LSX-00285: referenced key "SHELL DETERMINATION" is not defined

After successfully registering our multiple XSDs, when we try to validate a generated xml file, we receive LSX-00285: referenced key error.
We are using 11.1.0.6 enterprise on a RHEL5 system.
The same xml file will validate using XMLSpy. The key in reference does show up in the list that is defined before it is used in a detail element later in the xml file. If I remove the record that it references, two other elements pointing to the same list with a different key will validate no problem. I'm thinking it might have to do with a referenced key from an attribute of an element and not a element. Again, that works fine in XMLSpy but it may be an issue with XMLDB.
Any thoughts?

This question is better suited for the {forum:id=34} forum. When reposting, include the DDL for how the schemas were registered and how you are trying to validate. If possible, try to shrink everything down to make the test case as small as possible so schemas/xml can be posted to the forum as well.

Similar Messages

Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not define

Hi,
I'm trying to post an IDOC of type BBPIV through XI to an R/3 system.
The posted idoc in R/3 is in status 51 (Application document not posted) with the error message "Acct determination for Account-assigned purchase order with keys not defined in chart of acts WP2P"
As per my understanding this is something related to FI.
Long text of the error is "The system cannot generate an automatic posting because there is no account determination defined for Account-assigned purchase order with keys in chart of accounts WP2P.
Correct the account determination for Account-assigned purchase order"
Please help me how to solve this.
Regards,
Rashmi

Hiya,
This looks like its a MM posting / transaction.
You need to go to OBYC and maintain the account assignment. If you provide the business scenario (GR into Stock, Subcontracting, etc.) for the process, I may be able to help.
VKOA is for SD account assignment and I don't believe you can use that here.
Cheers.

"Acct determination not defined for trans. ZDI"

Hello everyone,
I made a payments to vendor and customer invoices with payment differences. What i mean is, i had an invoice for $1000 and i made a payment of $995 only. That difference should go to permitted payment difference.. when i was trying to post it ,am getting an error msg "Acct determination not defined for trans. ZDI in chart of accts DPSD" DPSD is my chart of account. I created the tolerance group for $50 and 5%.Iam unable to post the partial and residual payments also. What are the steps need to follow? Where i did a mistake?
It would be very helpful if anyone helps me to reslove this issue..
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sweety.

Hi Christian,
Thank you for your quick responce.. When i entered the table to30 and given the chart of account to see all the accounts that are linked to the trancsaction key ZDI in SE16n. Getting an error msg " Table TO30 is not active in the Dictionary Message no. MO402 " am still in confustion.. Could you please help me in doing partial and residual payments also if you can. because it is not accepting to post the amount. What i mean is i posted and invoice for $1000 and paid a partial payement for $500 in f-53. Do know where i did a mistake in making partial and residual payements..
Thank you for your support.
Regards.

Output determination does not happen during Sales Document creation

Hello All,
I am facing an issue where the automatic output determination does not happen when the Sales Order is created. Let me explain a bit on the background.
Output type ZDL2 has been defined as a special function (TNAPR-NACHA = 8) attached to a custom program and Form routine to create Outbound delivery after successful posting of the sales order.
Condition records are maintained to trigger this output for the Key Combination of Sales Org/Distrib Channel/Division/Route. Access sequence has also been correctly maintained for the above fields.
When the Sales order is saved, the output is supposed to be triggered but out of several sales orders created, it triggered for just one document. We have no clues on what could be the issue.
One question here is, can we have the access sequence maintained for the fields from both header and item level (ie KOMKBV1 and KOMPBV1). Please be reminded that, in our case, the field ROUTE comes from the field catalog KOMPBV1.
Another point which we noticed is that, the Function Module COMMUNICATION_AREA_KOMPBV1 which is supposed to fill the Item data Communication structure for output determination was never called.
Has anyone came across such situations. Comments or suggestions are really appreciated.
Kind Regards
Sabu Kuriakose

Sabu Kuriakose,
Since you are using ROUTE as one parameter for the condition table, and it is at the item level.
the output is triggered at the header level.
So a sales order can contain multiple items with different routes. so at header level how will u identify the route ?
the fields might be available for creatign the condition table but the problem is the fields should get the value during order processing.
in the analsysis screen you will know that the field is getting the value of the ROUTE or not ?
also for creating a delivery you need a shipping point. same as above you can hae multiple items with different shipping points. how will u consider that scenario.
If you can explain that, then that will be helpful to answer your problem.

In my numeric key pad I can not use the (.) dot because it has a (,) and it is not working in calculations. What I can do?

In my numeric key pad I can not use the decimal dot (.) because it has a (,) and this not work with decimal calculations. What I can do? Help ………

IT NOT WORK IN MEXICO. THANKS A LOT. BEST REGARDS. MANUEL LOPEZ
El 6/2/2015, a las 16:50, Apple Support Communities Updates <[email protected]> escribió:
You received a reply
SGIII has replied to your question. You can view the full discussion in Apple Support Communities.
In my numeric key pad I can not use the (.) dot because it has a (,) and it is not working in calculations. What I can do?
Correct Answer Helpful Answer
Use the buttons above to tell SGIII and the rest of the community if this reply solved your question or helped you get closer to finding a solution.
To reply to SGIII, go to the discussion in Apple Support Communities.
You are receiving this email from Apple Support Communities. You can change your email preferences in your Apple Support Communities Profile.
TM and copyright © 2014 Apple Inc. 1 Infinite Loop, MS 96-DM. Cupertino, CA 95014.
All Rights Reserved | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Apple Support

Short key for copy does not work all the time now.

After I have installed the latest OSX - Yosemite, my short key for copy does not work all the time. It is infrequent how it works. I'm using the same keyboard that I have always used, my wireless logitech keyboard for mac. Please help.

I've plugged in my default mac keyboard and the short key copy still does not work.

Error Message F5 788 'Reconciliation account ... or short key ... is not pe

'Reconciliation account ... or short key ... is not permitted'.
Dear experts,
When i try to perform a posting for lease in contract i get the above mentioned error message. I dont have a problem when in my contract i ve got only one condition entered referring to one BP with vendor role. But when i try to perform the posting for a contract having two conditions with two different BPs the system generates the message. I tried to find sth in the OSS notes, but nothing relevant for the case
Any help will be appreciated
Thanks,
Severina

Hi Severina,
please check your customizing settings concerning account assignment of the flow types that are used for postings. Are there reconciliation accounts defined that are deviating from the reconciliation accounts in the master data of the vendors?
Regards, Franz

Few keys in Keyboard is not working.

Few days back my laptop( HP Pavilion G6) screen got froze(Laptop starting but no display, caps key blinking 3 times) so i checked on internet and come to know its may be because of error in memory module. So i put my RAM in other slot. Now my laptop started but a new issue occured.
Now my caps, B,N ,Del keys in keyboard is not working. I am using Windows 7(64 bit)
Please help me with this issue.

Hi
Please find the steps given below might help you to fix your issue.
Go to device manager & uninstall the keyboard driver and restart the unit.
Please update the driver for Bios.
Try doing a system restore to the date where unit was working fine.
Open command prompt type the letter and check if does not work you might have to replace the keyboard itself.
Let us know how it goes!
"I work for HP."
****Click the (purple thumbs up icon in the lower right corner of a post) to say thanks****
****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
Regards
Manjunath

Form of address key is not defined - Message AM117-VL02N

I have defined a COA for the customer when there is a PGI for that customer.
When I do the PGI i am getting update termination error - Form of address key is not defined.
As per the message it says that TSAD3T - TITLE is not maintained. But I see the customer master it is maintained as 'Company'.
Also when I remove the Title using XD02 also i am getting the same message.
Please let me know what settings and changes i need to do for PGI to happen.

Hi,
check in customizing what form has been assigned and check the form. It sound like somebody created a form (SAPscript, Smartforms, Adobe Forms) for the billing document and there´s no window on it for the address or it has another name.

IDoc TO File: Receiver Determination did not find any receivers at all

Hi,
We have IDoc to file scenario, where based on attributes present in IDoc we have configured different receivers.
Everything was working fine and files were getting created based on the receiver determination criteria.
But there is one change done in custom IDoc to re position the attributes.
Idoc before changes was having NAME1 and NAME2 above KATR6 and KATR7 and after change it looks like below:
So there is no change in segment and no change in mapping but the attributes KATR6 and KATR7 are used to determine the receiver.
Cache refresh is done for both ESR and ID. I have re - entered the receiver determination criteria just to ensure that change should reflect.
But still when I am triggering outbound IDoc from ECC to PI, the transaction is getting errored out with below error:
"ErrText": "Processing error = Receiver Determination did not find any receivers at all",
Can any one providee some idea what could be the reason and what is the right approach to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Vertika

Hi Krupa,
I have marked your answer as helpful answer and delete of metadata wasn't required.
Reload works . But thanks for your suggestion.
Thanks,
Vertika

My old computer crashed and I am trying to download Adobe X Pro on my computer. I have tried to download and the only download I can find is the Adobe XI Pro. Any help would be appreciated. I have the product key but it's not deactivated on my old compute

My old computer crashed and I am trying to download Adobe X Pro on my computer. I have tried to download and the only download I can find is the Adobe XI Pro. Any help would be appreciated. I have the product key but it's not deactivated on my old computer.

if you need to deactivate, contact adobe support
https://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html
Downloads available:
Suites and Programs: CC 2014 | CC | CS6 | CS5.5 | CS5 | CS4 | CS3
Acrobat: XI, X | 9,8 | 9 standard
Premiere Elements: 13 |12 | 11, 10 | 9, 8, 7
Photoshop Elements: 13 |12 | 11, 10 | 9,8,7
Lightroom: 5.6| 5 | 4 | 3
Captivate: 8 | 7 | 6 | 5
Contribute: CS5 | CS4, CS3
Download and installation help for Adobe links
Download and installation help for Prodesigntools links are listed on most linked pages. They are critical; especially steps 1, 2 and 3. If you click a link that does not have those steps listed, open a second window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.
window using the Lightroom 3 link to see those 'Important Instructions'.

I would like to detect all the keyboard key is okay, but not every key can be detected by using LabVIEW example, keyboard keycode

I would like to detect all the keyboard key is okay, but not every key can be detected by LabVIEW example ( we can use 『basic input demo.vi』to detect normal key』.
I want to detect some 『hot key』 for example some keys exist in the upper part like 『search key』、『e-mail key』、『volumn control key』...etc. They are very often to be watched in some new keyboards, but we still don't know how to detect if their functions are okay.
Can we detect signals of these 『hot key』 in LabVIEW? We can apply these hot key's functions in XP, so we should detect their signal, I think, but I can't do it.
I serach some information about this question, and somebody said we can detect hot key's signal by grabing 『keybode』 these hot key feedback. But I don't know how to do these. I can't use VC. So anyone can give me a LabVIEW VI to grab keycode? Or any other solution we can detect all the key on the keyboard, including hot keys?
Thanks!
Regards,

Maybe that is the limitation of Acquire Input Data.vi.The vi can't identify the Unformal key.
You can try to use Event structure and set to listen "key down" event.
There are two terminals VKey, ScanCode will sent out the information when you press key.
There are two pictures in attached file, 2.jpg will show you the detail.
Good luck.
Attachments:
SpecialKey.zip ‏17 KB

Enhanced Interface Determination - does not work!

Hi guys,
well i have a scenario where i have done a multi mapping where MT_TYPSCH is generated for each new value which occurs in one special source field.
<NO>1</NO>
<NO>2</NO>
<NO>3</NO>
..so three MT will be generated.
Now i would like these messages devided to different Business Services where each one has on FTP-CC to write a file with a certain filename, e.g. File1.txt, File2.txt, File3.txt.
Therefore i thought i use different receivers in Receiver Determination with using Conditions and pointing to a value in field with XPATH. So depending on field <NO> the message should be routed to the given receiver targets.
I surely use the enhanced Interface Determination because i use multi mapping.
But when i run test, i receive 3 files with different names but same content. For me the receiver determination is not working that good.
Can someone help me on this?!
source:
<ZBC0>
<IDOC BEGIN="">
<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
<ZBC0 SEGMENT=""> 0...9999
<NO>1</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</ZBC0>
<ZBC0 SEGMENT="1">
<NO>2</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</IDOC>
</ZBC0>
target:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MT_TYPSCH> 1..1
<TYPSCHRecordSet> 1..1
<TYPSCHDetailsStruc> 1..unbounded
<FELD1/> {represents content of <No>}
<FELD2/>
<FELD3/>
</TYPSCHDetailsStruc>
</TYPSCHRecordSet>
</MT_TYPSCH>

Hi Mario,
ok here is my requirement.
We get ONE IDoc in which several items are listed. These have one field <NO> which can have the values 1,2 and 3. Depending on this value the items should be collected and written to different files on FTP.
My approach is that i divide all the items in mapping in different Message Types. This MT should be routet to different business services which has one CC to write on FTP.
To get the items with e.g. <NO>1</NO> i took condition in reciever determination using xpath. ((/ZBC21/IDOC/ZBC21/NO = 1).
So depending on the mapping everything runs - in my point of view but the different messages are not routed to the different services to write them to different files.
Source
<ZBC0>
<IDOC BEGIN="">
<EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="">
<ZBC0 SEGMENT=""> 0...9999
<NO>1</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</ZBC0>
<ZBC0 SEGMENT="1">
<NO>2</NO>
<TYPE>1B20-6</TYPE>
<SPEC>152J</SPEC>
</IDOC>
</ZBC0>
target:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<MT_TYPSCH> 1..1
<TYPSCHRecordSet> 1..1
<TYPSCHDetailsStruc> 1..unbounded
<FELD1/> {represents content of <NO>}
<FELD2/>
<FELD3/>
</TYPSCHDetailsStruc>
</TYPSCHRecordSet>
</MT_TYPSCH>
The output should be files with content of items depending on field <NO>.
file1.txt (all items with <NO>1</NO>)
file2.txt
file3.txt
I hope i made it clearer!
br

Error: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.RetryControlException: Receiver Determination did not find any receivers at all

Hello,
I have an issue configuring a simple File Adapter Content Conversion, it will be great to give me some support as I'am new in the PO Environment.
Iam reading a flat file and trying to write into an XML in the same FTP server
I have a 1 to 1 Mapping as follows
And my Content Conversion at Sender side Looks like this
After running the configuration Iam getting following error message
Error: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.RetryControlException: Receiver Determination did not find any receivers at all
My System is the SAP Netweaver Process Intgration 7.4 single Java stack
Do you have any idea how to fix this issue?
Many thanks in advance
Khadim

Hi evrybody
I have enabled the tracing of ICO and have seen that my payload for the message mapping is ok,.
<ns:hartgeldbest_ERP_KT xmlns:ns="http://xxxxxx.de">
<Recordset>
<header>
     <gesellschaft>03</gesellschaft>
     <filiale>000</filiale>
     <satzart>11</satzart>
     <datum>00000000</datum>
     <kennzeichen>1</kennzeichen>
</header>
</Recordset>
</ns:hartgeldbest_ERP_KT>
The issue is on detrmining the RECEIVER in the Main-XML
<sap:Main xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:sap="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" versionMajor="3"versionMinor="1" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<sap:MessageClass>ApplicationMessage</sap:MessageClass>
<sap:ProcessingMode>asynchronous</sap:ProcessingMode>
<sap:MessageId>ae41678e-da87-11e3-cd0f-0000006831a2</sap:MessageId>
<sap:TimeSent>2014-05-13T10:16:43Z</sap:TimeSent>
<sap:Sender>
<sap:Party agency="http://sap.com/xi/XI" scheme="XIParty"/>
<sap:Service>CC_Hartgeldbest_File2Idoc</sap:Service>
</sap:Sender>
<sap:Receiver>
<sap:Party agency="" scheme=""/>
<sap:Service/>
</sap:Receiver>
<sap:Interface namespace="http://xxxxx.de">hartgeldbest_KT_async_out</sap:Interface>
</sap:Main>
Is it possible that the receiver is overwritten due to the Content Conversion? Because if I set my Message Protocol to "File" the receiver determination will work.
Any idea?
Thx
Khadim

Field Selection PTFF not defined , error key : RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE

While executing BAPI_PO_CREATE1 by using Adaptive RFC Model in Webdynpro
I was facing the following Error
Field Selection PTFF not defined , error key : RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE
But while trying to create BAPI_SALEORDER_CREATE is working properly with the same configuration.
If anyone come accross this issue please help me out

This is beacuase of some issues in the parameters that are passed and is rectified.
krishna

LSX-00285: referenced key "SHELL DETERMINATION" is not defined

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for