, as i will be selling this machine when the 64's come down in price. can someone help me set the proper frequencies/timings? i have a lot to learn, and even in the normal bios settings i don't know if certain things should be enabled or disabled for my main purpose, which is to simply play 3D online games very  fast. i will be changing out the GeforceFX5200 PCI for a 5600 AGP in a week or so. I'm noticing that my old Comcrap PIII 1.0Ghz w/512SDRAM with this video card gets just as good a ping ingame as this rig does. the machine starts quickly, runs offline programs quickly, but online it isnt as fast as i'd hoped. from what i've read in the other forums, there are many settings in the bios that are enabled by default that don't need to be. can someone help me decipher which settings are useful and which are not. i loosely understand some of the settings but if someone could help with the questions below and/or do a walkthru for bios geared toward gaming i'd really appreciate it. The machine runs very cool (CPU 104*F/SYS 93*F) but i dont know what else needs adjustment. I simply want to make this machine go as fast and as hard as it can with the right config. i don't want to unlock the processor yet or do anything else major at this point.
    1: Best yet safe Voltage for my processor and RAM
    2: FSB clock; 133 or 166? had problems @ 200
    3: S.M.A.R.T. on or off?
    4: Best IRQ/PCI slot for video card
    5: "GoodMEM" utility: how much should i safely allot?
    6: Video BIOS Cacheable?
    7: Multiplier setting for K7N2DeltaL & XP2600+
    8: VGA Aperture (my card is 128MB but PCI. upgrading soon)
    i'll be learning more as i go along, so i dont really need a full explanation of what's what, lol THIS TIME. all i need is a rundown where someone tells me what to leave alone, and what to change for a very fast yet safe gaming rig

    OK I'm officially confused.
    I bought the retail boxed AthlonXP2600+, which clearly states on the packaging "With 333 MHZ Frontside Bus". i bought the board over others, one reason being it supported 400MHz FSB. I go into "Advanced Chipset Features" and when i set the "System Performance" to "Manual", i can then go into the "CPU FSB Clock" settings, but the max it will allow me to go to is 233MHz (which won't boot and i have to flip the jumpers. when i had set it to 200MHz before, it failed to boot as well... PLEASE can someone look over these settings and tell me the OPTIMAL settings for taking this combo as fast as it can go w/o overclocking? What am i doing wrong? what multiplier do i need to be at. I'm under the impression that the combo works best when the clock speed of the board is at the same speed as the processor. here are the  BIOS settings with which i need advice:
    ADV. BIOS
    Virus Warning                                [Disabled]
    External Cache                              [Enabled]
    Quick Boot                                    [Enabled]
    1st Boot                                        [Floppy]
    2nd Boot                                       [HDD]
    3rd Boot                                       [CD]
    Boot Other Device                         [Enabled]
    Swap Floppy                                 [Disabled]
    Seek Floppy                                  [Enabled]
    Boot Up Num Lock LED                   [On]
    Gate A20 Option                            [Fast]
    Typematic Rate Setting                  [Disabled]
    Security Option                             [Setup]
    APIC Function                               [Enabled]
    MPS Table Version                        [1.4]
    BOOT OS/2 for DRAM>64MB          [No]
    HD S.M.A.R.T.                               [Enabled]
    Video BIOS Cacheable                  [Enabled]
    ADV. CHIPSET
    System Performance                    [High Performance]
    CPU FSB Clock                             [166MHz]
    AGP 8x Support                           [Enabled]
    AGP Fastwrite Support                  [Enabled]
    System BIOS Cacheable               [Disabled]
    Video RAM Cacheable                   [Enabled]
    AGP Aperture Size                        [128MB]
    I do currently have a PCI GeForceFX5200 8o, but im getting an AGP FX5600 this week. i know my card has nothing to do with AGP, but i've left most of the AGP settings alone since i'll be using it later. is this creating a bottleneck or tying up system memory to have it this way for now?
    FREQUENCY/VOLTAGE CTRL
    AGP Clock Value [Default]
    xAGP Clock Value [66]
    AGP Voltage Adjust [1.5V]
    DRAM Voltage Adjust [2.7V]
    CPU Ratio [By H/W]
    CPU Vcore Select [By H/W]
    PCI Clock Auto-Detect [Enabled]
    Again, I have an 333MhzFSB Chip and a board that will support up to 400MhzFSB. help!

  • BT Infinity and online gaming - has BT changed tra...

    We use our internet a great deal for online gaming and a few months ago on our old ISP games started to become unplayable due to extremely slow response times. After a great deal of investigation I discovered the reason for this...
    Some ISPs examine the sort of data being transferred and when they think the data is Peer-To-Peer traffic they place this in a low-priority queue.  Historically, most people didn't care as 99% of P2P traffic was illegal file-sharing.
    BUT, online games are increasingly making use of data packet formats that 'look' like P2P traffic.  The gaming data is incorrectly identified as being P2P file-sharing and placed in a low priority queue.  This makes online gaming, where responses need to be made in fractions of seconds impossible - you often just stand still for 5 seconds while the rest of the world moves on.
    This is what happened with our old ISP and why we looked around for a new provider. Infinity recently came to our area and while browsing the Infinity information on the BT site I was asked if I wanted to speak to a customer service rep.  I wasn't expecting a very helpful discussion, but figured it couldn't do any harm to ask a very specific question:  "Do you perform traffic-shaping on P2P traffic?" -  the rep went away to find out and then responded "BT never shape P2P traffic".  (I have screenshots of this conversation as it formed the basis of my decision to subscribe to Infinity).
    Flash forward a month.  We have Infinity and have been very pleased with it ..until tonight when the same problems started again.  
    Several speed-test sites report pings about 20ms, download speeds of 30-40mpbs  - all very nice, same it has been for the past month.
    BUT, tonight all online gaming has ground to a halt.  
    Typical pings reported in games like World of Warcraft have gone from 50-100ms to about 3000-5000s.
    Online chatter is FULL of people asking if anyone else is having problems; and yes, the ones I've spoken to are all on BT.
    So - 
    Have BT changed their policy ?
    Are they now aggressively shaping traffic it thinks is P2P-related ?
    Are the problems tonight related to a temporary glitch or a permanent change in policy ?
    I'd really like to know as I've still got proof of BT's answer to a direct and specific question about this sort of policy and if it's changed will need to change ISPs and reclaim setup costs.
    Any information from anyone who knows about this would be most welcome.

    Hi ge1971,
    Welcome to the forums I'm sorry to hear of the problems you're having. I've posted an update on this issue here, so if you could keep an eye on that thread hopefully I'll have more info soon.
    Dean
    BTCare Community Mod
    If you like a post, or want to say thanks for a helpful answer, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Infinity and online gaming

    Hello
    I am relativly new to infinity and was wondering if anyone could tell me why its so bad for online gaming?
    My download speeds are virtually always 37.5mb download and between 8 - 9mb upload although upload drops sometmimes to slightly lower 
    http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/results.php?t=1333920063&v=15486878
    http://www.speedtest.bbmax.co.uk/results.php?t=1333920583&v=15486955
    however i always get loads of lag when playing on xbox live, to the point it is not worth playing, it gets worse than when I was on normal copper wire broadband.
    I have also noticed that there is quite a delay before web pages open when browsing the internet in general, my ping used to be pretty consistent at around 17 - 20ms before I switched to infininty but now seems to jump around lot even going as high as 300ms on occasion.
    my line profile seems to have set at 38.10mb which I am happy with, and the engineer who installed my infinity said that my line stats were excellent.
    all this said then why do i seem to be suffering when using xbox live??

    Hi Cameron
    No I have been trying it with the wireless disabled, although on our old connection this wasnt an issues, myself and my son could both use our xboxs together on the one connection and still it was better than at presen
    I didnt have the cable in the gigabyte port, I have now though, what does this port do?
    Yes port forwarding set to xbox live

  • Worse gaming performance than Kubuntu 12.10?

    Title.
    I'm using KDE 4.10 (installed kdebase package), Pulse, nVidia propietary drivers with VSync disabled, same programs than on Kubuntu, compositing manually suspended, yet performance is worse on TF2 and Serious Sam 3: BFE. FPS is high... enough, but the games stutter every few seconds, making them extremely annoying to play.
    Any ideas why this happens?
    And no, nothing strange on the console output.
    Not using a low latency kernel on Kubuntu, nor will I use one on Arch. Plus, according to Phoronix benchmarks, those usually reduce gaming performance.
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    frank604 wrote:
    Have you compared processes/services between arch and kubuntu?  Could you monitor cpu for spikes and see if any background processes is causing the stutter? 
    when you say nothing useful is output to console do you mean you are running 'steam' command in terminal and watching the output there?
    Any cpu frequency scaling?
    Double check the archwiki at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ga … g_policies
    Special highlight to core affinity and schedule daemon/policy.
    Sorry I'm not much help, just doing some "what ifs" with you.
    Compared to my laptops' Kubuntu 12.10 (I don't have Kubuntu installed anymore on my main machine) the only extra thing I had was Akonadi since I forgot to disable it. Disabled everything, file indexing, plus a couple of stuff I found I didn't need. No change in performance.
    Yup, running steam into terminal. Games launched by steam output on there too.
    CPU's not scaling, it's a regular Phenom II X2 on a desktop and nothing's wrong on BIOS.
    I did not need to do any scheduling on Kubuntu for the game to run. I am not aware of Kubuntu using some sort of daemon that does that automatically, if there is, I'll install it, but ferk no I will not mess with it for every game I want to play. This is a global issue, plus I've tried running TF2 with multiple multithreading settings and that didn't do anything (plus on Kubuntu I had it set up to use my cores on the most efficient way, and I'm on the same settings on Arch).
    Thanks.

  • Is BT Infinity good for Online Gaming...?

    I see many people on coming on complaining that they are getting many disconenctions, lag, high ping rates etc...which leads me to my question, Is BT Infinity good for online gaming?

    I came to infinity from VirginMedia where jitter is awful and your TBB graph would be full of yellow! On infinity my jitter is pretty much non existent and latency is very low.
    Regards,
    Paul

  • 4G online gaming doesnt work why? i need someone who actually cares to help me plse!!!

    my modem is Pantech UML290     .i  notice cannot play any online games...my old 3g modem works perfectly with the same games but this new service as far as online games or this modem apparently has issues...i have had nothing but problems, high ping rates and packet loss as well as jitter and no one with the exception of 1 service tech apparently cares...they only care that you can connect and brows web to a degree....i have spoke to 8 techs only one cares and states their is a problem....i have tested this on speedtest.com upload and download speed is fast remarkably fast but inconsistant, the ping is terible and jitter and packet loss is even worse...i am going to try to replace the modem as last form of troubleshoooting, if that doesnt work then 4g can go in the trash until they resolve the problem....they advertise online gameing and video streaming for 4g...i cannot do online gaming will not even connect to game host due to high pings and data loss...and yet the new service wich is supposed to be much better and support online gaming doesnt work and my 3g device works without a problem, can play games all day long without i hitch and no one from tech can explain why....sounds like a problem..i have spoke with several people on forums they have all said the same thing....release tech and dontr know how to fix the problems....the response you will get is all we care about is that you can connect and view the web!!! wow so when i buy a car i guess all they care about is the car moves, they dont care if the ac worrks or anything else does to...thats the way its been explained to me time and time again...except for 1 tech...   the games that i have tried to play is BATTLEFIELD BAD COMPANY 2,     CALL OF DUTY MODERN WARFARE 2 ,  STARCRAFT 2,  noNE will work,  note been playing with old 3g device and service for over a yr with no problems!!  SOMEONE PLSE HELP!!!

    I live out in the country and have no high speed internet so i bought the pantech UML290 and I have been able to play on the 4g network right out of the box. Plugin, install, and go. I Play Bad Company2 and my ping is usually 142. I connect to a chicago server from okc and my gameplay has improved so much more. I get 2 to 3 bars in my house and it flys on web pages.  I had the at@t lightning 3g and my pings on the same server were 185 but spiked up to 999 and back down to 180's . I love this UML290 and do not have Idea why you are having problems. I would return the uml and get another one. You might make sure the other communication software is uninstalled and worst case scenario, reformat the hard drive and start with a fresh install.  Can you give a description of your computer specs ?  Is this going through a cradlepoint router ? I would be happy to try to help, I know how much it sucks have a laggy gaming experience.  

  • Bad Latency ~ Online Gaming

    Note: This is my first time posting on Verizon Forums, so expect me to be noobish @ this.I apologize for any grammer mistakes, English isn't my primary language. Before making this post, i did search up "Latency" and i found about 6 other threads with the same issue and around the same time i found out about my terrible lag.
     ~The TRACEROUTES AND PATHPINGS ARE FROM A HARDWIRED CONNECTION~
    Links:
    http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/3077000702
    https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/running-a-pathping-test
    https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/performing-a-traceroute
    I have been playing online gaming for about 5years. I have been playing World of Warcraft(MMORPG) for about 4years. My DL speed is:56 and UL speed is:35. World of Warcraft has a built in meter that tells the latency at home and world(MS).  Somwhere around June 2013 my latency in game has spiked up from the normal # of 15-20 to 40-500. Through Verizon's POV this latency might seem normal. However, playing with lag everytime I play, makes me angry. After contacting Verizon about 6x i have given up hope for my issue to be solved.  The lag affects and limits the things i can do when playing the game. My connection is fine for everything else. It just happens to be World of Warcraft where the issues come in. I have done multiple Pathpings and Traceroutes to identify the issue.Aside, I have done multiple troubleshooting steps for both Verizon and Blizzard. After contacting Blizzard technicians, they have told me that the issue is through verizon's end. When i contact verizon , i get the same story over and over again. " There is nothing we can do!" I have actually talked to very unprofessional verizon representatives and have considered swapping ISP. However, let us be realistic-> Verizon is the best and no other company offers the same DL + UL. I have also considered uprgading to the 75/35 because Xbox One/PS4 is around the corner and adding another device that uses internet will be the ideal thing to do. I can't imagine if I will have these latency issues on my Xbox One.
    Enough of the chat, i will link couple trace routes and path pings.
    Traceroute(Around June):
    Tracing route to 63.240.161.189 over a maximum of 30 hops
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2     7 ms     7 ms     7 ms  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-70.verizon-gni.net [96.229.205.1]
      3    11 ms    12 ms    12 ms  G0-14-1-4.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.189.240]
      4    12 ms     9 ms    10 ms  so-4-1-0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.151.246]
      5    10 ms     *       10 ms  0.xe-3-0-0.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.114.241]
      6     9 ms    10 ms     9 ms  192.205.35.161
      7    62 ms     *       66 ms  cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.82.246]
      8    63 ms     *       63 ms  cr1.slkut.ip.att.net [12.122.30.29]
      9    75 ms    72 ms    76 ms  cr2.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.30.26]
     10    76 ms    74 ms    72 ms  cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.31.86]
     11    69 ms    71 ms   199 ms  gar18.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.99.21]
     12    70 ms    72 ms    62 ms  12.122.251.18
     13    71 ms    72 ms    71 ms  63.240.130.206
    Tracing route to 63.240.161.189 over a maximum of 30 hops
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2     7 ms     7 ms     6 ms  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-70.verizon-gni.net [96.229.205.1]
      3     8 ms    12 ms    11 ms  G0-5-3-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net [130.81.185.4]
      4    93 ms    49 ms    10 ms  so-6-0-0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81.29.124]
      5    11 ms     9 ms     9 ms  0.xe-3-0-0.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.114.241]
      6    11 ms     9 ms     9 ms  192.205.35.161
      7    69 ms    71 ms    69 ms  cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.82.246]
      8    67 ms    67 ms    66 ms  cr1.slkut.ip.att.net [12.122.30.29]
      9    70 ms    71 ms    72 ms  cr2.dvmco.ip.att.net [12.122.30.26]
     10    70 ms    71 ms    72 ms  cr1.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.31.86]
     11   160 ms   127 ms   107 ms  gar18.cgcil.ip.att.net [12.122.99.21]
     12   196 ms   226 ms   377 ms  12.122.251.18
     13    69 ms    76 ms    70 ms  63.240.130.206
    RECENT TRACEROUTES
    Traceroute1:
    Tracing route to 12.129.209.68 over a maximum of 30 hops
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2     7 ms     7 ms     7 ms  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-70.verizon-gni.net [96.229.205.1]
      3    18 ms    12 ms    11 ms  G0-5-3-0.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.185.2]
      4    13 ms     9 ms    20 ms  ae2-0.LAX01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.22.238]
      5     7 ms     9 ms    10 ms  0.xe-8-1-0.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.69]
      6    55 ms    49 ms    77 ms  192.205.35.161
      7    12 ms    12 ms    17 ms  cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.84.70]
      8     9 ms    12 ms    11 ms  gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.129.241]
      9     9 ms     9 ms    14 ms  12-122-254-238.attens.net [12.122.254.238]
     10    17 ms    14 ms    15 ms  mdf001c7613r0003-gig-12-1.lax1.attens.net [12.129.193.254]
    Traceroute2:
    Tracing route to 12.129.209.68 over a maximum of 30 hops
      1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2     7 ms     6 ms     8 ms  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-70.verizon-gni.net [96.229.205.1]
      3    12 ms    11 ms    10 ms  G0-5-3-0.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.185.2]
      4    38 ms    13 ms    11 ms  ae0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.22.246]
      5     9 ms    10 ms     9 ms  0.xe-9-1-0.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.65]
      6    12 ms    15 ms    11 ms  192.205.35.161
      7    12 ms    14 ms    14 ms  cr2.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.84.70]
      8    77 ms    13 ms    39 ms  gar20.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.128.181]
      9    12 ms    12 ms    13 ms  12-122-254-238.attens.net [12.122.254.238]
     10    12 ms    11 ms    12 ms  mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net [12.129.193.250]
    Pathping(Conducted on 11/3/13):
    Tracing route to 12.129.209.68 over a maximum of 30 hops
      0  Angel-HP.home [192.168.1.2]
      1  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
      2  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-70.verizon-gni.net [96.229.205.1]
      3  G0-5-3-0.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.185.2]
      4  ae0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.22.246]
      5  0.xe-9-1-0.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.65]
      6  192.205.35.161
      7  cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.82.246]
      8  gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.129.241]
      9  12-122-254-238.attens.net [12.122.254.238]
     10  mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net [12.129.193.250]
     11     *        *        *    
    Computing statistics for 250 seconds...
                Source to Here   This Node/Link
    Hop  RTT    Lost/Sent = Pct  Lost/Sent = Pct  Address
      0                                           Angel-HP.home [192.168.1.2]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      1    0ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      2  213ms     9/ 100 =  9%     9/ 100 =  9%  L100.LSANCA-VFTTP-70.verizon-gni.net [96.229.205.1]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      3   13ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  G0-5-3-0.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.185.2]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      4   15ms     2/ 100 =  2%     2/ 100 =  2%  ae0-0.LAX01-BB-RTR2.verizon-gni.net [130.81.22.246]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      5   16ms     1/ 100 =  1%     1/ 100 =  1%  0.xe-9-1-0.BR3.LAX15.ALTER.NET [152.63.115.65]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      6   16ms     0/ 100 =  0%     0/ 100 =  0%  192.205.35.161
                                  100/ 100 =100%   |
      7  ---     100/ 100 =100%     0/ 100 =  0%  cr1.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.82.246]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      8  ---     100/ 100 =100%     0/ 100 =  0%  gar29.la2ca.ip.att.net [12.122.129.241]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
      9  ---     100/ 100 =100%     0/ 100 =  0%  12-122-254-238.attens.net [12.122.254.238]
                                    0/ 100 =  0%   |
     10  ---     100/ 100 =100%     0/ 100 =  0%  mdf001c7613r0004-gig-10-1.lax1.attens.net [12.129.193.250]
    Trace complete.
    I had a pathping from June, can't find it anywhere..
    Thank you ahead of time! I hope my issue is fixed because i can't stand it anymore.

    You don't understand how irritated I am. Everytime i log ingame i start a normal "ms". I step into an arena game, my latency spikes up making my character run in place for about 4-6 seconds. I decided to keep it cool and expected it to eventually fix itself. Its been 5 months now, and the problem persists. I hope they fix this issue!

  • What Mac product is best for online gaming?

    I purchased a MacBook Pro for my daughter & she loves it. She was a little disappointed that she couldn't play some of her online games because the web browser wasn't compatible. Other than that she had no complaints.
    Is there a software that's needed in order to play online games? I'm not sure I want to purchase a Mac Desktop for the family & have issues with online gaming.
    Anyone have any suggestions?

    Well for browser based games you likely have to install Firefox and the Flash browser plugin, they are likely not accepting Safari in particular because of it's small market share.
    Firefox, Chrome and IE they have to support.
    https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/plugincheck/
    https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/
    Online gamming tend to mean heavy duty 3D games that are competitive, require a very powerful video card etc. for that really no Mac is ideal, a Windows 7 3D gaming tower is a more preferred option as the video cards can be upgraded.
    Sure one can play offline 3D games well on a Mac, but that's not as much fun as online competitive gaming is.
    For that you might want to consider a PlayStation 3 for lower cost, easier to use larger screen (HDTV) and a level playing field in hardware.

  • The problem with the gaming performance

    i am usin hp 15-g206ax notebook and it have a quadcore processor and 4gb ram and a 2gb graphic card but its gaming performance is not good Please tell me what i can do for improving the gaming performance

    There is not much to be done. You have the AMD HD 8570M graphics with dedicated video memory. That is in the lower middle of the spectrum as far as gaming is concerned. Way better than most laptops but way less powerful than a true gaming machine. Just keep the drivers current is about all. Turn down visual effects. There is no upgrade possible for the hardware.

  • OK WHATS THE BEST MOTHERBOARD AND CPU FOR ONLINE GAMING

    Here i go again thinking about stepping up on motherboaerds and cpus! If you have an opinion on which would make the best online gaming setup let me here you hollor! I will only go with intel so all amd lovers  dont bother! 

    He's better off with a Q6600 over the E6850, because you can clock the Q6600 to QX6850 speeds and it's quad core, so future proof anyway.
    And the Q6600 costs less.
    However the CPU will be very limited by that 7900GT.
    A 8800GTX or HD2900XT would be a better choice.
    EDIT: Get a G0 stepping Q6600, they have a lower TDP of 95w and require less voltage.

  • Slow gaming performance on Satellite Pro C660-2C7

    So my games run slow on C660-2C7 my video card is ATI mobility radeon hd 5470.
    Can I do something ? I tried the site canyourunit which says if u can or cannot and on Assassins creed revelations says that I can run it but once ingame it goes really slow
    null

    Well, not quite sure what games you are trying to play but require to read some articles about the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470. for example this:
    +Due to the higher clock rate (and GDDR5 support), the 3D gaming performance should be above the HD 4570 (predecessor with same TDP range). Therefore, all current games should be playable in low-medium details. Demanding games, like *Crysis, NFS Shift, or Modern Warfare ran on the HD 4570 for example only in low detail settings fluently.* Less demanding games like Left 4 Dead should run in high detail settings.+
    http://www.notebookcheck.net/ATI-Mobility-Radeon-HD-5470.23698.0.html
    So it depends always on the game and the requirements to the hardware

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can anyone help me with a 3 week old Infinity Conn...

    Hi Let me get it out there, I'm bored of BT, I'm bored of BT India and I'm bored of customer services moving you round to someone else and lying to you about what they said.  You find someone who says they want to help, then you call them back and th

  • Dynamic select query

    Hi, I am new to APEX. Trying to figure out how to implement a simple page that can take a select query defined by user at run time, for example, in a textbox, a user can type "select * from ***" (or any select statement) then hit submit. On the next

  • Warning message on NDMP backups

    Running OSB version 10.4.0.2 on Solaris11 update 1. When we attempt a client NDMP backup operation the jobs complete but with the following warnings about HW encryption. Does anyone have any idea why we would be seeing this. The backups are being wri

  • Save Work to File

    All, I have an application where students work on a graph drawing directly in Flash. They draw the graph with the mouse and I capture it and display it using Flash drawing API. I would like to save that drawing (either as data or as a graphic) to a f

  • ITunes refuses to sync apps due to lack of authorization, when it *is* authorized?

    Hey all, Just tried to sync my iPhone today, and received an error that 64/66 of my apps on my phone would be deleted unless I authorized my computer for them. Thought it was weird, since I'm already authorized, but figured I'd reenter my stuff anywa