Lowest value determination based on movement rate

Dear Experts,
in lowest value determination,what are
1. based on range coverage(mrn1)
2. based on movement rate (mrn2)
formula for this is : total recipts / qty in stock * 100 = say is 10%
if less than 15% then that deval % is applied(deval % is specified in Config).
now where do we specify this 15 %
Kind Regards
Sajid

Any Answers Please!!!!!!!!

Similar Messages

Lowest value determination

Dear Experts,
in lowest value determination,what are
based on range coverage(mrn1)
based on movement rate (mrn2)
formula for this is : total recipts / qty in stock * 100 = say is 10%
if less than 15% then that deval % is applied(deval % is specified in Config).
now where do we specify this 15 %
Pls give solution.
Kind Regards
Sajid

Hi
Is it the exception rule you are checking in MRN1 - exception rules - %?
Thanks

Lowest value determination including delivery costs

Hi friends,
is it possible to include delivery costs (as freight costs FRA1 and FRB1) in the lowest value determination MRN0 when comparing order prices as market prices?
Best regards,
Carsten

HI,
I have done this configuration to go to different GL Account
Example --for Freight(Seperate GL Account)
My requirement is
In PO
Material X       100/-    Cost centre-1024
Material Y       200/-    Cost Centre-1025
Invoice is
Material X       100/-
Material Y       200/-
Unplanned Delivery costs 30/-
After Posting MIRO it should come this way...
Material X       100/-   CC-1024
Material Y       200/-   CC-1025
Freight -charges- 10/- CC 1024
Freight -charges-20/- CC-1025
(Freight charges should go to different GL Account and also splitting the costs based on the PO item value)
could you please help me how this can be done.

Batch Determination based on date of consig recieve

Hi,
I am getting problem when i am trying to do manual batch determination in the outbound delivery.
I have created a record in VCH1 based on customer/Material/Plant. In this i have maintained a sort rule also. what characteristaics i must use to make my batch determination based on customer consignment recieving date?
If i go in MSC3n with Material, Plant and batch data then in the screen ( table MCHA, MCH1) onlt data available is for ERSDA, LAEDA and LWEDT.
In delivery when i click on batch determination button. my Sort rule is not automatically determined. So i have to maunally entered my soirt rule but at the same time my qty proposal in the same screen is 1 which is nothing but
FORM CHMVS_001.
DATA: lv_line TYPE kondh-chasp VALUE '1'.
LOOP AT disqty.
    CHECK lv_line <= no_of_split.
    IF QUAN_TO_DIS > 0.
      IF DISQTY-AVAL_QUAN > QUAN_TO_DIS.
        DISQTY-QUANTITY = QUAN_TO_DIS.
      ELSEIF disqty-aval_quan > 0.
        DISQTY-QUANTITY = DISQTY-AVAL_QUAN.
      ENDIF.
      IF disqty-quantity > 0.
        quan_to_dis = quan_to_dis - disqty-quantity.
        MODIFY disqty TRANSPORTING quantity.
        ADD 1 TO lv_line.
      ENDIF.
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM
When i am taking characteristics LOBM_VFDAT for sort rule in Cu70 then i am not getting batch determination as i required even if i maintained Shelf expiry date in MSC3n.
Please suggest where i must look into so that my batch determination would be based on date of consignment recieved.. currently if it s taking based on max qty available in MMBE.
Regards
Nitin

I have already assigned sort rule in VCH1 but dont know which Characteristics i must assign for customer consignment stock on FIFO basis. Could you please tell me the characteristics for it which i must consider?
LOMB_VFDAT i have already tried but its not working for me.
Edited by: Nitin Agarwal on Oct 30, 2008 8:14 AM

Warranty id not getting determined based on the warranty counter

Hi,
We are trying to determine the warranty id from the counter reading.
Scenario:
We are confirming the vehicle and the business partner and create a service order . We are entering the reading in the service order and want to get the warranty product determined based on the counter reading.
First free service at counter reading of 5000 kms
Second free service at counter reading of 10,000 kms
We have followed the following steps:
1. Warranty product with Warranty basis as Counter dependant and Warranty counter data with the value.
2. For the Vehicle object in relationships we have assigned a counter id.
However we are unable to determine the warranty id
Is there something that we are missing. Would really appreciate a solution.

Hi Ayan,
Firstly, whlich version of SAP CRM you are working on?
If it is CRM 5.0
Apply Note 1009244 - 'Counter attribute' field missing in CRM 5.0.
This note will get the counter attribute field in the Counter creation screen.
Check these steps again:
1. Create a counter warranty. Ensure nothing is excluded.
2. Create a counter and assign it prouct master or installed base component.
3. If you have assigned it to a product master, in the service transaction enter the reference data as well.
Ensure that warranty check profile has been assigned
4. Once you enter a service product your warranty must get determined.
5. If not, check the log in the warranty tab, it shall give u the details.
Wish it helps.
Regards,
Shalini Chauhan

Batch Creation or Batch Determination for 531 movement type

Dear Experts,
I have some confusion with Movement type 531 -
1) Can we do Batch determination for 531 movement type.
2) Can we do the automatic Batch creation at the production order level or confirmation level. In this case i have done the settings but in confirmation screen i have to create batch manually through Menu Path.
3) I have to enter characteristics value manually in confirmation screen as i have select classify batches in foreground. But in material master we have Batch Class type so can values comes from there to batch of confirmation screen.
Thanks & Regards,
Saurabh Kumar

Hello
Please read carefully notes 191368 and 194619. These are very old correction notes and they are already implemented on your system, however, they provide the following information about the system design:
For a by-product or co-product, no batch determination is executed anymore. The subsequent stock determination is not executed anymore either.
and
No batch determination for by-products may be executed during the confirmation.
It means that the batch determination for movemen 531 is not a functionality of the standard system.
I have never tested this scenario, however, as far as I know, the batch can be created automatically for the by-product if you are using internal number range on OMCZ.
BR
Caetano

Revenue Account Determination based on Sales Order Document Type & Service Order Type

Hi Expert,
I have Customer Service Module with Resource Related Billing for services attached with SD.
When DP90 runs sales document debit memo request is created & then debt memo is created.
I need to configure Revenue Account Determination based on Sales Order Type and also based on Service Order Type.
I did not see any field catalogue in revenue account determination for order type, For communication structure KOMKCV Header and KOMPCV Item level there is no field for sales order type nor service order type.
Is it possible to bring in both order types? Can ABAP person do it?
How to bring these fields?
Is it possible & recommendd to have service order type filed AURAT for service order into this sturcture?
Is this configuration is OK acceptable by SAP? If so is there any chnace for issues errors & wrong determination from FI CO view?
Your valued input is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Prakash Parikh

Hi Prakash,
Yes, you can certainly add new table fields into the field catalog KOMKCV and KOMPCV and use it during account determination. You will also have to add these new fields in the user exit RV60AFZZ for it to work. I believe you will need ABAPer's help to make this work. The abaper will have to crate a ZZFIELD (ZZAUART for example) and put it in the structure and use the same in the user exit to pass the values.
In your case, what I am not sure is, are you looking to modify the existing standard tables or creating new ones. My suggestion is to create the new condition tables with these new fields (like document type) after adding it to the field catalog. Only modify the access sequence (KOFI) in such a way that your new tables are access first before it goes into standard tables (or you can adjust it according to your scenario.
We have done it in our company and it is working fine. Basically what we have done is to create new tables instead of modifying the standard ones. We have adjusted the access sequence in such a way that some of our custom tables are accessed first before the standard SAP tables (C001 to C005).
I found a similar requirement on SCN. This might help.
Adding New Field in Account Determination
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Mukund S

Dynamic interface determination based on file content

Dear all,
I am trying for a while to solve my issue, but wasn't able to find the answer. Maybe you could point me in the right direction whether using standard or BPM...
I've got one file with multiple entries. Dependend on a field value, I would like to call the right interface and Idoc.
Sample message:
<customers>
     <customer>
          <name>ABC</name>
          <city>XYZ</city>
          <trigger>A</trigger>
     </customer>
     <customer>
          <name>DEF</name>
          <city>QRT</city>
          <trigger>A</trigger>
     </customer>
     <customer>
          <name>GHI</name>
          <city>JKL</city>
          <trigger>B</trigger>
     </customer>
     <customer>
          <name>MKN</name>
          <city>TZG</city>
          <trigger>A</trigger>
     </customer>
</customers>
Dependend on the content of field "trigger" I would like to send the message to the correct interface (Idoc). I was able to trigger the interface selection in my interface determination based on a condition. So I am looking for field trigger and if = A -> Interface A is called and if = B -> interface B is called. However, it seems it is only checking for the first entry of my payload and then sending all customers to the same interface, no matter what I've got in the trigger field. What I would need is a message split and then only posting the correct rows to the selected interface.
Any ideas would be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot,
Jens

Hi Jens,
I can think of two options:
1) The logical expression (condition) in the Interface Determination can hold a XPath expression. In your case, it could be complex, as one single XPath has to loop at all the line times for an occurrance.
Some XPath help is available at: http://www.w3schools.com/xpath/xpath_functions.asp#sequence
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/06/07/customise-your-xpath-expressions-in-receiver-determination
The objective will be to remove the contexts on the trigger node to get a sequence consisting only of the trigger values, and then performing an 'index-of' function on value 'A'. If the result is a null value, then that trigger does not exist and the interface determination will not pass for 'A'. Similar condition can be used for other values of trigger.
2) Create a separate receiver system / service for each interface A, B etc. Then you can use the enhanced Receiver Determination feature in the IR itself if you are on SP16. Check this:
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
Good luck,
Bhanu

Receiver determination based on target msg???

Hi All,
Is it possible to do a receiver determination based on some field present in target msg. I know I can do the same if the field is present in source msg with the condition editor in receiver determination. But this will not help my scenario. I need to find the receiver based on a field in target msg. Is it possible?? If so, can u pls explain it???
Thanks & Regards,
Jai Shankar.

Jai,
Am on Sp14 and have not had the chance to try it out.
but, <b>I dont think you will need a extra Receiver Determination for the Enhanced Receiver Determination.</b>
What I understood out of that blog was that the Interface mapping between Source Interface and Receiver Interface will determine the receiver. So, you fill in the reciver service field with the actual receiver and this value will be taken as the receiver.
The Receiver Interface will be taken from the SAP basis SWCV.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
Regards,
Bhavesh
Regards,
Bhavesh

M7301 VALUE OF THIS GOOD MOVEMENT IS NEGATIVE

Hi Gurus,
While doing the GR ( via IDOC ) against the PO getting an error VALUE OF THIS GOOD MOVEMENT IS NEGATIVE. The process is below
PO Created with more than 300 Items and 12 items was deleted. The PO is not GR based invoice veritifcation,
IR has been done for the items.
We are using inbound delivery to update the Purchase order. Later based on the Inbound delivery GR need to done.
Not manual GR, 3 PL sends the file and in SAP it updates the GR against the inbound delivery.
While doing GR we are facing the Error M701 VALUE OF THIS GOOD MOVEMENT IS NEGATIVE
I checked all of the aspects likeOSS note 773515 we are using 4.7 version.
Regards,
Yuva

What is the Movement type you are using?

Value of the good movements is in negative

I'm trying to do a reversal for the returns with the movement type 162, but i'm not able to post the reversal and i'm getting the error that the Value of the goods movement is in negative

1. Case A:
              There are two goods receipts with different values. This situation occurs when the order price between the two goods receipts was changed. The system valuates the return delivery or the reversal with the average value of goods received.
              Example: 100 pieces of a material are ordered at 10 DEM per piece.
1. Goods receipt: 10 pieces at 100 DEM
Price change in the purchase order: Order price now 12 DEM per piece.
2. Goods receipt: 10 pieces at 120 DEM, so that a total of 20 pieces was posted with DEM 220.
Return delivery (or reversal) of 10 pieces is now valuated with the proportional value of goods received of 10 pieces * 220 / 20 pieces = 110 DEM.
4. Case D:
              An order price unit (OPUn) (different to the order unit (OUn)) was defined in the purchase order. The relationship between quantity in OUn and quantity in OPUn is different in the (sum of all) goods receipts to that in the (sum of all) invoices.
              Example:         100 pieces of a material are ordered at 1 DEM per kg.
                  1 piece (OUn) correspond to 10 kg (OPUn)
Invoice:         100 pieces with 1000 kg at 1000 DEM
Goods receipt:    90 pieces with 950 kg at 950 DEM
Goods receipt:    10 pieces with 100 kg at 100 DEM
Return delivery: 10 pieces with 105 kg at 105 DEM
              The difference of 5 DEM in the valuation of the return delivery (or reversal) is a result of the system determining the returned quantity in OPUn - as long as the user has not entered anything different - with the portion of the returned quantity in OUn (10 pieces from 100 pieces, since in OPUn 105 kg from 1050 kg), and valuating with the proportional value delivered to date.

Material determination during goods movement

Hi Guys,
I am using the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create goods movement. And I want to check the material availability and execute the material determination based on atp check results also. Does this BAPI implicitly handles material determination based on ATP? OR should I write the logic to the material determination explicitly before calling this BAPI?
Regards,
Rahul

As Jurgen has mentioned, material substitution is a part of SD and has to achieved prior to the goods movement BAPI.
Have a look at FMs for the material substitution logic:
RV_MAT_SUB_SAVE
RV_KONDITION_SICHERN
RV_KONDITION_SICHERN_V13A
is there any BAPI or Function Module for Materi... | SCN

How ETT is picking based on movement type

Hi all
Please tell how Excise Trasction Type (ETT) is picked based on movement type?
Also for Retrun delivery to vendor (mvmt type: 122) ETT picking is OTHR, if i want to make it to pick OTHR Sub trasaction type 10 how should i want to do it?
Regards
K.R.Srinivasan

Hi,
First of all ETTs are not picked up as per movement types. These are defined in SAP Standard program to be picked for different transactions.
For e.g. GRPO for Goods Receipt against PO, DLFC for Outgoing Excise Invoice, OTHR for J1IS, etc....
And it will not pick up the Subtransaction type 10 automatically during J1IS (or any transaction), you have to specify this manually during J1IS.
For this you have to do necessary Account Determination for ETTs, Excise group and Subtransaction type 10
Check in SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Account Determination > Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
And in SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Account Determination > Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction

Second highest and third lowest value in columns

create table test (id number,a number,b number,c number,d number,e number);
insert into test values (1,13,8,7,14,15);
Required output with column names 2nd highest and 3rd Lowest Value
ID           2NDHIGHEST        3RDLOWEST
1            14[D]             13[A]Thanks.

So because you didn't quite get the answer you wanted before you thought you'd just ask the same question again?
That just confuses people as they don't know what solutions you've already been provided with.
So what you want is something like...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 with test as (
2                select 1 as id,20 as a,23 as b,38 as c,15 as d, 13 as e from dual union all
3                select 2, 0, 18, 18.1, 19, 7 from dual union all
4                select 3,40,-2,25.67,28,17 from dual union all
5                select 4,13,8,7,14,15 from dual
6               )
7 --
8 -- end of test data
9 --
10 select id
11         -- take the results and pivot them back to single rows
12        ,max(case when rnk = cnt_rnk-1 then to_char(n)||' ['||l||']' else null end) as second_highest
13        ,max(case when rnk = 3 then to_char(n)||' ['||l||']' else null end) as third_lowest
14 from (-- determine the maximum rank value within each id group
15        select id, l, n, rnk
16              ,max(rnk) over (partition by id) as cnt_rnk
17        from (-- determine ranks for the 'n' values within each id group
18              select id, l, n
19                    ,dense_rank() over (partition by id order by n) as rnk
20              from (-- unpivot the data to make the structure workable
21                    select id
22                          ,decode(rn,1,'a',2,'b',3,'c',4,'d',5,'e') as l
23                          ,decode(rn,1,a,2,b,3,c,4,d,5,e) as n
24                    from test
25                         cross join (select rownum rn from dual connect by rownum <= 5)
26                   )
27             )
28       )
29 where rnk = 3
30 or    rnk = cnt_rnk-1
31 group by id
32* order by id
SQL> /
        ID SECOND_HIGHEST                               THIRD_LOWEST
         1 23 20 [a]
2 18.1 [c] 18 [b]
3 28 [d] 25.67 [c]
4 14 [d] 13 [a]

BO XI Desk-I graph The negative values are rising form the lowest value up

The negative values are rising form the lowest value up. Instead of dropping from the Zero-line. Where is the problem originating? BO FP2.3.
The positives values are also rising from the lowest value up.
The problem only occurs withing Desk-I. Within Web-I this problem does not occur.
Edited by: A. SMULDERS on Sep 7, 2010 10:35 AM

Hi
Try with the following symbol in the field
&ITAB-NETWR(>)& - will write the sign as (100.00-)
&ITAB-NETWR(<)& - will write the sign as (-100.00)
and based on some field in the program write like
If itab-shkzg = 'H'.
itab-netwr = itab-netwe * -1.
endif.
and try to print this field in the form.
<b>Reward points for useful Answers</b>
Regards
Anji

Lowest value determination based on movement rate

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for