LR2 and Camera Matching Profiles

I downloaded and installed the beta camera profiles but they don't appear in LR2. The profile pull down in Camera calibration only has ACR 4.4, ACR 3.3, Adobe Standard beta 1, D2x and several camera landscape, neutral, portrait. None of the camera profiles I downloaded appear. I had an image selected and it is LR2. I must be missing something.
Thanks,
Tom

Thanks Kevin. I guess I don't understand how to use the profiles. The download had a whole bunch of camera profiles. I use a Nikon D200 and it was one of the included profiles. The camera isn't referenced in the pull down. Maybe it doesn't reference the make in the selections but I thought I read that you could select different cameras. Then again why would you want to do that?
Irregardless I like the effect.
Thanks again,
Tom

Similar Messages

  • Camera Matching Profiles for the Olympus E-3

    Lightroom provides 24 camera matching profiles for Canon, 21 for Nikon, 3 for Pentax and a single one for Leica but not one for any fourthirds camera. Olympus in particular is conspicuous by its abcence.  Might I encourage Adobe to give this serious consideration.  I believe in principle Lightroom to be a superior product to that offered by Olympus but until Adobe shows a willingness to support Olympus many dedicated Olympus users, and dedicated we are, will opt for alternative products.  To dispel and doubts about the level of interest and dedication in fourthirds, you have only to look at the activity on the fourthirds forum http://forum.fourthirdsphoto.com/ .
    As an aside, I know many cameras have gone into space but check this out http://www.olympus.com.au/images/stories/pr0902002.pdf . The Olympus E-3 is going to do a tour of duty at the International Space Station later this year. This must count for something.  I would have thought it desirable to be associated with such a camera.
    Perhaps I'm wrong and action is already underway to correct the situation.  If so, is there any indication when these profiles might be available?
    Bob Trlin

    Point taken guys.  There seems to be little interest in LR camera matching profiles in the Oly camp plus a tad of frustration.  They seem to favour a broad mix of products.  I might have to take another look at Olympus Studio 2 myself.  Thanks anyway.

  • ACR bug = wrong .dcp profiles displayed when Camera Matching profiles deleted

    ACR bug = wrong .dcp profiles displayed when (some) Camera Matching profiles deleted.
    Olympus E-M1
    I deleted some CM profiles from "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Olympus E-M1" (I replaced those w/ modified versions in a proper user folder and I do not want the original profiles to be displayed - too many profiles otherwise in a drop down list) and then all of a sudden some some Nikon CM profiles appeared instead in the drop down list... (no mods to .ORF file, so that can't be the reason)

    ACR bug = wrong .dcp profiles displayed when (some) Camera Matching profiles deleted.
    Olympus E-M1
    I deleted some CM profiles from "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Olympus E-M1" (I replaced those w/ modified versions in a proper user folder and I do not want the original profiles to be displayed - too many profiles otherwise in a drop down list) and then all of a sudden some some Nikon CM profiles appeared instead in the drop down list... (no mods to .ORF file, so that can't be the reason)

  • Question about future Camera Matching Profiles

    Hi all, I am a Nikon D300, Windows Vista user.
    Recently I've been comparing Camera Matching Profiles on ACR and Nikon's own proprietary Profiles on Nikon Capture NX with the same NEF files. What I've found is that Camera Matching Profiles don't match when Saturation is adjusted. If I increase saturation in Capture NX's Picture Control panel, not only saturation is increased but also local hue is shifted. For example, a yellow flower looks slightly reddish when saturation is increased. On the other hand, ACR increases only saturation. I'm not sure I said this appropriately, but you'll know what I'm saying if you compare them side by side. Set the Picture Control sliders all to zero, they match. But once Saturation is adjusted, don't.
    In addition, moving recovery slider, and HSL sliders shifts color in the way that I couldn't expect.
    I'm just curious how the future Camera Matching Profiles will deal with them.

    Thanks Eric. Even though those Camera Matching Profiles match only at default settings, they're really useful to me. I found that beta2 fixed highlight transition problem. I wish I could get that fat lazy Capture NX out of my computer soon.

  • White Balance tool and Camera Calibration Profiles

    Downloaded Lightroom v4 Beta 1 for mac but the installer package failed to launch. (com.apple.installer.pagecontroller error -1.) So I've only watched the adobe tv presentations todate.
    Anyway just wanted to give some feedback as a pro photographer about use of Lightroom and improvments I would like to see in the next version.
    I am a commercial photographer who needs colour accuracy in photographing fashion/garment images - most of my work is reproduced on a printing press for catalogues and brochures. On average a shoot will yeild about 500 images for a client, so workflow is important as they normally want them all!
    As a previous user of Capture One Pro v6 and now lightroom v3.6 - the biggest issue I have with Lightroom is the dominace of red tint when setting the white balance from a gray card reference image, shot at the same time as the images to be processed. I'm not adding anything to the images other than doing a white balance, a tweak on exposure and camera neutral setting on profiles.
    To obtain a white balance setting I use the combination of an  Xrite white balance card and the Q-Card and the old fasioned Kodak Gray cards all mounted on the same surface. I've used spot and ambient light readings on the gray cards to measure exposure and I've used the Adobe DNG Profiler and the Xrite colour checker profiler with the large colour checker card as a reference, (I've made profiles for sunny days, cloudy days, dual illuminant etc etc) and I'm viewing my images on a colour calibrated apple monitor.
    Not withstanding all of the above the best results I get out of Lightroom are using the camera profile neutral setting! Everthing else is just too red!! even though the images do look more punchy; for accuracy of actual colour I choose the camera neutral profile.
    Well when I say best results, those for colour critical garment photography and skin tones, these results are similar to those obtained from capture one pro v6.
    So for the Lightroom v4 I would like to see.
    1. White balance RGB values in numbers rather than percentages.
    2. Add and delete a colour readouts points with a dropper tool on an image to enable more acurate colour balancing particularly in shadow areas - (already available on capture one pro and adobe photoshop)
    3. Curves adjustments in all RGB channels (think you've done this)
    4. Output to CMYK profiles.
    5. Individual levels channel adjustment for RGB
    6. Ability re-organize my tools palette (add and remove) is per Capture One and Photoshop
    Regards

    The legacy ACR X.x profiles are no more produced nor included for newer cameras (AFAIK, since ACR 5.1/LR 2.1). The Adobe Standard is the new default starting point for these.
    While I am at it....are the Canon camera profiles I downloaded for the 1Ds MKII the same as for the 5D MKII or do I have to download different one...I suspect they are the same or Lightroom wouldn't offer them to me...is that correct?
    The profiles are different for each camera model, even if they share the same name in the Calibration panel. If you can see them when developing 5DII files, it means the camera-specific profiles are installed for your particular camera model (otherwise, you wouldn't see them).

  • File appearence not the same in PS CS4, LR2 and Camera RAW

    I've just noticed that files as displayed in Lightroom 2 or in Camera RAW, when opened in Photoshop CS4 have a different appearence. In Photoshop the file appears much flatter and with considerably less saturation and dynamic range. When you compare the files beside each other in RAW and in Lightroom, they look the same. I have tried exporting the files to Photoshop from Lightroom using the "open with Lightroom Edits" and Edit a Copy and Edit the original, but the results are the same. After editing a photo in Photoshop and saving it back into Lightroom, the photo appears very saturated in the Lightroom or in Camera RAW. I don't know how long this has been this way, but now that I hace noticed it, it is driving me nuts.
    Thanks for your help
    Steve

    Christopher thank you so much for responding and you have pinpointed the problem. The problem was the color settings. Color settings were set to sRGB and when I changed it to ProPhoto RGB Photoshop rendered file as it appears in the files in Lightroom and Camera RAW. I shoot in ProPhotoRGB and that seems to be why the images looked so flat when imported using sRGB.
    Thanks for taking the time to help
    Steve

  • Camera matching profiles for Olympus in PS CS4

    From where will I get the camera profile for my manufacturer (Olympus). I do have ACR 5.7 with Photoshop CS4.   I checked with Olympus, and they said that Adobe creates the camera profiles, not the manufacturers. Please provide some informaiton on it.

    Firstly, you might find more answers in the Camera Raw forum:  http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw
    You don't say what specific Olympus model you have, but Adobe is releasing a new version of Camera Raw very shortly.  Hopefully your model will be supported by that new version.
    -Noel

  • Do I Need the lens and camera profiles?

    I have been using Photoshop Elements for lots of years (currently on PSE 12).  Today I discovered over 400MB of Adobe lens (LCP) and camera (DCP) profiles.  It appears that the files have been on my system for many years.  None appear to be for any cameras I have.
    Do I need these for PSE?  Can I just delete them?
    -- Larry
    PS:  I know they are not causing any problems but I kind of like to keep things clean.  There are over 2300 such files.

    Those are installed with photoshop elements and updated when you update the camera raw plugin and also are used by the adobe dng converter, so leave them and do not delete them.
    If in the camera raw dialog you go to the Camera Calibration tab and look at the Camera Profile, those are part of the above files your asking about.

  • Not All Camera Raw Profiles Showing In Lightroom 2.3?

    Just downloaded the update for Lightroom 2.3 and am viewing a camera raw image (CRW file) shot on a Canon Powershot S50. According to what I've been able to ferret out on the Camera Raw / DNG pages, when I have that image selected and look at the Camera Calibration Settings profile options I should be see the original ACR 2.2 and 2.4 profiles plus 2 new profiles, an Adobe Standard profile plus one that mimics the manufacturer's own converter profile that starts with the word "Camera..." and goes on to mention the manufacturer and specific camera. I see only three - ACR 2.2, ACR 2.4, and Adobe Standard. The 4th one the Adobe Labs DNG materials seem to say I should be seeing is missing. Have I misread the documentation or is something wrong with the install? (I have not yet upgraded from Photoshop CS3 to CS4 so the Camera Raw converter over in Photoshop is still version 4.6 if that's relevant.)

    There are no camera matching profiles for the S50. From the Powershot series there are only matching profiles for the G9 and G10, so you should indeed only see ACR and Adobe standard profiles.

  • Camera Raw Profile made with Camera Profile Editor are 54 Ko

    And the "natives" one are 110 Ko.
    Am I doing something wrong ?

    The size of the profile depends on which color tables are included. When you use 'Both Color Tables' option, both illuminant A and D65 color tables are the same, so the profile size is optimized by only including 1 copy of the table. That's why the profile size falls to roughly half.
    The Camera Matching profiles are a little bigger because of a bigger table used to get a closer approximation to the camera-provided color rendition.

  • Using LR2 w/ Photoshop CS2 and Camera Raw 3.7

    I am using Photoshop CS2 and Camera Raw 3.7 on a Mac G4, OS X 10.4.11.
    I am about to install my upgrade to Lightroom 2. Is this a bad idea?
    I have read about some compatibility issues re Camera Raw, and I have also read about how to solve the issue of exporting the keywords.
    Will this keyword issue fix work on my system?
    What are the real-world practical implications of still having Camera Raw 3.7? I usually adjust images in Lightroom, then any further adjustment is done in Photoshop (not CR). So is the only downside going to be that if I revisit the image in Camera Raw, the adjustments will not show up? Or will it also not show up in Bridge?? And if it is only in CR, is it that the image does not have the adjustments; or does it show the adjusted image, but has just all the sliders zeroed out?
    I am hot to install LR2, but I want to make sure that I am not going to open a can of worms. And yes, I could buy PS CS4 (which would get me CR 4.5), and I would like to, but I don't have a G5. And I cannot afford to buy a new desktop computer right now.
    Any input would be much appreciated. Thanks.
    Dean Abramson

    >so is the LR version of RAW as good as the one in CS3?
    It's far better as it has local adjustments and such. Lightroom is more equivalent to the ACR in CS4. To make changes you make to images in ACR outside Lightroom show up in Lightroom, you need to sync the metadata. ACR does not write the changes to RAW images to the Lightroom database, but it writes it into xmp sidecars either right next to the RAW file or embedded into it. So Lightroom has no idea you did anything until you specifically ask it to check for updated metadata.
    Note that trying to work with both bridge/ACR and Lightroom on the same set of data will inevitably make you lose data or edits at some point as you're dealing with a synchronization issue, so be careful.

  • I have downloaded DNG Profile Editor 1_0_4 and prepared a profile which I can not see in my Camera Raw 6.0 (I have photoshop CS5). Could you please give me an advice?

    I have downloaded DNG Profile Editor 1_0_4 and prepared a profile which I can not see in my Camera Raw 6.0 (I have photoshop CS5). Could you please give me an advice?

    Uninstall Trusteer software
    http://www.trusteer.com/support/uninstalling-rapport-mac-os-x
    Remove Sophos
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/21069437#21069437

  • Color artifacts with A7s and A6000 files using Camera calibration profiles

    I'm seeing some really obvious chroma artifacts / false colors with RAW files from either a Sony A7s or A6000 when using any of the Adobe-provided Camera calibration profiles that emulate Sony's rendering.
    This seems to happen at any ISO, and is very frequent.
    If I use the Adobe Standard calibration profile then things look normal, but that's might just be because it produces rather desaturated images compared to the "sony" profiles.
    Prior to those Sony cameras I was using Nikon DSLRs for which I had somewhat similar issues when using the first version of the Nikon camera profiles.
    Those issues got fixed when Adobe released the "v4" camera profiles.
    Below are some examples without any adjustment, the only difference is the choice of camera calibration profile:
    Camera Landscape:
    Adobe Standard:
    Camera Standard:
    Adobe Standard:
    Camera Landscape:
    Adobe Standard:

    The legacy ACR X.x profiles are no more produced nor included for newer cameras (AFAIK, since ACR 5.1/LR 2.1). The Adobe Standard is the new default starting point for these.
    While I am at it....are the Canon camera profiles I downloaded for the 1Ds MKII the same as for the 5D MKII or do I have to download different one...I suspect they are the same or Lightroom wouldn't offer them to me...is that correct?
    The profiles are different for each camera model, even if they share the same name in the Calibration panel. If you can see them when developing 5DII files, it means the camera-specific profiles are installed for your particular camera model (otherwise, you wouldn't see them).

  • Camera Calibration Profiles And 5D MKII

    Until now I have been using a Canon 1Ds MKII and have had not only the downloaded Canon Camera Profiles available in the Calibration panel of the Develop Module but also the Adobe Standard, ACR 2.4, and ACR 4.4 profiles.  Recently I got a Canon 5D MKII and in Lightroom I only have available the Canon Camera Profiles and Adobe Standard.  The ACR 2.4 and 4.4 don't seem to be available as options with the 5D MKII RAW files.  I liked having them as they served as alternative rough starting points.  I am wondering what happened to them and how they can be gotten back as an option for the 5D MKII.  Has this happened to anyone else?
    While I am at it....are the Canon camera profiles I downloaded for the 1Ds MKII the same as for the 5D MKII or do I have to download different one...I suspect they are the same or Lightroom wouldn't offer them to me...is that correct?
    Howard

    The legacy ACR X.x profiles are no more produced nor included for newer cameras (AFAIK, since ACR 5.1/LR 2.1). The Adobe Standard is the new default starting point for these.
    While I am at it....are the Canon camera profiles I downloaded for the 1Ds MKII the same as for the 5D MKII or do I have to download different one...I suspect they are the same or Lightroom wouldn't offer them to me...is that correct?
    The profiles are different for each camera model, even if they share the same name in the Calibration panel. If you can see them when developing 5DII files, it means the camera-specific profiles are installed for your particular camera model (otherwise, you wouldn't see them).

  • Lightroom 2 and Camera Profiles for the Nikon D50

    Hi,
    I've installed Lightroom v2 and the new Camera Profiles, as per the instructions and various postings I should now see my camera name appear in the Profile section of Camera Calibration.
    The default profile is ACR 4.4 and when I drop the list down I see the usual settings and Camera D2X Mode 1 Beta 1, Mode 2, etc. but no reference to Nikon D50?
    The Metadata on my images is set to a Make of NIKON CORPORATION and a Model of NIKON D50.
    Looking in C:\programdata\adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\ I can see there is a D50 profile but Lightroom v2 isn't showing it.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks

    Explained in http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.59b60173/37?14@@ (see responses by Thomas Knoll)

Maybe you are looking for