M400 Screen Resolution for Windows 7

Hi all,
I have an m400 tablet that I just got off lease and fixed up.  It is great running Windows 7 except that I think that I am supposed to be able to set the screen resolution to something higher than 1024 x 768.  Right now, that is the highest setting.  The only other choice is 800 x 600.  I have installed the latest graphics drivers for windows 7 from the toshiba support website.  
Is this the limit for this machine?  It seems like it should go higher considering the M200 machine goes to the higher resolution with windows 7.
I am running Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit.  
Thanks!
Red
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks for the reply Jerry!
It is an S5032.  
I looked it up and you are right about the screen resolution.  It makes me feel better to know it is correct.  I had been reading about the higher resolution and I didn't realize there were diffferent specs for different versions of the notebook. 
The m200s that I bought both allow for the higher resolution (by default on XP and with a hacked driver in windows 7).  It is understandable as to why they changed to the lower native resolution though.  The higher resolution makes reading text difficult on a 12.1 inch screen.
It is hard to belive that this notebook retailed for $1700 in 2007 and I bought this one for $50 on ebay + $25 for a battery and power cord.  I already had a hard drive and copy of windows for it (Windows 8 Consumer Preview also worked very well but I removed it because I thought the graphics driver was not working haha).  
Thanks again.

Similar Messages

  • Optimal screen resolution for Windows XP

    I'm using Windows XP at times, and it was installed for me when I purchased the computer via MacMall. The screen resolution is sat at screen: 1440 x 900 Color 32 BPP. Is this the desirable setting? I have not change it, as I'm wary to experiment too much with Windows XP on the Mac.

    If you're using an LCD, the optimal resolution is what ever the native (usually advertised) resolution is of the LCD. Anything lower and things may be blurry. It cannot go higher.

  • 13" Cannot set screen resolution in Windows 7 to 1440 by 900

    Just finished installing BootCamp with Windows 7 Pro. For some reason the screen resolution in Windows display driver only goes up to 1200 not 1440 x 900. On MacOS it is obviously working fine. Any ideas?

    On my MacBook Air 11 with Windows 7 64 bit I experience an even worse situation: when ever trying to install a NVidia driver (also when following the mentioned instructions) the setup executable reports - after a check of system compatibility - that no compatible graphic hardware (=320m) could be found. Luckily at least MacOS X is aware of a NVidia 320m installed.
    Any Idea? Thanks

  • Screen Resolution for CS4 apps?

    I'm finding my 22" screen distorts my files. What are some tips for the best screen resolution for the following:
    PhotoShop
    Illustrator
    InDesign
    Dreamweaver
    This is Windows XP Pro.
    Thanks for your help.

    LCD panels must be used at their native resolution. Whatever it is for you monitor is what you must set it to.
    Bob

  • How we will maintain screen resolution for tmaintaining able control in BDC

    how we will maintain screen resolution for tmaintaining able control in BDC. can you give the code or how we have to set it

    Hi,
    You need to use the CTU_PARAM options with the call transaction method.This is used if you would like to do a commit work once call trnasaction is done. This has also got very important property, for example if your Screen resolution is different from others then the screen (Application) will be different that is you'll be having say 5 lines in your screen where as your friend will be having 8 or 10 so your program might fail in this case. If you set variable DEFSIZE as 'X' it will always use the default screen size and hence avoids error.
    Use CALL TRANSACTION 'XXX' OPTIONS FROM w_ctu_params.( type CTU_PARAMS)
    This structure contains the follwing.
    DISMODE : Display mode (like the MODE addition)
    UPDMODE: Update mode (like the UPDATE addition)
    CATTMODE: CATT mode (controls a CATT)
    CATT mode can have the following values:
    ' ' No CATT active
    'N' CATT without single-screen control
    'A' CATT with single-screen control
    DEFSIZE : Use default window size (Here we are handling those transaction by giving default window size)
    RACOMMIT: Do not end transaction at COMMIT WORK
    NOBINPT : No batch input mode (that is, SY-BINPT = SPACE)
    NOBIEND : No batch input mode after the end of BDC data.
    The components DEFSIZE , RACOMMIT, NOBINPT, and NOBIEND always take the following values:
    'X' Yes
    This might help u in better understanding...
    Re: regarding bdc
    Re: ctu_params
    Regards
    Sudheer

  • Blue Screen Error for Windows 7 Home Basic 64 Bit

    I have a Sony Vaio E Series with WINDOWS 7 64bit home basic preinstalled. It worked perfectly fine for 2 yrs until last month, I needed to replace the hard drive due to bad sectors. Now, after a month of replacing my hard drive fresh from
    Sony Center, I decided to do a dual boot (install another OS - Windows 8.1 pro) on a separate partition. Everything is averagely fine. But 2 nights ago, I encounter a blue screen error for WIN 7 (my pre installed one). It happened the second time, so I started
    it in safe mode and did a system restore. I don't know if it will prevent future occurence of blue screen, but to make sure, I reinstall my factory default drivers using Vaio CARE... Pls help.
    PS: I have not encountered BLUE SCREEN error in Windows 8.1 yet. Is it OS specific? Here's the error the second time, it happened on my Windows 7:
    Blue screen error for Windows 7 home basic
    Problem signature:
      Problem Event Name:    BlueScreen
      OS Version:    6.1.7601.2.1.0.768.2
      Locale ID:    13321
    Additional information about the problem:
      BCCode:    1000007e
      BCP1:    FFFFFFFFC0000005
      BCP2:    FFFFF80002EE6B80
      BCP3:    FFFFF880035F4DC8
      BCP4:    FFFFF880035F4620
      OS Version:    6_1_7601
      Service Pack:    1_0
      Product:    768_1
    Files that help describe the problem:
      C:\Windows\Minidump\083014-31964-01.dmp
      C:\Users\GARIBALDI\AppData\Local\Temp\WER-76456-0.sysdata.xml
    Read our privacy statement online:
      http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
    If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
      C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt

    Hi Garibaldi11,
    If you are not equipped to debug this problem, you should use some basic troubleshooting techniques.
    •Make sure you have enough disk space.
    •If a driver is identified in the bug check message, disable the driver or check with the manufacturer for driver updates.
    •Try changing video adapters.
    •Check with your hardware vendor for any BIOS updates.
    •Disable BIOS memory options such as caching or shadowing.
    Bug Check 0x7E: SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff559239(v=vs.85).aspx
    Bug check 0x1000007E has the same meaning and parameters as bug check 0x7E
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • What is the optimum screen resolution for Macbook Pro 15 inch?

    Hi, can anyone please provide advice on the optimum screen resolution for a 15 inch MacBook Pro?

    Natively you'll get a resolution of 1440 x 900 or you can pay for an upgrade  to 1680 x 1050(current models).

  • 24"iMAC optimal screen resolution for photo processing

    I have a 24" iMAC (matte) and do mostly photo editing. What is the optimal screen resolution for photo processing work?
    thanks
    a/d/

    All Screens are 72 dpi (dots per inch- in reference to pixels) no matter what screen resolution you use. The only difference the screen resolution will make is the size of the photo when you are viewing. Higher resolution means the picture will take up less space in you work area, but you will most likely have to zoom in to edit finer areas. Lower resolution will cause the picture you are editing to take up more of your work space and to see multiple photos side by side you will have to zoom out of fron the photos. So, really the choice is up to you.
    When creating the original document, this is where you need to monitor the dpi. The higher the dpi, the clearer your photo will look in print. A high dpi also means more disk space is being taken up by the photo. Generally a good dpi for print is 300 dpi. Anything that is only purposed for a screen based project (i.e. internet logos) should be saved at 72 dpi. Why use disk space and cause your pages to take longer load if no one will be able to tell the difference on screen between 72 and 300 dpi?
    Hope this helps!

  • Resizing  Screen Resolution for Specific Apps?

    Hello team,
    Is it possible to resize screen resolution for specific applications? Most of my apps look fine at 1024x768, but there are a couple of older OS 9 apps that I need to run (talking school computers here) which are a bit on the small side when viewed at that resolution. Can I somehow set things so that when those applications are launched, the resolution changes to 800x600, and then reverts to 1024x768 when they're quit again? Any and all details about this will be most appreciated, and I thank you in advance for your help!
    Electronically yours,
    Erik D. Dahlin
    School-based Technology Specialist

    LCD panels must be used at their native resolution. Whatever it is for you monitor is what you must set it to.
    Bob

  • 11gr1 - Handling different screen resolutions for an enterprise app.

    Hi,
    We are developing an enterprise application that will be deployed at different clients with different hardware.
    We are confused about how to handle different screen resolutions and wonder how others are handling this.
    We have some fixed size areas in our screens and liquid areas for content that may expand. The problem is say that you have a table with 6 columns. This table will be rendered nicely at 1280X800 but not at 1650X1050 or 800X600.
    At higher resolutions we will either end up having some blank space or expand one of the columns of the table , but can't expand every column proportionally and this will look ugly.
    For lower resolutions same problem in a different way will come into picture, we will not able to resize the columns and end up with scroll bars etc ...
    What is the best practice with handling different screen resolutions for components like table,panel splitter etc ?
    Thanks

    Hi Muhammed,
    I don't think that any better solution exists, you already use liquid layouts and define widths & heights with percentages etc. In my opinion using blank column at the end of table columns makes table's looking better. Additionally creating custom skin for table and defining column heights & widths with % or em may help you to stretch columns?

  • Screen resolution for iPhoto

    Screen resolution for iPhoto-I keep getting the message when I open iPhoto,"screen resolution not optimal for iPhoto". How do I find what is the optimal resolution?

    See this previous discussion
    Re: When I open iPhoto I get on the screen The currant screen resolution is not optimal for iPhoto

  • Optimum Screen Resolution for Slides

    I need to create a few slides which will be displayed full-screen. Since
    there's no way to know the resolution of the monitors of the many
    participants, how do I choose the resolution of my slides? Are they
    downsampled in any way by the Adobe server when I upload them? My screen
    resolution is 1920 x 1200 but I suspect a slide built to that resolution
    would create problems for viewers on smaller monitors. Am I right? Is
    there an optimum screen resolution for slides viewed during a Connect Pro
    session?

    Natively you'll get a resolution of 1440 x 900 or you can pay for an upgrade  to 1680 x 1050(current models).

  • Screen resolution for Fusion Applications?

    We are in process to set screen resolution standard for our ADF applications. We are much interested to know about supported screen resolution in fusion applications. Can any body let us know what is minimum required resolution for fusion applications? And what is recommended resolution?

    It is 1280*1024 as per
    Standard Screen Resolution for Fusion Apps

  • Screen resolution in Windows XP

    Hi all,
    I have a iMac 24", with a screen resolution of 1920x1200. I installed Windows XP with Bootcamp. The problem I have now is in Windows, the highest possible choice for screen resolution is 1600x1200 which doesn't look good at all.
    How do I change that into 1920x1200?
    I am a complete newbie when it comes to windows so help is appreciated. (I only installed it to run SolidWorks during work).
    Thanks,
    Veronica

    Hi Veronica,
    just to rule ou the obvious:
    Have you installed the BootCamp Windows Drivers from the OSX DVD yet ?
    If not, while in Windows pop in the OSX DVD and the Driver Installation should start automatically.
    Stefan

  • Proper screen resolution for optimum work with SD

    A couple of questions.
    I've just set up a 27" IMAC with FC. What's surprised me is the poor quality of the SD image I'm getting in the Viewer and Canvas. Two years ago I edited another SD project on a system using two 24" Apple monitors, and at that time we were all amazed by the quality of the image. Hardly looked like SD at all. We were even impressed when we looked at the work on the full screen. Yet that's not what I'm getting now.
    I'm just wondering if there as been a change in the most recent version of FC. (Mine is FCP 7;I don't know what version I was using two years ago on that other project.) I looked in the manual and under "Viewer/Pop-Up Menu" I read: "+If the Viewer is scaled to anything other than 100 percent and you're displaying a DV clip, only one field is shown during playback or while scrubbing through the clip+." Has this always been the case with DV, which my SD footage is? Could my problem only be a problem with this latest version of FC?
    As it is, set optimally on the 27" with a second monitor for the Browser, my Viewer and Canvas are producing a 199% size image. So given that, plus the fact that I'm only seeing one field, maybe I shouldn't be surprised at the weak image I'm getting.
    Second question.
    After reading about this loss of one field when the DV image is other than 100% I thought I'd set the Viewer pop-up menu to 100% rather than "Fit Window". Problem here, of course is that my image is now very small - a diagonal of only 7 inches. To try and deal with this I've played around with the IMAC screen resolution and when I change it from 2560x1440 to 1920X1080 I can get a 100% two field image with a 9 1/2 inch diagonal. Not great but better.
    Does anyone think this is a recommended way to go? I'm always confused about how a monitor is reproducing a format that is 525 TV lines so the issue of the optimal resolution on my screen is confusing me. (I tried setting the screen to 1600X900. Now my 100% image is 11 1/2 inches but there is a very noticeable drop in image quality.)
    Thanks for any help or advice I can receive.
    John

    Has this always been the case with DV, which my SD footage is?
    Yes. Perhaps you old system had the Viewer and Canvas windows set to 100% and your new one doesn't.
    Could my problem only be a problem with this latest version of FC?
    Not likely.
    As it is, set optimally on the 27" with a second monitor for the Browser, my Viewer and Canvas are producing a 199% size image. So given that, plus the fact that I'm only seeing one field, maybe I shouldn't be surprised at the weak image I'm getting.
    BINGO!
    For best results, always use a properly calibrated, external TV monitor for critical viewing when editing.
    -DH
    Message was edited by: David Harbsmeier

Maybe you are looking for