LR4 too small on Dell XPS15

I recently purchase a Dell XPS15 and install LR4.  The problem is the screen display LR4 in such a small font and option boxes it's impossible to read. Is there a fix for this?  I really don't want to change the resolution on my laptop every time I run LR4.

There is an option "Largest - 200%" for the font size available in Lightroom 5.3 (Windows 8.1) which makes the font quite readable on my XPS 15.
(Medium is 100% and Large is 150%)
FYI: Photoshop CC still has fonts/icons that are at the smaller 100% size. Scaling to 200% has yet to be fixed by Microsoft/Adobe. It is very difficult to use currently (one must have good knowledge of the keyboard shortcuts vs clicking with mouse)
Bruce

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop Elements UI font too small on high-resolution display

    Hi,
    I have recently purchased a Dell XPS15 laptop with a QHD+ (3200x1800) display. The PC is running Windows 8.1. I have also purchased Photoshop Elements 12 to run on it.
    With the display at the native resolution, it is necessary to have the "Change the size of all items" option in the display settings of Windows 8.1 set to "Larger", in order for the native Windows fonts and UI elements to be at a reasonable size. The laptop came with this option enabled by default.
    However, disappointingly the UI font size in Photoshop Elements is way too small when the display is at the native resolution. The application is basically unusable.
    I have tried setting the "Use system font" option in the General preferences, but this doesn't seem to help.
    The only way I can get the Photoshop Elements UI font to a reasonable size, is by dropping the screen resolution (to say 1920x1080).
    This seems like a terrible waste of a beautiful screen, particularly when my main reason for using the PC is for editing photos, and my photo management and editing software is preventing me exploiting the full resolution of the display.
    I'd appreciate any help or suggestions.
    Thanks.

    Unfortunately there is no option in PSE to vhange the UI fonts (other than switching to System Font' in preferences. So traditionally changing the Windows display font size has been the only workaround, and even that can cause problems with individual menus disappearing and being replaced with a hard to spot  >> drop-down menu.
    If you have a dual-display system you could have the menus on the lower resolution screen with images on the hi-res.
    Cheers,
    Neale
    Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children
    If this post or another user's post resolves the original issue, please mark the posts as correct and/or helpful accordingly. This helps other users with similar trouble get answers to their questions quicker. Thanks.

  • Display issue - Photoshop useless with Dell XPS15

    Hi I ve recent'y bought a Dell XPS15 designed for graphism but Photoshop display is too small(useless). It's fine with illustrator and indesign. Any solution? i ve seen I'm not the only one like that. Thanks a lot for your help.

    Trevor.Dennis wrote:
    You've bought a 15 inch notebook with a 3200 x 1800 display, and stuff looks small on it?   What on earth did you expect?
    That's not the point, Trevor, and a somewhat belittling comment to make: the OP obviously meant that Photoshop's GUI is tiny looking on a retina screen.
    If you happen to be using Photoshop CC, you can got to Preferences > Experimental features and check Scale UI 200%...  What that will do is turn your 3200 x 1800 display into a 1600 x 900 display.  I hope you can see the irony in that.
    That is an untrue and a ridiculous statement: the 200% patch scales up the GUI elements, and certainly DOES NOT decrease her retina display resolution to a 1600 x 900 one. The guides, images, pixels, and so on still display at 3200x1800px.
    As a matter of fact, a couple of users working on retina screens in this forum have already complained about the guides being too thin for comfort, since the 200% patch (yes, it is a patch, and not a real solution) only takes GUI elements into account.
    Retina screens are common place technology, and have been for a while now. Photoshop is still having issues with Retina screens on Windows, and it ought to have been fixed by now after years of complaints by users. That is the issue at hand here - not the supposedly unwise (in your opinion) decision to purchase a laptop with a retina screen.
    And regarding CS6: I find it ridiculous that Adobe continues to sell CS6 without a disclaimer or warning that some applications' GUIs are incompatible with retina screens on Windows. Warn potential customers, fix it, or stop selling it. Since Adobe made it quite abundantly clear they have no intention to fix this issue in CS6, at the very least a warning in the system requirements ought to be issued about retina screen incompatibilities.

  • Is 3.5" screen too small?

    I love these new displays and all, but I'm starting to think 3.5" is just too small. It's a very introverted experience. I'm using a Dell Streak now with a 5 inch screen, it's about the same thickness as the Iphone4, but with a much bigger screen. I was planing to have both Iphone and an Android phone, but there's no getting around this small screen problem now that I've tried something bigger. will Apple ever develop a larger screen? Even 4 inches like the EVO is better.
    Please no Android vs. Apple debate, I'm wondering if 3.5" will be extinct soon and Apple will ever come out with a 4 or 5 inch phone. They've already achieved the highest resolution needed so the only way to improve now would be to make the screen bigger, right?

    I had a 3GS and I loved it but I upgraded to the HTC HD2 after 6 months just for the larger 4.3" screen and gave my 3GS to my mum, can't get her off it
    I mostly use my phones for sat nav use so the large screen is amazing.
    It's much thinner than the 3GS and very quick and not that much bigger than the 3GS because HTC made the screen corner to corner unlike the massive bezel on the iPhones.
    I never found the size to be a problem and fits into my pockets just fine, can even just about use it one handed.
    Have owned it for about 6 months and love it, very clear and crisp screen but I do miss my 100 iPhone apps, many that I paid for.
    I do have an iPhone 4 32gb on the way to replace my HTC HD2 once Apple decide to ship it, should be here around the 14th July, hopefully much sooner.
    Can't wait to play with it, amazes me that they squeezed all the technology into something even thinner than my already very thin HD2
    Will really miss the 4.3" screen though, shame Apple didn't use a 3.7" screen at least. For me 4" and 4.3" is the sweet spot.
    Message was edited by: Radeon123

  • CS6 menus and tool bars too small

    I have a new Dell XPS15 laptop with Windows 8. Installed Photoshop CS6 & all tool bars and menus are too tiny. I've contacted Dell Support and Adobe Support and everyone blames the other guy. Please help.

    This is a PC only issue, I believe Macs with Retina displays do not have this problem...  I just got a Dell M3800 with a QHD+ 3200x1800 display and sadly yes, all Adobe CC products and AVID editing software are pretty much unusable in hi-res mode under Windows 8.1.  That is especially disturbing when Dell claims that the M3800 is certified to run those applications without mention of the resolution limitation which is a pretty big deal for anyone working in the graphic and video business.  False advertising it is

  • Fonts on CS6 are too small

    Any updates to solve the problem?

    Attach an external Display that displays more pixels at a lower resolution like a dell ultrasharp 32"  UP3214Q displaye 3840px by 2160px a 16:9 aspect ratio at only 140DPI text should be quite readable.  Before there were displays with high resolution DPI most displays had a resolution around 96DPI so the font used in applications UI were designed for 96DPI displays they should be readable at 140dpi.  I have used 15" 1600x1200 displays for years their 133DPI resolution display fonts slightly smaller and much sharper then 96DPI displays. Your MPB LCD has a resolution of 220DPI at that resolution fonts designed for 96DPI displaye will be less the 1/5 the size they display at 96DPI. At 140DPI they will be 1/2 the size as displayed at 96dpi. 2.5 times the size of text on your 240dpi display. Your MBP supports 3840x2160 via HDMI at 30HZ.
    These days Applications and OS need to be updated to support high dpi resolution displays. This will not happen over night.  IBM introduced the 204DPI T221 22.2" 16"10 aspect ratio display that displayed 3840x2400 pixels 9,2MP in 2001 and UI fonts were displayed too small..  Its now 2014 some 13 years later.... IBM T220/T221 LCD monitors - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  • ITunes Windows too small

    Just a comment. This does not affect the operation of iTunes but I just wanted to point this out. Your panes such as the New Releases, Just For You, Exclusives and Staff Favorites are slightly too small. Since I can't adjust the font size, the names of the artists are always cut off on the bottom. Can you , in future revisions, make the panes adjustable or just make them bigger so the information is not cut off? Thanks, and if by chance there is something in my setup that is wrong please let me know?
    Dell 8400   Windows XP Pro   iTunes 6.0.5.20
    Dell 8400   Windows XP Pro  

    Hi, Jeff,
    Just FYI, the Discussions are pretty much just your fellow users. Apple employees rarely read these posts. If you want to make a suggestion to Apple about iTunes, the best way is through the iTunes feedback page

  • Windows 8.1 RDP pci/font size too small

    I just purchased a Dell Xps 15 Windows 8.1 and am struggling with many apps including RDP which I use daily for several clients. I have searched on line for suggestions. I can connect but the font is tiny. I am not even sure if I have the correct RDP installed
    but I have tried all options on what I have to no avail.  My old laptop with Windows 7 is "dandy".  Any help would be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Did you choose one of the high-resolution screens offered with the XPS 15?  For example, 3200 x 1800 or 3840 x 2160?  If yes then that explains why you are having problems when connecting to hosts that do not support dynamic scaling. 
    Depending on your vision even the 1920x1080 option may be too small for comfort.
    One thing you may consider is to hook up an external monitor that is much lower resolution and larger size and use that for your remote desktop windows when connecting to older operating system versions.
    -TP

  • Photoshop resolution on Macbook Pro 15" Retina display too small

    I've just bought a Macbook Pro 15" and I'm trying to use Photoshop, but the resolution its displaying the images at for 100% are too small. I have to design for the web, so need to be intricate with detail, but I'm finding it adjusts the resolution of the image right down. (I mean you can see the image clearly, but it's too small to edit). When I look at Safari and see a web page at 100% it's clear, but the same page displayed in Photoshop CC appears 50% of the size (even though it says it's 100%)
    If I move the application window to another screen it adjusts it correctly  – leaving all the pallettes, menus and tools correctly sized as they are on the retina display
    Is there some way to adjust the way Photoshop CC displays images so it is more consistent with what you actually see?
    There doesn't seem to be any answer on the Adobe forum, so hopefully someone here can shed some light.

    quaetapo wrote:
    Well that certainly helps in terms of making the image larger – only problem is with the low resolution there's a loss of clarity and pixelisation of the image; so not the same level of quality...
    In System Preferences/Display, what resolution do you have your screen set to? Try changing that also to see if the two settings can work together. Also, since the vast majority of users (Mac or PC) don't have Retina Displays, isn't what you're seeing with Low Resolution checked in Photoshop closer to what most people will see? Remember that Apple's software, such as Safari, have been upgraded to take full advantage of the rMBP display; most other browsers, especially in Windows, haven't.
    And if you want to tinker with the rMBP's resolution even further, check out "Eye-Friendly" in the App Store.

  • The ADO NET Source was unable to process the data. ORA-64203: Destination buffer too small to hold CLOB data after character set conversion.

     We developed a SSIS Package to pull the data From Oracle source to Sql Server 2012. Here we used ADO.Net source to pull the records from Source but getting the below error after pulling some 40K records.
      [ADO NET Source [2]] Error: The ADO NET Source was unable to process the data. ORA-64203: Destination buffer too small to hold CLOB data after character set conversion.
    [SSIS.Pipeline] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_PRIMEOUTPUTFAILED. 
     The PrimeOutput method on ADO NET Source returned error code 0xC02090F5. 
     The component returned a failure code when the pipeline engine called PrimeOutput(). 
    The meaning of the failure code is defined by the component, 
    but the error is fatal and the pipeline stopped executing. 
     There may be error messages posted before this with more 
    information about the failure.
    Anything that we can do to fix this?

    Hi,
      Tried both....
      * Having schema type as Nvarchar(max). - Getting the same error.
      * Instead of ADO.Net Source used OLEDB Source with driver as " Oracle Provide for OLE DB" Getting error as below.
           [OLE DB Source [478]] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_OLEDBERROR.  An OLE DB error has occurred. Error code: 0x80004005.
           [SSIS.Pipeline] Error: SSIS Error Code DTS_E_PRIMEOUTPUTFAILED.  The PrimeOutput method on OLE DB Source returned error code 0xC0202009.  The component returned a failure
    code when the pipeline engine called PrimeOutput(). The meaning of the failure code is defined by the component, but the error is fatal and the pipeline stopped executing.  There may be error messages posted before this with more information about the
    failure.
    Additional Info:
       * Here the Source task is getting failed not the conversion or destination task.
    Thanks,
    Loganathan A.

  • Error "roll area too small"! Can't find a way to resolve!Please hep.

    Hello everyone:
           i am getting the error "roll area too small" when I am looping through an internal table and calling the code below on change of some value.
    ===
    CALL FUNCTION 'GET_PRINT_PARAMETERS'
          EXPORTING
            authority              = space
            immediately            = space
            new_list_id            = c_x
            no_dialog              = c_x
           user                   = sy-uname
          IMPORTING
            out_parameters         = params
          EXCEPTIONS
            archive_info_not_found = 1
            invalid_print_params   = 2
            invalid_archive_params = 3
            OTHERS                 = 4.
        IF sy-subrc NE 0.
          CLEAR : params.
        ENDIF.
    The printer destination has to be set up
        params-pdest = v_dest.
        params-prtxt = v_spool_text.
        params-paart = lc_paart.
        params-prtxt = v_spool_text.
        params-primm = 'X'.
        params-prrel = space.
        NEW-PAGE PRINT ON PARAMETERS params NO DIALOG.
        NEW-PAGE PRINT OFF.
    ======
    I posted this before and got some feedback and tried everything but it is not fixing the problem! I rewarded points to all the answers. I had basis increase roll area size, optimized code and did everything I can but I am still getting the same error "roll area too small". Same program works in 4.6C but in ECC6.0 I get this error! I have other programs that generates more than 10,000 pages in the spool but the program I am working on creates only 7700 pages! I  am not sure what else is changed in ECC6.0! Could someone please give me any ideas? rewards assured.
    thanks.
    Mithun

    Hello Mithun,
    Even i think increasing the roll area should have helped
    Are both the systems WIndows based  or is one unix based ?
    see this
    http://listserv.sap.com/pipermail/linux.general/2001-July/thread.html#670
    and search for "roll area too small" in the list of links
    it may help
    Also,
    in this solution, it says to use 'field groups'
    http://www.sapfans.com/sapfans/forum/r2all/messages/42.html
    Try these links as well - others with the same problem
    http://marc.info/?l=mysap-linux-general&w=4&r=1&s=%22rollareatoo+small%22&q=b
    Message was edited by:
            Kris Donald

  • Photoshop CC icons and text are too small: how to adjust so they're readable? [was: Joanne]

    I have just downloaded Creative Cloud on a new computer.  The new photoshop icons and text are too small for me to see or work with.  I cannot seem to adjust this so its "useable"

    Hey Bob,
    Ive put feature requests for this in before and I know many others have as well. Is there any way to see if Adobe is actually working on this? I dont really consider this a feature request, it should be standard with the software. A feature request would be something like creative cloud libraries, not the ability to make font sizes and icons bigger.

  • UI text too small

    Is there a way to make the text in the UI larger?The default size is too small and strains the eyes.

    tidysteve wrote:
    but doesn't that make it system wide ??? not just for aperture ???
    it was intended as a tool to use by those that are legally blind to zoom any part of the os, we use it every day as a teaching/demoing tool.
    you can also zoom into a photo or video without creating artifacts/pixelation which the normal zoom tool does on many apps
    i suppose you could just change it back and forth ...
    apple option 8 -- toggles it on and off, or you can use one "Butler" hot key for it http://www.manytricks.com/butler/
    http://www.petermaurer.de/butler/
    victor

  • Thumbnails in "OPEN" dialog box too small to see!

    The thumbnails are  too small in the open dialog box so that I can't see the file I want to open.  Yes, you can make them bigger in finder itself...but I am always opening pictures and I just can't see them!
    Almost as frustrating as the column issue.   The name column is very very wide when I try to open a file.. so I can't sort by the other columns without dragging over the bar at the bottom of the screen.  THis is so so frustrating.  I resize but it doesn't stick to the next session.
    Apple invented the finder.  Why is it so inferior to windows explorer?

    The only solution to enlarging the icons in an application open dialog window is to use the Accessibility panel in System Preferences. Under Zoom, enable Use keyboard shortcuts to zoom.
    The first time you have an application open dialog, you press the keys: option + command + =  as many times as you want to zoom in. This will enlarge the open dialog window and its contents. When done, press option + command + 8 to restore normal window size. Subsequently, you can alternatively press option + command + 8 to zoom to the previous setting, or return to normal zoom.
    This is as good as it is going to get. The applications (not just Apple’s) only use a subset of Finder’s settings in the open dialogs, and these do not include icon enlargement settings, which as you realize, are part of the actual Finder’s settings. The application development frameworks, and not Finder, are remiss in not providing icon size adjustments in open dialog windows.
    You can provide feedback to Apple regarding OS X.

  • Open/save dialog boxes stuck at (too small) default size

    I've been having a relatively small issue with Mountain Lion that has become a big hassle. In past versions of OS X, whenever I'd resize an open/save dialog box in an application, it would be that size the next time I went to open/save. In Mountain Lion, however, those dialog boxes always default to the smallest possible size (which is too small to read a filename longer than a few characters). so I have to resize the dialog box — every time! I open and save a lot of files, so this gets pretty tedious. This doesn't seem to happen in apple programs, but it definitely does in the Office Suite and the Adobe Creative Suite, especially in CS4 Photoshop and Illustrator. Might be I can fix it by myself but I can't imagine where I may dig it.

    You might try looking here for the Adobe products:
    Adobe Help and Support
    Try Microsoft support for the Office Products:
    http://www.microsoft.com/mac

Maybe you are looking for

  • What are the file name(s) for CS6 scratch data on Mac?

    I see people saying the file (or is it multiple files?) is kept in the HD root. I don't see anything there (I only have one drive) that looks relevant to Photoshop, even when I view invisible files. Anyone know where the file is, and what it's named?

  • Material Movements between location

    Hi Gurus, A Particular material has to be controlled to move/ transfer between particular location/Plant, (For Ex Plant 1000, Material Glass, When i receive from customer as returns, i have to receive the material to the particular location, it shoul

  • ID CS2 Windows XP Pro - How long should adding pages take?

    I am using InDesign CS2 in Windows XP Pro. I have an ID book file with 13 sections, approximately 20-25 pages in each section. There are approximately 4,000-5,000 images on the pages (total on all pages). I am using auto page numbering and am trying

  • OBUSOBJECT Blocked for conversion and not getting activated

    I  have changed the infoobject OBUSOBJECT attribute 0Mainusage fron <b>navigational to display</b> and then tried activating the OBUSOBJECT , , OBUSOBJECT If in the former active version this IO had 0MAINUSAGE as a nav attribute, now, in a revised ve

  • Question about @SuppressWarnings()

    Hi all, I use for on collection and the compiler give me a warning to use for each loop. I can't use the for each loop in this section beacuse i get generic with wildcard, List<? extends Number> listOfUnknown My question is what is the right warning