LSMW - Source List Upload

Hello Experts,
Would like to know whether SOURCE LIST master records can be uploaded using LSMW functionality?
Regards
Mahesh

Hi,
Certainly Source List can be uploaded through LSMW functionality.
You will have to go for recording & while recording LSMW for Source List, after entering Material Number & Plant, in the overview screen, select 'Edit --> New Records' & then enter your details of the vendor.
The only thing is that, for multiple sources, you will have to give those many input records in your input file while uploading the data.
Regards,
Prashant

Similar Messages

  • Lsmw source list

    Hello,
    Is it possible for me to create a recording in LSMW to upload Source List (Tcode ME01)? If so, can anyone guide me or can anyone give me a project/recording for Source List
    <removed by moderator>
    Edited by: Thomas Zloch on May 12, 2010 2:07 PM

    Hi,
    By using LSMW with recording type you can upload ME01 data.
    Consult your functional consultant for recording.
    Regards and Best wishes.

  • BAPI for Source List Upload ( ME01 )

    Hi All..
    Is there any BAPI available for uploading source list for a material??
    Transaction involved - ME01.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Nidhi

    Hi,
    Try the below function module ME_UPDATE_SOURCES_OF_SUPPLY which is being used by standard transaction ME01.
    sample code
    REPORT ZTEST.
    DATA: BEGIN OF XORD OCCURS 50.
    INCLUDE STRUCTURE EORD.
    DATA: UPDKZ,
    END OF XORD,
    YORD type table of EORD with header line.
    clear xord.
    clear yord.
    xord-MATNR = '100-100'.
    xord-WERKS = '3000'.
    xord-ZEORD = '00001'.
    xord-ERDAT = '20080403'.
    xord-ERNAM = 'SAPDEV02'.
    xord-VDATU = '20080403'.
    xord-BDATU = '20100510'.
    xord-LIFNR = '0000001000'.
    xord-FLIFN = 'X'.
    xord-EKORG = '1000'.
    xord-UPDKZ = 'U'.
    append xord.
    move-corresponding xord to yord.
    append yord.
    CALL FUNCTION 'ME_UPDATE_SOURCES_OF_SUPPLY' IN UPDATE TASK
    EXPORTING
    I_CHANGEDOCUMENT = 'X'
    TABLES
    XEORD = XORD
    YEORD = YORD.
    COMMIT WORK.
    Cheers,
    vasavi.v

  • Mass upload of Source List through LSMW

    Dear Experts,
    In our plant we have so many materials for which source list has not been maintained properly.Please,can any one tell me in detail how to do Mass upload of Source list through LSMW in detail.
    Please do reply me...
    Thanks in Advance...
    MK

    Hi,
    lsmw  with Idoc.
    Also use "Search Forum" with keywords "LSMW IDOC" in ABAP Development & you find many threads which explains you in detail.
    Hope this helps.
    Best Regards, Murugesh AS

  • Upload of source list data

    Do we have any BAPI for uploading the source list?
    Can we upload source list via LSMW and BDC?
    I am pretty new to upload/ migration, pl advice.

    Hi
    LSMW is simple one, whcih can easy to use for a functional consultant, for other ones need tech consultant assistance..
    the blw are the lsmw links ..
    http://www.sap123.com/showthread.php?t=98
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/7f/b6f45805b111d2b41c006094b944c8/content.htm
    http://www.mydatabus.com/visitor.php?pt=downloadFile&tc=6289701541332&cl=53&cn=000003&uid=6659
    http://www.erpgenie.com/sap/saptech/lsmw.htm
    /people/hema.rao/blog/2006/09/14/lsmw--step-by-step
    http://www.sap-img.com/sap-data-migration.htm
    http://www.erpgenie.com/sap/saptech/lsmw.htm
    http://www.allsaplinks.com/lsmw.html
    http://www.scmexpertonline.com/downloads/SCM_LSMW_StepsOnWeb.doc
    LSMW for Material Master
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/f6/ca0766a7a911d1950500a0c930e0da/frameset.htm

  • Mass upload of Source list

    Hi,
    Would like to upload mass source list for 3 plants & 2000+ materials
    In ME05 there is no provison of entering the vendor number
    Is there any way?
    Regards,
    Vengat

    Hello Vengata,
    Best way is to go for LSMW. In LSMW you will have to record the entire transaction with out any error while running the transaction. All the fields whaich you want to maintain in the transaction shall get recorded.
    After that excel template is required to be made for all the entered fields and then these fileds are required to be copied in txt file.
    This file would be uploaded during batch input session of LSMW. This can be created by Functional Consultant no ABAPer is required.
    This can also be achieved thru' BDC but ABAPer is required for creating BDC.
    I hope this would help you.
    With regards.
    Sanjay

  • Source List - Mass Change

    How to change source list in Mass?
    Like I have several materials for which source list is already created for more than one vendor for few materials.
    But MRP relevevant indicator "1" is missing.
    How to update the same in all materials for all vendors.

    Dear,
    If you want have all relevants data for creation of source list. You can create source list for upload source list.If you want to step by step guide document for creation of lsmw please give our mail id. Otherwise check MASS t-code for upload source list of material.
    If it is useful, Please revert back.
    Regards,
    Mahesh Wagh

  • BAPI or FM for Source List (ME01 TCode)

    Hello,
             I have a requirement to upload master data for Source List which is T-Code ME01. Now, as there is a Table Control in it, we are having trouble using LSMW because when there is more than 1 record for the given Material Plant Combination, it fails to handle the 2nd Record. There is a table Control in the T-Code ME01 in which if we go by the Recording in LSMW, we would have the 2nd Record overwrite the 1st Record when we actually try to upload the Data.
           So, is there a BAPI by which we can achieve this requirement? Please let me know.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Venkata Phani Prasad Konduri

    Hello Manjunath,
                                  I have neither used BDC or BAPI Method to upload SourceList but used the LSMW-IDOC method using;
    IDoc Type : SRCLST01
    Message Type : SRCLST
    Process Code : SRCL
    Inbound Posting Program : IDOC_INPUT_SRCLIST
                                 It worked fine for me. Try this out.
    Thank You,
    Venkata Phani Prasad K

  • How to maintain the source List if record already exist to maintain ME01

    Hi Folks,
    I've a BDC pgm for t-code ME01(Maitain Source list). which is for creating new contract before expirting one.  Here I am upload a TXT file which contains data like vendor, Plant, date(valid to-valid from), PurOrgn, Agreement ...
    But program is unable to manage the for updating the source list. The program also runs into a scenario where there are 2 Fixed, MRP Rel. lines with Overlapping Validity Period. 
    The program also does not return a proper error message informing the user there is a problem updating the Source List u2013 program simply tell. the user the program is unable to process the file.  When user tries to reprocess the upload file they are unable to do so since a Contract with the same conditions has already been created.
    points will be allocated for good solution
    Thanks in Advance,
    Venkat
    Edited by: venkat n on Oct 20, 2008 6:18 PM

    Hi
    Check out the link -
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/StepstocreateasimpleLSMWusingbatchinput+recording
    lsmw for data migration for  xk01 transaction
    http://www.sap-img.com/general/lsmw-steps-for-data-migration.htm
    Regards
    Anand

  • Mass Change of Source List

    Hi,
    Our requirement is to Mass change of Source list.
    The field to be changed is to remove the MRP relevant Indicator from Sourcelist.
    How to do as mass?
    Vengat

    Hi
    As there is no standard t.code for Mass changes to Source list in sap, your requirement can be acheived by
    1. Creating a ABAP program with the help of ABPERS
    2.If you know LSMW creation .. create a LSMW for Sourcelist creation giving the inputs as Material , Vendor and MRP indicator.
       Take all the info records Material & Vendor from the table EORD.
       Put them in the excel sheet and leave the field AUTET (MRP indicator) blank in the upload format.
       Run the LSMW for all the records
    while using the second option, test intially for few records and once its good go for all the records

  • How can I remove Facebook from the iPhoto source list?

    Lately when I use iPhoto it will not let me quit and I have to force quit. I recently moved to college where there are several separate internet routers. I realized I still had iPhoto sharing turned on from using it at home and thought that might be messing it up, but even after I turn off sharing it will not let me quit. I think it is a problem with Facebook because it asks, "still syncing would you like to stop and quit?" whenever I try to quit the program. I would like to just remove Facebook from my source list, but I can't figure out how. It used to ask me to sign in to Facebook if I wanted to upload pictures but now it doesn't so I have no idea how to make it quit syncing.

    I found the solution in the community
    Solution 1
    Mac OS: Run the uninstaller in the Applications/Utilities/Adobe Installers folder to remove the program listed as up-to-date.
    Windows: Use the Programs And Features Control Panel to remove the program listed as up-to-date.

  • Can't update/restore after intalling itunes 7.0  or see ipod in source list

    I have a complicated issue. I just installed itunes 7.0 and my ipod won't show up in the source list (which had been a problem before with 6.0). Thinking this had to do with my Toshiba laptop, I disabled my high-speed usb port. But one of the later steps (to fix the toshiba problem) is to open the ipod updater and then restore the ipod. I can't do either of these because for some reason my updater is the 6.0 version still and gives me an error saying it's no longer supported and i have to use itunes to update (which I can't). I don't know what to do! I need help!
    Toshiba Laptop   Windows XP  
    Toshiba Laptop   Windows XP  

    Hey there
    I had issues trying to update my ipod (60g) after upgrading to itunes 7. Finally figured it out!!! I had to disable my Norton internet security - firewall and everything worked fine!!! It took maybe 10-15 mins to update the ipod to version 1.2 - then another 30 minutes to upload all my podcasts. I have no idea why it uploaded each one. Almost like during the update to version 1.2 - my podcasts (only the podcasts) were deleted and then reloaded again. Weird!!!
    SO... hopefully you have a firewall that you can disable for about maybe 30 mins - just enough time to let the ipod update then you should be good. took me 4 friggin days to figure this one out!!!!
    Hope this helps!!

  • Source list mass blocking of vendor

    dear all,
    ply give me transaction code for source list in which i can block vendors.
    i have created an LSMW tool also but it creates an double entry in the transaction ME01.
    we have even crated BDC but there also same error is occuring.
    so is there any other ways for doing mass changes
    regards
    amey

    One option is thru ME05 transaction, which is generate source list.
    You get a list, there you can filter (e.g. by vendor) and then set block indicator.
    Alternative, if you just want block the vendor, then use MK05 and block this vendor for procurement,
    And about your LSMW and BDC, you are just not hitting the existing source list records, hence you create new ones. You probably have to enhance the key. Lookup table EORD to see what you may need to hit an existing record.

  • Should/can the install script included in source=() list?

    Hi,
    It is a good thing that the sources needed to build a package are md5summed for integrity, but in most packages the install script is not. I was thinking why this might be - the PKGBUILD can be expected to modify the script?
      So to try, in one of my packages I added the install script to the source=() list. The package builds of course just fine. Then, however, if I want to upload it to AUR, I try to make a source-only package with "makepkg --source", which brakes with something like this:
    ln: creating symbolic link `/tmp/foo/srclinks.YjYgQ8XlE/foo/foo.install': File exists
    This is because makepkg tries to create a 2 symbolic links with the same filename: one link for the "foo.install" in the source=() list and also for the install=() list....
    Is this deliberate, or a bug? Looks more like a bug to me, but thought I better ask first....
    Cheers,
    Greg

    shining wrote:
    imrehg wrote:
    It might be completely internal to the pacman but defines actions taken on the system - thus whatever is in .install has effects just like the rest of the files, maybe even more: the other files are just copied, the .install is executed.
    And while it might never get installed on the system, it's internals are - how else one could define a "post_uninstall()" if it wasn't stored? Being pacman developer you know much more about this than I do, can you give a bit of info on that?
    Right it is installed to pacman database, but again, it is pacman doing all that.
    Fair enough.... The detail, however, that is not installed does not preempt checksumming. Eg. patches are also: 1) used for the package, 2) not installed, and 3) still in the checksum....
    shining wrote:
    All I'm trying to get to, is there any serious reason (technical, not philosophical) NOT to checksum the install script as well?  Because I'm yet to see any valid arguments against it, and there are loads for it....
    Taking your example from kernel26 :
    -i $startdir/kernel26.install
    -i ${pkgdir}/etc/mkinitcpio.d/${pkgname}.preset
    Note that the scriptlet edited is the original one in $startdir , because that's the only place where it needs to be, from the packager pov.
    While for the preset file, it needs to be copied to $pkgdir and it is edited there.
    If you had a checksum for the scriptlet, it would also mean that makepkg -g output could be altered after running makepkg. Very weird..
    Ok, this is indeed the case. But if you look at real packages, it seems that after the package is compiled, many times they update the PKGBUILD with the new md5sum values. Again: core/kernel26.
    That .install update section in the PKGBUILD is then relegated to a "helper function" role that keep the information in sync when there's a new release, but as the PKGBUILD is distributed, it won't change anything in the .install anymore...
    Thus, again, there's no real difference between the .install files and other files used as source.
    shining wrote:Btw the whole scriptlet file could be created entirely from the pkgbuild build function.
    Sure, and that's a great thing! I actually wondered why so many packages have separate .install when it can be done in the PKGBUILD. Thought it might be some convention, but probably just habit.... I prefer doing it in the PKGBUILD as well, whenever possible...
    shining wrote:There might be ways to fix that, though I don't even see any good ones. But why bother ? You said there are loads of valid arguments to have it , but you didn't even give one !
    On the other hand, I'm yet to find any of your rebuttals that are not rebutted here again...
    shining wrote:What are you worried about here ? Security ? If you think adding a checksum for the install file is going to give you any security, you are badly fooling yourself. If someone is distributing a malicious pkgbuild, it can contain the md5sum of the malicious scriptlet which is shipped with it.
    I think you misunderstood me. I'm not complaining, but inquiring. The PKGBUILD system is awesome, and it makes me search out programs that I use but not in the repo/AUR so that I can make a new package. But also, I'm interested in the "how" and "why", and hope to improve things if possible. Now, to me it seems theres an unreasonable distinction to checksum some files needed for a package but not all of them. And thus I set out to ask the elders here on the Forum to see whether someone can shed light on the reasons of the current state. Not trying to piss of anybody, but being interested.
    Of course the md5sum is not security, it's a help, nothing more.
    As an example: some time ago, there was a package in the community (thus managed by TUs) that had an update. I wanted to check out something in the package, got the PKGBUILD and tried to make it myself - md5sum says that the sources are incorrect.... Obviously something must have gone very bad, because the md5sum field was updated according to the SVN, the package is available on pacman thus it had to build, and the sources used in the package have not been changed for a while so that cannot be a problem....
    I've got a package from a trusted source and it is broken, the md5sum told me. So the breakage can be the very same way in the install script, why is the md5sum not allowed to tell me that?
    shining wrote:The only security for pkgbuilds is yourself. When you get one from a strange place, you MUST read the pkgbuild/install files.
    Of course, never argued against it. But there are different layers of verbosity....
    Anyway....

  • Ipod icon not in 'source' list

    HELP! On accedent...(I didn't think I needed to read the manual because by brother was showing me how to work it) I disconected the iPod when it said 'do not disconnect' just a couple of times. Is that a big deal? Only once has the little ipod icon appeared in the 'source' list. It isn't appearing now. It won't download or upload (or whatever) my other songs that I just put into my library. I tried 'authorizing' and 'deauthorizing'. It worked once, but it won't work now. Apparently, a bunch of people are having trouble with iTunes 5.0. Apple are you out there? What do I do? ANYBODY...PLEASE HELP!!!

    Never mind I sort of fixed that. I REregistered my ipod, and now it recognizes my ipod. But it won't let me load on the songs I bought from the music store, only the songs from my cd's. I tried to deauthorize my computer, but I don't think that did anything. That may be because I don't have the main desktop, I have my own seperate desktop. If you know what to do...please tell me!!

Maybe you are looking for