LR5.3 incorrect image size export

When exporting an image and specifying to resize 1500 pixels on the long edge I get this result 2541 x 1500, which is exactly the same result when I specify the short edge. I have tried this with cropped images and with uncropped images, same nonsense. Any fix (in LR)?

Have you got "Don't Enlarge" checked in the Export settings? There's a bug that was identified in the 5.3RC when resizing in certain situations with "Don't Enlarge" checked, so try the export again with that optionn unchecked.
I guess the bug was identified too late in the RC for a fix to be included in the 5.3 Final.

Similar Messages

Incorrect image size and low quality file (Photoshop CC trial ver. on Macbook Pro Retina)

At first, I set 500x500 size
but in workplace, it show smaller than 500x500 (maybe 250x250?)
I check on "image > image size" it still show me 500x500 pixels
Save for web
After that, i got a 500x500 file but It resize from smaller to 500x500 , so... i got a low quality file.
what's wrong?
(sorry for bad english skill but i really want your help)
Ps. it also incorrect when i set resolution as 300dpi

Pixel is not a measurement unit of length per se.
If a screen has more pixels per unit of length an image (when displayed as one image pixel per one screen pixel) would appear smaller than on a screen with lower resolution.
To make sure could you please post an image that is 500px x 500px (according to Image > Image Size) but seems to be too small to you?

Export works not correct in LR5.3; ignore image size.

BUG: The export works not correct in LR5.3 When the field "Dont enlarge" are activated Lightroom ingnores the settings of image sizing and export the pictures in original size. Where can fix it?

Another option, if you're not into using plugins (Exportant) to fix:
Export in 2 groups - those needing resizing and those that do not (e.g. using lib-filters or smart-collections):
* Export those needing resizing normally (but with "don't enlarge" unchecked).
* Export those not needing resizing without resizing.
I mean, re-installing Lr5.2 may be a fine-enough work-around, but so ya know: Lr5.4 is likely to be out soon, with problem fixed...
PS - Get Lr5.2 here:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=113&platform=Windows
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=113&platform=Macintosh
Rob

Incorrect Image Size Insert/Download into/from Database

We have used the Oracle Forms6i version 6.0.8.18.3 to add picture by using the
statement:
read_image_file(get_file_name,'JFIF','s_image.image');
The database used is Oracle 9i version 9.0.3.0
The original picture is a JPEG file which is with 10,484kB file system size.
After inserting into the database via the Forms6i, the size in database is
2,152,740 Bytes only! Then we download this picture from the database into the
local hard disk of a machine with Forms 6i statement:
write_image_file('output.jpg','JFIF','s_image.image');
The file 'output.jpg' is with 1,958,603 Bytes!!!
We then examine the two files and found that the resolution of the original
picture is 305dpi but the one downloaded from database is just 72dpi!
We have the following property for the image item 's_image':
image format: JFIF
image depth: original or RGB
compression quality: none
display quality: high
sizing style: adjust
Please advise how to fix this problem, we should maintain everything the same
as the original picture when inserting into the database. Much thanks.

it is that you use Oracle util,
when you read image from local disk ,image is translated to Oralce Form Formats!!!
so when you re-write image to local disk ,the size must be change.

Image size reported incorrectly

We have a studio where we shoot 1080p (1920x1080 resolution). When we upload these files into Final Cut Server the Image Size column usually (but not always) reports that the Image Size is 1440x1080. This was really concerning me, but when I export the video back to my computer the original media is still 1920x1080. The poster frame image is also still 1920x1080.
Any ideas why FCS is reporting the incorrect Image Size most of the time?

Philip Hodgetts wrote:
I've been under the impression that DVCPRO HD in 60 Hz countries is 1280x 1080 for nominal "1080" files. In 50 Hz countries it's 1440 x 1080.
Philip
That is indeed correct. Good point. Are you working in 50i, bradleylamar?

Why jpeg file exported from Aperture with 300 dpi's it opens with 72 dpi's on PS ( image size)? I've tried several combinations and all give different results. And I am confused on what is the best workflow for me.

Ok.
My workflow is
RAW > Aperture Library > export jpeg high resolution 300 dpi's > one file on PS > edit > Save us jpeg. The I realised that files from PS were being save in a smaller size from the ones exported form Aperture. That is when I went o see <image size> on PS and files were with 72.
Since ten I've trying different things
1. Aperture > export as PSD > open on PS > edit > Save us jpeg = small file (around 15 MB)
2. Aperture > export as jpeg high resolution 300 dpi's > open on PS > CHANGE dpi's to 300 on <image size> edit > Save us jpeg = big file (Huge, actually)
What am I doing wrong? Would someone give me guidance and tell me what is the best workflow, considering I edit photos to deliver to my clients and I shall give them 300 dpi's.
Thank you

This is a known Aperture issue: Problem with Aperture 3.6 preset exports. | Apple Support Communities
Benjamin

Incorrect images from .indb file export to ePub in Indesign CS6

I am having problems exporting images to ePub and get a different result from the same file depending on whether I export directly from the .indd file or from the .indb file.
When I export to ePub from the individual chapter (.indd) file, everything is fine and the images appear in the correct locations where they have been anchored.
When I export via the book (.indb) file, images are being replaced with the incorrect file in the resulting ePub.
Looking at the HTML, it seems not all images are being exported from the .indb file and when the image is missing, Indesign is substituting the next available image from the alphabetical list in the images folder so I'm getting incorrect images peppered throughout the book.
Any idea where I've gone wrong and how to fix it? I've produced several ePubs with images and never come across this before.
More details on how I've set up the files and any other info I think might be relevant below if needed.
- I'm using Indesign CS6 (8.0.1)
- I'm producing an 11 chapter book.
- Each chapter is a separate .indd file for ease of editing.
- These 11 files have been added to an .indb file for export to ePub.
- Images are all anchored to their captions within the text.
- On Export to ePub settings for images I have selected to insert a page break before the image and that settings apply to anchopred objects.
Nothing else is selected (I don't want to preserve appearance from layout.)
- I'm using the Articles panel feature for order of content.
- In the original file supplied, the images were placed as .tiff images. I saved them to jpeg and relinked them using the "relink to folder" and "match same file but this extension" options.
- No links are flagged as missing.
Any help much appreciated.

The solution points to how, it appears, the book panel export is functioning: each file exports a set of tags referenced to itself; file01 adds a "1" to its tags, and so forth. What I was able to do was use a file referencing all of the tags in the style suite in two ways:
first, I exported to an epub the single file, creating a fairly clean CSS, which I then extracted and renamed;
then, making certain that file was the "source" file in the book panel, I mapped for export all of the tags, being careful to be certain each tag/class combo was same as in renamed clean CSS;
I synchronized the whole shebang;
I exported to epub, adding my clean CSS as an external style sheet, selecting only "include embeddable fonts".
Bingo!

When I export from Lr to CS3 my image size is 8x12 roughly, why?

I shoot RAW with a 5d mark2 I export from lr to cs3 in my workflow. I am wanting to create a gallery wrap at an image size of 24x36, when I go to create my negative space my exported image size from Lr is only 8x12, why would that be? I don't know what to do or how to make my image larger without loosing quality? I have never noticed this before? Why is it doing this now?

It will be the settings in your export menu.
clsmithphoto wrote:
I shoot RAW with a 5d mark2 I export from lr to cs3 in my workflow. I am wanting to create a gallery wrap at an image size of 24x36, when I go to create my negative space my exported image size from Lr is only 8x12, why would that be? I don't know what to do or how to make my image larger without loosing quality? I have never noticed this before? Why is it doing this now?
Check this out for how to export: http://tv.adobe.com/search/?q=exporting

Keep exported image size in HTML as shown in PDF

I have many inline formulas (imported from Word file via using mathtype) in PDF article made by ID. But when I export the articles as HTML, the images for formulas become much larger than shown in PDF version. How can i keep the exported images to the same size as they are shown the PDF file? I know I can edit the html file to specify image size, but that is the ideal work flow.
Thank you.

Hi Eric,
If i'm getting you right. you have the formulas placed as the images.
So, to keep the size fixed, In HTML export Options in image tab keep the image size as fixed.
Snapshot to refer:
Now you have image of same size as it appears in InDesign.

Images sizes are incorrect in CS6

I was working on some images I had previously worked on in LR2. Cropped them to 11 x 14. Exported as DNG and resized to 11 x 14. Opened PS6 Beta and It showed them as approxiamtely 8 x 10??? Went back into LR2 and reset crop to origianl size (shot ona DNikon D300). Exported as original size and opened PS6. Now the size is approximately 9 x 14????
I wnat 11 x 14.
What is going on?
Thanks
Lee

Ok, let me go over step by step what happens.
1) Open file in LR2. Image shot on D300. Size is orignial size.
2) Crop image to 11 x 14
3) Export to folder Export actions set to resize to 11 x 14, DNG format. Should make no change but just in case. at 300 dpi the file size it 10.2 MB now.
4) Open DNG image in PS6.0 on my iMac. Data below image is Adobe RGB, (1998) 16 bit, 2338 by 2975 (7.0MPP) 300DPI
5) Click on Open image with no editing done.
6) Select Iamge Size from toolbar at top. Image size is 2338 pixels by 2975 pixels. Document size is Width = 7.793 inches Height = 9.917 inches Resolution = 300 Pixels/inch. Canvas size is the same. What happened to 11 x 14?
7) Now go to the iMac desktop and copy DNG image to flash drive and move to Windows machine with CS5.0 open in PS 5.0.
8) Now click on Open image with no editing as in PS 6
9) Same results.
When I set crop to 11 x 14 it shows I do a full frame crop, nothing left out.
So PS shows the iamge size (and canvas) size as 7.793 x 9.917 inches (my close to 8 x 10).
Why does it not show 11 x 14? Aslo, if the image size is 7.793 by 9.917, why does a crop set to 11x14 outline the image precisely with nothing cropped out?

Transparency problems when I distort Pdf image size (ie: 100%x99%) then Export. Is there away to fix

I sometimes have transparency problems when I distort PDF image size (i.e.: 100%x99%) then Export. Is there away to fix. Or at least be able to preflight and know I have an issue.

Mostly I have seen borders and drop shadows that will just go away or other wise not print right but only when I distort the image and only on very complicated large PDF images. When I print it at same % both horz and vert. this problem goes away.

Small image size after exporting

Hello,
When I export an image with dimesions of 4214x3371, the image size will show as 1.124x1.405''. This is a problem because I am trying to print my images on a 16x20'' canvas. My resolution is set at 3000ppi and I am exporting RAW files to an uncompressed TIFF file with my color space being ProPhoto RGB.
Any input would be appreciated, this is quite frusterating.

Let's see ... 4214 pixels divided by 3000 pixels per inch is um ... wait where's my calculator ... 1.405 inches!
of course, the whole calculation is meaningless, it has no effect on what gets printed
If you send a picture that is 4214x3371 pixels to be printed at 16x20 ... you ought to get decent prints at about 211 pixels per inch (where did that come from? 4214/20 inches is about 211 pixels per inch)
So, basically, you have enough pixels to do the print. The resolution number in the file is truly meaningless here, if you ignore it and do the math the way I did, you find out you are fine. If you try to interpret this meaningless number, well, you get misled seriously.

WEB module export image size

Team, I am
exporting just two images from the Web Mo
dule...using the basis HTML
gallery template.
The original image size is 4972K (4.9Mb)
After I select export in the web module, the resulting image is around
200K in the content\images\large directory.
I have the "Large Images" Quality slider at 100
Is is the case...that no matter what...the image will be manipulated or reduced in size by the web module engine?
I would like the original image to be exported out to the content\images\large directory.
Is this possible?
I was just on phone with support...close to two hours...disconnected twice...but the phone support folks were not aware of what I am doing.
I am using LR 3.3 in Windows...if that matters.
Thank You,
-Rich O
[email protected]

Rich,
RichO2010 wrote:
Beat, I have not made any adjustments. Not sure where "Image Pages" are. But, under the Web module, I have tried several "Large Images" quality settings under the "Output Settings"
You find this setting under the Appearance section:
I am getting the sense that no matter what...the LR Webgallery engine wants to "optimize" the images for web output.
I just want the people that visit the site, the ability to download the original image...unaltered.
I have not found a way to go beyond 2071 pixels for image width in Web Gallery.
From what i am reading so far, I think I should just let the galley engine do its work. Then come back and upload the original images under the content\images\large (or whatever the output destination might be).
That might be a way to achieve what you want. There might be side-effects regarding borders, watermarks etc.
Beat

Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size

Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size to 7 inches on the long edge. My exported result is 457 dpi and sized at 3200x2134 pixels.. Any ideas on why this is happening and what I can do to correct it?

The DPI setting in a digital image has no meaning at all. You need to learn how to calculate what you need in your exported image. The only measurement in a digital image that has any meaning is the number of pixels in each direction. It doesn't matter what you set that DPI to (actually it's PPI or pixels per inch). The image will have the same number of pixels regardless of the setting. If you need an image that is 5 x 7" (for example) at 200 PPI then you would want an image that measured:
5 x 200 = 1000 pixels
7 x 200 = 1400 pixels
So you would need an image that is 1000 x 1400 pixels to have a 5 x 7" image at 200 PPI. The reason your exported image had such a high PPI setting is because you specified the number of inches you wanted the image to be. And there were enough pixels in the image that it calculated out to be that high PPI setting.
I apologize, I don't explain this very well. But you need to learn to do the math to determine how large you really want your exported images to be.

Export plugin - forcing specific image size

Hi - I'm trying to change the sample FTP upload plugin so that it does not give the user the option of setting an image size but instead forces a maximum height and maximum width of 675 pixels. I've figured out how to hide the 'image settings' option in the export dialog but have gotten nowhere with trying to enforce the image size.
I have added this into FtpUploadServiceProvider.lua but it doesn't work:
    updateExportSettings = function( exportSettings )
    exportSettings.LR_size_maxHeight = 675
    exportSettings.LR_size_maxWidth = 675
    end,
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

I found that I had to schedule a new export session in order to have new export parameters take effect - or I least thats what I did and it worked. I have a web plugin that schedules a separate export for each size: thumbnail, + bigger, ... Dunno if there's a better way.
Rob

LR5.3 incorrect image size export

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for