Lowest value determination including delivery costs

Hi friends,
is it possible to include delivery costs (as freight costs FRA1 and FRB1) in the lowest value determination MRN0 when comparing order prices as market prices?
Best regards,
Carsten

HI,
I have done this configuration to go to different GL Account
Example --for Freight(Seperate GL Account)
My requirement is
In PO
Material X       100/-    Cost centre-1024
Material Y       200/-    Cost Centre-1025
Invoice is
Material X       100/-   
Material Y       200/-  
Unplanned Delivery costs 30/-
After Posting MIRO it should come this way...
Material X       100/-   CC-1024
Material Y       200/-   CC-1025
Freight -charges- 10/- CC 1024
Freight -charges-20/-  CC-1025
(Freight charges should go to different GL Account and also splitting the costs based on the PO item value)
could you please help me how this can be done.

Similar Messages

  • Limiting value for unplanned delivery cost

    Hi,
    I want to set up a limiting value for unplanned delivery cost ( Say the unplanned delivery cost should not exceed 10% of the total invoice value ).
    How to achieve this functionality.
    Regards,
    R. Dillibabu.

    Hello,
    There are no checks for unplanned delivery cost and you should explore the possibility of user exits to implement this functionality.
    Cheers !

  • Lowest value determination based on movement rate

    Dear Experts,
    in lowest value determination,what are
    1. based on range coverage(mrn1)
    2. based on movement rate (mrn2)
    formula for this is : total recipts / qty in stock * 100 = say is 10%
    if less than 15% then that deval % is applied(deval % is specified in Config).
    now where do we specify this 15 %
    Kind Regards
    Sajid

    Any Answers Please!!!!!!!!

  • Lowest value determination

    Dear Experts,
    in lowest value determination,what are
    based on range coverage(mrn1)
    based on movement rate (mrn2)
    formula for this is : total recipts / qty in stock * 100 = say is 10%
    if less than 15% then that deval % is applied(deval % is specified in Config).
    now where do we specify this 15 %
    Pls give solution.
    Kind Regards
    Sajid

    Hi
    Is it the exception rule you are checking in MRN1 - exception rules - %?
    Thanks

  • Unplanned delivery cost picking rounding off value in sap miro

    Dear Experts,
    I have configured unplanned delivery costs to be posted to separate GL account. I have set the default tax code also. In OBYC i have set the frieght and transportation GL account against UPF transaction key. Now even though the user is not entering any value in unplanned delivery cost field, system  is automatically taking the rounding off values(manually entered by user to match the vendor invoice) from MIRO line item and is posting to the freight account.
    Query -2 - while reversing the already posted MIRO document in MR8M the rounding of value  which has been taken automatically in unplanned delivery cost is showing in the error message as :
    "Balance is not equal to zero: 0.35- inr"
    please refer below screen shot for the error message
    Please suggest.
    Regards
    Chinmaya

    please read my blog it explains how to close a question, just replying "closed" does not do really this job
    How to close a discussion and why

  • GR Value without Delivery costs

    Hi experts,
    We loaded data through 2lis_02_Scl into the standard cube 0pur_c01.
    Through some update routine in the update rules the data loaded into the cube for the field " Value of
    goods received in local currency ".
    When checked in the cube we are getting the value with the "Delivery Costs".
    But we want the value without Delivery Costs.
    The update routine in the update rules for this field is as follows:
    ========================
    IF ( COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '002' or     "WE-Wert
        COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '012' or
        COMM_STRUCTURE-PROCESSKEY = '022' )
        AND COMM_STRUCTURE-BWAPPLNM EQ 'MM'
        AND COMM_STRUCTURE-CPPVLC <> 0.
        RESULT = COMM_STRUCTURE-CPPVLC.
    ========================
    How to get the value without delivery costs ? What the code i need to write for this ?
    Regards,
    Bhadri M.

    Please ask your functional consultant,
    about the condition to differentiate the GR Value and the Delivery Costs the Source System.
    Check the movement types or the conditions.
    Identify the tables and the field names.
    ensure those fields were being populated through our extractor, if not go ahead with enhancing the structure and make a look up on the tables. After populating in the DSO, write a routine to negate the delivery costs.

  • Planned delivery cost in Import of Assets Materail

    Hi,
    I have a scenario, where we are purchasing (Import) Assets material from abroad. for this we have created Import PO with account assignment A. assigned the planned delivery cost in Condition Viz. Sea freight, Custom Duty, CHA charges and individual vendor also assigned at condition level.
    We have posted the MIRO for Custome Duty and Done the GR. Excise Invoice also Captured and posted. While posting the invoice of other Delivery cost after GR system is not showing any value in MIRO line item.
    Where as in normal inport cycle Value in Planned delivery cost IV (after GR) is appearing itself.
    Please guide how to Post Delievry cost IV in above scenario. we donot want to enter any amount manual in MIRO line item.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Ranjan Kumar

    Hi Ranjan,
    The idea with MIRO is to enter the vendor invoice that you got on paper, i.e. the gross amount, the tax amount(s) and the net item amounts - all from the vendor invoice. For this reason the defaulted amounts shouldn't be necessary.
    If your business case is different, then there's a workaround. MIRO only suggests amounts if two cases:
    - PO doesn't have provision for GR ("GR" flag on the tab "Delivery") or
    - PO does have provision for GR and the received qty up to day is higher than the total invoiced qty up to day.
    I have however used a user exit to make MIRO think the GR flag in the PO is not set. The user exit is the enhancement point MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE_01 of the enh. spot ES_SAPLMRMC located right in the beginning  of the function MRM_AMOUNT_QUANTITY_PROPOSE. The function module receives the GR flag from the PO in the parameter I_MRM_PROP-WEPOS. Let your enhancement reset the flag and make MIRO believe the GR flag in the PO is not set. Then it will propose the PO qty and amount.
    However, let me underline again - the idea with MIRO is that you should type in the invoice that you hold your hand.
    BR
    Raf

  • Delivery Costs Entries(BEWTP = F/G/I/M) related to PO in EKBE

    Hello..
    I am new to MM and i have been checking the values of BEWTP field in EKBE.
    I could see the following values related to Delivery Costs.
    BEWTP = F / G / I / M
    Can any one tell me what does each stands for and How can i get an entry in EKBE for each of the above type?
    any help/input is really appreciated.
    Thanks,
    lt

    Hi,
       The description for the PO history category can be found from table T163B.
       The delivery cost related PO history will be updated in EKBZ table, not in EKBE.
       The PO history category depends on the condition category used against the delivery cost condition type.
    1. If the condition category is B (Delivery Cost)  for the delivery cost condition type (in M/06), then the delivery cost history will be updated as below:
    During GR (EKBZ-VGABE =1),, EKBZ - BEWTP = F
    During IR (EKBZ-VGABE =2),  EKBZ - BEWTP = M and or EKBZ - BWTYP = K , if its account assigned PO.
    2. If the condition category is blank or F (Delivery Cost) for the delivery cost condition type (in M/06), then the delivery cost history will be updated as below:
    During GR (EKBZ-VGABE =1), EKBZ - BEWTP = C
    During IR (EKBZ-VGABE =2),  no entry in EKBZ
    Regards,
    AKPT

  • Purchase Order Delivery Cost

    Hi all,
    when i created PO and enter  freight value,at the point of entering migo an error message "Balance not zero: 99,749.85- debit: 34,197,149.85 credit: 34,296,899.70"
    was displayed ,Please how can i resolve this issue.

    Hi
    when i created PO and enter freight value,at the point of entering migo an error message
    can explain in which tab you enter fright value?  befor posting migo ,how you simulte it
    I think its Miro trasnction,If you value is plant delivery cost then choose deliver+plant delivery cost in miro layout
    or Its unplanned then enter in details tab in unplanned field
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Query-Unplanned delivery cost

    Dear All,
    This is regarding Unplanned delivery Cost:
    I make an PO of a Material of 15000 Qty in which PO Value  is calculated excluding Freight charges   .
    But while doing GRN I comes to Know the Freight charges. Let us say 500 Rs but this is for 10000 Quantity (Here the vendor is different (Transporter)).whereas 5000 Qty will come later on.
    So i have configured that during GRN Vendor can be changed. or for this USer will Go into Change PO mode and will put the freight charges as 500
    But this freight charges is distributed on 15000 quantity whereas actually i want that this freight charges can be uploaded on 10000 Quantity.
    How it can be handled ?
    Whereas when next time when i receive remaining (5000 Quantity) at that time freight is 200 Rs (For eg)
    How it will be uploaded on 5000 quantity.
    Can it be possible that i ask the user to put 1 Rs as nominal value in FRB1 for (transporter as Vendor)
    And after doing MIGO  out of this 1 Rs proportanately distribute this value on 10000 qty  (lets say 0.75 Rs )
    And while doing MIRO I select the PO no and Planned deliver cost where in it will show quantity as
    10000 and freight value as 0.75 (Here i will put the actual Freight)  But in this case if i put the actual freight it gets uploaded on Freight G/L.
    Is it possible that the freight gets uploaded on Items which i am purchasing?
    If i dont put the actual value instead of 0.75 and instead of that can i put this value in Unplanned delivery cost. But i think if i put the Unplanned delivery cost as 500 Rs ,system is showing me only the Credit amount of Rs 500 on Vendor and on freight acct as 0.75 
    i.e   Transporter is getting credited by 500 Rs
    and only Freight acct is getting debited by 0.75
    balance 499.25 Rs it is not showing at all.
    CAN U PLZ GUIDE ME ON THIS ????
    REgards
    Shailesh

    Hi,
    Why dont u put the charges directly in MIRO rather than modifying the PO. This way u can distribute ur charges as per quantity
    Thanks,
    Sourabh

  • TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

    Dear All,
    I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
    We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
    Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
    The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
    What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
    I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
    Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
    How to achive this, pl help.
    Regards,
    Nagaraj S

    hi
    the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
    now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
    can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
    also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
    here what value u have maintained  ,we are using 2 as (2     Different G/L line)
    regards
    kunal
    Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

  • Planned delivery cost difference

    dear experts,
    during doing MIRO for planned delivery cost. In case the real value for the delivery cost is different than the one in the PO, what is the standard way to handle this?????

    Hi HS...
    I think your case is when you dont know the actual del costs during PO or MIGO so the differences are due to the actual costs incurred at the time of MIRO entry.
    You can maintain a unit price for the PL del cost condition types and do the MIGO. At the time of MIRO you can enter actual planned del costs (if the costs aren't adding up to the material cost then you have clean posting, if they are adding, then it will distribute the costs on the available stocks, and if they differ from the PO qty then postings are done accordingly, if the qty is zero then it will go to PRD)
    Regards
    Shiva

  • Conditions type of category "Delivery Costs"(B) donu00B4t allow negative values

    Hello,
    I would like to know if it is possible to munipulate a condition type with category "B" Delivery costs in such a way that it allows a negative entry in the Purchase Order.
    Estandard SAP does not allow it. Message: 06259 "Negative Delivery costs are not allowed".
    If the above is not possible, can anyone tell me how a can manipulate a Discount (fixed amount) in such a way that it not only points at a particlar account (accruels indicator does this job) upon MIGO, but also apears as a line-item upon receiving the invoice (MIRO). As far as I know, only Planned delivery costs can do this job. But they do not allow negative values!
    If anyone has encountered a similar task, please tell me how they solved it.
    Thanks,
    Aart

    Hello Guys,
    The scenario isas follows.
    When one buys fuel, in Chile  one has to pay fuel especific Taxes.
    Version especific config does not resolve this because we need the tax in amount (value) not in percentage.
    In our system we resolved this by creating a material "Fuel especific Taxes" which points at a tax-account  with a special tax-indicator.
    So far so good.
    Now the government implemented a second fuel tax - "Fuel tax variable" which we might resolve in the same way, but the problem is this tax might be negative(!).
    We cannot create a material with a "negative value" in our Purchase Order and discount conditions have inmediate efect on the material costs in the PO.
    The ideal would be incorporate a condition type in the PO which upon invoicing (MIRO) shows up with the tax account (and a possible negative value!
    The model we have developed upto now is using the tabpage "GeneralAccount" in the MIRO but in this model we have to indicate the account ourselves. The system does not propose it.
    Thats why I thought of the "Planned Delivery costs" option.
    Hope this clarifies a bit more the case we have.
    Thanks for any feedback
    Aart

  • Unplanned delivery cost will lead to negative value

    Hi everyone,
    i have this issue.  I m trying to cancel an incoice document from MR8M.When i do that i get a message: No m8281, unplanned delivery cost will lead to negative value.
    Can someone help me with this? what do i need to do?
    Regards

    Hi,
    This problem is caused by a program error.
    Refer the notes 1377622, 992146
    You use transaction MIRO "Enter Incoming Invoice" to enter an invoice that has a reference to a purchase order. Based on your Customizing settings, the unplanned delivery costs are distributed to the individual items.
    1. You enter negative unplanned delivery costs on the "Details" tab page. The negative unplanned delivery costs lead to a negative invoice amount.
                  The system does not issue error message M8 281 "Unplanned delivery costs will lead to negative value".
                  Negative invoice values (EKBE-WRBTR, EKBE-DMBTR) are written in the purchase order history. This results in an error in transaction MCE7 "Material Analysis (PURCHIS): Selection".
    2. You post a subsequent credit. You enter unplanned delivery costs on the "Details" tab page. The unplanned delivery costs lead to a negative total invoice amount.
                  The system does not issue error message M8 281 "Unplanned delivery costs will lead to negative value".
                  The negative total invoice amount (the total of EKBE-WRBTR or EKBE-DMBTR) leads to an unexpected distribution of unplanned delivery costs for the next invoice document.
    (SAP Customizing Implementation Guide -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Incoming Invoice -> Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted)
    Other terms
    Negative, delivery costs (DLC), bnkan_fw, rewwr, M8 281, rewrt
    Reason and Prerequisites
    This problem is caused by a program error.
    Solution
    The Support Package for Releases 4.70, 5.00, 6.00, 6.02, 6.03 and 6.04 corrects this error.
    Advance correction: implement the correction instructions.
    Header Data

  • Unplanned Delivery Costs and Price Variance - Account Determination

    Hi,
    I am facing the following issue:
    My goal is to automatic post the unplanned delivery costs to an account depending on valuation class.
    The account should be diferent from the one used in purchase (EIN)  post but both values should affect the moving price.
    Can we do that?
    Thank you for your cooperation
                   Best Regards
                     João Fernandes

    My take is that you can have or the other, not both.
    You configure how the uplanned costs are handled, a) Distributed among invoice Items or b) to a different G/L line.
    Path : SPRO>MM>LIV>Incoming Invoice
    If you pick, the costs goes to the stock account.
    If you pick B, the cost goes to a separate account but it will not affect the item price.
    The account is defined in OBYC, for transaction UPF, and it is Valuation class independent.
    Hope it  helps

Maybe you are looking for