Lumi Imaging SDK Issue

Hi,
I've recently updated Lumia Imaging SDK to v 2 in my app and sometimes I started to get the below exception:
[TypeLoadException: Requested Windows Runtime type 'Lumia.Imaging.JpegTools' is not registered.]
    System.StubHelpers.StubHelpers.GetWinRTFactoryObject(IntPtr pCPCMD):0
    Lumia.Imaging.JpegTools.AutoResizeAsync(IBuffer jpegSource, AutoResizeConfiguration autoConfiguration):0
    Snaps23.Shared.Helpers.PhotoModel.<ResizeStreamAsync>d__13.MoveNext():0
[COMException: Class not registered (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80040154 (REGDB_E_CLASSNOTREG))]
I don't have Any CPU or x64 build configuration in my active solution configurations. The weird thing is that sometimes it works on simulator sometimes not, but it always throws that exception when the app is deployed on device.

Hi,
Some of you may have noticed a problem in Visual Studio 2013 Update 4: when consuming an SDK you may sometimes get a TypeLoadException; a type from the SDK could not be found during runtime and an exception was thrown.
This problem can be found described online in several places. If this is an active obstacle for anyone, the workaround is to grab the C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v12.0\AppxPackage\ Microsoft.Build.AppxPackage.dll
from a machine with VS 2013 Update 3 (where it was working), and replace it on a machine with VS 2013 Update 4.
This is effectively just copying a file from VS2013Update3 and using it from Update 4.
Just note, this fix is needed at App build time. If you are shipping an SDK, the consumers of the SDK need to apply this fix.

Similar Messages

Lumia Imaging SDK Issues

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn859600.aspx
i am following the instruction in the link above, however, when it runs to
// A cartoon effect is initialized with the selected image stream as source.
var imageSource =
new RandomAccessStreamImageSource(fileStream);
in the method private
async Task<bool> ApplyFilterAsync(StorageFile file)
it always had an exception says Requested Windows Runtime type 'Lumia.Imaging.RandomAccessStreamImageSource' is not registered
i have a Lumia Imaging SDK of version 2.0, which i download using the Nuget Manager in vs
and VS 2013 Express update 4
Could anyone please resolve my problem?
Appreciated!

Hello,
I’ve tested to add and use lumia imaging SDK in universal app project, the project did not produce such exception. Please try follow ken’s suggestion to check the type of your project and try narrow down this problem.
If you don’t know how to do, please submit a repro project to show the problem in detail on your OneDrive, then share a link here.
Regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Lumia Imaging SDK and PubCenter on WP8.1 RT : System.TypeLoadException

Hello, i'm developping a WP8.1 RT app using the Lumia imaging SDK for 8.1 and it's working like a charm. Recently, I had to put some PubCenter ads on my layout. When navigating to a page that is making calls to Imaging library, I catch an exception : "Requested
Windows Runtime type 'Lumia.Imaging.RandomAccessStramingImageSource' is not registered".
I tried reinstalling the Imaging SDK through nuget. The only way to make my code work again is to delete the reference 'Microsoft Advertising SDK for Windows Phone 8.1 (XAML)'.
I also tried to add this reference on a Lumia Imaging Sample from the official website, same problem but on different methods from the Lumia.Imaging namespace.
Do you guys already experienced this kind of errors ? Is PubCenter known to work with the Lumia Imaging SDK ? If not, is there any other good ad provider on WP8.1 RT (since Admob is no longer supported...)

This looks like is a Visual Studio 2013 update 4 issue, or if you are using Community Edition which includes this update.
The "Requested Windows Runtime type <class> is not registered" exception is caused by that fact that the appxmanifest is file is not correctly generated in VS2013 update 4. There is a bug in Microsoft.Build.AppxPackage.dll, creating an incomplete
list of classes to be registered. This is supposed to be fixed in VS2013 update 5.
Workaround:
Replace the AppxPackage files with VS2013 update 3 version.
- Microsoft.AppxPackage.Targets
- Microsoft.Build.AppxPackage.dll
Replace the two files located at VS2013 installation path (e.g. C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v12.0\AppxPackage\ ) with the update 3 version.
The update 3 files are available here (patch.zip):
https://onedrive.live.com/redir?resid=99B45FF02D12B84D!60194&authkey=!ACQoovyOLV-_7LQ&ithint=file%2czip
Hope this helps!

Image quality issues in PS - word to PDF

Hi,
I am having major image quality issues when trying to make my word document a clean, clear PDF. Images become distorted. Borders for tables and text that are equal px size look like they are different sizes throughout the document.
I have searched the internet, read help, and tried many different things:
Word 2007 - Changed image %, image size, export options, adjusted px for borders, used different styles
Acrobat 9 Pro - Changed import settings, import options, print options, tried press quality, high quality, etc.
Photoshop CS4 - Changed ppx, file format, compression options
What can I do to get a clean, clear PDF file with the images and borders preserved?
Thank you.

In converting a MS Office file to PDF, Photoshop cannot help in any way and will likely cause more harm as it may rasterize vector data. Expect your ideal answer in the Acrobat forum.

More Image/stylesheet issues

Hello again,
Just wondering if anyone could give me some quick style sheet issues, have an img class that looks a little something like this:
img {
border: 5px solid #adadad ! important ;
padding: 5px ! important ;
margin: 4px, 4px, 4px, 4px ! important ;
-moz-border-radius: 15px;
-webkit-border-radius: 15px;
border-radius: 15px;
Which works like magic for getting me a nice curved border in most modern browsers.
Now there are one or two small icon type images that I need to not have a border as they are actually within the text - can anyone think of a way of setting up RH9 so that I can have an image that doesn't follow these styles?
I am sure it will be to do with over riding these styles but not sure how to do this because it is not like I am selecting a style for the image files - they are just getting their styles from the img selector...
Anyone got any suggestions?
much 'preciated.

Hi Willam
I'm a bit confused by what you suggested. You seem to be implying that this won't work and the image paths will break. But I've not found this to be the case. I just tested by creating an image and later creating some nested subfolders and using the variable in topics in each of the subfolders. I then generated WebHelp and viewed and I had no broken images at all. RoboHelp was able to manage the relative pathing to the image without issue.
Have you noticed otherwise?
I'm a believe in erring on the side of caution, but it would seem that (for me anyway) the worry is unfounded.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7, 8 or 9 within the day!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Image reloading Issue - Imagefix

Hi all,
I have requirement like a grid component with images (Thumbnails).I have used the code of from javafx site(Thumnails.fx etc)
view style:Microsoft explorer view with thumbnail
Problem:Image reloading Issue - Imagefix
When i deleting selected image from the grid i am create the object of imagegrid for updated list of images.The problem i am facing after 3 o4 continious sequences the images were not displaying on grid.Every time insert/deleting on image grid functionality i am creating image grid object even though problem still exist.
//Code is like
def image :ImageFix =getImage();
function getImage():ImageFix{
if(url.endsWith(".pdf")){
url=url.replaceAll(".pdf","001.png");
var pdfThumbnai:File=new File(url);
if(not pdfThumbnai.exists()){
ImageFix{
backgroundLoading:true
preserveRatio:true
height:100
width:100
url:"{__DIR__}images/pdf-file-logo-icon.jpg";
//applicationContext.pdfThumbnail;
else{
ImageFix {
height:100
width:100
backgroundLoading:true
preserveRatio:true
url:"file:///{url}"
else ImageFix{
backgroundLoading:true
preserveRatio:true
height:100
width:100
url:url
// the image variable setting imageView for following variable
def imageView : ImageView = ImageView {
smooth: false
cache: true
image: image
cursor:Cursor.HAND
fitHeight:100
fitWidth:100
onMouseClicked: function(evt : MouseEvent) : Void
println("count value in Image Grid is {count}");
var id:Integer;
if(evt.clickCount >= 2)
applicationContextDMS.indexOfImg=count;
println("fileVectorObj {fileVectorObj}");
showOCRScreen(count,folderID,fileVectorObj);
if(evt.clickCount==1)
applicationContextDMS.indexOfImg=count;
selectImage(this);
// Scale the thumbnail up when the mouse enters.
onMouseEntered: function(evt: MouseEvent) : Void
gr.visible=true;
onMouseExited: function( e: MouseEvent ):Void {
gr.visible=false;
Please help out resolve this issuse.
Thanks in advance

The only work around that I found was to rename the image file. Once renaming occurred, the image file when updated was rendered correctly. I have read an earlier bug report that claimed this was fixed. I do not believe it to be so. If anyone has any additional information please present it.

Image Quality issue with script

So I recently wrote a simple script to output an image at a bunch of different resolutions. However, I am running into an image quality issue that I don't run into when I do the same thing manually.
Here is an example image showcasing the image: http://terminalvelocity.ca/temp/notworking.jpg
As you can see along the top of the model's forhead there is destinct color fragmentation. Which seems very strange.
Here is the script, it is pretty simple, it asks for a few simple config options. (the above image was created using default settings). It then figures out the correct ratios and loops through doing each resize, saving the image, then reverting the history so each iteration uses the original image data and not the resized version:
doc = app.activeDocument;
openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800));
minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100));
quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10));
var size;
var primary;
var secondary;
if(doc.width > doc.height){
          primary = doc.width;
          secondary = doc.height;
}else{
          primary = doc.height;
          secondary = doc.width;
var ratio = secondary/primary;
var size = [];
for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
          var p = i
          var s = i * ratio;
          size.push([p,s]);
var w;
var h;
var n;
for(var i in size){
          if(doc.width > doc.height){
                    w = n = size[i][0];
                    h = size[i][1];
          }else{
                    w = size[i][1];
                    n= h = size[i][0];
          if(doc.width >= w && doc.height >= h){
                    doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                    jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                    jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                    jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                    jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                    FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                    jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                    jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                    app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);
                    doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
In comparison, here is an example of an image of the exact same resolution that does not exhibit this issue at all:
The steps taken to save this image were as follows: http://photography.terminalvelocity.ca/content/images/2012/avery_konrad_6/horizontal/1500. jpg
Image > Resize > Bicubic Sharper (1500px);
Save For Web
     Jpeg
     Quality 75
     Optimzed: true
     Progressive: false
     Blur: 0
     Convert to sRGB: true
Anyway, as you can see, The manually exported image does not have any of the quality issues that are present within the scripted image. I am pretty new to photoshop scriping so am assuming it has something to do with me missing some sort of option in the save settings. Any help would be swell.
Also note, this doesn't occur on all images, I usually don't see an issue when using the script, however, something about the tones of this particular photo make it really obvious.
I am using the latest version of Photoshop CS6 (creative cloud) on Max OSX
thanks so much!

I'm on windows find the bicubicsharper does not work well it the image being resized has been highly sharpened all ready. Because of my Photoshop preferences I had to make minor modification to your script. I'm also a bit colorblind so i don't see many color issues so I include a screen capture if what windows does with your image and script.
var orig_ruler_units = app.preferences.rulerUnits;
app.preferences.rulerUnits = Units.PIXELS;          // Set the ruler units to PIXELS
doc = app.activeDocument;
openFilePath = Folder.selectDialog ("Where do you want the images to be saved?");
maxSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the maximum length of the long edge? (Image is never upsized) (pixels)", 2800));
minSize = Number(prompt("What would you like to be the minimum length of the long edge? (pixels)", 100));
gap = Number(prompt("How much smaller should each image be? (pixels)", 100));
quality = Number(prompt("What quality would you like the JPG exported as (0-12)", 10));
var size;
var primary;
var secondary;
if(doc.width > doc.height){
          primary = doc.width;
          secondary = doc.height;
}else{
          primary = doc.height;
          secondary = doc.width;
var ratio = secondary/primary;
var size = [];
for(var i = maxSize;i>minSize;i-=gap){
          var p = i
          var s = i * ratio;
          size.push([p,s]);
var w;
var h;
var n;
for(var i in size){
          if(doc.width > doc.height){
                    w = n = size[i][0];
                    h = size[i][1];
          }else{
                    w = size[i][1];
                    n= h = size[i][0];
          if(doc.width.value >= w && doc.height.value >= h){
                    doc.resizeImage(w,h,null,ResampleMethod.BICUBICSHARPER);
                    jpgFile = new File(openFilePath+"/"+n+".jpeg" )
                    jpgSaveOptions = new JPEGSaveOptions()
                    jpgSaveOptions.embedColorProfile = false
                    jpgSaveOptions.formatOptions =
                    FormatOptions.STANDARDBASELINE
                    jpgSaveOptions.matte = MatteType.NONE
                    jpgSaveOptions.quality = quality
                    app.activeDocument.saveAs(jpgFile, jpgSaveOptions, true,Extension.LOWERCASE);
                    doc.activeHistoryState = doc.historyStates[doc.historyStates.length-2];
app.preferences.rulerUnits = orig_ruler_units;          // Reset units to original settings

Bizarre Lightroom image quality issue

I have a weird image quality issue with Lightroom, when opening RAW files (haven't tried it with any other file format, admittedly).
Here's an example of how the image appears in Lightroom. As an experiment, I exported the image as a TIFF and opened it in Gimp to see if it was just down to a display issue, but the exported TIFF showed the same quality issues as Lightroom. Aside from exporting as a TIFF (and then saving as a Jpeg), this image is SOOC:
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/swisstony10/4912360565/" title="IMG_4134 by swisstony10, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4093/4912360565_5891c0160f.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_4134" /></a>
If I open the same image in Canon's own DPP software, this image quality issue does not occur, so I know that it's not an issue with the memory card, the camera, or my laptop's monitor. The SOOC image from DPP (exported as a Jpeg) looks like this:
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/swisstony10/4912362053/" title="IMG_4134b by swisstony10, on Flickr"><img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4116/4912362053_1ca92078c9.jpg" width="333" height="500" alt="IMG_4134b" /></a>
Has anybody else experienced this, and if so, is there a fix? (there had better be - I'm not going to be overly chuffed if my expensive Adobe software is being outperformed by the free stuff.. )
Russ.

This is proving to be an extremely helpful forum!
Thanks for the advice on embedding my calibrated colour space - I don't very often send files anywhere other than my own home network (where all the monitors are calibrated), and when I do upload any to Flickr, it's never caused a problem in the past (and if I get anything printed by a lab, I use their ICC profile). I'll definitely keep that all in mind though..
Here's the original RAW file of the image I used as the example https://www.yousendit.com/download/aHlUa3ZONmNFd2Z2Wmc9PQ - I hope that helps someone to shed some light on what's going wrong. From what you've said though, it does look as if this is just an extreme example of something that Lightroom isn't very good at doing.
As I said in my original post, it'll be a bit disappointing if that's the case though, because a fair amount of the pictures I take tend to be of bands playing in what are, let's face it, diabolical conditions for photography. (At the festival I was attending at the weekend for example, all of the photographers - even the seasoned pros - were moaning about how awful the lighting was in the Big Top, and how much it sucked to try and get a decent picture there, as opposed to the main stage where everybody wasn't completely backlit by either red or purple lights. I appreciate that Lightroom is a much more powerful tool than Canon's DPP - the noise reduction controls on their own completely rock - but I must admit I'm a bit surprised that it can't handle highlights terribly well...

Wacky image sequence issue - flickers

Hi guys,
I've created a simple 2 image sequence I wanted to play through at the top of my DPS document - but when I preview the article (on both desktop, iphone and ipad) the image sequence fails..
I took a quick screencap to show what Im going.
DPS Image Sequence issue - YouTube
Any advice?

For a two-image effect, I would use a slideshow instead of an image sequence. Not sure what's causing the flicker.

Image Persistence - Image Retention issues - iMac

Hello everyone. When is Apple going to fix all the image retention issues, or as Apple would call it image persistence? I find it to be horrendous that Apple is calling this "normal". There is nothing normal about having an image ghosted or stuck on your display. I hope Apple gets with LG on this and fixes these issues because a fix is long overdue. This has been plaguing iMacs for years now. I have had 2 iMacs in a row that have had this issue straight out of the box. Can anyone tell me why some IPS displays do this and others do not? Is this because Apple is buying junk from LG?
Have a look at these pages:
http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1853972
https://youtu.be/x2dafvZZC7Y

Image persistence on Apple displays:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5455
Apple say this about LCD screen burn in:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2807
which includes suggestions for curing that effect.
Alternatively:
How to fix screen burn and/or stuck pixels on an LCD monitor:
JScreenFix
http://www.jscreenfix.com/basic.php

Spry Image Slideshow issue in IE8 - Another Error

I looked at the other discussions pertaining to Spry Image Slideshow issues. The slideshow works well in Firefox but I'm getting an error in IE 8 .
https://www.devens.army.mil
Webpage error details   from SpryDOMEffects.js, line 389
Spry.Effect.CSSAnimator.stylePropFuncs["default"] = {
    get: function(ele, prop)
        return ele.style[prop];
    set: function(ele, prop, val)
        ele.style[prop] = val;                       (line 389)
Thank you for any help you can provide.

I've noticed that you fixed the problem can you tell me how to fix it?
having same problem here

Lumia Imaging SDK (RedEye)

Trying to use the Lumia Imaging SDK to remove redeye from images. I have been successful in removing redeye from one eye in an image using the code in the examples:
List<Rect> eyes = new List<Rect>();
eyes.Add(new Rect(0,0,1,1));
filterlist.Add(new Lumia.Imaging.Adjustments.RedEyeRemovalFilter(eyes, Lumia.Imaging.Adjustments.RedEyeRemovalMode.Normal));
effect.Filters = filterlist;
await writableBitmapRenderer.RenderAsync();
Can anyone help me in understanding how you get the rect for each eye, I thought I could use a drawn rectangle on the eye then use this to feed the eyes collection but the values range between 0 and 1.
I would appreciate some pointers as to how I should proceed with detecting where the eyes are red or transferring the values from the rectangle drawn around the eyes to the Rect structure.
Mal

Hi,
The coordinates are fractions of the image size, so if your image size is (100, 200) and your eye rect in pixels is at position (50, 50) with size (10, 10), the input to the filter should be (0.5, 0.25, 0.1, 0.05).
Regards,
Jonas
Jonas
I am very close to sorting this, using the code I posted I can now sort redeye but if I make a rectangle around two eyes it only does one of them, if I make a rectangle around the one that's left and try again, it does that one but undo's the other.
Any ideas as to why this would happen?
Mal

[svn] 3185: Partial patch-acceptance for SDK issue 16312 ( patch was SDK-16528).

Revision: 3185
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-09-11 16:03:05 -0700 (Thu, 11 Sep 2008)
Log Message:
Partial patch-acceptance for SDK issue 16312 (patch was SDK-16528).
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-16528
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/branches/3.0.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/RadioButton.as

Image burn issue

Hi all, I am having the image burn issue on my sony vaio duo 11 like. Please check the following link for the images. In my case the burn is visible when the background is grey and I work in the desktop mode for some time. I request your feedback and help in solving this issue. http://bit.ly/11FTG08 [with comments] See the bottom. You can see Windows notification area there   You can clearly see a white navigation bar of google chrome which is opened in the desktop mode
  I have taken all of these pictures with my mobile camera which is 3 years old. Otherwise the imageburn is very clear and distinct to me. Best regards,Naveen.

kamesh419,
This is working as intended. It is the transparent function of Aero. If the user switches back to desktop view, you can see some of the Start Menu background. This is not a burn in issue.
If you want you can turn off Aero and the transparent image will go away both in the Start Menu and also from the Desktop view.
Turn off Aero
1)      Go to the Start Menu
2)      Type Computer
3)      Right click on Computer and select properties
4)      Click on Advanced System settings
5)      Select Settings under Performance
6)      Select “Adjust for best performance”
7)      Click apply and ok.
kamesh419 wrote:
Hi all,
I am having the image burn issue on my sony vaio duo 11 like. Please check the following link for the images. In my case the burn is visible when the background is grey and I work in the desktop mode for some time. I request your feedback and help in solving this issue.
http://bit.ly/11FTG08 [with comments]
See the bottom. You can see Windows notification area there
You can clearly see a white navigation bar of google chrome which is opened in the desktop mode
I have taken all of these pictures with my mobile camera which is 3 years old. Otherwise the imageburn is very clear and distinct to me.
Best regards,
Naveen.

Image insert issue help

I created a simple html page in DW CS3. I inserted an image i plan just to use as an add on this page. The image is 4600 pixel long. Only half of it shows up on my page but the whole thing shows up fine when testing it via DW.. Please help.
Page Code
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>HolidayMiniSessions</title>
<style type="text/css">

</style>
</head>
<body>
<div align="center">
<p><img src="HOLIDAYMINIJENEPHOTOGRAPHY2012.jpg" width="1008" height="4642" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div id="apDiv1">
    <p class="style1"><a href="www.jenephotography.com">WWW.JENEPHOTOGRAPHY.COM</a></p>
    <p class="style1">407-430-8986 EMAIL:<a href="mailto:[email protected]">[email protected]</a></p>
</div>
<p>   </p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
But the DIV is still visible..its confusing me.. WHATS WRONG.. Please help
HERE IS LINK TO PAGE THAT IS CUTTING OFF
http://www.jenephotography.com/addpages/HolidayMiniSessions.html

Yes, I see that the image on your server itself is cut in half. Maybe a timeout issue when you're uploading from Dreamweaver. Try Filezilla. Has a better timeout for ECONN uploads.
To add to John's solution, if a normal upload in Filezilla doesn't work, try doing an ASCII mode upload in Filezilla. This has proven to be a common fix to most image upload issues.
Also, I'd recommend you normalize your filename - use lowercase only and please please please replace spaces with underscores _ or hyphens -

Lumi Imaging SDK Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for