LR3: Web Module: Image Info in RH Panel

If you enter Custom Text for Image Info->Title and Image Info ->Caption the custom text appears with every image in the gallery.  Is there a way to annotate each image with a unique comment such as the names of the people in the pictire?

Known bug, thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Web module images not showing up

    Problem tested on 2 machines, Windows 7 and 8.
    When going from develop to the web module very often images and / or thumbnails doesnt show up, the program shows only empty spaces. VERY annoying!
    Anyone know if something can be done about it?

    will they show if you wait for a while?

  • LR3 Web module not loading pix of collection

    Hi All,
    I still have the same problem using the web module, which doesn't load all the pictures of the collection, and bugs. I never had this problem before using LR2. Does anybody encounter the same issue? Is there a way to fix this ?
    Thanks for your help,
    Sebastien

    Resolved the problem.Found a tag missing from web.xml file.

  • Image Info setting in Lightroom Web Module

    I watched the Turning Gate Podcast on how to customize the text used for photo titles, captions and other items in Lightrooms web module.
    In the Podcast pictures I noticed that in the web module Image Info pane section there are four individual settings available: Title, Caption, Annotations and a fourth one which I could not read.
    In my version of Lightroom (Version 1.3) I have only Caption and Title available (displayed). How do I get the others displayed?
    Franz

    Brent,
    On the left hand side double click on hard drive under "Publish Services" then do the following
    In the Publish Services panel on the left side of the Library module, click the Adobe Revel connection Set Up button.
    In the Lightroom Publishing Manager dialog box, look under Account and click Authorize.
    Follow the prompts to allow Adobe Revel to communicate with Lightroom.
    I played around with it to figure out different features of publishing Lightroom to Revel.
    Once you have it set up then can create a new collection/abum by control clicking on the Adobe Revel.  Then you can add image from your hard drive by dragging and dropping them into an album.
    Then select "Publish" when you are done. Log in to your Revel account and check to make sure the images show up.
    You can add watermarks to the images if you like.
    Let me know if you have any other questions
    Thanks
    Scott

  • Web module problems in LR3

    Hi,
    I've been happily using LR1.3 for a while, exporting flash galleries from the 'web module' using SlideShowPro. I upgraded to LR3 last week, now when I go to the Web Module, none of the flash galleries work, not SSP, nor the simpleviewer etc. ones. I've removed the old LRwebengines and replaced with the latest LR3 one's for the relevent galleries, I've also updated the flash player, still no joy.
    All the paremeter options show in the right hand pane for each of the galleries, but the main window is just black. The top left info panel briefly shows a 'copying resources' progress bar and then a 'task completed' message, but nothing shows in the main window.
    Any ideas?
    Edit, although the main preview screen is blank, I can export the gallery [certainly with SlideShowPro anyway] and the exported gallery is fine.

    Yes the service ticket is still open. They have remoted to my computer. My last contact was that it was being sent up to Sr. Engineer. My problem goes away when I disable my wireless adapter. I think this weekend I will try hooking up to server with cable and see what happens. For now I am like you I use it by disabling the adapter then work on the galleries. Of coarse I can not push direct to my web site so I export to my desktop then us CuteFTP to up load. Like you this is a pain. I am still hoping they will find a fix. I have told them that I am not the only one having problem.
    Hang in there.
    Brad

  • LR.3.3 Web module not picking up image edits

    When I create a slideshow in LR3.3, it does not pick up the edits that I made to the images. The only things it picks up are crop and maybe sharpening (hard to tell). Haven't had the problem before today. Any help will be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    John

    Pierluigi Vernetto, thanks for that link. Though it was for a web module consumption of the persistence package, I was able to adapt it for use by my ejb module.
    Here is my solution, under split-directory development workflow.
    Create the persistence module, place the persistence.xml in that module's META-INF.
    Create an Ant task in the build.xml to 'wlcompile' and JAR it to the EAR direcotries APP-INF/lib directory.
    Exclude the persistence module from the rest of the 'wlcompile' and 'appc' tasks.
    I was then able to inject it with annotation in my EJB module.
    dvohra16, thanks for that pointer. Now that I've been able to solve, the pressure is off (and shifted to other things). But I will surely check your option out. If I can get that working, it will be much easier than tinkering around with the build.xml and would be the normal flow of split-directory development workflow.
    As of now, I will say this thread as 'solved', but if I get it working the way you mention (on my sandbox project), I will surely come back and update this thread.
    Edited by: Vyoma on May 27, 2011 11:21 AM

  • Why Does Lightroom Web Module Export Images At 240 ppi?

    Firstly, please forgive my ignorance on this subject. I am in the process of getting together a website of my images and have been experimenting with preparing the images and thumbnails through Lightroom's web module. I've noticed that when opening the finished images in Elements, that they have all been converted at 240ppi. Surely, images for websites should be at 72ppi (or possibly 96ppi)? Or am I dimmer than even I thought? 

    should I simply ignore the resolution box?
    Yes indeed. You set the size unit box in the export dialog simply to pixels and then size the right number of pixels for your web use. Typical is for example 800 pixels on the long end. The resolution box is not relevant for web use. It is really only used as a hint to a final printing size.
    So I imagine the 240ppi conversion must be the Lightroom default value. Do you think?
    Very likely so. I believe Lightroom, just like Photoshop, assumes 240 for files that do not start out having the tag so that is probably what happened if this started as a scan. Many scanners do not write this tag at all, but most DSLRs write the tag into their files and it is usually 240 for older generation cameras and 300 for later ones. I don't know why they do that as it is again not relevant as people print at any size they want.

  • Why does my Web Publishing Tool fail to create an image of my front panel when I select the "Embedded" viewing mode?

    I am trying to create an html file for access by a client computer through the LabVIEW Web Server. I want to enable the client to control the vi, so am chosing "Embedded" for the Viewing Option in the Web Publishing Tool. The small preview screen in the Web Publishing Tool shows an image of my front panel, but the resulting html file does not include this image. The Web Server error log shows a 404 error which I believe is due to the lack of an image (or any front panel objects) present in the html file: Error: 404 "Not Found" for "/.lv_frontpanelprotocol.rpvi100", file "c:/program files/national instruments/labview 2010/www/.lv_frontpanelprotocol.rpvi100": Can't access URL
    If you are aware of this problem or know any solutions, please post a reply.
    Thanks,
    David

    Does it work if you preview the web page locally?
    Does the client computer have at least the minimum 2010 run time engine installed?
    (quote: Additionally, the Run-Time Engine allows your browser to display VIs that are embedded in Web pages.")
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • WEB module export image size

    Team, I am
    exporting just two images from the Web Mo
    dule...using the basis HTML
    gallery template.
    The original image size is 4972K (4.9Mb)
    After I select export in the web module, the resulting image is around
    200K in the content\images\large directory.
    I have the "Large Images" Quality slider at 100
    Is is the case...that no matter what...the image will be manipulated or reduced in size by the web module engine?
    I would like the original image to be exported out to the content\images\large directory.
    Is this possible?
    I was just on phone with support...close to two hours...disconnected twice...but the phone support folks were not aware of what I am doing.
    I am using LR 3.3 in Windows...if that matters.
    Thank You,
    -Rich O
    [email protected]

    Rich,
    RichO2010 wrote:
    Beat, I have not made any adjustments.  Not sure where "Image Pages" are.  But, under the Web module, I have tried several "Large Images" quality settings under the "Output Settings"
    You find this setting under the Appearance section:
    I am getting the sense that no matter what...the LR Webgallery engine wants to "optimize" the images for web output.
    I just want the people that visit the site, the ability to download the original image...unaltered.
    I have not found a way to go beyond 2071 pixels for image width in Web Gallery.
    From what i am reading so far, I think I should just let the galley engine do its work. Then come back and upload the original images under the content\images\large (or whatever the output destination might be).
    That might be a way to achieve what you want. There might be side-effects regarding borders, watermarks etc.
    Beat

  • Does Web Module size and convert RAW images to jpeg?

    I have never used the Web module before. It looks pretty straightforward but I have one question:
    What about images? Does Lightroom take the original RAW images from the library that I've chosen to go into the web site and 'pare the down' or re-size them to be appropriate size for the web site and I assume it would also convert them to jpegs in sizes needed for preview and for thumbnails?
    I assume that when you start the 'machinery' for Lightroom to build the web site that it will put all of the images needed as copies from the originals into a proper folder that can be then uploaded to the web?
    Thanks,
    Ken
    PS: if I choose a flash template, which are pretty nice, does it also include the flash module so that people can run the flash presentation on their computers?

    It will convert all images to jpegs, resize ... however you set it up ... and yes, it is so straightforward as it seems to be .
    It makes no sense to upload RAW files to the web for public use in the first place. Second, LR does not touch/change the RAW files. Therefore, how would it be able to integrate your dev settings when using RAW on export?
    You can add the ftp target in LR and it will upload directly to your web server.
    If you choose Flash-based, people need to have the Adobe Flash player installed on their computer. The Flash player itself is not part of the LR setup. Most of people already have it installed and who doesnt will be asked to install it.

  • Pixelated lines across images from the web module in LR

    I use Lightroom 5.2 and am having problems when exporting via the Web module. When I use the basic LR HTML template or plug-ins like Juicebox and TTG, there are pixelted lines acorss some (but not all) of the images. This has started to happen in the last few weeks. Any thoughts/suggestions?

    Here's my guess ... somehow the file has gotten corrupted.
    I can't tell you exactly what step it got corrupted at ... you'll have to do the research ... it could be that it is corrupt on your hard disk, and Lightroom is attempting to use a corrupted photo; or it could be when Lightroom exports via the Web Module the file is saved in correupted form (most likely cause is a bad hard disk); or it could get corrupted in the upload; or it could be corrupted on the hard disk on the server (bad hard disk again).

  • Web module: All Flash Galleries have a 'cool' tone on images

    My monitor is calibrated 3x year and I have no other issues with color anywhere but in the Web module and only when I use ANY Flash gallery.  This has been a problem for me since 4.0 was installed (now on 4.2) 
    Before any of the images (sRGB jpegs) are selected, the template appears and the preview image is 'blue' and I see the same cool cast on all the navigation bars (see screen capture below of the standard Flash gallery *BEFORE* the images load and notice the 'blue' boxes- this is how 'cool' my images become . 
    Once the images are chosen and loaded, all the images have the same blue/cool tone look.  Again this is ONLY occuring on the Flash Gallery templates.  I have been using a workaround by creating virtual copies and 'warming them' before moving to the WEb module.
    Anyone else have this issue?

    Appears it wont work. Since the last project didnt require
    any installs from the end user, I wont be able to get away with it
    for this one.
    (user would need to have AIR installed on their machine)
    http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/AIR:Developer_FAQ#Can_I_create_CD-ROM_or_kiosk_applic ations_that_leverage_Adobe_AIR.3F

  • Lightroom 1.3 Web Module - Appearance Panel Partially Hidden

    When I go to the Web module, the right margin of the Appearance panel is partially hidden such that I can't access all of the controls....it's driving me nuts. Is this just me or is anyone else having this problem. I can't figure out how to shift the panel horizontally. Any help would be appreciated. Happy New Year!
    Bill
    PS - running on a 17" Macbook Pro with a 30" external monitor, OSX 10.5, LR 1.3.1

    Try restarting LR. Try cycling between Fullscreen modes with 'f'.
    Try Shift-tab a couple times to hide and show the panels to see if this affects the panel. Are you attempting to use, using two monitors?
    Obviously I grasping at straws here, but this ain't usual!
    Don
    Don Ricklin, MacBook 2Ghz Duo 2 Core running 10.5.1 & Win XP, Pentax *ist D
    See LR Links list at my
    Blog for related sites.

  • LR3 Web Gallery Sequence Numbering bug?

    Anyone else getting this problem with sequence numbering in the web HTML templates? Basically, as you jump through photos the photo number is always stuck on #1, never changes when you go to the next photo - should go 1, 2, 3, 4, 5...
    I just sent a bug report but, wondering if anyone else found a fix for this yet.
    This is in LR3 on Mac - really trying to do this on TTG Highslide gallery but, same problem occurs in default Lightroom HTML gallery.
    Thanks.
    ******BUG******
    Concise problem statement:
    Steps to reproduce bug:
    1. Go to Web Module
    2. Choose default HTML Gallery
    3. Under Image Info set Caption to Sequence
    Results:
    Sequence caption always shows 1/total images.
    i.e. 1/10,  1/10,  1/10,  1/10
    Expected results:
    Sequence should increment current image number / total images as you click through images.
    i.e. 1/10, 2/10, 3/10, 4/10

    Yeah, still have the numbering problem using the Image Info sequence outputs.
    But, if you use the standard Lightroom Flash Gallery it has it's own sequence numbering output (that does not use Image Info captions)  and it does work correctly. These show up as 1/9, 2/9, 3/9 etc. on each photo down by the back/next buttons.
    Also, the Cell Numbering does work when using the Lightroom HTML Gallery - though, those numbers only appear on the index page not on individual photos.
    But, haven't seen a good work-around yet for sequence numbering in Image Info area. Only option there seems to be typing numbers manually into the caption. Or, if you need the caption for other info maybe use one of the IPTC fields like Headline to type in your numbers. You can then do a Custom Setting in web module to have those text fields show up with your photos.
    Really hoping we will see a LR 3.1 sometime soon with a fix - should be an easy correction for Adobe.

  • Question regarding using Lightroom Web Module and Zenfolio

    I use LR3 and like the galleries I can make in the Web Module.  If I use Zenfolio as a web hosting service, can I upload or export my photos from LR to Zenfolio and use the galleries I create in the Lightroom Web Module,,,or do I need to use the existing gallery templates in Zenfolio?  If that is the case, other than using Lightroom to upload photos, is it's Web Gallery Module superflous?
    Thanks,
    Matthew Kraus

    Matthew,
    If you are asking if you need to use LR's Web Module to export images to Zenfolio, then no you would not use the LR Web Module but rather use a plug-in to export directly to Zenfolio.  Or you can just export to your local HDD and use Zenfolio's upload module to grab the files from your local drive.
    Jeffery Friedl has a nice LR plug-in for SmugMug so I am sure his Zenfolio plug-in will work nicely as well:
    http://regex.info/blog/lightroom-goodies/zenfolio
    It's free, sort of, after the trial period, like 45-days as I recall, there is a limit on the number of files which can be uploaded.  When the trial expires if ya like it you just donate any amount and get to upload any number of files as Zenfolio allows in a session.
    Does that help answer your question?

Maybe you are looking for