LRT224 Load Balance "dumb" DHCP router setup... HELP!

Hi
I'm trying to set up a LRT224 with two ADSL modems connected to one network with load balancing.
I'm not going to use vlan or vpn at all.
All I need it to do is be a "dumb" router that combines the speed of both Internet connections.
Working mode is set to Router
LAN 192.168.0.1/255.255.255.0 (I changed the LAN ip range)
WAN 1 and 2 gets IP, default gateway and DNS trough DHCP from the modems.
Wan 1: IP 192.168.1.65 Gateway 192.168.1.1 DNS 192.168.1.1
Wan 2: IP 192.168.2.38 Gateway 192.168.2.1 DNS 192.168.2.1
DHCP setup:
Device IP: 192.168.0.1
Subnet: 255.255.255.0
DHCP Server
Range 192.168.0.50/254
DNS: Use DNS from ISP
Dual Wan:
Load Balance
I'm no IT expert at but I have set up a few routers before that was close to "plug and play"
My problem is that connected computers indicate that they are connected to Internet, but I'm not able to access any websites.
When trying to use windows troubleshooter it indicates that there is a DNS problem.
I'm not even able to connect to the modems.
Installed latest firmware and done a fabric restore.
Network is built as follows (still working as I'm not running anything trough the lrt224 before I can get it to work)
ADSL Modem with built in DHCP and Switch --> Switch --> Ubiquiti Unifi AP --> User
Some of the AP's is connected via Ubiquiti NanoStation (wireless bridge between 4 houses, works great)
Any idea how to get this to work or do I have the wrong router?

I recommend:
Modem1 (192.168.1.1)=> LRT WAN1 (192.168.1.254)
Modem2 (10.10.10.1) => LRT WAN2 (10.10.10.254)
LRT WAN1 SN (255.255.255.0)
LRT WAN2 SN (255.255.255.0)
LRT WAN1 GW (192.168.1.1)
LRT WAN2 GW (10.10.10.1)
LRT WAN1 DNS (192.168.1.1)
LRT WAN2 DNS (10.10.10.1)
System Management => Load Balance
LRT DHCP Device IP (192.168.200.1)
LRT LAN => Switch => Ubiquiti Unifi AP => User
Nothing other than the LRT's connected to the modems.
If the modems DHCP is set to 192.168.1.x and 10.10.10.x subnet 255.255.255.0 then DHCP setting will work on the LRT WANs.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Similar Messages

LRT224 Load Balancing with only one ISP

I found that the LRT224 Load Balancing really increased performance on my network with a single Internet Service Provider.
Also if your ISP doesn't limit the number of Public IP Addresses your ISP Device can provide to one. You can get two Public IP Address for additional port forwarding and other uses.
------------------- OR ----------------------------
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

In my case I noticed an immediate improvement in overall performance. When I do a "speedtest.net" test the speeds are always at the maximum throughput even with other heavy users on the internet. Which wasn't the case before. I suspect that the Dual WAN connections are doubling the amount of available full speed connections due to the load balancing.
It's interesting to watch the ethernet port lights on the ISP Modem blinking like mad as the LRT224 pumps data through the two ethernet ports.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

MULTIPLE LISTENER의 LOAD BALANCING 및 2개의 NETWORK CARD 사용 시 SETUP

제품 : SQL*NET
작성날짜 : 1997-11-24
MULTIPLE LISTENER의 LOAD BALANCING 및 2개의 NETWORK CARD 사용 시 SETUP
=====================================================================
Oracle V7.3의 SQL*Net 2.3의 새로운 기능으로 여러 개의 Listener를 띄우면서
상호 Load Balancing을 유지하는 기능을 소개하고자 한다.
Load Balancing 기능을 이용하여 각각의 Listener와 Oracle Instance 간의
Overloading을 줄일 수 있다.
다음의 예는 하나의 장비 내에 2개의 Network Card가 있을 경우에 대해 setup을
하는 방법이며 만일 하나의 Network Card가 있을 경우는 Host는 하나만 지정
하면 된다.
1. init<SID>.ora file을 지정할 Parameter
MTS_MULTIPLE_LISTENERS=TRUE
COMPATIBLE=7.3.2.0
2. 예를 들어 Listener를 2개 사용하는 경우라면 initSID.ora에
mts_dispatchers="tcp,10"
mts_max_dispatchers=20
mts_servers=20
mts_max_servers=40
mts_service=ORA73
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1621)(host=152.69.30.100))
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1622)(host=152.69.30.100))
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1623)(host=152.69.30.102))
mts_listener_address="(address_list=
(address=(protocol=tcp)(port=1624)(host=152.69.30.102))
3. listener.ora file에 설정되는 내용은
LISTENER1 =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.100)
(PORT=1621)
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.100)
(PORT=1622)
LISTENER2 =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.102)
(PORT=1623)
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = tcp)
(HOST = 152.69.30.102)
(PORT=1624)
SID_LIST_LISTENER1 =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = ORA73)
(ORACLE_HOME=/oracle2/ora73/app/oracle/product/7.3.2)
SID_LIST_LISTENER2 =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = ORA73)
(ORACLE_HOME=/oracle2/ora73/app/oracle/product/7.3.2)
STARTUP_WAIT_TIME_LISTENER1 = 0
STARTUP_WAIT_TIME_LISTENER2 = 0
CONNECT_TIMEOUT_LISTENER1 = 0
CONNECT_TIMEOUT_LISTENER2 = 0
4. tnsnames.ora file에 설정되는 내용들
* 다수의 port에 Random하게 접속하는 경우
RANDOM =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.100)
(Port = 1621)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.100)
(Port = 1622)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.102)
(Port = 1623)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host = 152.69.30.102)
(Port = 1624)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
* 개개의 Port로 접속하는 경우
TORA1 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1621)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
TORA2 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1622)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
TORA3 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1623)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
TORA4 =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS =
(PROTOCOL = TCP)
(Host =krrcsun)
(Port = 1624)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SID = ORA73)
5. 각각의 Listener를 띄우는 방법
$ lsnrctl start LISTENER1
$ lsnrctl start LISTENER2

LRT224 Load Balancing Servers

I get the process of load balancing outbound traffic, and even protocol binding so that servers send out traffic only on a specific WAN port. What I do not get is how to load balance INBOUND traffic also to those servers and ensure that the servers response goes out on the interface that it originated.
I have two 50mb internet connections from different ISPs. Each with a static IP address.
The web server is on a private IP address with appropriate forwarding.
The web server IP address is bound to WAN2 which is the DNS address of the web server.
All works perfect. Outboud traffic from the web server exits from the appropriate WAN port while residual traffic is load balanced.
Now, I want to add an A record to the DNS for the web server so that INBOUND traffic ot he web server is balanced and providing a redundant service. However, the protocol binding should not allow any outbound connection through WAN1. Right?
So my question is, is this setup impossible? Do we forget the protocol binding and hope that the outbound responses from the server exits through the originating port? Is there another method? Or, do I need a more advanced router?
I do not even want to consider DMZ even as this is impossible since I am utilizing both ports as WAN ports. Anyone have any suggestions to do this?
Thanks
Mark

Sorry I misunderstood.
IMO for this to work on an LRT224 you would need:
A second network adapter in the Server and the Server configured to answer requests on both NIC's
Protocol Binding the second Server NIC to the other WAN port
A DNS Hosting Service that support DNS Round Robin or you would run your own DNS Server with Round Robin DNS capabilities
These days I'm seeing DNS propagation with namesecure only taking a few hours instead of the advertised 96hrs.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

ISE 1.2 - Multiple NICs/Load Balancing for DHCP Probe

Hello guys
Just prepping an ISE 1.2 patch 8 setup in our organization. I am going for the virtual appliances with multiple NICs. It will be a distributed deployment with 4 x PSNs behind a load balancer and there is no requirement for wireless or guest user at the moment. I've got 2 points I will like to get some guidance on:
Our DC has a dedicated mgmt network and I plan to IP the gig0 interface of the PANs, MNTs and PSNs from this subnet. All device admin, clustering, config replication, etc will be over this interface. However, RADIUS/probe/other user traffic to the ISE PSNs will be over the gig1 interface which will be addressed from another L3 network. Is this a supported configuration in ISE?
I intend to use the DHCP probe as part of device profiling and will ideally like to have just an additional ip helper to add to our switch SVI config. Also, it will appear that WLCs can only be configured for 2 DHCP servers for a given network so another consideration for when we bringing our WLAN in scope. We however use ACE load balancers within our DC and from what I have read, they do not support DHCP load balancing. Are there any workarounds to using the DHCP probe with multiple PSNs without having to add each node as an ip helper/DHCP server on the NADs?
Thanks in advance
Sayre

Hello Sayre-
For Question #1:
Management is restricted to GigabitEthernet 0 and that cannot be changed so you should be good there
You can configure Radius and Profiling to be enabled on other interfaces
Even though you are not using guest services yet, you can dedicate an interface just for that. As a result, you can separate guest traffic completely from your production network
Take a look at this link for more info:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/security/ise/1-2/installation_guide/ise_ig/ise_app_c-ports.html
For Question #2
If you are using a Cisco WLC and running code 7.4 and newer you don't need to mess with the IP helper configurations.
The controller can be configured to act as a collector for client profiling and interact with the DHCP thread along with the RADIUS accounting task that is running on the controller. The controller receives a copy of the DHCP request packet sent from the DHCP thread and parses the DHCP packet for two options:
–Option 12—HostName of the client
–Option 60—The Vendor Class Identifier
After this information is gathered from the DHCP_REQUEST packet, a message is formed by the controller with these option fields and is sent to the RADIUS accounting thread, which is in turn transmitted to the ISE in the form of an interim accounting message.
Both DHCP and HTTP profiling settings are located under the "Advanced" configuration tab in the WLC
On the other hand, you can also use Anycast for profiling. You can check out some of Cisco Live's sessions for more info on that. Here is one that is from a couple of years (There are more recent ones that are available as well):
http://www.alcatron.net/Cisco%20Live%202013%20Melbourne/Cisco%20Live%20Content/Security/BRKSEC-3040%20%20Advanced%20ISE%20and%20Secure%20Access%20Deployment.pdf
I hope this helps!
Thank you for rating helpful posts!

LRT224 load balancing, switching between circuits "resets" secure sites

We have noticed a problem with certian secure websites when load balancing is enabled on the LRT224. The company has a DSL and cable circuit, static I/P's on both. Running Speedtest shows a 30m pipe with load balancing enabled, about 16m on each when off. When utilizing load balancing, if accessing banking, government or otherwise more secure sites, those pages will reset to the login consistently. If turning off load balancing and picking either circuit, this does not occur. We have 2 identical LRT224's and the both do it. I have contacted Linksys customer support to no avail. Firmware is up to date. This is entirely replicateable on both units and very consistent. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Chris

Chris_Shalvoy wrote:
chadster766,
i have updated the firmware as directed and the result is the same. as i indicated, it's easily reproduced by just switching the router to a single circuit (fail over mode) and those sites do not reset. i have 2 exact units and they both perform the same. for a quick fix, i just turn off load balancing, perform the banking functions and then return it to load balancing. not hard just doesn't seem this revision addresses the problem but thank you for the assistance to date.Did you enable Sticky Load Balancing?Use the below link to make sure the feature is functioning properly. Your IP Address shouldn't change if it's working:http://www.mccuesoft.com/myinfo.php

Server Load-balancing and ACL router decision

Hello,
My 2 server farm distribution switches are running in "hybrid" mode, with CAT OS on the switch and IOS on the MSFC.
My server team is asking to block traffic to a specific server that is load balanced using Cisco's CSM load-balancer which is also installed in the chassis.
The question that I have is this.
Does anyone know in what order the MSFC will inspect and apply the ACL and when will the CSM make the load balancing decision?
The reason I need to know this is that the CSM is setup in bridged mode, where traffic to the server comes into the MSFC with a destination IP of a VIP which resides on the CSM. Subsequently, the CSM forwards the traffic to the one of the real servers in the load-balanced server farm after it makes its load-balancing decision. Which ocurrs first??
Does anyone have any info on what ocurrs first and so forth??
Is there a link to Cisco's website that explains this process??
Thanks in advance for your help.
Tony

Tony,
It sounds as if your setup is like this:
Client VLAN----MSFC----VLAN A----CSM----Server VLAN
With VLAN A and Server VLAN being the same IP subnet.
In this case all client traffic reaching the VIPs on the CSM first traverses the MSFC. So, if you want to block traffic to a specific VIP or Server IP you can do that on the MSFC's Interface for Client VLAN. You could configure an access list that filters inbound traffic on that VLAN interface.
Make sense?
-Brad

LRT224 Load Balancing and Link Failover

Hi, I am new to this forum. I have recently set up the LRT224 with two different ISP's. I am having problems configuring the Load Balance and Link Failover.
When I have Load Balance selected only one ISP (WAN 1) is active, the other (WAN2, ISP modem) remains inactive. Why is Load Balance only engaging one ISP?
When I have Link Failover selected, even with attempts and seconds configured to one second, and WAN1 has packets lost, it doesn't switch over to WAN2.
I am not tech savey but any help will be greatly appreciated so that I can get both ISP's active with Load Balance or at least have Link Failover work almost instantly. Thanks.

Hi @BSue2015,
If both WAN1 and WAN2 are already getting IP Addresses from your ISPs then we can say that Load Balance is working. To check it further, do a speed test by going to http://www.speedtest.net. Dual WAN connections are doubling the amount of available full speed connections due to the load balancing. The speed should have its maximum throughput even if you have several users on the network.

LRT224 Load Balancing

Hi there just wondering can the LRT224 handle load balancing a 130/7 and 107/30 connection. Thanks

Hi @Spencer1990,
I agree with Chadster. It should be able to. According to the Specifications of the LRT224 router, IPsec VPN throughput (110 Mbps), Maximum NAT throughput (900 Mbps), Maximum concurrent connections (30,000).
I got it from this link: http://www.linksys.com/en-apac/business/products/routers/lrt224
Thank you.

Load Balancing on 837 router

HI Prof,
I've two cisco 837 router with cisco IOS 12.3 currently. I would like to configure load balancing on both the router, have tried to configure GLBP but it show me that the hardware not supported.
Is there any other protocol or technology to achieve my desire?
Thank and Advice.

What are your requirements. Do you have multiple segments to support? Are you only looking for load-balancing or do you have a high availibility requirement?
In that case you can use multiple HSRP groups for instance.
Do both 837 routers have a separate xDSL connection?
Are you using NAT to translate between private and public address pools?
There is more than one solution to achieve load-balancing. Please answer the above questions and if possible draw a simple diagram of your desired topology.
HTH
Leon

Load Balancing issue on RAC setup

1. We have a Oracle RAC cluster having two node say node1-vip and node2-vip
2. We have two client software (both uses weblogic as app server) say ANP and HDM
3. We configure connect string for HDM by giving node1-vip as primary and node2-vip as secondary. Here is the connect string we provide
jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node1-vip)(PORT=1521))(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node2-vip)(PORT=1521))(FAILOVER=on)(LOAD_BALANCE=off))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=DEDICATED)(SERVICE_NAME= anpdb)))
4. We configure connect string for ANP by giving node2-vip as primary and node1-vip as secondary. Here is the connect string we provide
jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node2-vip)(PORT=1521))(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node1-vip)(PORT=1521))(FAILOVER=on)(LOAD_BALANCE=off))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=DEDICATED)(SERVICE_NAME= anpdb)))
We are observing that connection for HDM is only going to node1-vip however connection for ANP sometime goes to only node2-vip however sometime it is getting distributed between node1-vip and node2-vip. Whenever there is more connection on node1-vip than node2-vip then connection for ANP is only going to node2-vip however whenever number of connection at node2-vip is equal or greater than node-1 vip, connection for ANP gets distributed between node1-vip and node2-vip
Thanks
Sumit

Hi,
jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS_LIST=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node1-vip)(PORT=1521))(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=node2-vip)(PORT=1521))(FAILOVER=on)(LOAD_BALANCE=off))(CONNECT_DATA=(SERVER=DEDICATED)(SERVICE_NAME= anpdb)))
Why have you put *(LOAD_BALANCE=off)* ?
And from your post, you are not trying to use actual load balancing.
You are trying to give connectivity like this HDM->node 1 and ANM->node 2
In that case you need tp specify only one server vip address.
When you configure the connection entries like above, when a new user session connection is requested, listener will connect the user to whichever address is reachable at that time.
Hope you got my point...
Regards,
Mahesh.

WRT54G Router Setup Help!!!

Hey guys. I have a WRT54G router. I have AT&T yahoo DSL and a modem that came with it. Whats going on is that I bought a new Dell inspiron laptop computer with a 802.11g wireless card. I bought the router so I can create a wireless network.
When I connect the ethernet cable from the MODEM to my LAPTOP i can access the internet just fine when I click on internet explorer.
When I connect the router to the ethernet cable and try to setup the wireless network nothing happens and it won't finish the install from the LinkSYS CD I installed. I even tried to make it into a wired network.
(MODEM ----CABLE --ROUTER--CABLE---LAPTOP) but I couldn't setup up the internet at all either.
I click on the network connections(on my VISTAPC) and I can see the greens bars lit up on the LYNKSYS network and can't seem to connect to it.
when I take the cable from the router and put it straight into my laptop without my router the internet works just fine. Help! Thanks
Ernesto

hi... if you are aware of modem settings...logon to modem's setup page and select "ethernet bridged" and save the settings...connect modem >> router >> pc and logon to router's and select PPPoE under "automatic configuration DHCP" put the username and password and save the settings...click on status tab and try connecting to the PPPoE server...however if you are not aware of the modem settings...well in that case you need to get in touch with your ISP and convert the modem into the bridge mode...let me know if you have any issues will get back to you...
thanks.

WRT54G Wireless Router Setup Help Needed

Hi,
I have a WRT 54G router I want to set up on my network.
What I want to be able to do is have the router allow wireless laptops to connect via wireless, but I want the router to assign the IP automatically through DHCP. Is this possible?
My Network information is as follows:
Router would be assigned IP 192.168.72.10
Network information for Office where this is going:
Subnet: 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway: 192.168.72.1
Primary DNS: 192.168.1.59
Secondary DNS: 192.168.1.52
any help would be appreciated...

First of all, let me say that, assuming you have a Linksys router in the main office, that there is no reason why that router could not use both fixed LAN IP addresses, and have its DHCP server turned on and give out DHCP addresses also. So, it seems like you could setup the system in the manner I mentioned in my previous post.   Unless, for some reason, you prefer not to do it this way.
If you really want to set it up with the WRT54G giving out DHCP addresses, then read on:
If you want to use the DHCP server in the WRT54G, you will need to place it on a separate subnet.
I'm still a bit confused by what you have written. You said that the WRT54G router "would be assigned IP 192.168.72.10". And later you said that my assumption was correct that you set the "Local IP Address" to this value.   However, if you want to use the DHCP server in the WRT54G, this will not work, because to use the DHCP server, the WRT54G needs to be on a separate subnet.
Instead, in the WRT54G, you would need to set the "Internet Connection Type" to "Static", then give the WRT54G the WAN address (not local IP address) of 192.168.72.10.   (You will also need to specify the subnet mask 255.255.255.0 , default gateway 192.168.72.1 , and DNS (proxy) server 192.168.72.1 ) You would need to reset the WRT54G's "Local IP address" to a subnet that is not used elsewhere in your network. Since you apparently already use 192.168.1.x and 192.168.72.x subnets, you will need to pick something else, perhaps 192.168.54.1 for the "local IP address" of the WRT54G.
In this type of setup, you would leave the DHCP server of the WRT54G enabled, and wire a LAN port from the office router to the Internet port of the WRT54G.
In this case, the WRT54G is in control of all your router settings, including port forwarding, DHCP server, and wireless settings. Also note that if you need to forward a port, you will need to forward the port through your entire network, not just the WRT54G.
One additional warning. I have not personally used a "3 subnet" system with Linksys routers. So I am not certain that all your DNS addresses will flow through the system properly. If it doesn't work, you may need to enter some of you actual Internet based DNS addresses (or perhaps your Primary and Secondary 192.168.1.59 and .52 DNS servers) into the WRT54G router by hand, rather than using the built in Linksys DNS proxy at 192.168.72.1
Hope this helps.
Message Edited by toomanydonuts on 12-04-2007 04:34 PM

DHCP snooping setup help

Hi,
Can anyone help me with these setup issues.
The Cat OS config guide chapter "configuring DHCP-snooping and IP source guard" for v8.4 doesnt mention how to:
1) Disable dhcp-snooping
2) configure a destination for the snooping database.
I would like to setup the local flash PCMCIA card as a destination for the DB.
I have found documentation for other releases of CatOS that state how to specify a DB location:
set dhcp-snooping bindings-database <device>:[filename]
However this syntax is not supported in 8.4. With command line auto-complete (the tab key) and/or help there is no option for "bindings-database" available.
Do I need to activate the DB somewhere else in the config?
thanks,

The command to disable DHCP snooping is:disabled the ip dhcp snooping

HTTP logs not created when using software load balancer

This is my setup:
1. I have a server running a software load balancer - call it A
2. There are two servers clustered under A - call it X and Y
3. I am able to access the application deployed on X and Y through A.
Fail-over also works. Shutting down X when the application is up and running routes the requests to Y and vice-versa. All is well until this point.
Problem is:
Let us take server X.
$ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/logs does not have an access log in it. (It
however has an error log.)
Access logs are not created when accessing the servers in the cluster (X and Y) through the load balancer URL.
However, when accessing the individual servers in the cluster (with their URLs), access logs are created.
Specifics on the setup:
1. A, X, Y - all three are OAS 10.1.3.2
2. All three are deployed on individual server machines
3. All three servers have one OC4J instance each running in them
4. The software load balancer used is from WebLogic 8.1sp5 - basically to create a *.war file that has the details of X and Y (servers in the cluster)
5. This *.war file is deployed on A
6. Server A, the one that has the software load balancer, DOES NOT have AS control. One of the other servers in the cluster does.
Has anybody encountered this problem before? Or is there anything wrong
with the setup? What is the resolution for the same?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.

Thank you, Jacco. You are right in saying that the software load balancer does not route the request to Apache and hence the logs are not created.
While the logs are not critical to the component we are working on, was just wondering why they were not being created.
As regards your comment on FastCGI, there is a FastCGI directory created under $ORACLE_HOME/Apache/Apache/logs - but there is nothing in it. Neither do the error logs have any information pertaining to FastCGI.
Anyway, I am not going to worry about this issue anymore - may be sometime in the future will try to use a different software load balancer and see if it makes any difference.

LRT224 Load Balance "dumb" DHCP router setup... HELP!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for