Lync 2013 - Internal Call with net traffic send to AV Public IP

Hello
Firstly brief description of topology:
- Each user is in respective Site, both networks are internal to our Lync topology
- When User A calls (audio only) User B, call is working with no problems, however i can see in network logs that User B at the beginning of the call is sending below traffic to Edge server Public IP.
Client IP
Dest. IP
Dest Port
192.168.34.98
av.domain.com Public IP
TCP
58797
192.168.34.98
av.domain.com Public IP
UDP
53112
192.168.34.98
av.domain.com Public IP
UDP
53112
192.168.34.98
av.domain.com Public IP
UDP
53112
192.168.34.98
av.domain.com Public IP
UDP
53112
192.168.34.98
av.domain.com Public IP
UDP
53112
192.168.34.98
av.domain.com Public IP
TCP
58797
Can you Please tell me if that is correct and if not how to track why its like that ?
- call is working peer-to-peer
- Similar traffic to Public AV IP appears also if User A calls Peer in the same network.
Looking at Candidates sent by User A:
a=candidate:1 1 UDP 2130706431 192.168.136.120 3564 typ host
a=candidate:1 2 UDP 2130705918 192.168.136.120 3565 typ host
a=candidate:2 1 TCP-PASS 174456319 "AV Public IP" 58797 typ relay raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 13338
a=candidate:2 2 TCP-PASS 174455806 "AV Public IP" 58797 typ relay raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 13338
a=candidate:3 1 UDP 184548351 "AV Public IP" 53112 typ relay raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 11668
a=candidate:3 2 UDP 184547838 "AV Public IP" 53776 typ relay raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 11669
a=candidate:4 1 TCP-ACT 174848511 "AV Public IP" 58797 typ relay raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 13338
a=candidate:4 2 TCP-ACT 174847998 "AV Public IP" 58797 typ relay raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 13338
a=candidate:5 1 TCP-ACT 1684797439 192.168.136.120 13338 typ srflx raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 13338
a=candidate:5 2 TCP-ACT 1684796926 192.168.136.120 13338 typ srflx raddr 192.168.136.120 rport 1333
Ports between Users subnets are open as well as to Edge Internal Interface.
Any tips to isolate it a bit more ? I'll provide more info as required.
Thank You

I appreciate your response.
The first one i already know and in fact it creates my doubt:
i can find there:  "Within these traces will often be connection attempts to every single IP address provided in the candidate list, including the relay and reflexive candidates"
 According to this sentence my behavior is correct as AV Public IP is in candidates list. Thing is if it should be there in candidates. Based on article i understand that ICE is done on Edge server. Based on  great presentations of Thomas Binder
here  "clients for ICE part are always connecting to Edge", ( as at the moment of call peer is not aware of remote peer location )
In my case on Edge there is nothing about my call in contrast to FE where i have all ICE work in SIP logs.
Simply:
For internal p2p calls - ICE is done on FrondEnd or Edge ?
For internal p2p calls - should AV Public IP be included in candidates ?
Second link doesn't help to answer that question either :( as focuses on ext - int call scenario )
I believe i am missing some basics here. Thank You & Regards

Similar Messages

  • Lync 2013 PSTN calling not working with Sonus SBC 1000 over TLS and SRTP

    Dear All,
    We have recently installed Lync 2013 Enterprise Edition with a Pool of 3 FE Servers (MEDIATION COLLOCATED).
    We need to implement TLS and SRTP with Sonus SBC 1000. However calls are not routing b/w SBC and Lync.
    We are using wild card certificate with multiple SIP Domains as SAN(s), for internal FE servers as well SBC.
    Also i would like to mentioned here that inbound and outbound calls are routing properly when we tested it over TCP.
    When I move to TLS Only calls from Lync to SBC (outgoing) are working without encryption.
    Here are the OCS Logger traces for incoming calls which are not landing on lync:
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [1]2C5C.0D30::04/30/2014-14:35:18.020.00026518.020.00026518.020.00026518.020.00026518.020.00026518.020.00026518.020.00026518.020.000265d2
    (S4,SipMessage.DataLoggingHelper:sipmessage.cs(774))[3491463749]
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Outgoing SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_AE0419>], 10.10.0.11:5067->10.10.7.50:25678
    SIP/2.0 400 Bad Request
    FROM: "3158222726"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=ac3201ce-4d7
    TO: <sip:[email protected]:5067>;epid=D2091CF753;tag=f373543c
    CSEQ: 2 INVITE
    CALL-ID: [email protected]
    VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.10.7.50:5067;branch=z9hG4bK-UX-ac32-01ce-0b14
    CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
    SERVER: RTCC/5.0.0.0 MediationServer
    ------------EndOfOutgoing SipMessage
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [1]2C5C.0D30::04/30/2014-14:35:18.027.00026518.027.00026518.027.00026518.027.00026518.027.00026518.027.00026518.027.00026518.027.000265d7
    (S4,SipMessage.DataLoggingHelper:sipmessage.cs(774))[2666394843]
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Outgoing SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_370F030>], 10.10.0.11:58059->10.10.0.13:5061
    SERVICE sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone SIP/2.0
    FROM: <sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone>;epid=DCFDB95F4C;tag=17d286a93
    TO: <sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone>
    CSEQ: 3 SERVICE
    CALL-ID: de750f98bdd94e908be5f2f975228ff7
    MAX-FORWARDS: 70
    VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.10.0.11:58059;branch=z9hG4bKd47f1d3c
    CONTACT: <sip:[email protected];gruu;opaque=srvr:MediationServer:CiGdW3iH5FiI3Qvr3PIKGQAA>
    CONTENT-LENGTH: 630
    SUPPORTED: gruu-10
    USER-AGENT: RTCC/5.0.0.0 MediationServer
    CONTENT-TYPE: application/msrtc-reporterror+xml
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="us-ascii"?>
    <reportError xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2006/09/sip/error-reporting">
    <error callId="[email protected]" fromUri="sip:3158222726;[email protected];user=phone" toUri="sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone" fromTag="ac3201ce-4d7"
    toTag="" requestType="INVITE" contentType="application/sdp;call-type=audio" responseCode="400"><diagHeader>10013;reason="Gateway peer in inbound call is not found in topology document or does not depend
    on this Mediation Server"</diagHeader><progressReports /></error></reportError>------------EndOfOutgoing SipMessage
    Call
    Send SMS
    Add to Skype
    You'll need Skype CreditFree via Skype

    @Paul, Thanks for you response.
    All ports / IP Add / DNS are defined properly. Telenet on listening port is working.
    We are using Public Certificate for 3 Domains (wild card) and same is loaded and verified in SBC
    I've not reviewed the OCS logs properly posted above.
    What i've found or seems to me is that in a TLS Calls:
    After receiving SIP Invite from SBC, mediation server started TLS Negotiation Process b/w Lync 2013 Server Pool and it fails.
    SIP Domains:
    contoso.com (default)
    fabrikam.com
    Lync FE Pool (lync.contoso.com
    Here are the some more logs.
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [0]2DF8.2930::05/01/2014-11:50:31.612.00025e49 (S4,SipMessage.DataLoggingHelper:sipmessage.cs(774))[2716989131]
    <<<<<<<<<<<<Incoming SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_103DFE0>], 10.10.0.11:5067<-10.10.7.50:24591
    INVITE sip:[email protected]:5067 SIP/2.0
    FROM: "3158222726" <sip:[email protected]>;tag=ac3201ce-ae
    TO: <sip:[email protected]:5067>
    CSEQ: 2 INVITE
    CALL-ID: [email protected]
    MAX-FORWARDS: 70
    VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.10.7.50:5067;branch=z9hG4bK-UX-ac32-01ce-010c
    CONTACT: <sip:[email protected]:5067;transport=TLS>
    CONTENT-LENGTH: 406
    SUPPORTED: replaces,update,100rel
    USER-AGENT: SONUS SBC1000 3.1.2v293 Sonus SBC
    CONTENT-TYPE: application/sdp
    ALLOW: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, BYE, NOTIFY, OPTIONS, REFER, REGISTER, UPDATE, PRACK
    P-ASSERTED-IDENTITY: "3158222726" <sip:[email protected]>
    v=0
    o=SBC 9 1001 IN IP4 10.10.7.50
    s=VoipCall
    c=IN IP4 10.10.7.50
    t=0 0
    m=audio 16418 RTP/AVP 8 0 101 13
    c=IN IP4 10.10.7.50
    a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000/1
    a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000/1
    a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
    a=fmtp:101 0-15
    a=rtpmap:13 CN/8000
    a=ptime:20
    a=tcap:1 RTP/SAVP
    a=pcfg:1 t=1
    a=crypto:1 AES_CM_128_HMAC_SHA1_80 inline:pqL6Tke8pVmXPuplJ1G3+Sr9jM97H8R7iBagWzzh|2^31|1:1
    a=sendrecv
    ------------EndOfIncoming SipMessage
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [1]2DF8.0E04::05/01/2014-11:50:31.665.00025e8e (S4,SipMessage.DataLoggingHelper:sipmessage.cs(774))[2716989131]
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Outgoing SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_103DFE0>], 10.10.0.11:5067->10.10.7.50:24591
    SIP/2.0 100 Trying
    FROM: "3158222726"<sip:[email protected]>;tag=ac3201ce-ae
    TO: <sip:[email protected]:5067>
    CSEQ: 2 INVITE
    CALL-ID: [email protected]
    VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.10.7.50:5067;branch=z9hG4bK-UX-ac32-01ce-010c
    CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
    ------------EndOfOutgoing SipMessage
    TL_INFO(TF_CONNECTION) [1]184C.0EFC::05/01/2014-11:50:32.652.00025f32 (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::WriteConnectionEvent:SIPAdminLog.cpp(454))[946832530] $$begin_record
    Severity: information
    Text: TLS negotiation started
    Local-IP: 10.10.0.11:5061
    Peer-IP: 10.10.0.11:52529
    Connection-ID: 0x10BE00
    Transport: TLS
    $$end_record
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [1]184C.0EFC::05/01/2014-11:50:32.669.00026236 (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::ProtocolRecord::Flush:ProtocolRecord.cpp(265))[1853494582] $$begin_record
    Trace-Correlation-Id: 1853494582
    Instance-Id: 425D
    Direction: incoming
    Peer: 10.10.0.11:52529
    Message-Type: request
    Start-Line: NEGOTIATE sip:127.0.0.1:5061 SIP/2.0
    FROM: <sip:contoso.com>;ms-fe=LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com
    TO: <sip:contoso.com>
    CALL-ID: aa53739ef9b34b93ba9c97d3ee56cb99
    CSEQ: 1 NEGOTIATE
    VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.10.0.11:52529
    MAX-FORWARDS: 0
    CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
    SUPPORTED: NewNegotiate
    SUPPORTED: ECC
    REQUIRE: ms-feature-info
    SERVER: RTC/5.0
    $$end_record
    TL_INFO(TF_CONNECTION) [1]184C.0EFC::05/01/2014-11:50:32.669.0002636e (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::WriteConnectionEvent:SIPAdminLog.cpp(383))[946832530] $$begin_record
    Severity: information
    Text: Connection established
    Peer-IP: 10.10.0.11:52529
    Peer: lync.contoso.com:52529;ms-fe=LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com
    Peer-Cert: contoso.com(LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com)
    Transport: M-TLS
    Data: alertable="yes"
    $$end_record
    TL_WARN(TF_CONNECTION) [1]184C.0EFC::05/01/2014-11:50:32.669.00026387 (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::WriteConnectionEvent:SIPAdminLog.cpp(386))[946832530] $$begin_record
    Severity: warning
    Text: The pool FQDN provided by the peer in its NEGOTIATE feature information does not match the pool configured in CMS for the server FQDN that it provided
    Peer-IP: 10.10.0.11:52529
    Peer: lync.contoso.com:52529;ms-fe=LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com
    Peer-Cert: contoso.com(LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com)
    Transport: M-TLS
    Data: fqdn="LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com";pool="contoso.com";expected-fqdn="lync.contoso.com";info="Possible server configuration issue"
    $$end_record
    TL_INFO(TF_DIAG) [1]184C.0EFC::05/01/2014-11:50:32.670.000265be (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::WriteDiagnosticEvent:SIPAdminLog.cpp(802))[1853494582] $$begin_record
    Severity: information
    Text: Routed a locally generated response
    SIP-Start-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
    SIP-Call-ID: aa53739ef9b34b93ba9c97d3ee56cb99
    SIP-CSeq: 1 NEGOTIATE
    Peer: lync.contoso.com:52529;ms-fe=LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com
    $$end_record
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [1]184C.0EFC::05/01/2014-11:50:32.670.00026615 (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::ProtocolRecord::Flush:ProtocolRecord.cpp(265))[1853494582] $$begin_record
    Trace-Correlation-Id: 1853494582
    Instance-Id: 425E
    Direction: outgoing;source="local"
    Peer: lync.contoso.com:52529;ms-fe=LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com
    Message-Type: response
    Start-Line: SIP/2.0 200 OK
    FROM: <sip:contoso.com>;ms-fe=LYNCFE1.fabrikam.com
    To: <sip:contoso.com>;tag=C3A751556F332F7265E9BA2517C878D4
    CALL-ID: aa53739ef9b34b93ba9c97d3ee56cb99
    CSEQ: 1 NEGOTIATE
    Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.10.0.11:52529;ms-received-port=52529;ms-received-cid=10BE00
    Content-Length: 0
    Require: ms-feature-info
    Supported: NewNegotiate,OCSNative,ECC,IPv6,TlsRecordSplit
    Server: RTC/5.0
    $$end_record
    TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [1]2DF8.1078::05/01/2014-11:50:32.671.000266da (S4,SipMessage.DataLoggingHelper:sipmessage.cs(774))[720988281]
    >>>>>>>>>>>>Outgoing SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_F8A09B>], 10.10.0.11:52529->10.10.0.11:5061
    SERVICE sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone SIP/2.0
    FROM: <sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone>;epid=16FEE4A02E;tag=22fd877f3a
    TO: <sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone>
    CSEQ: 3 SERVICE
    CALL-ID: ac0f7bc4cdc94c1dbd0bb51c7c02c890
    MAX-FORWARDS: 70
    VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.10.0.11:52529;branch=z9hG4bK67a4c9d1
    CONTACT: <sip:[email protected];gruu;opaque=srvr:MediationServer:CiGdW3iH5FiI3Qvr3PIKGQAA>
    CONTENT-LENGTH: 628
    SUPPORTED: gruu-10
    USER-AGENT: RTCC/5.0.0.0 MediationServer
    CONTENT-TYPE: application/msrtc-reporterror+xml
    - <reportError xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2006/09/sip/error-reporting">
    - <error callId="[email protected]"
    fromUri="sip:3158222726;[email protected];user=phone"
    toUri="sip:2138797082;[email protected];user=phone"
    fromTag="ac3201ce-ae"
    toTag=""
    requestType="INVITE"
    contentType="application/sdp;call-type=audio"
    responseCode="400">
    <diagHeader>10013;reason="Gateway peer in inbound call is not found in topology document or does not depend on this Mediation Server"</diagHeader>
    <progressReports/>
    - </error>
    ------------EndOfOutgoing SipMessage

  • Lync 2013 FE pool with two server limitions

    Hi,
    I have some query about Lync 2013 FE pool with two FE servers.
    1. if I deploy two servers in the one FE pool so what happen if one fe server down ?
    2. will windows fabric work?
    Thanks.

    I don't completely agree with this. I have built a few environments with only 2 servers in the Front End pool (despite recommending that three be deployed) 
    1. Anyway in the event that one FE fails, users are temporarily disconnected and then the client will re-sign them in to the second server.
    2. Two servers is supported, but not recommended. See this link (it also contains how to handle two servers - scroll to bottom) http://technet.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/gg412996.aspx.
    The biggest issue with only having two servers is losing quorum. If both servers are shutdown at the same time, you can run into issues starting them back up. (it is recoverable by resetting the fabric/quorum, but it's a pain)
    If this helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer" | Blog
    www.lynced.com.au | Twitter
    @imlynced

  • Call Pickup - Users experience One Way Audio when using Call Pickup Orbit to pickup internal calls with internal Lync 2010 Callers

    Hi
    Noticed an issue where when using Call Park Function with users you receive one way audio when answering the call
    The scenario is
    1) If a user is internal and is homed on Lync 2010 Pool and calls an internal user who is homed on a Lync 2013 Pool and another internal user homed on a Lync 2013 Pool picks up the call with Call Pick Up orbit, Lync 2010 users only hears one way audio and
    same for user who has picked up call
    2) If the scenario is an External PSTN call or another Lync 2013 user these calls are fine
    In Lync Tracing logs a SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist error is returned
    Is this a known bug or expected behavior - Call Pickup is basically useless until all users are migrated to Lync 2013 as there is no way of a user knowing whether call is internal or external and if the user is on Lync 2010 or 2013, obviously in my
    large organization 2000 users no an overnight thing
    Coupled with the fact no Team Call Group\ Simultaneous Ring can be in place for Call Pickup to work im thinking Call Pick Up is not going to happen for awhile
    Is there any fixes\ developments that may help this issue or is there a setting I am missing

    Hi,
    Please install latest update for Lync Server 2010 and 2013.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/lync/dn146015.aspx
    If the issue persists, please enable logging tool on Front end and Mediation server to get trace for troubleshooting.
    http://blog.schertz.name/2011/06/using-the-lync-logging-tool/
    Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Microsoft cannot make any representations regarding the quality, safety, or suitability of any software or information found there. Please make
    sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
    Kent Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Alert rule - Lync 2013 MP - Call reliability alert

    We have SCOM 2012 and use Lync 2013 MP to monitor Lync environment. There is an alert in SCOM created by rule Call reliability alert rule from Lync MP. It is generated based on event ID 1122 from Operations Manager event log. In details there is a following
    info:
    The failure happens for the following modalities:
    Media Type = Audio
    Distinct Users Impacted = 2
    Total Calls = 156
    Failed Calls = 2
    Failure Percentage = 1.2820512820500
    This alert is generating quite often but everything is working ok, no problems with Lync. I am wondering how I can tune this rule to not generate alerts so often, only when there is a real problem. E.g. is it possible to generate alert based on the failure
    percentage value (this is a body of event id 1122)?
    I checked override options for this alert rule but not sure what I can do

    Hi
    bbelko
    There is one more collection rules is involved in this process, you can override the values to reduce calll reliability alerts.
    If the value changed then the alerts will reduce based on criteria.
    above mentioned values are default ,  you can set as per your organization.
    check and update the result  here that will useful to others to find.
    Hope you got some info.
    Thanks & Regards, Kesa_Kara

  • Lync 2013 and problem with copy/paste from SQL Mgmt Studio.

    Hi Everyone,
    Recently one of ours programmers noticed a very interesting issue which is a real pain in the a## for him and his colleagues. It was all fine with Lync client 2010, problem started when moved some people to 2013 client.
    When someone sends him a message with SQL Code, and he is pasting it into SQL mgmt std. he gets dashes "-" instead of spaces " ".
    I thought this is a local PC issue, but:
    1. On 2010 it worked, stopped all of a sudden when they changed lync client to 2013
    2. They are pasting code on the SERVER not local SQL mgmt std. on their client machines
    3. Even if I send him a code from Lync 2010 and he is pasting that from his 2013 client - he gets "-" dashes, so I guess it is not important from where I send the message, but from where he is copying it.
    As for now, I have noticed that problem with guys from England and region of APAC - they have lync 2013 client already.
    Really appreciate any help as I donot have any point where to start troubleshooting...
    Cheers guys,

    Hi,
    I test the issue with my colleague and didn't find the same issue.
    Here is the screenshot:
    So please check if Lync Server 2013 and all the issued Lync 2013 client update to the latest version firstly, it not update to the latest version, update it and then test again.
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Lync 2013 Emergency Calling - Including Another User (Conference)

    Hi all
    I am trying to establish if when a user calls an emergency number, a conference call can be initiated from the client side to a security desk / user and include them into the call.
    I know we can initiate IM's and alerts but is it at all possible to get a user into the call?
    Thanks
    Ben

    Hi NeoburnerS,
    When a user makes an emergency call, Lync Server routes the call audio, along with the location and callback information, through a Mediation Server to an E9-1-1 service provider. The E9-1-1 service provider uses the civic address of the caller to route
    the call to the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) that serves the caller's location, and sends along an Emergency Service Query Key (ESQK) that the PSAP uses to look up the caller's ERL.
    In addition, you could post the question on MSDN Lync SDK forum and more developing experts will help to verify if this can be achieved using Lync SDK. Thank you for your understanding.
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/communicatorsdk/threads
    Best regards,
    Eric

  • Lync 2013 internal video stuck at connecting

    Hi,
    I have built a simple Lync 2013 deployment with two FE enterprise servers a F5 load balancer and a single edge server. The problem I have is that video or desktop sharing won't work internally. The status within the client is 'Connecting...' if I perform
    a network monitoring capture, when I start my video and get the 'connecting..' notice, I see packets from my PC to the Lync edge server.
    This is confusing as I expected video to be peer-to-peer.
    Is there something wrong with my topology to explain this behaviour?

    Hi, Thanks for replying! The workload poster is very useful. Spent all of yesterday looking at snooper, network monitor, firewall logs, but couldn't resolve issue. Overnight had the thought of a fresh install of the Lync client on test PC's, this worked!
    yah!
    I had customised the installation of the lync client, I removed the Office 2013 tools, including the lync recording manager, office 2013 language prefrences and office 2013 upload center (we use office 2010). As I didn't think these were necessary for basic
    lync, seems I was wrong.
    Will work on the cutomised install again to include these options, and wil test lync video / desktop sharing.

  • Is Lync 2013 perfectly compatible with Office 2010?

    Microsoft Office 2010 and Lync 2013 are two diferrent instances, but they use some common elements.
    In our company we have over a hundred MS Office 2010 licences and we dont need/afford to change them all to 2013. Now we want to install Lync 2013 and I wonder if there could be compatibility issues or, if Lync 2013 can modifiy the common files they use,
    so that certain functions in Office 2010 will not be available or not work properly.
    Is there a risk of this happening or they can work together "in complete harmony"? This is very important to me and I cannot afford to make a mistake. I would appreciate any help. Thank you.

    Hi Cristi,
    Checkout these Lyncs on compatibility and interoperability:
    Lync 2013 Compatibility http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg412817.aspx
    Client Interoperability http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204672.aspx
    As far as having Lync 2013 & Office 2010 on the same PC, largely it SHOULD be ok and I've not had many issues. The exception to this was on a recent Citrix deployment, where for some reason running Lync 2013 was causing the Office 2010 instance to rerun
    everytime it was started. All desktops were ok though.
    My suggestion is to make sure you thoroughly test with every scenario that you can think of before rolling out to the masses.
    If this helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer" | Blog
    www.lynced.com.au | Twitter
    @imlynced

  • Lync 2013 Cumulative updates with coexistence 2010

    Hello 
    I am pretty new lync admin, i have successfully done a coexistence with 2010 and 2013
    I just need clarification on the steps for a 2013 standard edition cu updates. 
    From the site http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2809243  I am seeing that I need to 
    1) run LyncServerUpdateInstaller.exe
    2)run Install-CsDatabase -ConfiguredDatabases -SqlServerFqdn SE.FQDN -Verbose
    3) Do not run Install-CsDatabase -CentralManagementDatabase until after full 2013 migration 
    4) Enable the Mobility service, run the following cmdlet:
    Enable-CsTopology
    5) Run %ProgramFiles%\Microsoft Lync Server 2013\Deployment\Bootstrapper.exe
    Just need those steps confirmed and..
    1) Just to confirm that I dont need to worry about output of Get-CsPoolUpgradeReadinessState command
    2) We dont have Mobility service, do I still need to run Enable-CsTopolgy for Standard edition?
    Thanks !

    Thank Iain 
    Just to confirm it is lync 2013 CU updates I am trying to perform on standard pool 
    When i run the CsPoolUpgradeReadinessState 
    I get State:insufficientActiveFrontEnds and IsReadForUpgrade True
    According to the update notes, they only speak of running cspoolupgradereadiness on Enterprise edition pool. 
    So i just wanted to know if the output of cspoolupgradereadinessState can be ignored or concerned about for the updates. 

  • Lync 2013 missed calls in outlook

    I have lync 2013 client and server and outlook 2010 , when I received a missed call it show the caller number ( Avaya extension ) not the caller name ( AD display name ) ,
    when I was on lync client 2010 the caller number is translated automatically to caller name .

    I think this is the information that comes via unified contact store from your Outlook contacts. Any
    contact stored in your outlook should display names if the calling number is matched. That is how it works on Lync 2013 client. So, check if that Avaya extension is matched to any of your Outlook contacts, if not enter it in the appropriate contact and make
    a test call, it should not show the name of that contact. 

  • Lync 2013 and SSL with edge

    Dear All,
    It is always come to be a confusing, about certificate when it comes to lync 2013 and edge. suppose i have domain abc.com and i have to plan to add additional sip domain like xyz.com, abc.com, dfg.com etc. and my default domain would be abc.com so my naming
    option would be like this meet.abc.com/sipdomain/meet. I am little confuse how this is teckle in frontend and edge role. Do i have to get new request in edge or have to just import certificate generated in frontend and import into edge. 

    Thanks Eric and Thamara,
    So for internal CA, which means i have to install active directory certiificate and no need to buy certificate from public authority. and  which include following entries on first front end server admin.defaultsipdomain.com, dialin.defaultsipdomain,
     lyncdiscoverinternal.defaultsipdomain,  lyncdiscover.defaultsipdomain.com
    Or i should i get it from public authority and add all edge and front end requirement and reverse proxy in ucc certificate  and use same to import into front end and edge and reverse proxy. 

  • International Calling with an LG Cosmos

    Is it possible to make international calls from the UK with an LG Cosmos ?

    Good Afternoon INF,
    I appreciate your interest in making calls from the the UK with the LG Cosmos. Please be advised this handset is not capable for service while in the UK, due to conflicting network technologies. We do however; have a great Global Rental Program. I have included additional information below for your reference.
    http://goo.gl/Rdvno
    Sincerely,
    JonathanK_VZW
    VZW Support
    Follow Us on Twitter@VZWSupport

  • International calls with FaceTime

    Hello, I am curious of this FaceTime feature. Can it make ANY international calls to whoever all for free?

    iRageU95 wrote:
    Hello, I am curious of this FaceTime feature. Can it make ANY international calls to whoever all for free?
    More info: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4319
    Mac Pro Quad Core (Early 2009) 2.93Ghz Mac OS X (10.6.5); MacBook Pro (13 inch, Mid 2009) 2.26GHz (10.6.5)
    LED Cinema Display; G4 PowerBook 1.67GHz (10.4.11); iBookSE 366MHz (10.3.9); External iSight; iPod4touch4.2.1

  • Lync 2013 sql mirroring with different doamin sql server.

    Hi,
    can I create lync BE sql mirroring with different domain sql server with one AD forest?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    You can note the sentence “Using Topology Builder or cmdlets to set up and remove SQL mirroring is supported only when the primary, mirror, and witness (if desired) servers all belong to the same domain. If you want to set up SQL mirroring among servers
    in different domains, see your SQL Server documentation.” In the link below:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204992.aspx
    So I think in Lync server if you use Topology Builder or cmdlets to set up and remove SQL mirroring only if when the primary, mirror, and witness (if desired) servers all belong to the same domain. If you want to set up SQL mirroring among servers in different
    domains you may do some steps on SQL server and you can also post a case on SQL forum, thank you for your understanding.
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/home?category=sqlserver
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • CFM2 - Table does not exist in database.

    Hi Gurus, I am new to EWM & facing one error while transferring Inbound Delivery to SCM EWM from ECC.(T Code - CFM2) Please also note that, 1.I could transfer the master data through CFM1& CFM2 from ECC to EWM                                     2.In

  • Do I have a problem.  My unit works, but not by the directions

    I may be an idiot. I opened my new nano (I got it from my brother) and saw on the side PC + Mac. Ok, I connected it and booted up into LINUX, that is installed on my PC. It is installed on my personal computer, or am I not too wise? So then I went th

  • Standard MSI tvcard for 180 problems!

    Help! I don't seem to get any channel on my tv cards only thing i get is blue screens. I installed everything and try to autoscan in media portal deluxe and i only get blue screens. I am in holland and tryed every pal setting but it should be PAL_B (

  • Error in uploading customer orders..?

    Hello gurus, those who have worked or working on singleview,pls help we have a system in which all customer orders are uploaded in "Order_..... .xml" format. these orders xml's with a max line limit of 40 get uploaded on my current configuration(ubbc

  • Automatic tray selection for printing

    When the print out is issued from the SMARTFORM, it should automatically determine the tray for the paper (based on a pre-defined logic): The trays can be: Tray 1 Tray 2 Manual Feed Is this possible in SAP? (version 4.6c) Is there a dependency on the