Lrt224 dual wan router

Hi im new in dual wan setup. Please help.
Heres my problem
Wan 1 dynamic globe telecom primary
Wan 2 static pldt telecom
Link failover mode
1 router is plug in to lrt224 to serve wifi and my switch also plugin to the wireless wifi
1 cctv dvr connected to lrt224 port 9000 webport 9100 with auto detect settings setup
Now:
Sometime cctv camera broadcast to public ip when switch to wan2 but sometimes cant show also
Same way around with dynamic wan 1 as primary
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks Guys, its a big help.......

Similar Messages

VPN and a Dual Wan router confusion

I am running a Border Manager 3.9 server with a Dual Wan router supplying the 2 ISPs load balancing to a single NIC on the Border Manager Server. I want to try setting up a VPN.
Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
Just wondering,
[email protected]

In article <[email protected]>, Rlmillies wrote:
> Whats the easiest most pain free way of doing this?
>
Hah! Well, inbound traffic in general can be problematical on a
dual-wan system.
Here you have two issues, if the router is like ones I've worked on.
First, load balancing. You can't (probably - this is based on my
experience) set up a static NAT of one of the public IP addresses to
the BM 'public' address and still load balance. My experience is that
as soon as you do that, it forces both inbound and outbound traffic
onto that particular WAN link, so it kills load balancing/failover.
Which means you need to do port forwarding on the router for all the
VPN ports. You will need TCP and UPD 353, and UPD 500 and 4500 inbound
(and replies outbound). If using a site-site VPN, you also need TCP
213 inbound.
You will have to configure the VPN address in BMgr to use one of the
WAN public IP's. The VPN will only work on that one WAN link.
Craig Johnson
Novell Support Connection SysOp
*** For a current patch list, tips, handy files and books on
BorderManager, go to http://www.craigjconsulting.com ***

RV325 Dual WAN Router - Use only one IP

I have a rv325 dual wan router. I have setup load balancing on the router, but I don't want one of the servers here being load balanced. How do i set it to only use a specific WAN while everything else is load balanced?

Michael,
I like to share link that will has a step by step screenshots on how to configure protocol binding. Your source ip will be server and Destination is whichever WAN you are shaping that traffic. Hope this helps
Article ID: 4242
http://sbkb.cisco.com

Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router USB setup with Telstra 4G MF823

I am trying to setup Cisco RV320 DUAL WAN router to work with my prepaid Telstra 4G MF823 device. Could you please assist. My settings are as follows: InterfaceUSB2Connection Type:3G/4G PIN Code:Confirm PIN Code:USB Connection Status:3G/4G modem is not available.Access Point Name:telstra.internetDial Number:Username:Password:Enable DNSDNS Server (Required): 8.8.8.8DNS Server (Optional): 8.8.4.4MTU:AutoManualB

Hi oz000,
Unfortunately we don't have anyone here to assist with this particular issue. Our team here provides assistance for the device standalone, we ensure that the 4G device connects to the network and functions correctly on its own.
-Matt W

Windows server with dual wan router

Hello, I have a doubtful scenario to be addressed. We had our 2008 server running on a single internet connection, but since its not reliable and has down time we planned to get another one. We also bought a
DUAL WAN Router so that we get some of the IPs without the group policy applied for testing purposes. So if we run a DHCP
server on the router instead of the Windows 2008 server, will it work? We need one internet connection as the main connection and the other as standby for continous internet access.

Guys,
This is getting difficult to follow the conversation. Let me try to clarify,..this is way way simpler than what it is being made (as far as I can interpret the situation).
1. The dual WAN is completely irrelevant to the situation. It could easily be a single WAN (single ISP) and it wouldn't make any difference.
2. The WAN Device is the "Firewall",...meaning it is the NAT device,..and the only NAT Device
3. There is no VPN,...but if there were the VPN would have to be performed by the WAN Device, meaning that you would have had to purchased one capable of such.
4. The private LAN, as far as I can tell from what I read, is a single subnet "flat" network. Hence there is no router, none, zero,...and there should not be.
5. The result of #3 and #4 mean that RRAS should not be enabled on any server on the LAN anywhere.
6. DHCP needs to be, or at least it is best to be, "Active Directory Aware". Therefore it should be run on the Domain Controller. The WAN Device should have Client serving DHCP completely disable.
7. Group Policy is applied to an OU. If a machine account is in such OU then the policy will be applied, if the machine account is not in the OU then it will not be applied. GPOs should be applied to specific OUs,...not at the "root" of the tree.
The only policies that should be applied at the "root" are the Default Domain Policy and the Default Domain Controller Policy,..and those should never be touched and left at their "default" so that you have a place to return to if GPO things go badly.
Do not leave objects within the Default Containers (Computers, USers, etc). Always create one or more OUs (you can even nest them), move the objects into them, and Link (apply) the GPOs at that level.
Hope this helps clarify things.
Phil

OS X Server as a Dual WAN Router

Hello.
I am studying a way to use a Mac Mini with Snow Leopard Server as a Gateway for our network (about 20-30 clients). I know I can use a USB NIC as a 2nd interface to the internet. I wonder if I could use 2 USB NICs to simulate a 2 WAN router. Could it work for load balance? I have 2 ISPs and my router (Hotbrick) has just died.
So my config would be: 2 USB NICs to handle the 2 ISPs connections and the integrated NIC to connect to my internal network.
As I have very little experience on MAC OS X server, I ask if I could this way have NAT, Firewall, Load Balance and VPN services.
Thanks in advance.

There's no inherent load balancing option within Mac OS X, so using Mac OS X to load balance multiple upstream WAN links is going to be tricky, for sure.
There are ways of doing it, but it's far outside of the box, and I wouldn't recommend it, especially if you're new to using Mac OS X Server.

LRT224 - Dual WAN port forwarding

Can you forward say port 80 from WAN 1 to IP and port 80 from WAN 2 to a different IP.?
Also can you somehow select TCP & UDP instead off just one or the other?
I just replaced 2 TPLink routers with LRT 214 & LRT 224 its all working well. Except the port forwarding
Solved!
Go to Solution.

With LRT224, a port forwarding rule is applied to both WAN ports, and two rules are required if you want to forward TCP and UDP to the same internal IP.

LRT224 Dual Wan - Opening up Ports

Hello,
I am installing a new VoIP system on our network and the company advises us that we need to open UDP Ports 10000-60000 and TCP port 80 and 443. I believe TCP Ports 80 and 443 are already open according to the test I have run but I need to open the UDP Ports.
Can anyone advise me how to do this? We have roughly 8 computers on the network and I need to open the ports for all computers.
Thanks

That sound right.
In your One to One Nat set your Private Range Begin to something like 192.168.1.50 and the Range Length to number of phones. Remember that you don't include IP addresses in use by WAN ports in Public Range Begin.
Use IP & MAC binding to assign the IP addresses to the workstations.
In this case you might not have to open ports because of the One to One NAT I'm not sure.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Simplest dual-WAN setup for LRT224 ?

Hi folks
Hope someone can help with some insight / advice here.
First, some background :
For a while I’ve been using a conventional ADSL modem-router device to connect to my primary ISP, and thereby provide internet connectivity to a number of desktop PCs, laptops and other mobile devices in a small office environment. I plug the “output” (LAN port) of the ADSL modem-router into a switch, and I also plug a dual-band wireless access point (WAP) into the switch to provide wireless access for the mobile devices. Generally this all works fine.
One problem of course is that if/when my ISP goes down - which does happen occasionally - I have no internet. Also, I am starting to need extra bandwidth, and ADSL connectivity has pretty much reached its speed ceiling in my area. So I’ve been looking at ways of providing redundancy and higher speed by having multiple connections, possibly with different technologies and different ISPs. One option is to go with multiple ADSL connections; another (perhaps better) option is to go with a high-speed fixed-wireless (LTE) connection. With LTE, I can easily get over 30Mbps, so I’ve gone with that option for now. FTTH may be an option on the future. Obviously I needed a 2- or 3-WAN router device to do the connection management.
I had a preference for a dual-WAN router that isn’t tied to any particular communication technology (like ADSL, or VDSL) to give a degree of future-proofing for new technologies like FTTH. I prefer modem devices that have a conventional ethernet port as an output, and hence router devices that have ethernet ports for WAN inputs. This eliminates “combined” devices like Draytek’s “Vigor” ADSL+WAN modem-routers, or routers that have provision to connect a USB 3G stick modem for failover.
While shopping around, I looked at options like the Cisco RV042/043, the Peplink Balance 20/30, and the Belkin/Linksys LRT224. The LRT224 seemed to offer a reasonable compromise between price, features and performance, so I went with it.
Both my CPE devices are combined modem-routers that completely manage the connection to their respective ISPs, presenting me simply with an ethernet port (or ports) for connection to my local LAN. Specifically, I’m using a D-Link DSL-2500U ADSL modem (1 LAN port) and a Huawei B593s-601 LTE modem (4 LAN ports). Both include the usual functions such as DHCP server, NAT, firewall etc. Previously I’d always give the ADSL modem a fixed IP, and then it let it handle DHCP for the whole of the downstream network. So far, so good.
My requirements for now are pretty straightforward :
- Simple failover operation, ie if one ISP (WAN) goes down, the router should transparently and quickly re-route traffic to the other ISP.
- Load-balancing, ie the ability to apportion traffic between the two ISPs according to a number of different algorithms. Ideally I would want to see options like : equal traffic (bytes) per ISP, % traffic split (eg 60:40), pro-rata split based on connection speed or latency, etc etc ..
- Ability to log into the ‘Web control panel for any of the three devices (LTE modem, ADSL mode, or dual-WAN router) directly from the office LAN without unplugging or re-cabling anything.
- I've no need to use the VPN functionality on the LRT224 at the moment, though that might come later.
Here’s where I need some input and help :
So far, the only way I’ve been able to get this all to work together is as follows :
1) Set up the ADSL modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.1.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.1.50/149.
2) Set up the LTE modem with a fixed IP of 192.168.2.1 and let it do DHCP on a range like 192.168.2.50/149.
3) Set up the LRT224 to get WAN-side IP’s from the upstream devices on both WAN1 and WAN2.
4) Set the LRT224 in “Gateway” mode.
5) Set up the LRT224 with a fixed IP of 192.168.0.1, and to issue downstream DHCP IP addresses in the range 192.168.0.50/149.
What I've noticed in trying to get this all to work is the following:
6) This only works (and gives visibility of all 3 devices) when the two modem devices are on different subnets (like 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x). Trying to put them both on the same subnet as the downstream side (all on 192.168.0.x) just doesn't work, or one device is not visible.
7) This only works with the LRT224 in "Gateway" mode, even though "Router" mode seems more fitting.
The setup given above (1 through 5) does work, and gives a situation like the following :
Failover works OK, and I can see any of the three edvices from the office LAN by connecting to any of the assigned IPs.
However, the problem is that the throughput really sucks.
If I connect the LTE modem (only) direct into the office LAN, I get in excess of 20Mbps downlink speed. However, when connecting via the LRT224, I don't even get half that speed, even if the LRT224 is in simple failover mode and the ADSL modem is turned off or out of the picture.
Given that the LRT224 isn't "processing" the packets at all, and there's no VPN overhead, I find it hard to understand why it sucks up over 50% of the throughput. Also, the reviews I read on the LRT224 listed throughputs in the hundreds of Mbps, so this really shouldn't even be a factor. Also, having the LRT224 eat half the throughput partly defeats the one object (higher speed).
So my question is : Is the above setup really the way to do what I want ? Or is there a better way ? The upstream arrangements with dual DHCP on different subnets seems overly complex. Is there a simpler way with PPoE, or PPTP, etc ?
What might I be doing wrong ?
Any input or advice would be much appreciated.
Thanks

Thanks for the suggestions, guys; although I've pretty much covered all of those things.
For info :
1) The router came with firmware v1.0.0.9 (Nov 25, 2013 - the initial release), but I have updated it to the latest v1.0.2.06 (Mar 28, 2014). (This is the third release in 4 months, so it seems Linksys is working fairly actively on LRT2x4 firmware).
2) I have the "Maximum Bandwidth" figures (reached at Configuration / System Management / Bandwidth Management) set to the appropriate values, including a maximum downstream value of 61 440kbps (60Mbps) for the WAN port to which the LTE modem is connected. My understanding, though, is that the LRT224 doesn't DO anything with this information unless there are one or more bandwidth management policies set. (My understanding may be wrong, and the manual isn't much help). I have no bandwidth management policies set.
3) I did try disabling all of the firewall rules as suggested by Flybyknight - no improvement.
One interesting (and unintended / undesired) consequence of my setup is that I can only "see" the configuration pages (web interfaces) for both upstream modems (ADSL and LTE) when the router is in "Load Balance" mode. If it is in "Failover" mode and the primary WAN is up, then I can't see the modem on the secondary (failover) WAN. I assume this is because traffic is only being routed to the active WAN port.
I guess my uncertainty is more about the upstream setup, ie the way in which the upsream-facing WAN ports on the LRT are configured to talk to the downstream-facing LAN ports on the respective modems.
The user guide for the LRT224 is really poor, unfortunately. It doesn't explain the actual workings of the various features at all. For instance, it does not explain what the ACTUAL working of "load balance" is. Does the device route the same amount of traffic (bytes) to both WAN ports, or does it do so in proportion to their configured speeds ? Proper explanations for these features are really indispensable! Belkin/Linksys, are you listening ??

RV320 - Dual WAN - Load Balance Problem

Hi all,
I've just bought a RV320 Dual WAN router an try to get it running. My network setup looks lice the picture attached.
I have 2 WAN Connections:
- Router 1 (16Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - no public WAN IP
- Router 2 (3 Mbit Down / 512kbit up) - Fixed public IP
Router 1 ist connected to WAN1 and router 2 to WAN2 port on the RV320.
I have enabled load balancing mode.
Qustions:
1.
I want WAN1 to be the primary line to be used until capacity reached.
Currently for some reason I don't understand the cisco always uses WAN2.
That's not good as all browsing and downloading is limited to 3mbit.
When I switch to "fail-over" mode and set primry live to WAN1 that works, but WAN2 is not kept alive.
2.
I am using VOIP and need to route all VOIP traffic to WAN2 interface.
The best would be to tell the router IP 192.168.177.9 (voip phone) should use WAN2. So far I didn't figure out how to do that.
Can I put VOIP into one VLAN group and allocated VLAN to one specific WAN interface?
Brgds

So, you can hear the phone ringing and answer it? which means that SIP pakets are coming through WAN to LAN and well redirected to the phone IP, but you cannot hear after that, which means that there could be a problem with the RTP packets.
If you have problem only with the incoming calls and not the outgoing, than try enable/disable SIP ALG (Firewall). If that doesn't fix the issue, try to allow (or even forward) from WAN to LAN RDP - UDP ports 16384-32767 to the phone IP.
Regards,
Kremena

LRT224 and Spotify/port forwarding on dual WAN set-up.

Very pleased with the LRT224, which was easy to set up (dual WAN, one cable modem, one VDSL). I'm using it for a small home-based business with several PC's, and it's worked a dream in the load-balancing mode. My request is beyond my current technical knowledge, however: we have Spotify on one PC for "background entertainment". It's a total bandwidth-hog, so I'd like to set it up to use the slower of the two WANs (VDSL) only. I'm something of a newbie to the techniques of port forwarding, so I'd be really grateful if someone could describe the steps to bond all Spotify inbound/outbound traffic to WAN2. Is this even possible...? Thanks in advance - Steve

You can define a specific IP addresses or specific application service ports to go through a user-assigned WAN for external connections via Protocol Binding. Just bind the MAC address of your device to an IP address to properly route traffic to the specific device by IP and MAC binding.

Dual Wan and port routing

Hi,
I am setting up a configuration with SA520W and 2 Wan, in load balancing. But I face a problem that I could not understand.
Traffic is HTTP, SIP and 2 servers.
Servers are for a VPN tunnel and a mail server with ActiveSync
Both services absolutely need port 443 on the external IP, and that's one of the dual wan reason.
The 2 wan are running, load balancing mode is enable and NAt routing in firewall tab as follow :
443 Enabled     WAN     LAN     ALU_OpenVPN     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.150     WAN1     Always
443   Enabled     WAN     LAN     ActiveSync     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN2     Always
If load balanced
Port 443 is NOT routed from wan1 to 192.168.0.150
Port 443 is routed from wan2 to 192.168.0.254
If only WAN 1
Port 443 is routed from wan1 to 192.168.0.150
If only WAN 2
Port 443 is routed from wan2 to 192.168.0.254
In fact I did other testing and no port routing with WAN1 when load balancing is enable, even on port that is not used at all on Wan2.
With a FTP filezilla server, it's OK if on wan2, and it stop before logging if on a wan1 (on laod balancing, ok on both case if only one wan)
Firmware : latest 2.1.18
Any Clue ??

Hello,
I confirm, there is a strange behaviour.
Simple test :
Dual Wan configured.
A FTP server on the LAN (192.168.0.254) port 21
Firewall , ipv4 config :
WAN   to   LAN     FTP     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN1
WAN   to   LAN     FTP     ALLOW always     Any         192.168.0.254     WAN2
Then some testing using a FTP client outside the LAN, connection from Internet.
Then, changing ONLY the Wan Mode :
1/ Use only single WAN port : Dedicated WAN
==> FTP connect through WAN1
2/ Use only single WAN port : Optional WAN
==>FTP connect through WAN2
3/ Load Balancing
==>FTP connect through WAN1
==>FTP DO NOT connect through WAN1
Is that a bug or do I have some strange stuff somewhere ?
I will pick up another SA520W from stock, brand new, update the firmware, configure the 2 WAN (invering the 2 provider just in case) and do the same test.

ASA 5505 Dual WAN - Ping inactive wan from outside?

I currently have some small branch offices using ASA 5505 with Security Plus license and dual wan connections. They are configured wil an sla monitor so if the primary WAN goes down the secondary connection becomes active. This works as expected, however...
I can't ping the non-active interface from an outside source. I beleive this is by design or due to some limitation on the 5505. The problem is that I don't know if the backup WAN connection is functioning normally without forcing the ASA to make it active. We use a flaky wireless connection for the backups. The problem recently bit me because both WAN connections were offline.
I'm looking for an easy way to monitor the inactive wan interface, preferably by pinging from an outside location. Is this possible?

Hello,
This wont work because the ASA receives the ping on the backup link but has the default route pointing to the outside.
You would have to add a more spefic route for your IP.
Example:
If you want to ping coming from IP 1.1.1.1
route outside 0 0 x.x.1.1 1 track 1
route backup 0 0 x.x.2.2 250
route backup 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 x.x.2.2
Regards,
Felipe.
Remember to rate useful posts.

RV042 - WAN Routing Assistance

I have my RV042 set up in Dual WAN mode and both WANs are working properly. I would like to configure WAN1 to handle all traffic, unless it fails and then have everything to go to WAN2. Pretty much what Smart Link Backup does, however with that enabled only 1 of the WANs is live at any given time. I'd like both WANs to always be live as I'm going to see the second one as a back-door into the network. Is this possible to do with routing? I tried setting a routing rule to have everything to go WAN1, but when WAN1 goes down, nothing is rounted via WAN2.
Thanks.

Hello,
I understand what you were trying to accomplish but this is not something you can do through static routing.
Your route technically says to get to the 192.168.1.0 subnet go to 192.168.1.1, and since the subnet mask is 255.255.255.0 your destination is being changed to the network ID.
There is however a way to setup Dual WAN so that certain clients use a certain WAN.
Go ahead and delete the static route you have created as it won't do what you are looking for.
Then go to System Management >> Dual WAN and click the configuration for one of the WANs.
At the bottom of that page you will see the protocol binding section.
For the service you should select all traffic, the source IP will be whatever clients you want to send out a certain WAN, and for the destination just use 0.0.0.0. Then select the WAN port you want that client to use. This will setup a rule to send traffic from that host out the WAN you specified. You may need to create several to cover all of your clients.
There is also a Small Business Knowledge base article with some screenshots to help illustrate what I am talking about. That is available here about halfway down the page.
Setup Dual WAN on RV042
Hope that helps, if you do have any problems with it go ahead and give us a call at the SBSC and we can assist you in getting this configured.
Thank you for choosing Cisco,
Christopher Ebert - Advanced Network Support Engineer
Cisco Small Business Support Center
*please rate helpful posts*

OnPlus Dual WAN monitoring

Is there any way to get a single OnPlus to monitor two (or more) WAN connections at a customer site simultaneously?
I have customers that use dual wan routers (RV's and ISA's) that I would like to be able to only roll-out a single OnPlus to instead of needing to roll-out One OnPlus for each WAN and then policy route them over each individual WAN link.

The short answer is yes.
I'm assuming the dual internet connections are setup to either load balance or failover. In either situation, technically speaking, OnPlus would never lose connection unless both connections go down and thus would never alert.
So the way that I would go about monitoring both connections with a single OnPlus would be to ensure that ICMP is allowed outbound through your client's firewall. Then, after the ON100 is deployed and completes discovery, I would manually add 2 devices, one for each internet connection. I would make those devices the circuit endpoint at each provider, which is generally the gateway addresses your border router/firewall uses. I would then use ICMP monitoring on each of those devices in OnPlus to alert if it loses connection.

Lrt224 dual wan router

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for