Mac alternatives for affordable 5.1 AC3 encoding?

A musician, I was looking into DVDSP 4 so I could get into adding 5.1 audio created in Cubase SX to video. I have FCPE, which has more than plenty of video production features for me, so obviously I don't want to spend $1300 just for 5.1 AC3 encoding.
Is there an alternative for 5.1 dolby encoding for mac users under the $500 mark? Do I need to go over to the dark side for this? (I've seen a couple apps for Windows).

Hi again-
Okay, about DVD-A: you asked about playback options, specifically the cable issue (six analog or one optical specifically.) It depends...how's that for an answer! Actually, it depends on your player and preamp/receiver. I take it since you knew enough to ask the question in the first place, you're familiar with the copy protection involved with both DVD-Audio and SACD for that matter. They were originally not allowed to be sent digitally from the player to the preamp. I believe it's the way the labels wanted to try to put the copy genie back in the bottle that they lost from CDs. Anyways, unless you've got something like D-Link from Denon (for only their DVD and receiver) or even some FireWire units that talk the same encryption on both ends for digital it won't work. Me, I have to rely on the six audio RCA cables to get the signal from my Denon DVD player to the Outlaw Audio preamp. The normal digital cable I've got connected will not pass the DVD-Audio or SACD stream along from the player. Another case of me, the end user, being treated as guilty until proven innocent. But that's another story.
DTS CDs: I've found that the medium I use, either DVD or redbook CD, is rather irrelevant when it comes to providing a DTS stream to my preamp- it likes both equally well, and recognizes them identically as DTS. The most important thing is the digital steam that's DTS encoded- once it leaves the player, it looks the same going across the wire. At least that's been my experience. That's why DTS originally could release DTS CDs- as long as their was a digital connection to a preamp that can decode DTS, a normal CD player works fine. In fact, I can also use the six channel input to play it back as my DVD player decodes the DTS stream internally and often do. My 14 year old CD player won't decode DTS, but with the digital out it can only pass the stream along to an outboard decoder.
As an aside, I can expand on this a bit. To augment my modest home studio monitors (two Event 20/20's), I bought an okay 5.1 speaker setup, the Alesis ProActive one that is more or less a rebranded Logitech but with six analog 5.1 inputs (important to me for mixing from my MOTU 828) and detachable speaker wire because I'm a prude that way. Anyway, out of the box and connected via one optical cable from my G5, I could get it to play anything except my DTS encoded tracks. Actually it played them- think white noise. Not good. I did some Googles and found out that the volume coming from the Mac had to be pretty much pegged to the max for the DTS decoder in the ProActive brain to recognize the digital stream. Once I did that, I got the DTS 5.1 soundtrack just fine.
Too bad about IM not being prompt. Like I said, I like the product and I've had no issues and I've needed no support as the product is self-documenting. It does one thing and does it well for me. Hopefully someone from their sales team will find this thread and convince the company to arrange at least a basic sales page with the website. As I said earlier, I did many Googles over the course of maybe a month and never found the right query to hit IM's page, and it was DTS that finally pointed me to their website.
DVD Studio Pro is worth it, if only to allow you to share your recordings to create DD mixes with pretty menus and the such. If IM ever gets off their butt it's worth at least a demo since you could encode and burn both DD and DTS tracks to the same DVD and see what you'd like better.
DVD-Audio is (was?) a good format (pet peeve- let me leave the TV off please- I hate having to navigate a menu to start track 1!!!) Of course there's enough confusion in the home theater world now that explaining to someone that you'll need six more cables isn't easy. Chicken and egg too- the software titles never panned out for the masses. And don't get me going with Sony screwing up yet again by not releasing stuff like the entire Pink Floyd catalog in SACD at launch of that format. I've heard enough 5.1 mixes of both classic and new recordings to know that I'm completely sold on the notion of surround music. Unless you like classical music, the choices are a bit thin of course. I do agree with you- hopefully the HD versions of DD and DTS will give the industry a kick in the backside to release more multichannel music.
Hmmm...encoding DTS via Virtual PC, eh? Shouldn't be too bad. Then again, if enough people from Apple who have the power to do something realizes that you, me, and at least a few others are interested but have to resort to a Windows solution for a multi-media codec, maybe they'll release such a beast. Then again, I'm one of the many waiting for a decent alternative to Quicken since Intuit screwed up the initial OS X version and never quite fixed it...
Cheers!
Marty

Similar Messages

  • What is an MAC alternative for FS Capture?

    What is the best MAC alternative for FS Capture?

    There are a number of methods built into to the OS itself. sanjampet posted a few of the shortcuts. You can find more shortcuts in OS X Help. If you don't want to remember shortcuts, you can also use the Grab utility that came with your Mac, or open Preview and choose File/Take Screen Shot. If you want to record video (since that is also a feature of FS Capture), you can open QuickTime Player and do New Screen Recording.
    But the OS X screen capture features do not do everything that FS Capture can do. If you need more, there are some real screen capture workhorses like SnapzPro X, iShowU, SnagIt, ScreenFlow, etc. so do you can do things like name the captures as you make them or set a folder for them to go into.

  • .Mac Alternatives for Free

    I am a cheap person and I was wondering what are some great .Mac alternatives. So far I have run into NotMac (Leapord not support) which makes your Mac the server and gives you all the feature of .Mac and how ever much space you have on the computer. And there is also sitesled.com for webhosting (like 512MB). Any Others That are good?????

    Patrick Henke wrote:
    Hosting on your machine isn't the best idea, home computers are not designed to handle web hosting. Thats what servers are for. Although it will work, you are almost assured a painfully slow load times for anyone not on your computer.
    Not true, web server is very light weight (for home use), modern computers should be able to... I used to have a PPC-9600 as a server, heck my Newton PDA could host a web site (text base).
    Now, the problems are the contents and the back-end pipe, ie: at home you have what? DSL? cable modem? if you have DSL connection your upload speed is ~400kbits/sec, I have to check cable modem speed.
    Nonetheless, the real problem is that you have to leave the darn thing on all the time - even when you only get one hit a day.
    Message was edited by: Cyclosaurus

  • Is there any mac alternatives for Camspace? I would love to use my mac as a nintendo wii

    As title says, I would like to know if there is any good software for mac that will do exactly what Camspace does if not better.
    any ideas?
    Jason

    Hello
    Key to do that is Sharing file
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1549
    http://macs.about.com/od/networking/tp/filesharingmac.htm
    HTH
    Pierre

  • Mac alternative for Coffeecup's Password Wizard

    Hi
    We have an organisation for history teachers, and we also publish a magazine.
    We would like to post past & new issues off the magazine on our website, but only for those who are subscribed to the magazine. iWeb only has one login & password.
    Does anyone know off a simple app that can manage this?
    I've been looking everywhere for something like this to run on a Mac, for someone who doesn't know anything about php or MySQL.
    What we also would like to do is that people could upload stuff to the site (interactivity), f.i. they have a good lesson prepaired off the French Revolution, can they then upload it? Is that possible?
    A bit like adding pics to a web-gallery?
    Already thanks from all Flemish history teachers…
    JVK

    That is why I'm looking for something else, so that not everyone has the same login and pass.
    Does that change with a php-database?
    Why is this so difficult to do?
    Thanks already!
    JVK

  • Is there an alternative for Adobe Flash for Mac & Firefox

    Running Mac OS 10.6.8 Snow Leopard with Firefox 13.0. Was notified that I needed to install Adobe Flash/Shockwave to see video content.
    Have loaded and updated to the newest version as of last week but Firefox has become buggy, freezing up but my pointer will still move. I continually get requests from Flashplayer to store data on my machine. Continually get error messages that I have to click DISMISS and the it works normally.
    Just a regular PIA. I have uninstalled Flashplayer and the problems disappear but I cannot access a lot of content, especially videos.
    IS there any alternative for Mac?
    thanks,
    Rob

    Note that Flash may not be working properly if you disable local storage.
    Flash Website Storage Settings panel:
    * http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager07.html
    Global Storage Settings Panel:
    * http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager03.html
    Flash Local storage settings Help:
    * http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/help02.html

  • Free AC3 encoding workflow

    Like most of you, I was annoyed to find out I couldn't create AC3 surround sound files with my CS4 software, and also that we got downgraded from Audition to Soundbooth.  We all paid a lot for it! I know many people have ranted about that already, so enough said.
    Here is a workflow that gets around that problem without ponying up for the SurCode Plug-in, and/or buying Audition!
    To convert your mixed 5.1 audio, or stereo audio, to the DVD standard AC3 file that Encore wants, download the latest version of Audacity here: http://audacity.sourceforge.net/  It is available for Mac OS X, Microsoft Windows, GNU/Linux, and other operating systems.  If you don't know already, it's free!
    Now, before I start getting flamed, about Audacity, it works great!  The UI is not the most modern, but the quality is top-notch.  I've used it for years and most complaints about it are unjustified.
    You'll need to download the latest version: "Beta: 1.3x - for advanced users."  There will soon, I hope, be an Audacity 2.0 stable release. Until then, use the Beta release for this workflow.
    Note:  I'll focus on Premiere Pro CS4, because that is where I originally troubleshooted this, but something similar will work for the other Adobe products that use sound.
    Workflow:
    Create your mixed 5.1 surround sound audio in Premiere, and output the audio only by going to File > Export > Media, and selecting "Windows Waveform" as the output.  You should only have "Export Audio" checked.  Verify the format in the Summary section.  You should see something like: 48000 Hz, 5.1 Surround, 16 bit.  Now under Audio codec, make sure "Uncompressed" is selected.  Click Okay, and Adobe Media Encoder should launch.  Click "Start Queue" and your audio file will be created.  You'll get an interleaved 6 channel wave file.  Not all applications will open it, but Audacity will. 
    Note:  When you mix your surround sound in the Audio Mixer, you'll place your little "Puck" where you want the sound to come from.  Picture yourself in the middle of the "dish," if it's a puck, isn't it in a rink, as in hockey rink...ah, but I digress.  Anyway, you'll notice that volume meters in the 5.1 (6 channel) Master section are laid out in the following order: L,R,LS,RS,C,LFE.  Also, if you open a 5.1 audio file in the Source panel, you'll see the same order from top to bottom: L,R,LS,RS,C,LFE.   Soundbooth also does it that way.  Ahh....Adobe...nice try. 
    The actual channel order should be L,R,C,LFE,LS,RS.  That's the order that you'll probably have to assign in the "Audio Output Mapping" section in the properties menu to get your channels to play correctly with your surround sound hardware.  L,R,C,LFE,LS,RS is also the order that interleaved files use.  So after you create your 5.1 file, and open it in another audio program that displays them in the "proper" order, like Audacity, you'll see your tracks laid out from top to bottom in that order.  I'm not sure why Adobe does it that way, but oh well.
    Surround sound primer: 
    The LFE channel is not, despite popular misconception, a subwoofer channel.  Bass from all the channels in a surround sound Amplifier is summed and sent out to the Subwoofer.  The LFE channel is supposed to be used only for very low frequencies, to create extra  ...oomph.  I think that is the technical term.  It is not supposed to be used for bass frequencies from the other tracks.  It is for explosions, dinosaur footsteps, ...etc. 
    Audacity will open DVD ".vob" files, and even let you select which stream (usually Language) to open.  As an example, open up a movie with some action in it like Ironman (The movie starts at "VTS_03_1.vob") and look at the LFE channel.  It's the 4th track from the top in Audacity.  You'll see it's silent except at parts where there is thumping AC/DC music at the Intro, or explosions.  It's not used as a subwoofer channel!   
    With that in mind, you may have noticed, unless I'm missing something, that there is no way in the Premiere Mixer to assign an audio track only to the LFE channel.  Sure, you can dial up the "Bass Clef" knob to 0.00 db, and send a mono channel's audio to the LFE channel, but there is no place to put the "Puck" that only outputs to LFE.  There is one for the center channel, but without someplace to put it, your 40 Hz dinosaur footprint "Thump" is going to also be assigned to some of the other channels.  Which channels depends on your "Puck" placement.  This is not correct.  Again, unless I'm missing something, Adobe needs to correct this oversight.  We'll get back to this problem with a solution later, but first let's continue with the AC3 issue.
    At this point you should have your wave file.  If you want to apply any global changes to all 6 channels, you can open it in Adobe Soundbooth and trim the beginning or end, and apply effects to the entire file.  You cannot, however, make changes to individual channels.  Audacity will!  We'll get to that later.
    Encode with Audacity: 
    Install the software and go to Edit > Preferences > Libraries, and click on "Download" for the "FFmpeg Library."  This is the library that Audacity will use to create the .AC3 file.  Once installed, the library version should show up next to "FFmpeg Library Version" While the "Audacity Preferences" window is still open, select "Import/Export" and select "Use Custom Mix", this is used to export a 5.1 channel file.  Now you're ready to open your .wave file from Premiere.  Drag and drop it in the Audacity workspace and you should see 6 mono tracks laid out from top to bottom in the following order: L,R,C,LFE,LS,RS.  Audacity will let you edit the individual tracks, unlike Soundbooth, thanks Adobe.  But for now, we'll keep it simple.  Set your "Project Rate" in audacity in the lower-left corner to what you want the AC3 file to be.  For DVD, chose 48000 (Hz).  If you leave it at 44100 (Hz) Encore won't import it. 
    Your almost done.  Now let's export the file.  Go to Files > Export... > and select "AC3 Files (FFmpeg)" in the "Save as type:" drop-down.  Click the "Options..." button and set the "Bit Rate:" for your file.  For 5.1 AC3 audio, probably 448.  Now enter a file name and click "Save."  This will open the "Advanced Mixing Options" window.  This allows you to re-map the tracks to a different channel order.  It should be correct, and it should show "Output Channels:" set to 6.  Press "OK" and you're done.
    Presto, you have a 5.1 channel AC3 file.  Use that in Encore, or whatever DVD creation program you use, and when you play your DVD you'll have full 5.1 audio coming out your surround sound Amplifier.  That is if you have one.
    Test your file:
    If you want to test your file, you can do a couple of things.  Since Soundbooth and Adobe  Bridge won't even open AC3 files, and Encore will open but only play the Left and Right channels in the preview, you'll have to either import the file into Premiere, or use another media player.
    If you got Premiere to play your surround properly, then you can drag and drop the file into the "Project" panel and preview it from there. You will hear all 6 channels in the correct speakers, but I did notice that the quality is not very good.  Maybe Premiere doesn't decode AC3 all that well.  I heard some crackle that isn't in the file.  How do I know it isn't just a bad encoding job by Audacity?  Because I played the file with the VLC media player, and Cyberlink PowerDVD on the same computer, and also on a DVD in my home theater system with no artifacts.  Maybe Premiere doesn't decode AC3 files well. 
    The VLC player, will play almost any file in the known universe, and at least on my computer, it automatically played the AC3 surround file, created by Audacity, with all the channels mapped correctly.  That's right, full surround out my speakers with only default settings.  It's a great player.  Get it for free here: http://www.videolan.org/
    Test with Encore:
    So far so good. Now open Encore, drop the AC3 file in an empty project, throw it on a Timeline and build the project without Video,  It will autoplay without a menu this way. If you set the End-Action to the same AC3 file it will repeat continuously.  Either burn this to DVD-RW and test it in your DVD player, or better yet, Build the project to a DVD Image instead, and mount it in a virtual DVD   Drive with a program like "Virtual CloneDrive."
    If you don't know what that is, or how to do it, it is very simple.  Go to: http://www.slysoft.com/en/ and download "Virtual Clonedrive."  It is free.  It tricks your operating system into thinking you have another physical DVD drive.  In fact, it can create up to 8 virtual drives.  Now you don't have to waste time burning, and erasing DVD's every time you make a change to a project.  You can build your project as a DVD Image from Encore, save the .iso file to your Desktop and "mount" it (load it) in Virtual Clonedrive.  You're computer will now think you loaded a DVD into a physical drive, and launch whatever DVD player you have installed.  Mine launches "Cyberlink PowerDVD" which plays the AC3 audio-only DVD in full surround sound on my computer. 
    Building and testing projects this way will save you endless hours.  If you need to make a quick change, just "Unmount" the .iso in Virtual Clonedrive, rebuild your project to the same filename, and "Mount" it again.  Instant testing!
    Now, as promised, back to that LFE Channel problem with Premiere that I mentioned:
    Audacity will let you modify the individual channels in your interleaved 6-Channel file.  So don't put anything in that channel in your Premiere mixer. Leave the "Bass Clef" knobs at full CCW position ( -00 db ).  The bass from the other channels will go to your subwoofer automatically in your Amplifier.
    Now if you have some low frequency effects files, open them in Audacity.  You can open multiple instances of Audacity at the same time by going to "File > New."  Then, copy and paste them into the LFE Track at the correct point.
    Audacity newbie Hint:  Audacity doesn't yet have a "Mix-Paste" function, so to avoid altering the track length as you paste in your clips, do the following: Select the LFE track by clicking on it's info area.  The info area should say something like "Mono, 48000Hz"  Then press "Delete," That will remove everything from the track.  Now copy and paste your clips into the track by clicking once with the "Selection Tool" where you want the clip to start, and selecting "Edit > Paste."  If you need to fine tune the position of the pasted clip, use the "Time Shift Tool" to move it left or right.  If you work from left to right, then you won't push clips over when you paste new ones in.
    There is another way to do this by opening up new tracks, using the "Mix and Render" function, and re-ordering the tracks to maintain the L,R,C,LFE,LS,RS channel order.  But that's for advanced users.
    Where to get thumpy effects?:
    Remember, Audacity will open DVD ".vob" files.  Just remember to get permission from the copyright owner.  HeHe.
    PS If you can't get your surround sound to work with Premiere on your computer, see my other tutorial.

    After further research, there is a better AC3 encoder out there than the FFMPEG that Audacity uses.  It is a more sophisticated implementation of the format.  Unlike FFMPEG, it uses floating point numbers instead of integers internally, among other things.  It is also updated periodically.  Although the pace is glacial.
    You can read about it here: http://aften.sourceforge.net/
    The easiest way to use it is with a graphical front-end like "wavtoac3encoder" found here: http://code.google.com/p/wavtoac3encoder/
    You don't need to change anything from the default settings.
    Just follow my tutorial above and instead of using Audacity to create the AC3 file after you are done editing, output the multi-track file in .wav format uncompressed from Audacity.  Then drag and drop it into "wavtoac3encoder"and create your file.
    If you don't need to edit the multi-track .wav file from Premiere in Audacity, then just drag and drop that file into "wavtoac3encoder" and encode.
    The quality, although probably not as good as SurCode, sounds good to me.
    Remember, this is strictly for non-commercial use.

  • HT4597 what will be the new alternatives for iWeb publishing,  Idisk & photo gallery ?

    what will be the new alternatives for iWeb publishing,  Idisk & photo gallery ?

    Thanks for the reply that there will be 3rd party support.
    One of the main reasons why I went from PC to Mac was because of all these cool features.
    Am dissapointed to see them leave.  ( Iweb, Photogallery, Idisk... )

  • Mac driver for OS 10.6.8

    I just purchased HP Envy 7640 printer, and there are no drivers listed for MAC OS 10.6.8.I can  not upgrade the OS, as sever critical programs will not run on Mac OS 10.10. what recourse do I have?

    Hi,
    I afraid you will have to upgrade the OS for the printer to fully work ir get an older model which is compatible with Snow Leopard, the printer is only supported on Lion or newer OS versions as you may find listed below (Under the System Requirements section):
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c04353671&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en&product=6617269&tas...
    As a workaround you may use an alternative driver, but that will only allow printing from the Mac.
    For that download and install the following package:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1770?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US
    Next connect the pritner to the Mac or to the same network.
    Open System Preferences > Print & Fax and click the plus sign.
    select the listed 7640 printer and click the Print Using drop down and then on Select Printer Software.
    Select the HP ENVY 5530 from the list and add the printer, that should allow printing to the 7640 printer.
    Basic scanning can be done via the EWS interface by opening the Scan tab, that only applicable for a network connection and only provide basic scan options.
    It can be reached by typing the printer IP address into Safari.
    Hope that may help,
    Shlomi
    Say thanks by clicking the Kudos thumb up in the post.
    If my post resolve your problem please mark it as an Accepted Solution

  • Bought my mac pro for 1099.  to repair it cost 754, is it worth repairng?, bought my mac pro for 1099.  to repair it cost 754, is it worth repairng?

    bought my mac pro for 1099.  to repair it cost 754, is it worth repairng?, bought my mac pro for 1099.  to repair it cost 754, is it worth repairng

    It all depends - if you can put that $754 towards a new unit, an you can afford to add a little something to it, then I would go for a new computer. How old is your machine? Only you can make the decision. If your machine is older, you might want to ask the Apple Store or AASP about their 'flat rate pricing' - a scheme by which you pay a little over $300 and they repair everything on the machine. They may stick to their guns and only offer you the $754, but it's worth asking about.
    See this concerning the flat rate repair option.
    Good luck,
    Clinton

  • Which  current Mac Pro for Aperture/Photoshop

    After much research and what seems to be chasing my tail, I though I'd ask the forum for some advice on which machine will best suit my needs. I am currently running Aperture and Photoshop CS3 and looking for a fast machine for the job. I sort through around 2500-3000 raw files per week and hope the new Intel Xeons will speed up my workflow. It's the question of "How many cores are better?" that's confusing me as I am unclear on how many Aperture and Photoshop can actually make use of.
    I'm looking to upgrade from my 3.06 iMac to a Mac Pro but having trouble choosing between a new 2.66 quad or a refurbished 2.26 8-core. I understand the drop in processor speed might be noticeable in some instances but the from what I have gathered an upgrade to the ATI HD 4870 is a must as is 6GB ram on the 2.66 and 8GB ram on the 2.26. It's not so much the price difference of the two machines (£2200 for the upgraded 2.66 and roughly £2700 for a refurbished 2.26 plus upgrades) it's will my workflow see any great benefits from the 8-core over the quad. The program I use most is Aperture, followed by Photoshop then FotoMagico, iDVD and Toast Titanium. Does Snow Leopard affect the use of cores in these programs?
    Any feedback is much appreciated or pointing in the direction of some real world tests as all the bench tests of the 8-core are so impressive but I'll not be using it for 3D/Video at all.
    Thanks in advance for your help.

    According to the Adobe blog the delay in offering a 64-bit suite for Mac is because the entire suite has to be rewritten in Cocoa (both previous and current offerings are written in Carbon) CS5 will be written in Cocoa and will utilise the full functionality of the Snow Leopard OS (OpenGL, GCD etc) so memory addressing will be a huge step forward on Photoshop (which I use).
    I used Photoshop CS4 on a 2008 Mac Pro 2 x 2.8GHz 8 core (dual Xeon 5400 series Quad core CPUs) and just recently switched to a 2009 Mac Pro 2 x 2.26GHz 8 core (Xeon 5500 series Quad core CPUs). I used CS3 on the original Mac Pro 2 x 2.66Ghz (Dual Xeon Dual Core CPUs = 4 cores total). It's not a fair reflection as CS3 ran under Rosetta on the original Mac Pro and CS4 has better integration on the Intel based Macs, but in general, I noticed a much better rate of workflow on the 8 core machines over the 4 core machine.
    More importantly, I would point out that running batch process of RAW files in CaptureOne Pro was significantly performing the batch process on the 8 core machines than on the 4 core machine. (250 RAW files {with no corrections] from a Canon EOS 1D MKII into 16-bitt TIFF files). I can't remember the exact figures but the 8 core machines were @ 23 - 25 minutes quicker than the 4 core machine.
    I know it's not scientific and software versions were different which could add to the different results in part, but the 8 core machines both out performed the 4 core machine substantially.
    However, the 2009 Mac Pro Quad Core is capable of running 2 threads per core (in effect a virtual 8 core machine and as many reviewers have pointed out, perform faster than the 8 core Mac Pro in certain applications (which have not been written to utilise the full multi-CPU-multi-core environment.
    The Memory limitation on the Quad Core is 16GB RAM (Apple state 8GB but reviewers have installed 4 x 4GB DIMMs into the Quad Core without issue). Unless you are doing 3D or HD rendering etc you probably won't really need over 16GBs of RAM, however the cost of 4GB memory sticks is expensive. Crucial only offer a 12GB kit for the Quad Core Mac Pro 2009 to make full use of the triple channel memory speeds (DDR3 best performance in multiples of 3) and 12GBs from Crucial is @£771.00 (prices correct at time of writing this. This equates to @ £257 per 4GB.
    Total for Quad Mac Pro with 12GB (3 x 4GB RAM) = £2670
    Total for Octo Core Mac Pro with 12GB (6 x 2GB RAM) =£2731 (New price not refurb)
    Graphics card upgrade etc will be the same on both machines. Memory based on Crucial Memory prices.
    So, for a 2009 Mac Pro with 12GB RAM, it is £61 dearer for an 8 core (virtual 16 cores) machine over the Quad Core Mac Pro. The 8 core system will give you further memory expansion once prices of the 4GB memory sticks come down significantly. The Quad Core will only be able to be upgraded with 8GB RAM sticks over the 4GB sticks available now and will cost a huge amount at time of launch.
    Buying a refurbishment 2.26 GHz with similar memory upgrade would in my opinion be the way to go. I know the CPU clock speed is lower, but in real time non memory intensive applications the difference will be hardly noticeable.
    I went through the same dilemma as you. I opted for the 8 core system with 12GB RAM and the ATI HD4870 graphics (bought as an upgrade kit so was dearer than the build to order option). I am very happy with my purchase.
    The other option is to check out eBay there may be a very well spec'd 2008 Mac Pro for sale with warranty, 16GB RAM and the 8800GT graphics card for less than either of the new systems.
    Over the long term, the 8 core offers more affordable customisation options over the Quad Core, but it depends on how long you plan to use the machine

  • Using Mac mini for storage

    Hello Folks,
    Quick question: can I use the mac mini for storage only? I have loads of movies, music and tv shows that I want to store.
    How would this work if at all possible?
    Alternative advice on EHD that I should rather use?
    Thanks!
    JDT

    Yes, and target disk mode, or firewire over IP or setting it up as a file server are all possibilities. But given there are faster more capacious hard drives for less, I would get that instead unless there is some feature of the Mac Mini that a simple hard drive can't do that you need. I.e. Front Row, Media Central or other software can be used to see your data on a TV. An external hard drive attached to your desktop Mac together with an AppleTV can do the same thing but the media formats are more limited.

  • Alternative for vmware workstation?

    I am learning Application Packaging and it requires me to have a vmware workstaion in my machine. I am currently using MacBookPro Retina 15". Is it possible to install vmware workstation on Mac OS or is there any alternative for it? I would highly appreciate any suggestions.

    Go to the VMWare website for that information. They have VM Fusion for the Mac, and I believe there is also a workstation version.

  • Mac software for creating e-brochures?

    Is there any mac software out there to create e-brochures with page flip?
    The only software i can find is windows only!
    Thanks, Nathan

    Pratgeek wrote:i recently switched to archlinux from ubuntu.there is ubuntu there was tdfd for creating Data Flow Diagrams but i am not able to find any alternative for archlinux.
    Could anyone suggest me the software to be used.
    drcouzelis wrote:
    rp181 wrote:Can't find the program u are talking about though.
    I can't find it either. Pratgeek, what was the name of the application you used in Ubuntu? Is there a website for it?
    probably a kind of necrobump, but i've been searching for flowchart drawing software, and found this topic.
    well, mentioned tdfd is the part of software suite called TCM available at least in debian/ubuntu.
    it appears to be really old, i could found only user guide and ubuntu/debian package pages on the web, but it appears to be working quite well.
    i've installed it on my ubuntu machine just half an hour ago, but it seems to be at least worth to play with, and i'd even make a PKGBUILD if i like it.

  • Mac alternative to "Play On"?

    Has anyone found a Mac alternative to "Play On" other than using Parallels?  I don't have PCs in the house, only iMac and MacBooks and would prefer not to buy one!

    I'm not sure exactly what you are trying to do.  I have two setups at home that allow me to watch media from my Mac on my TVs.
    Downstairs in my den, I have a PS3 connected to my home network.  I use MediaLink on the Mac to stream media files to the PS3.
    Upstairs in my master bedroom, I use a Western Digital WDTV Live Streaming Media Player to do the same thing.  It too works with MediaLink on the Mac.  It can also work with a free media server called Serviio.
    Both the PS3 and the WDTV can work wirelessly via wifi, but can choke on high bitrate 1080p video.  Standard definition and lower bitrate 720p usually stream okay via wifi.  A wired connection gives better results.  For wifi you will need a wireless router.  You can't go wireless from the Mac directly to the PS3 or WDTV.
    You may also want to consider Apple TV.  I decided against it as it does not support 1080p and does not have the option of local storage.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Problem in display of text in ALV report

    Dear experts, I am working on a MM Report in which I need to display Material Basic data text maintained in MM01,02 Tcodes through ALV report. I have declared a string type variable for the Basic data text in the Final Internal Table. For reading the

  • When I plug headphones into my iPhone, I only heard sound on one side.  This is a recent phenom.  Is this fixable?

    It seems like an electronic problem, since for a while I could jiggle the plug and still get stereo sound.  Is this easily fixable for an iPhone3?

  • Saved images disconnected in Organizer

    I have been using Elements 9 for more than a year.  Today it started doing something crazy.  When I edit a photo (did this using "guided edit"), instead of saving the edited version (in a version set), all I get is a grey screen with an hour glass. 

  • Scanning officejet 7410

    I can print wirelessly, and copy without problem. Can' t scan. HP solution center error box states " HP Solution center can not run because your device installation is not complete." I have uninstalled and reinstalled the drivers and software. Not su

  • Problems Installing LabVIEW

    Problems Installing LabVIEW Run-Time Engine for Ubuntu 11.04 I'm relatively new to Ubuntu and its community, but have been pleasantly surprised with how easy troubleshooting has been. Unfortunately, I've spent the last two days trying to install the