LSMW transport problem !!

Hi ,
I have transported a LSMW project.but in test and production system the LSMWs are NOT working fine.They are behaving strangely rather.
One LSMW is picking up the screen for another !!!
I chekced the tables and they are fine in all the 3 systemthe programs used by the LSMWs
are not the same (these are system generated programs).
Any idea why this is happening and how to fix this ?
Regards,
Sandip.

Dear,
In LSMW application tool bar, click USER MENU, and check GENERATE READ DATA PROGRAM and GENERATE CONVERT DATA PROGRAM.
Then in the main screen execute these two steps could fix.
Cheers,
Norman

Similar Messages

Transformation transport problems when containing routine

Hi Gurus,
I'm facing a transport problem.
When i want to transport a transformation that contains routines, the transport says syntax error in routine. The routine in DEV is tested and correct. I realised, that the transport does not bring the routines. After transport, i open the transformation, and the routines contain the default routine: RESULT = .
I found some answers in some posts, but no exact answer how can i get rid of this transport problem. I don't like copy - paste into prod system with manually editing....
If you have any idea, please let me know.
Thanks
Laszlo

Thanks for your help, it worked now, but i think it should work without owerwrite originals. Sometimes it seems that the routines is not included in the transport request, when i modify a routine in a transformation.
But thanks anyway, problem solved now

LSMW - Transport

Hi Guru's,
I created a LSMW in the development client and i was able to load data. I transfered the LSMW to Quality environment and it looked like it transfered okie. All the mapping, source fields everything looks just as in developments.
I started to load the data i was able to get to the step Convert data then i got a error message stating
Syntax error in program /1CADMC/SAP_LSMW_CONV_00000003
in include /1CADMC/SAP_LSMW_CONV_00000003
in line 27
For type "C", a maximum length specification of 65535 is allowed.
So i went to SE38 called up 1CADMC/SAP_LSMW_CONV_00000003
It looks like in development the program automatically changed the length of the fields but in Quality it's not.
I wonder if i transported it correctly - can someone please tell me how i can transfer the LSMW correctly?? or how i can ix this current issue?
Thank you
Best Regards,
Noopers

Hi Noopers,
from what i gather is, ur Transport has moved in Quality system . However, the character Conversion si still aint working fine in Quality system where as it works fine in the development system.
Kindly do the following checks:
-> Test the LSMW in dev to ensure it works fine there
-> Ensure the lsmw transport as mentioned in the post above is done correctly
-> Chcek if the Dev and Quality systems are of the same version
Let us know about the above chck points. We could help you better
Thanks

Open Hub transporting problems

Hi everybody, we have Open Hub transporting problems, it just gives us return code 12 or 8, basically, it doen't want to transport neither Open Hub Destination, nor Transformations, nor DTPs, and bear in mind that we're on the 15th Patch Level. We've looked at all the SAP Notes, but they reffer to the earlier patch levels...
And other problem, is that it's OK in DEV system but in QUALITY system, when you launch a DTP it gives us a dumb with ASSIGN_TYPE_ERROR
Any ideas??

My destination path on the DEV box is simply the following (identified by BID in the following path):
D:\usr\sap\BID\DVEBMGS00\work
And when I locate the un-activated open hub on the QA box, the BID is already changed to BIQ, but the server name box/field is empty....
I am going to try with the object changebility option, btw, is there any documentation on how to change these objects that are marked with object changebility on the QA box (provided that we can not manually change anything on the QA box)...
Anyways, I think my problem is with the server name conversion from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa"....!!!
Also, please note the RSBFILE entry for this object in the QA box has the "btcsrvname" as blank...
Do you think there is any additional setting that needs to be done on the QA box to do this translation (from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa")?
The only two setup we have done as far as the BI is concerned is at the "Tools-> Conversion of logical system name"....where you only put the conversion for client name mapping from dev to qa and local file system mapping from dev to qa.
So, is there anything else to map the host name (from "abc-bi-dev" to "abc-bi-qa") either at BI perspective or Basis/NetWeaver perspective?
Thanks a lot...
~Sabuj.
Edited by: Sabuj Haque on Feb 1, 2009 1:11 PM
Edited by: Sabuj Haque on Feb 1, 2009 5:34 PM

The Object cannot not be processed due to a transport problem

We are trying to delete a standard web template 0ADHOC_TABLE (modified by our coworker before and transported) and reinstall a new one or totally standard one, but when clicking the "X" icon to delete this web template, get the following error:
"The Object cannot not be processed due to a transport problem"
What could be the reason?
Thanks

Hi Kevin,
This message coms up because as you mention, the template has been transported. Since it is in the target system, if you delete form the dev system, the system needs to ensure that it is also removed from the system it has been transported too.
You can check the dev package assigned to the template, assign a new request against this dev class (RSA1 > Transport Connection > Bex Truck icon). Log out and log back into WAD and try to delete it, and then send this transport. Or you can simply reinstall it as Roberto suggests.
Hope this helps...

SNP-- LSMW-- Transportation Lane

Hi,
When we are doing LSMW for Transporation Lane creation in APO SNP, system unable to recongize the Pop-Up screen, due to that its not updating record.
It showing all values after converted data, but, when system unable to feed the value to populate the sub screen.
Kindly guide to overcome this problem.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
LSMW does not recognize pop up, to avoid the pop-up you need to check the flags fix trsp duration and fix trsp distance and enter a value for both (dummy value in case you dont require any of these fields), the pop-up generate proposal will not appear.
But I think creating transportation lane using BAPI is a better and faster option in case you have got large number of lanes.
Thanks,
Sanjog

Multiprovider transport problem

Hello Friends ,
While transporting the multiprovider from BW Development to BW Testing system I am getting following error in the Log display of BW Testing System,
R3TRMPRO***(Multiprovider name) was repaired in this system.
The log display for the Delevelopment system shows messages 'Feedback after export or import'--'Successfully Completed'
But the problem occurs in BW Testing system ,
and we are getting the above error message ,
Import--(8) Ended with errors
please suggest solution .
Thanks in advance.

Hello A.H.P ,
Thanks for valuable suggestion.
I think someone has directly repair this multiprovider in Testing system.
I will do the required steps as suggested by you.
Agains thanks very much .
Message was edited by: Amol Kulkarni

Source System Does Not Exist - Transport Problem

Hi
We have the next Landscape in BW 7.0 (Netweaver 2004's)
LRDCLNT300     is R3 DEV
LRQCLNT700     is R3 QA
LBDCLNT100     is BW DEV
LBQCLNT700     is BW QA
The connections are
LBDCLNT100 (BW Dev) use as source system        LRDCLNT300 (R3 Dev)
LBQCLNT700 (BW QA) use as source system        LRQCLNT700 (R3 QA)
In RSA1->TOOLS -> Conversion of Logical System Names
In Conversion of source system after the transport we have these entries
Source System                    Target System
LBDCLNT100 (BW Dev)         LBQCLNT700 (BW QA)
LRDCLNT300 (R3   Dev)         LRQCLNT700 (BW QA)
But when we transport an order from BW DEV to BW QA show the error "source system LRDCLNT300 does not exist"
Never made the conversion of source system after the transport.
Can you help us please.

Thanks Edwin
     I create a RFC for LRDCLNT300 (R3 Dev) in my BW QA system (Target System).
I try an order again but it didn't work, also I try to check 7.0 checkbox but I got the message "No entry exists for original source system LBDCLNT100 for 3.x object"
and I have to uncheck again.
I still have the same problem the objects are associated to R3 Dev, never make the conversion to R3 QA.

Query Transportation Problem?

Hi Guru's,
We are working in Bw 3.5 Version
Query: We have observed that there was a problem with Query in Dev & Quality Server?
as per the regular activities we have modeled the entire process in Dev
from data Source to Data target
then we have developed a report on this data target.
all this was saved under one Request and transported to Quality.
then there was some modifications in update rules & and also in Bex report
for this also we have sent under one request to Quality
there we have observed that the modifications in update rules have been applied
& in report this modifications did nnot apply in Quality server
Can any one help in this ............
advance thanks ,very very urgent..
Points will be rewarded >
Hari

Hi,
I have the same problem. I have a query in production and I need to change it. I changed it in dev, transported the query with no error, but I don't see the changes in prod.
There is any configuration error? Normal transports work fine.
Thanks

Transportation problem in Dev system

Hello All,
I am getting the problem in Transportation. While i am transporting the request from Dev to Quality, the problem is comming in Export. please see the bellow error messages.
Exports with Errors       No Further Transport
    TBD TB Development
            TBD        TB Development
                       Pre-Export Methods                       29.12.2008 13:00:01    (0) Successfully Completed
                       Export                                   30.12.2008 08:47:19 In process: Requires update
                Import steps not specific to transport request
in the log bellow messages are displaying.
   [dev trc     ,00000] Mon Dec 29 13:00:07 2008                          760684 0.760684
   [dev trc     ,00000] Disconnecting from ALL connections:                   10 0.760694
   [dev trc     ,00000] Disconnecting from connection 0 ...                   26 0.760720
   [dev trc     ,00000] Now I'm disconnected from SAP DB                    2370 0.763090
   [dev trc     ,00000] Disconnected from connection 0                        14 0.763104
   [dev trc     ,00000] statistics db_con_commit (com_total=2, com_tx=2)
                                                                                13 0.763117
   [dev trc     ,00000] statistics db_con_rollback (roll_total=0, roll_tx=0)
                                                                                13 0.763130
Disconnected from database.
End of Transport (0000).
date&time: 29.12.2008 - 13:00:07
Please let me know the solution for the above issue, i will assign full points.
Regards
KK

Hi,
Your Error statement COMMIT shows that the sytem has submittted the request to make connection with the system.
But it immediately gives CON_ROLLBACK (statement) error, which generally happens, there is not enough space in your quality system. therefore the Rollback of the submitted request happens.
Check the DB space in ur Qual system and speak to your BASIS team, so that it can increase the DB size and also, u can urself clean the system.

Lsmw date problem

hi friends,
i am trying to upload po using lsmw by direct input method.
only problem is it is not taking delivery date properly.
at the end error message is 'plz enter valid delivery date'.
can any one tell me why it is happning.
thanks
sonu

and this also
BAPI method
http://****************/Tutorials/LSMW/BAPIinLSMW/BL2.htm
Check out this thread
LSMW - Using a BAPI
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/d4/0a43a124e8924ea890cf0855860db5/content.htm

Workflow rule transporting problem

Hi,
When i am trying to transport rule to from dev system to client system it is not getting copied can any body tell how to copy the rule data from dev to c system

Hi!!!
Thanks for ur prompt helps. Actually instead of OBJECTID I was passing the Obj-key and not the OBJECTID. This was creating problem. But still dont know why it was creating the prob.
Anyways THANKS A LOT.
Regards,
Sudipto.

Transport problem - newest versions overwrite by olders during transport

Hello everybody!
I am writing my master thesis, which mainly focuses on problems with transport in SAP, precisely with data inconsistence.
Let's consider the following situation:
In DEV:
1) Create change request R1 containing object O(1),
2) Release R1
3) Create change request R2 containing the newer version of object - O(2)
4) Release R2
In PRD:
1) Import R2 (using Single Import)
2) Import R1
... thus then an older version O(1) is in PRD instead of O(2).
The presented situation is very trivial, however the transport could consist of plenty requests, which contain plenty objects under different requests. If in this case because of some reasons the Single Import is necessary (like some organization prevents from performing an immediate full transport), the transport administrator has to examine all other requests from an import queue, in order to check, if this Single Import do not cause any inconstistencies.
Is there already any tool, which can fully or partly automize this process?
Or maybe anybody has an idea to ensure that the transport is relevant?
On of the solutions is checking every object under all of requests and comparing their versions. Is this effective? Does it totally solve the problem? Does any tool supporting this solution exist?
Do you maybe have any other ideas to solve this problem?
I would be very thankful for your help!
Best regards,
MZ

Thomas:
As far as I understood, you suggest the solution, which would compare timestamp of every object versions. How can I "receive" the information about it? And when should the versions be checked (I mean, before releasing requests, or maybe after releasing, but before import)?
Uwe:
But what if because of some reasons, just one request of this created "request" set is needed? Sometimes Single Imports does not cause any problems and could be even one of the transport strategy. I was thinking more a solution, which would enable a Single Import, but would not allow for data inconsistencies, caused by overwriting the newest version by older versions.
BTW, I was not aware of the fact, that there is no locking in case of customizing requests, thus thank you. To be honest, I do not see any point why in case of Workbench Requests we lock objects, and in case of Customizing Requests we do not. In my opinion it just causes additional problems. Maybe you know, why SAP solved it like that? What kind of advantages does it give? Of course this problem is also interesting.
Sandra:
Yes, DEV+PRD was just to introduce the main idea. The transactions you gave can be of course helpful to find an error, but I was thinking more about comparing versions under two change requests, before the objects are imported to the target system (not between two systems).
Best regards,
Marcin

ABAP Query transport problem

Dear All,
I need to copy queries from Standard Area to Global area. When I use the transport facility (SQ03 --> Environment --> transport), it does pop-up the transport workbench request screen at the first time. I created one transport request number for it. After that, I accidently deleted the transport request without released it first. Now I have problem to add back the queries into the new transport request since the prompt for transport workbench request is not pop-up even I successfully copied the query from standard area to global area.
Is there any suggested solution?. Thank you in advance for any suggestion.
Edited by: shahrir razlan on Apr 16, 2008 6:36 PM
Edited by: shahrir razlan on Apr 16, 2008 6:37 PM

chances are very very slim.. (i think zero) to delete a request, when it has objects .
so your statement - "I accidently deleted the transport request without released it first " doesnt sounds logical...
either you have removed your objects from the list before deleting the request..
but if that was teh case, then it shud pop up for new request..
as it is not asking for new request.... it is almost sure, that it is still in some request..
look hard in se01 - your request shud be there... description shud be something like 'transport for abap query'.

Re: Transport problem of SAP Query in Global Area

Hi All,
I am facing a problem in transporting the query which is created in Global area.
I created a Query in Global Area and saved in a Transport Request. Now i created a Transaction code for this query by taking the Program name generated by this Query.
then i released the TR to Quality sys, which contains User Group, Infoset, Query & Transaction code. I see User Group & Infoset in my Quality sys but i dont see th Query & Transaction code assigned to this Query, and when i try to run the transaction code assigned to this query its giving dump saying 'LOAD_PROGRAM_NOT_FOUND'.
Could anyone please help me in resolving this..am i missing any steps here...kindly do the needful...
Regards,
Pavan

Hi i solved my problem by myself.
I have to set Query as external available and have to use the MDX Query.
Its strange because if i build a new report the query dont have to be set as external available.

LSMW transport problem !!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for