LRT224 Load Balancing with only one ISP

I found that the LRT224 Load Balancing really increased performance on my network with a single Internet Service Provider.
Also if your ISP doesn't limit the number of Public IP Addresses your ISP Device can provide to one. You can get two Public IP Address for additional port forwarding and other uses.
-------------------            OR           ----------------------------
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

In my case I noticed an immediate improvement in overall performance. When I do a "speedtest.net" test the speeds are always at the maximum throughput even with other heavy users on the internet. Which wasn't the case before. I suspect that the Dual WAN connections are doubling the amount of available full speed connections due to the load balancing.
It's interesting to watch the ethernet port lights on the ISP Modem blinking like mad as the LRT224 pumps data through the two ethernet ports.
Please remember to Kudo those that help you.
Linksys
Communities Technical Support

Similar Messages

  • Load balancing with only one Real Server on CSM

    Other than create a VSERVER with only one real server in it - is there a way of load balancing when you have only one real server now and may be additional servers to be added later?

    the only way is to use the vserver.
    Gilles.

  • GSS load balancing ? Only one GSS seems to answer

    Hi,
    We have configured two GSSs but only one of them seems to respond to DNS requests, I see this via the answer hit counts.
    The box that answers is NOT the GSSM Primary. I was under the impression that both boxes could/would respond or is this not true.
    Any facts would be appreciated. Cheers.
    Mike

    The RoundRobin balancing will not be a perfect distribution if you use the AP-KAL mechanism for your keepalive. This is because when the load on the answers changes, the "order" is sorted, and the top of the sorted list is used for the next answer even though the sorted order is of no interest in a roundrobin balance.To get a perfect roundrobin balance, use a different keepalive.

  • LRT224 Load Balancing and Link Failover

    Hi, I am new to this forum. I have recently set up the LRT224 with two different ISP's. I am having problems configuring the Load Balance and Link Failover.
    When I have Load Balance selected only one ISP (WAN 1) is active, the other (WAN2, ISP modem) remains inactive. Why is Load Balance only engaging one ISP?
    When I have Link Failover selected, even with attempts and seconds configured to one second, and WAN1 has packets lost, it doesn't switch over to WAN2.
    I am not tech savey but any help will be greatly appreciated so that I can get both ISP's active with Load Balance or at least have Link Failover work almost instantly. Thanks.

    Hi @BSue2015,
    If both WAN1 and WAN2 are already getting IP Addresses from your ISPs then we can say that Load Balance is working. To check it further, do a speed test by going to http://www.speedtest.net. Dual WAN connections are doubling the amount of available full speed connections due to the load balancing. The speed should have its maximum throughput even if you have several users on the network.

  • Multihomed eBGP load balancing with 3 ISP's

    We currently peer with 2 ISPs using BGP in an active/failover configuration.  My company wants to move to a 3 ISP model where Internet traffic is split across the 3 providers so that bandwidth is equally distributed on outgoing traffic across our 2 /22 ARIN IP ranges.  This is from our 2 edge switches that have VSS.  
    Within my limited knowledge of BGP, I have determined that we could do load sharing pretty easily by adding multiple default routes and breaking up our /22's into /24 and advertising them that way.  However, I don't think this satisfies the request that downtime must be seamless, should one link drop.  
    Currently, our ISP's advertise default routes.  From the research that I've done, we could get close to load balanced links if we receive full BGP routes and community settings and definitions.  I'm nervous about this because it looks really complicated, and I don't want our AS to turn into a transit AS.  I've been told the same can be accomplished with only partial BGP routes and community settings and definitions.  
    Personally, I think we just need a WAN load balancer.  However, given the request, is there a thread out there that can explain this, or can someone discuss this requested scenario a little bit?  
    Thanks!

    Hi there
    First question would be what is the required reconvergence time for the applications using the Internet? Should an outage occur, when do they lose their state? Once you know that, you then have a target to aim for in terms of recovery
    With regards load-balancing, with BGP we are always talking inbound and outbound.
    The outbound solution is relatively simple - each ISP advertises a default route to your Internet edge router(s). Create an eBGP session from each edge router to the core, advertise the default route and redistribute into the IGP. Ensure the IGP cost to each BGP next hop is equal and you have ECMP for outbound routing.
    Inbound influence is usually via MED (not likely in this case given 3 ISPs), adjusting local-pref in the ISP via BGP EXT communities configured your end, or via AS-PATH prepending for longer prefixes from your /22. Prepending would be simplest, but your unlikely to get an exact inbound traffic split, however a relatively even distribution should be sufficient. 

  • CF 10 Load-Balancing with Remote Instances

    I was reading an article on Clustering/LB/HA using CF8, but have not found any updates for CF10.
    Using VM VirtualBox to setup a few virtual servers, I am looking to setup a load balancing of ColdFusion 10 on 2 remote instances. The goal would be have ColdFusion Cluster Manager be able to point http request to one of the two servers based on load/availability. Not really having a hardware cluster/failover setup, just managing resources on two CF instances instead of a standalone.
    The servers are Windows Server 2008 R2 with IIS7.5 and ColdFusion 10 Enterprise on installed on 3 of these machines. Let's call them CF-LBManager, CF-Web1, and CF-Web 2. In the CF Docs, they show the Cluster Manager adding the local CF instance and "if you want" a remote instance. However, this scenario would require the main instance to be running and not fail for it to direct to the other instance.
    I am trying to set this up now with CF-LBManager as just a manager of the requests coming in. In the Enterprise Manager >> Instance Manager, the local instance is shown and I add the two remote instances with the correct Remote Port, JVM Route, etc. I also made sure the <Cluster>...</Cluster> block was added to the two remote instances (CF-Web1 and CF-Web2) \runtime\conf\server.xml file too, Jetty Services also is running. Now under the Enterprise Manager >> Cluster Manager I add the two remote instances to the cluster, not the local instance on CF-LBManager with Multicast Port and Sticky Sessions enabled. On Submit, I get a green message "You must restart all the server instances and any configured webservers for these changes to take effect.". I go ahead and reboot the servers and come back.
    I now browse to the ColdFusion page as a test on CF-Web1 and CF-Web2 to make sure CF is running properly, they do. I then browse the IP of the CF-LBManager, however it only returns the local IIS web site and not redirect to one of the two cluster members. I am not seeing any message on the coldfusion-out.log on the remote instances. Am I not setting this up correctly or not enabling the Cluster Manager to take over and pass along the requests to those in the cluster?

    Unfortunatley I don't have a lot of experience with CF10 on Windows, but if you are running CF behind IIS I think  you will need to update the Tomcat connector configuraiton to do load balancing. I'm not sure if re-running the wsconfig tool on all of the servers will do this or not, but that is what I would suggest trying first. If that doesn't work you will need to update the Tomcat connector configuraiton manually. You can find more information on load balancing with the Tomcat connector here: http://tomcat.apache.org/connectors-doc/generic_howto/loadbalancers.html.

  • Load balancing with JSP

    Anyone and everyone,
    When configuring load balancing with Weblogic clusters, does load
    balancing take effect for all services or just EJB and RMI? Or another
    way of saying the same thing, can I setup weighted load balancing for
    the JSP engines across 2 weblogic servers.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mike

    The load-balancing documentation you read describing the different algorithms only applies to RMI stubs (e.g., EJB clients). Please see http://www.weblogic.com/docs51/cluster/concepts.html#1026091 for a description of how load-balancing/clustering works with servlets/JSPs.
    The short answer is that in using servlet clustering, most people want/need/use in-memory replication for HttpSession objects. In WLS 5.1 (and before), in-memory replication requires one or more proxy servers be set-up in front of the cluster. Typically, most people use something like BigIP to load-balance
    across the proxy servers and let the weblogic plug-in for the proxy server handle the routing to the cluster. The plug-in uses round-robin until an HttpSession is established for a user, then it always tries to route to the server where the user's session is located.
    Hope this helps,
    Robert
    Brian Lin wrote:
    All,
    I have a quesiton here regarding load balancing with DNS round robin. As of Chapter Adminstration of Clustering Weblogic server, Weblogic can be configured to balance by weight. How about Weblogic handle weight based balancing after DNS round robin ip response? or just can choose one way instead of both?
    What's the big difference between choosing BigIP and software balancing (WL)?
    Brian
    "Wei Guan" <[email protected]> wrote:
    I don't think you can configure this load balancing in weblogic in current
    release. However, if you have Big-IP or LocalDireoctr, you can set up
    weighted load-balancing there. Otherwise, weblogic proxy will use DNS round
    robin to do the load-balancing between JSP engins.
    My 2 cents.
    Cheers - Wei
    Michael Yakimisky <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    Anyone and everyone,
    When configuring load balancing with Weblogic clusters, does load
    balancing take effect for all services or just EJB and RMI? Or another
    way of saying the same thing, can I setup weighted load balancing for
    the JSP engines across 2 weblogic servers.
    Thanks in advance,
    Mike

  • JDBC load balancing with non RAC replicated instances

    Hi,
    The thin JDBC load balancing feature only works with RAC clusters or it can be used with two non RAC replicated instances using the same service name?
    Thanks,
    Ezio.

    Thank you Douglas for your time.
    I assumed the first case (database connection load balancing). I thought that the listener would do the load balancing and failover trick. So, I configured the JDBC connection as follow:
    String MM_loadBalance1_DRIVER = "oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver";
    String MM_loadBalance1_USERNAME = "scott";
    String MM_loadBalance1_PASSWORD = "tiger";
    String MM_loadBalance1_STRING = "jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=" +
    " (LOAD_BALANCE=on) (FAILOVER=on)"+
    " (ADDRESS_LIST="+
    " (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=test1) (PORT=1521))"+
    " (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=test2)(PORT=1521)))"+
    " (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=test)))";
    Driver DriverRecordset1 = (Driver)Class.forName(MM_loadBalance1_DRIVER).newInstance();
    Connection ConnRecordset1 = DriverManager.getConnection(MM_loadBalance1_STRING,MM_loadBalance1_USERNAME,MM_loadBalance1_PASSWORD);
    But, when one of the instances was down (test1), the connection failed, it didn't failed over to the other instance (test2).
    So I wondered if it failed due to some misconfiguration issue or because it only works with RAC instances...

  • Load Balancing with BigIP / SSL question

    I have an oddball question. We're load balancing ColdFusion
    MX7 across 3 servers using a BigIP load balancing server. We
    decided to go the hardware approach and it has been great except
    for one small configuration issue.
    We use a mix of SSL and non SSL pages, prior to the switch
    from a single server to a load balanced setup I used to script that
    would determine if a page that was supposed to be SSL had the
    variable CGI.HTTPS turned on or off. If it was off, the page would
    redirect back to itself with the SSL turned on.
    The problem we have is that we followed BigIP's instruction
    to secure the load balancing hardware instead of the three servers
    running behind it. So what happens is that the traffic goes to the
    load balancer port 441, but then the calls from the load balancer
    to the individual servers is port 80. So even if a page is called
    as HTTPS://... the coldfusion server says that CGI.HTTPS is "off"
    since the traffic is port 80.
    This isn't much of a problem, our SSL pages are linked as
    HTTPS:// and the only problem would actually arise if someone was
    to type in the URL and call it as HTTP rather than HTTPS.
    My questions is this, does anyone know of a way that I can
    detect if the page should be HTTPS and is not without changing our
    configuration and putting SSL certificates on each individual
    server?

    Hey,
    Well the load balancing with the BigIP device is really very
    amazing. I think
    what i liked most was swapping out servers when their lease
    was up, through the
    BigIP manager I just stopped all traffic to a server, shut it
    down, plugged in
    the new one and turned traffic back on. It was really very
    easy.
    The SSL stuff still gives me a headache to think about. but
    I should mention I
    no longer work where I was, plus now I'm all .net C# but
    that's a different
    story.
    I think if I was going to do this all again I would not have
    secured the bigIP
    unit. It was nice to buy one SSL cert for all the servers I
    attached rather
    than one per server, but getting the SSL sites to work
    properly was a headache.
    We also use windows file replication where now I would go
    with like a pair of
    Dell MD1000's mirrored for storage and just have tons of ram
    and cpu on the
    front end units. Depends what you want to spend I guess. I
    think the bigIP unit
    we bought was like 20 grand, i think they are cheaper now
    though.
    Hope I helped.

  • Load Balancing With Round Robin

    Hi,
    I have two iAS instances, each on their own box, and one iWS instance
    running on a third box. I have setup the web connector to use round
    robin and added the server weights. I believe that is all that is to it
    to do simple load balancing with iAS. The problem is is that the
    requests only go to one iAS instance. The server weights are 1 and 1.
    Am I missing something here?
    Thanks

    Could be lots of things.
    The most common misconfiguration is testing an application that is deployed "local". This application option effectively disables load balancing.
    Another common mistake is to either not update the configuration of the webconnector (if the webconnector
    has a seperate configuration LDAP) or to not restart
    the webconnector after the configuration change.
    Hope this helps. There's more things we could try, but I'll hope its one of these two easy things.

  • Load balancing with use of router 881.

    Hello,
    I have two MPLS line and i want load balancing with the help of CISCO router 881. is it necessary that i require two router on both location.? if one location have firewall and one location have cisco router 881 then can i do a load balancing or i require two router each on both location ? What are the basic requirement that i need.
    Thanks,
    Kuntal

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    An 881 should be able to load share across multiple ports.  Many routing protocol support ECMP, including BGP, but you need "special" hidden/secret commands to enable.  EIGRP also supports unequal cost load sharing.
    If an 881 supports OER or PfR, those too will do unequal load sharing, dynamically.

  • ACE 4710 and load balancing with sticky cookie

    Configuring load balancing with SSL termination and stickiness for a couple of citrix xenapp servers.  I'm doing a source-NAT as the ACE resides in the DMZ and these particular servers reside on the inside arm of the firewall.  The ACE is in bridged mode to load balance web servers that reside in the DMZ.  Everything seems to work just fine, but the cookie stickiness does not seem to be working.

    Hi David,
    As you may know, using Wireshark to look at an HTTPS capture is only useful if you've installed the server SSL key.This is why I find it easier to use something like LiveHTTPHeaders or HTTPWatch.
    When using cookie-insert, the ACE will not create any dynamic cookie entries.  It will simply create one static entry for each rserver with a cookie value, such as R3911631338, and any client that gets load balanced to that rserver will receive a cookie with that value.  So what you see there is what is expected.
    You are correct in that when using location cookies that the server supplies, the ACE will create a dynamic entry when it sees the server response with the cookie.   The cookie is included in the server's response, and the ACE will look for the value as configured.  The cookie will also be sent to the client.  If the cookie is not in the server's first response, you will need enable persistence-rebalance so that it will look in subsequent server responses.  If the browser opens new connections with that cookie, then the ACE will stick to the same server.
    My suggestion would be to get sticky working with cookie-insert first.  Then if that meets your needs, go with that permanently.  If you need to use server cookies, then once cookie insert is working, migrate your sticky to cookie location.
    Sean

  • T3 Load Balancing with Weblogic Server 6.1

    We are using rwo weblogic 6.1 servers A and B behind a load balancer with a DNS name (eg. www.loadbalancer.com). We are using T3 for Java client to application server communication. The client creates the Initial context with the load balancer url,creates remote objects using the context, closes the initial context and then tries to get a new initial Context. What we noticed is even though the client closes the first context and gets a new one, the client is always hooked on to only one server making load balancing ineffective. Is there a T3 configuration to release the connection when we close the context ? The documentation says only one T3 is established per client JVM.

    Rick,
    You may want to look at the Alteon and F5 configuration we have on edocs.
    Take a look at the following URLs for a possible solution
    http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs61/cluster/alteon.html#591902
    http://edocs.bea.com/wls/docs61/cluster/bigip.html#591902
    Chuck Nelson
    DRE
    BEA Technical Support

  • Issue with only one client - The client version 5.00.7958.1000 does not match the MP version 5.00.7711.0000. The client will not be installed.

    Below issue is with only one client in that untrusted domain. So boundary is not the issue.
    Env -
    mydom.com has SCCM PRI site (MP, DP as well).
    Client is in untrusted forest.
    Please help.
    Thanks
    MP 'mysccm.mydom.com' is compatible ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Retrieved 1 MP records from AD for site 'pri' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Retrived site version '5.00.7958.1000' from AD for site 'pri' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    SiteCode:         pri ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    SiteVersion:      5.00.7958.1000 ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Ccmsetup is being restarted due to an administrative action. Installation files will be reset and downloaded again. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Deleted file C:\Windows\ccmsetup\client.msi ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Only one MP mysccm.mydom.com is specified. Use it. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Searching for DP locations from MP(s)... ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Current AD site of machine is Default-First-Site-Name LocationServices 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Local Machine is joined to an AD domain LocationServices 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Current AD forest name is staging.local, domain name is staging.local LocationServices 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    DhcpGetOriginalSubnetMask entry point is supported. LocationServices 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Begin checking Alternate Network Configuration LocationServices 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Finished checking Alternate Network Configuration LocationServices 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Sending message body '<ContentLocationRequest SchemaVersion="1.00">
      <AssignedSite SiteCode="pri"/>
      <ClientPackage/>
      <ClientLocationInfo LocationType="SMSPACKAGE" DistributeOnDemand="0" UseProtected="0" AllowCaching="0" BranchDPFlags="0" AllowHTTP="1" AllowSMB="0" AllowMulticast="0"
    UseInternetDP="0">
        <ADSite Name="Default-First-Site-Name"/>
        <Forest Name="staging.local"/>
        <Domain Name="staging.local"/>
        <IPAddresses>
    <IPAddress SubnetAddress="10.72.117.0" Address="10.72.117.134"/>
    <IPAddress SubnetAddress="10.72.117.0" Address="10.72.117.142"/>
        </IPAddresses>
      </ClientLocationInfo>
    </ContentLocationRequest>
    ' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Sending message header '<Msg SchemaVersion="1.1"><ID>{5B972249-B931-4739-9EFA-A9FDE29C351A}</ID><SourceHost>STAGINGSRVR07</SourceHost><TargetAddress>mp:[http]MP_LocationManager</TargetAddress><ReplyTo>direct:STAGINGSRVR07:LS_ReplyLocations</ReplyTo><Priority>3</Priority><Timeout>600</Timeout><ReqVersion>5931</ReqVersion><TargetHost>mysccm.mydom.com</TargetHost><TargetEndpoint>MP_LocationManager</TargetEndpoint><ReplyMode>Sync</ReplyMode><Protocol>http</Protocol><SentTime>2014-11-04T17:14:55Z</SentTime><Body
    Type="ByteRange" Offset="0" Length="1264"/><Hooks><Hook3 Name="zlib-compress"/></Hooks><Payload Type="inline"/></Msg>' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    CCM_POST 'HTTP://mysccm.mydom.com/ccm_system/request' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Content boundary is '--aAbBcCdDv1234567890VxXyYzZ' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Received header '<Msg SchemaVersion="1.1">
     <ID>{D4EF0A4D-A000-4697-9AFA-B1317B09931D}</ID>
     <SourceID>GUID:21298681-5080-4365-B614-F0C8DF67452B</SourceID>
     <SourceHost>pri1SCCM02</SourceHost>
     <TargetAddress>direct:STAGINGSRVR07:LS_ReplyLocations</TargetAddress>
     <ReplyTo>MP_LocationManager</ReplyTo>
     <CorrelationID>{00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000}</CorrelationID>
     <Priority>3</Priority>
     <Timeout>600</Timeout>
     <TargetHost>STAGINGSRVR07</TargetHost><TargetEndpoint>LS_ReplyLocations</TargetEndpoint><ReplyMode>Sync</ReplyMode><Protocol>http</Protocol><SentTime>2014-11-04T17:14:55Z</SentTime><Body Type="ByteRange"
    Offset="0" Length="2408"/><Hooks><Hook3 Name="zlib-compress"/><Hook Name="authenticate"><Property Name="Signature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roperty><Property
    Name="AuthSenderMachine">pri1SCCM02;mysccm.mydom.com;</Property><Property Name="MPSiteCode">pri</Property></Hook></Hooks><Payload Type="inline"/></Msg>' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55
    PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Received reply body '<ContentLocationReply SchemaVersion="1.00"><ContentInfo PackageFlags="16777216"><ContentHashValues/></ContentInfo><Sites><Site><MPSite SiteCode="pri" MasterSiteCode="pri"
    SiteLocality="LOCAL" IISPreferedPort="80" IISSSLPreferedPort="443"/><LocationRecords><LocationRecord><URL Name="http://mysccm.mydom.com/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/pri00002"
    Signature="<ADSite">http://mysccm.mydom.com/SMS_DP_SMSSIG$/pri00002"/><ADSite Name="CSSG-Mount-Laurel"/><IPSubnets><IPSubnet Address="10.72.117.0"/><IPSubnet
    Address=""/></IPSubnets><Metric Value=""/><Version>7958</Version><Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities><ServerRemoteName>mysccm.mydom.com</ServerRemoteName><DPType>SERVER</DPType><Windows
    Trust="0"/><Locality>LOCAL</Locality></LocationRecord></LocationRecords></Site></Sites><ClientPackage FullPackageID="pri00002" FullPackageVersion="2" FullPackageHash="03CFD97C8FB5F7E7E9F177FD6D30D6F25ED106E517E69B715695A0E81DB1D9AF"
    MinimumClientVersion="5.00.7958.1000" RandomizeMaxDays="7" ProgramEnabled="false" LastModifiedTime="30388855;1262113920" SiteVersionMatch="true" SiteVersion="5.00.7958.1000" EnablePeerCache="true"/><RelatedContentIDs/></ContentLocationReply>'
    ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Found local location 'http://mysccm.mydom.com/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/pri00002' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Discovered 1 local DP locations. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    PROPFIND 'http://mysccm.mydom.com/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/pri00002' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Got 401 challenge Retrying with Windows Auth... ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    PROPFIND 'http://mysccm.mydom.com/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/pri00002' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Failed to correctly receive a WEBDAV HTTP request.. (StatusCode at WinHttpQueryHeaders: 401) ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Failed to check url http://mysccm.mydom.com/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/pri00002. Error 0x80004005 ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Enumerated all 1 local DP locations but none of them is good. Fallback to MP. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    GET 'HTTP://mysccm.mydom.com/CCM_Client/ccmsetup.cab' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    C:\Windows\ccmsetup\ccmsetup.cab is Microsoft trusted. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Successfully extracted manifest file C:\Windows\ccmsetup\ccmsetup.xml from file C:\Windows\ccmsetup\ccmsetup.cab. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Loading manifest file: C:\Windows\ccmsetup\ccmsetup.xml ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Successfully loaded ccmsetup manifest file. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Checking if manifest version '5.00.7958.1000' is newer than the ccmsetup version '5.0.7958.1000' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Running from temp downloaded folder or manifest is not newer than ccmsetup. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:55 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Adding file 'HTTP://mysccm.mydom.com:80/CCM_Client/x64/client.msi' to BITS job, saving as 'C:\Windows\ccmsetup\client.msi'. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:56 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Starting BITS download for client deployment files. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:56 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Successfully completed BITS download for client deployment files. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:57 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Successfully downloaded client files via BITS. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:57 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Validated file 'C:\Windows\ccmsetup\client.msi' hash 'A5732CE24F2B1545E9FBA458971E0A5504093E0F743CA9E8BD9C047582902878' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Retrieved client version '5.00.7958.1000' and minimum assignable site version '5.00.7845.1000' from client package ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Checking compatibility of site version '5.00.7958.1000', expect newer than '5.00.7845.1000' ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    Site version '5.00.7958.1000' is compatible. Client deployment will continue. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    An MP exists on this machine. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    The client version 5.00.7958.1000 does not match the MP version 5.00.7711.0000.  The client will not be installed. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    A Fallback Status Point has not been specified.  Message with STATEID='318' will not be sent. ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    InstallFromManifest failed 0x80004005 ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 4816 (0x12D0)
    CcmSetup failed with error code 0x80004005 ccmsetup 11/4/2014 12:14:58 PM 3680 (0x0E60)

    Why two primary that is 'coz geographically based server support and workstation. You can think it as a data center to data center split.
    That doesn't make sense and aren't valid reasons for 2012 (not that you can necessarily change it now).
    This line jumps out at me in the log file though: "An MP exists on this machine".
    That looks like the system you are installing on previously had an MP on it. I would delete the ccm namespace in WMI, cleanup all reference to ccm and Configuratin Manager from the registry, and then try again.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

  • CSS Load Balancing with Cookies

    We are trying to load balance 2 backend servers hosted on Websphere with advance balance cookies method.
    Restrictions
    ServerA is unable to accept cookies generated from ServerB.
    ServerA and ServerB are generating random cookies
    Unable to modify cookie string with a constant.
    How can we load balance based on cookies considering the above restrictions?
    We have attempted to do hash based load balancing with cookies but the problem we run into is the servers do not accept cookies generated from another server.
    The configuration we tried is written below:
    service ServerA
    ip address 192.168.10.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    active
    service ServerB
    ip address 192.168.20.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    active
    content ABC
    url "/*"
    add service ServerA
    string prefix "JSESSIONID="
    advanced-balance cookies
    port 80
    add service ServerB
    string skip-length 5
    string process-length 16
    string operation hash-xor
    protocol tcp
    vip address 172.16.32.1
    active
    Can we change the string prefix to JSESSION instead of JSESSIONID= ?
    The only place the app guys can add a constant string to match on is before the = sign.
    Is it possible for CSS to match on a constant string before = sign e.g below:
    service ServerA
    ip address 192.168.10.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    string id567=
    active
    service ServerB
    ip address 192.168.20.2
    keepalive type tcp
    keepalive port 80
    string id123=
    active
    content ABC
    url "/*"
    add service ServerA
    string prefix "JSESSION"
    advanced-balance cookies
    port 80
    add service ServerB
    string skip-length 0
    string process-length 6
    protocol tcp
    vip address 172.16.32.1
    active

    It should work.
    There is no reason for it not to work...
    This is the best method you can have on the CSS for stickyness.
    Get a sniffer trace on the client and server with arrowpoint cookie configured on the CSS and capture a failure so we can see what is going on.
    also send me the config so I can verify everything is ok.
    If you have a service request open with the TAC, you can also give the SR # so I can review what has been done.
    Gilles.

Maybe you are looking for