LRT224 Dual Wan - Opening up Ports

Hello,
I am installing a new VoIP system on our network and the company advises us that we need to open UDP Ports 10000-60000 and TCP port 80 and 443. I believe TCP Ports 80 and 443 are already open according to the test I have run but I need to open the UDP Ports. 
Can anyone advise me how to do this? We have roughly 8 computers on the network and I need to open the ports for all computers. 
Thanks

That sound right.
In your One to One Nat set your Private Range Begin to something like 192.168.1.50 and the Range Length to number of phones. Remember that you don't include IP addresses in use by WAN ports in Public Range Begin.
Use IP & MAC binding to assign the IP addresses to the workstations.
In this case you might not have to open ports because of the One to One NAT I'm not sure.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Similar Messages

  • Lrt224 dual wan router

    Hi im new in dual wan setup. Please help.
    Heres my problem
    Wan 1 dynamic globe telecom primary
    Wan 2 static pldt telecom
    Link failover mode
    1 router is plug in to lrt224 to serve wifi and my switch also plugin to the wireless wifi
    1 cctv dvr connected to lrt224 port 9000 webport 9100 with auto detect settings setup
    Now:
    Sometime cctv camera broadcast to public ip when switch to wan2 but sometimes cant show also
    Same way around with dynamic wan 1 as primary
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Thanks Guys, its a big help.......

  • LRT224 - Dual WAN port forwarding

    Can you forward say port 80 from WAN 1 to IP and port 80 from WAN 2 to a different IP.?
    Also can you somehow select TCP & UDP instead off just one or the other?
    I just replaced 2 TPLink routers with LRT 214 & LRT 224 its all working well. Except the port forwarding
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    With LRT224, a port forwarding rule is applied to both WAN ports, and two rules are required if you want to forward TCP and UDP to the same internal IP.

  • LRT224 and Spotify/port forwarding on dual WAN set-up.

    Very pleased with the  LRT224, which was easy to set up (dual WAN, one cable modem, one VDSL). I'm using it for a small home-based business with several PC's, and it's worked a dream in the load-balancing mode.  My request is beyond my current technical knowledge, however: we have Spotify on one PC for "background entertainment". It's a total bandwidth-hog, so I'd like to set it up to use the slower of the two WANs (VDSL) only.  I'm something of a newbie to the techniques of port forwarding, so I'd be really grateful if someone could describe the steps to bond all Spotify inbound/outbound traffic to WAN2. Is this even possible...?  Thanks in advance - Steve

    You can define a specific IP addresses or specific application service ports to go through a user-assigned WAN for external connections via Protocol Binding. Just bind the MAC address of your device to an IP address to properly route traffic to the specific device by IP and MAC binding.

  • Simplest dual-WAN setup for LRT224 ?

    Hi folks
    Hope someone can help with some insight / advice here.
    First, some background :
    For a while I’ve been using a conventional ADSL modem-router device to connect to my primary ISP, and thereby provide internet connectivity to a number of desktop PCs, laptops and other mobile devices in a small office environment. I plug the “output” (LAN port) of the ADSL modem-router into a switch, and I also plug a dual-band wireless access point (WAP) into the switch to provide wireless access for the mobile devices. Generally this all works fine.
    One problem of course is that if/when my ISP goes down - which does happen occasionally - I have no internet. Also, I am starting to need extra bandwidth, and ADSL connectivity has pretty much reached its speed ceiling in my area. So I’ve been looking at ways of providing redundancy and higher speed by having multiple connections, possibly with different technologies and different ISPs. One option is to go with multiple ADSL connections; another (perhaps better) option is to go with a high-speed fixed-wireless (LTE) connection. With LTE, I can easily get over 30Mbps, so I’ve gone with that option for now. FTTH may be an option on the future. Obviously I needed a 2- or 3-WAN router device to do the connection management.
    I had a preference for a dual-WAN router that isn’t tied to any particular communication technology (like ADSL, or VDSL) to give a degree of future-proofing for new technologies like FTTH. I prefer modem devices that have a conventional ethernet port as an output, and hence router devices that have ethernet ports for WAN inputs. This eliminates “combined” devices like Draytek’s “Vigor” ADSL+WAN modem-routers, or routers that have provision to connect a USB 3G stick modem for failover. 
    While shopping around, I looked at options like the Cisco RV042/043, the Peplink Balance 20/30, and the Belkin/Linksys LRT224. The LRT224 seemed to offer a reasonable compromise between price, features and performance, so I went with it.
    Both my CPE devices are combined modem-routers that completely manage the connection to their respective ISPs, presenting me simply with an ethernet port (or ports) for connection to my local LAN. Specifically, I’m using a D-Link DSL-2500U ADSL modem (1 LAN port) and a Huawei B593s-601 LTE modem (4 LAN ports). Both include the usual functions such as DHCP server, NAT, firewall etc. Previously I’d always give the ADSL modem a fixed IP, and then it let it handle DHCP for the whole of the downstream network. So far, so good.
    My requirements for now are pretty straightforward :
    - Simple failover operation, ie if one ISP (WAN) goes down, the router should transparently and quickly re-route traffic to the other ISP.
    - Load-balancing, ie the ability to apportion traffic between the two ISPs according to a number of different algorithms. Ideally I would want to see options like : equal traffic (bytes) per ISP, % traffic split (eg 60:40), pro-rata split based on connection speed or latency, etc etc ..
    - Ability to log into the ‘Web control panel for any of the three devices (LTE modem, ADSL mode, or dual-WAN router) directly from the office LAN without unplugging or re-cabling anything.
    - I've no need to use the VPN functionality on the LRT224 at the moment, though that might come later.
    Here’s where I need some input and help :
    So far, the only way I’ve been able to get this all to work together is as follows :
    1) Set up the ADSL modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.1.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.1.50/149.
    2) Set up the LTE modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.2.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.2.50/149.
    3) Set up the LRT224 to get WAN-side IP’s from the upstream devices on both WAN1 and WAN2.
    4) Set the LRT224 in “Gateway” mode.
    5) Set up the LRT224 with a fixed IP of 192.168.0.1, and to issue downstream DHCP IP addresses in the range 192.168.0.50/149.
     What I've noticed in trying to get this all to work is the following:
    6) This only works (and gives visibility of all 3 devices) when the two modem devices are on different subnets (like 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x). Trying to put them both on the same subnet as the downstream side (all on 192.168.0.x) just doesn't work, or one device is not visible.
    7) This only works with the LRT224 in "Gateway" mode, even though "Router" mode seems more fitting.
    The setup given above (1 through 5) does work, and gives a situation like the following :
    Failover works OK, and I can see any of the three edvices from the office LAN by connecting to any of the assigned IPs.
    However, the problem is that the throughput really sucks.
    If I connect the LTE modem (only) direct into the office LAN, I get in excess of 20Mbps downlink speed. However, when connecting via the LRT224, I don't even get half that speed, even if the LRT224 is in simple failover mode and the ADSL modem is turned off or out of the picture.
    Given that the LRT224 isn't "processing" the packets at all, and there's no VPN overhead, I find it hard to understand why it sucks up over 50% of the throughput. Also, the reviews I read on the LRT224 listed throughputs in the hundreds of Mbps, so this really shouldn't even be a factor. Also, having the LRT224 eat half the throughput partly defeats the one object (higher speed).
    So my question is : Is the above setup really the way to do what I want ? Or is there a better way ? The upstream arrangements with dual DHCP on different subnets seems overly complex. Is there a simpler way with PPoE, or PPTP, etc ?
    What might I be doing wrong ?
    Any input or advice would be much appreciated.
    Thanks

    Thanks for the suggestions, guys; although I've pretty much covered all of those things.
    For info :
    1) The router came with firmware v1.0.0.9 (Nov 25, 2013 - the initial release), but I have updated it to the latest v1.0.2.06 (Mar 28, 2014). (This is the third release in 4 months, so it seems Linksys is working fairly actively on LRT2x4 firmware).
    2) I have the "Maximum Bandwidth" figures (reached at Configuration / System Management / Bandwidth Management) set to the appropriate values, including a maximum downstream value of 61 440kbps (60Mbps) for the WAN port to which the LTE modem is connected. My understanding, though, is that the LRT224 doesn't DO anything with this information unless there are one or more bandwidth management policies set. (My understanding may be wrong, and the manual isn't much help). I have no bandwidth management policies set.
    3) I did try disabling all of the firewall rules as suggested by Flybyknight - no improvement.
    One interesting (and unintended / undesired) consequence of my setup is that I can only "see" the configuration pages (web interfaces) for both upstream modems (ADSL and LTE) when the router is in "Load Balance" mode. If it is in "Failover" mode and the primary WAN is up, then I can't see the modem on the secondary (failover) WAN. I assume this is because traffic is only being routed to the active WAN port.
    I guess my uncertainty is more about the upstream setup, ie the way in which the upsream-facing WAN ports on the LRT are configured to talk to the downstream-facing LAN ports on the respective modems.
    The user guide for the LRT224 is really poor, unfortunately. It doesn't explain the actual workings of the various features at all. For instance, it does not explain what the ACTUAL working of "load balance" is. Does the device route the same amount of traffic (bytes) to both WAN ports, or does it do so in proportion to their configured speeds ? Proper explanations for these features are really indispensable! Belkin/Linksys, are you listening ??

  • Dual Wan and port routing

    Hi,
    I am setting up a configuration with SA520W and 2 Wan, in load balancing. But I face a problem that I could not understand.
    Traffic is HTTP, SIP and 2 servers.
    Servers are for a VPN tunnel and a mail server with ActiveSync
    Both services absolutely need port 443 on the external IP, and that's one of the dual wan reason.
    The 2 wan are running, load balancing mode is enable and NAt routing in firewall tab as follow :
    443  Enabled     WAN     LAN     ALU_OpenVPN     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.150     WAN1     Always    
    443   Enabled     WAN     LAN     ActiveSync     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN2     Always 
    If load balanced
    Port 443 is NOT routed from wan1 to 192.168.0.150
    Port 443 is routed from wan2 to 192.168.0.254
    If only WAN 1
    Port 443 is routed  from wan1 to 192.168.0.150
    If only WAN 2
    Port 443 is routed  from wan2 to 192.168.0.254
    In fact I did other testing and no port routing with WAN1 when load balancing is enable, even on port that is not used at all on Wan2.
    With a FTP filezilla server, it's OK if on wan2, and it stop before logging if on a wan1 (on laod balancing, ok on both case if only one wan)
    Firmware : latest 2.1.18
    Any Clue ??

    Hello,
    I confirm, there is a strange behaviour.
    Simple test :
    Dual Wan configured.
    A FTP server on the LAN (192.168.0.254) port 21
    Firewall , ipv4 config :
    WAN   to   LAN     FTP     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN1
    WAN   to   LAN     FTP     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN2
    Then some testing using a FTP client outside the LAN, connection from Internet.
    Then, changing ONLY the Wan Mode :
    1/ Use only single WAN port : Dedicated WAN
    ==> FTP connect through WAN1
    2/ Use only single WAN port : Optional WAN
    ==>FTP connect through WAN2
    3/ Load Balancing
    ==>FTP connect through WAN1
    ==>FTP DO NOT connect through WAN1
    Is that a bug or do I have some strange stuff somewhere ?
    I will pick up another SA520W from stock, brand new, update the firmware, configure the 2 WAN (invering the 2 provider just in case) and do the same test.

  • RV325 dual wan port forwarding

    RV325 firmware v1.1.1.19
    Each WAN has 1 static IP
    Can I forward different ports from WAN1 to different internal IP's?  
    The manual says there should be "interface" selection but the on port forward config but all I have is "service", "IP" and "status". 
    What I am trying to do is:
    WAN1:80 --> internal 10.0.0.101:80
    WAN1:10000 --> internal 10.0.0.162:10000
    WAN2:80 --> internal 10.0.0.102:80
    WAN2:10000 --> internal 10.0.0.253:10000

    What mpyhala posted is correct. Under the access rules you are actually able to select an interface.
    Unfortunately, it won't help you in regards to the port forwarding configuration you are trying to setup.
    On this router, you open the ports using port forwarding. You can configure access rules and select the right interface but it will not open any ports.

  • RV042 can't open any port!

    Hello,
    I have a RV042 Dual Wan. Two internets balanced wow! who would've thought that the headaches were waiting patiently right down the corner.
    I was working with a 2wire Gateway that came with my ISP. I was able to open the ports in order to have public access for my students and teachers to upload their work. All I had to do was to allow my server ip address to have access to different ports blocked by the ISP. I used
    http://www.canyouseeme.org/ in order to verify if my port was open.
    I bought the RV042 for various reasons like excellent content blocking, load balancing, quick vpn, among other. But I just can't open the port 80 while having having my two ISP connected with load balancing, not even while having only one modem connected.
    I have resolved many issues using the protocol binding. I have tried everthing. I just don't undertand something.
    Whenever I connect my server to my old router, "www.canyouseeme.org" tells me that my port 80 is open.
    Whenever I connect my servet to the RV042-DW, my port appears closed.
    So it's not any OS issues. 
    I've tried:
    - To forward the TCP 80~80 port to my server static ip address... but failed
    - To enable UPnP function with the same port... but failed
    - To configure the port triggering with the same port.. but failed.
    - To disable the firewall.. but failed.
    - To use transparent bridge in the WAN1 with my 2wire Gateway... but failed
    - To set up an account in DNS.ORG already had one, everythings is in green.. but failed.
    - To change the configuration in my old 2Wire Gateway router to allow a DMZ zone so all ports are public... but failed.
    - To assign RV042 router ip address in my old 2Wire allowing that specific address to allow certain ports to be public... but failed.
    I have the  Firmware v4.0.4.02 from DEC/11
    HELP!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TU7JjJJZi1Q

    Which leads us to the second preoccupation. If I can't make port 80, or port 21 to be public then could i set a QuickVPN successfully?
    Is it possible to bridge a RV042 Dual Wan to a RV042 V3 Dual Wan to bring 3 ISP's downstream loading balance into 4 outputs.?
    First Router
    1st ISP  = 2Wire Gateway 1Mbps Down , 0.5Mpbs Up
    2nd ISP = Same as 1st
    Second Router
    3rd ISP = Dedicated Internet access 2Mbps UP and DN
    Would that produce a 3Mpbs Down, 2.5Mpbs up?

  • I have a 2T apple time capsule and router. I bought a Hauppauge WinTV extender which allows regular TV to be broadcasted on a PC. The program allows streaming to a Mac or iPad, iPhone, etc. I need to open a port on the router to allow this to work.

    I have a 2T apple time capsule and router. I bought a Hauppauge Win TV extender which allows TV to be broadcasted on a PC. The program allows for the TV to be streamed on a Mac, Iphone, Ipad. I need to access the router set up options to open a port on the router to allow this program to stream the TV to the Mac and Iphone. I do not know how to access the apple time capsule router to change the settings to open a port on the router. help please.

    Firstly you do not need to open ports to stream locally.. there is no port block in local LAN.. only WAN to LAN. So there is a good chance it is not needed at all..
    Opening ports on the TC I strongly recommend a v5 airport utility.. you can download one for windows if you don't have a Mac.. iOS version of the utility I am not sure but it will not work to do complex things.
    In the v5 utility go to the NAT area, and click on port mappings.
    Sorry I don't have a screen shot at the moment of the actual mapping page.. but simply put the IP of the device you want opened and the port.
    There are plenty of posts with this info if you google.
    But as noted.. this is purely WAN to LAN.. nothing else.

  • VPN and a Dual Wan router confusion

    I am running a Border Manager 3.9 server with a Dual Wan router supplying the 2 ISPs load balancing to a single NIC on the Border Manager Server. I want to try setting up a VPN.
    Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
    Just wondering,
    [email protected]

    In article <[email protected]>, Rlmillies wrote:
    > Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
    >
    Hah! Well, inbound traffic in general can be problematical on a
    dual-wan system.
    Here you have two issues, if the router is like ones I've worked on.
    First, load balancing. You can't (probably - this is based on my
    experience) set up a static NAT of one of the public IP addresses to
    the BM 'public' address and still load balance. My experience is that
    as soon as you do that, it forces both inbound and outbound traffic
    onto that particular WAN link, so it kills load balancing/failover.
    Which means you need to do port forwarding on the router for all the
    VPN ports. You will need TCP and UPD 353, and UPD 500 and 4500 inbound
    (and replies outbound). If using a site-site VPN, you also need TCP
    213 inbound.
    You will have to configure the VPN address in BMgr to use one of the
    WAN public IP's. The VPN will only work on that one WAN link.
    Craig Johnson
    Novell Support Connection SysOp
    *** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
    BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

  • How to open a port on firewall

    I have a RV110W firewall installed. Now behind this firewall there is a server running. I need to access this server from outside of the store through a specific TCP port.
    Physical connection from outside to the server is like this.
    Outside -> Router -> Firewall -> Server
    Router IP: 192.168.1.1
    Firewall WAN IP: 192.168.1.5
    Firewall LAN IP: 192.168.2.1
    Firewall Gateway IP: 192.1681.1
    Server IP: 192.168.2.10
    The firewall is in gateway mode.
    Now I forwarded a TCP port on router to firewall (192.168.1.5) and on the firewall i forwarded the same port to server (192.168.2.10).
    On the server system, i opened the port on windows firewall for inbound.
    This there anything I am missing?

    Hello
    your steps seems to be fine at first look, but somewhere in that chain there is probably something broken.
    what kind of service is on that server port?
    are you able to open connection from outside with telnet to Router WAN IP and port? example test from outside/internet:
    telnet X.X.X.X YYYY
    where X.X.X.X is WAN IP of Router and YYYY is port number.
    You can confirm that port forwarding is working on both devices:
    you can try to connect with computer between Router and Firewall and try that port on firewall.
    if previous test works, then for testing purposes move server to subnet between Router and Firewall and perform connectivity test from internet.

  • Trend Micro Dual WAN Issue

    Question from a partner:
    Has Trend fixed the hosted issue with two WAN connections?  It used to be that even though your device had dual WANs, Trend would only forward the emails to one of the connections.  If it went down, you had to submit an email request to move it to the other connection and it could be 12-24 hours before it went into effect and 99 times out of 100, the original WAN port would be back online.  It does slightly defeat the purpose of having Dual WANs if you cannot receive email in this day and age.
    Any help out there?
    Art

    I got with Trend on this because I thought it was something very interesting....
    here is what they said...
    I think  you’re talking about the same setup as a customer having 2 mail servers, right?  If so we have had a solution for this for a while.
    They  want us to send email to 1.1.1.1, but if that is down, send it to  2.2.2.2.
    They  would use the MX record method.
    A  customer would need to create a hostname that points to two MX  records.
    Give the  primary site IN MX 10 and the backup IN MX 20.
    Then we  change the IMHS configuration to use the hostname they  created.
    >cat  imhs.multiple.customer.mailservers
    Hello,
    Our  postfix servers will only allow us to configure 1 IP address or 1 hostname in  our transport file to deliver email back to the customer.  If the customer has 2  or more mail servers they want us to use, they will need to create a new  hostname DNS entry and point it to their multiple servers.
    If they  want our servers to try to deliver the email to their mail servers in a specific  order, say mailserver1 and if that server is not available then try to deliver  the email to the mailserver2, then they would need to setup the following DNS  entries as an example:
    mailserver1.customerdomain.com.    IN  A  1.2.3.4
    mailserver2.customerdomain.com.    IN  A  2.3.4.5
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN MX 10 mailserver1.customerdomain.com.
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN MX 20 mailserver2.customerdomain.com.
    Then we  setup our server to deliver to  imhs.customerdomain.com.
    customerdomain.com     smtp:imhs.customerdomain.com:25
    If a  specific order is not important then they can just make imhs.customerdomain.com  point to multiple IP addresses:
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN A 1.2.3.4
    imhs.customerdomain.com.   IN A 1.2.3.5
    This  will make our server send an email to 1.2.3.4 and the next email to 1.2.3.5,  then to 1.2.3.4, etc.
    Then we  setup our server to deliver to  imhs.customerdomain.com.
    customerdomain.com     smtp:[imhs.customerdomain.com]:25
    Our  servers will only deliver the email to the first server that will accept the  email.  They will not deliver the same email to both mail  servers.
    I hope  that is detail enough,
    Regards,
    Nosa

  • Dual WAN and Log mail SMTP on RV082 ?

    I use a RV082 with dual Wan and I cannot configure two SMTP.
    Without authentication; a SMTP is specific of the provider.
    When WAN1 comes down, SMTP to be used is the SMTP corresponding to WAN2 and vice versa.
    Implementation of authentication with the mail server wil be useful.
    Possibility of two mail servers with indication of the corresponding WAN is also useful.

    I don't know how or if it's possible to set up two SMTP servers, but I know that may ISPs block SMTP traffic that is not directed to one of their SMTP servers.  You could try picking just one SMTP server, and find out if it can be conacted on a non-standard port.  A lot of SMTP providers allow for this.
    If you can configure a single SMTP server on a non-standard port, you should be able to conatct that SMTP server from anywhere on the internet because the traffic won't be blocked (at least not port-based blocking, which is what most ISPs use).
    So in a scenario where WAN1 is the ISP who owns the SMTP server and WAN2 is a diferent ISP that blocks standard SMTP traffic...
    1) If both WANs are working, SMTP traffic goes out WAN1.  No problem.
    2) If only WAN1 is working, SMTP traffic goes out WAN1.  No problem.
    3) If only WAN2 is working, SMTP traffic goes out WAN2, but is not blocked because it is on a non-standard port.  No problem.
    I hope that helps.

  • Linksys EA3500 and QSee CCTV DVR, can't open any ports

    Hi everybody,
    I just set up everything, and I am able to view the cameras from inside the network, but when trying to view them from outside it appears offline.
    I have tried to follow all the guides to open ports, tried 80,81,85, 6039 etc but canyouseeme always tels me that the ports timed out. I enabled DMZ for the specific MAC address of the dvr also.
    I'm going crazy!
    Is there anything I am doing wrong?

    Are you using the Linksys smart wifi feature or just the classic page? If you are using the Linksys smart wifi page then you can use this article: How to set up port forwarding on the Linksys Smart Wi-Fi Router using the local access interface
    If you are using the classic Linksys page then you can use this article:
    Setting up single Port Forwarding on Linksys Wi-Fi Routers and Smart Wi-Fi Routers
    Make sure to disable the filter anonymous internet request under security tab of the router.
    Make sure to get public ip or wan ip on the router’s status page.
    The ports 81, 85, 6039 and other camera related port numbers should be open behind your modem. If they are blocked by your ISP then you have to ask them to open these ports. You can use this port checker ping.eu to verify if the port is really open. Once all ports are open for your camera, then you should be able to access it remotely.

  • RV082 used dual wan download speed slow

    Hi
      I have a RV082 and I used dual wan , every ISP downstream is 10MB/s. two ISP downstream total 20Mb/s.Rv082 use loadblance mode,but total Lan PC download speed was 30kb/s-90kb/s,is very slowly .I find similar question inthe forum ,but i can not .please help me
      thanks

    Ok, several things here:
    - Make sure that when you connect every individual LAN you get the full downstream speed.
    - Make sure that it is not a PC problem, check with different PC's to see if the speed is the same on all of them.
    - Download latest version of Firmware, you can get it from the cisco website, here is the link: http://tools.cisco.com/support/downloads/go/PlatformList.x?sftType=Small+Business+Router+Firmware&mdfid=282414011&treeName=&mdfLevel=null&url=null&modelName=Cisco+RV082+8-port+10%2F100+VPN+Router+-+Dual+WAN&isPlatform=N&treeMdfId=&modifmdfid=null&imname=&hybrid=Y&imst=N
    - If you have to apply the new firmware make sure that you reste the device to factory defaults aftre the upgrade.
    - Disable SPI under the firewall settings.
    Hope this helps.

Maybe you are looking for