LR Beta & ACR

I know that there will be a new ACR when LR is released to make them compatible. But, will that also make ACR compatible with existing images that have been adjusted in the Beta version?

Yes and no. After you upgrade the Library (which backs up the old library BTW), you'll need to export the XMP data, which will be a sidecar file for RAW files and embedded in others, including DNG. Then it will be compatible.

Similar Messages

  • Uninstall ACR 8.6 Beta?

    How Do I uninstall ACR 8.6 Beta from Photoshop CS6 to add final ACR 8.6?

    The official way to uninstall ACR is to uninstall Photoshop or whatever Adobe product ACR came with.
    If you have not been offered the non-beta ACR since the first of August when it was first available then there is something wrong with what is tracking the versions of things and an uninstaller would not necessarily help with that.   I mean, even if there was an uninstaller, you might uninstall ACR 8.6 RC and still not be offered any update and be stuck without any ACR.  So the ultimate solution is to reset things enough that the Adobe version database and processes to make everything work like it should, again.  I’m not sure exactly how to do this.  On way is to uninstall all Adobe products then run the CC Cleaner and then reinstall all Adobe products.
    Without fixing the underlying issue, it might also should work to use the manual installers you can download from an Adobe HELPX page with direct links:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/camera-raw-plug-in-installer.html

  • ACR 4.6 and Elements 5 for D90?

    Hi,
    I have downloaded the beta ACR 4.6 and copied the Camera Raw.8bi file to:
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Photoshop Elements 5.0\Plug-Ins\File Formats\
    It is correctly installed as when I open Nikon D40 .NEF files already in the Organiser it opens ACR4.6. However when I try and import Nikon D90 .NEF files I receive an error message saying the files are corrupt/not a supported format and therefore cannot be imported into the Organiser.
    Am I doing something wrong or is there a workaround?
    Thanks,

    Hi Jeff,
    Yes I use a card reader. It's not an issue with reading the card as I'm currently shooting the D90 as RAW+Fine JPEG. When I launch Elements Photo Downloader it shows me the NEF files + the JPEGS but only the thumbprint image for the JPEGs (The NEF files all have the same icon). It allow me to select both the NEFs + JPEGs for loading into the organiser but then fails to load the NEFs, saying the file is unrecognised or damaged.
    I can however open the NEFs from ACR4.6 within the Elements 5 editor. I'm assuming therefore that ACR 4.6/the editor are fine working with D90 NEFs but the 'Photo Downloader' part of Elements isn't.
    Any further thoughts?
    Cheers,
    Rob

  • Where is my Profiles in ACR 6.1?

    I just download the new (beta) ACR 6.1, and I could not find my previously created lens profiles. I put the .lcp files to the "c:\Documents and Settings\(my user  name)\Application Data\Adobe\CameraRaw\LensProfiles\1.0\" directory, as mentioned in the Lens Profile Creator App. (It is work within PS Lens Correction Panel.) Is any wrong in my setup? Yes I know the ACR settings have an Lens Correction Tab, but it not show my lenses only the standards/defaults.
    -best-
    TS

    Are you processing raw files or JPEG files in CR 6.1? There are separate profiles for each.
    I'm guessing you made JPEG profiles and now you're processing a raw file. You cannot apply a JPEG lens profile to a raw file, or vice versa.

  • 6.4 beta goes AWOL

    Beta ACR converter 6.4 installs and functions until the following day when the new beta disappears and the prior ACR converter appears and won't open files defined in 6.4 but not in prior editions.

    Not sure how that would happen.  Did you do a System Restore or install Photoshop or Premier or Elements?  Have you tried downloading and installing the update, again, from http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates/

  • Not opening multiple RAW files

    If i open a Raw file in Bridge, it opens up perfectly. Also my jpegs and tiff open in RAW, so no problem there. The problem is, that I cannot open multiple Raw files from Bridge into Raw with the option "open in Camera Raw" So the shortcut cmd+R ( I am on a mac) does not work. It says that Raw has to be opened at least once. I have been using Raw for years now so it has been opened multiple times.
    I Can not seem to find a solution. I would really like to open up multiple edited Raw files at once, and in Raw give the order to rename them into JPEG. If you do that, you see Photoshop CC and a window that says how many convertions are left. So far so good...  but before, I was able to open up some new raw files in Camera Raw without having to wait for Photoshop to convert everything. Now I have to wait for a long time before I can make my new Edits. Can somebody please help me?
    I am using all updated software.
    Ben

    Hello SSPRENGEL,
    Thank you very much for your reply. My apologies for the mess up with RAW and ACR naming.
    The situation is, that I can not open any file with CMd-R. I can open single files with CMD-O. But I need to open multiple files at ones with CMD-R. It used to work good.
    The problem is, That I am in the business of school photography. I take the pictures as RAW files on an Nikon camera (nef) After I ajust all the pictures, I have to rename all of them to JPEG, just to get them online.
    I used to do that with ACR. But now the problem is, if I open a lot of picures with CMD-O, It opens up very good in ACR and I still can give the command to save all of these as JPEG. It workt great, but I have to wait a looooooong time before I can open up my next batch of pictures and start to adjust those. Normally, it would save the files as JPEG and I was able to open up a new batch of pictures in ACR right away. That saves me A LOT OF TIME. This only works if you can open the files with CMS-R. Strange...
    I updated my I-mac to 10.9.1 so I see that is not the newest. PS-CC is 14-2-1 x64 and I am using the beta ACR for now (8.4)
    I just tried to open a RAW file in photoshop with the normal open command and it lauches ACR perfectly. But again from within Adobe bridge I still get the same error about needing to open a qualifying product at least once.
    Stange isn't it?
    Thank you very much for your time!
    Ben

  • Pdf slideshow from PS CS4 - not bridge/output!

    Does anyone know if I can get it back in the automate settings, perhaps as a legacy function?
    I've just downloaded the PS CS4 and LR2 trials (and using the beta LR2.2 and beta ACR) as my PS CS2 and old raw plugin don't open my new cameras images.
    imho I don't think they've really thought it through from a workflow pov, I provide both contacts and a pdf slideshow to my clients. If I use the bridge/output method for both on every job - and all the swapping over of the options that entails I will be smacking my head off the nearest wall after a couple of days.
    The bridge/output also limits my choices severely - I thought the idea of upgrading was to IMPROVE functionality......... I'm not usually a grumbler, but I'm about to pay an upgrade price of nearly a grand (in £'s - not $!) essentially for a lovely raw plugin and nice LR2 web galleries - it's not looking like a particularly good deal :-(
    I've found the "PS CS4 goodie" folder on the adobe site and installed the contact sheet II option into the automate area - it's just not practical for me to have a set of contacts in pdf format, it's definitely a step backwards for me.
    I'd hoped for an improvement, with options to include a title, date etc - but nope.
    I'm also not happy with the pdf slideshow in bridge/output - I miss the compression options, I often need to keep them small on the file front - whilst keeping the screen looking good (150ppi compression works well) - which I don't have the ability to do this in cs4, constraining to screen size choices with a "high" or "low" option is useless to me. I just don't get it - this is pro software - with a pro price - is it too much to ask for more pro workflow considerations? Come on Adobe, play the game......
    Apologies for the rambling rant and general grumpiness - all help & suggestions very much appreciated :-)

    I found an answer to my own question. A work around of sorts.
    Download Photoshop Elements 6 for Macintosh. With PSE6 I made a slide show with 550 images 1920x1200, without thumbs. I ran into one problem making the slide show. My images contained 4 images which had not ben created by Photoshop and could not be included in the slide show. Opening the images in Photoshop CS4 and re-saving them still did not make then acceptable. Not a big deal. I probably could have fixed the four images by stripping all EXIF data before opening them in Photoshop. BTW, PSE6 made the slide show in demo mode.
    I hope the bug in Photoshop CS4 will be fixed in Photoshop CS5.

  • Nikon Coolpix P340 Camera RAW plug in for Adobe Bridge?

    Just got a P340 specifically for the ability to capture RAW images and realized that the camera isn't supported yet. Anyone know when the plug in for the P340 will be available?

    Thanks for trying to help, Curt Y.  I did download the beta ACR 8.4.0.182 and have CC.  I checked that it was installed.  I redownloaded the images from the camera.  After I did that, the NEF files in RAW showed up in Bridge but no thumbnails.  When I tried to open them I got the same error message that these can't be opened.  I researched the beta ACR 8.4 newly suported cameras and the Coolpix P340 was not listed.
    I tried taking the memmory card out of the P340 and put it into my Nikon D7000 to see if I could download the files in RAW as the D7000 is supported, but for some reason the files did not even appear on the D7000.  I guess P340 files won't be able to be viewed or otherwise utilized in a D7000 camera.
    Unless you have any other suggestions, I guess I need to wait until Adobe adds the P340 to the list of supported cameras.
    Best/Saul

  • In Lense Correction the Fujifilm X-T1 is not recognised ,only the Fujifilm x100 is listed

    The Adobe rubric says that it recognizes the Fujifilm X-T1, but in Lens Ccorrection it does not list the X-T1, the only Fujifilm camera listed is the X100. As a result I cannot fully adjust my pictures to the X-T1 and its lenses

    Wait!  It is so new I do not see it on list.  Keep checking beta ACR 8.4 to see when it is added.

  • Uninstalling Camera Raw 8.4 RC CC

       Can soemone please tell me the necessary steps to remove Camera Raw 8.4 RC for Photoshop CC completely so that I can restore Photoshop back to using Camera Raw 8.3. I use MacOSX 10.92 .
    Thanks
    Trevor Craig

    I think the official process to go back to the previous non-beta ACR would be to uninstall PS-CC and any other Adobe app that uses ACR, then reinstall those and reupdate them to the current ACR version using the Updates process from within the apps.
    You could try installing ACR 8.3 from one of the direct links on this page, but I don't know if it'll let you downgrade versions that way:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/crawlspace/2011/03/keeping-photoshop-up-to-date.html#notconnected
    If you can find the Camera Raw.plugin file on your computer associated wtih PS-CC then there might also be a way to extract and rename the large resource file from the DMG at the above link and copy it over the top of your current Camera Raw plug-in file.  I have done this on a PC but don't know what the specific file names and paths are on a Mac to be more specific.

  • Raw files to cs6

    I installed cs6 and it won''t read raw files from my nikon d800.  what do I need to install and how

    You need to upgrade the Adobe Camera Raw plugin to at least version 7.1.  There is also an improved although still in public beta ACR 7.2 RC1.
    (At least one published tutorial out there shows the inner circle is already working with an ACR 7.3 beta.  )

  • Camera calibration panel

    I am running LR2.1,PS3 and ACR 4.5 on Win Vista. Current in the Camera Calibration panel under Profiles only Acr 4.4 and 4.2 show up.
    Any ideas how to get my latest ACR version to show up?
    TIA,
    Jim

    >Or is it a clash between two betas, ACR 4.6 and Camera Profiles? I'll try some of the D70 NEFs tonight....
    There are profiles in the package for the D70 and D70s and they should work really well. With my old D50 (same sensor as the D70)
    I get far better results with the camera matching profiles than with the Adobe standard profiles. The D90 is newer (very few people yet have it in the US) than the profiles and I am sure profiles will be added in the next go around.

  • Lightroom 4 and Nikon D800

    I am using Mac with Lion, Lightroom 4 and 6.7 beta ACR. I am converting  to DNG on import and none of my vertical shots are not automatically rotating to the correct orientation. Just wondering if anyone else is having the same problem?
    Thanks
    Chad

    Don't know about your camera, but on the D90 there is a menu option that has to be set in order to rotate tall.  Have you set that option?

  • Adobe Releases DNG SDK

    Adobe just released an SDK for the DNG format. What does this mean fro better DNG support in Aperture if anything? Are we to assume that Apple hasn't had access to this before now? I'm hoping what this means is that in the future we'll have better support for DNG which means it will support virtually any RAW format. Does anyone know, if Apple didn't have access to this before how long this might take to get working? Is it a matter of a couple months, or would we have to wait until 2.0?
    http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/04/18/sdk/index.php?lsrc=mwrss

    Well, first off, dcraw produces pretty remarkable
    conversions. Perhaps that's why so many products out
    there (including ACR) use the code as part of their
    converter.
    No argument that the output is decent, but I tend to think the adoption of DCRaw is because it is (a) Free (as in beer or speech), and (b) way easier than doing it yourself from scratch. Did I mention it was free?
    I mean, lets say you are writing "Bob's RAW Readin' App". What else are you really going to use? If you're running on OSX you could rely on the OS conversion but many of these apps want to support windows as well. DCRaw is just sitting there, quite free for the taking, and the "Readin'" part of that app is done. Now that Apple's conversions are better that idea may take root a little more than it has in the past.
    I honestly don't know that there is even another library around, commercial or not, that does what DCRaw can do.
    Secondly, it's rather spurious reasoning to assume
    that Apple is only capable of producing broken
    renderers (though, I'll admit that between
    image-quality problems in 1.0 and performance
    problems in 1.1 I don't have a lot of confidence) -
    and it's absurd to keep adding support for
    oddball/exotic cameras while ignoring DNG.
    Here's the problem though. In order to support something like the Fuji, they are going to have to be able to parse that offset image sensor data (rotated 45 degrees) wether or not it comes from a Fuji RAW or a DNG converted from a Fuji. Thanks to DCRaw we all know right where that RAW data is held, so it's not a problem to reach it even without assitance from Fuji. The trick is producing a decent conversion. Even now there's a thread in the Lightroom forums complaining about the Fuji S2 conversion being not that great:
    http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?catid=589&thre adid=1125459&enterthread=y
    and I'll bet ACR has put more thought into Fuji RAW than even DCRaw has so far! Is it not fair to say that if Aperture had the same problems with conversions we'd have a hue and cry across the land? Far better to say you can't do something and have people know not to buy the product, than to lead people into thinking you can do something when some people are going to be very dissapointed in your "support". Even now I feel Aperture should simly remove "DNG" from the list of supported formats, because it does not meet what I consider to be the absolute minimum for that format - DNG Linear.
    I actually partly agree with you in that I think they should add DNG Linear support first, which would placate a lot of people and be super easy to add since there is only one form of DNG Linear. Then they can finish support for the more offbeat formats.
    As for why to use DNG - it's simple - there are a LOT
    of cameras out there that are not supported
    otherwise, and there always will be. It's wonderful
    to have a simple, compatible format.
    Except that every true variant of a Bayer array (Canon and Nikon are not variants that differ significantly in this regard) requires different processing techniques. The Fuji 45 degree rotation is replicated exactly (well, as exactly as it can be) in that DNG file and requires different techiniques to work with and get a good conversion. I shudder to think how the SuperCCD SR data from the S3 is represented in a DNG file since it has two sensors at each pixel - I suspect it is probably stored as a linear DNG file (in short it demosiacs the RAW data before storage and does not really hold the raw data [unprooved speculation]).
    It's bizarre that you'd advocate for not supporting
    this, it could only be a good thing.
    It would be an awesome thing if it really worked. When I first read about DNG I was very, very excited! It was only after I read the specs and realized you still would need a different conversions algorithm for any of the numberless variants of RAW data that DNG is capible of holding that my joy turned to anguish.
    The reality on the ground is that pretty much all cameras that do not have bog-standard bayer CFA grids will be shunt off to the Island of Misfit Cameras if DNG were really to take hold, because most programs would really only bother to include conversion algorithms for the most popular kinds of formats held in DNG. I dearly love the Fujis and Sigmas and Sonys (cyan color in grid) of the world and want to see alternate choices flourish.
    The problem is not exactly with DNG so much as that what DNG is trying to do (pretend to normalize all sensor data as if it were the same) is simply not possible, and in my mind not even desireable because, as I said, I want to keep sensor diversity alive and alternate sensor designs coming down the pipe.

  • ACR 7.1 Beta & Photoshop CS6 Lens Profiles

    If I open a Nikon RAW (NEF) file in ACR 7.1 Beta it correctly finds my Camera and Lens Combination Nikon D3 with the Nikon 24-70m f2,8 with the Adobe Lens Profile. However, when I leave ACR and the image is open in Photoshop, go to Filter, Lens Correction it does not automatically detect the correct camera and lens combination.
    It shows the Camera Make as NIKON CORPORATION, but the Camera Model and Lens Model are not detected and I am asked to choose. In the Lens Profiles I see two choices, one for a Nikon D3x with the correct lens, the other for a generic Nikon Camera with a Sigma 24-70 F2.8.
    I would have thought the detection process would have been the same?
    MK

    I was just curious and hunting around ACR 7.1 and Photoshop trying our the features. Also I have found that LR4 RC2 has follows ACR 7.1 as far as lens profiles go working with RAW images, so there is some consistency.
    Wonder what the difference is between a RAW rendered image in ACR versus a Photoshop rendered image. Given, I could be wrong here, that Lens Correction is based on the optics of the lens, focal length, and the characteristics of the sensor, so would they not be the same in ACR and Photoshop? 
    I think I need to go check out a lens profiler
    Cheers
    Mike
    There is one reason that I may go back into the Lens Correction Filter and that might be to fine tune some of the persective tools. With a large panorama much easier to see what needs to be done rather than view seperate images, and i have done that in the past. did not come to me until after I had hit the Send Button

Maybe you are looking for